Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Endocrinol., 01 November 2023
Sec. Renal Endocrinology
This article is part of the Research Topic Diabetic Renal Tubulointerstitial Disease View all 5 articles

Editorial: Diabetic renal tubulointerstitial disease

Katsumi Iizuka,*Katsumi Iizuka1,2*Kanako DeguchiKanako Deguchi1
  • 1Department of Clinical Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
  • 2Food and Nutrition Service Department, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Japan

Editorial on the Research Topic
Diabetic renal tubulointerstitial disease

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is one of the three microvascular complications of diabetes. DKD remains the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESRD) in many countries, and epidemiological studies suggest that approximately 40% of patients with diabetes will develop it (1). DKD involves classical diabetic nephropathy and tubulointerstitial inflammation and fibrosis. Progressive albuminuria was previously deemed the main factor in the development of diabetic nephropathy. However, it is now known that diabetic nephropathy can progress even without early trace albuminuria (2). The renal tubules and interstitium involve renal tubules (proximal, distal, and collecting), dendritic cells, macrophages, lymphocytes, lymphatic endothelial cells, renin or erythropoietin-producing cells, and fibroblasts, respectively. These suggest that renal tubule-interstitial regions are essential in regulating water-electrolytes, the immune system, and the endocrine system (3). Therefore, it is not hard to imagine that this inflammation and fibrosis in the tubulointerstitium can lead to reduced renal function and renal failure. The tubulointerstitial damage is correlated with the deterioration of renal function. In patients with diabetes, increased renal interstitial fibrosis directly correlates with reduced renal function, such as creatinine clearance (4). Moreover, recent studies have emphasized the crucial role of tubulointerstitial injury as a mediator of the progression of kidney disease (5, 6). As the topic of this editorial, we focused on diabetic renal tubulointerstitial disease.

Wang et al. reviewed the molecular mechanism of tubular injury in diabetic kidney disease. The authors state that several factors, such as hyperglycemia, lipid accumulation, oxidative stress, hypoxia, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), endoplasmic reticulum stress, inflammation, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and programmed cell death (including apoptosis, autophagy, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis), lead to renal tubular injury and exacerbate DKD (Wang et al.). Moreover, the authors summarized potential treatments against the progression of tubular damage. They described the role of drugs such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide 1Receptor Agonists (GLP-1RA), Renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors (RASi), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and stem cell therapies. In our daily clinical practice, we experienced a case of rapidly declining estimated glomerular filtration rate and tubular intestinal injury confirmed by renal biopsy, which was improved by the combination of SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, and RASi, and we realized the effectiveness of the drugs (7). Stem cells migrate to the injured sites and repair them through directional differentiation, paracrine effects, and modulation of the immune response (8). Stem cell-based cell therapy is expected to improve renal function effectively [Wang et al.]. It improves proteinuria, fibrosis, inflammation, apoptosis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and oxidative stress. However, it is unclear to what stage of disease this treatment should start. Perhaps it would be effective only when fibrosis is not sufficiently advanced. In the future, a marker to clinically quantify tubular damage and fibrosis and diagnose it early. Xu et al. also published the review Advances in Understanding and Treating Diabetic Kidney Disease: Focus on Tubulointerstitial Inflammation Mechanisms. The author’s review was focused on inflammatory mechanisms in the tubulointerstitium.

Luo et al. reported cellular senescence-associated signatures in diabetic kidney disease. The authors performed the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) algorithm to evaluate the activity of senescence pathways in DKD patients. Furthermore, the authors identified module genes related to cellular senescence pathways through the weighted gene coexpression network analysis algorithm. They constructed a cellular senescence-related signature (SRS) risk based on five hub genes (LIMA1 (LIM domain and actin binding 1), ZFP36 (ZFP36 ring finger protein), FOS (FOS proto-oncogene), IGFBP6 (insulin-like growth factor binding protein 6), and CKB (creatine kinase B)). The patients with the high SRS risk scores had lower GFR and higher expression of fibrotic genes than those with the low SRS risk scores. Moreover, the patients with high SRS risk scores exhibited extensive inhibition of mitochondrial functions (oxidative phosphorylation and fatty acid metabolism) and increased immune cell infiltration. The proximal tubules are essential for mitochondrial function because they require ATP during glucose and sodium reabsorption from urine (9). Furthermore, mitochondrial defects in renal proximal tubules contribute to increased oxidative stress and activation of inflammatory pathways, thereby causing progressive kidney function decline and fibrosis. Thus, proximal tubule changes strongly correlate with the glomerular filtration rate. These findings suggest the usefulness of the SRS risk score. These results reconfirmed the essential roles of cellular senescence in the progression of DKD. However, some questions remain. The paper does not mention the expression levels of LIMA1, ZFP36, FOS, IGFBP6, and CKB in the kidney, especially in the renal tubules. Explaining the role of the kidney concerning each molecule will benefit the readers. In addition, as risk assessment for gene expression requires kidney biopsy, quantitative surrogate marker criteria in blood or urine will be needed. We await further research in this regard.

