Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol., 23 March 2022
Sec. Reproduction
This article is part of the Research Topic Research Advances in Male Fertility: New Horizons for Investigating Human Testicular Function and Development of Clinical Fertility Preservation Approaches View all 11 articles

Short-Term Hypothermic Holding of Mouse Immature Testicular Tissue Does Not Alter the Expression of DNA Methyltransferases and Global DNA Methylation Level, Post-Organotypic Culture

  • 1Division of Clinical Embryology, Department of Reproductive Science, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
  • 2Division of Reproductive Genetics, Department of Reproductive Science, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
  • 3KS313, Epigenetics and Chromatin Biology Group, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India
  • 4Division of Reproductive Biology, Department of Reproductive Science, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
  • 5Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology (CeRA), University of Münster, Münster, Germany

Introduction: Cryopreservation of immature-testicular-tissue (ITT) prior to gonadotoxic treatment, while experimental, is the only recommended option for fertility preservation in prepubertal boys. The handling and manipulation of ITT prior to banking could influence the functionality, genetic and epigenetic integrity of cells.

Objectives: To investigate the impact of length of hypothermic holding of mouse ITT on the relative mRNA expression of the DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) and global DNA methylation, post 14-days of organotypic culture.

Methods: ITT from 6-day old mice were handled at hypothermic temperature (4 °C) for 6 and 24 h prior to 14-days organotypic culture. Relative mRNA expression of Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, and Dnmt3b along with global DNA methylation was measured from the cultured ITT.

Results: No significant variation in the expression of Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, and Dnmt3b was observed in relation to varying holding time periods used. Further, global DNA methylation was comparable between 0, 6 and 24 h holding groups.

Conclusions: Short-term holding of ITT at 4 °C does not affect the DNA methylation process post organotypic culture. While fully acknowledging the limitations of this approach in the mouse model, the results we presented in this report will be of significant interest to the field.

Introduction

Childhood cancer survivors are at risk of experiencing infertility as one of the long-term health complications of cancer therapy. In males, this is due to the potential impact of gonadoxic agents on actively dividing spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs), which provide the foundation for normal spermatogenesis (14). To overcome this health hazard, currently, cryopreservation of immature testicular tissue (ITT) is the only available fertility preservation option for prepubertal boys as spermatogenesis is not fully functional in them. However, this approach is still considered experimental (5, 6).

Due to the limited number of centers that offer ITT banking worldwide (5), transporting the tissue from the testicular biopsy site to the tissue banking facility is inevitable. In this regard, studies have determined the optimal conditions for ITT such as tissue size, storage temperatures, and storage periods in various models including human tissue (711). Recently, our group has demonstrated that ITT manipulation at 4°C had a minimal negative impact on the organotypically cultured germ cell population when compared to room temperature and 37°C (12). However, we believe that it is important to address the epigenetic integrity of germ cells from cultured ITT as epigenetic aberrations may negatively affect the subsequent developmental process.

DNA methylation is critical for fertilization, embryonic development, and postnatal life (1317). The family of DNA methyltransferases (DNMT’s) consists of Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, and Dnmt3b, responsible for maintenance and de novo establishment of methylation patterns on 5’-positions of cytosine on DNA (18, 19). Epigenetic modifications are heritable changes in gene function independent of alterations in DNA sequence (20, 21). Although studies have shown that global DNA methylation level and expression of enzymes responsible for DNA methylation are unaffected during in vitro culture (22, 23), the impact of hypothermic holding of ITT prior to the organotypic culture on DNMT’s expression and global DNA methylation is not elucidated so far. Hence, using the mouse model, this study was aimed to investigate the impact of hypothermic holding of ITT on the relative mRNA expression of the DNMT’s and global DNA methylation post-14-days of organotypic culture.

