Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol., 11 October 2023
Sec. Cardiovascular Endocrinology

Serum uric acid is related to liver and kidney disease and 12-year mortality risk after myocardial infarction

  • 1Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
  • 2Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • 3Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Objective: To study the associations of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and serum uric acid (SUA) in patients with post–myocardial infarction (MI) patients, and the relationship of SUA with 12-year mortality risk.

Methods: We included 3,396 patients (60–80 years old, 78% men) of the Alpha Omega Cohort. Multivariable prevalence ratios (PRs) were obtained for the association of NAFLD [fatty liver index (FLI), ≥77 (women) and ≥79 (men)] with CKD [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2]. We calculated sensitivity and specificity of SUA to detect the (combined) presence and absence of NAFLD and CKD. Cause-specific mortality was monitored from enrolment (2002–2006) through December 2018. Hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in SUA categories were obtained from multivariable Cox models.

Results: Median baseline FLI was 67 (men, 68; women, 64), and mean ± SD eGFR was 81 ± 20 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (17% with CKD). Sex-specific FLI was associated with higher CKD prevalence (PRtertile3 vs. tertile1, 1.94; 95% confidence interval: 1.57, 2.39). Baseline SUA was 0.36 ± 0.09 mmol/L. With increasing SUA concentrations, specificity for the presence of NAFLD, CKD, or both increased, and sensitivity decreased. During 12 (interquartile range, 9–14) years of follow-up, 1,592 patients died (713 from CVD). HRs ranged from 1.08 (0.88, 1.32) for SUA ≤0.25 mmol/L to 2.13 (1.75, 2.60) for SUA >0.50 mmol/L vs. SUA >0.30–0.35 mmol/L for all-cause mortality. For CVD mortality, HRs ranged from 1.05 (0.77, 1.44) to 2.43 (1.83, 3.25).

Conclusions: NAFLD and CKD were strongly associated, which was reflected by higher SUA concentrations. SUA was a strong predictor of 12-year mortality risk after MI.

1 Introduction

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide and is regarded as the hepatic manifestation of metabolic dysregulation (13). NAFLD is a condition with a wide spectrum of severity, ranging from simple steatosis to steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and cirrhosis. The Fatty Liver Index (FLI) (4) is a scoring system and an easy tool to predict NAFLD in large observational studies. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has also emerged as a public health issue in the past decades and is a major cause of death (5). Cross-sectional studies link NAFLD, as assessed by the FLI, and CKD in population-based studies (6, 7) and in patients with diabetes (8), which often co-exist with other cardiometabolic alterations, such as insulin resistance, obesity, and elevated blood pressure (1, 9). However, little is known about this association in patients with established cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).

Both NAFLD and CKD have been associated with elevated serum uric acid (SUA) concentrations (10, 11). Studies in healthy populations have demonstrated the prognostic value of SUA for incidence of NAFLD or CKD (1215). Because previous studies have shown strong associations between NAFLD and CKD (68), SUA might also be a marker for the combined presence of both diseases, reflecting an advanced stage of cardiometabolic disorders. SUA was previously associated with a 1.60-fold higher mortality risk in a study of 10,840 Italian patients with post–myocardial infarction (MI) (16). However, little is known about SUA, as potential marker of NAFLD and CKD (combined), in relation to (CVD) mortality after MI.

In Dutch patients with post-MI of the Alpha Omega Cohort, we studied the association between NAFLD and CKD. We then evaluated the diagnostic performance of SUA to detect the (combined) presence and absence of NAFLD and CKD. Finally, we examined whether SUA as diagnostic marker of NAFLD and CKD is associated with long-term mortality risk.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study design and study population

We used data of the Alpha Omega Cohort, consisting of 4,837 drug-treated Dutch patients (aged 60–80 years, 78% men) with a verified history of MI ≤10 years prior to study enrolment. Venous blood samples and data on lifestyle, diet, health, medication use, and anthropometrics were collected at baseline (17, 18). Patients have been continuously monitored for cause-specific mortality. The study was approved by the medical ethics committee of the Haga Hospital (The Hague, The Netherlands). All patients provided verbal and written informed consent for long-term follow-up.

