- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Background: Right cardiac chamber remodeling is widespread in patients with connective tissue disease (CTD). Serum uric acid (SUA) is considered a potential independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and elevated SUA levels are often observed in patients with CTD. The correlation between SUA levels and right cardiac chamber remodeling remains unclear. This study investigated the association of SUA with right cardiac chamber remodeling as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance feature-tracking (CMR-FT) in CTD patients.
Methods and results: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 104 CTD patients and 52 age- and sex-matched controls were consecutively recruited. All individuals underwent CMR imaging, and their SUA levels were recorded. The patients were divided into three subgroups based on the tertiles of SUA level in the present study. CMR-FT was used to evaluate the right atrial (RA) longitudinal strain and strain rate parameters as well as right ventricular (RV) global systolic peak strain and strain rate in longitudinal and circumferential directions for each subject. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were used to explore the association of SUA with RV and RA strain parameters. Compared with the controls, the CTD patients showed significantly higher SUA levels but a lower RV global circumferential strain (GCS) and RA phasic strain parameters (all p < 0.05), except the RA booster strain rate. RV GCS remained impaired even in CTD patients with preserved RV ejection fraction. Among subgroups, the patients in the third tertile had significantly impaired RV longitudinal strain (GLS), RV GCS, and RA reservoir and conduit strain compared with those in the first tertile (all p < 0.05). The SUA levels were negatively correlated with RV GLS and RV GCS as well as with RA reservoir and conduit strain and strain rates (the absolute values of β were 0.250 to 0.293, all P < 0.05). In the multivariable linear regression analysis, the SUA level was still an independent determinant of RA conduit strain (β = -0.212, P = 0.035) and RV GCS (β = 0.207, P = 0.019).
Conclusion: SUA may be a potential risk factor of right cardiac chamber remodeling and is independently associated with impaired RA conduit strain and RV GCS in CTD patients.
1 Introduction
Connective tissue disease (CTD) is a heterogeneous group of chronic inflammatory diseases due to abnormal auto-immunity regulation and characterized by multiorgan involvement, including systemic sclerosis (SSc), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS), idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), rheumatoid arthritis, and many other autoimmune diseases. Cardiovascular and pulmonary involvement is a common complication and one of the leading causes of death in patients with CTD. There are multiple clinical manifestations, presented as myocarditis, heart failure, valvular heart disease, coronary artery disease, pulmonary hypertension (PH) (1), and interstitial lung disease (ILD) (2). Right cardiac chamber remodeling, including chamber dilatation, wall hypertrophy, myocardial fibrosis, and cardiac insufficiency, plays an important role in the progression and prognosis of CTD. Both the primary involvement of the right ventricular (RV) myocardium and the secondary impact of ILD and PH on RV afterload can result in right cardiac chamber remodeling in patients with CTD. Echocardiography is limited by an acoustic window and poor reproducibility in assessing the right heart. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is the current gold standard for quantitatively evaluating cardiac structure and function with high reproducibility. CMR feature tracking (CMR-FT) is a promising technique that evaluates myocardial deformation and provides additional information for subclinical cardiac dysfunction (3). Thus, RV and right atrial (RA) strain parameters may be more sensitive to assess the changes in right heart function and mechanics. Evidence supporting the early diagnostic and prognostic value of RV and RA strain parameters in CTD patients with cardiovascular involvement has accumulated over the years (4–6).
Serum uric acid (SUA) is the final metabolic product of purine degradation, which correlated with multiple cardiovascular risk factors and could be considered an independent predictor for several adverse cardiovascular outcomes (7). Previous studies demonstrated that an elevated SUA level was a potential risk factor of cardiovascular damage in patients with CTD (8, 9). Elevated SUA levels not only increase the risk of developing PH and serve as a marker for screening PH in CTD (10, 11) but may also be predictors of clinical prognosis in patients with CTD-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (CTD-PAH) (12). Another study showed that SUA levels were correlated with RA pressures and RV function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (13). However, the correlation between SUA levels and right cardiac chamber remodeling in patients with CTD remains unclear. Accordingly, the present study aimed to evaluate the right cardiac chamber remodeling in patients with CTD and to investigate the association of SUA with impaired RV and RA strain parameters as assessed by CMR-FT.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study design and population
This cross-sectional study enrolled 159 consecutive patients with CTD who underwent 3.0T CMR examination from January 2015 to July 2023 in our hospital. The diagnosis of CTD was according to the American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria or the European League Against Rheumatism for IIM (14), SLE (15), SSc (16), pSS (17), and rheumatoid arthritis (18) as well as sharp criteria for mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) (19). Overlap syndrome was defined as patients with two or more clinical features of CTD at the same time. Undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) was defined as patients with clinical and laboratory features suggestive of systemic autoimmune diseases but cannot be classified into any of the defined CTD classification criteria. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age <18 years; (2) a history of coronary artery disease; (3) severe heart valvular disease, cardiomyopathy, and congenital heart disease; (4) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%; (5) severe kidney dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73 m2); (6) poor image quality; and (7) incomplete clinical data. Finally, a total of 104 CTD patients (comprising 49 patients with IIM, 29 with SLE, six with SSc, five with pSS, eight with overlap syndrome, two with rheumatoid arthritis, four with UCDT, and one with MCTD) were retrospectively included. The patients were divided into three subgroups based on the tertiles of SUA level in the present study. CTD patients with preserved RVEF (defined as RVEF ≥50%) were analyzed as a subgroup, too. Meanwhile, 52 age- and gender-matched individuals with no history of cardiovascular or systematic diseases were selected as the control group. This study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our hospital (TJ-IRB20230914), and the requirement for written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective design. The patients’ flowchart of this study is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Flowchart of the CTD patients’ enrollment. CTD, connective tissue disease; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; SUA, serum uric acid.
2.2 Clinical and laboratory data
Venous blood samples were obtained from a peripheral vein within 48 h of the CMR examination as well as without receiving any urate-lowering therapies. SUA, estimated glomerular filtration rate, total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol were measured in the laboratory department of our hospital. Pulmonary fibrosis was defined as reported on thoracic computed tomography imaging by specialist radiologists. PH was defined as systolic pulmonary arterial pressure >36 mmHg on echocardiography as measured by experienced doctors or mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥20 mmHg on right-sided heart catheterization (20).
2.3 CMR scanning protocol
All patients and controls underwent a standard clinical protocol using 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners (MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with an 18-channel phased-array receive coil in the supine position. A steady-state free-precession sequence with electrocardiogram triggering and respiratory gating was used to assess cardiac structure and function. Short-axis cine images covering the right ventricle (RV) from apex to tricuspid annulus, as well as standard cine long-axis four-chamber view, were acquired. Typical imaging parameters were as follows: echo time/repetition time, 1.4/37.7 ms; flip angle, 55°; field of view, 360 × 360 mm2; acquisition matrix size, 192 × 146; slice thickness, 8 mm; 25 phases per cardiac cycle.
2.4 Cardiac function and feature tracking analysis
Post-processing of all CMR images was analyzed using an offline customized software CVI42 (version 5.13.9, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc., Calgary, Canada). Right and left ventricular endocardial and epicardial contours were drawn manually at the end of diastole and systole in all short-axis cine images excluding the papillary muscles and trabeculae. Biventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume, myocardial mass, and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated. Right atrial (RA) volumes were measured in CVI42 function LAX biplanar module using the biplane area–length method on the cine CMR 4-chambers views, excluding the confluence of the superior and inferior vena cava, as well as the atrial appendage. RA maximum (Vmax) and minimum volumes (Vmin) were assessed at the end of ventricular systole and diastole, respectively. Pre-atrial volumes (Vpre-A) were obtained before atrial contraction. The functions of RA were calculated by the following equations as previously described (21): (1) reservoir function: total emptying fraction (EFt) = (Vmax − Vmin)/Vmax × 100%; (2) conduit function: passive emptying fraction (EFp) = (Vmax – Vpre-A)/Vmax × 100%; (3) booster pump function: active emptying fraction (EFa) = (Vpre-A–Vmin)/Vpre-A × 100%. All volumes and RV myocardial masses were indexed to body surface area before analysis.
The myocardial deformation parameters of the RV free wall (RVFW) as well as the RA were evaluated in CVI42 feature-tracking module. The endocardial and epicardial contours of RV and RA were manually drawn using a point-and-click approach on the end-diastolic images, respectively. Subsequently, the contours were automatically tracked throughout the cardiac cycle while also checking the quality of the automatic tracking and adjusting the initial contour manually if necessary. RV global circumferential strain (GCS) and global circumferential strain rate (GCSR) were derived from tracking the RVFW in the four-chamber view and short-axial views, while the global longitudinal RV and RA strain and strain rates were quantified based on the four-chamber view only (Supplementary Figures S1, S2). RV radial strain parameters were not evaluated due to the high variability as previously described (22). Three aspects of RA phasic function were quantified for each subject as follows: (1) RA reservoir function (total strain [εs] and strain rate [SRs]), (2) RA conduit function (passive strain [εe] and strain rate [SRe]), and (3) RA booster function (active strain [εa] and strain rate [SRa]). Above all, the results were based on the average of three independent repeated measurements.
2.5 Reproducibility of RV and RA strain analysis
The inter- and intra-observer variabilities for RV and RA strain and strain rate parameters were obtained from 40 randomly selected subjects (10 controls and 30 CTD patients). Inter-observer variability was assessed by two radiologists (YT and JW, with 3 and 5 years of experience in CMR imaging, respectively) blinded to all clinical information. Intra-observer variability was measured twice by radiologist YT, with at least 1 month between repeated analysis.
