Biological and pharmacological functions of the FGF19- and FGF21-coreceptor beta klotho

Beta klotho (KLB) is a fundamental component in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling as it serves as an obligatory coreceptor for the endocrine hormones fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) and fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21). Through the development of FGF19- and FGF21 mimetics, KLB has emerged as a promising drug target for treating various metabolic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes (T2D), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and cardiovascular disease. While rodent studies have significantly increased our understanding of KLB function, current clinical trials that test the safety and efficacy of KLB-targeting drugs raise many new scientific questions about human KLB biology. Although most KLB-targeting drugs can modulate disease activity in humans, individual patient responses differ substantially. In addition, species-specific differences in KLB tissue distribution may explain why the glucose-lowering effects that were observed in preclinical studies are not fully replicated in clinical trials. Besides, the long-term efficacy of KLB-targeting drugs might be limited by various pathophysiological conditions known to reduce the expression of KLB. Moreover, FGF19/FGF21 administration in humans is also associated with gastrointestinal side effects, which are currently unexplained. A better understanding of human KLB biology could help to improve the efficacy and safety of existing or novel KLB/FGFR-targeting drugs. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of KLB biology, including genetic variants and their phenotypic associations, transcriptional regulation, protein structure, tissue distribution, subcellular localization, and function. In addition, we will highlight recent developments regarding the safety and efficacy of KLB-targeting drugs in clinical trials. These insights may direct the development and testing of existing and future KLB-targeting drugs.

1 Introduction

The identification of the KLB gene was preceded by the discovery of a homologous gene designated klotho (α-klotho or Kl) that was found to be involved in aging (1). Deficiency of the Kl gene in mice results in a syndrome that resembles human aging, characterized by a short lifespan, infertility, atherosclerosis, skin atrophy, osteoporosis, and emphysema (2). Around a decade later, it was demonstrated that KL serves as an obligatory coreceptor for FGF23, a member of the FGF superfamily (3). The connection between KL and FGF23 was partly made by the observation that Fgf23- and Kl-deficient mice have a similar complex aging phenotype (1). Currently, the FGF23-KL axis is mainly known for regulating phosphate homeostasis, which is achieved through increasing urinary phosphate excretion and lowering levels of the mineral-regulating hormones parathyroid hormone and vitamin D (1). The role of the FGF23-KL axis in controlling phosphate homeostasis also partly explains the premature aging of Fgfr23- and Kl-deficient mice, as aging symptoms are reduced by consuming a low-phosphate diet (4).

A homology search using the Kl sequence led to the identification of a partial cDNA clone in the GenBank database (5). Using primers designed from this partial cDNA clone, the full-length mouse cDNA clone was isolated, which showed 41.2% amino acid sequence similarity to KL and was therefore termed beta klotho (KLB) (5). The subsequent generation of a Klb-deficient mouse model showed that these mice are characterized by a strongly elevated synthesis and excretion of bile acids (6). In these mice, suppression of cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (Cyp7a1), the rate-limiting enzyme in bile acid (BA) synthesis, was substantially impaired (6). Strong phenotypic similarities between Fgfr4-, Klb-, and Fgf15-deficient mice such as high BA production and increased Cyp7a1 expression, led to the idea that this complex acts as a negative feedback loop in BA synthesis through transcriptional repression of Cyp7a1 (6–8). Not much later, the concept that KLB may serve as a coreceptor in FG15/FGFR4 signaling, similar to the role of KL in FGF23/FGFR signaling, was put forward and confirmed (9, 10). In addition, around the same period, it was shown that the activity of a related FGF member, FGF21, also depended on KLB (9). Based on these scientific milestones, the KLB gene has now been identified to encode a single-pass transmembrane protein that functions as a high-affinity receptor for FGF19 and FGF21.

The co-factor requirement of FGF19, FGF21, and FGF23 set these FGFs apart from canonical FGF family members. The FGF family comprises 22 closely related proteins that are secreted from cells (11). Functional classification of FGF proteins shows that most members of the FGF family function as autocrine/paracrine hormones. Upon secretion, autocrine/paracrine FGFs bind to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG), which limits their diffusion into the interstitial space and regulates their activity. In addition, the three endocrine FGFs, FGF19, FGF21, and FGF23, have lost their ability to bind HSPG and can diffuse into the bloodstream. Instead of binding to HSPG, endocrine FGFs evolved to bind KL (FGF23) or KLB (FGF19 and FGF21). The binding of FGFs to HSPG or KL/KLB facilitates their interaction with FGF receptors (FGFRs) (12). Four FGFR genes (FGFR1-4) have been identified in humans and mice. The binding of FGF ligands to FGFRs results in receptor stimulation and downstream activation of at least four canonical signaling pathways, including MAPK, PI3K, PLCγ, and STAT. Ultimately, altered FGFR activity is linked to the modulation of a wide range of cellular responses, such as growth, proliferation, differentiation, migration, and apoptosis (13).

While most FGFs play a role in embryonic development, FGF15/FGF19 and FGF21 emerged as critical regulators of metabolic homeostasis during adulthood (8, 14). Subsequent preclinical studies have shown that pharmacological administration of recombinant FGF19 or FGF21, or antibodies directed against KLB/FGFR have potent, partially overlapping metabolic effects, including the lowering of blood glucose levels, hepatic fat content, and plasma bile acid and cholesterol levels, highlighting their potential as new drug candidates for the treatment of various obesity-related disorders, including T2D, NAFLD, cardiovascular disease, and cholestasis (15). The metabolic effects of FGFs appear to be primarily driven by selective targeting of KLB/FGFR4 in the liver and KLB/FGFR1 in the adipose tissue and certain brain areas (16). Although rodent studies have contributed significantly to our understanding of FGF19/FGF21 and KLB function, clinical trials testing the safety and efficacy of KLB-targeting drugs raise the question of how these biologicals act in humans. Given the central role of KLB in determining the specificity and activity of FGF-mimetics, a better understanding of human KLB function is urgently needed. In this review, we describe the current knowledge of KLB biology, including its genetic variants, transcriptional regulation, protein structure, tissue distribution, subcellular localization, and function.

2 KLB: from gene to protein

2.1 Genetic KLB variants and their phenotypic associations

The KLB gene is localized on chromosome 4 of the human genome and is composed of 5 exons, spanning a total length of 44.604 base pairs. Within this genetic locus, whole-exome sequencing and whole-genome sequencing studies have identified thousands of genetic variants, of which the functional and pathophysiological consequences remain largely unknown. The Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), comprised of aggregated data from 125,748 exomes and 15,708 genomes, reports 980 germline KLB gene variants, counting 251 synonymous, 477 missense, and 12 loss-of-function (LoF) variants (17). Interestingly, the number of observed LoF variants is around four times lower than the expected number of LoF variants (12 vs. 45.7) within this gene, with no homozygous LoF carriers identified in this cohort. Similarly, the observed number of missense variants is also lower than the number of expected missense variants (477 vs. 607.6), with only 16 of the 477 missense variants present in a homozygous state. In contrast, the expected and observed numbers of synonymous variants in the KLB gene are similar (258.2 vs. 251). These findings suggest that the KLB gene is under selection against LoF and missense variants, indicating that harmful KLB variants are removed from the population by natural selection.

The Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) database, which provides genetic information observed in 132,345 sequenced genomes, reports similar numbers of synonymous (220), missense (426), and LoF (33) variants in the KLB gene compared to the gnomAD (18). However, due to a 10-fold greater number of completely sequenced genomes in TOPMed compared to gnomAD, the total number of intergenic variants in the TOPMed database is much higher, bringing the total number of KLB variants to more than 10,000. Similar to gnomAD, no homozygous LoF carriers were observed in TOPMed. Also, only 12 out of 426 missense variants are in a homozygous state. Thus, both gnomAD and TOPMed show that the KLB gene is genetically constrained, and that complete loss of both alleles is extremely rare. Consequently, sequencing larger numbers of genomes, as currently performed by the UK Biobank, which is expected to release genetic data of all 500,000 participants at the end of 2023, may reveal if homozygous LoF carriers exist.

2.1.1 Phenotypic associations of the KLB variant Arg728Gln

Although the functional and clinical relevance of genetic variation in the KLB gene remains largely unclear, several studies have reported associations between KLB variants and phenotypic outcomes or disease (Table 1). To understand the genetic factors contributing to BA malabsorption in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D), Wong et al. tested the association of 15 common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 7 genes critical to BA metabolism with symptom-based subgroups (19). SNP rs17618244 (Arg728Gln in KLB) was associated with colonic transit at 24 hours. Specifically, the G allele (Arg728) was associated with increased colonic transit compared to the A allele (Gln728). In addition, interaction tests revealed that two missense variants in FGFR4 (Val10Ile and Gly388Arg) significantly affected the association of Arg728Gln with colonic transit. Furthermore, functional analysis of these KLB variants showed that Arg728 reduced KLB protein stability compared to Gln728 (19). Reduced protein stability of the Arg728 variant might weaken FGF19 binding and signaling, resulting in increased CYP7A1 expression and elevated BA synthesis that eventually causes an accelerated colonic transit (19).

TABLE 1

Table 1 Overview of KLB gene variants and their phenotypic associations reported in the literature.

More recently, two other studies found that the Arg728Gln KLB variant is also associated with liver damage in children and adults with NAFLD (20, 21). Because the FGF19 pathway and bile acids are suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD (24, 25), Dongiovanni et al. addressed the impact of the Arg728Gln KLB variant on liver damage in 249 pediatric patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD (20). In this study, Arg728Gln was linked to an increased risk of ballooning and lobular inflammation. Overexpression of Arg728Gln in HepG2 and Huh7 cells decreased KLB protein expression, increased intracellular lipid accumulation, and caused an upregulation of lipotoxic and inflammatory genes (20). Another study from the same group examined the impact of Arg728Gln on liver damage in 1111 adults with NAFLD, showing that Arg728Gln was associated with fibrosis and lobular inflammation but not with steatosis (21). Similar to their previous study, overexpression of Arg728Gln decreased KLB protein levels in LX-2 cells. In addition, Arg728Gln overexpression induced pro-fibrogenic genes and enhanced LX-2 proliferation (21). Decreased KLB protein expression due to the substitution of Arg to Gln in these studies conflicts with the study of Wong et al., who showed that Arg728, and not Gln728, decreased protein stability (19). Therefore, additional functional analyses are needed to demonstrate how this variant behaves in different cellular contexts and to what extent it affects downstream FGFR signaling and cellular function.

2.1.2 Phenotypic associations of other KLB variants

While the association of KLB variants with colonic transit and liver damage fits well with the known function of KLB as a critical regulator of bile acid homeostasis, other KLB variants were linked with phenotypes less clearly connected to bile acid metabolism, including alcohol intake, congenital hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (CHH), and insulin-mediated pseudoacromegaly (IMPA) (22, 23, 26). In a genome-wide association meta-analysis and replication study among >105,000 individuals, a variant located in intron 1 of the KLB gene (rs11940694, A>G) was associated with alcohol consumption (26). A link between alcohol intake and KLB is supported by the observation that ethanol is one of the most potent inducers of plasma FGF21 in humans (27–29). In rodents and non-human primates, various mechanistic studies have also demonstrated causal effects between FGF21/KLB and alcohol intake. Administration of recombinant FGF21 or its transgenic overexpression reduced alcohol preference in mice, an effect that was absent in mice with a brain-specific deficiency of KLB (26). Similarly, the administration of the FGF21 analog PF-05231023 reduced alcohol consumption in non-human primates (30, 31). Mechanistically, FGF21 targets KLB-expressing neurons in the basolateral amygdala, which project to the nucleus accumbens to lower alcohol intake (30). Besides regulation of alcohol intake, FGF21 has also been reported to counteract alcohol intoxication by activating noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus, a brain region controlling arousal and alertness (32). As plasma ethanol clearance was not affected in liver-specific FGF21- or neuron-specific KLB-deficient mice, the FGF21-KLB axis is suggested to counteract alcohol intoxication without modulating alcohol catabolism (32). Interestingly, Cas9-mediated knockout (KO) of KLB in human hepatocyte cell lines does modulate the expression of genes involved in alcohol metabolism, revealing potential species differences in KLB-dependent regulation of peripheral alcohol metabolism (33).