The current analysis excluded patients with missing baseline data on FLI components (n = 207), on alcohol consumption (n = 427), and on eGFR (n = 117). We further excluded patients with heavy alcohol intake (defined as >30 g/day for men and >20 g/day for women, n = 628) and allopurinol users (n = 62), yielding 3,396 patients for all analyses (Supplemental Figure 1).

2.2 FLI

Baseline FLI was calculated using body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2), waist circumference (cm), gamma glutamyl-transferase (GGT, in U/L), and triglycerides (mg/dL). The score is validated in a Caucasian population-based cohort and is calculated as follows (19):

FLI = (e0.953*loge (triglycerides) + 0.139*BMI + 0.718*loge (ggt) + 0.053*waist circumference  15.745) / (1+e0.953*loge (triglycerides) + 0.139*BMI + 0.718*loge (ggt) + 0.053*waist circumference  15.745)×100

FLI was categorized into sex-specific tertiles (T1, <49; T2, ≥49–<77; and T3, ≥77 for women; T1, <56; T2, ≥56–<79; and T3, ≥79 for men), and T3 was used as indicator of NAFLD. Weight and height were measured at the patients’ home or hospital by trained research nurses, and BMI was calculated. Waist circumference (cm) was measured at the midpoint between the bottom rib and the top of the hipbone using a non-elastic tape.

Venous blood samples (30 mL) were drawn fasted (≥8 h, 35% of the analytical sample) or non-fasted and were sent to the laboratory by next-working-day mail service at ambient temperatures. Blood samples were immediately processed and stored at −80°C upon arrival (20). Serum triglycerides were determined in multiple batches by standard assays (Roche Diagnostics, cat. no. 1488872) on an automated analyzer (Hitachi 912, Roche Diagnostics) with an inter- and intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) <10%. Serum GGT was determined in one batch after completion of the cohort by standard assays (Abbott Diagnostics, cat. no. 7D6522) on an automated analyzer (ARCHITECT ci8200, Abbott) with an intra- and inter-assay CV <10%.

2.3 eGFR and SUA

A particle-enhanced immunonephelometric assay was used to measure serum cystatin C, and the modified kinetic Jaffé method was used to measure serum creatinine as described in detail elsewhere (21). We used the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation from 2021 to estimate GFR, which includes both serum creatinine and serum cystatin C (22). CKD was defined as eGFR <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 at baseline. SUA was determined from the same venous blood samples using standard assays (Roche Diagnostics, cat. no. 03P3922) on an automated analyzer (ARCHITECT ci8200, Abbott). Intra- and inter-assay CV was <10%.

2.4 Mortality endpoints

Endpoints for the analysis of SUA with mortality risk were all-cause mortality and CVD mortality. Patients were monitored for their vital status from baseline until 31 December 2018 through linkage with municipal registries. Data collection on cause-specific mortality occurred in three phases. During the first 40 months of follow-up (2002–2009), information was obtained from the national mortality registries (Statistics Netherlands, CBS), treating physicians, and close family members. Primary and contributing causes of death were coded by an independent Endpoint Adjudication Committee and described in detail elsewhere (17, 18). After 40 months of follow-up through 2012, mortality data were obtained from CBS for primary and contributing causes of death. From 2013 onward, data on only primary cause of death were obtained from CBS. Treating physicians filled out an additional cause-of-death questionnaire (response rate, 67%), which was coded by study physicians who were not involved in the current analysis. The endpoint CVD or CHD was allocated to all patients for whom it was a primary or contributing cause of death, based on any of the data sources. Fatal endpoints were coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) (23). CVD mortality comprised CHD (codes I20–I25), cardiac arrest (I46), heart failure (I50), stroke (I60–I69), and undefined sudden death (R96). CHD mortality comprised I20–I25, I46, and R96.

