Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Endocrinol., 22 August 2023
Sec. Neuroendocrine Science
This article is part of the Research Topic Influence of Sleep and Recurrent Circadian Disruption on Cardiometabolic Health, Wellbeing, and Safety: From Shiftwork to Monday Mornings View all 8 articles

Editorial: Influence of sleep and recurrent circadian disruption on cardiometabolic health, wellbeing, and safety: from shiftwork to Monday mornings

  • 1Thomas Roth Sleep Disorders & Research Center, Henry Ford Health + Michigan State University Health Sciences, Detroit, MI, United States
  • 2Department of Sleep and Human Factors Research, Institute for Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center, Cologne, Germany
  • 3Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
  • 4Sleep, Chronobiology, and Health Laboratory, School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
  • 5Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States

The modern 24-hour society is contributing to insufficient sleep and a misalignment between behaviors and internal physiology, which have negative health consequences (1). A growing literature points to increased activity during the biological night (e.g., technology use and work hours) that disrupts sleep and circadian rhythms (2, 3). Despite strong evidence for the connection between recurrent sleep and circadian disruption and poor health, exact mechanisms driving these impairments remain unclear. Therefore, this Research Topic sought to highlight research on the mechanisms by which recurrent sleep and circadian disruption impair health and wellbeing.

In this editorial, we briefly summarize the publications within the Research Topic, which span the life course and provide insight regarding sleep/circadian disruption and health.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of on-duty death among US firefighters, with work hours that are characteristically long and that extend into nighttime hours (i.e., biological night). Current evidence suggests that dimensions of sleep (e.g., sleep quality and quantity), may reduce the risk of CVD death. Romero Cabrera et al. assessed whether sleep quality and quantity were associated with cardiometabolic risk among firefighters. They found that poor quality sleep and insufficient sleep (i.e., short sleep) increased cardiometabolic risk and a higher prevalence of hypertension and obesity.

Short-sleep, however, may not be the only factor resulting in poor health outcomes, particularly given the U-shaped relationship between sleep duration and health. Li et al. sought to examine if the U-shaped relationship is found in a meta-analysis of studies in populations of middle-aged and older adults. Incidence of depression was related to sleep duration in a U-shaped dose–response manner, with both shorter and longer sleeping durations conferring increased risk of depression compared to 7 hours of sleep. The findings from both studies reinforce the importance of sleep duration as a risk factor for health and depression.

Insufficient sleep duration is a hallmark problem in night shift workers. Over 20% of the US workforce work shift work hours, including sleep and circadian disrupting shifts (4). Chronic sleep restriction and recurrent circadian disruption (e.g., rotating shift work) can increase an individual’s risk of cardiovascular (5) and kidney disease (6), though mechanisms remain unclear. McMullan et al. utilized a 32-day in-laboratory protocol in which all behaviors (e.g., eating, activity, and sleep) were equally spread across all circadian phases, thereby desynchronizing the influence of sleep and circadian phase on physiological outcomes (i.e., “forced desynchrony”). Additionally, half of the participants were randomized to a sleep restriction condition, thereby allowing the examination of sleep restriction vs circadian disruption on cardiovascular and renal outcomes. They find that sleep restriction increases blood pressure and that renal outcomes differ depending on circadian timing versus behavioral influences; these results may provide mechanistic insights into contributing factors of CVD and renal impairments observed in shift work.

In addition to increased risk of CVD, shift workers also exhibit increased risk for poor glucose tolerance (7). While prior studies indicate that sleep restriction decreases insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance, precise mechanisms are unclear as sleep restriction is often accompanied with circadian disruption. Using a forced desynchrony protocol, Yuan et al. aimed to experimentally dissociate sleep restriction from circadian disruption and examine its contribution to glucose tolerance in healthy adults. They found that minimizing circadian disruption during sleep restriction may mitigate adverse outcomes in glucose tolerance, perhaps due to the preservation of slow wave sleep when circadian disruption was minimized. These findings further emphasize the importance of circadian rhythms to health.

