Melissa A. Burmeister
Tara E. Smith2
Abby J. Weldon- 1William Carey University School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Biloxi, MS, United States
- 2William Carey University Department of Pharmacy Practice, Biloxi, MS, United States
Obesity adversely impacts millions of American adults by predisposing them to significant health risks and further complications. Obesity is differentiated into two groups: metabolically healthy and metabolically unhealthy. In contrast to metabolically healthy counterparts, obese individuals who are metabolically unhealthy display hallmark symptoms of metabolic syndrome (e.g., hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, abdominal obesity). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) commonly occurs in all obese populations, as do poor dietary habits. Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), due to their wide availability, are most often used to treat GERD-related heartburn and other symptoms. Here, we review the evidence on how poor diet as well as short- and long-term use of PPIs adversely affect the gastrointestinal microbiota to cause dysbiosis. Key components of dysbiosis-induced metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO) associated with PPI use include “leaky gut,” systemic low-grade inflammation, and reduced amounts of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) such as butyrate that promote metabolic health. The benefit of using probiotics to mitigate PPI-induced dysbiosis and MUO is also discussed.
Introduction
Obesity is a chronic, progressive disease with significant adverse health effects and is clinically defined by a body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2 (1). According to the 2022 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the obesity rate in American adults is 42% (2). Obesity is a significant risk factor for a myriad of comorbidities including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, gastrointestinal (GI) tract diseases, kidney damage, liver dysfunction, mental illness, and several cancers. Obesity imparts a significant healthcare burden. Healthcare costs are estimated at $172 billion, with heightened costs in severely obese individuals (BMI >35) that increase with age (3).
While most obese individuals exhibit one or more additional metabolic complications, some lack any overt sign of coinciding disease. To differentiate between these two conditions, the medical community coined the terms metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO) and metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) (4, 5). Obesity is oftentimes accompanied by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), prompting the use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), among other medications, to manage acid reflux and related symptoms (6–8). Mounting evidence indicate that several oral medications including antibiotics and PPIs unfavorably alter the gut microbiota; the resultant dysbiosis is implicated in the etiology and pathogenesis of obesity. Many findings about diet composition, obesity, and PPI use come from preclinical research in animals. Here, we explore the relationships between poor diet, GERD, PPI use, metabolic disease, immune dysfunction, and dysbiosis as well as their associative and potentially causal roles in MUO.
Metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) vs. metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO)
MHO is clinical obesity without any comorbidities associated with metabolic syndrome. MHO is characterized by preserved insulin sensitivity, reduced systemic inflammation, less visceral fat, and more favorable hepatic function than MUO counterparts (5, 9). The following MHO criteria are proposed: fasting triglycerides ≤150 mg/dL; high density lipoprotein serum concentration >40 mg/dL in men or >50 mg/dL in women; systolic blood pressure <130 mmHg; diastolic blood pressure <85 mmHg; and fasting blood glucose <100 mg/dL (4, 10). Since MHO individuals have no cardiometabolic disorder, medications for dyslipidemia, hypertension, or diabetes are not required (4, 10). Lack of concrete MHO criteria has led to a large degree of heterogeneity amongst research participants, generating debate about whether to classify MHO as a distinct phenotype or place it on a spectrum that incorporates a devolution to MUO (4, 5). Factors promoting MHO status include healthy diet; regular physical activity; genetic predisposition towards more subcutaneous (vs. visceral) fat; and gut microbiome diversity (5, 10). Metabolic heterogeneity amongst obese individuals is partly governed by differences in adipose tissue physiology, whereby genetic determinants of body fat distribution, depot-specific fat metabolism, adipose tissue plasticity, and adipogenesis predispose some individuals to adiposopathy and MUO (5). Adverse changes in body weight, body composition (i.e., lean vs. fat mass), metabolism (i.e., food intake, energy expenditure (EE), glucose clearance, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion), and fecal microbiota richness are observed in mice fed a high calorie diet and treated with the PPI omeprazole; results varied depending on sex and genetic background (11).
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs)
Individuals with MHO or MUO are equally susceptible to developing GERD (12). Obese individuals who experience GERD commonly use PPIs to relieve heartburn and other discomfort (e.g., chest or upper abdominal pain, dysphagia, globus sensation, food regurgitation) caused by acid reflux. PPIs reduce stomach acid production by inhibiting the H+,K+-ATPase, an ion pump located on the luminal surface of gastric parietal cells, and blocking hydrochloric acid secretion (13). Through irreversible inhibition of the proton pump, PPIs yield greater acid suppression and have a longer duration of action than other acid-controlling medications such as histamine-2 receptor antagonists or antacids (13). Thus, PPIs are more favorable for reducing gastric acid secretion and relieving pain. PPIs are the medication of choice not only for GERD but also peptic ulcer disease and associated bleeding, Helicobacter pylori infection (in combination with antibiotics), NSAID-induced ulcers, erosive esophagitis, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, and functional dyspepsia (14).
Fueled by over-the-counter availability, PPI usage has steadily increased since 2003, when omeprazole (Prilosec) was FDA-approved for purchase without a prescription (15). Approximately 15 million Americans use PPIs annually (16). The number of documented indications for PPI use has also increased (17). PPIs are commonly administered in the outpatient, ambulatory care setting for GERD-related symptoms and in the inpatient, critical care setting for stress ulcer prophylaxis. Shortly following OTC availability, many PPI users continued to take these medications, even without documented GI complaints and/or diagnoses or other indications for use (17). Individuals still frequently remain on PPIs long-term (clinically defined as >8 weeks) after either being initiated on therapy in non-outpatient settings or self-prescribing (17, 18). The long-term use of PPIs is especially concerning due to numerous possible adverse side effects, including T2DM, dysbiosis, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI)-associated diarrhea, enteric infections, increased risk of community-acquired pneumonia, magnesium and vitamin B12 deficiency, osteoporosis, bone fractures, and dementia (14, 19–22).