CHH is a rare disorder characterized by the absence or delay of puberty and infertility due to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) deficiency. CHH can be caused by mutations in more than 30 genes (22). FGFR1 is the most frequently mutated gene in CHH and participates in developing and maintaining GnRH neurons. Previous studies have shown that the FGFR1 mutation Leu342Ser impaired FGFR1-KLB interaction and reduced FGF21 signaling. Therefore, mutations in KLB might be involved in CHH. Xu et al. performed a genetic screening on 334 CHH patients and identified seven heterozygous KLB variants in 13 patients (22). The functional effects of these KLB variants were determined in various cell-based assays (Table 1). All KLB variants, except Arg309Trp, demonstrated reduced maximal FGF21 response compared to wild-type KLB. In contrast, Arg309Trp showed a decreased EC_50, indicating reduced FGF21 affinity. Co-immunoprecipitation studies revealed that all KLB variants exhibited regular binding to FGFR1c. Similarly, the KLB variants did not affect KLB protein levels. In contrast, the Arg309Trp, Arg424Cys, K815E, and L1011P variants were characterized by altered glycosylation. In addition, Arg309Trp, Arg309Gln, Phe777delPhe, Lys815Glu, and Leu1011Pro variants exhibited reduced cell surface expression compared to wildtype KLB. Therefore, impaired functionality was demonstrated for all KLB variants. Furthermore, according to guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), all KLB variants were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, except for Leu1011Pro, which was classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Support for the role of KLB in regulating puberty and fertility was provided by showing that deficiency of Klb in mice led to delayed puberty, altered estrous cyclicity, and subfertility. In addition, FGF21-stimulated release of GnRH from GnRH neurons derived from Klb-KO mice was strongly blunted (22).

Finally, digenic variants in FGFR1 and KLB have been reported in a case study involving a 12-year-old female who showed features of IMPA, including acanthosis nigrans, hirsutism, acromegaly, and highly elevated insulin levels (23). To determine the etiology of these symptoms, the proband and her family members underwent exome sequencing, which identified 1108 potential deleterious variants. The list of deleterious variants was narrowed down based on gene set enrichment analysis of pathways relevant to insulin and IGF1 signaling, from which FGFR1 (Val102Ile) and KLB (Ser9Tyr) were selected as potential candidates. Functional analysis of the FGFR1 Val102Ile and KLB Ser9Tyr variants in L6 myoblasts showed strongly reduced FGF21-stimulated ERK phosphorylation, while FGF2-stimulated ERK phosphorylation was intact (23). How the Ser9Tyr missense variant affects KLB protein function is still obscure. As Ser9Tyr maps to the signal peptide of the protein, KLB localization may be disturbed. Thus, additional functional studies are needed to address the effect of Ser9Tyr on other aspects of the KLB protein, such as thermal stability, cell surface expression, or FGFR1 binding. In addition, a precise disease mechanism explaining how digenic variants in FGFR1 and KLB cause IMPA is still lacking.

The discrepancy between observed and expected numbers of LoF or missense variants in the KLB gene and the absence of homozygous LoF carriers strongly indicate that this gene is protected against deleterious mutations. In addition, given that most of the KLB missense variants are not found in a homozygous state, the genetic contribution of KLB to disease will be mainly through heterozygous or oligogenic inheritance models. A potential pathogenic role of heterozygous KLB mutations is supported by various phenotypes displayed by heterozygous Klb-KO mice, including disturbed estrous cycle, blunted LH surge at the estrus stage, reduced pregnancy rate, reduced adiposity, and altered regulation of thermogenic gene expression (22, 34). However, more extensive phenotypic characterization of heterozygous Klb-KO mice or human cell systems is needed to address the full impact of KLB gene dosage. In addition, the generation of heterozygous Fgfr/Klb LoF mice could provide more insight into the potential deleterious effect of digenic FGFR/KLB variants. Moreover, due to the conflicting functional consequences of some KLB variants, the use of different functional assays, and the fact that the potential pathogenicity of the currently identified KLB missense variants is not uniformly predicted by several widely used gene variants effect prediction tools (Table 2), further studies addressing the functional consequence of KLB variants should incorporate previously identified variants and additional controls as recommended by The clinical Genome Resource Sequence Variant Interpretation Working group (35).

TABLE 2

Table 2 Prediction of KLB variant pathogenicity through various gene variant interpretation tools.

Identifying phenotypes that are modulated by KLB gives a deeper insight into human KLB biology. Some of these phenotypes may also be considered in clinical trials examining the safety and efficacy of KLB-targeting drugs. For example, the association of KLB variants with colonic transit may explain why the administration of KLB-targeting drugs is associated with gastrointestinal side effects. Whether these drugs also modulate other physiological systems potentially modulated by KLB, such as reproduction and alcohol intake, remains to be established. Furthermore, by altering FGF binding, specific KLB variants may also explain differences in drug response between individual patients.

2.2 Regulation of KLB expression

Since FGF19/FGF21 activity depends on the presence of KLB, changes in KLB expression may alter the function of endogenous FGF19/FGF21 or the efficacy of FGF19/21-mimetics. Therefore, factors that change KLB mRNA expression or protein levels have been studied in multiple organisms and tissues (Table 3; Figure 1). Species in which KLB expression has been studied include mice, pigs, seal elephants, non-human primates, and humans. Tissues that were studied primarily included those expressing high levels of KLB, such as adipose tissue, pancreas, and liver. In most of these tissues, pathophysiological factors appear to reduce KLB mRNA expression or protein levels. In contrast, two studies reported an obesity-driven increase in KLB expression in the liver (42, 44). Unfortunately, not all studies measured mRNA and protein levels or performed extensive antibody validation. Pathophysiological factors that alter KLB expression can be grouped into three categories: obesity, fasting, and inflammation. As both obesity and fasting can also affect inflammation (50, 51), inflammatory and cellular stress pathways appear to play a key role in regulating KLB expression. Direct support for this idea comes from several studies that evaluated the effects of inflammatory- and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress on KLB expression in in vitro or in vivo models.

TABLE 3

Table 3 Overview of studies reporting differential KLB mRNA expression or KLB protein levels.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1 Pathophysiological factors that influence KLB expression in liver, adipose tissue, and pancreas.

Based on the idea that obesity is associated with a chronic pro-inflammatory state, Diaz-Delfin et al. analyzed the effect of inflammatory stimuli on the KLB/FGFR1 pathway in mouse 3T3-L1 adipocytes and showed that TNFα repressed Klb mRNA and protein expression (39). In addition, they demonstrated that the deletion of JNK1, which functions as a sensor of inflammatory status and cellular stress, increased Klb expression in WAT of mice (39). In hepatocytes, KLB expression appears less sensitive to TNFα or IL-6 stimulation (43, 47). Instead, treatment of the hepatoma cell lines Huh-7 and HepG2 or mouse liver with IL-1β strongly repressed KLB expression (43). IL-1β appears to regulate KLB expression at the transcriptional levels as the effect was blocked by actinomycin, an inhibitor of gene transcription, but not by cycloheximide, an inhibitor of protein synthesis (43). Moreover, IL-1β-driven repression of KLB was primarily mediated through the JNK and NF-κB pathways (43, 47).

Several studies have reported that ER stress modulates KLB expression. Thapsigargin, an activator of ER stress and stimulator of pro-inflammatory signals, strongly reduced Klb expression in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (39). In contrast, in hepatocytes, the ER stressors thapsigargin and tunicamycin increased KLB expression (42). Furthermore, the upregulation of KLB by tunicamycin was blocked after genetic inhibition of activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4), a transcription factor involved in the unfolded protein response (UPR) (42). These studies suggest that inflammatory stimuli and cellular stressors affect KLB expression in adipocytes and hepatocytes. A role for cellular stress in the regulation of KLB expression was also supported by the finding that treatment with high glucose (28 mmol/L) repressed Klb expression and FGF21 signaling in islets obtained from healthy mice (40). Thus, even though the transcriptional regulation of KLB is sensitive to cellular stress, the directionality of this appears to be controlled in a stimulus- and cell type-specific manner.

In addition to inflammation and cellular stress, several members of the nuclear receptor family, including Rev-erbα, BA-sensing transcription factor farnesoid X receptor (FXR), and the lipid sensor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), have been identified as regulators of KLB expression in hepatocytes, adipocytes, and pancreatic islets. The role of Rev-erbα in controlling KLB expression was revealed after transcriptome analysis of Rev-erba-KO mice, showing that KLB mRNA and protein levels were strongly induced in epididymal WAT (eWAT) and inguinal WAT (iWAT) but not in liver, hypothalamus, and brown adipose tissue (BAT) (52). Immunoprecipitation followed by Chip-seq analysis revealed direct binding of Rev-erbα within the first intron of the Klb locus, showing that Klb is a direct target gene of Rev-erbα. PPARγ was similarly found to be a transcriptional regulator of KLB as it can bind the Rev-erbα binding sites in the Klb locus in eWAT and 3T3-L1 cells, and siRNA-mediated silencing of PPARγ in 3T3-L1 cells dramatically reduced Klb mRNA expression (52). Also, the PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone robustly stimulates KLB expression in adipose tissue, suggesting that PPARγ activation may enhance FGF21 sensitivity (39, 53). In addition, rosiglitazone counteracted the TNFα-, high-fat diet-, and high glucose-driven reduction in KLB expression in adipocytes, WAT, and pancreatic islets, respectively (39, 40). The third nuclear receptor found to regulate KLB expression was FXR, after previous studies demonstrated FXR binding peaks at the Klb locus in mouse liver (54). Additional studies revealed that the FXR agonist GW4064 stimulated FXR binding and RNA polymerase II occupancy at the Klb gene in mouse livers, consequently leading to increased KLB mRNA and protein levels. Conversely, in the livers of FXR KO mice, Klb mRNA and protein levels were decreased (55). Therefore, FXR protects the liver against high BA levels by inducing Klb expression, ultimately lowering Cyp7a1 expression and BA synthesis.

Finally, regulation of KLB by small noncoding RNAs has also been demonstrated (38, 56). The 3’UTR of mouse and human KLB mRNA contains sequences that are partially complementary to miR-34a, the most highly upregulated microRNA (miRNA) in the liver of obese mice and patients with NAFLD or T2D (57, 58). Downregulation of miR-341 was shown to increase Klb expression in mouse Hepa1c1c7 cells, while miR-34a overexpression decreased KLB levels in Hepa1c1c7 cells and mouse liver (38). In addition, direct binding of miR-34a to the 3’UTR of KLB was demonstrated. Normalization of miR-34a by antisense inhibition restored Klb levels in the liver of mice fed a HFD, which are typically characterized by reduced Klb expression (38, 56).

Although multiple factors that regulate KLB transcription have been identified, the functional consequences of altered KLB expression for FGF19/FGF21 activity remain controversial. Reduced KLB expression has been suggested to play a role in a concept called FGF21 resistance, a pathophysiological state in rodents and humans with obesity associated with increased plasma FGF21 levels, reduced KLB/FGFR expression, or a reduced response to exogenously administered FGF21 (46, 59–61). The functional implications of reduced KLB expression can be observed in heterozygous Klb mice, which show a 50% reduction in KLB protein levels, and display a variety of phenotypic changes, such as an altered LH surge, reduced adiposity, and altered thermogenesis (22, 34). Moreover, conditions that reduce KLB expression, including a loss of FXR, overexpression of miR34-a, or siRNA-mediated KLB downregulation, are associated with blunted FGF19 activity in hepatocytes (38, 55). Conversely, conditions that increase KLB expression, such as loss of Rev-erbα and overexpression of KLB in hepatocytes, enhanced FGF21-stimulated transcriptional activity in WAT and restored FGF19 activity in FXR-deficient hepatocytes, respectively (52, 55). Similarly, transgenic overexpression of Klb in WAT of mice was associated with enhanced sensitivity to both endogenous and exogenous FGF21 (61). In contrast to these reports, Hale et al. showed that although Klb expression was strongly decreased in ob/ob and DIO mice, the in vivo metabolic effects of exogenous FGF21 were largely preserved (37). In addition, Markan et al. demonstrated that transgenic overexpression of Klb in WAT of mice did not affect exogenous FGF21 sensitivity (46). Differences between mouse models can potentially explain the conflicting findings between these studies. Samms et al. used the aP2 promotor to overexpress KLB in adipose tissue, which is also active in the brain, while Markan et al. used the adiponectin promotor, which is more specific for adipose tissue (46, 62). Therefore, some tissues may be more sensitive to altered KLB expression than others. Furthermore, the use of different functional readouts for measuring FGF19/FGF21 activity (e.g., ERK phosphorylation, FGF target gene expression, or metabolic effects) may have further contributed to discrepancies between these studies. Thus, while the transcription of the KLB gene appears to be sensitive to a wide range of pathophysiological factors, the consequences of altered KLB expression for endogenous or exogenous FGF19/FGF21 activity remain incompletely understood.

