Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Endocrinol., 17 February 2023
Sec. Cellular Endocrinology
This article is part of the Research Topic E3 Ligase and its Targets or Co-factors in Endocrine Regulation View all 5 articles

Structure, activity and function of the lysine methyltransferase SETD5

Mingyang LiMingyang LiYanan HouYanan HouZiwei ZhangZiwei ZhangBowen ZhangBowen ZhangTing HuangTing HuangAiqin SunAiqin SunGenbao Shao*Genbao Shao*Qiong Lin*Qiong Lin*
  • Department of Basic Medicine, School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China

SET domain-containing 5 (SETD5) is an uncharacterized member of the protein lysine methyltransferase family and is best known for its transcription machinery by methylating histone H3 on lysine 36 (H3K36). These well-characterized functions of SETD5 are transcription regulation, euchromatin formation, and RNA elongation and splicing. SETD5 is frequently mutated and hyperactive in both human neurodevelopmental disorders and cancer, and could be down-regulated by degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, but the biochemical mechanisms underlying such dysregulation are rarely understood. Herein, we provide an update on the particularities of SETD5 enzymatic activity and substrate specificity concerning its biological importance, as well as its molecular and cellular impact on normal physiology and disease, with potential therapeutic options.

1 Introduction

Methyltransferases are a superfamily of enzymes very present in nature, acting in the methylation of proteins, nucleic acids, and small molecules (1, 2). These enzymes work by catalyzing a methyl group for a receptor molecule, generating S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) and a modified methylated molecule (3). This methyl group conjugation not only affects the bioconversion pathways of many drugs but also affects the properties of endogenous neurotransmitters and hormones (4). Moreover, methylation is fundamental to regulating gene expression. Unlike DNA methylation which has been linked to gene silencing, RNA and protein methylation show differential patterns of activating and repressing gene transcription. Proteins can be methylated at different amino acids, primarily lysine and arginine residues (5, 6). Gene expression can be governed by lysine methylation on two levels: methylation of histones and non-histone proteins such as transcription factors and chromatin modifiers (7).

2 Structural features of SETD5

The human SETD5 gene (OMIM 615743), also known as MRD23, SETD5A, 2900045N06Rik or mKIAA1757, is located on the chromosome 3p25.3 and encodes the SETD5 protein composed of 1442 amino acids (8). The SETD5 gene consists of 31 exons and is ubiquitously expressed in human tissues such as the brain, thyroid, skin, ovary, lung and endometrium (9, 10). SETD5 contains a SET (Su(var)3-9, enhancer-of-zeste, trithorax) domain and is thus annotated as a candidate protein of lysine methyltransferase, which methylates H3K36 up to the tri-methyl form (H3K36me3) (9, 11, 12) (Figure 1). It belongs to SET-domain lysine methyltransferase superfamily which functions to methylate certain histone lysine residues, resulting in regulating the expression of genes. However, there is evidence that SETD5 lacks the methyltransferase activity but scaffolds a co-repressor complex, including HDAC3, NCoR, G9a, and PAF1, which couples selective deacetylation of H3K9ac with methylation of this residue (1315). The yeast SET3 and SET4, Drosophila UpSET, and human MLL5 are homologous to SETD5 over their SET domains and, except for SETD5, contain a PHD finger (Figure 1). The PHD finger of MLL5 binds the H3K4me3 mark (16, 17), and Drosophila UpSET also recognizes H3K4me3 (16).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 SETD5 domain composition and homologue architecture. (A) Crystal structure of human SETD5 protein. (B) Schematic indicating the protein domain organization of human (h) SETD5 and MLL5, yeast (y) Set3 and Set4, and Drosophila (d) UpSET. SET domains are shown in red and PHD fingers are shown in green. The total number of amino acids is indicated for each protein. (C) SETD5 contains the SET domain and is annotated as a candidate protein of lysine methyltransferase, which methylates H3K36 residue. However, there is evidence that SETD5 lacks the methyltransferase activity but scaffolds the G9a/HDAC3 co-repressor complex, which couples methylation of H3K9 with deacetylation of this residue. Members of the Set3-Set4 SET domain subfamily are shown with known interacting partners and methyl-lysine binding activity of their PHD fingers. Known binding partners are shown in blue. Set4 is predicted to interact with other factors (shown in gray) that remain to be identified. MLL5 has known interactors, a subset of which are shown in blue, and other yet-to-be-determined factors are indicated in gray.