There has been recently significant progress in genetic and epigenetic research. In this respect, not all papers dealt with renal tubulointerstitial injury. Some authors reported that the genotype of albuminuria in DKD appears to be different from that of eGFR (1). The proteinuria phenotype seems to cluster with genes expressed by podocytes (1). In contrast, the genotype of eGFR is very similar in those with and without diabetes (1). Associations have also been reported between hyperglycemia-induced DNA methylation and albuminuria, glycemic control, baseline eGFR, and eGFR decline (1). Moreover, genome-wide association and quantitative traits (GWAS, meQTL, and eQTL) revealed the critical roles of proximal tubules and metabolism in kidney function regulation (10). The study also showed the causal role of SLC47A1 in kidney disease. Thus, considering genetic factors, gene expression, and epigenetic factors may contribute to understanding the etiology of diabetic kidney disease in humans.

Author contributions

KI: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KD: Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Mohandas S, Doke T, Hu H, Mukhi D, Dhillon P, Susztak K. Molecular pathways that drive diabetic kidney disease. J Clin Invest (2023) 133(4):e165654. doi: 10.1172/JCI165654

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Tonolo G, Cherchi S. Tubulointerstitial disease in diabetic nephropathy. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis (2014) 7:107–15. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S37883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Zeisberg M, Kalluri R. Physiology of the renal interstitium. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2015) 10(10):1831–40. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00640114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Gilbert RE, Cooper ME. The tubulointerstitium in progressive diabetic kidney disease: More than an aftermath of glomerular injury? Kidney Int (1999) 56:1627–37. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00721.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Lim BJ, Yang JW, Zou J, Zhong J, Matsusaka T, Pastan I, et al. Tubulointerstitial fibrosis can sensitize the kidney to subsequent glomerular injury. Kidney Int (2017) 92(6):1395–403. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.04.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Zeni L, Norden AGW, Cancarini G, Unwin RJ. A more subtelocentric view of diabetic kidney disease. J Nephrol (2017) 30(6):701–17. doi: 10.1007/s40620-017-0423-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Nonomura K, Iizuka K, Kuwabara-Ohmura Y, Yabe D. SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 receptor agonist combination therapy substantially improved the renal function in a patient with type 2 diabetes: implications for additive renoprotective effects of the two drug classes. Intern Med (2020) 59(12):1535–9. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4323-19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Hoang DM, Pham PT, Bach TQ, Ngo ATL, Nguyen QT, Phan TTK, et al. Stem cell-based therapy for human diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther (2022) 7(1):272. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01134-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Yao L, Liang X, Qiao Y, Chen B, Wang P, Liu Z. Mitochondrial dysfunction in diabetic tubulopathy. Metabolism (2022) 131:155195. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2022.155195

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Liu H, Doke T, Guo D, Sheng X, Ma Z, Park J, et al. Epigenomic and transcriptomic analyses define core cell types, genes, and targetable mechanisms for kidney disease. Nat Genet (2022) 54(7):950–62. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01097-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: diabetic kidney disease, renal tubulointerstitial disease, diabetes mellitus, GWAS, cellular senescence

Citation: Iizuka K and Deguchi K (2023) Editorial: Diabetic renal tubulointerstitial disease. Front. Endocrinol. 14:1303514. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1303514

Received: 28 September 2023; Accepted: 09 October 2023;
Published: 01 November 2023.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Berthold Hocher, Heidelberg University, Germany

Copyright © 2023 Iizuka and Deguchi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Katsumi Iizuka, a2F0c3VtaS5paXp1a2FAZnVqaXRhLWh1LmFjLmpw

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.