data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Endocrinol. , 15 August 2023
Sec. Obesity
Volume 14 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1269546
This article is part of the Research Topic Endocrine and Metabolic Consequences of Childhood Obesity, Volume II View all 21 articles
This article is a correction to:
Sarcopenic Obesity in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review
A Corrigendum on
Sarcopenic obesity in children and adolescents: a systematic review
by Zembura M and Matusik P (2022) Front. Endocrinol. 13:914740. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.914740
In the published article, the reference 12 was incorrectly written as “NIH.Study Quality Assessment Tools. Available at: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools (Accessed 1.12.2021)”. The correct reference 12 should be “Woo J. Sarcopenia. Clin Geriatr Med (2017) 33(3), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2017.02.003.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
In the published article, there was an error in the first sentence of the section 3 Results, 3.1 Sarcopenic Obesity Evaluation Methods. This sentence previously stated:
“Overall DXA (n = 8/18) (33, 35, 37, 38, 41, 43, 44, 46) and analysis BIA (n = 6/18) (25, 34, 36, 42, 45, 48) were the most commonly used body composition evaluation methods, followed by other imaging techniques (4/18) (40, 46, 47, 49) and assessment of handgrip strength (HGS) using dynamometer (39).”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“Overall DXA (n = 8/18) (33, 35, 37, 38, 41, 43, 44, 46) and BIA (n = 6/18) (25, 34, 36, 42, 45, 48) were the most commonly used body composition evaluation methods, followed by other imaging techniques (4/18) (40, 46, 47, 49) and assessment of handgrip strength (HGS) using dynamometer (39).”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
In the published article, there was an error in the first sentence of the section 5 Conclusions.
This sentence previously stated:
“In conclusion, in our review, the prevalence of SO ranged from 984 5.66% to 69.7% in girls, with a range between 7.2% and 81.3% in 985 boys SO.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“In conclusion, in our review, the prevalence of SO ranged from 5.66% to 69.7% in girls, with a range between 7.2% and 81.3% in boys.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: sarcopenia, obesity, muscle mass, muscle strength, children, adolescents
Citation: Zembura M and Matusik P (2023) Corrigendum: Sarcopenic obesity in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Front. Endocrinol. 14:1269546. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1269546
Received: 30 July 2023; Accepted: 04 August 2023;
Published: 15 August 2023.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2023 Zembura and Matusik. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Marcela Zembura, bWFyY2VsYS56ZW1idXJhQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ==
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.