Dysbiosis and metabolic disease
Gut microbiota are a core participant in host metabolic health by modulating digestion and absorption, whereby foodstuffs are converted into essential nutrients and minerals. A diet enriched in prebiotic and probiotic foods including plant-derived protein while limited in processed foods and animal-derived protein, healthy lifestyle, and environmental and genetic factors all support a diverse and optimal gut microbiota (23–25). The healthy human microbiota exhibits a balance of the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, which represent 90% of gut microbiota (26, 27). The remaining dominant phyla include Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia. A rich microbiota contributes to health by facilitating drug metabolism, synthesis of essential vitamins B and K, and physical and chemical protection against colonization by pathogens (7, 23, 26). These microbiota also ferment fiber and other indigestible polysaccharides, yielding short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that beneficially impact body weight, inflammatory status, insulin sensitivity, and glucose and lipid homeostasis (28).
Reduced biodiversity of gut microbiota, coupled with subsequent expansion of disease-promoting pathogens, is referred to as dysbiosis (23). Dysbiosis is a hallmark of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and is also associated with several autoimmune, neurological, and metabolic disorders, with causal evidence emerging (23, 29–35). Variations in the composition and abundance of oral and/or gut microbiota, especially at the phylum level, are implicated in metabolic disease (7, 9, 36, 37). Namely, an increase in the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio occurs in overweight and obese individuals (38). High fat diet (HFD)-fed mice show an increase in Firmicutes and decrease in Bacteroidetes proportions, leading to a higher F/B ratio vs. lean mice (36). In obese, human, metabolic syndrome recipients, allogenic fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) using metabolic syndrome donors (vs. post-gastric bypass donors) decreases insulin sensitivity, suggesting that dysbiosis can trigger MUO (39). Conversely, FMT using normal diet-fed and exercised donor mice improves metabolism and inflammatory status in HFD-fed recipients (40). However, FMT using healthy lean donors fails to potentiate the improved insulin sensitivity imparted by consumption of a healthy diet in MUO individuals (41, 42).
The F/B ratio’s validity as a reliable biomarker has been challenged by various confounding factors in study populations and lack of clear correlation between its numerical value and BMI. This discrepancy suggests that dysbiotic gut events impacting metabolic health are more nuanced (9, 27, 43, 44). Compared to MHO individuals, intestinal levels of inflammatory-associated microbiota are elevated in MUO, accompanied by lower bacterial diversity and reduced potential for butyrate production (45–47). Alpha diversity, an index of taxa richness and abundance, is lower in MUO vs. MHO adults and children (9, 47). The genera Oscillospira and Clostridum, microbial sources of beneficial SCFAs, are more abundant in MHO individuals (9). Butyrate, a key SCFA, exhibits anti-inflammatory properties by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines and GI mucosal permeability, thereby preventing inflammation mediated by the bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (9, 28). Butyrate-producing bacteria are significantly decreased in T2DM, suggesting that this SCFA confers protection against the development of insulin resistance (9). Family members of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria associated with beneficial metabolic effects are also more abundant in MHO vs. MUO individuals (48).
In contrast, Fusobacteria is more abundant in MUO individuals (9). Despite increased abundance in T2DM individuals, elevated Fusobacteria levels do not significantly correlate with increased BMI (49). Differing from most other microorganisms, Fusobacteria is abundant with intestinal inflammation (9). Fusobacteria are established oral pathogens well-implicated in colorectal cancer, where they upregulate the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-6, and interleukin-8 as well as cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme (50). As gram-negative microorganisms, Fusobacteria also contribute to inflammation via the LPS component of their cell wall (51). In addition to increased LPS release, elevated cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, reduced bioavailability of nitric oxide (a central regulator of energy metabolism and body composition), and decreased SCFA production occur with obesity (26, 27, 43). These events create conditions that promote inflammation, induce endothelial dysfunction, and reduce insulin sensitivity, which leads to further inflammation, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and other cardiometabolic dysfunction.