2.5 Other measurements

At baseline, data on sociodemographic factors and lifestyle habits were collected through self-administered questionnaires as described in detail elsewhere (17). Smoking status was categorized into four categories (current; former, ≤10 years; former, >10 years; and never). Alcohol consumption was assessed with a 203-item validated food frequency questionnaire (24), and ethanol intake (g/day) was computed. Alcohol consumption was then categorized as abstainers (0 g/day), light (>0–10 g/day for men and >0–5 g/day for women), and moderate consumption (>10–30 g/day for men and >5–20 g/day for women). The 2015 Dutch Healthy Diet index (DHD15-index) score was calculated to reflect adherence to the dietary guidelines [scale from no adherence (0) to maximal adherence (150)] (25). Liver enzymes (U/L), alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, were determined by standard assays (Abbott Diagnostics, cat. nos. 8L9222 and 8L9122) on an automated analyzer (ARCHITECT ci8200, Abbott) with an inter- and intra-assay CV <10% from stored blood samples. Blood lipids [mmol/L; total serum cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c)] and plasma glucose (mmol/L) were analyzed using standard kits (Hitachi 912, Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). The Friedewald formula was used to calculate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) (26). Patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 were classified as having obesity. Diabetes mellitus was considered present in case of a self-reported physician’s diagnosis, use of glucose-lowering medication, or elevated plasma glucose (≥7.0 mmol/L if fasted >4 h or ≥11.0 mmol/L if not fasted). Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured twice on the left arm with the patient in a seated position, using an automated device (Omron HEM-711) following a 10-min rest. The values were then averaged. Self-reported medication use was checked by trained research nurses and coded according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System (27): statins (C10AA), antihypertensive drugs (C02, C03, C07, C08, and C09), glucose-lowering drugs (A10), renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers (C09), and diuretics [C03, including thiazides (C03A) and high-ceiling diuretics (C03C)].

2.6 Statistical analysis

We visually checked the distribution of the data by using histograms. Baseline characteristics are presented across sex-specific FLI tertiles. Normally distributed variables are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). Medians and interquartile range (IQR) are used for skewed data, and n (%) is used for categorical data.

We used Cox proportional hazard regression models with follow-up time equal to 1 and robust variances [prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)] to analyze the association between FLI in sex-specific tertiles (T1 as reference) and prevalent CKD.

PRs in the first model were adjusted for age, sex, and fasting state (<8 h, ≥8 h). Model 2 additionally included smoking status (never, former quit ≤10 years ago, former quit >10 years ago, and current), alcohol consumption (abstainers, light, and moderate), statin use (yes or no), and time since last MI. To test the robustness of the results, we repeated analyses subsequently excluding patients with obesity or diabetes. The Ptrend was obtained by analysing sex-specific FLI tertiles as continuous variable. We also analyzed the association of FLI as a continuous variable with prevalent CKD using restricted cubic splines (RCSs) in men and women separately. Three knots at the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles were used according to Akaike’s information criteria, using the median of T1 (30 for women and 41 for men) as the reference. The Wald chi-square test was used to test for non-linearity.

We analyzed the relationship of FLI and eGFR with SUA (all as continuous variables) with RCS and visualized these in three-dimensional plots. We used model 2 of the previously mentioned FLI-CKD analysis, and we additionally added diuretics use (yes or no) and total serum cholesterol. Furthermore, multivariable linear regression models were used to examine the associations of sex-specific FLI tertiles (T1 as reference) and of prevalent CKD (no CKD as reference) with SUA. We used model 2 also including diuretics use (yes or no) and total serum cholesterol and additionally adjusted analyses of FLI for eGFR and vice versa. Analyses were repeated after excluding patients with obesity or diabetes, and thiazides and high-ceiling diuretics use, as these may affect SUA concentrations (28).