3 Biochemical features of SETD5

The main role of SETD5 is gene activation by trimethylating H3K36 residue (Table 1). In this reaction, SETD5 utilizes the cofactor SAM as a methyl group donor, which binds to the substrate-binding site of the SET domain (9). In contrast, SETD5 can induce the methylation of H3K9 independently of its SET domain. This is achieved by binding to G9a histone methyltransferase and HDAC3 histone deacetylase complex, thus forming a SETD5-G9a-HDAC3 co-repressor complex (13). SETD5 also deacetylates H3K9ac; when partnered with HDAC3/NCoR1, SETD5 is converted from a relatively promiscuous enzyme into a selective one (13). This implies a model in which the SETD5-G9a-HDAC3-NCoR1 co-repressor complex couples selective methylation of H3K9 with deacetylation of this residue at target genes. Furthermore, SETD5 recruits the HDAC3 complex to the rDNA promoter, resulting in the removal of H4K16ac and its reader protein TIP5, a repressor of rDNA expression (18) (Table 1). Another finding by Villain et al. was the connection of SETD5 with BRD2, a bromodomain protein that recruits transcription regulators onto the chromatin (19). In more detail, both SETD5 and BRD2 bind to upstream promoter regions of the Sema3A locus and BRD2 is necessary for regulating Sema3A expression by SETD5.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Summary of the identified SETD5 substrates.

Several mechanisms have been proposed to regulate SETD5 expression and activity. The nuclear localization signal (NLS) motif in SETD5 protein can control its nuclear levels. Another interaction that can handle the nuclear levels of SETD5 is its degradation by the proteasome via the APC/C E3 ubiquitin ligase (14) (Figure 2A). Furthermore, SETD5 expression is inhibited by miR-139-5p, which may be sponged by circRNA PTPRM (circPTPRM) (20). SETD5 is also downregulated by miR-126-5p, which represses the expression of neuron-related genes in neurons (19, 21); however, the importance of this mechanism remains to be explored (Figure 2B).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Regulatory mechanisms of SETD5 expression and activity. (A) SETD5 in NCoR-HDAC complex on primed enhancers is ubiquitinated and degraded by APC/C. The degradation of SETD5 from NCoR-HDAC3 co-repressor complex allows H3K27 acetylation and transits enhancers from primed to active state. (B) miR-139-5p or miR-126-5p binds to the SETD5 gene 3’ untranslated region (UTR) to repress the expression of SETD5 leading to low expression levels of Sema3A.

4 Physiologic functions of SETD5

4.1 SETD5, directly and indirectly, affects cellular functions

The cellular functions of SETD5 are primarily related to the trimethylation of H3K36, an active mark. Thus, SETD5 generates an “open”, more loose and accessible chromatin to transcription factors from a “closed” and inaccessible chromatin (9). SETD5 can also indirectly cause the deposition of repressive marks on histone tails by cross-talk with repressive methyltransferase. One indirect pathway of gene silencing is the interaction of SETD5 with the histone methyltransferase G9a, which dimethylated H3K9, establishing a repressive mark (13). Furthermore, the interaction of SETD5 with histone deacetylase HDAC3 causes the deposition of other repressive marks on histone tails (14). Therefore, SETD5 has the potential to interact indirectly with more pathways and repress a wider variety of genes. The change in chromatin architecture caused by SETD5, especially in gene enhancers or promoters, leads to the silencing of a vast array of genes. In these ways, SETD5 participates in several cellular functions, including regulation of the cell cycle and cell proliferation (22, 23), regulation of RNA elongation and splicing (9), control of brain and nervous system development (9, 19, 2427), maintenance of tissue homeostasis (2831), and embryonic development (22, 32, 33) (Figure 3). Recently, SETD5 has been extensively associated with tumorigenesis (10, 13, 23, 3439).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Roles of SETD5 in regulation of nervous system development, embryonic development and tumorigenesis. ASD, autism spectrum disorder; BC, breast cancer; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; ID, intellectual disability; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