Materials and Methods

Animals, Ethical Clearance, and Testicular Tissue Collection

A total of twenty-four, 6 day-postpartum (dpp) male Swiss albino mice were used in the study. All experiments and animal handling were conducted in accordance with the institutional guidelines for animal experimentation after obtaining prior approval from the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (Kasturba Medical College & Kasturba Hospital Institutional Ethics Committee, approval #IAEC/KMC/93/2013). Animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and the testes were collected in alpha minimum essential medium (α-MEM + Glutamax; (32571-036; Gibco™, Grand Island, USA) containing 1% (v/v) penicillin-streptomycin (Pen-Strep; 15140-122; Gibco™, Grand Island, USA) and 5 µg/mL Nystatin (Nys; N3503; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). Testes were made fat-free using fine needles, under the stereomicroscope, and later randomly distributed/categorized for either holding-phase or direct culture.

Holding Phase of Testes

Holding the 6 dpp testes at hypothermic temperature (~4°C) was performed as depicted in the experimental outline (Figure 1). Briefly, the excised 6 dpp testes were cultured directly or transferred to tubes containing α-MEM + Glutamax media supplemented with 10% knock-out serum replacement (KSR; 10828-010; Gibco™, Grand Island, USA), with Pen-Strep and Nys, using a sterile forceps. The tubes were placed in hypothermic, i.e., in a cooling unit maintained at ~4°C. The holding phase interval was scheduled as 6 and 24 h, corresponding to short-range and long-range shipment. Post holding, these testes were processed for organotypic culture as described previously (12).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Flowchart of the study. Experimental outline to assess the impact of short-term hypothermic holding on epigenetic integrity of the testicular tissue.

Isolation of Total RNA, cDNA Synthesis, and Gene Expression Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from ITT using TRIzol reagent (15596018, Ambion life technologies, USA). 1 µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed using random primers by a high-capacity cDNA RT kit (4368814, Applied biosystems, USA) according to the manufacturer`s protocol.

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was carried out using Premix Ex Taq kit (RR390A, TaKaRa Bio, Japan), in StepOne™ Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). TaqMan assay (Thermo fisher scientific, USA) for DNA methyltransferases viz. Dnmt1 (Mm01151063_m), Dnmt3a (Mm00432881_m) and Dnmt3b (Mm01240113_m1) were used. qPCR results were normalized to Actb and Gapdh reference genes.

DNA Extraction and Global DNA Methylation Analysis

DNA was extracted from 25 mg of cultured ITT using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (51306, Qiagen, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer`s protocol. Extracted DNA samples were eluted with 100 µl of TE buffer and stored at -20°C until further needed. The global DNA methylation was measured using MethylFlash™ Methylated DNA Kit (P-1034-96, Epigentek, NY, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, methylated DNA was detected by 5-methyl cytosine (5-mC) antibody and quantified by colorimetric absorbance method at 450 nm using Multiskan™ FC Microplate Photometer (51119000, Thermo fisher scientific, Massachusetts, USA). The amount of methylated DNA was proportional to the OD intensity measured. Percent global DNA methylation (%5-mC) was calculated from the OD by the generated standard curve.

Statistical Analysis

Data were expressed as Mean ± SEM. The data were analyzed for normal distribution by the Shapiro-Wilk test. All the parameters were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Prism software, CA, USA). The data were considered significant at p < 0.05.

Results

Effect of Holding the ITT on mRNA Expression of DNA Methyltransferases

To assess the effect of ITT holding at 4°C for varying duration on the mRNA expression of DNA methyltransferases, Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, and Dnmt3b was analyzed using real-time qPCR. The relative expression of all three genes was normalized against the 6 dpp control group. The relative expression of maintenance DNA methyltransferases, Dnmt1 was comparable in all the holding groups (Figure 2A). Further, the levels of mRNA transcripts of de-novo methyltransferases, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b did not vary significantly in post-organotypic cultured ITT held at 4°C for various time periods (Figures 2B, C). Lack of statistical significance could be attributed to the variations in Ct values of real time PCR.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 mRNA expression of Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, and Dnmt3b. Real-time qPCR analysis to understand the effect of varying holding duration at 4°C on mRNA levels of (A) Dnmt1, (B) Dnmt3a, and (C) Dnmt3b. ITT held for 0 h at 4°C cultured for 14 days was used as a control in comparison to 6 and 24 h held cultured ITT in similar conditions. mRNA level of Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, and Dnmt3b gene was normalized against reference genes Actb and Gapdh. Data are presented as Mean ± SEM (n = 3).