2.3 KLB protein structure

To obtain a better molecular understanding of the role of KLB in FGF19 and FGF21 signaling, structures of the free and ligand-bound extracellular region of human KLB protein were characterized using X-ray crystallography (63, 64). The KLB protein comprises 1044 amino acids and has a molecular weight of 120 kDa. The tertiary protein structure contains two tandem glycoside hydrolase-like domains, designated as D1 (or KL1, amino acid residues 53-507) and D2 (or KL2, amino acid residues 521-968) (63). Both D1 and D2 show substantial structural similarity to the human cytosolic B-glucosidase enzyme, demonstrating the evolutionary relationship of KLB to the glycoside hydrolase family-1 (GH1) enzymes. GH1 enzymes catalyze the hydrolysis of glycosidic bonds in carbohydrate molecules through two conserved glutamate residues in their active sites. In both D1 and D2 of KLB, one of these two conserved glutamate residues is replaced, suggesting that the glycoside hydrolase-like domains in KLB are not catalytically active (63). Another feature of KLB is a signal sequence (amino acid residue 1-53), of which the function is yet unknown.

Structural analysis of KLB bound to the C-terminal tail of FGF21 revealed the involvement of Pro186-Ser209 from FGF21 to an elongated interface spanning D1 and D2 of KLB. The binding of FGF21 to KLB did not appear to induce any conformational change in D1 or D2. In addition, two distinct binding sites in KLB interacting with two different regions of FGF21 were identified. The first site in D1 interacts with Pro186-Val197 of FGF21 largely through hydrophobic interactions. Site 2 in D2, which resembles the substrate-binding pocket normally occupied by glycosides in active GH-1 enzymes, interacted with residues 200-209 of FGF21. Interactions between the C-terminal part of the FGF21 molecule and the two KLB binding sides were validated by analyzing the functional consequences of a range of FGF21 and KLB variants in ligand-binding and cell stimulation experiments. These experiments showed that residues D192, P193, S204, S206, and Y207 in FGF21 could bind to KLB. In addition, mutations of relevant residues in D1 (V392, T431, and M435) and D2 (Y643, H646, E693, R696, R829, and R845) of KLB reduced FGF19- and FGF21-stimulated FGFR1 tyrosine phosphorylation (63, 64). Interestingly, some of these mutations also affected FGFR1 activation by FGF1 (63), raising the possibility that KLB shows some promiscuity towards other FGF members. Alternatively, KLB may also regulate FGFR signaling independent of its ligand-binding function, as suggested by its ability to control FGFR4 stability (65).

The structural analysis of ligand-bound KLB obtained with X-ray crystallography was replicated in another study using hydrogen deuterium exchange coupled to mass spectrometry (HDX-MS), which measures isotopic hydrogen exchange in protein backbone amides (66). As amides in the ligand-binding interface are protected from isotopic hydrogen exchange, this method allows for the sensitive determination of protein-protein interactions. HDX-MS revealed that the binding of FGF19 or FGF21 did not significantly alter the overall KLB structure, which is in line with structural data obtained with X-ray crystallography. Similarly, peptide regions in KLB involved in FGF19 and FGF21 binding mapped mainly to the D1 and D2 domains. Scanning mutagenesis followed by an FGF21 binding assay was used to assess these interactions in more detail, revealing that mutating residues Y434, M435, Y753, D852, and S858 strongly reduced FGF21 binding. These amino acids fall within the two FGF21-binding sites identified in KLB by X-ray crystallography. Using a similar approach, KLB bindings sites in FGF21 were also determined, revealing that residues 183-198 and 204-209 were the most strongly protected against isotopic hydrogen exchange, indicating that these two regions constitute the primary bindings site for KLB. These regions map to the C-terminus of FGF21 and overlap with regions previously identified using X-ray crystallography. Scanning mutagenesis followed by a KLB binding assay and Elk-1 luciferase reporter activity identified specific FGF21 residues involved in KLB binding, including D192, P193, L194, M196, and four residues near the distal part of the C-terminus (S204, P205, S206, and Y207). Similar to FGF21, two stretches of highly conserved amino acids in FGF19 (D198, P199, F200, L202, and four residues near the distal part of the C-terminus, including S211, P212, S213, and F214) strongly modulate KLB binding (66).

Based on these structural analyses of ligand-bound human KLB, a model has been proposed in which KLB primarily functions as a high-affinity receptor for FGF19 and FGF21 by binding to two conserved peptide sequences in their C-terminal tails. The binding of the globular core of FGF19 or FGF21 to FGFR then leads to the formation of the FGF-FGFR-KLB ternary complex and downstream tyrosine kinase activity. In addition, the strong structural similarity of D1 and D2 in KLB to glycoside hydrolases suggests that these enzymes have evolved to serve as a high-affinity cell surface receptor for endocrine FGFs. Finally, although the structure of the mouse KLB protein has not yet been elucidated experimentally, Alphafold-based in silico predictions show that the global structures of the mouse and human KLB proteins are highly similar despite their relatively low sequence homology (79%) (Figure 2) (67).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2 Comparison of Alphafold-based in silico predictions of the human and mouse KLB protein structures (67). Colors reflect model confidence (dark blue: very high (pLDDT >90); light blue: confident (90 < pLDDT > 70); yellow: low (70 > pLDDT > 50); orange: very low (pLDDT < 50). D1: domain 1 (residues 53-507); D2: domain 2 (residues 521-968); SP: signal peptide; TM: transmembrane region.

2.4 Tissue distribution and subcellular localization of KLB

While FGFRs are ubiquitously expressed in the body, KLB is expressed more selectively, acting as the limiting factor determining in which tissues FGF15/19 and FGF21 are functionally active (61, 68). Although adipose tissue, liver, and pancreas are the central tissues known to express KLB, recent technological advancements, such as RNAscope in situ hybridization, droplet digital PCR, and single-cell RNA sequencing, have also identified KLB expression in other organs and cell types (69).

Initial efforts to determine Klb tissue distribution in embryonic and adult mice revealed that Klb transcripts became detectable from day 11 of gestation and expression levels increased further during development. Between gestational ages 10.5 and 19.5, Klb transcripts were mainly detected in the yolk sac, liver, gut epithelium, acinar cells of the pancreas, cervical BAT, and WAT. In adult mice, the highest Klb expression was detected in the liver and pancreas (5). Based on these initial observations, Klb transcripts appear to be expressed primarily in organs that control metabolic processes. Fon Tacer et al. established a comprehensive expression atlas of the FGF systems in adult mice using quantitative PCR in 39 different mouse tissues (70). In this study, the highest Klb expression was found in BAT, WAT, liver, gallbladder, colon, and pancreas, which is in line with previous studies and consistent with the well-known effects of FGF15/19 and FGF21 in these organs (70–72). In addition, Klb expression levels could also be detected in several other tissues, including the eye, adrenal gland, thyroid gland, stomach, small intestine, thymus, ovaries, testes, aorta, muscle, and skin, implying a potential role of KLB in many other homeostatic systems as well. For example, co-expression of Klb and Fgfr4 in the adrenal tissue and the aorta suggests their involvement in FGF15/19- or FGF21-mediated effects on steroidogenesis and blood vessel physiology, respectively. In line with this, FGF21-mediated protective metabolic effects on the heart have been reported (73–77). However, it is unknown whether these effects are dependent or independent of KLB. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on mRNA expression demonstrated that Klb is primarily enriched in the gastrointestinal (GI) and reproductive system and most strongly co-expressed with Fgfr4 (65).

Although Klb is not ubiquitously expressed in the rodent central nervous system (CNS), various observations suggest that FGF21 acts centrally (70). Using anatomically guided laser-capture microdissection followed by quantitative PCR, Klb expression was detected in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), hippocampus, and several midbrain and hindbrain nuclei (78). Expression of Klb in these brain regions has been shown to mediate many of the endogenous and pharmacological effects of FGF21, such as the suppression of physical activity, modulation of circadian behaviour, and the activation of sympathetic nerve activity (79). Through automated RNAscope in situ hybridization and droplet digital PCR technology, Hultman et al. were able to define central Klb expression in mice further. Besides the SCN, Klb transcripts were also found in the reticular thalamus, the medial vestibular nucleus and the medial trigeminal neurons of the midbrain, and the hypoglossal nucleus of the hindbrain (69). A more recent study also identified Klb expression in hypothalamic neurons and amygdalar nuclei (80).

KLB mRNA expression in human tissues is easily accessible and comparable due to many publicly available databases. The consensus dataset of the Human Protein Atlas (HPA), which reports expression levels of 55 human tissues by combining HPA and GTEx transcriptomics datasets, indicates that KLB is predominantly present in adipose tissue, liver, and pancreas (Figure 3). Using 1 nTPM as a cut-off for detection, KLB transcripts can also be detected in breast tissue, testis, lung, and stomach (81). In contrast to rodents, KLB does not appear to be expressed in the human brain. Human studies using automated RNAscope in situ hybridization and droplet digital PCR technology revealed that KLB-positive cells were only scarcely found in the human mid- and hindbrain, showing a discrepancy in KLB expression between rodents and humans (69). Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed that KLB transcripts are enhanced in hepatocytes (liver), spermatocytes (testis), alveolar cells type 2 (lungs), enteroendocrine cells (colon), and glandular intestinal cells (small intestine and rectum) (82). The presence of KLB transcripts in these tissues and cell types suggests that it also has other functions beyond metabolic regulation.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3 Normalized bulk tissue (A) and single-cell (B) KLB mRNA expression data obtain from HPA (81, 82). 1.0 nTPM was used as a cut-off for detection.

Although KLB is traditionally viewed as an FGF coreceptor located in the plasma membrane, relatively few studies have addressed its subcellular localization. Zweers et al. performed immunohistochemistry on sections of the gall bladder, small intestine, colon, and liver obtained from patients undergoing abdominal surgery. In line with publicly available transcriptomic datasets, KLB and FGFR4 showed the highest expression in the liver. Within the cell, KLB was detected in the cytoplasm and the plasma membrane (71, 83). While KLB was mainly present in the cytoplasm, a specific granular staining pattern was observed for FGFR4 in the gall bladder, which was attributed to the apical plasma membrane and ER or Golgi structures, indicating a possible interaction of KLB with the FGFR4 in the ER or Golgi. In line with this observation, Triantis et al. reported that KLB is resident in the ER (65). Computational protein analysis using the PSORTII interface predicted a 45% chance of KLB localization in the ER compared to a 33% chance for Golgi and a 22% chance for the plasma membrane. Additional immunofluorescence studies in kidney fibroblast-like COS-7 cells transfected with KLB demonstrated that KLB colocalized with the pEGFP-ER marker but not with the pEYFP-Golgi marker (65). Interestingly, this study also showed that KLB engaged in the glycosylation of FGFR4 in the ER. Based on these observations, KLB was suggested to interact with the inactive core glycoform of FGFR4 and direct it toward the proteasome. As a result, the active terminal glycoform reaches the plasma membrane and can be activated by FGF19 (65). These results fuel the hypothesis that KLB could be involved in processing receptor complex molecules or proteasomal degradation aside from its conventional role as a coreceptor (65). Even though Triantis et al. detected the presence and interaction of KLB with FGFR4 in the ER, it remains obscure whether KLB is directly involved in proteasomal degradation and, if so, which mechanism of proteasomal degradation removes inactive components (65). Further studies are required to establish the exact subcellular location of KLB within the cell and its impact on the function of other organelles.

3 Functions of KLB

3.1 Liver and gallbladder

The first and best-described function of KLB concerns its role in the physiologic regulation of BA synthesis (84). Postprandial release of bile acids activates FXR in the ileal enterocytes, leading to the expression and secretion of FGF15/19. Parallel to intestinal FXR activation, bile acids also activate hepatic FXR, which increases KLB expression in hepatocytes (55). Subsequently, secreted FGF15/19 induces KLB/FGFR4 complex formation in the liver, resulting in the transcriptional repression of CYP7A1 (85). As CYP7A1 encodes the rate-limiting enzyme in BA synthesis, FXR-mediated induction of ileal FGF15/19 and hepatic KLB controls the negative feedback regulation of BA synthesis (55, 86, 87). Evidence for the role of KLB in BA metabolism was provided by Klb-deficient mice, which were characterized by increased Cyp7a1 expression, strongly elevated synthesis and excretion of bile acids, and an altered BA composition (84, 85, 88). Hepatocyte-specific transgenic overexpression of KLB in Klb-deficient mice restored Cyp7a1 expression, BA pool size, and BA excretion (88). Together, these findings identified KLB as a suppressor of BA synthesis through negative regulation of CYP7A1 (85, 86, 89, 90). In humans, targeting KLB using FGF19-mimetics strongly reduced serum 7a-hydroxy-4-choleston-3-one (C4) levels, a marker of hepatic CYP7A1 activity, showing functional conservation of KLB in mice and humans (91). While suppression of BA synthesis plays a central role in the protective effects of FGF19-mimetics, this is less clear for FGF21-mimetics.