4.2 SETD5 coordinates the nervous system development

SETD5 has been demonstrated to participate in the early development of the nervous system. At different developmental stages, SETD5 exhibits a high expression level in the cerebral cortex (40, 41). The de novo mutation of the SETD5 gene has been identified as a genetic cause of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as intellectual disability (ID), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and KBG syndrome (27, 4246) (Figure 3). Loss-of-function mutations in SETD5 lead to intellectual impairments often associated with speech, language, and developmental motor delays (8, 40, 4749). Psychiatric manifestations of ASD-like behavior and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) with hand flapping and ritualized movements have also been reported in SETD5 patients (40, 47, 5052). Furthermore, the dysregulation of the axis SETD5-H3K36me3 is responsible for the alteration of neural progenitor proliferation and the synapse impairment that leads to neurological symptoms (9). It has been recently proposed that ASD may develop from altered mechanisms affecting neural progenitors (40), suggesting that SETD5 may act as a key regulator in ASD development.

4.3 SETD5 regulates the embryonic development

Another major cellular effect of SETD5 is the regulation of embryonic development. During early embryogenesis, SETD5 is required for maintaining the expression of germ cell-related genes and SETD5-associated protein complexes containing Tbl1xr1 and Ctr9, which in turn are involved in regulating the germ cell-related genes in murine ESCs (33) (Figure 3). Deletion of SETD5 results in embryonic lethality at embryonic days 10.5 and 11.5 (22). In more detail, SETD5-deficient mouse embryos exhibit severe defects in neural tube formation, somitogenesis and cardiac development and have aberrant vasculogenesis in embryos, yolk sacs and placentas. Furthermore, the haploinsufficiency of SETD5 leads to disrupted developmental gene expression and cognition (41, 53). These data suggest a potential role of SETD5 in early embryonic development.

4.4 Connection of SETD5 with tumorigenesis

Knowledge about the function of SETD5 in tumors is sparse, and most of the information available is about its role in neurodevelopmental diseases (Figure 3). SETD5 is located on chromosome 3p25.3 in a region linked to various diseases and amplified in primary tumors (8, 54, 55). Genomic alterations of SETD5 occur in multiple cancer types, implicating its cancer-promoting role (56, 57). In most cases, the upregulation of SETD5 is detected in pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (13, 23, 56, 57). The high levels of the SETD5 gene are related to poor prognosis in patients with lung, bladder, and prostate cancer (35, 38, 56, 57). By contrast, the suppression of SETD5 expression leads to reduced cell growth and migration in pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (13, 34, 58), as well as enhanced resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs (13). In terms of the mechanism, SETD5 is proposed to act as a tumor driver by inhibiting tumor suppressor gene transcription through H3K9 methylation via interacting with G9a/HDAC3 complex (13). Another mechanism of SETD5 involvement in cancer is the regulation of cell cycle-related genes through activating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway (10, 23, 56) (Figure 3).

In addition, mutations or amplification in the SET-domain proteins has been previously reported in various cancers. According to data in the PECAN database (https://pecan.stjude.cloud/home), high-grade gliomas and acute lymphoblastic leukemias present SETD5 mutations. SETD5 gene mutations are also associated with prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, and neuroblastoma (36, 5961). Furthermore, SETD5 is identified with a rate of high-level amplification at around 10% in bladder cancer (38). Either mutation or amplification is demonstrated to promote the proliferation of cancer cells (38, 60).

Recent reports shed more light on how altered SETD5 activity promotes tumorigenesis and progression. These studies investigated the role of SETD5 in breast cancer, ESCC, and NSCLC (10, 23, 37). In more detail, SETD5 acts as a factor to reprogram stemness-related gene expression patterns. The deletion of SETD5 induces the inactivation of the PI3K/AKT pathway (10, 23). This leads to the repression of stemness-related genes like SOX2, CD44, and OCT4, which reduce stem cell-like properties and malignant transformation.