Diet- and oral PPI-induced dysbiosis
Diet composition and oral ingestion of medications substantially influence microbiota diversity (23, 26, 27, 52). Diets enriched in saturated fat, protein, and complex carbohydrates decrease gut microbiota biodiversity through the production of toxic metabolites or by overfeeding certain families of potentially pathogenic organisms (23). These diets increase gram-negative bacteria like Escherichia coli that harbor LPS and decrease the prevalence of favorable gram-positive bacteria that help maintain the gut mucosal barrier to protect against endotoxins (53, 54). Metabolic endotoxemia, approximately a two-fold increase in circulating LPS levels from baseline, is one mechanism by which dysbiosis and leaky gut elicit the systemic inflammation and insulin resistance that characterize MUO (55, 56). Systemic administration of LPS to lean mice increases fat deposition, systemic and tissue-specific inflammation, and insulin resistance to a similar extent as that caused by diet-induced obesity (DIO) (55). Furthermore, serum LPS levels are 1.5-fold greater in obese mice fed a normal chow diet than in lean mice fed a HFD (55). LPS binds with LPS-binding protein (LBP) to trigger the toll-like receptor 4 signaling cascade, which activates the inflammatory immune response (56). Both LPS and LBP are elevated in individuals with obesity or T2DM compared to healthy controls (56). Poor diet is a major culprit in the etiology and pathogenesis of obesity partly through an LPS-mediated mechanism and is linked to GERD, driving PPI use. Obesogenic diets, particularly those high in fat, increase GERD risk by lowering esophageal sphincter (LES) tone, increasing transient LES relaxation, and delaying gastric emptying (57, 58). These diets also elevate intestinal amounts of LPS-releasing, gram-negative bacteria that promote the pro-inflammatory state implicated in abnormal LES relaxation (59, 60). Esophageal microbiome analyses reveal a skewing towards gram-negative populations in esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus. This profile is strongly linked to GERD-related pathology through LPS-mediated induction of NO, promoting LES relaxtion (61, 62). Several oral medication classes alter the microbiome. With only short-term use, repeated exposure to antibiotics negatively alters microbiome composition, possibly long-term (23). A positive association between antibiotic exposure and weight gain in children has been reported (63). Compared to other commonly used medications such as statins, antibiotics, antidepressants, and metformin, PPIs impart the greatest and most consistent inter-individual variability in gut microbiota (64–68). PPI use is linked to increased risk of CDI by altering CDI-associated taxa, increasing gastric pH, and delaying gastric emptying (69–72). Comprehensive meta-analyses determined that PPI use increases the risk of developing initial and recurrent CDI by two- and 1.5-fold, respectively (73, 74). Strong evidence for PPI-induced risk prompted an FDA-issued drug safety warning (75). Daily PPI use is recognized as a sole, avoidable, independent risk factor for CDI-associated mortality in a dose-dependent fashion (76).
Although PPIs are not pro-inflammatory per se, they induce changes in the gut microbiota that cause inflammation. Intestinal amounts of Enterococcus, Clostridium, and Lactobacillus increase with PPI use, whereas those of Bacteroides and Bifidobacteria decrease, elevating the F/B ratio (77–80). Compared to pre-treatment values, human participants undergoing 8-week treatment with the PPIs esomeprazole, rabeprazole, or lansoprazole had increased fecal amounts of Firmicutes due to bacterial translocation from the oral, nasal, and throat cavities to the intestine (81). Confoundingly, this study did not control for any change in diet post-GERD relief (81). Once daily administration of esomeprazole for 4 weeks increases the fecal abundance of Streptococcus (normally found in the upper GI tract), with trends for increased amounts in the saliva and periodontal pocket also observed (81). Streptococcus increases oxidative stress in the GI tract via ROS production (80). Increased Streptococcus is also associated with duodenal eosinophil infiltration both after short- and long-term PPI therapy (79). The resultant intestinal inflammation is a key factor in the development of systemic, low-grade inflammation. Omeprazole use also increases the abundance of Fusobacteria and Firmicutes in the gastric mucosa of healthy dogs (82). In rats, long-term administration of lansoprazole reduces microbiota diversity and richness, with reduced abundance of Clostridium and members of Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes (28).
Obesity likely increases the risk of stress, anxiety, and depression, especially when metabolic disturbances are present (83). In line with these findings, increased intestinal permeability stemming from PPI use and dysbiosis of gut microbiota is enhanced during psychological stress (78). In mice subjected to water avoidance stress (WAS), once daily administration of the PPIs rabeprazole, omeprazole, or lansoprazole post-stress session exacerbated WAS-induced increases in intestinal permeability and duodenal mast cell infiltration both in vivo and ex vivo; these phenomena are transferrable via gut microbiome transplantation (78). Expression of multiple duodenal tight junction adhesion molecules (at both the gene and protein levels) is also decreased with PPI treatment (78). Strengthening the notion that stress plays a causal role in the pathogenesis of obesity, PPIs do not increase intestinal permeability in the absence of stress (78).
Obesity-related and PPI-induced aberrations in short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production
The microbiome-gut-brain axis is a bidirectional communication network amongst the central nervous system (CNS), autonomic nervous system (ANS), enteric nervous system (ENS), and hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis that maintains GI and neuronal homeostasis (84). Hypothalamic neurons sense microbiota cell wall components to regulate food intake and EE (85). SCFAs are involved in microbiota-gut-brain interactions as substrates of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to positively influence host functions such as appetite, glucose homeostasis, EE, immunomodulation, and functional integrity of the GI tract (28, 52, 86, 87).
The most common SCFAs produced by the microbiome are butyrate, propionate, and acetate. Butyrate’s protective effects against obesity are pleiotropic (88). Butyrate regulates body weight by promoting EE and reducing energy intake. It induces mitochondrial function in association with up-regulated expression of genes involved in lipolysis and fatty acid β-oxidation. In brown adipose tissue, it promotes thermogenesis via activation of lysine-specific demethylase and β3-adrenergic receptors. Along the gut-brain axis, it inhibits weight gain by promoting satiety and reducing food intake by suppressing the activity of hypothalamic orexigenic neurons. Butyrate’s hypophagic and anorectic effects are mediated by increased levels of glucagon-like peptide 1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, and gut hormone peptide YY, as well as up-regulation of the mu-opioid receptor. In the liver, butyrate upregulates antioxidant systems by promoting β-oxidation and stimulating fibroblast growth factor 21 through activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α. These hepatic events are accompanied by reduced inflammation, lipid deposition, and cholesterol synthesis. In adipose tissue, it induces leptin production and secretion, promotes β-oxidation, and inhibits inflammation. In the pancreas, it promotes insulin secretion and inhibits glucagon secretion. In the gut, it influences the expression of colonic tight junction proteins to control gut permeability (88).