2.6 Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Deutschland GmbH, Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism version 10.0.2 (GraphPad Prism Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Continuous variables were summarized as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median with interquartile range (IQR) and were compared between groups using Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test as appropriate based on their normality. Comparisons among three groups were carried out using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni or Games Howell post hoc test for normally distributed data or the Kruskal–Wallis test for non-normally distributed data. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies (percentages) and were compared using the Pearson χ2 test. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were used to investigate the association of SUA levels with CMR-derived RV and RA strain parameters. Multivariable analyses were adjusted to all variables without collinearity and a P-value <0.05 in univariable analysis as well as age, sex, hyperlipidemia, disease duration, pulmonary fibrosis, and PH. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to determine the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of RV and RA strain parameters. A two-sided P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3 Results
3.1 Patients’ characteristics
The clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. CTD patients had significantly higher SUA levels [308.5 (249.00, 357.800) vs. 265.30 (222.80, 297.35) umol/L, P=0.001] than controls. According to the tertiles of SUA level distribution in the present study, the CTD patients were divided into three subgroups: the first tertile (SUA level <276 umol/L), the second tertile (276–342 umol/L), and the third tertile (>342 umol/L). Approximately, a third of CTD patients had pulmonary involvement and presented in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III–IV, which had a higher percentage in the third tertile. The median disease duration was 17.50 (5.00, 60.00) months. The CTD patients in the third tertile also had a significantly longer disease duration than those in the first tertile [21.00 (6.00, 66.00) vs. 7.00 (2.00, 52.75) months, P = 0.030]. No significant differences were found among age, sex, BMI, BSA, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure as well as the proportion of hypertension and diabetes mellitus between the CTD patients and the controls (all P > 0.05), but the percentage of hyperlipidemia was higher in CTD patients than in the controls (34.6 vs. 9.6%, P = 0.001).
3.2 CMR characteristics
The conventional CMR characteristics as well as RV and RA strain parameters of all participants are shown in Table 2. The CTD patients had significantly increased RVEDVi, RVESVi, and LV mass index, whereas they have decreased RVEF and RV GCS compared with the controls (all p < 0.05), and RV GCS remains impaired even in CTD patients with preserved RVEF (-17.81 ± 3.56 vs. -19.17 ± 2.84%, P = 0.025). Although no differences in RA morphological and functional parameters were observed among CTD patients and controls, the CTD patients showed significantly impaired RA strain parameters except SRa [εs: 49.52 ± 16.90 vs. 58.04 ± 12.60 %, P<0.001; εe: 25.92 (17.13, 34.17) vs. 33.95 (25.66, 39.81) %, P = 0.002; εa: 22.20 (15.73, 27.68) vs. 25.31 (18.39, 30.24) %, P = 0.025; SRs: 2.62 ± 0.83 vs. 3.04 ± 0.95 1/s, P = 0.005; SRe: -2.21 (-3.05, -1.46) vs. -2.62 (-3.62, -2.04) 1/s, P = 0.004]. In CTD patients with preserved RVEF, there are significantly increased LV mass index, RVEDVi, RVSVi, RAEFt and RAEFa, whereas decreased RAVmin index compared with controls (all P < 0.05). Both RV and RA strain parameters tended to worsen with increasing SUA levels among subgroups. Compared with patients in the first tertile, those in the third tertile had significantly impaired RV GLS and RV GCS as well as RA reservoir and conduit strain parameters. RV GLS was also significantly lower in the second tertile (all P < 0.05). The RV GLSR, RV GCSR, and RA booster strain parameters had no significant difference across tertiles of SUA in CTD patients (all P > 0.05). Figures 2–4 show the RV and RA strain parameters in CTD subgroups based on the tertiles of SUA and controls.
Table 2 Cardiac magnetic resonance characteristics of patients with connective tissue disease and controls.
Figure 2 Comparison of RV and RA strain and strain rate between CTD subgroups by the tertiles of SUA and controls. CTD, connective tissue disease; SUA, serum uric acid; RV, right ventricular; GLS, global longitudinal strain; GLSR, global longitudinal strain rate; GCS, global circumferential strain; GCSR, global circumferential strain rate; εs, right atrial reservoir strain; εe, right atrial conduit strain; εa, right atrial booster strain; SRs, reservoir strain rate; SRe, conduit strain rate; SRa, booster strain rate.