5 Outlook

Despite the recent achievements in the structural and biochemical analyses of SETD5 protein, not much information is available on its cellular functions. Nevertheless, the evidence that the methylation of H3K36 plays an important role in regulating enhancer activity and SETD5 is amplified in many cancers suggests that SETD5 must play a pivotal role in many different cellular processes. Epigenetic-based therapies are emerging as effective and valuable approaches in cancer, and targeting SETD5 may present a practical approach. Further research on the discovery and use of SETD5 inhibitors to combat cancer subtypes could help maximize the effects of current therapeutic regimens. First, a deeper understanding of the enzyme’s intracellular effects and affected genes is needed since there is evidence that SETD5 may also act as a tumor driver in some stages of cancer development. The cross-talk of SETD5 with other epigenetic enzymes also needs further exploration to minimize off-target side effects from its therapeutic targeting.

Author contributions

ML: writing original draft and editing. YH: writing-original draft. ZZ: investigation. BZ: writing original draft. TH: writing original draft. AS: review and editing. GS: writing-review and editing and supervision and funding acquisition. QL: editing and supervision and funding acquisition. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from The Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu Province (grant no. BE2020678) and The National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81871888).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Banco MT, Mishra V, Greeley SC, Ronning DR. Direct cetection of products from s-adenosylmethionine-dependent enzymes using a competitive fluorescence polarization assay. Anal Chem (2018) 90:1740–47. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03556

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Xue H, Yao T, Cao M, Zhu G, Li Y, Yuan G, et al. Structural basis of nucleosome recognition and modification by MLL methyltransferases. Nature (2019) 573:445–9. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1528-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Boriack-Sjodin PA, Swinger KK. Protein methyltransferases: A distinct, diverse, and dynamic family of enzymes. Biochemistry (2016) 55:1557–69. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b01129

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Xu J, Richard S. Cellular pathways influenced by protein arginine methylation: Implications for cancer. Mol Cell (2021) 81:4357–68. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.09.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Husmann D, Gozani O. Histone lysine methyltransferases in biology and disease. Nat Struct Mol Biol (2019) 26:880–9. doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0298-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Blanc RS, Richard S. Arginine methylation: The coming of age. Mol Cell (2017) 65:8–24. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.11.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Black JC, Van Rechem C, Whetstine JR. Histone lysine methylation dynamics: establishment, regulation, and biological impact. Mol Cell (2012) 48:491–507. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Kellogg G, Sum J, Wallerstein R. Deletion of 3p25.3 in a patient with intellectual disability and dysmorphic features with further definition of a critical region. Am J Med Genet A (2013) 161:1405–8. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35876

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Sessa A, Fagnocchi L, Mastrototaro G, Massimino L, Zaghi M, Indrigo M, et al. SETD5 regulates chromatin methylation state and preserves global transcriptional fidelity during brain development and neuronal wiring. Neuron (2019) 104:271–289.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.07.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Chen Q, Sun Z, Li J, Zhang D, Guo B, Zhang T. SET domain-containing protein 5 enhances the cell stemness of non-small cell lung cancer via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol (2021) 40:55–63. doi: 10.1615/JEnvironPatholToxicolOncol.2021036991

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Tran K, Green EM. SET domains and stress: uncovering new functions for yeast Set4. Curr Genet (2019) 65:643–8. doi: 10.1007/s00294-018-0917-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Wagner EJ, Carpenter PB. Understanding the language of Lys36 methylation at histone H3. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2012) 13:115–26. doi: 10.1038/nrm3274

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Wang Z, Hausmann S, Lyu R, Li TM, Lofgren SM, Flores NM, et al. SETD5-coordinated chromatin reprogramming regulates adaptive resistance to targeted pancreatic cancer therapy. Cancer Cell (2020) 37:834–849.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.04.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Matsumura Y, Ito R, Yajima A, Yamaguchi R, Tanaka T, Kawamura T, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of SETD5-containing NCoR-HDAC3 complex determines enhancer activation for adipogenesis. Nat Commun (2021) 12:7045. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27321-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Rincon-Arano H, Halow J, Delrow JJ, Parkhurst SM, Groudine M. UpSET recruits HDAC complexes and restricts chromatin accessibility and acetylation at promoter regions. Cell (2012) 151:1214–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Ali M, Rincon-Arano H, Zhao W, Rothbart SB, Tong Q, Parkhurst SM, et al. Molecular basis for chromatin binding and regulation of MLL5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2013) 110:11296–301. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310156110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Zhang X, Novera W, Zhang Y, Deng LW. MLL5 (KMT2E): structure, function, and clinical relevance. Cell Mol Life Sci (2017) 74:2333–44. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2470-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Nakagawa T, Hattori S, Nobuta R, Kimura R, Nakagawa M, Matsumoto M, et al. The autism-related protein SETD5 controls neural cell proliferation through epigenetic regulation of rDNA expression. iScience (2020) 23:101030. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Villain G, Poissonnier L, Noueihed B, Bonfils G, Rivera JC, Chemtob S, et al. miR-126-5p promotes retinal endothelial cell survival through SetD5 regulation in neurons. Development (2018) 145:dev156232. doi: 10.1242/dev.156232