Decreased SCFA production, particularly butyrate-producing microbes, as a consequence of consuming a Western-style diet is implicated in obesity and other metabolic diseases (88, 89). Conversely, dietary supplementation with acetate, propionate, butyrate, or their admixture inhibits HFD-induced weight gain in mice (36). GPR41 and GPR43 are mammalian GPCRs located in adipose tissue, GI epithelium, and lymphatic tissue that are upregulated by circulating LPS and systemic inflammation (90). HFD intake lowers gene transcript levels of GPR41 and GPR43 in adipose tissue and elevates levels in colon vs. lean mice; SCFA supplementation reverses these effects (36). Long-term administration of lansoprazole to rats reduces intestinal and colonic butyrate concentrations, especially in old age (91). Moreover, the abundance of Lactobacillus in the ileum is significantly and positively correlated with butyrate concentration in the duodenum and ascending colon and positively correlated with butyrate levels in the jejunum (91). Of note, SCFAs do not always impart beneficial effects on metabolic health. Some preclinical data indicate that signaling at GPR41 and GPR43 is associated with DIO and inflammatory disease (90). These observations reflect the complex manner through which the microbiome regulates inflammation and metabolism.
Discussion
Obesity is a multifactorial condition associated with multiple concomitant diseases through a myriad of complex mechanisms. Obesity resides on a spectrum ranging from healthy to unhealthy, whereby adipogenesis and inflammation mediate its comorbidities including dyslipidemia, cardiovascular dysfunction, and insulin resistance. FMT data indicate that MUO may stem from unfavorable alterations in gut microbiota (39–42). This dysbiosis simultaneously inhibits the production of beneficial, health-promoting metabolites (i.e., SCFAs) and promotes the production of pro-inflammatory, harmful ones (i.e., LPS).
Genetic and environmental factors influence the microbiome. Diet composition is one key environmental factor. Oral medications such as antibiotics also negatively alter the microbiome, potentially compromising its natural diversity years after initial exposure. Emerging evidence identifies PPIs as another culprit medication class associated with dysbiosis. In most cases, the intended duration of PPI use is only up to 8 weeks. Alarmingly, long-term PPI use is increasingly common in obese and pediatric populations (92, 93). This could permanently alter microbiome composition, and many associative findings and emerging causal evidence indicate that it deleteriously affects metabolic health long-term. Yet the full impact of short- and long-term PPI use on altering gut microbiome composition and the extent to which dysbiosis contributes to MUO in humans remains largely unknown, as no clinical trials have examined these questions to date.
Attempts to prevent/attenuate negative impacts on metabolic health related to PPI-associated dysbiosis might involve curtailing the following: physician overprescribing, direct-to-consumer advertising, misdiagnosis, self-diagnosis, and treating symptoms rather than the cause(s) of acid reflux. Although data are limited, taking probiotics and eating prebiotic foods rich in antioxidants and dietary fiber appear to be beneficial (92, 94, 95). High fiber diet improves metabolic health and mood in T2DM patients (96). In children, once daily co-administration of probiotics substantially reduced dysbiosis occurrence in response to 12-week, once daily esomeprazole vs. esomeprazole treatment alone from 56.2% to 6.2%, respectively (92). Other studies report mixed findings regarding the beneficial effects of supplementation with Streptococcus, Lactobacillus and/or Bifidobacterium on body weight, BMI, waist circumference, and fat mass (97). A clinical trial analyzing the effects of probiotics to reduce dysbiosis and GI discomfort in adult GERD patients using PPIs long-term is currently underway (98). The benefits of probiotic use outweigh any potential risks. Namely, probiotics prevent and treat antibiotic-associated dysbiosis and diarrhea (99). Probiotic use would likely be equally beneficial for PPI-induced dysbiosis and associated metabolic dysfunction.
Author contributions
MB, TS, TF, and AW conceptualized and drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Bray GA, Kim KK, Wilding JPH. Obesity: a chronic relapsing progressive disease process. a position statement of the world obesity federation. Obes Rev (2017) 18(7):715–23. doi: 10.1111/OBR.12551
2. Warren M, Beck S, West M. The state of obesity 2022. trust for america’s health. Available at: https://www.tfah.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/2022ObesityReport_FINAL3923.pdf (Accessed January 17, 2023).
3. Ward ZJ, Bleich SN, Long MW, Gortmaker SL. Association of body mass index with health care expenditures in the united states by age and sex. PloS One (2021) 16(3). doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0247307
4. Blüher M. Metabolically healthy obesity. Endocr Rev (2020) 41(3):405–20. doi: 10.1210/ENDREV/BNAA004
5. Iacobini C, Pugliese G, Blasetti Fantauzzi C, Federici M, Menini S. Metabolically healthy versus metabolically unhealthy obesity. Metabolism (2019) 92:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.11.009
6. Jacobson BC, Somers SC, Fuchs CS, Kelly CP, Carlos A. Camargo jr. association between body mass index and gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in both normal weight and overweight women. N Engl J Med (2006) 354(22):2340. doi: 10.1056/NEJMOA054391
7. Wu J, Wang K, Wang X, Pang Y, Jiang C. The role of the gut microbiome and its metabolites in metabolic diseases. Protein Cell (2021) 12(5):360. doi: 10.1007/S13238-020-00814-7
8. El-Serag HB, Graham DY, Satia JA, Rabeneck L. Obesity is an independent risk factor for GERD symptoms and erosive esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol (2005) 100(6):1243–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41703.x
9. Kim MH, Yun KE, Kim J, Park E, Chang Y, Ryu S, et al. Gut microbiota and metabolic health among overweight and obese individuals. Sci Rep (2020) 10:1. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76474-8
10. Smith GI, Mittendorfer B, Klein S. Metabolically healthy obesity: facts and fantasies. J Clin Invest (2019) 129(10):3978. doi: 10.1172/JCI129186
11. Saqui-Salces M, Tsao AC, Gillilland MG, Merchant JL. Weight gain in mice on a high caloric diet and chronically treated with omeprazole depends on sex and genetic background. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (2017) 312(1):G15–23. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00211.2016
12. Kim TJ, Lee H, Baek SY, Kim K, Min YW, Min BH, et al. Metabolically healthy obesity and the risk of erosive esophagitis: a cohort study. Clin Transl Gastroenterol (2019) 10(9). doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000077
13. Shin JM, Sachs G. Pharmacology of proton pump inhibitors. Curr Gastroenterol Rep (2008) 10(6):528. doi: 10.1007/S11894-008-0098-4
14. Strand DS, Kim D, Peura DA. 25 years of proton pump inhibitors: a comprehensive review. Gut Liver (2017) 11(1):27. doi: 10.5009/GNL15502
15. Prescription to over-the-Counter (OTC) switch list. FDA. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/center-drug-evaluation-and-research-cder/prescription-over-counter-otc-switch-list (Accessed January 18, 2023).
16. Benmassaoud A, McDonald EG, Lee TC. Potential harms of proton pump inhibitor therapy: rare adverse effects of commonly used drugs. CMAJ (2016) 188(9):657–62. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150570
17. Rotman SR, Bishop TF. Proton pump inhibitor use in the U.S. ambulatory setting, 2002–2009. PloS One (2013) 8(2):e56060. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0056060
18. Haastrup PF, Jarbøl DE, Thompson W, Hansen JM, Søndergaard J, Rasmussen S. When does proton pump inhibitor treatment become long term? a scoping review. BMJ Open Gastroenterol (2021) 8(1):563. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000563
19. Reimer C. Safety of long-term PPI therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol (2013) 27(3):443–54. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.06.001
20. Scarpignato C, Tolone S. Addressing long-term PPI safety. Digestive Liver Dis (2020) 52(8):853–6. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.05.025
21. Ambizas EM, Etzel JV. Proton pump inhibitors: considerations with long-term use. US Pharmacist (2017) 42(7):4–7.
22. Ciardullo S, Rea F, Savaré L, Morabito G, Perseghin G, Corrao G. Prolonged use of proton pump inhibitors and risk of type 2 diabetes: results from a large population-based nested case-control study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2022) 107(7):e2671–9. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac231
23. Weiss GA, Hennet T. Mechanisms and consequences of intestinal dysbiosis. Cell Mol Life Sci (2017) 74:16. doi: 10.1007/S00018-017-2509-X
24. Singh RK, Chang HW, Yan D, Lee KM, Ucmak D, Wong K, et al. Influence of diet on the gut microbiome and implications for human health. J Transl Med (2017) 15(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12967-017-1175-y
25. Bolte LA, Vich Vila A, Imhann F, Collij V, Gacesa R, Peters V, et al. Long-term dietary patterns are associated with pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory features of the gut microbiome. Gut (2021) 70(7):1287–98. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322670
26. Tidjani Alou M, Lagier JC, Raoult D. Diet influence on the gut microbiota and dysbiosis related to nutritional disorders. Hum Microb J (2016) 1:3–11. doi: 10.1016/J.HUMIC.2016.09.001
27. Rinninella E, Raoul P, Cintoni M, Franceschi F, Miggiano GAD, Gasbarrini A, et al. What is the healthy gut microbiota composition? a changing ecosystem across age, environment, diet, and diseases. Microorganisms (2019) 7(1):14. doi: 10.3390/MICROORGANISMS7010014
28. Blaak EE, Canfora EE, Theis S, Frost G, Groen AK, Mithieux G, et al. Short chain fatty acids in human gut and metabolic health. Benef Microbes (2020) 11(5):411–55. doi: 10.3920/BM2020.0057
29. Xu Q, Ni JJ, Han BX, Yan SS, Wei XT, Feng GJ, et al. Causal relationship between gut microbiota and autoimmune diseases: a two-sample mendelian randomization study. Front Immunol (2021) 12:746998. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.746998
30. Unger MM, Spiegel J, Dillmann KU, Grundmann D, Philippeit H, Burmann J, et al. Short chain fatty acids and gut microbiota differ between patients with parkinson’s disease and age-matched controls. Parkinsonism Relat Disord (2016) 32:66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.08.019
31. Cattaneo A, Cattane N, Galluzzi S, Provasi S, Lopizzo N, Festari C, et al. Association of brain amyloidosis with pro-inflammatory gut bacterial taxa and peripheral inflammation markers in cognitively impaired elderly. Neurobiol Aging (2017) 49:60–8. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.08.019