Since bile acids can regulate lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, it is no surprise that KLB is also involved in these processes. Klb deficiency in mice causes dysregulated lipid homeostasis, characterized by lower plasma triglycerides and a tendency towards lower plasma cholesterol, which was reversed upon hepatocyte-specific restoration of KLB (85, 88). Also, mice deficient in Klb show an altered carbohydrate metabolism, as reflected by decreased hepatic glycogen levels and increased hepatic glucokinase expression (85). As both processes are pivotal in glycolysis, KLB is suggested to play a role in glucose turnover. As a result of the altered hepatic metabolism, Klb-deficient mice develop a pathological phenotype characterized by the presence of hepatic lipid accumulation, increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and macrophage markers, and increased plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels (85).

Aside from its role in the liver, KLB also appears to regulate gallbladder function. Klb-deficient mice fed a lithogenic diet had a smaller gallbladder and showed increased secretion of BA into bile, revealing a protective effect of KLB against gallstone formation (70, 85, 90). Reasons suggested for this protective effect are enhanced gallbladder motility or a more hydrophilic and frequent BA pool cycling (90). Interestingly, in humans, the highest expression of FGF19 is observed in epithelial cells of the gallbladder, which is up to 400-fold higher than in the ileum (71, 92). Also, FGF19 protein levels in bile collected from the gallbladder are roughly ten times higher than FGF19 levels in circulation (21.9 vs. 0.22 ng/mL), suggesting active secretion of FGF19 into bile (71). As KLB is expressed on the apical side of epithelial cells of the gallbladder, it may, in combination with FGF19, modulate human gallbladder function in an autocrine or paracrine fashion (71). It is unknown whether pharmacologically administered KLB-targeting drugs can reach the epithelial cells lining the gallbladder lumen and impact their function.

3.2 Adipose tissue

The identification of FGF21 as a hormone that stimulates glucose uptake in adipocytes and the strong increase of KLB during adipocyte differentiation suggested that adipose tissue is a central player in the metabolic effects of FGF21 (93). Initially, studies that examined the role of adipose tissue in the metabolic effects of FGF21 were performed in mice with aP2-Cre promotor-driven KLB deletion. However, as this promoter is also active in non-adipose tissue, such as the CNS, these studies did not provide definitive proof that adipose is a direct target organ for FGF21 (68, 94). Later, indirect evidence for the role of adipose tissue in controlling the metabolic effect of FGF21 was provided by studies showing that FGF21 administration stimulates the expression and secretion of adiponectin, an insulin-sensitizing hormone that is specifically produced by the adipose tissue (95, 96). In these studies, the ability of FGF21 to lower blood glucose levels and improve insulin sensitivity in diet-induced obesity (DIO) mice was dependent on adiponectin secretion (96) since an adipose-specific deficiency of Klb or adiponectin in these mice eliminated the FGF21-mediated metabolic improvements (84, 95–97). Direct evidence of the role of adipose tissue in FGF21 activity was provided in lipodystrophic mice, which are refractory to the beneficial metabolic effects of FGF21 (98). Transplantation of healthy WAT into lipodystrophic mice could completely restore FGF21 activity (46). Additional evidence was obtained from mice with an adiponectin-Cre promotor-driven deletion of Klb, which is selective for the adipose tissue (97). This study showed that the acute insulin-sensitizing effects of FGF21 are driven by targeting KLB in adipose tissue, whereas most other metabolic effects originate from targeting central KLB. Earlier findings showing that FGF21-mediated metabolic effects are dependent on adiponectin could not be replicated (97). Interestingly, FGF21 is also able to target the adipose tissue independently of KLB, even though the underlying mechanism remains incompletely understood (89). Although the role of KLB expression in adipose tissue and downstream adiponectin secretion in the effects of FGF21 remain controversial, FGF21-based drugs consistently increase plasma adiponectin levels in humans and non-human primates (99), indicating that FGF21 also targets the adipose tissue in these species.

While FGF15/19 binds preferentially to FGFR4, it can also act through FGFR1c that is predominantly present in the white adipose tissue (100). Although FGF19 is able to increase EGR1 transcriptional activity in the adipose tissue in vivo, the metabolic effects of FGF19 do not appear to involve KLB expression (84, 89). Recently, an association was found between circulating FGF19 levels and UCP1 expression in subcutaneous white adipose tissue of obese individuals (101). This association was investigated further using mice overexpressing FGF15, revealing the induction of browning as shown by presence of beige cells and increased UCP1 protein levels. Similarly, FGF19 was found to promote energy expenditure in BAT through upregulation of PGC-1α and UCP1 expression (102). In the absence of FGF15, mice displayed impaired browning and reduced BAT activity. Therefore, FGF15/19 could potentially play a role in adipose tissue plasticity. Similar results were found for FGF21, showing that these endocrine FGFs are involved in the thermogenic adaptation to cold in the WAT and BAT (103). However, further research needs to establish whether these effects occur dependently or independently of KLB.

3.3 Brain

While KLB is mainly expressed in peripheral metabolic tissues like the liver, adipose, and pancreas, central Klb expression in rodents was anticipated since FGF21 could cross the blood-brain barrier and intracerebroventricular injection of FGF21 increased metabolic rate and insulin sensitivity in rats (78, 104, 105). Indeed, Klb transcripts were detected in the SCN of the hypothalamus, the area postrema, the nucleus of the solitary tract, and the dorsal vagal complex (30, 68, 80). Deletion of Klb in the hypothalamus and hindbrain revealed that FGF21 acts centrally to increase plasma levels of ketone bodies and glucocorticoids, suppress growth, and modulate circadian behavior (78, 106). In addition, FGF21 and KLB have been identified as critical players in the neuroendocrine control of female reproduction, in which FGF21 acts as a starvation signal to reduce female fertility (106). Overexpression of FGF21 affects female reproduction by inducing infertility due to delayed onset of puberty, a lower incidence of ovulation, and diminished LH levels. Mechanistically, FGF21 acts on the SCN to suppress vasopressin-kisspeptin signaling and inhibit LH release, revealing a neuroendocrine axis that controls female reproduction (106). A role for FGF21 and KLB in controlling reproduction is also supported by the observation that Klb-KO mice have impaired estrous cycles, diminished LH levels, and impaired fertility (22, 107). In addition, it has been shown that the metabolic adaptations that follow dietary protein restriction, including altered macronutrient preference, energy expenditure, growth, and insulin sensitivity, are driven by central FGF21/KLB signaling (108). In an attempt to identify the neural substrates through which FGF21 regulates metabolic adaptations in response to protein restriction, Flippo et al. (2020) found that protein restriction-driven protection against weight gain was specifically controlled by KLB in glutaminergic neurons, and not by KLB in GABAergic neurons (109). In contrast, protein restriction-driven enhancement of insulin sensitivity was independent of glutamatergic KLB signaling (108, 109). In addition, this study showed that the effect of FGF21 on protein preference is secondary to the suppression of simple sugar consumption (109). Furthermore, FGF21 is able to suppress alcohol consumption in rodents and non-human primates by targeting KLB-expressing neurons in the basolateral amygdala and counteract alcohol intoxication by activating noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus (32, 110). Finally, it is becoming increasingly apparent that many beneficial metabolic effects of recombinant FGF19/FGF21 and FGFR1/KLB-targeting antibodies, such as increased energy expenditure, body weight loss, and secondary effects on glucose levels, are driven by targeting KLB in the brain. Targeting central KLB leads to subsequent activation of neuronal pathways that enhance sympathetic nervous activity in the BAT (79, 84). The ability of FGF21 to increase energy expenditure and promote weight loss appears to be controlled specifically by KLB-expressing glutamatergic neurons, but also involves complex interactions with central leptin signaling (111). In contrast, the acute insulin-sensitizing effects of FGF21 are retained in mice with KLB-deficient glutamatergic neurons (111). However, as KLB transcripts are not clearly detected in the adult human brain, it remains unclear if FGF19/FGF21 can act centrally in humans.

3.4 Pancreas

KLB has been shown to be involved in both the exocrine and endocrine functions of the pancreas (112). The exocrine pancreas is made up of ductal structures and acinar cells that produce and secrete digestive enzymes. As pancreatic acinar cells synthesize and secrete considerable amounts of proteins, their ability to maintain proteostasis to prevent misfolding and ER stress is vital. A potential role for KLB in pancreatic acinar cells was anticipated as they have been shown to express FGF21 in response to feeding or ER stress (92, 112). Indeed, studies using FGF21 treatment confirmed that FGF21 acts directly on pancreatic acinar cells to stimulate digestive enzyme secretion and pancreatic juice flow, as these effects were lost upon the knock-out of Klb (112). By stimulating digestive enzyme secretion, FGF21/KLB appear to reduce ER stress and pancreatic proteotoxicity (112). Whether KLB also modulates pancreatic acinar cell function in humans is currently unclear. However, a direct comparison of the different pancreatic cell types in humans shows that KLB is most highly expressed in exocrine cells (92).

Although KLB expression is lower in the endocrine pancreas compared to the exocrine pancreas, FGF21-dependent and -independent effects on islet function have been elucidated. The ability of FGF21 to suppress glucagon secretion from primary rat islets provided the first indication that KLB can affect islet function (113). In follow-up studies, FGF21 increased insulin content and secretion from primary islets of diabetic rodents, and increased β-cell mass and function (114, 115). FGF21 also protects β-cells from glucolipotoxicity and apoptosis by activating ERK and Akt signaling (115). While FGF21 could increase the insulin content and number of islets, there was no effect of FGF21 on islet cell proliferation. In contrast to these in vitro studies, long-term administration of FGF21 in db/db mice did not affect β-cell function and mass. KLB was also found to affect pancreatic homeostasis independently of FGF21. Geng et al. demonstrated that KLB could fine-tune glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) via modulation of glycolysis in pancreatic β-cells independently of FGF21 (116). A β-cell-specific deficiency of KLB in mice resulted in impaired GSIS and glycolytic flux in islets, which could recover to normal upon restoration of KLB expression. Mechanistically, KLB was shown to interact with and stabilize cytokine receptor unit GP130 by preventing its degradation, resulting in STAT3-HIF1a signaling, which consequently activates glycolytic genes and promotes GSIS (116). Based on these observations, KLB was suggested as a protective factor against β-cell dysfunction and T2D development.

3.5 Intestine

In intestinal epithelial cells, KLB has been shown to positively regulate tight junction plasticity and maintain intestinal barrier integrity (117). This function was revealed when Klb overexpression was found to protect mice from hepatic steatosis and inflammation. KLB could maintain the intestinal epithelial barrier by forming tight junction complexes in enterocytes and preventing the endocytic degradation of these complexes (117). Ethanol was found to reduce KLB expression in enterocytes, thereby contributing to a disrupted intestinal barrier and leakage of unfavourable substances into the bloodstream. Upregulation of KLB in enterocytes was able to protect and restore this alcohol-induced dysfunctional intestinal barrier, supporting the hypothesis that KLB is essential for supporting intestinal barrier integrity (117). Besides regulating barrier integrity, a complex of KLB with FGF15/19 can regulate BA circulation through the apical sodium-BA transporter (ASBT) in the ileum. Intraperitoneal administration of FGF19 decreased ASBT protein in the ileum, whereas silencing of FGF15 or KLB in mice increased ASBT activity (72). In this way, KLB appears to be involved in regulating BA resorption in the intestine (72).

While FGF19 is mostly associated with BA metabolism in the liver and FGF21 with glucose and lipid metabolism in the adipose tissue, these endocrine factors also have overlapping actions. As such, FGF21 is able to regulate intestinal structure and function as well. Studies in mice have demonstrated that FGF21 treatment is able to decrease BA pool size, change gut microbiome composition and restore intestinal structure, thereby reducing NAFLD (118, 119). A recent study revealed that in neonatal FGF21-KO mice fed by FGF21-KO and WT lactating dams FGF21 in breast milk is able to induce intestinal hormones and digestive enzymes, lactase activity, and lactose absorption. These effects presumably act through KLB, which is highly expressed in the small intestine of neonates but not adults. Thereby, FGF21 was found to play a major role in the maturation and shaping of intestine development, possibly through KLB (120). However, the relevance of KLB in adults regarding intestinal function remains to be further investigated. An overview of KLB functionality is provided in Figure 4.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4 Overview of KLB functionality in the brain, liver, pancreas, intestine, and adipose tissue.