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Jiang Z, Zhao J, Zou H, Cai K. CircRNA PTPRM promotes non-small cell lung cancer progression by modulating the miR-139-5p/SETD5 axis. Technol Cancer Res Treat (2022) 21:15330338221090090. doi: 10.1177/15330338221090090

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Poissonnier L, Villain G, Soncin F, Mattot V. miR126-5p repression of ALCAM and SetD5 in endothelial cells regulates leucocyte adhesion and transmigration. Cardiovasc Res (2014) 102:436–47. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvu040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Osipovich AB, Gangula R, Vianna PG, Magnuson MA. Setd5 is essential for mammalian development and the co-transcriptional regulation of histone acetylation. Development (2016) 143:4595–607. doi: 10.1242/dev.141465

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Piao L, Li H, Feng Y, Yang Z, Kim S, Xuan Y. SET domain-containing 5 is a potential prognostic biomarker that promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma stemness. Exp Cell Res (2020) 389:111861. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.111861

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Pizzo L, Lasser M, Yusuff T, Jensen M, Ingraham P, Huber E, et al. Functional assessment of the "two-hit" model for neurodevelopmental defects in drosophila and x. laevis. PLos Genet (2021) 17:e1009112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Miao SY, Miao SM, Cui RT, Yu AL, Miao ZJ. SETD5-AS1 stimulates neuron death in stroke via promoting PTEN expression. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci (2018) 22:6035–41. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201809_15940

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Yagasaki H, Toda T, Koizumi K, Sugiyama T, Ohyama T, Hoshiai M, et al. A de novo 10.1-Mb 3p25 terminal deletion including SETD5 in a patient with ptosis and psychomotor retardation. Pediatr Neonatol (2018) 59:319–21. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2017.09.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Rawlins LE, Stals KL, Eason JD, Turnpenny PD. De novo SETD5 nonsense mutation associated with diaphragmatic hernia and severe cerebral cortical dysplasia. Clin Dysmorphol (2017) 26:95–7. doi: 10.1097/MCD.0000000000000144

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Li M, Qiu C, Bian Y, Shi D, Wang B, Ma Q, et al. SETD5 modulates homeostasis of hematopoietic stem cells by mediating RNA polymerase II pausing in cooperation with HCF-1. Leukemia (2022) 36:1111–22. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01481-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Anderson E, Lam Z, Arundel P, Parker M, Balasubramanian M. Expanding the phenotype of SETD5-related disorder and presenting a novel association with bone fragility. Clin Genet (2021) 100:352–4. doi: 10.1111/cge.14014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Cheung MY, Roberts C, Scambler P, Stathopoulou A. Setd5 is required in cardiopharyngeal mesoderm for heart development and its haploinsufficiency is associated with outflow tract defects in mouse. Genesis (2021) 59:e23421. doi: 10.1002/dvg.23421

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Aoi H, Mizuguchi T, Ceroni JR, Kim VEH, Furquim I, Honjo RS, et al. Comprehensive genetic analysis of 57 families with clinically suspected Cornelia de Lange syndrome. J Hum Genet (2019) 64:967–78. doi: 10.1038/s10038-019-0643-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Fellous A, Earley RL, Silvestre F. The Kdm/Kmt gene families in the self-fertilizing mangrove rivulus fish, kryptolebias marmoratus, suggest involvement of histone methylation machinery in development and reproduction. Gene (2019) 687:173–87. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.11.046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Yu SE, Kim MS, Park SH, Yoo BC, Kim KH, Jang YK. SET domain-containing protein 5 is required for expression of primordial germ cell specification-associated genes in murine embryonic stem cells. Cell Biochem Funct (2017) 35:247–53. doi: 10.1002/cbf.3269