32. Wang Y, Li L, Zhao X, Sui S, Wang Q, Shi G, et al. Intestinal microflora changes in patients with mild alzheimer’s disease in a Chinese cohort. J Alzheimers Dis (2022) 88(2):563–75. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220076
33. Le Chatelier E, Nielsen T, Qin J, Prifti E, Hildebrand F, Falony G, et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature (2013) 500(7464):541–6. doi: 10.1038/nature12506
34. Cui J, Ramesh G, Wu M, Jensen ET, Crago O, Bertoni AG, et al. Butyrate-producing bacteria and insulin homeostasis: the microbiome and insulin longitudinal evaluation study (MILES). Diabetes (2022) 71(11):2438–46. doi: 10.2337/db22-0168
35. Mousa WK, Chehadeh F, Husband S. Microbial dysbiosis in the gut drives systemic autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol (2022) 13:906258. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.906258
36. Lu Y, Fan C, Li P, Lu Y, Chang X, Qi K. Short chain fatty acids prevent high-fat-diet-induced obesity in mice by regulating g protein-coupled receptors and gut microbiota. Sci Rep (2016) 6(1):1–13. doi: 10.1038/srep37589
37. Boulangé CL, Neves AL, Chilloux J, Nicholson JK, Dumas ME. Impact of the gut microbiota on inflammation, obesity, and metabolic disease. Genome Med (2016) 8(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0303-2
38. Magne F, Gotteland M, Gauthier L, Zazueta A, Pesoa S, Navarrete P, et al. The firmicutes/bacteroidetes ratio: a relevant marker of gut dysbiosis in obese patients? Nutrients (2020) 12(5). doi: 10.3390/nu12051474
39. de Groot P, Scheithauer T, Bakker GJ, Prodan A, Levin E, Khan MT, et al. Donor metabolic characteristics drive effects of faecal microbiota transplantation on recipient insulin sensitivity, energy expenditure and intestinal transit time. Gut (2020) 69(3):502–12. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318320
40. Lai ZL, Tseng CH, Ho HJ, Cheung CKY, Lin JY, Chen YJ, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation confers beneficial metabolic effects of diet and exercise on diet-induced obese mice. Sci Rep (2018) 8(1):15625. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33893-y
41. Yu EW, Gao L, Stastka P, Cheney MC, Mahabamunuge J, Torres Soto M, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation for the improvement of metabolism in obesity: the FMT-TRIM double-blind placebo-controlled pilot trial. PloS Med (2020) 17(3):e1003051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003051
42. Koopen AM, Almeida EL, Attaye I, Witjes JJ, Rampanelli E, Majait S, et al. Effect of fecal microbiota transplantation combined with Mediterranean diet on insulin sensitivity in subjects with metabolic syndrome. Front Microbiol (2021) 12:662159. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.662159
43. Tseng CH, Wu CY. The gut microbiome in obesity. J Formosan Med Assoc (2019) 118:S3–9. doi: 10.1016/J.JFMA.2018.07.009
44. Mathur R, Barlow GM. Obesity and the microbiome. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol (2015) 9(8):1087–99. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2015.1051029
45. Olivares PDSG, Pacheco ABF, Aranha LN, Oliveira BS, Santos AA, Neto JFN, et al. Gut microbiota of adults with different metabolic phenotypes. Nutrition (2021) 90:111293. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2021.111293
46. Zeng Q, Yang Z, Wang F, Li D, Liu Y, Wang D, et al. Association between metabolic status and gut microbiome in obese populations. Microb Genom (2021) 7(8). doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000639
47. Alcazar M, Escribano J, Ferré N, Closa-Monasterolo R, Selma-Royo M, Feliu A, et al. Gut microbiota is associated with metabolic health in children with obesity. Clin Nutr (2022) 41(8):1680–8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.06.007
48. Proffitt C, Bidkhori G, Moyes D, Shoaie S. Disease, drugs and dysbiosis: understanding microbial signatures in metabolic disease and medical interventions. Microorganisms (2020) 8(9):1–16. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091381
49. Sedighi M, Razavi S, Navab-Moghadam F, Khamseh ME, Alaei-Shahmiri F, Mehrtash A, et al. Comparison of gut microbiota in adult patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy individuals. Microb Pathog (2017) 111:362–9. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.08.038
50. Kelly D, Yang L, Pei Z. Gut microbiota, fusobacteria, and colorectal cancer. Diseases (2018) 6(4):109. doi: 10.3390/DISEASES6040109
51. Su W, Chen Y, Cao P, Chen Y, Guo Y, Wang S, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes the development of ulcerative colitis by inducing the autophagic cell death of intestinal epithelial. Front Cell Infect Microbiol (2020) 10:594806. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.594806
52. Jandhyala SM, Talukdar R, Subramanyam C, Vuyyuru H, Sasikala M, Reddy DN. Role of the normal gut microbiota. World J Gastroenterol (2015) 21(29):8787. doi: 10.3748/WJG.V21.I29.8787
53. Amabebe E, Robert FO, Agbalalah T, Orubu ESF. Microbial dysbiosis-induced obesity: role of gut microbiota in homoeostasis of energy metabolism. Br J Nutr (2020) 123(10):1127–37. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520000380
54. Akagbosu CO, Nadler EP, Levy S, Hourigan SK. The role of the gut microbiome in pediatric obesity and bariatric surgery. Int J Mol Sci (2022) 23(23). doi: 10.3390/IJMS232315421
55. Boutagy NE, McMillan RP, Frisard MI, Hulver MW. Metabolic endotoxemia with obesity: is it real and is it relevant? Biochimie (2016) 124:11. doi: 10.1016/J.BIOCHI.2015.06.020
56. Mohammad S, Thiemermann C. Role of metabolic endotoxemia in systemic inflammation and potential interventions. Front Immunol (2020) 11:594150. doi: 10.3389/FIMMU.2020.594150
57. Nebel OT, Castell DO. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure changes after food ingestion. Gastroenterology (1972) 63(5):778–83. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(19)33219-6
58. Nebel OT, Castell DO. Inhibition of the lower oesophageal sphincter by fat–a mechanism for fatty food intolerance. Gut (1973) 14(4):270–4. doi: 10.1136/gut.14.4.270
59. Yang L, Francois F, Pei Z. Molecular pathways: pathogenesis and clinical implications of microbiome alteration in esophagitis and Barrett esophagus. Clin Cancer Res (2012) 18(8):2138–44. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0934