4 KLB-targeting drugs in clinical studies

Pharmacological targeting of the FGFR-KLB system dramatically improves metabolic disturbances in rodent models of obesity, T2D, and NAFLD, observations that paved the way for more advanced drug development. Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies have designed and tested a multitude of FGF19- and FGF21-mimetics, recognizing KLB as a promising drug target for treating various metabolic diseases in humans. Although pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of these drugs differ substantially, they all can target KLB. In this last section, we will highlight recent developments regarding the safety and efficacy of KLB-targeting drugs in clinical trials (Table 4). However, we recognize that the safety and efficacy of KLB-targeting drugs have also been extensively reviewed elsewhere (99, 133).

TABLE 4

Table 4 KLB targeting drugs in clinical studies.

4.1 FGF19 analogue NGM282

Pharmacological administration of FGF19 improves metabolic disorders such as T2D and NAFLD. NGM282 (also called M70 or Aldafermin) is an FGF19 mimetic designed to induce FGFR1c and FGFR4 signaling without activating pathways involved in hepatocellular proliferation (122). NGM282 retained full metabolic activity, and preclinical studies showed overall metabolic improvement in animal models of NASH, including amelioration of bile acid toxicity, decreased hepatic inflammation and fibrosis, a reduction in hepatic lipid content, and improvement of insulin sensitivity (122, 123). NGM282 entered clinical trials with promising initial results. Twelve weeks of NGM282 treatment diminished liver fat content (-67-74% in 3 mg groups), improved liver damage markers and histological features of NASH (-1.9 NAS score in 3 mg group) in NASH patients in two phase 2 clinical trials (134, 135).

Recently, another phase 2 clinical trial was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of more prolonged treatment (i.e., 24 weeks) with NGM282 in biopsy-proven NASH patients (121). Longer NGM282 treatment decreased plasma C4 levels, liver damage markers ALT and AST, and liver fibrosis biomarker Pro-C3 (121). Histological outcome measures also improved in NGM282-treated patients with improvements in fibrosis and NAFLD activity score (NAS)(62%), and NASH resolution (121). One of the safety concerns of NGM282 treatment is the increase in plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, which can be managed by using rosuvastatin (134, 136).

As NGM282 treatment results in a marked reduction of bile acid levels, other clinical trials have studied the effect of NGM282 in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), both chronic liver diseases concerning bile acid-induced liver injury. NGM282 treatment in these patients reduced bile acids, plasma C4 levels, and various liver damage and fibrosis markers (137, 138). Currently, clinical trials using NGM282 focus on patients with PBC and chronic diarrhea due to bile acid malabsorption (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02135536 and NCT05130047).

4.2 FGF21 analogues

Although FGF21 does not have mitogenic properties, the native protein is unsuitable for clinical use due to its poor pharmacokinetic properties. Therefore, several FGF21-based drugs with higher potency and pharmacokinetics were developed and tested in clinical trials. FGF21 analog LY2405319 (Lilly), the first to enter a phase 1 clinical trial, showed promising metabolic outcomes in preclinical studies in mice and monkeys on features of T2D (124, 139, 140). LY2405319 treatment of patients with obesity and T2DM for 28 days improved dyslipidemia, lowered body weight, reduced insulin levels, and increased adiponectin levels but did not result in the expected glucose-lowering effects (124). Another effort to make a long-lasting FGF21 mimetic resulted in PF-05231023 (Pfizer), which is in phase 1 clinical trial in obese patients with T2D, showing less improvement of dyslipidemia and lower body weight, but again did not lead to glucose lowering (31, 125). Furthermore, side effects included changes in bone turnover markers and blood pressure (125). Currently, no ongoing clinical trials are using LY2405319 and PF-05231023 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugated FGF21 variants were created to increase half-life and duration of action. Pegbelfermin (also called BMS-986036, Bristol-Myers Squibb) has made it to phase 2 clinical trials with promising results. Pegbelfermin treatment for 12 weeks improved dyslipidemia and insulin sensitivity, increased adiponectin levels, and decreased ALT, AST, and Pro-C3 levels in obese patients with T2D (126). Pegbelfermin treatment of patients with NASH was found to be well tolerated and resulted in a decrease in the hepatic fat fraction (5-7% in treated groups with 30% in >50% of patients) and improvement in liver stiffness and biomarkers of liver damage and fibrosis (128). Pegbelfermin entered the phase 2b FALCON studies (FALCON 1 and 2, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03486899 and NCT03486912), in which patients with NASH, characterized by stage 3 liver fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis, received Pegbelfermin treatment for 24 and 48 weeks, respectively (127). Currently, the FALCON studies have been completed, and the results remain to be published.

Another promising FGF21-based drug is AKR-001 (Efruxifermin, Akero Therapeutics), a long-acting Fc-FGF21 fusion protein with increased binding affinity to KLB (141). In phase 1 clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01856881) in patients with T2D, four weeks of AKR-001 treatment resulted in a reduced atherogenic lipid profile and improved insulin sensitivity with reduced plasma glucose, insulin, and HOMA-IR (129). In a phase, 2a clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03976401), 16-week AKR-001 treatment in NASH patients caused a reduction of the hepatic fat fraction (10.3% - 14.1%), NASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis, and reduction in enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) scores (130). Currently, AKR-001 is in phase 2b clinical trials for treating NASH in non-cirrhotic and compensated cirrhotic patients (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04767529 and NCT05039450).

In summary, clinical trials using FGF21 mimetics generated disappointing results on glycemic control, making it unlikely that FGF21 mimetics will serve as a stand-alone treatment for T2D. On the other hand, the benefits of FGF21 therapeutics include improvement of the atherogenic lipid profile, hepatic fat fraction, and markers of liver damage and fibrosis, making these compounds promising for treatment strategies in NAFLD and NASH patients.

4.3 Direct targeting of the FGFR1/KLB complex

About a decade ago, bi-specific anti-FGFR1/KLB antibodies became of interest as an alternative approach for FGF21 mimetics to avoid global FGFR activation and to specifically activate FGFR1 signaling in a KLB-dependent manner. mimAb1 was one of the first identified human monoclonal antibodies that activated the FGFR1c/KLB complex (142). Effects of mimAb1 were tested in obese cynomolgus monkeys on a four-week treatment, which resulted in weight loss, decreased fasting and fed plasma insulin levels, and improved insulin sensitivity (142). In addition, an FGFR1c/KLB bispecific Avimer fused to human serum albumin called C3201-HSE was generated, which also induced FGF21-like effects in obese cynomolgus monkeys, among which decreased plasma insulin and triglyceride levels (143). A more extensive metabolic study using FGFR1c/KLB antibodies was performed using bFKB1, another selective KLB-dependent FGFR1c agonist (144). As the bFKB1 epitope differs from the binding site for FGF21, it does not affect endogenous FGF21 signaling. Like FGF21 mimetics, bFKB1 induced weight loss, lowered plasma glucose levels and hepatic triglycerides, increased energy expenditure, and induced BAT thermogenesis in obese mice (144). Follow-up studies demonstrated that bFKB1 stimulates BAT thermogenesis in a Ucp1-independent manner in mice and may act via the nervous system, similar to FGF21 (145). The promising effects of this drug, renamed BFKB8488A (Genentech), led to further studies in nonhuman primates and humans. A single administration of BFKB8488A to obese cynomolgus monkeys led to dose-dependent weight loss, reducing fat mass and food intake (146). An attempt has been made to overcome the distance between the two arms of bispecific monoclonal antibodies by creating a biparatopic molecule that could better mimic natural ligands. Using this approach, two different epitopes can be targeted with both close and distant proximity between the two antigen-binding sites. The biparatopic molecule targeting the FGFR1c/KLB complex, called IgG-VH1+VH2, has shown FGF21-mimicking effects in vitro but has not yet been further investigated in preclinical studies (147).

4.4 BFKB8488A in clinical trials

BFKB8488A is one of the drugs targeting the FGFR1c/KLB complex that is currently in clinical trials. In the first-in-human clinical trial, a single subcutaneous injection of BFKB8488A to overweight or obese individuals was safe. BFKB8488A improved cardiometabolic parameters, such as a decrease in plasma triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, and fasting insulin, as well as reduced body weight and caloric intake (146).

Recently, the results of a phase 1b clinical trial using BFKB8488A (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03060538) in patients with T2D or NAFLD were published (131). The phase 1b clinical trial consisted of various dosing regimens (20-250 mg) and different dosing frequencies (weekly, every two weeks, and monthly) over 12 weeks to evaluate the safety and exploratory outcomes. The most common Grade 1 or 2 side effects of BFKB8488A treatment included gastrointestinal complications (43.8%), especially in the high-dose regimens (50%-100%), but no apparent loss of bone density (131). BFKB8488A treatment only resulted in slight weight loss in the high-exposure group (4.1%). While there were no apparent effects on insulin sensitivity markers, improvements were seen in plasma adiponectin, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in BFKB8488A-treated patients in an exposure-dependent manner (131). Hepatic damage markers, among which plasma ALT, AST, and Pro-C3 levels, decreased in the medium- and high-exposure groups (131). Interestingly, BFKB8488A treatment decreased the liver fat fraction in patients with NAFLD by -13.0% from baseline in low exposure, -34.5% in medium exposure, and -49% in the high exposure group (131). The improvement in liver injury and steatosis is likely an indirect effect of BFKB8488A through its actions on adipose tissue, such as suppression of lipolysis. Overall, BFKB8488A treatment improved cardiometabolic parameters and markedly reduced liver fat, which makes this drug especially interesting for patients with NAFLD and NASH. Currently, BFKB8488A is in Phase 2 clinical trials for the treatment of NASH, which is expected to be completed in early 2023 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NTC04171765).

4.5 MK-3655 in clinical trials

Another FGFR1c/KLB-targeting compound currently in clinical trials, with no research published yet, is MK-3655 (NGM313, Merck Sharp & Dohme). In a phase 1 clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03298465), one single administration of MK-3655 reduced fasting glucose levels and improved whole-body insulin sensitivity after 29 days in obese non-diabetic patients. After 36 days of treatment, liver fat content was reduced by >30% in 63% of patients receiving MK-3655, along with reductions in ALT, AST, plasma triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol (132). MK-3655 is currently tested for safety and efficacy in a phase 2 clinical trial in patients with pre-cirrhotic NASH (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NTC04583423). Patients will receive a dose of MK-3655 once every four weeks, and effects on NASH resolution as one of the primary outcome measures will be evaluated after 52 weeks with liver fat content, fibrosis scoring, and NAS scoring as secondary outcome measures.

5 Conclusion

Preclinical studies have dramatically increased our understanding of KLB function over the last two decades. Nevertheless, the absence of KLB homozygous LoF carriers in extensive sequencing studies limits our ability to fully understand this gene’s function in humans. Given the extreme rarity of KLB homozygous LoF carriers, the KLB gene appears vital for embryonic development. This also implies that the genetic contribution of KLB to disease is most likely through heterozygous or oligogenic inheritance models. In line with this view, several heterozygous missense variants in the KLB gene are associated with various phenotypes and diseases. However, the effect of these missense variants on KLB protein function is somewhat conflicting and requires further functional analysis. In addition, the relevance of genetic KLB variants regarding the efficacy of KLB-targeting drugs remains to be established. Related to this, various pathophysiological factors appear to decrease KLB expression, which may also impact the therapeutic activity of FGF-based drugs. Developing FGF analogs with higher KLB binding affinity may bypass these issues. The feasibility of this approach has recently been demonstrated by showing that the introduction of mutations in the C-terminal tail of FGF21 (R203W/L194F) caused a tenfold increase in KLB binding affinity (63).