Figure 3 Representative images of RV longitudinal and circumference strain in control and CTD subgroups by the tertiles of SUA. A 47-year-old female served as control. A 50-year-old female with SLE was in the first tertile of SUA, and the disease duration at the time of CMR was 168 months. SUA level = 166 umol/L, sPAP = 51.24 mmHg. A 49-year-old female with SLE was in the second tertile of SUA, and the disease duration at the time of CMR was 120 months. SUA level = 279 umol/L, sPAP = 45.96 mmHg. A 49-year-old female with SLE was in the third tertile of SUA, and the disease duration at the time of CMR was 216 months. SUA level = 427 umol/L, sPAP = 85.00 mmHg. RV, right ventricular; CTD, connective tissue disease; SUA, serum uric acid; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; sPAP, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure; GLS, global longitudinal strain; GCS, global circumferential strain.
Figure 4 Representative images of RA strain and strain rates in control and CTD subgroups by the tertiles of SUA. Other details are as shown in Figure 3. CTD, connective tissue disease; SUA, serum uric acid; RA, right atrial.
3.3 Association of SUA and CMR-derived RV and RA strain parameters in CTD patients
In univariable linear regression analyses, the elevated SUA levels were significantly associated with the impaired RV GLS and RV GCS as well as RA reservoir and conduit strain and strain rates (absolute value of β = 0.250 to 0.293, all P < 0.05). Multivariable linear regression analyses showed that the elevated SUA level was still independently correlated with impaired εe (β = -0.212, P = 0.035) and RV GCS (β = 0.207, P = 0.019) in CTD patients after adjustment for age, sex, hyperlipidemia, disease duration, pulmonary fibrosis, and PH as well as excluded the parameters with collinearity (including RVEDVi, RVESVi, RVSVi, RAEFt, RAEFp, RAEFa, RAVmax index, and RAVpre-A index). There were no independent associations between SUA levels and right cardiac strain rates (all P > 0.05). Other details are presented in Table 3 and Supplementary Table S1.
Table 3 Univariable and Multivariable linear regression analyses of serum uric acid and cardiac magnetic resonance-derived parameters on right ventricular (RV) and right atrial (RA) strain parameters in patients with connective tissue disease.
3.4 Reproducibility of RV and RA strain analysis
The inter-observer and intra-observer variability values of the RV and RA strain parameters are presented in Table 4. There were excellent intra- and inter-observer agreements in the measurement of RV strain and strain rates (ICC = 0.795 to 0.959 and 0.764 to 0.936, respectively) as well as RA phasic strain and strain rate (ICC = 0.850 to 0.947 and 0.830 to 0.936, respectively).
Table 4 Intra- and inter-observer variabilities of cardiac magnetic resonance-derived right ventricular (RV) and right atrial (RA) strain parameters.
4 Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study to show the relationship between SUA levels and CMR-FT-derived right atrial and ventricular strain parameters in CTD patients. This study found that CTD patients had significant right cardiac remodeling and higher SUA levels compared to controls, and the SUA levels independently correlated with εe and RV GCS. Therefore, the SUA levels may be a potential risk factor of right cardiac chamber remodeling.
4.1 Right cardiac chamber remodeling in patients with CTD
The 2021 European League Against Rheumatism recommendations highlight the importance of cardiovascular risk management in patients with CTD (23). Until now, left heart involvement in patients with CTD has been extensively explored. CTD often combined with a variety of common complications under the influence of systemic proinflammatory state and other factors such as genetic susceptibility, including left heart disease, pulmonary fibrosis, or PH—all of these can affect RV afterload. Adaptive RV remodeling may occur in the early stages of the disease to overcome increased RV afterload and ensure sufficient stroke volume. With the progression of the disease, these compensatory mechanisms gradually become inadequate, leading to RV excessive dilatation, dysfunction, and, eventually, right heart failure (24). Although RVEF typically indicates a poor prognosis, the decreased RVEF will not appear until the late stage of heart failure. CMR-FT has the potential to detect myocardial function abnormalities earlier in the disease. In patients with CTD, there are significant correlations between reduced RVEF and impaired RV GCS and RV GLS. RV GCS remains impaired even in CTD patients with preserved RVEF. These findings were consistent with those of Wu et al. (5). Athletes’ hearts also had a similar RV mechanical pattern in a recent study, with lower RVEF and RV GCS but preserved or even higher RV GLS compared with sedentary controls (25). These changes might be related to modified RV myocardial fiber orientation. Physiologically, RV contraction mainly depends on longitudinal shortening (26). The relative dominance of the circumferentially oriented fibers can be observed when chronically pressure-loaded (27). In patients with PH, the transverse wall motion of the mid-RV is significantly reduced and has stronger relationship with RVEF than longitudinal motion (28). Pettersen et al. (29) also demonstrated a predominant circumferential over longitudinal free wall shortening in patients with a systemic RV.