We calculated the proportion of patients with the combined absence of NAFLD and CKD, the presence of NAFLD, the presence of CKD, and the combined presence of NAFLD and CKD per interval of 0.05 mmol/L SUA across the range of the 10th to 90th percentile of SUA (0.25–0.50 mmol/L). Sensitivity and specificity analyses were used to assess the diagnostic utility of SUA to detect the four combinations of the (combined) presence and absence of NAFLD and CKD. In prospective analyses, we then used Cox proportional hazard regression models [hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs] to examine the association between SUA and (CVD) mortality risk. SUA was analyzed in intervals of 0.05 mmol/L across the range of the 10th to 90th percentile (0.25–0.50 mmol/L), and we used >0.30–0.35 mmol/L as the reference. Proportional hazard assumptions were examined by log-minus-log survival plots and were met. Survival time was defined as the period between date of baseline assessment and date of death or end of follow-up (for participants who survived), whichever came first. Patients who died due to a competing risk were censored, in addition to those who were lost to follow-up and survived until the end of follow-up. One patient was lost to follow-up and censored after 2.9 years. Models were adjusted for the same variables as in the analyses of FLI, eGFR, and SUA. Analyses were repeated after excluding 748 women, 803 obese patients, 696 patients with diabetes, 805 diuretics users, 1,698 patients with DHD15-index score <80 (below median-split), or 544 current smokers. We also analyzed the association between SUA as continuous variable and (CVD) mortality, using RCS with three knots (10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles) and the median of the group >0.30–0.35 mmol/L as the reference (0.33 mmol/L).

Missing data on fasting state (n = 61) and time since last MI (n = 7) were imputed using multiple imputation with chained equations (with 10 imputations and 10 iterations) using the MICE package (29). The analyses were performed in each imputed dataset separately, and the estimates were subsequently pooled using Rubin’s rules (30).

We used RStudio version 3.6.0 for all analyses, and a two-sided p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3 Results

3.1 Baseline characteristics

The patient characteristics across sex-specific FLI tertiles at baseline are presented in Table 1. Patients were 69 ± 6 years old and predominantly men (78%). Patients in FLI T3 had a lower eGFR and had higher SUA concentrations than patients in FLI T1. Furthermore, 61% of the patients in FLI T3 were obese, 31% had diabetes, and 97% had hypertension.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 3,396 patients with post-MI of the Alpha Omega Cohort across sex-specific FLI tertiles.

3.2 Association between FLI and CKD

At baseline, median (IQR) FLI was 67 (48–83), and mean ± SD eGFR was 81 ± 20 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (17% with CKD). In T3 of FLI, 21% had CKD, whereas this was 13% in T1 of FLI. After multivariable adjustment, FLI was associated with higher CKD prevalence, with a PR (95% CI) of 1.94 (1.57, 2.39) for patients in T3 vs. T1 (Table 2). This association was confirmed in RCS in strata of men and women (Figure 1) and remained strong and statistically significant after excluding patients with obesity or diabetes (Supplemental Table 1).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Associations of sex-specific FLI tertiles with prevalent CKD in 3,396 patients with post-MI of the Alpha Omega Cohort.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Associations of FLI as continuous variable with prevalent CKD among female (n = 748, A) and male (n=2,648, B) patients with post-MI of the Alpha Omega Cohort. Solid lines represent PRs, and dashed lines represent 95% CIs. The histogram represents the distribution of FLI. Three-knot restricted cubic splines were used, with the median of T1 (FLI of 30 for women and 41 for men) as reference point. PRs were adjusted for age, fasting state (<8 h, ≥8 h), smoking status (never, former quit ≤10 years ago, former quit >10 years ago, and current), alcohol consumption (abstainers, light, and moderate), time since last MI, and statin use (yes or no). Prevalent CKD defined as eGFR <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2. CKD, chronic kidney disease; PR, prevalence ratio; CI, confidence interval; FLI, fatty liver index; MI, myocardial infarction.