Although human bulk tissue mRNA KLB transcriptome datasets may give the impression that KLB is primarily expressed in adipose, liver, and pancreas, more in-depth analyses show that KLB transcripts are also present in many other tissues such as breast tissue, testis, lung, stomach, and intestine. These findings indicate that KLB might have other functions besides its role in metabolic regulation. However, little is known about the function of KLB in these tissues and whether FGF-based drugs can target them. The expression of KLB in the stomach and intestine may provide a simple explanation for the gastrointestinal side effects that occur after treatment with FGF-based drugs. While these gastrointestinal side effects have also been attributed to central FGF effects, evidence for KLB expression in the human brain is scarce. Aside from having potentially broader physiological functions, evidence is increasing that KLB may be multifunctional at a molecular level. Next to its role as an obligatory high-affinity coreceptor for FGF19/FGF21, recent evidence indicates that KLB can also impact FGFR4 receptor stability, tight junction complex formation, and ubiquitin-dependent lysosomal degradation of GP130. As these functions appear to be independent of its coreceptor function, it is conceivable that KLB operates in other subcellular compartments, such as the ER.

The recognition of KLB as an exciting drug target for a variety of common metabolic diseases encouraged many pharmaceutical companies to develop a multitude of FGF19 and FGF21 analogs. Aside from FGF19- and FGF21-based drugs, FGFR1c/KLB-targeting antibodies have also been developed as an alternative to the FGF21-mimetics. By directly targeting this receptor complex, global FGFR activation can be avoided. Although the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of FGF19 analogs, FGF21 analogs, and FGFR1c/KLB-targeting antibodies differ substantially, they all can target KLB. Many of these analogs have already been explored in late-stage clinical trials and have thus been tested on many patients. Despite their different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, most analogs show surprisingly similar effects on disease parameters, indicating an overlapping mode of action. Thus far, clinical trials have generated disappointing results concerning improving glycemic control, making it unlikely that FGF19/FGF21 mimetics will serve as a stand-alone treatment for T2D. Nonetheless, even short-term treatment with FGF19/FGF21 mimetics or FGFR1c/KLB-targeting antibodies results in remarkable reductions of liver fat content and markers of liver damage and fibrosis. Consequently, KLB-targeting drugs are particularly interesting as a therapeutic strategy for patients with NAFLD. However, as evidenced in this review, the successful application of these drugs will strongly depend on continued efforts to improve our understanding of human FGFR/KLB biology.

Author contributions

AA, CV, JJ and DS contributed equally to this review. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

All figures in this manuscript were created with BioRender.com.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Kuro-o M. The klotho proteins in health and disease. Nat Rev Nephrol (2019) 15(1):27–44. doi: 10.1038/s41581-018-0078-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Kuro-o M, Matsumura Y, Aizawa H, Kawaguchi H, Suga T, Utsugi T, et al. Mutation of the mouse klotho gene leads to a syndrome resembling ageing. Nature (1997) 390:45–51. doi: 10.1038/36285

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Kurosu H, Ogawa Y, Miyoshi M, Yamamoto M, Nandi A, Rosenblatt KP, et al. Regulation of fibroblast growth factor-23 signaling by klotho. J Biol Chem (2006) 15(4):437–41. doi: 10.1097/01.mnh.0000232885.81142.83

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Stubbs J, Liu S, Quarles LD. Role of fibroblast growth factor 23 in phosphate homeostasis and pathogenesis of disordered mineral metabolism in chronic kidney disease. Semin Dial (2007) 20(4):302–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00308.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Ito S, Kinoshita S, Shiraishi N, Nakagawa S, Sekine S, Fujimori T, et al. Molecular cloning and expression analyses of mouse βklotho, which encodes a novel klotho family protein. Mech Dev (2000) 98(1–2):115–9. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(00)00439-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Ito S, Fujimori T, Furuya A, Satoh J, Nabeshima Y, Nabeshima YI. Impaired negative feedback suppression of bile acid synthesis in mice lacking βKlotho. J Clin Invest (2005) 115(8):2202–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI23076

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Yu C, Wang F, Kan M, Jin C, Jones RB, Weinstein M, et al. Elevated cholesterol metabolism and bile acid synthesis in mice lacking membrane tyrosine kinase receptor FGFR4. J Biol Chem (2000) 275(20):15482–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.20.15482

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Inagaki T, Choi M, Moschetta A, Peng L, Cummins CL, McDonald JG, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 15 functions as an enterohepatic signal to regulate bile acid homeostasis. Cell Metab (2005) 2(4):217–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.09.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Ogawa Y, Kurosu H, Yamamoto M, Nandi A, Rosenblatt KP, Goetz R, et al. βKlotho is required for metabolic activity of fibroblast growth factor 21. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2007) 104(18):7432–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701600104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Wu X, Ge H, Gupte J, Weiszmann J, Shimamoto G, Stevens J, et al. Co-Receptor requirements for fibroblast growth factor-19 signaling. J Biol Chem (2007) 282(40):29069–72. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C700130200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Itoh N, Ornitz DM. Evolution of the fgf and fgfr gene families. vol. 20. Trends Genet (2004) 20(11):563–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2004.08.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Talukdar S, Kharitonenkov A. FGF19 and FGF21: in NASH we trust. vol. 46. Mol Metab (2021) 46:101152. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Ornitz DM, Itoh N. The fibroblast growth factor signaling pathway. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol (2015) 4(3):215–66. doi: 10.1002/wdev.176

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Badman MK, Koester A, Flier JS, Kharitonenkov A, Maratos-Flier E. Fibroblast growth factor 21-deficient mice demonstrate impaired adaptation to ketosis. Endocrinology (2009) 150(11):4931–40. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0532

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Struik D, Dommerholt MB, Jonker JW. Fibroblast growth factors in control of lipid metabolism: from biological function to clinical application. Curr Opin Lipidol (2019) 30(3):235–43. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000599

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Nies VJM, Sancar G, Liu W, van Zutphen T, Struik D, Yu RT, et al. Fibroblast growth factor signaling in metabolic regulation. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2016) 6:193. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2015.00193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alföldi J, Wang Q, et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature (2020) 581(7809):434–43. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Taliun D, Harris DN, Kessler MD, Carlson J, Szpiech ZA, Torres R, et al. Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed program. Nature (2021) 590:290–9. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03205-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Wong BS, Camilleri M, Carlson PJ, Guicciardi ME, Burton D, McKinzie S, et al. A klothoβ variant mediates protein stability and associates with colon transit in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea. Gastroenterology (2011) 140(7):1934–42. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Dongiovanni P, Crudele A, Panera N, Romito I, Meroni M, de Stefanis C, et al. β-klotho gene variation is associated with liver damage in children with NAFLD. J Hepatol (2020) 72(3):411–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.10.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Panera N, Meroni M, Longo M, Crudele A, Valenti L, Bellacchio E, et al. KLB rs17618244 gene variant is associated with fibrosing MAFLD by promoting hepatic stellate cell activation. EBioMedicine (2021) 65:103249. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Xu C, Messina A, Somm E, Miraoui H, Kinnunen T, Acierno J, et al. KLB, encodhypogonadism is mutated in patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. EMBO Mol Med (2017) 9(10):1379–97. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201607376

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Stone SI, Wegner DJ, Wambach JA, Cole FS, Urano F, Ornitz DM. Digenic variants in the FGF21 signaling pathway associated with severe insulin resistance and pseudoacromegaly. J Endocr Soc (2020) 4(12):bvaa139. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvaa138

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Schreuder TCMA, Marsman HA, Lenicek M, van Werven JR, Nederveen AJ, Jansen PLM, et al. The hepatic response to FGF19 is impaired in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (2010) 298(3):440–5. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00322.2009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Chrysavgis L, Giannakodimos I, Chatzigeorgiou A, Tziomalos K, Papatheodoridis G, Cholongitas E. Role of fibroblast growth factor 19 in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol (2022) 16(9):835–49. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2127408

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Schumann G, Liu C, O’Reilly P, Gao H, Song P, Xu B, et al. KLB is associated with alcohol drinking, and its gene product β-klotho is necessary for FGF21 regulation of alcohol preference. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2016) 113(50):14372–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611243113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Desai BN, Singhal G, Watanabe M, Stevanovic D, Lundasen T, Fisher ffolliott M, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) is robustly induced by ethanol and has a protective role in ethanol associated liver injury. Mol Metab (2017) 6(11):1395–406. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.08.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Søberg S, Andersen ES, Dalsgaard NB, Jarlhelt I, Hansen NL, Hoffmann N, et al. FGF21, a liver hormone that inhibits alcohol intake in mice, increases in human circulation after acute alcohol ingestion and sustained binge drinking at Oktoberfest. Mol Metab (2018) 11:96–103. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.03.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Song P, Zechner C, Hernandez G, Cánovas J, Xie Y, Sondhi V, et al. The hormone FGF21 stimulates water drinking in response to ketogenic diet and alcohol. Cell Metab (2018) 27(6):1338–47. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.04.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Flippo KH, Trammell SAJ, Gillum MP, Aklan I, Perez MB, Yavuz Y, et al. FGF21 suppresses alcohol consumption through an amygdalo-striatal circuit. Cell Metab (2022) 34(2):317–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.12.024

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Talukdar S, Zhou Y, Li D, Rossulek M, Dong J, Somayaji V, et al. A long-acting FGF21 molecule, PF-05231023, decreases body weight and improves lipid profile in non-human primates and type 2 diabetic subjects. Cell Metab (2016) 23(3):427–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.02.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Choi M, Schneeberger M, Fan W, Bugde A, Gautron L, Vale K, et al. FGF21 counteracts alcohol intoxication by activating the noradrenergic nervous system. Cell Metab (2023) 35(3):429–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2023.02.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Tao Z, Cui Y, Xu X, Han T. FGFR redundancy limits the efficacy of FGFR4-selective inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2022) 119(40):e2208844119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2208844119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Moure R, Cairó M, Morón-Ros S, Quesada-López T, Campderrós L, Cereijo R, et al. Levels of β-klotho determine the thermogenic responsiveness of adipose tissues: involvement of the autocrine action of FGF21. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2021) 320(4):822–34. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00270.2020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Brnich SE, Abou Tayoun AN, Couch FJ, Cutting GR, Greenblatt MS, Heinen CD, et al. Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework. Genome Med (2019) 12(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0690-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Fisher FM, Chui PC, Antonellis PJ, Bina HA, Kharitonenkov A, Flier JS, et al. Obesity is a fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21)-resistant state. Diabetes (2010) 59(11):2781–89. doi: 10.2337/db10-0193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Hale C, Chen MM, Stanislaus S, Chinookoswong N, Hager T, Wang M, et al. Lack of overt FGF21 resistance in two mouse models of obesity and insulin resistance. Endocrinology (2012) 153(1):69–80. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-1262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Fu T, Choi SE, Kim DH, Seok S, Suino-Powell KM, Xu HE, et al. Aberrantly elevated microRNA-34a in obesity attenuates hepatic responses to FGF19 by targeting a membrane coreceptor β-klotho. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2012) 109(40):16137–42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205951109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Díaz-Delfín J, Hondares E, Iglesias R, Giralt M, Caelles C, Villarroya F. TNF-α represses β-klotho expression and impairs FGF21 action in adipose cells: involvement of JNK1 in the FGF21 pathway. Endocrinology (2012) 153(9):4238–45. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-1193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. So WY, Cheng Q, Chen L, Evans-Molina C, Xu A, Lam KSL, et al. High glucose represses β-klotho expression and impairs fibroblast growth factor 21 action in mouse pancreatic islets: involvement of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ signaling. Diabetes (2013) 62(11):3751–9. doi: 10.2337/db13-0645

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Nygaard EB, Moller CL, Kievit P, Grove KL, Andersen B. Increased fibroblast growth factor 21 expression in high-fat diet-sensitive non-human primates (Macaca mulatta). Int J Obes (2014) 38(2):183–91. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.79

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Dong K, Li H, Zhang M, Jiang S, Chen S, Zhou J, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress induces up-regulation of hepatic β-klotho expression through ATF4 signaling pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2015) 459(2):300–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Zhao Y, Meng C, Wang Y, Huang H, Liu W, Zhang JF, et al. 1β inhibits β-klotho expression and FGF19 signaling in hepatocytes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (2016) 310(4):289–300. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00356.2015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Gallego-Escuredo JM, Gómez-Ambrosi J, Catalan V, Domingo P, Giralt M, Frühbeck G, et al. Opposite alterations in FGF21 and FGF19 levels and disturbed expression of the receptor machinery for endocrine FGFs in obese patients. Int J Obes (2015) 39(1):121–9. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.76