60. D’Souza SM, Houston K, Keenan L, Yoo BS, Parekh PJ, Johnson DA. Role of microbial dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of esophageal mucosal disease: a paradigm shift from acid to bacteria? World J Gastroenterol (2021) 27(18):2054–72. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i18.2054
61. Yang L, Lu X, Nossa CW, Francois F, Peek RM, Pei Z. Inflammation and intestinal metaplasia of the distal esophagus are associated with alterations in the microbiome. Gastroenterology (2009) 137(2):588–97. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.046
62. Fan YP, Chakder S, Gao F, Rattan S. Inducible and neuronal nitric oxide synthase involvement in lipopolysaccharide-induced sphincteric dysfunction. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (2001) 280(1):G32–42. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.2001.280.1.G32
63. Duong QA, Pittet LF, Curtis N, Zimmermann P. Antibiotic exposure and adverse long-term health outcomes in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infection (2022) 85(3):213–300. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.01.005
64. Zhernakova A, Kurilshikov A, Bonder MJ, Tigchelaar EF, Schirmer M, Vatanen T, et al. Population-based metagenomics analysis reveals markers for gut microbiome composition and diversity. Science (2016) 352(6285):565–9. doi: 10.1126/science.aad3369
65. Imhann F, Vich Vila A, Bonder MJ, Lopez Manosalva AG, Koonen DPY, Fu J, et al. The influence of proton pump inhibitors and other commonly used medication on the gut microbiota. Gut Microbes (2017) 8(4):351–8. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2017.1284732
66. Vich Vila A, Collij V, Sanna S, Sinha T, Imhann F, Bourgonje AR, et al. Impact of commonly used drugs on the composition and metabolic function of the gut microbiota. Nat Commun (2020) 11(1):362. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14177-z
67. Weersma RK, Zhernakova A, Fu J. Interaction between drugs and the gut microbiome. Gut (2020) 69(8):1510–9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320204
68. Maier L, Pruteanu M, Kuhn M, Zeller G, Telzerow A, Anderson EE, et al. Extensive impact of non-antibiotic drugs on human gut bacteria. Nature (2018) 555(7698):623–8. doi: 10.1038/nature25979
69. Bavishi C, DuPont HL. Systematic review: the use of proton pump inhibitors and increased susceptibility to enteric infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther (2011) 34(11-12):1269–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04874.x
70. Imhann F, Bonder MJ, Vila AV, Fu J, Mujagic Z, Vork L, et al. Proton pump inhibitors affect the gut microbiome. Gut (2016) 65(5):740. doi: 10.1136/GUTJNL-2015-310376
71. Freedberg DE, Toussaint NC, Chen SP, Ratner AJ, Whittier S, Wang TC, et al. Proton pump inhibitors alter specific taxa in the human gastrointestinal microbiome: a crossover trial. Gastroenterology (2015) 149(4):883–5.e9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.06.043
72. Sanaka M, Yamamoto T, Kuyama Y. Effects of proton pump inhibitors on gastric emptying: a systematic review. Dig Dis Sci (2010) 55(9):2431–40. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-1076-x
73. Reveles KR, Ryan CN, Chan L, Cosimi RA, Haynes WL. Proton pump inhibitor use associated with changes in gut microbiota composition. Gut (2018) 67(7):1369–70. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315306
74. Kwok CS, Arthur AK, Anibueze CI, Singh S, Cavallazzi R, Loke YK. Risk of clostridium difficile infection with acid suppressing drugs and antibiotics: meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol (2012) 107(7):1011–9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.108
75. Maes ML, Fixen DR, Linnebur SA. Adverse effects of proton-pump inhibitor use in older adults: a review of the evidence. Ther Adv Drug Saf (2017) 8(9):273–97. doi: 10.1177/2042098617715381
76. Lin CY, Cheng HT, Kuo CJ, Lee YS, Sung CM, Keidan M, et al. Proton pump inhibitor-induced gut dysbiosis increases mortality rates for patients with clostridioides difficile infection. Microbiol Spectr (2022) 10(4). doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00486-22
77. Bruno G, Zaccari P, Rocco G, Scalese G, Panetta C, Porowska B, et al. Proton pump inhibitors and dysbiosis: current knowledge and aspects to be clarified. World J Gastroenterol (2019) 25(22):2706–19. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i22.2706
78. Takashima S, Tanaka F, Kawaguchi Y, Usui Y, Fujimoto K, Nadatani Y, et al. Proton pump inhibitors enhance intestinal permeability via dysbiosis of gut microbiota under stressed conditions in mice. Neurogastroenterol Motil (2020) 32(7). doi: 10.1111/nmo.13841
79. Wauters L, Tito RY, Ceulemans M, Lambaerts M, Accarie A, Rymenans L, et al. Duodenal dysbiosis and relation to the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in functional dyspepsia. Int J Mol Sci (2021) 22(24). doi: 10.3390/ijms222413609
80. Shi YC, Cai ST, Tian YP, Zhao HJ, Zhang YB, Chen J, et al. Effects of proton pump inhibitors on the gastrointestinal microbiota in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Genomics Proteomics Bioinf (2019) 17(1):52–63. doi: 10.1016/J.GPB.2018.12.004
81. Hojo M, Asahara T, Nagahara A, Takeda T, Matsumoto K, Ueyama H, et al. Gut microbiota composition before and after use of proton pump inhibitors. Dig Dis Sci (2018) 63(11):2940–9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5122-4
82. Garcia-Mazcorro JF, Suchodolski JS, Jones KR, Clark-Price SC, Dowd SE, Minamoto Y, et al. Effect of the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole on the gastrointestinal bacterial microbiota of healthy dogs. FEMS Microbiol Ecol (2012) 80(3):624–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01331.x
83. Abiri B, Hosseinpanah F, Banihashem S, Madinehzad SA, Valizadeh M. Mental health and quality of life in different obesity phenotypes: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes (2022) 20(1). doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01974-2
84. Carabotti M, Scirocco A, Maselli MA, Severi C. The gut-brain axis: interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems. Ann Gastroenterol (2015) 28(2):203–9.