3.3 Association between FLI, eGFR, and SUA

At baseline, the mean ± SD SUA concentration was 0.36 ± 0.09 mmol/L. Patients in T3 of FLI had on average 0.041 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.035, 0.048) higher SUA concentrations than patients in T1, and patients with CKD had on average 0.073 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.065, 0.080) higher SUA concentrations than patients without CKD (Supplemental Table 2). Results remained similar after excluding patients with obesity or diabetes (Supplemental Table 2). After exclusion of patients using thiazides or high-ceiling diuretics, differences in SUA concentrations were slightly larger, especially for CKD. When FLI, eGFR, and SUA were analyzed as continuous variables in RCS, we observed that patients with the highest FLI and lowest eGFR had the highest SUA concentration, after multivariable adjustment (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Associations of FLI and eGFR as continuous variables with SUA, overall, and among female (n = 748) and male (n = 2,648) patients with post-MI of the Alpha Omega Cohort. Three-knot restricted cubic splines were used. Values were adjusted for age, sex (except when stratified), fasting state (<8 h, ≥8 h), smoking status (never, former quit ≤10 years ago, former quit >10 years ago, and current), alcohol consumption (abstainers, light, and moderate), time since last MI, statin use (yes or no), total serum cholesterol, and diuretics use (yes or no). FLI, fatty liver index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; MI, myocardial infarction; SUA, serum uric acid.

3.4 Association of SUA as diagnostic marker of NAFLD and CKD with mortality

In Figure 3, the proportions of patients with the four combinations of (combined) presence and absence of NAFLD and CKD are presented over the range of SUA concentrations. With higher SUA concentrations, proportions of patients with either NAFLD, CKD or both conditions increased, with the latter group being the largest at SUA concentrations >0.50 mmol/L [35% vs. 23% (NAFLD), 28% (CKD), and 14% (none)]. With higher SUA concentrations, the specificity for NAFLD, CKD, or both increased, and the sensitivity decreased. The highest specificity and lowest sensitivity of SUA to detect NAFLD, CKD, or both conditions were reached at SUA concentrations >0.50 mmol/L.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Associations of SUA in relation to all-cause mortality (A) and CVD mortality risk (B), proportion of the (combined) absence and presence of NAFLD and CKD, and sensitivity and specificity across categories of SUA in 3,396 patients with post-MI of the Alpha Omega Cohort. HRs were adjusted for age, sex, fasting state, smoking status, alcohol consumption, time since last MI, statin use, total serum cholesterol, and diuretics use. NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; SUA, serum uric acid; CVD, cardiovascular disease.

During a median (IQR) follow-up of 12.4 (8.6–13.8) years, 1,592 patients died (713 from CVD). After multivariable adjustment, SUA concentrations ≤0.30 mmol/L were not associated with (CVD) mortality risk (Figure 3; Supplemental Table 3). However, SUA concentrations >0.35 mmol/L were associated with higher all-cause mortality risk as compared with SUA concentrations >0.30–0.35 mmol/L, with HRs (95% CIs) ranging from 1.18 (1.01, 1.37) for SUA >0.35–0.40 mmol/L through 2.13 (1.75, 2.60) for SUA >0.50 mmol/L. Similarly for CVD mortality, we observed the largest risk estimate for SUA concentrations >0.50 mmol/L [HR 2.43 (95% CI: 1.83, 3.25)] (Figure 3; Supplemental Table 3). Associations for (CVD) mortality were supported by RCS in which SUA was analyzed as continuous variable (Supplemental Figure 2). Results remained largely similar in sensitivity analyses, such as after exclusion of women and patient with obesity or diabetes (Supplemental Table 4).

4 Discussion

Our findings showed a strong cross-sectional association between NAFLD, as assessed by FLI, and CKD in drug-treated patients with post-MI. Furthermore, FLI and CKD were positively associated with SUA concentrations at baseline. Finally, SUA, as marker of NAFLD and CKD, was associated with a more than two-fold higher (CVD) mortality risk.

To our knowledge, data on the association between FLI and CKD in patients with post-MI are lacking. In a population-based study of 9,436 Chinese adults, higher FLI was associated with higher odds of prevalent CKD, in line with our findings (7). A meta-analysis of cross-sectional population-based studies showed that NAFLD, diagnosed by either ultrasound, histology, or biochemistry, was associated with a two-fold higher odds of prevalent CKD (4). In addition, in our study among patients with post-MI, we found that men and women in the highest vs. lowest tertile of FLI had almost two-fold higher CKD prevalence.