Authors within this Research Topic also explored how sleep and circadian processes interact with hormone levels. Upon awakening, humans excrete a bolus of cortisol (8), referred to as the cortisol awakening response (CAR). Concurrently, cortisol also follows a robust circadian rhythm, peaking in the early morning hours (9). However, how the CAR is influenced by circadian timing is unknown. Using two forced desynchrony protocols, Bowles et al. measured the CAR as participants were awakened at differing circadian times. They report that the CAR follows a circadian rhythm, peaking in the morning and a nadir in the afternoon. These findings have implications for shift workers that awaken at differing circadian phases and for individuals that use cortisol as a diagnostic tool and thus need to consider circadian timing. Molzof et al. examined 24-hour rhythms in insulin and leptin levels among day and nightshift nurses. The authors found that nightshift nurses, compared to dayshift, had higher insulin and leptin levels across the 24-hour day. Moreover, nurses who consumed most of their calories during the nighttime on workdays exhibited higher 24-hour insulin and leptin levels compared to nurses who predominantly ate during the daytime. These findings suggest shiftwork and/or eating at night may increase risk for elevated insulin and leptin levels. Thus, eating during the daytime on workdays may reduce the negative effects of shiftwork on metabolism, but this should be further studied in a larger sample.

Last, previous studies have found that children’s body mass index (BMI) increases in the summer, but Moreno et al. sought to determine whether this increase is mediated by seasonal changes in height or weight. They found evidence of seasonality in children’s height but not weight gain; children gained height at a slightly faster rate during the school year compared to the summer, but the rate of weight gain did not differ across seasons. Comparing different BMI trajectories throughout elementary school, the authors suggest that seasonality in height may be associated with developing/maintaining a healthy weight status and that children who are at greatest risk of developing an unhealthy weight status would likely benefit from obesity prevention interventions during both the school year and summer.

The current Research Topic spans across a wide-range of professions, includes in-laboratory and fieldwork protocols, and identifies several important physiological outcomes that are all directly impacted by sleep and circadian disruption. These studies highlight how common events and behaviors, such as shift work, influence health and wellbeing. We believe that these important contributions to the field will inform intervention strategies including policy changes, behavioral interventions, and personalized medicine as the world experiences sleep and circadian disruption daily.

Author contributions

PC: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DF: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DJ: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AM: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the authors for submitting their excellent work to this Research Topic.

Conflict of interest

Author AM reports consulting fees for the company Pure Somni Corporation.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The authors declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Chaput J, McHill AW, Cox RC, Broussard JL, Dutil C, da Costa BGG, et al. The role of insufficient sleep and circadian misalignment in obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2023) 19:82–97. doi: 10.1038/s41574-022-00747-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Fuller C, Lehman E, Hicks S, Novick MB. Bedtime use of technology and associated sleep problems in children. Glob Pediatr Health (2017) 4:2333794x17736972. doi: 10.1177/2333794x17736972

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. James SM, Honn KA, Gaddameedhi S, Van Dongen HPA. Shift work: disrupted circadian rhythms and sleep-implications for health and well-being. Curr Sleep Med Rep (2017) 3:104–12. doi: 10.1007/s40675-017-0071-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. McMenamin TM. Time to work: recent trends in shift work and flexible schedules, A. Monthly Lab.Rev. (2007) 130:3.

Google Scholar

5. Vetter C, Devore EE, Wegrzyn LR, Massa J, Speizer FE, Kawachi I, et al. Association between rotating night shift work and risk of coronary heart disease among women. JAMA (2016) 315:1726–34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4454

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. McMullan CJ, Curhan GC, Forman JP. Association of short sleep duration and rapid decline in renal function. Kidney Int (2016) 89:1324–30. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2015.12.048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kroenke CH, Spiegelman D, Manson J, Schernhammer ES, Colditz GA, Kawachi I, et al. Work characteristics and incidence of type 2 diabetes in women. Am J Epidemiol (2007) 165:175–83. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj355

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Pruessner JC, Wolf OT, Hellhammer DH, Buske-Kirschbaum A, von Auer K, Jobst S, et al. Free cortisol levels after awakening: a reliable biological marker for the assessment of adrenocortical activity. Life Sci (1997) 61:2539–49. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(97)01008-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Czeisler CA, Klerman EB. Circadian and sleep-dependent regulation of hormone release in humans. Recent Prog Horm Res (1999) 54:97–130; discussion 130-132.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Keywords: circadian rhythm, circadian misalignment, jet lag, sleep disruption, sleep restriction

Citation: Cheng P, Fischer D, Johnson DA and McHill AW (2023) Editorial: Influence of sleep and recurrent circadian disruption on cardiometabolic health, wellbeing, and safety: from shiftwork to Monday mornings. Front. Endocrinol. 14:1268940. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1268940

Received: 28 July 2023; Accepted: 11 August 2023;
Published: 22 August 2023.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Hubert Vaudry, Université de Rouen, France

Copyright © 2023 Cheng, Fischer, Johnson and McHill. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Andrew W. McHill, bWNoaWxsQG9oc3UuZWR1

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.