Furthermore, RV diastolic dysfunction may precede systolic dysfunction in diseases with chronic RV pressure overload. RA, mainly through increased dimension (higher RA reservoir function) and contractility (higher RA booster pump function), maintains RV filling of the stiffened ventricle, whereas passive emptying (conduit function) is the first to decline due to the reduced RA–RV pressure gradient (30, 31). The increased RAEFt and RAEFa and decreased RAVmin index may play as a compensatory mechanism in CTD patients with preserved RVEF. RA dilatation indicated the presence of RV diastolic stiffness (32). Excessive RA dilation and stiffness occur as the disease progresses, leading to deterioration of RA phasic functions and atrioventricular uncoupling. In the present study, the RA strain parameters significantly decline in CTD patients without overt RA dilation and dysfunction. Moreover, our findings indicate that εs was positively correlated with RVEF as well as negatively correlated with RAVmin index in patients with CTD, consistent with that observed in PH (33, 34). Therefore, RA strain parameters may be more sensitive and earlier predictors of RV overload in patients with CTD.
4.2 Association between SUA and right cardiac chamber remodeling
The present results show that patients with CTD had significantly elevated SUA levels compared with the controls, and right cardiac chamber remodeling is more severe in CTD patients with higher SUA level subgroups. However, the precise mechanisms underlying the relationship between elevated SUA and right cardiac chamber remodeling found in this study are still unclear and remain to be elucidated.
The elevated SUA levels may lead to right cardiac chamber remodeling by promoting the increased RV afterload in patients with CTD. The RV is very sensitive to afterload change compared with the left ventricle. In the present study, nearly half of the patients were cases combined with pulmonary involvement, which had a higher percentage in the third tertile. Several studies found that the SUA levels were significantly higher in CTD patients with PH than in those without PH (11–36). Although Castillo-Martínez et al. (10) reported that the baseline SUA levels were similar whether SLE patients had PH or not, the steady hyperuricemia was associated with the development of PH in SLE patients without PH at baseline. In CTD-PAH, the baseline SUA levels also had a positive correlation with pulmonary vascular resistance, and steady hyperuricemia may predict a worsened clinical prognosis (12). The elevated SUA level may promote pulmonary vascular remodeling through increased oxidative stress, depletion of nitric oxide, endothelial dysfunction, vasoconstriction, and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (7). Although Savale et al. (37) did not find the influence of hyperuricemia in pulmonary vascular remodeling, UA metabolism was also disturbed in the remodeled pulmonary vascular walls in PAH. Moreover, Wang et al. (38) observed that the SUA levels were higher in rheumatoid arthritis patients with ILD than in patients without ILD. The SUA levels were positively correlated with KL-6, a biomarker of ILD. They further explored the involvement of UA in the pathogenesis of ILD through in vitro cellular experiments and found that UA can induce the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in alveolar epithelial cells, which is a critical step in the progression of ILD.
Inflammation may play a key role between elevated uric acid and right heart remodeling. Elevated SUA levels may enhance the inflammatory response and thus affect right cardiac chamber remodeling in patients with CTD. Our data shows that patients in the third tertile had significantly impaired RV GLS and RV GCS as well as RA reservoir and conduit strain parameters compared with those in the first tertile, and RV GLS was also significantly lower in the second tertile—even the first and second tertiles of SUA were in the normal reference range. There was independent association between SUA levels and RV GCS and εe after adjustment for pulmonary fibrosis, PH, RVEF, and other potential confounding factors. Chronic long-term inflammation is one of the main pathological features in patients with CTD and be considered to have a contributing role in cardiovascular involvement as well as is one of the most important causes of elevated SUA levels. Increased SUA can, in turn, exacerbate the inflammatory response, resulting in a vicious cycle (39). Even though SSc-PAH patients have similar pulmonary vascular resistance with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension patients, there was a worse RV function and prognosis in the former (40). The primary myocardial involvement derived by inflammation may be one of the potential causes (41). However, none of these mechanisms is independent. They reinforce and interact with each other, ultimately leading to right cardiac chamber remodeling.
In addition, both SUA levels and right heart remodeling are affected by exercise as a confounding factor. On the one hand, low- and moderate-intensity exercise can improve hyperuricemia (42), but high-intensity exercise may increase uric acid production and reduce excretion, leading to increased SUA (43, 44). On the other hand, long-term and intensive endurance exercise has potential effects on the heart, especially the right side, and even on pulmonary circulation (45). However, only one patient in our cohort has a history of long-term and high-intensity exercise and stopped training in the last 4 years. The effect of exercise was not discussed separately in this study. Nonetheless, previous studies suggested that exercise therapy was beneficial to CTD patients and moderates the side effects of high-dose glucocorticoid treatment (46–48). The influence of exercise on right heart remodeling and finding an appropriate kinesitherapy in CTD patients are worth exploring.
5 Limitation
There are some limitations in this study. First, this was a single-center study with a relatively small sample size. This study did not discuss the different types of CTD separately due to the limitations of the sample size, despite which is a heterogeneous group of diseases. Compared with IIM, other CTDs more likely to combine with PH and myocardial involvement may have more obvious right cardiac chamber remodeling and higher SUA levels. However, the common medications used in CTD patients are similar, including glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants, and based on the different symptoms performed personalized treatment. Second, causality cannot be determined due to the cross-sectional design; longitudinal or interventional studies should be conducted to further explore the causal relationship between SUA levels and right heart remodeling. Third, although we observed a correlation between SUA levels and LV mass index similar to previous studies in other diseases (49–51), we did not investigate the correlation further for the reason that to we focused on the right cardiac chamber remodeling in present study. The relationship between SUA levels and myocardial fibrosis, edema, and microvascular perfusion in patients with CTD has also not been investigated in this study due to the same reason. Subsequent studies need to focus on these aspects. Finally, given the lack of follow-up data on patients with CTD, further follow-up studies should be performed to explore the prognostic value of SUA levels and right heart strain parameters.
6 Conclusion
In summary, SUA may be a potential risk factor of right cardiac chamber remodeling and is independently associated with impaired εe and RV GCS in patients with CTD, which might be used as a non-invasive and low-cost indicator to determine subclinical right cardiac chamber remodeling.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Tongji Medical School Affiliated Tongji Hospital Medical Ethics Committee. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The human samples used in this study were acquired from primarily isolated as part of your previous study for which ethical approval was obtained. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was not obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article because this study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our hospital (TJ-IRB20230914), and the requirement for written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective design.
Author contributions
YT: Methodology, Writing – original draft. ZY: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JW: Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DT: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. YL: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. CX: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. LH: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. LX: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81873889 and 82272109).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2024.1351197/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Vonk MC, Vandecasteele E, van Dijk AP. Pulmonary hypertension in connective tissue diseases, new evidence and challenges. Eur J Clin Invest. (2021) 51:e13453. doi: 10.1111/eci.13453
2. Mira-Avendano I, Abril A, Burger CD, Dellaripa PF, Fischer A, Gotway MB, et al. Interstitial lung disease and other pulmonary manifestations in connective tissue diseases. Mayo Clin Proc. (2019) 94:309–25. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.09.002
3. Xu J, Yang W, Zhao S, Lu M. State-of-the-art myocardial strain by CMR feature tracking: clinical applications and future perspectives. Eur Radiol. (2022) 32:5424–35. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08629-2
4. Vos JL, Butcher SC, Fortuni F, Galloo X, Rodwell L, Vonk MC, et al. The prognostic value of right atrial and right ventricular functional parameters in systemic sclerosis. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2022) 9:845359. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.845359
5. Wu R, Shi RY, An DAL, Chen BH, Jiang M, Bacyinski A, et al. Biventricular tissue tracking demonstrating associations between left ventricular myocardial extracellular volume, pulmonary artery pressure, and reduced right ventricular ejection fraction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using cardiovascular MRI. Clin Radiol. (2020) 75:237.e217–237.e225. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.09.136
6. Bratis K, Lindholm A, Hesselstrand R, Arheden H, Karabela G, Stavropoulos E, et al. CMR feature tracking in cardiac asymptomatic systemic sclerosis: Clinical implications. PloS One. (2019) 14:e0221021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221021
7. Ndrepepa G. Uric acid and cardiovascular disease. Clin Chim Acta. (2018) 484:150–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.05.046
8. Elera-Fitzcarrald C, Reategui-Sokolova C, Gamboa-Cardenas RV, Medina M, Zevallos F, Pimentel-Quiroz VR, et al. Serum uric acid is associated with damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus Sci Med. (2020) 7:e000366. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2019-000366
9. Zou YW, Li QH, Zhu YY, Pan J, Gao JW, Lin JZ, et al. Prevalence and influence of hypouricemia on cardiovascular diseases in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Med Res. (2022) 27:260. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00888-5
10. Castillo-Martínez D, Marroquín-Fabián E, Lozada-Navarro AC, Mora-Ramírez M, Juárez M, Sánchez-Muñoz F, et al. Levels of uric acid may predict the future development of pulmonary hypertension in systemic lupus erythematosus: a seven-year follow-up study. Lupus. (2016) 25:61–6. doi: 10.1177/0961203315600539
11. Kim KJ, Baek IW, Park YJ, Yoon CH, Kim WU, Cho CS. High levels of uric acid in systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with pulmonary hypertension. Int J Rheum Dis. (2015) 18:524–32. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12262
12. Wang J, Wang Y, Li X, Huang Y, Sun X, Wang Q, et al. Serum uric acid is associated with disease severity and may predict clinical outcome in patients of pulmonary arterial hypertension secondary to connective tissue disease in Chinese: a single-center retrospective study. BMC Pulm Med. (2020) 20:272. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01309-1
13. Deng XL, Yi HW, Xiao J, Zhang XF, Zhao J, Sun M, et al. Serum uric acid: A risk factor for right ventricular dysfunction and prognosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2023) 14:1143458. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1143458
14. Lundberg IE, Tjarnlund A, Bottai M, Werth VP, Pilkington C, Visser M, et al. 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups. Ann Rheum Dis. (2017) 76:1955–64. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211468
15. Aringer M, Costenbader K, Daikh D, Brinks R, Mosca M, Ramsey-Goldman R, et al. European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. (2019) 78:1151–9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214819
16. van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. (2013) 72:1747–55. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204424
17. Shiboski CH, Shiboski SC, Seror R, Criswell LA, Labetoulle M, Lietman TM, et al. 2016 American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism classification criteria for primary sjogren's syndrome: A consensus and data-Driven methodology involving three international patient cohorts. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2017) 69:35–45. doi: 10.1002/art.39859
18. Villeneuve E, Nam J, Emery P. 2010 ACR-EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Rev Bras Reumatol. (2010) 50:481–3.
19. Sharp GC, Irvin WS, Tan EM, Gould RG, Holman HR. Mixed connective tissue disease–an apparently distinct rheumatic disease syndrome associated with a specific antibody to an extractable nuclear antigen (ENA). Am J Med. (1972) 52:148–59. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(72)90064-2
20. Humbert M, Kovacs G, Hoeper MM, Badagliacca R, Berger RMF, Brida M, et al. ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. (2022) 44:1312. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00879-2022
21. Qu YY, Buckert D, Ma GS, Rasche V. Quantitative assessment of left and right atrial strains using cardiovascular magnetic resonance based tissue tracking. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2021) 8:690240. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.690240
22. Claus P, Omar AMS, Pedrizzetti G, Sengupta PP, Nagel E. Tissue tracking technology for assessing cardiac mechanics: principles, normal values, and clinical applications. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2015) 8:1444–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.11.001
23. Drosos GC, Vedder D, Houben E, Boekel L, Atzeni F, Badreh S, et al. EULAR recommendations for cardiovascular risk management in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. (2022) 81:768–79. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221733
24. Vonk-Noordegraaf A, Haddad F, Chin KM, Forfia PR, Kawut SM, Lumens J, et al. Right heart adaptation to pulmonary arterial hypertension: physiology and pathobiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2013) 62:D22–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.027
25. Fábián A, Ujvári A, Tokodi M, Lakatos BK, Kiss O, Babity M, et al. Biventricular mechanical pattern of the athlete's heart: comprehensive characterization using three-dimensional echocardiography. Eur J Prev Cardiol. (2022) 29:1594–604. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwac026
26. Sanz J, Sánchez-Quintana D, Bossone E, Bogaard HJ, Naeije R. Anatomy, function, and dysfunction of the right ventricle: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2019) 73:1463–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.076
27. Tezuka F, Hort W, Lange PE, Nürnberg JH. Muscle fiber orientation in the development and regression of right ventricular hypertrophy in pigs. Acta pathol japonica. (1990) 40:402–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.1990.tb01579.x
28. Kind T, Mauritz GJ, Marcus JT, van de Veerdonk M, Westerhof N, Vonk-Noordegraaf A. Right ventricular ejection fraction is better reflected by transverse rather than longitudinal wall motion in pulmonary hypertension. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. (2010) 12:35. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-12-35
29. Pettersen E, Helle-Valle T, Edvardsen T, Lindberg H, Smith HJ, Smevik B, et al. Contraction pattern of the systemic right ventricle shift from longitudinal to circumferential shortening and absent global ventricular torsion. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2007) 49:2450–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.062
30. Gaynor SL, Maniar HS, Prasad SM, Steendijk P, Moon MR. Reservoir and conduit function of right atrium: impact on right ventricular filling and cardiac output. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. (2005) 288:H2140–2145. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00566.2004
31. Gaynor SL, Maniar HS, Bloch JB, Steendijk P, Moon MR. Right atrial and ventricular adaptation to chronic right ventricular pressure overload. Circulation. (2005) 112:I212–218. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.517789
32. Wessels JN, van Wezenbeek J, de Rover J, Smal R, Llucià-Valldeperas A, Celant LR, et al. Right atrial adaptation to precapillary pulmonary hypertension: pressure-volume, cardiomyocyte, and histological analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2023) 82:704–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.063
33. Tello K, Dalmer A, Vanderpool R, Ghofrani HA, Naeije R, Roller F, et al. Right ventricular function correlates of right atrial strain in pulmonary hypertension: a combined cardiac magnetic resonance and conductance catheter study. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. (2020) 318:H156–64. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00485.2019
34. Leng S, Dong Y, Wu Y, Zhao X, Ruan W, Zhang G, et al. Impaired cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived rapid semiautomated right atrial longitudinal strain is associated with decompensated hemodynamics in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. (2019) 12:e008582. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.008582
35. Chikhoune L, Brousseau T, Morell-Dubois S, Farhat MM, Maillard H, Ledoult E, et al. Association between routine laboratory parameters and the severity and progression of systemic sclerosis. J Clin Med. (2022) 11:5087. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175087
36. Simpson CE, Damico RL, Hummers L, Khair RM, Kolb TM, Hassoun PM, et al. Serum uric acid as a marker of disease risk, severity, and survival in systemic sclerosis-related pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pulmon Circ. (2019) 9:2045894019859477. doi: 10.1177/2045894019859477
37. Savale L, Akagi S, Tu L, Cumont A, Thuillet R, Phan C, et al. Serum and pulmonary uric acid in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J. (2021) 58:2000332. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00332-2020
38. Wang Z, Wang W, Xiang T, Gong B, Xie J. Serum uric acid as a diagnostic biomarker for rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease. Inflammation. (2022) 45:1800–14. doi: 10.1007/s10753-022-01661-w
39. Aghdashi M, Behnemoon M, Mahmoodi Rad J, Rabiepour M. Evaluation of serum uric acid level in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with normal and high pulmonary arterial hypertension. Biomed (Taipei). (2018) 8:16. doi: 10.1051/bmdcn/2018080316
40. Tedford RJ, Mudd JO, Girgis RE, Mathai SC, Zaiman AL, Housten-Harris T. Right ventricular dysfunction in systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circ Heart fail. (2013) 6:953–63. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000008
41. Overbeek MJ, Mouchaers KT, Niessen HM, Hadi AM, Kupreishvili K, Boonstra A, et al. Characteristics of interstitial fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration in right ventricles of systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension. Int J Rheumatol. (2010) 2010:604615. doi: 10.1155/2010/604615
42. Hou Y, Ma R, Gao S, Kaudimba KK, Yan H, Liu T, et al. The effect of low and moderate exercise on hyperuricemia: protocol for a randomized controlled study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2021) 12:716802. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.716802
43. Green HJ, Fraser IG. Differential effects of exercise intensity on serum uric acid concentration. Med Sci sports Exercise. (1988) 20:55–9. doi: 10.1249/00005768-198802000-00008
44. Huang LL, Huang CT, Chen ML, Mao IF. Effects of profuse sweating induced by exercise on urinary uric acid excretion in a hot environment. Chin J Physiol. (2010) 53:254–61. doi: 10.4077/CJP.2010.AMK060
45. Domenech-Ximenos B, Garza MS, Prat-Gonzalez S, Sepulveda-Martinez A, Crispi F, Perea RJ, et al. Exercise-induced cardio-pulmonary remodelling in endurance athletes: Not only the heart adapts. Eur J Prev Cardiol. (2020) 27:651–9. doi: 10.1177/2047487319868545
46. Hu H, Xu A, Gao C, Wang Z, Wu X. The effect of physical exercise on rheumatoid arthritis: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs. (2021) 77:506–22. doi: 10.1111/jan.14574
47. Dowman LM, McDonald CF, Hill CJ, Lee AL, Barker K, Boote C, et al. The evidence of benefits of exercise training in interstitial lung disease: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax. (2017) 72:610–9. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208638
48. Nagashima M, Takahashi D, Mizushima T, Yamauchi K. Effects of exercise in patients with connective tissue disease receiving high-dose glucocorticoids: A pilot prospective cohort study. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2021) 121:2253–63. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04697-2
49. Zhang C, Liu R, Yuan J, Cui J, Hu F, Yang W, et al. Gender-related differences in the association between serum uric acid and left ventricular mass index in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Biol Sex Differ. (2016) 7:22. doi: 10.1186/s13293-016-0074-x
50. Yoshitomi R, Fukui A, Nakayama M, Ura Y, Ikeda H, Oniki H, et al. Sex differences in the association between serum uric acid levels and cardiac hypertrophy in patients with chronic kidney disease. Hypertens Res. (2014) 37:246–52. doi: 10.1038/hr.2013.134
Keywords: connective tissue disease, serum uric acid, cardiovascular resonance magnetic imaging, feature tracking, right ventricular strain, right atrial strain
Citation: Tang Y, Yang Z, Wen J, Tang D, Luo Y, Xiang C, Huang L and Xia L (2024) Association of serum uric acid with right cardiac chamber remodeling assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking in patients with connective tissue disease. Front. Endocrinol. 15:1351197. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1351197
Received: 06 December 2023; Accepted: 01 March 2024;
Published: 22 March 2024.
Edited by:
Daigo Sawaki, Jichi Medical University, JapanReviewed by:
Shaoyi Zhang, University of California, San Francisco, United StatesGiuseppe Mascia, University of Genoa, Italy
Copyright © 2024 Tang, Yang, Wen, Tang, Luo, Xiang, Huang and Xia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Liming Xia, xialiming2017@outlook.com