Previous population-based studies have examined the cross-sectional relationship of NAFLD or CKD with SUA but not of both conditions simultaneously. In 5,370 healthy men and women aged 20–74 years of the Third National Health and Nutrition and Examination Survey, participants with hyperuricemia were 40% more likely to have NAFLD (assessed by ultrasound), compared with participants without hyperuricemia (11). Previous Mendelian randomization (MR) studies, using genetic variants to examine causal effects, found no evidence of SUA being a causal risk factor for NAFLD (31, 32). On the contrary, SUA was elevated upon the consequence of NAFLD (31). SUA was positively associated with CKD prevalence in 5,808 elderly of the Cardiovascular Health Study (10). A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of patients with CKD showed that SUA-lowering therapy might mitigate the worsening of kidney function (33). However, included trials had a small sample size, there was substantial heterogeneity among trials, and only three of the 12 included studies were double-blinded and placebo-controlled. Therefore, it remains unclear whether SUA plays a causal role in the development of CKD. Nevertheless, SUA, in addition with other markers, has been shown to be a predictor for NAFLD and CKD. Further research is warranted as to whether the addition of SUA might improve the risk assessment of NAFLD and CKD combined.

Previous studies in healthy populations found that prevalent CKD (10) and NAFLD (assessed by ultrasonography) (11) were associated with elevated SUA concentrations. With increasing SUA concentrations, we found larger proportions of patients with either NAFLD, CKD, or both conditions, and this was translated into a higher mortality risk. We observed a more than two-fold higher risk of (CVD) mortality for patients with SUA concentrations >0.50 mmol/L, with patients having both NAFLD and CKD being the largest group. In the GISSI-Prevenzione Trial of 10,840 patients with post-MI and 3.5 years follow-up, patients with SUA concentrations >0.38 vs. <0.25 mmol/L had a 1.60-fold and 1.40-fold higher risk of all-cause and CVD mortality, respectively (16). More than 85% of patients in the Alpha Omega Cohort were treated according to current therapeutic strategies, whereas this was <50% in the GISSI-Prevenzione Trial. Untreated cardiovascular risk factors (i.e., blood pressure) in patients with post-MI may dilute the association of SUA with mortality, which could explain the differences in mortality risk between the Alpha Omega Cohort and GISSI-Prevenzione Trial. However, it remains controversial whether SUA is causal risk factor for CVD. Urate-lowering intervention studies and MR studies failed to show SUA being causally related to CVD events and intermediate risk factors, such as inflammation (34). Therefore, elevated SUA concentrations might merely be a reflection of metabolic dysregulation, such as the presence NAFLD and CKD as shown in the current study.

Strengths of the current study include the large cohort of stable patients with post-MI with detailed data on potential confounders. Limitations include the use of a proxy measure (4) as indicator of NAFLD, whereas imaging techniques are preferred. However, FLI is a validated marker, based on ultrasonography (16), to predict NAFLD and is easier to implement in epidemiological cohort studies. Approximately one-third of our cohort provided fasting blood samples. Non-fasting samples may yield higher serum triglyceride and GGT concentrations. However, results did not change after adjustment for fasting state. Third, kidney function was not measured but estimated. However, eGFR has been widely accepted and used as a valid measure of kidney function in clinical practice (22). Furthermore, using one measurement of SUA may not be reliable. However, within the patients with a repeated measurement of SUA after 40 months of follow-up, the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between two measurements of SUA was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.73), indicating a good stability. Finally, because of the observational design of the current study, we cannot prove a causal relationship between NAFLD and CKD or that SUA is causal risk factor of mortality.

To conclude, our results show that NAFLD and CKD are strongly related in patients with post-MI. The strong interrelationship between NAFLD and CKD is, in turn, reflected by elevated SUA concentrations and associated with higher mortality risks. SUA can act as an additional biomarker to improve risk prediction for patients with post-MI, as previously shown in the GISSI-Prevenzione Trial (16). As higher SUA concentration has been associated with multiple cardiometabolic diseases, a diagnostic model based on a single biomarker for NAFLD and CKD is likely unreliable. Therefore, further research is warranted as to whether SUA, with the addition of standard risk markers, can provide a more time- and cost-efficient risk assessment for NAFLD and CKD combined in patients with post-MI.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors upon reasonable request.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the medical ethics committee of the Haga Hospital (The Hague, the Netherlands). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