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Zhang Y, Yan L, Yao W, Chen K, Xu H, Ye Z. Integrated analysis of genetic abnormalities of the histone lysine methyltransferases in prostate cancer. Med Sci Monit (2019) 25:193–239. doi: 10.12659/MSM.912294

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Dmitriev AA, Rosenberg EE, Krasnov GS, Gerashchenko GV, Gordiyuk VV, Pavlova TV, et al. Identification of novel epigenetic markers of prostate cancer by NotI-microarray analysis. Dis Markers (2015) 2015:241301. doi: 10.1155/2015/241301

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Sowalsky AG, Xia Z, Wang L, Zhao H, Chen S, Bubley GJ, et al. Whole transcriptome sequencing reveals extensive unspliced mRNA in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Mol Cancer Res (2015) 13:98–106. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-14-0273

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Yang Z, Zhang C, Liu X, Che N, Feng Y, Xuan Y. SETD5 regulates glycolysis in breast cancer stem-like cells and fuels tumor growth. Am J Pathol (2022) 192:712–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2021.12.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Ding B, Yan L, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Xia D, et al. Analysis of the role of mutations in the KMT2D histone lysine methyltransferase in bladder cancer. FEBS Open Bio (2019) 9:693–706. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12600

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Pinard A, Guey S, Guo D, Cecchi AC, Kharas N, Wallace S, et al. The pleiotropy associated with de novo variants in CHD4, CNOT3, and SETD5 extends to moyamoya angiopathy. Genet Med (2020) 22:427–31. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0639-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Kuechler A, Zink AM, Wieland T, Ludecke HJ, Cremer K, Salviati L, et al. Loss-of-function variants of SETD5 cause intellectual disability and the core phenotype of microdeletion 3p25.3 syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet (2015) 23:753–60. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.165

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Deliu E, Arecco N, Morandell J, Dotter CP, Contreras X, Girardot C, et al. Haploinsufficiency of the intellectual disability gene SETD5 disturbs developmental gene expression and cognition. Nat Neurosci (2018) 21:1717–27. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0266-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Rauch A, Wieczorek D, Graf E, Wieland T, Endele S, Schwarzmayr T, et al. Range of genetic mutations associated with severe non-syndromic sporadic intellectual disability: an exome sequencing study. Lancet (2012) 380:1674–82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61480-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Parenti I, Teresa-Rodrigo ME, Pozojevic J, Ruiz Gil S, Bader I, Braunholz D, et al. Mutations in chromatin regulators functionally link Cornelia de Lange syndrome and clinically overlapping phenotypes. Hum Genet (2017) 136:307–20. doi: 10.1007/s00439-017-1758-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Szczaluba K, Brzezinska M, Kot J, Rydzanicz M, Walczak A, Stawinski P, et al. SETD5 loss-of-function mutation as a likely cause of a familial syndromic intellectual disability with variable phenotypic expression. Am J Med Genet A (2016) 170:2322–27. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37832

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Pascolini G, Gnazzo M, Novelli A, Grammatico P. Clinical refinement of the SETD5-associated phenotype in a child displaying novel features and KBG syndrome-like appearance. Am J Med Genet A (2022) 188:1623–5. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62679

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Crippa M, Bestetti I, Maitz S, Weiss K, Spano A, Masciadri M, et al. SETD5 gene haploinsufficiency in three patients with suspected KBG syndrome. Front Neurol (2020) 11:631. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00631

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Grozeva D, Carss K, Spasic-Boskovic O, Parker MJ, Archer H, Firth HV, et al. De novo loss-of-function mutations in SETD5, encoding a methyltransferase in a 3p25 microdeletion syndrome critical region, cause intellectual disability. Am J Hum Genet (2014) 94:618–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.03.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Fernandes IR, Cruz ACP, Ferrasa A, Phan D, Herai RH, Muotri AR. Genetic variations on SETD5 underlying autistic conditions. Dev Neurobiol (2018) 78:500–18. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22584