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Suzuki M, Lee AY, Vázquez-Medina JP, Viscarra JA, Crocker DE, Ortiz RM. Plasma FGF21 concentrations, adipose fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 and b-klotho expression decrease with fasting in northern elephant seals. Gen Comp Endocrinol (2015) 216(1):86–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.03.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Markan KR, Naber MC, Small SM, Peltekian L, Kessler RL, Potthoff MJ. FGF21 resistance is not mediated by downregulation of beta-klotho expression in white adipose tissue. . Mol Metab (2017) 6(6):602–10. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.03.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Lee KJ, Jang YO, Cha SK, Kim MY, Park KS, Eom YW, et al. Expression of fibroblast growth factor 21 and β-klotho regulates hepatic fibrosis through the nuclear factor-κB and c-jun n-terminal kinase pathways. Gut Liver (2018) 12(4):449–56. doi: 10.5009/gnl17443

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Nygaard EB, Orskov C, Almdal T, Vestergaard H, Andersen B. Fasting decreases plasma FGF21 in obese subjects and the expression of FGF21 receptors in adipose tissue in both lean and obese subjects. J Endocrinol (2018) 239(1):73–80. doi: 10.1530/JOE-18-0002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Cirera S, Taşöz E, Jacobsen JM, et al. The expression signatures in liver and adipose tissue from obese Göttingen Minipigs reveal a predisposition for healthy fat accumulation. Nutr Diabetes (2020) 10(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s41387-020-0112-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Ellulu MS, Patimah I, Khaza H, Rahmat A, Abed Y, Sci AM. Obesity and inflammation: the linking mechanism and the complications. Arch Med Sci (2017) 13(4):851–63. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.58928

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Youm YH, Nguyen KY, Grant RW, Goldberg EL, Bodogai M, Kim D, et al. The ketone metabolite β-hydroxybutyrate blocks NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated inflammatory disease. Nat Med (2015) 21(3):263–9. doi: 10.1038/nm.3804

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Jager J, Wang F, Fang B, Lim HW, Peed LC, Steger DJ, et al. The nuclear receptor rev-erbα regulates adipose tissue-specific FGF21 signaling. J Biol Chem (2016) 291(20):10867–75. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.719120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Adams AC, Coskun T, Cheng CC, O’Farrell LS, DuBois SL, Kharitonenkov A. Fibroblast growth factor 21 is not required for the antidiabetic actions of the thiazoladinediones. Mol Metab (2013) 2(3):205–14. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2013.05.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Lee J, Seok S, Yu P, Kim K, Smith Z, Rivas-Astroza M, et al. Genomic analysis of hepatic farnesoid X receptor binding sites reveals altered binding in obesity and direct gene repression by farnesoid X receptor in mice. Hepatology (2012) 56(1):108–17. doi: 10.1002/hep.25609

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Fu T, Kim YC, Byun S, Kim DH, Seok S, Suino-Powell K, et al. FXR primes the liver for intestinal FGF15 signaling by transient induction of β-klotho. Mol Endocrinol (2016) 30(1):92–103. doi: 10.1210/me.2015-1226

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Fu T, Kemper JK. MicroRNA-34a and impaired FGF19/21 signaling in obesity. Vitamins Hormones (2016) 101:175–96. doi: 10.1016/bs.vh.2016.02.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Cermelli S, Ruggieri A, Marrero JA, Ioannou GN, Beretta L. Circulating microRNAs in patients with chronic hepatitis c and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. PloS One (2011) 6(8):e23937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023937

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Kong L, Zhu J, Han W, Jiang X, Xu M, Zhao Y, et al. Significance of serum microRNAs in pre-diabetes and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a clinical study. Acta Diabetol (2011) 48(1):61–9. doi: 10.1007/s00592-010-0226-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Markan KR. Defining “FGF21 resistance” during obesity: controversy, criteria and unresolved questions. F1000Res (2018) 7:289. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14117.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Tanajak P. Letter to the editor: parameters, characteristics, and criteria for defining the term “fGF21 resistance.”. Endocrinology (2017) 158(5):1523–4. doi: 10.1210/en.2017-00056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Samms RJ, Cheng CC, Kharitonenkov A, Gimeno RE, Adams AC. Overexpression of β-klotho in adipose tissue sensitizes male mice to endogenous FGF21 and provides protection from diet-induced obesity. Endocrinology (2016) 157(4):1467–80. doi: 10.1210/en.2015-1722

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Jeffery E, Berry R, Church CD, Yu S, Shook BA, Horsley V, et al. Characterization of cre recombinase models for the study of adipose tissue. Adipocyte (2014) 3(3):206–11. doi: 10.4161/adip.29674

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Lee S, Choi J, Mohanty J, Sousa LP, Tome F, Pardon E, et al. Structures of β-klotho reveal a zip code-like mechanism for endocrine FGF signaling. Nature (2018) 553:501–5. doi: 10.1038/nature25010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Kuzina ES, Ung PMU, Mohanty J, Tome F, Choi J, Pardon E, et al. Structures of ligand-occupied β-klotho complexes reveal a molecular mechanism underlying endocrine FGF specificity and activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2019) 116(16):7819–24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1822055116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Triantis V, Saeland E, Bijl N, Oude-Elferink RP, Jansen PLM. Glycosylation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 is a key regulator of fibroblast growth factor 19-mediated down-regulation of cytochrome P450 7A1. Hepatology (2010) 52(2):656–66. doi: 10.1002/hep.23708

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Shi SY, Lu YW, Richardson J, Min X, Weiszmann J, Richards WG, et al. A systematic dissection of sequence elements determining β-klotho and FGF interaction and signaling. Sci Rep (2018) 8(1):11045. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29396-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature (2021) 596:583–9. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Ding X, Boney-Montoya J, Owen BM, Bookout AL, Coate KC, Mangelsdorf DJ, et al. βKslotho is required for fibroblast growth factor 21 effects on growth and metabolism. Cell Metab (2012) 16(3):387–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.08.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Hultman K, Scarlett JM, Baquero AF, Cornea A, Zhang Y, Salinas CBG, et al. The central fibroblast growth factor receptor/beta klotho system: comprehensive mapping in mus musculus and comparisons to nonhuman primate and human samples using an automated in situ hybridization platform. J Comp Neurol (2019) 527(12):2069–85. doi: 10.1002/cne.24668

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Tacer KF, Bookout AL, Ding X, Kurosu H, John GB, Wang L, et al. Research resource: comprehensive expression atlas of the fibroblast growth factor system in adult mouse. Mol Endocrinol (2010) 24(10):2050–64. doi: 10.1210/me.2010-0142

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Zweers SJLB, Booij KAC, Komuta M, Roskams T, Gouma DJ, Jansen PLM, et al. The human gallbladder secretes fibroblast growth factor 19 into bile: towards defining the role of fibroblast growth factor 19 in the enterobiliary tract. Hepatology (2012) 55(2):575–83. doi: 10.1002/hep.24702

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Sinha J, Chen F, Miloh T, Burns RC, Yu Z, Shneider BL. β-klotho and FGF-15/19 inhibit the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter in enterocytes and cholangiocytes. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (2008) 295(5):996–1003. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.90343.2008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Olejnik A, Franczak A, Krzywonos-Zawadzka A, Kałużna-Oleksy M, Bil-Lula I. The biological role of klotho protein in the development of cardiovascular diseases. BioMed Res Int (2018) 2018:5171945. doi: 10.1155/2018/5171945

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Liang P, Zhong L, Gong L, Wang J, Zhu Y, Liu W, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 protects rat cardiomyocytes from endoplasmic reticulum stress by promoting the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 signaling pathway. Int J Mol Med (2017) 40(5):1477–85. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2017.3140

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Liu SQ, Roberts D, Kharitonenkov A, Zhang B, Hanson SM, Li YC, et al. Endocrine protection of ischemic myocardium by FGF21 from the liver and adipose tissue. Sci Rep (2013) 3:2767. doi: 10.1038/srep02767

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Rupérez C, Lerin C, Ferrer-Curriu G, Cairo M, Mas-Stachurska A, Sitges M, et al. Autophagic control of cardiac steatosis through FGF21 in obesity-associated cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol (2018) 260:163–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.02.109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Planavila A, Redondo-Angulo I, Ribas F, Garrabou G, Casademont J, Giralt M, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 protects the heart from oxidative stress. Cardiovasc Res (2015) 106(1):19–31. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvu263

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Bookout AL, de Groot MHM, Owen BM, Lee S, Gautron L, Lawrence HL, et al. FGF21 regulates metabolism and circadian behavior by acting on the nervous system. Nat Med (2013) 19(9):1147–52. doi: 10.1038/nm.3249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Owen BM, Ding X, Morgan DA, Coate KC, Bookout AL, Rahmouni K, et al. FGF21 acts centrally to induce sympathetic nerve activity, energy expenditure, and weight loss. Cell Metab (2014) 20(4):670–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.07.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Bono BS, Koziel Ly NK, Miller PA, Williams-Ikhenoba J, Dumiaty Y, Chee MJ. Spatial distribution of beta-klotho mRNA in the mouse hypothalamus, hippocampal region, subiculum, and amygdala. J Comp Neurol (2022) 530(10):1634–57. doi: 10.1002/cne.25306

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Fagerberg L, Hallstrom BM, Oksvold P, Kampf C, Djureinovic D, Odeberg J, et al. Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics (2014) 13(2):397–406. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.035600

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Karlsson M, Zhang C, Méar L, Zhong W, Digre A, Katona B, et al. A single–cell type transcriptomics map of human tissues. Sci Adv (2021) 7(31):eabh2169. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abh2169

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Jackson TC, Janesko-Feldman K, Carlson SW, Kotermanski SE, Kochanek PM. Robust RBM3 and β-klotho expression in developing neurons in the human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2019) 39(12):2355–67. doi: 10.1177/0271678X19878889

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Lan T, Morgan DA, Rahmouni K, Sonoda J, Fu X, Burgess SC, et al. FGF19, FGF21, and an FGFR1/β-Klotho-Activating antibody act on the nervous system to regulate body weight and glycemia. Cell Metab (2017) 26(5):709–18. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.09.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Somm E, Henry H, Bruce SJ, Bonnet N, Montandon SA, Niederländer NJ, et al. β-klotho deficiency shifts the gut-liver bile acid axis and induces hepatic alterations in mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (2018) 315(5):833–47. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00182.2018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Lin BC, Wang M, Blackmore C, Desnoyers LR. Liver-specific activities of FGF19 require klotho beta. J Biol Chem (2007) 282(37):27277–84. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704244200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Wang YD, Chen WD, Moore DD, Huang W. FXR: a metabolic regulator and cell protector. Cell Res (2008) 18(11):1087–95. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.289

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Kobayashi K, Tanaka T, Okada S, Morimoto Y, Matsumura S, Manio MCC, et al. Hepatocyte β-klotho regulates lipid homeostasis but not body weight in mice. FASEB J (2016) 30(2):849–62. doi: 10.1096/fj.15-274449

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Tomiyama KI, Maeda R, Urakawa I, Yamazaki Y, Tanaka T, Ito S, et al. Relevant use of klotho in FGF19 subfamily signaling system in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2010) 107(4):1666–71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913986107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Arrese M, Miquel JF, Ananthanarayanan M. βKlotho: a new kid on the bile acid biosynthesis block. Hepatology (2006) 43(1):191–3. doi: 10.1002/hep.21022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Luo J. A nontumorigenic variant of FGF19 treats cholestatic liver disease. Sci Transl Med (2014) 6(247):247ra100. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009098

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Human Protein Atlas. KLB protein summary. Available at: https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000134962-KLB/tissue (Accessed 8 November 2022).