85. Gabanyi I, Lepousez G, Wheeler R, Vieites-Prado A, Nissant A, Wagner S, et al. Bacterial sensing via neuronal Nod2 regulates appetite and body temperature. Sci (1979) (2022) 376(6590). doi: 10.1126/science.abj3986
86. Jung TH, Han KS, Park JH, Hwang HJ. Butyrate modulates mucin secretion and bacterial adherence in LoVo cells via MAPK signaling. PloS One (2022) 17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269872
87. Silva YP, Bernardi A, Frozza RL. The role of short-chain fatty acids from gut microbiota in gut-brain communication. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2020) 11:25. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00025
88. Coppola S, Avagliano C, Calignano A, Berni Canani R. The protective role of butyrate against obesity and obesity-related diseases. Molecules (2021) 26(3). doi: 10.3390/molecules26030682
89. Gentile CL, Weir TL. The gut microbiota at the intersection of diet and human health. Sci (1979) (2018) 362(6416):776–80. doi: 10.1126/science.aau5812
90. Ang Z, Ding JL. GPR41 and GPR43 in obesity and inflammation – protective or causative? Front Immunol (2016) 7:28. doi: 10.3389/FIMMU.2016.00028
91. Lee SM, Kim N, Nam RH, Park JH, Choi SI, Park YT, et al. Gut microbiota and butyrate level changes associated with the long-term administration of proton pump inhibitors to old rats. Sci Rep (2019) 9(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43112-x
92. Belei O, Olariu L, Dobrescu A, Marcovici T, Marginean O. Is it useful to administer probiotics together with proton pump inhibitors in children with gastroesophageal reflux? J Neurogastroenterol Motil (2018) 24(1):51–7. doi: 10.5056/jnm17059
93. Levy EI, Hoang DM, Vandenplas Y. The effects of proton pump inhibitors on the microbiome in young children. Acta Paediatr (2020) 109(8):1531–8. doi: 10.1111/apa.15213
94. Deledda A, Annunziata G, Tenore GC, Palmas V, Manzin A, Velluzzi F. Diet-derived antioxidants and their role in inflammation, obesity and gut microbiota modulation. Antioxidants (2021) 10(5). doi: 10.3390/antiox10050708
95. Djuric Z. Dietary approaches for normalizing dysbiosis induced by high-fat, obesogenic diets. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care (2023) 26(3):293–301. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000917
96. Chen L, Liu B, Ren L, Du H, Fei C, Qian C, et al. High-fiber diet ameliorates gut microbiota, serum metabolism and emotional mood in type 2 diabetes patients. Front Cell Infect Microbiol (2023) 13:1069954. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1069954
97. Abenavoli L, Scarpellini E, Colica C, Boccuto L, Salehi B, Sharifi-Rad J, et al. Gut microbiota and obesity: a role for probiotics. Nutrients (2019) 11(11). doi: 10.3390/nu11112690
98. Liu W, Xie Y, Li Y, Zheng L, Xiao Q, Zhou X, et al. Protocol of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effect of probiotics on the gut microbiome of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease treated with rabeprazole. BMC Gastroenterol (2022) 22(1). doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02320-y
Keywords: proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO), dysbiosis, inflammation, butyrate, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), probiotics
Citation: Burmeister MA, Smith TE, Fincher TK and Weldon AJ (2023) Evidence for proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)-associated dysbiosis in metabolically unhealthy obesity. Front. Endocrinol. 14:1205490. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1205490
Received: 13 April 2023; Accepted: 01 June 2023;
Published: 15 June 2023.
Edited by:
Shakilur Rahman, Jamia Hamdard University, IndiaReviewed by:
Jean-Luc Raoul, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest (ICO), FranceReidar Fossmark, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
Copyright © 2023 Burmeister, Smith, Fincher and Weldon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Melissa A. Burmeister, mburmeister@wmcarey.edu