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Moore SM, Seidman JS, Ellegood J, Gao R, Savchenko A, Troutman TD, et al. Setd5 haploinsufficiency alters neuronal network connectivity and leads to autistic-like behaviors in mice. Transl Psychiatry (2019) 9:24. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0344-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Lin GN, Song W, Wang W, Wang P, Yu H, Cai W, et al. De novo mutations identified by whole-genome sequencing implicate chromatin modifications in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Sci Adv (2022) 8:eabi6180. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi6180

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Pinto D, Delaby E, Merico D, Barbosa M, Merikangas A, Klei L, et al. Convergence of genes and cellular pathways dysregulated in autism spectrum disorders. Am J Hum Genet (2014) 94:677–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.03.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Shen L, Li P, Zheng T, Luo M, Zhang S, Huang Y, et al. Comparative analysis of the autism-related variants between different autistic children in a family pedigree. Mol Med Rep (2021) 24:697. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2021.12336

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Schafer ST, Paquola ACM, Stern S, Gosselin D, Ku M, Pena M, et al. Pathological priming causes developmental gene network heterochronicity in autistic subject-derived neurons. Nat Neurosci (2019) 22:243–55. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0295-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Timmerman DM, Eleveld TF, Sriram S, Dorssers LCJ, Gillis AJM, Schmidtova S, et al. Chromosome 3p25.3 gain is associated with cisplatin resistance and is an independent predictor of poor outcome in Male malignant germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol (2022) 40:3077–87. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02809

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Arcand SL, Provencher D, Mes-Masson AM, Tonin PN. OGG1 Cys326 variant, allelic imbalance of chromosome band 3p25.3 and TP53 mutations in ovarian cancer. Int J Oncol (2005) 27:1315–20. doi: 10.3892/ijo.27.5.1315

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Yang Z, Zhang C, Che N, Feng Y, Li C, Xuan Y. Su(var)3-9, enhancer of zeste, and trithorax domain-containing 5 facilitates tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis through up-regulation of AKT1 signaling in breast cancer. Am J Pathol (2021) 191:180–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.10.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Yu H, Sun J, Zhao C, Wang H, Liu Y, Xiong J, et al. SET domain containing protein 5 (SETD5) enhances tumor cell invasion and is associated with a poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients. BMC Cancer (2019) 19:736. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5944-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Park M, Moon B, Kim JH, Park SJ, Kim SK, Park K, et al. Downregulation of SETD5 suppresses the tumorigenicity of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Mol Cells (2022) 45:550–63. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2022.0009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Kim JC, Kim JH, Ha YJ, Kim CW, Tak KH, Yoon YS, et al. Analysis of genomic pathogenesis according to the revised Bethesda guidelines and additional criteria. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol (2021) 147:117–28. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03391-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Pires SF, Tolezano GC, da Costa SS, Kawahira RSH, Kim CA, Rosenberg C, et al. Expanding the role of SETD5 haploinsufficiency in neurodevelopment and neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer (2020) 67:e28376. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28376

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Pizzo L, Jensen M, Polyak A, Rosenfeld JA, Mannik K, Krishnan A, et al. Rare variants in the genetic background modulate cognitive and developmental phenotypes in individuals carrying disease-associated variants. Genet Med (2019) 21:816–25. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0266-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: SETD5, lysine methyltransferase, posttranslational modifications, methylation, neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD), cancer

Citation: Li M, Hou Y, Zhang Z, Zhang B, Huang T, Sun A, Shao G and Lin Q (2023) Structure, activity and function of the lysine methyltransferase SETD5. Front. Endocrinol. 14:1089527. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1089527

Received: 04 November 2022; Accepted: 30 January 2023;
Published: 17 February 2023.

Edited by:

Antonella Di Pizio, Technical University of Munich, Germany

Reviewed by:

Cai Yafei, Nanjing Agricultural University, China
Zhengchao Wang, Fujian Normal University, China

Copyright © 2023 Li, Hou, Zhang, Zhang, Huang, Sun, Shao and Lin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Genbao Shao, Z2JzaGFvMDdAdWpzLmVkdS5jbg==; Qiong Lin, cWxpbkB1anMuZWR1LmNu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.