Google Scholar

93. Kharitonenkov A, Adams AC. Inventing new medicines: the FGF21 story. Mol Metab (2014) 3(3):221–9. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2013.12.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Adams AC, Cheng CC, Coskun T, Kharitonenkov A. FGF21 requires βklotho to act In Vivo. PLoS One (2012) 104(18):7432–7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049977

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Lin Z, Tian H, Lam KSL, Lin S, Hoo RCL, Konishi M, et al. Adiponectin mediates the metabolic effects of FGF21 on glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity in mice. Cell Metab (2013) 17(5):779–89. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Holland WL, Adams AC, Brozinick JT, Bui HH, Miyauchi Y, Kusminski CM, et al. An FGF21-adiponectin-ceramide axis controls energy expenditure and insulin action in mice. Cell Metab (2013) 17(5):790–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.03.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. BonDurant LD, Ameka M, Naber MC, Markan KR, Idiga SO, Acevedo MR, et al. FGF21 regulates metabolism through adipose-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Cell Metab (2017) 25(4):935–44. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.03.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Véniant MM, Hale C, Helmering J, Chen MM, Stanislaus S, Busby J, et al. FGF21 promotes metabolic homeostasis via white adipose and leptin in mice. PloS One (2012) 7(7):40164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040164

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Henriksson E, Andersen B. FGF19 and FGF21 for the treatment of NASH–two sides of the same coin? differential and overlapping effects of FGF19 and FGF21 from mice to human. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2020), 11. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.601349

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Kurosu H, Choi M, Ogawa Y, Dickson AS, Goetz R, Eliseenkova AV, et al. Tissue-specific expression of βklotho and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor isoforms determines metabolic activity of FGF19 and FGF21. J Biol Chem (2007) 282(37):26687–95. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704165200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Morón-Ros S, Uriarte I, Berasain C, Avila MA, Sabater-Masdeu M, Moreno-Navarrete JM, et al. . doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101113

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Guo A, Li K, Tian H, Fan Z, Chen Q, Yang Y, et al. FGF19 protects skeletal muscle against obesity-induced muscle atrophy, metabolic derangement and abnormal irisin levels via the AMPK/SIRT-1/PGC-α pathway. J Cell Mol Med (2021) 25(7):3585–600. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16448

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Fisher M, Kleiner S, Douris N, Fox EC, Mepani RJ, Verdeguer F, et al. FGF21 regulates PGC-1α and browning of white adipose tissues in adaptive thermogenesis. Genes Dev (2012) 26(3):271–81. doi: 10.1101/gad.177857.111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Hsuchou H, Pan W, Kastin AJ. The fasting polypeptide FGF21 can enter brain from blood. Peptides (2007) 28(12):2382–6. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2007.10.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Sarruf DA, Thaler JP, Morton GJ, German J, Fischer JD, Ogimoto K, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 action in the brain increases energy expenditure and insulin sensitivity in obese rats. Diabetes (2010) 59(7):1817–24. doi: 10.2337/db09-1878

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Owen BM, Bookout AL, Ding X, Lin VY, Atkin SD, Gautron L, et al. FGF21 contributes to neuroendocrine control of female reproduction. Nat Med (2013) 19(9):1153–6. doi: 10.1038/nm.3250

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Misrahi M. β-klotho sustains postnatal gn RH biology and spins the thread of puberty. EMBO Mol Med (2017) 9(10):1334–7. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201708180

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Hill CM, Laeger T, Dehner M, Albarado DC, Clarke B, Wanders D, et al. FGF21 signals protein status to the brain and adaptively regulates food choice and metabolism. Cell Rep (2019) 2 7(10):2934–47. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Flippo KH, Jensen-Cody SO, Claflin KE, Potthoff MJ. FGF21 signaling in glutamatergic neurons is required for weight loss associated with dietary protein dilution. Sci Rep (2020) 10(1):19521. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76593-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Flippo KH, Trammell SAJ, Gillum MP, Aklan I, Perez MB, Yavuz Y, et al. FGF21 suppresses alcohol consumption through an amygdalo-striatal circuit. Cell Metab (2022) 34(2):317–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.12.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Claflin KE, Sullivan AI, Naber MC, Flippo KH, Morgan DA, Neff TJ, et al. Pharmacological FGF21 signals to glutamatergic neurons to enhance leptin action and lower body weight during obesity. Mol Metab (2022) 64:101564. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2022.101564

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Coate KC, Hernandez G, Thorne CA, Sun S, Le TDV, Vale K, et al. FGF21 is an exocrine pancreas secretagogue. Cell Metab (2017) 25(2):472–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.12.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Kharitonenkov A, Shiyanova TL, Koester A, Ford AM, Micanovic R, Galbreath EJ, et al. FGF-21 as a novel metabolic regulator. J Clin Invest (2005) 115(6):1627–35. doi: 10.1172/JCI23606

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Berglund ED, Li CY, Bina HA, Lynes SE, Michael MD, Shanafelt AB, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 controls glycemia via regulation of hepatic glucose flux and insulin sensitivity. Endocrinology (2009) 150(9):4084–93. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0221

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Wente W, Efanov AM, Brenner M, Kharitonenkov A, Köster A, Sandusky GE, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-21 improves pancreatic β-cell function and survival by activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and akt signaling pathways. Diabetes (2006) 55(9):2470–8. doi: 10.2337/db05-1435

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Geng L, Liao B, Jin L, Yu J, Zhao X, Zhao Y, et al. β-klotho promotes glycolysis and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion via GP130. Nat Metab (2022) 4(5):608–26. doi: 10.1038/s42255-022-00572-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Hou Z, Ding Q, Li Y, Zhao Z, Yan F, Li Y, et al. Intestinal epithelial β klotho is a critical protective factor in alcohol-induced intestinal barrier dysfunction and liver injury. EBioMedicine (2022) 82:104181. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104181

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Lin D, Sun Q, Liu Z, Pan J, Zhu J, Wang S, et al. Gut microbiota and bile acids partially mediate the improvement of fibroblast growth factor 21 on methionine-choline-deficient diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease mice. Free Radic Biol Med (2023) 195:199–218. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.12.087

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Chen MM, Hale C, Stanislaus S, Xu J, Véniant MM. FGF21 acts as a negative regulator of bile acid synthesis. J Endocrinol (2018) 237(2):139–52. doi: 10.1530/JOE-17-0727

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Gavaldà-Navarro A, Hondares E, Giralt M, Mampel T, Iglesias R, Villarroya F. Fibroblast growth factor 21 in breast milk controls neonatal intestine function. Sci Rep (2015) 5(1):13717. doi: 10.1038/srep13717

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Harrison SA, Neff G, Guy CD, Bashir MR, Paredes AH, Frias JP, et al. Efficacy and safety of aldafermin, an engineered FGF19 analog, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology (2021) 160(1):219–31. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Zhou M, Learned RM, Rossi SJ, DePaoli AM, Tian H, Ling L. Engineered FGF19 eliminates bile acid toxicity and lipotoxicity leading to resolution of steatohepatitis and fibrosis in mice. Hepatol Commun (2017) 1(10):1024–42. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. DePaoli AM, Zhou M, Kaplan DD, Hunt SC, Adams TD, Learned RM, et al. FGF19 analog as a surgical factor mimetic that contributes to metabolic effects beyond glucose homeostasis. Diabetes (2019) 68(6):1315–28. doi: 10.2337/db18-1305

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Gaich G, Chien JY, Fu H, Glass LC, Deeg MA, Holland WL, et al. The effects of LY2405319, an FGF21 analog, in obese human subjects with type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab (2013) 18(3):333–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.08.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Kim AM, Somayaji VR, Dong JQ, Rolph TP, Weng Y, Chabot JR, et al. Once-weekly administration of a long-acting fibroblast growth factor 21 analogue modulates lipids, bone turnover markers, blood pressure and body weight differently in obese people with hypertriglyceridaemia and in non-human primates. Diabetes Obes Metab (2017) 19(12):1762–72. doi: 10.1111/dom.13023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Charles ED, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Pablo Frias J, Kundu S, Luo Y, Tirucherai GS, et al. Pegbelfermin (BMS-986036), PEGylated FGF21, in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes: results from a randomized phase 2 study. Obesity (2019) 27(1):41–9. doi: 10.1002/oby.22344

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Abdelmalek MF, Charles ED, Sanyal AJ, Harrison SA, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Goodman Z, et al. The FALCON program: two phase 2b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies to assess the efficacy and safety of pegbelfermin in the treatment of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and bridging fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis. Contemp Clin Trials (2021) 104:106335. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106335

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Sanyal A, Charles ED, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Loomba R, Harrison SA, Abdelmalek MF, et al. Pegbelfermin (BMS-986036), a PEGylated fibroblast growth factor 21 analogue, in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial. Lancet (2019) 293(10165):2705–17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31785-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Kaufman A, Abuqayyas L, Denney WS, Tillman EJ, Rolph T. AKR-001, an fc-FGF21 analog, showed sustained pharmacodynamic effects on insulin sensitivity and lipid metabolism in type 2 diabetes patients. Cell Rep Med (2020) 1(4):100057. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100057

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Harrison SA, Ruane PJ, Freilich BL, Neff G, Patil R, Behling CA, et al. Efruxifermin in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial. Nat Med (2021) 27(7):1262–71. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01425-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Wong C, Dash A, Fredrickson J, Lewin-Koh N, Chen S, Yoshida K, et al. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1/Klothoβ agonist BFKB8488A improves lipids and liver health markers in patients with diabetes or NAFLD: a phase 1b randomized trial. Hepatology (2022) Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1002/hep.32742

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. DePaoli AM, Phung V, Bashir MR, Morrow L, Beysen C, Yan AZ, et al. NGM313, a novel activator of betaklotho/ FGFR1c, improves insulin resistance and reduces hepatic fat in obese, nondiabetic subjects [abstract 140-LB]. Diabetes (2019) 68(Suppl. 1):140–LB. doi: 10.2337/db19-140-LB

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Hua S, Liu Q, Li J, Fan M, Yan K, Ye D. Beta-klotho in type 2 diabetes mellitus: from pathophysiology to therapeutic strategies. Rev Endocr Metab Disord (2021) 22(4):1091–109. doi: 10.1007/s11154-021-09661-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Harrison SA, Rinella ME, Abdelmalek MF, Trotter JF, Paredes AH, Arnold HL, et al. NGM282 for treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet (2018) 391(10126):1174–85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30474-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Harrison SA, Rossi SJ, Paredes AH, Trotter JF, Bashir MR, Guy CD, et al. NGM282 improves liver fibrosis and histology in 12 weeks in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology (2019) 71(4):1198–212. doi: 10.1002/hep.30590

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Rinella ME, Trotter JF, Abdelmalek MF, Paredes AH, Connelly MA, Jaros MJ, et al. Rosuvastatin improves the FGF19 analogue NGM282-associated lipid changes in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Hepatol (2019) 70(4):735–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.11.032

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Hirschfield GM, Chazouillères O, Drenth JP, Thorburn D, Harrison SA, Landis CS, et al. Effect of NGM282, an FGF19 analogue, in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial. J Hepatol (2019) 70(3):483–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.10.035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

138. Mayo MJ, Wigg AJ, Leggett BA, Arnold H, Thompson AJ, Weltman M, et al. NGM282 for treatment of patients with primary biliary cholangitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Hepatol Commun (2018) 2(9):1037–50. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Kharitonenkov A, Beals JM, Micanovic R, Strifler BA, Rathnachalam R, Wroblewski VJ, et al. Rational design of a fibroblast growth factor 21-based clinical candidate, LY2405319. PloS One (2013) 8(3):e58575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058575

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

140. Adams AC, Halstead CA, Hansen BC, Irizarry AR, Martin JA, Myers SR, et al. LY2405319, an engineered FGF21 variant, improves the metabolic status of diabetic monkeys. PloS One (2013) 8(6):e654763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065763

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

141. Stanislaus S, Hecht R, Yie J, Hager T, Hall M, Spahr C, et al. A novel fc-FGF21 with improved resistance to proteolysis, increased affinity toward β-klotho, and enhanced efficacy in mice and cynomolgus monkeys. Endocrinology (2017) 158(5):1314–27. doi: 10.1210/en.2016-1917

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

142. Foltz IN, Hu S, King C, Wu X, Yang C, Wang W, et al. Treating diabetes and obesity with an FGF21-mimetic antibody activating the βKlotho/FGFR1c receptor complex. Sci Transl Med (2012) 4(162):162ra153. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004690

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

143. Smith R, Duguay A, Bakker A, Li P, Weiszmann J, Thomas MR, et al. FGF21 can be mimicked in vitro and in vivo by a novel anti-FGFR1c/β-Klotho bispecific protein. PloS One (2013) 8(4):e61432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061432

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

144. Kolumam G, Chen MZ, Tong R, Zavala-Solorio J, Kates L, van Bruggen N, et al. Sustained brown fat stimulation and insulin sensitization by a humanized bispecific antibody agonist for fibroblast growth factor receptor 1/βKlotho complex. EBioMedicine (2015) 2(7):730–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.05.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

145. Chen MZ, Chang JC, Zavala-Solorio J, Kates L, Thai M, Ogasawara A, et al. . doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.09.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

146. Baruch A, Wong C, Chinn LW, Vaze A, Sonoda J, Gelzleichter T, et al. Antibody-mediated activation of the FGFR1/Klothoβ complex corrects metabolic dysfunction and alters food preference in obese humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2020) 117(46):28992–9000. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012073117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

147. Shi SY, Lu YW, Liu Z, Stevens J, Murawsky CM, Wilson V, et al. A biparatopic agonistic antibody that mimics fibroblast growth factor 21 ligand activity. J Biol Chem (2018) 293(16):5909–19. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.001752

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar