Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol., 26 April 2024
Sec. Systems Endocrinology
This article is part of the Research Topic Circadian Rhythm in Adrenal Endocrinology View all articles

The association between circadian syndrome and chronic kidney disease in an aging population: a 4-year follow-up study

Yang Xiong&#x;Yang Xiong1†Qian Zhong&#x;Qian Zhong2†Yangchang ZhangYangchang Zhang3Zhihong Liu*Zhihong Liu1*Xianding Wang,*Xianding Wang1,4*
  • 1Department of Urology and Andrology Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • 2Department of Endocrinology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • 3Department of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 4Kidney Transplant Center, Transplant Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Introduction: Circadian syndrome (CircS) is proposed as a novel risk cluster based on reduced sleep duration, abdominal obesity, depression, hypertension, dyslipidemia and hyperglycemia. However, the association between CircS and chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unclear. To investigate the cross-sectional and longitudinal association between CircS and CKD, this study was performed.

Methods: A national prospective cohort (China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, CHARLS) was used in this study. To define CKD, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated based on the 2012 CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation. Participants with eGFR <60 mL.min-1/1.73/m2 were diagnosed with CKD. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to assess the cross-sectional association between CircS and CKD. Subgroup and interactive analyses were performed to determine the interactive effects of covariates. In the sensitivity analysis, the obese population was excluded and another method for calculating the eGFR was used to verify the robustness of previous findings. In addition, participants without CKD at baseline were followed up for four years to investigate the longitudinal relationship between CircS and CKD.

Results: A total of 6355 participants were included in this study. In the full model, CircS was positively associated with CKD (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.04-1.59, P < 0.05). As per one increase of CircS components, there was a 1.11-fold (95% CI = 1.04-1.18, P < 0.05) risk of prevalent CKD in the full model. A significant interactive effect of hyperuricemia in the CircS-CKD association (P for interaction < 0.01) was observed. Sensitivity analyses excluding the obese population and using the 2009 CKD-EPI creatinine equation to diagnose CKD supported the positive correlation between CircS and CKD. In the 2011-2015 follow-up cohort, the CircS group had a 2.18-fold risk of incident CKD (95% CI = 1.33-3.58, P < 0.01) in the full model. The OR was 1.29 (95% CI = 1.10-1.51, P < 0.001) with per one increase of CircS components.

Conclusion: CircS is a risk factor for CKD and may serve as a predictor of CKD for early identification and intervention.

1 Introduction

Throughout history, scholars and researchers have diligently investigated the correlation between the circadian clock system and both diseases and individuals’ physiological states (1). The term “circadian syndrome (CircS)” is employed to denote the phenomenon through which living organisms, spanning multiple hierarchical levels, from molecules and cells to organisms and populations, have undergone adaptive evolutionary processes resulting in the emergence of periodic fluctuations in their life activities as a response to diurnal oscillations in their environmental conditions (2). The concept of CircS is grounded in compelling evidence that several chronic disorders, including obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes, depression, sleep disorders, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, are strongly associated with circadian rhythms (3). CircS serves as the principal regulator influencing nearly every facet of human health and metabolism (1). Various physiological parameters within the human body, encompassing metrics such as pulse rate, body temperature, blood pressure, physical endurance, emotional states, cognitive function, metabolism, organ function, hormone secretion, immunity, and the cell cycle, exhibit periodic fluctuations synchronized with diurnal and nocturnal shifts (46).

The central pacemaker of the circadian clock resides within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the brain and synchronizes with external cues, primarily light (2). The central clock synchronizes peripheral clocks located in various regions of the brain and tissues throughout the body, utilizing both neuronal and humoral signaling pathways. While light holds dominance as the Zeitgeber for central clock entrainment, metabolic cues are likely to function as supplementary Zeitgebers for peripheral clocks, particularly those situated in the liver and kidneys (4, 7). It has been confirmed that the kidneys exhibit circadian rhythms, with functions such as urine volume, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), sodium excretion, renal plasma flow (RPF), urine protein excretion rate, urine electrolyte excretion rate, blood pressure, glucocorticoids, erythropoietin, endothelin, and others showing circadian variations (710). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an umbrella term for various kidney diseases characterized by irreversible structural and functional abnormalities lasting for several months (11). The prevailing criteria employed in the adult population for defining CKD encompass: (1) evidence of kidney impairment, frequently identified through an elevated urine albumin (or protein)-to-creatinine ratio (ACR); or (2) diminished kidney function, characterized by a GFR below 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. GFR is considered the best determinant of kidney function (12). CKD’s main causes vary by region, with diabetes being a leading factor in white individuals, while glomerulonephritis plays a significant role in Asia, but microvasculature dysfunction is a common underlying mechanism (13).

Currently, there is increasing evidence suggesting that modern lifestyles (such as sleep deprivation, lack of physical activity, high-energy diets, and shift work) and the use of artificial lighting can disrupt circadian rhythms, leading to various health consequences and potentially being important factors in the development of CKD (3, 14). Daily rhythmicity is essential for optimal kidney function, as the kidney houses one of the most active peripheral clocks. Disruptions in circadian rhythms have been linked to the onset of CKD in both human studies and animal models (15). Studies by Knutson et al. (16) reported an association between poor sleep quality and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and higher urine protein to creatinine ratio (PCR) in patients with mild to moderate CKD. A cross-sectional study involving Chinese participants also found an association between poor sleep quality and higher odds of being at high risk for CKD and proteinuria (17). Additionally, cardiovascular events such as arrhythmias and acute myocardial infarctions, as the leading causes of death in CKD patients, also exhibit circadian rhythm characteristics, with higher incidences occurring at night and in the early morning (18). Conversely, CKD can further exacerbate circadian rhythm disturbances. A study in Spain showed that CKD patients had a higher proportion of disrupted blood pressure circadian rhythms, and this condition increased the risk of entering end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (19). In addition, some scholars have found that hemodialysis patients experience circadian rhythm disruption in peripheral tissues, manifesting as diminished nocturnal sleep quality, increased daytime sleepiness, and alterations in circadian biomarkers, such as melatonin (20).

Therefore, CircS may be considered a new cluster of risk factors for chronic kidney disease. However, there is currently no research indicating the relationship between CircS and CKD. The purpose of this study is to use data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) to address this question.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Data sources and study populations

This study derived from CHARLS, which is an ongoing longitudinal survey in the Chinese aging population. Initiated in 2011, CHARLS used the probabilities proportional to size method to sample across China. The included participants were all invited to receive a follow-up every 2-3 years. To date, CHARLS has launched four waves of investigation in 2011, 2013, 2015 and 2018. However, only the 2011 and 2015 surveys collected blood samples. Thus, we used the two waves to construct the longitudinal cohort. A more detailed description of CHARLS can be found in the protocol of the CHARLS project or the official website (http://charls.pku.edu.cn/) (21). The ethical review board of Peking University meticulously examined and subsequently sanctioned this study (IRB 00001052-11014; Beijing, China). Prior to their participation in this study, written and oral informed consent was obtained from all participants.

In the baseline survey, CHARLS sampled 17705 participants from 28 provinces. As shown in Figure 1, participants aged <40 years, under non-fasting status and having incomplete information to diagnose CircS and CKD were excluded. Finally, 6355 participants were included in the cross-sectional analysis. Among them, 3101 participants were followed up to 2015 and then included in the longitudinal analysis.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Overview of the study design and analysis strategy. In CHARLS, we first investigated the cross-sectional association between CircS and prevalent CKD in 2011 and the longitudinal association was explored in a four-year follow-up survey from 2011-2015.

2.2 Measurements of CircS and CKD

Derived from metabolic syndrome, the concept of CircS is built based on seven components: reduced sleep duration, depression, central obesity, elevated triglycerides, decreased HDL, hypertension and hyperglycemia. Participants with at least four components simultaneously are defined as having CircS (3). The duration of sleep was evaluated through individual self-reporting, and a sleep duration of less than six hours was classified as reduced sleep duration. Depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale-10 (CESD-10) questionnaire (22). Participants with scores ≥10 were diagnosed with depression. Central obesity was defined as waist circumference ≥85 cm for males and ≥80 cm for females.

To determine the concentrations of triglycerides, HDL and blood glucose in fasting status, all the participants were asked to fast overnight. The next morning, venous blood was collected by medical staff and centrifuged to separate the plasma. Participants under non-fasting status were not excluded in this step; however, they were labeled and subsequently excluded from the formal analysis. The collected plasma was immediately stored at −20°C and then transported to −80°C for long-term preservation. All determinations were performed at the Capital Medical University laboratory using enzymatic colorimetric tests. According to one previous study, elevated triglyceride was defined as triglycerides ≥150 mg dL−1 or drug treatment for elevated triglycerides (3). Reduced HDL was defined as HDL <40 mg dL−1 for males or <50 mg dL−1 for females or drug treatment for reduced HDL. Elevated fasting glucose was defined as ≥100 mg dL−1 or drug treatment of elevated glucose. To measure the blood pressure, the participants were asked to be relaxed and seated for a while. Blood pressure was assessed three times by experienced nurses using a HEM-7200 electronic monitor (Omron, Dalian). The average of three measurements was used as the final blood pressure. Hypertension was defined as systolic pressure ≥140 mmHg or diastolic pressure ≥90 mmHg or drug treatment of hypertension. All medication history was based on the patient’s self-report.

To define CKD, we first calculated the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on the 2012 CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation (23). Patients with eGFR <60 mL min-1/1.73/m2 were diagnosed with CKD (24).

2.3 Measurements of covariates

Some covariates, including demographic variables, lifestyle variables and blood biomarkers were collected in the baseline survey. Demographic variables included age (years), educational levels (literate and illiterate) and marital status (married with spouse/cohabitating versus divorced/separated/widowed). Here, illiterate refers to participants who received less than an elementary school education. Lifestyle factors comprised afternoon nap (yes or no), cigarette consumption (current, never or ex-smoker) and alcohol consumption (more than once a month, less than once a month, and never). Blood biomarkers consisted of low-density lipoprotein (LDL, mg/dL), total cholesterol (mg/dL), hyperuricemia, C-reactive protein (CRP, mg/L) and hemoglobin (g/dL). Hyperuricemia was defined as blood uric acid >420 μmol/L for males and >360 μmol/L for females (25).

2.4 Statistic analysis

The baseline characteristics of the participants were summarized according to the status of CircS (normal group versus CircS group). Continuous variables with normal distribution were displayed as mean ± standard deviation and those with non-normal distribution were displayed as median (25%-75% quartiles). Categorical variables were showed as proportions (%). The differences between the two groups were tested using t-test, Wilcoxon test or Chi-square test according to the data types.

To evaluate the cross-sectional association between CircS and CKD, binary logistic regression was used. A set of models was constructed by adjusting different covariates: Model 1 – crude model; Model 2 - adjusting for age, gender, marital status and educational levels; Model 3 – further adjusting for cigarette and alcohol consumption and afternoon nap; Model 4 – adjusting for blood biomarkers, including LDL, total cholesterol, hyperuricemia, CRP and hemoglobin. The participants were followed up to 2015 to investigate the longitudinal association between CircS and CKD.

In addition, some sensitivity analyses were performed. First, we used the number of CircS components as a continuous variable to verify the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations. Second, subgroup and interactive analyses were performed to explore the potential interactive effects of covariates. Third, we excluded the obese population (body mass index ≥28.0 Kg/m2) to verify the association between CircS and CKD in the non-obese population. Finally, given that there is no consensus in the equation for estimating eGFR, we also used the 2009 CKD-EPI creatinine equation to calculate the eGFR as a sensitivity analysis (23).

All analyses in this study were performed using R 4.0.2 software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). A P-value < 0.05 (two-sided) indicates statistical significance.

3 Results

3.1 Characteristics of participants attending the 2011 CHARLS baseline survey

As shown in Figure 1, 6355 participants were included in the baseline survey. Among them, 2506 participants were diagnosed with CircS, and 3849 were not (Table 1). The CircS group tended to be older, female, divorced/separated/widowed, illiterate, have less cigarette and alcohol consumption and have higher LDL, total cholesterol, CRP, uric acid and hemoglobin (all P < 0.05).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants attending the CHARLS survey in 2011.

3.2 The cross-sectional association between CircS and prevalent CKD

The CircS group had a significantly higher risk of prevalent CKD (Table 2). In the crude model, the CircS group had a 1.42-fold risk of prevalent CKD (95% CI = 1.20-1.69, P < 0.001). After adjusting for different covariates, the ORs were 1.39 (95% CI = 1.14-1.69, P = 0.001), 1.38 (95% CI = 1.13-1.68, P = 0.002) and 1.28 (95% CI = 1.04-1.59, P < 0.05) in model 2, model 3 and the full model (model 4), respectively. As a continuous variable, the ORs were 1.16 (95% CI = 1.10-1.22, P < 0.001), 1.14 (95% CI = 1.07-1.21, P < 0.001), 1.14 (95% CI = 1.07-1.21, P < 0.001), and 1.11 (95% CI = 1.04-1.18, P < 0.05) in the crude model (model 1), model 2, model 3 and the full model (model 4), respectively.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 The cross-sectional association between CircS and prevalent CKD.

3.3 Association between CircS and prevalent CKD in subgroup and interactive analyses

In the subgroup analysis (Figure 2), an increased risk of prevalent CKD was observed in participants aged ≥60 years (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.08-1.67, P = 0.007), being married/cohabitating (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.01-1.62, P = 0.043) and not having hyperuricemia (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.12-1.73, P = 0.002). Notably, the CircS group had a decreased risk of prevalent CKD for participants with hyperuricemia (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.29-0.89, P = 0.018). there was a significant interactive effect of hyperuricemia in the CircS-CKD association (P for interaction < 0.01).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Association between CircS and prevalent CKD in subgroup and interactive analyses. In the multivariable logistic regression models, covariates were adjusted as model 4 in previous analyses except for subgroup variables.

3.4 Association between CircS and prevalent CKD in the non-obese population

To assess the association between CircS and prevalent CKD in the non-obese population, an additional sensitivity analysis was conducted in which participants with obesity (body mass index ≥28.0 Kg/m2) were excluded (Table 3). The CircS group had a significantly higher risk of prevalent CKD in the crude model (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.28-1.85, P < 0.001) and the full model (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.11-1.74, P < 0.01). As a continuous variable, it was found that as per one increase of CircS components, the ORs were 1.20 (95% CI = 1.13-1.26, P < 0.001) in the crude model and 1.14 (95% CI = 1.06-1.23, P < 0.001) in the full model. In the non-obese population, CircS was also positively associated with prevalent CKD.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 The cross-sectional association between CircS and prevalent CKD in the non-obese population.

3.5 Association between CircS and prevalent CKD using the 2009 CKD-EPI creatinine equation

Given that there is no consensus in the equation for estimating eGFR, we also used the 2009 CKD-EPI creatinine equation to calculate the eGFR as a sensitivity analysis (Table 4). Using the new equation to calculate eGFR and further diagnose CKD, the CircS group still displayed a significantly higher risk of prevalent CKD in the crude model (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.35-2.19, P < 0.001) and the full model (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.07-1.89, P < 0.05). As a continuous variable, it was found that with per one increase of CircS components, the ORs were 1.22 (95% CI = 1.13-1.31, P < 0.001) in the crude model and 1.10 (95% CI = 1.01-1.21, P < 0.001) in the full model. The positive correlation between CircS and CKD was still valid.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4 The cross-sectional association between CircS and prevalent CKD using 2009 CKD-EPI creatine equation.

3.6 The longitudinal association between CircS and incident CKD

To investigate the longitudinal association between CircS and incident CKD, a 2011-2015 follow-up cohort was constructed. The elderly population without CKD in 2011 were further followed up for four years to investigate the occurrence of incident CKD in 2015. As summarized in Table 5, the CircS group had a 2.36-fold risk of incident CKD (95% CI = 1.50-3.73, P < 0.001) in the crude model. After adjusting for different covariates, the ORs for incident CKD were 2.26 (95% CI = 1.41-3.62, P < 0.001), 2.28 (95% CI = 1.42-3.67, P < 0.001) and 2.18 (95% CI = 1.33-3.58, P < 0.01) in model 2, model 3 and the full model (model 4), respectively. As a continuous variable, the ORs were 1.31 (95% CI = 1.14-1.50, P < 0.001), 1.28 (95% CI = 1.11-1.48, P < 0.001), 1.29 (95% CI = 1.11-1.49, P < 0.001), and 1.29 (95% CI = 1.10-1.51, P < 0.001) in the crude model (model 1), model 2, model 3 and the full model (model 4), respectively.

Table 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5 The longitudinal association between CircS and incident CKD.

4 Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the longitudinal association between CircS and CKD among the elderly population aged over 40 years in Chinese communities using nationally representative data. In this population-based prospective cohort study, we observed a positive association between CircS and CKD in the cross-sectional analyses. After a 4-year follow-up period, newly developed CKD was significantly associated with CircS.

Previous research on CircS and CKD has primarily concentrated on specific behaviors, such as irregular or short-duration sleep, shift work, and exposure to artificial lighting (26). Fewer studies have utilized the concept of CircS to categorize individuals and investigate its relationship with health outcomes. Regarding the relationship between sleep duration and physical health issues, numerous studies have demonstrated that individuals who sleep for a short duration (< 6 hours per night) have an elevated risk of hypertension (RR 3.59, 95% CI 1.58-8.17) and CKD (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.28-2.08) when compared to those who report sleeping 7 hours per night (15, 27, 28). A cohort study indicated a significant association between long-term night shift work and early kidney dysfunction in steelworkers (29). Another observational study found that a minor increase in albuminuria, which serves as an indicator of kidney damage, was linked to the disruption of circadian rhythms caused by shift work, rather than exposure to low levels of nephrotoxic chemicals (30). Concurrently, epidemiological investigations have revealed a higher prevalence of CKD among individuals with either excessively long or short sleep duration, with 7-8 hours of sleep being considered more appropriate (31). Follow-up studies of CKD patients have also shown that those who experience sleep deprivation or deteriorating sleep quality tend to experience a faster decline in eGFR and are more susceptible to progressing to ESKD (32). Additionally, a prospective and longitudinal study involving CKD patients demonstrated that depressive symptoms at baseline are linked to progression to ESRD, mortality, or hospitalization in CKD patients (33). In our study, we also found a longitudinal association between CircS and incident CKD, providing more evidence in this topic. However, this study was performed in the aging Chinese individuals, needing further verification in the overall population.

In our study, baseline survey results indicated that individuals in the CircS group tended to be older, female, divorced/separated/widowed, illiterate, less likely to smoke and drink alcohol, but had higher BMI, LDL, total cholesterol, CRP, uric acid, and hemoglobin levels. They also had a higher prevalence of depression, reduced sleep duration, and hypertension. It may be speculated that women experiencing menopause, shorter sleep duration, and depression are at a higher risk of CKD. However, surprisingly, subgroup analysis revealed an increased risk of prevalent CKD among married or cohabiting participants. This suggests that divorce, separation, or widowhood may play a protective role. One could hypothesize that these life changes might alleviate certain stressors such as family disputes, household responsibilities, or unhealthy relationships, while also prompting individuals to pay greater attention to their health and adopt healthier lifestyles. These factors may collectively contribute to a reduced risk of CKD. It’s important to emphasize that our study is observational in nature and cannot establish causation. Additionally, the relationship between these factors and CKD may be influenced by other underlying variables, necessitating further research for a deeper understanding of this association.

One fundamental assumption explaining these associations is the potential misalignment between external behavioral patterns and endogenous molecular circadian clocks. Kidneys possess peripheral circadian clocks that facilitate the self-sustained rhythmicity of the glomerular filtration rate (29). Studies have demonstrated that the mammalian circadian system operates as a hierarchical multi-oscillator structure (34). The central clock, situated in the SCN of the hypothalamus, orchestrates peripheral clocks distributed throughout the body (2). Given that light serves as the primary external cue for synchronizing the central circadian clock in the SCN (29), it is reasonable to hypothesize that chronic circadian disruption resulting from factors such as shift work, irregular sleep patterns, or artificial lighting may exert an influence on peripheral oscillators, potentially leading to a decrease in eGFR. Another plausible mechanism through which CircS may contribute to declining eGFR involves the presence of psychological and psychosocial stressors (35). Stress can induce renal vasoconstriction by stimulating the sympathetic nervous system, resulting in reduced RPF and GFR (29). Furthermore, persistent activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis due to chronic external stressors associated with CircS can activate the sympathetic nervous system. Activation of the renal SNS, in turn, may impact renal function through the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) (36). It has been observed that individuals with sleep disorders exhibit heightened daytime sympathetic nervous system activity (37) and fail to enhance cardiac vagal tone during the transition from wakefulness to non-rapid eye movement (38). Moreover, the overactivation of the RAAS not only leads to an increase in intra-glomerular pressure but also damages vascular endothelial cells, activates reactive oxygen species (ROS), and inhibits sympathetic hyperactivity and nitric oxide (NO), all of which are well-established risk factors for renal damage (39, 40).

Furthermore, canonical clock genes such as Clock, Bmal1, Rev-erbα, Cry1, Cry2, Per1, and Per2 exhibit cyclical expression and/or activity within cells, driving cell-autonomous circadian rhythms (8, 41, 42). Clock genes play a crucial regulatory role in the inflammatory response, and therefore (43), CircS may lead to systemic inflammation, which could result in endothelial dysfunction within glomeruli and subsequent renal impairment, thereby promoting CKD progression. For instance, the circadian clock protein BMAL1 regulates interleukin-1β (IL-1β) in macrophages through the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway (44). Nrf2 expression is upregulated in the glomeruli of lupus nephritis (LN) patients, and in LN mouse models, Nrf2 mitigates LN by inhibiting oxidative injury and the NF-κB-mediated inflammatory response (45). Additionally, hypertension is a significant etiological factor for CKD development and progression (46), particularly with mean sleep systolic blood pressure recognized as one of the most important independent predictors of CKD (47). For every one standard deviation decrease in mean sleep systolic blood pressure, the risk of CKD decreases by 27% (48). Normal blood pressure exhibits a clear circadian rhythm, with elevated blood pressure upon awakening in the morning and a decrease during nocturnal sleep (41, 49). This rhythmicity is regulated by various factors with circadian patterns, including environmental cues, the nervous system, the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis, vascular factors, and the kidneys (49). Consequently, disruptions in circadian rhythms that lead to non-dipping nocturnal blood pressure (non-dipper hypertension) are associated with the occurrence and progression of CKD, although the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear (50, 51).

The limitations of this study include the lack of repeated measurements for CircS and some potential covariates. Additionally, the follow-up period was relatively short, and a 4-year follow-up may not be sufficient to detect more pronounced effects of CircS. All sleep information was collected through self-reports, which may be subject to recall bias and misclassification, rather than objective measurements of sleep parameters. Future research should focus on objective sleep monitoring methods, such as polysomnography (52), wrist actigraphy and sleep diaries (31). Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) was initially proposed as a component of CircS (53). It is well-known that the prevalence of NAFLD in China is high (approximately 20%) (54). However, we did not have information about NAFLD in our study. Finally, because our study participants were Chinese, the generalizability of our findings may be limited by ethnic differences. Future research should examine whether our findings can be applied to other populations. Despite these limitations, our study had a large sample size, was nationally representative, had a high follow-up rate, and collected detailed data for each participant. Furthermore, we adjusted for a wide range of covariates to explore the independent influence of CircS on the incidence of CKD.

5 Conclusion

In summary, our study was conducted in a middle-aged and elderly Chinese population and provided evidence that CircS is a risk factor for CKD. However, the mechanisms by which CircS leads to CKD require further investigation.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics statement

The ethical review board of Peking University meticulously examined and subsequently sanctioned this study (IRB 00001052-11014). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

YX: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Software, Methodology, Formal Analysis. QZ: Writing – original draft, Formal Analysis, Conceptualization. YZ: Writing – review & editing, Software, Project administration, Methodology, Formal Analysis. ZL: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization. XW: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the 1.3.5 Project for Disciplines of Excellence-Clinical Research Incubation Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (No. 2021HXFH007), and Sichuan Science and Technology Program (No. 2023YFS0256).

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank the authors who shared the original dataset in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Zimmet P, Alberti KGMM, Stern N, Bilu C, El-Osta A, Einat H, Kronfeld-Schor N, et al. The Circadian Syndrome: is the Metabolic Syndrome and much more! J Intern Med. (2019) 286:181–91. doi: 10.1111/joim.12924

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Honma S. The mammalian circadian system: a hierarchical multi-oscillator structure for generating circadian rhythm. J Physiol Sci. (2018) 68:207–19. doi: 10.1007/s12576-018-0597-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Shi Z, Tuomilehto J, Kronfeld-Schor N, Alberti GK, Stern N, El-Osta A, et al. The circadian syndrome predicts cardiovascular disease better than metabolic syndrome in Chinese adults. J Internal Med. (2021) 289:851–60. doi: 10.1111/joim.13204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Egstrand S, Mace ML, Olgaard K, Lewin E. The vascular circadian clock in chronic kidney disease. Cells. (2021) 10:1769. doi: 10.3390/cells10071769

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Egstrand S, Olgaard K, Lewin E. Circadian rhythms of mineral metabolism in chronic kidney disease–mineral bone disorder. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertension. (2020) 29:367–77. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000611

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Farshadi E, van der Horst GTJ, Chaves I. Molecular links between the circadian clock and the cell cycle. J Mol Biol. (2020) 432:3515–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.04.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Solocinski K, Gumz ML. The circadian clock in the regulation of renal rhythms. J Biol Rhythms. (2015) 30:470–86. doi: 10.1177/0748730415610879

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Firsov D, Bonny O. Circadian rhythms and the kidney. Nat Rev Nephrol. (2018) 14:626–35. doi: 10.1038/s41581-018-0048-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Mohandas R, Douma LG, Scindia Y, Gumz ML. Circadian rhythms and renal pathophysiology. J Clin Invest. (2022) 132:e148277. doi: 10.1172/JCI148277

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Johnston JG, Pollock DM. Circadian regulation of renal function. Free Radic Biol Med. (2018) 119:93–107. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.01.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Drawz P, Rahman M. Chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med. (2015) 162:ITC1–ITC16. doi: 10.7326/AITC201506020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Delanaye P, Jager KJ, Bökenkamp A, Christensson A, Dubourg L, Eriksen BO, et al. CKD: A call for an age-adapted definition. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2019) 30:1785–805. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019030238

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Wilson S, Mone P, Jankauskas SS, Gambardella J, Santulli G. Chronic kidney disease: Definition, updated epidemiology, staging, and mechanisms of increased cardiovascular risk. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). (2021) 23:831–4. doi: 10.1111/jch.14186

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Xiong Y, Zhang F, Wu C, Zhang Y, Huang X, Qin F, et al. The circadian syndrome predicts lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia better than metabolic syndrome in aging males: A 4-year follow-up study. Front Med (Lausanne). (2021) 8:715830. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.715830

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Carriazo S, Ramos AM, Sanz AB, Sanchez-Niño MD, Kanbay M, Ortiz A. Chronodisruption: A poorly recognized feature of CKD. Toxins (Basel). (2020) 12:151. doi: 10.3390/toxins12030151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Knutson KL, Lash J, Ricardo AC, Herdegen J, Thornton JD, Rahman M, et al. Habitual sleep and kidney function in chronic kidney disease: the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort study. J Sleep Res. (2018) 27:281–9. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12573

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Li J, Huang Z, Hou J, Sawyer AM, Wu Z, Cai J, et al. Sleep and CKD in chinese adults: A cross-sectional study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2017) 12:885–92. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09270816

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Crnko S, Du Pré BC, Sluijter JPG, Van Laake LW. Circadian rhythms and the molecular clock in cardiovascular biology and disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2019) 16:437–47. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0167-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Mojón A, Ayala DE, Piñeiro L, Otero A, Crespo JJ, Moyá A, et al. Comparison of ambulatory blood pressure parameters of hypertensive patients with and without chronic kidney disease. Chronobiol Int. (2013) 30:145–58. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2012.703083

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Russcher M, Chaves I, Lech K, Koch BC, Nagtegaal JE, Dorsman KF, et al. An observational study on disturbed peripheral circadian rhythms in hemodialysis patients. Chronobiol Int. (2015) 32:848–57. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2015.1048868

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Zhao Y, Hu Y, Smith JP, Strauss J, Yang G. Cohort profile: the China health and retirement longitudinal study (CHARLS). Int J Epidemiol. (2014) 43:61–8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys203

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Xiong Y, Zhang YC, Jin T, Qin F, Yuan JH. Depressive males have higher odds of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching. Asian J Androl. (2021) 23:633–9. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_12_21

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Inker LA, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H, Eckfeldt JH, Feldman HI, Greene T, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. New Engl J Med. (2012) 367:20–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114248

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Webster AC, Nagler EV, Morton RL, Masson P. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet. (2017) 389:1238–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32064-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Yang Y, Piao W, Huang K, Fang H, Ju L, Zhao L, et al. Dietary pattern associated with the risk of hyperuricemia in chinese elderly: result from China nutrition and health surveillance 2015–2017. Nutrients. (2022) 14:844. doi: 10.3390/nu14040844

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Shi Z, Tuomilehto J, Kronfeld-Schor N, Alberti G, Stern N, El-Osta A, et al. The Circadian Syndrome Is a Significant and Stronger Predictor for Cardiovascular Disease than the Metabolic Syndrome-The NHANES Survey during 2005-2016. Nutrients. (2022) 14:5317. doi: 10.3390/nu14245317

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Bathgate CJ, Edinger JD, Wyatt JK, Krystal AD. Objective but not subjective short sleep duration associated with increased risk for hypertension in individuals with insomnia. Sleep. (2016) 39:1037–45. doi: 10.5665/sleep.5748

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Sun J, Chen Y, Sun Y, Yang B, Zhou J. Short sleep duration associated with increased risk for new-onset cardiovascular diseases in individuals with metabolic syndromes: Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2022) 9:1010941. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1010941

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Zhang S, Wang Y, Zhu Y, Li X, Song Y, Yuan J. Rotating night shift work, exposure to light at night, and glomerular filtration rate: baseline results from a chinese occupational cohort. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:9035. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Boogaard PJ, Caubo ME. Increased albumin excretion in industrial workers due to shift work rather than to prolonged exposure to low concentrations of chlorinated hydrocarbons. Occup Environ Med. (1994) 51:638–41. doi: 10.1136/oem.51.9.638

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Petrov ME, Buman MP, Unruh ML, Baldwin CM, Jeong M, Reynaga-Ornelas L, et al. Association of sleep duration with kidney function and albuminuria: NHANES 2009-2012. Sleep Health. (2016) 2:75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2015.12.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Yamamoto R, Shinzawa M, Isaka Y, Yamakoshi E, Imai E, Ohashi Y, et al. Sleep quality and sleep duration with CKD are associated with progression to ESKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2018) 13:1825–32. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01340118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Tsai YC, Chiu YW, Hung CC, Hwang SJ, Tsai JC, Wang SL, et al. Association of symptoms of depression with progression of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. (2012) 60:54–61. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.02.325

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Takahashi N, Hirata Y, Aihara K, Mas P. A hierarchical multi-oscillator network orchestrates the Arabidopsis circadian system. Cell. (2015) 163:148–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.062

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Thomas C, Power C. Shift work and risk factors for cardiovascular disease: a study at age 45 years in the 1958 British birth cohort. Eur J Epidemiol. (2010) 25:305–14. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9438-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. DiBona GF. Nervous kidney. Interaction between renal sympathetic nerves and the renin-angiotensin system in the control of renal function. Hypertension. (2000) 36:1083–8. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.36.6.1083

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Somers VK, Dyken ME, Clary MP, Abboud FM. Sympathetic neural mechanisms in obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Invest. (1995) 96:1897–904. doi: 10.1172/JCI118235

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Roumelioti ME, Ranpuria R, Hall M, Hotchkiss JR, Chan CT, Unruh ML, et al. Abnormal nocturnal heart rate variability response among chronic kidney disease and dialysis patients during wakefulness and sleep. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2010) 25:3733–41. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq234

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Oberleithner H. Aldosterone makes human endothelium stiff and vulnerable. Kidney Int. (2005) 67:1680–2. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00263.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Ishigaki S, Ohashi N, Isobe S, Tsuji N, Iwakura T, Ono M, et al. Impaired endogenous nighttime melatonin secretion relates to intrarenal renin-angiotensin system activation and renal damage in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Exp Nephrol. (2016) 20:878–84. doi: 10.1007/s10157-015-1224-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Stow LR, Gumz ML. The circadian clock in the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2011) 22:598–604. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010080803

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Myung J, Wu MY, Lee CY, Rahim AR, Truong VH, Wu D, et al. The kidney clock contributes to timekeeping by the master circadian clock. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:2765. doi: 10.3390/ijms20112765

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Xu H, Huang L, Zhao J, Chen S, Liu J, Li G. The circadian clock and inflammation: A new insight. Clin Chim Acta. (2021) 512:12–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.11.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Early JO, Menon D, Wyse CA, Cervantes-Silva MP, Zaslona Z, Carroll RG, et al. Circadian clock protein BMAL1 regulates IL-1β in macrophages via NRF2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2018) 115:E8460–e8468. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800431115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Jiang T, Tian F, Zheng H, Whitman SA, Lin Y, Zhang Z, et al. Nrf2 suppresses lupus nephritis through inhibition of oxidative injury and the NF-κB-mediated inflammatory response. Kidney Int. (2014) 85:333–43. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.343

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Udani S, Lazich I, Bakris GL. Epidemiology of hypertensive kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. (2011) 7:11–21. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2010.154

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Fedecostante M, Spannella F, Cola G, Espinosa E, Dessì-Fulgheri P, Sarzani R. Chronic kidney disease is characterized by "double trouble" higher pulse pressure plus night-time systolic blood pressure and more severe cardiac damage. PloS One. (2014) 9:e86155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086155

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Mojón A, Fernández JR. Sleep-time ambulatory BP is an independent prognostic marker of CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2017) 28:2802–11. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016111186

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Smolensky MH, Hermida RC, Castriotta RJ, Portaluppi F. Role of sleep-wake cycle on blood pressure circadian rhythms and hypertension. Sleep Med. (2007) 8:668–80. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2006.11.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Zhang J, Sun R, Jiang T, Yang G, Chen L. Circadian blood pressure rhythm in cardiovascular and renal health and disease. Biomolecules. (2021) 11:868. doi: 10.3390/biom11060868

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Smolensky MH, Hermida RC, Portaluppi F. Circadian mechanisms of 24-hour blood pressure regulation and patterning. Sleep Med Rev. (2017) 33:4–16. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2016.02.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Rodsutti J, Hensley M, Thakkinstian A, D'Este C, Attia J. A clinical decision rule to prioritize polysomnography in patients with suspected sleep apnea. Sleep. (2004) 27:694–9. doi: 10.1093/sleep/27.4.694

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Chen JC, Espeland MA, Brunner RL, Lovato LC, Wallace RB, Leng X, et al. Sleep duration, cognitive decline, and dementia risk in older women. Alzheimers Dement. (2016) 12:21–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.03.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Li Z, Xue J, Chen P, Chen L, Yan S, Liu L. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in mainland of China: a meta-analysis of published studies. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2014) 29:42–51. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12428

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: aging, chronic kidney disease, circadian syndrome, CHARLS, Chinese

Citation: Xiong Y, Zhong Q, Zhang Y, Liu Z and Wang X (2024) The association between circadian syndrome and chronic kidney disease in an aging population: a 4-year follow-up study. Front. Endocrinol. 15:1338110. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1338110

Received: 17 November 2023; Accepted: 21 March 2024;
Published: 26 April 2024.

Edited by:

Sanjeev Kumar Mahto, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), India

Reviewed by:

Jihwan Myung, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan
Ricardo Adrian Nugraha, Airlangga University, Indonesia

Copyright © 2024 Xiong, Zhong, Zhang, Liu and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhihong Liu, emhpaG9uZzAzMUAxMjYuY29t; Xianding Wang, eGlhbmRpbmd3YW5nQHNjdS5lZHUuY24=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.