LH, AW, TV, and JMG designed the study; LH and AW analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript; LH, AW, IK, EB, TV, and JMG interpreted the results and revised the manuscript; all authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

LH and ACvW have both received a grant from Jaap Schouten Foundation (JSF_SU_10_2018). TV reports grants from Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Delft University, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, National Dairy Association, and European Union. JMG reports grants from the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports in The Netherlands, and the European Union. Data collection for the Alpha Omega Cohort was funded by the Dutch Heart Foundation (grant no. 200T401) and the National Institutes of Health (USA, NIH/NHLBI grant no. R01HL076200).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1240099/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, Anstee QM, Targher G, Romero-Gomez M, et al. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement. J Hepatol (2020) 73(1):202–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ge X, Zheng L, Wang M, Du Y, Jiang J. Prevalence trends in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease at the global, regional and national levels, 1990-2017: a population-based observational study. BMJ Open (2020) 10(8):e036663. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036663

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Mendez-Sanchez N, Bugianesi E, Gish RG, Lammert F, Tilg H, Nguyen MH, et al. Global multi-stakeholder endorsement of the MAFLD definition. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol (2022) 7(5):388–90. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00062-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Musso G, Gambino R, Tabibian JH, Ekstedt M, Kechagias S, Hamaguchi M, et al. Association of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS Med (2014) 11(7):e1001680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001680

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. GBD Chronic Kidney Disease Collaboration. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet (2020) 395(10225):709–33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32977-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Nabi O, Boursier J, Lacombe K, Mathurin P, de Ledinghen V, Goldberg M, et al. Comorbidities are associated with fibrosis in NAFLD subjects: a nationwide study (NASH-CO Study). Dig Dis Sci (2022) 67(6):2584–93. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07032-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Sun K, Lin D, Li F, Qi Y, Feng W, Yan L, et al. Fatty liver index, albuminuria and the association with chronic kidney disease: a population-based study in China. BMJ Open (2018) 8(1):e019097. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019097

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Ciardullo S, Muraca E, Perra S, Bianconi E, Zerbini F, Oltolini A, et al. Screening for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in type 2 diabetes using non-invasive scores and association with diabetic complications. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care (2020) 8(1):e000904. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000904

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Byrne CD, Targher G. NAFLD as a driver of chronic kidney disease. J Hepatol (2020) 72(4):785–801. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.01.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Chonchol M, Shlipak MG, Katz R, Sarnak MJ, Newman AB, Siscovick DS, et al. Relationship of uric acid with progression of kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis (2007) 50(2):239–47. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.05.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Shih MH, Lazo M, Liu SH, Bonekamp S, Hernaez R, Clark JM. Association between serum uric acid and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the US population. J Formos Med Assoc (2015) 114(4):314–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.11.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Chien KL, Lin HJ, Lee BC, Hsu HC, Lee YT, Chen MF. A prediction model for the risk of incident chronic kidney disease. Am J Med (2010) 123(9):836–46 e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.05.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Wang J, Tang Y, Peng K, Liu H, Xu J. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the non-obese Chinese population. Am J Transl Res (2020) 12(10):6149–59. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-24981/v1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Wei F, Li J, Chen C, Zhang K, Cao L, Wang X, et al. Higher serum uric acid level predicts non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A 4-year prospective cohort study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2020) 11:179. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00179

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Zhang Y, Shi R, Yu L, Ji L, Li M, Hu F. Establishment of a risk prediction model for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Ther (2020) 11(9):2057–73. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00893-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Levantesi G, Marfisi RM, Franzosi MG, Maggioni AP, Nicolosi GL, Schweiger C, et al. Uric acid: a cardiovascular risk factor in patients with recent myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol (2013) 167(1):262–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.12.110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Geleijnse JM, Giltay EJ, Schouten EG, de Goede J, Oude Griep LM, Teitsma-Jansen AM, et al. Effect of low doses of n-3 fatty acids on cardiovascular diseases in 4,837 post-myocardial infarction patients: design and baseline characteristics of the Alpha Omega Trial. Am Heart J (2010) 159(4):539–46 e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Kromhout D, Giltay EJ, Geleijnse JM, Alpha Omega Trial G. n-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med (2010) 363(21):2015–26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003603

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Bedogni G, Bellentani S, Miglioli L, Masutti F, Passalacqua M, Castiglione A, et al. The fatty liver index: a simple and accurate predictor of hepatic steatosis in the general population. BMC Gastroenterol (2006) 6:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-6-33

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Giltay EJ, Geleijnse JM, Schouten EG, Katan MB, Kromhout D. High stability of markers of cardiovascular risk in blood samples. Clin Chem (2003) 49(4):652–5. doi: 10.1373/49.4.652

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Hoogeveen EK, Geleijnse JM, Giltay EJ, Soedamah-Muthu SS, de Goede J, Oude Griep LM, et al. Kidney function and specific mortality in 60-80 years old post-myocardial infarction patients: A 10-year follow-up study. PloS One (2017) 12(2):e0171868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171868

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Inker LA, Eneanya ND, Coresh J, Tighiouart H, Wang D, Sang Y, et al. New creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations to estimate GFR without race. N Engl J Med (2021) 385(19):1737–49. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102953

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Fifth edition. Geneva: World Health Organization (2015).

Google Scholar

24. Feunekes GI, Van Staveren WA, De Vries JH, Burema J, Hautvast JG. Relative and biomarker-based validity of a food-frequency questionnaire estimating intake of fats and cholesterol. Am J Clin Nutr (1993) 58(4):489–96. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/58.4.489

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Looman M, Feskens EJ, de Rijk M, Meijboom S, Biesbroek S, Temme EH, et al. Development and evaluation of the Dutch Healthy Diet index 2015. Public Health Nutr (2017) 20(13):2289–99. doi: 10.1017/S136898001700091X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem (1972) 18(6):499–502. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/18.6.499

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. World Health Organization. Anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system (ATC). Oslo, Norway: WHO (2009).

Google Scholar

28. Ben Salem C, Slim R, Fathallah N, Hmouda H. Drug-induced hyperuricaemia and gout. Rheumatology (2016) 56(5):679–88. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew293

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Software (2011) 45(3):1–68. doi: 10.18637/jss.v045.i03

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons (2004).

Google Scholar

31. Li S, Fu Y, Liu Y, Zhang X, Li H, Tian L, et al. Serum uric acid levels and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a 2-sample bidirectional Mendelian Randomization study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2022) 107(8):e3497–e503. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac190

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Tang Y, Xu Y, Liu P, Liu C, Zhong R, Yu X, et al. No evidence for a causal link between serum uric acid and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease from the dongfeng-tongji cohort study. Oxid Med Cell Longev (2022) 2022:6687626. doi: 10.1155/2022/6687626

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Liu X, Zhai T, Ma R, Luo C, Wang H, Liu L. Effects of uric acid-lowering therapy on the progression of chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ren Fail (2018) 40(1):289–97. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2018.1456463

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Saito Y, Tanaka A, Node K, Kobayashi Y. Uric acid and cardiovascular disease: a clinical review. J Cardiol (2021) 78(1):51–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.12.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, kidney diseases, glomerular filtration rate, uric acid, mortality

Citation: Heerkens L, van Westing AC, Voortman T, Kardys I, Boersma E and Geleijnse JM (2023) Serum uric acid is related to liver and kidney disease and 12-year mortality risk after myocardial infarction. Front. Endocrinol. 14:1240099. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1240099

Received: 14 June 2023; Accepted: 18 September 2023;
Published: 11 October 2023.

Edited by:

Jelena Vekic, University of Belgrade, Serbia

Reviewed by:

Emir Muzurovic, Clinical Center of Montenegro, Montenegro
Tianshu Zeng, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China
Milica Miljkovic Trailovic, University of Belgrade, Serbia

Copyright © 2023 Heerkens, van Westing, Voortman, Kardys, Boersma and Geleijnse. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Luc Heerkens, bHVjLmhlZXJrZW5zQHd1ci5ubA==

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.