Effect of ITT Holding Prior to Organotypic Culture on Global DNA Methylation

5-methylcytosine (%5-mC) level was analyzed to explore the impact of holding temperature and length of holding on global DNA methylation. Though a moderate decline in %5-mC level was observed in 6 and 24 h holding time in comparison to 0 h, the differences were not statistically significant (Figure 3). This observation indicates that short-term hypothermic storage of ITT does not alter the global DNA methylation level post-organotypic culture.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Global DNA methylation analysis in cultured ITT. Levels of percent methylated cytosine (5-mC) in cultured ITT. Cultured ITT held at 0 h intervals were used as a control in comparison to cultured ITT held for 6 and 24 h at 4°C. The data is presented in mean ± SEM (n = 3).

Discussion

The correct establishment of DNA methylation in developing germ cells depends on DNMT expression. The results from this study have demonstrated that short-term hypothermic holding of mouse ITT up to 24 h has no significant impact on the expression of DNMTs and global DNA methylation in organotypic cultured ITTs.

Previous studies have emphasized the importance of conventional DNA methylation during male germ cell development. DNA methyltransferases have dynamic expression during the proliferation and differentiation phase of spermatogenesis (24, 25). Targeted deletion of de-novo methyltransferases in prenatal male germ cells showed lower levels of DNA methylation in postnatal spermatogonia. Also, spermatogenic arrest and infertility were observed in such methyltransferases, deficient mouse models (24, 26, 27).

Therefore, in this study, we investigated the expression of DNMTs in cultured ITT after the tissue was subjected to hypothermic holding up to 24 h. The relative expression of Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, and Dnmt3b did not vary significantly between the varying holding time periods tested. This observation is in agreement with previous reports where the expression patterns of DNMT’s were unchanged in in vitro and in vivo derived spermatozoa (22, 23, 28). It has been also shown that fresh and frozen-thawed ITT can maintain DNMT1 and DNMT3A expression even up to 30 days of in vitro culture (23). Furthermore, spermatogonial stem cells obtained from non-human primates could maintain DNMT expression during short-term culture in vitro (22). Our data add new information to the existing literature that holding ITT up to 24 h at 4 °C has a minimal adverse effect on the DNA methylation process. Nevertheless, the Ct value variations in three trails could have affected the level of statistical significance. Hence, observations made in this study should be considered with caution.

The establishment of global DNA methylation in spermatogonial stem cells plays a key role in spermatogonial identity, its differentiation potential, and the accurate transmission of epigenetic information to the next generation (14, 15, 29). Most of the studies examining the global DNA methylation level in mouse testis were found to be stable at the postnatal period (29, 30). Also, Spermatozoa produced from fresh/cryopreserved in-vitro matured ITT had un-fragmented and condensed nuclear DNA (31).

Hence, it is important to understand the impact of ITT manipulation on the global DNA methylation level as fertility preservation techniques can coincide with the window of the establishment of global DNA methylation. Our observation showed hypothermic holding of ITT at 4°C for 24 h could decrease the global DNA methylation level (%5-mC) moderately, though it is not possible to establish the statistical significance in our study. Earlier, it has been shown that sperm derived from frozen-thawed ITT had a similar intensity of 5-mC compared to sperm derived in vitro (23).

While fully acknowledging the limitations of this approach in the mouse model, we feel that the results we presented in this report will be of significant interest to the field. We show that short-term holding of ITT at 4 °C does not affect the DNA methylation process. However, future research should focus on addressing the methylation errors in specific imprinted genes in human prepubertal tissues.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by Kasturba Medical College & Kasturba Hospital Institutional Ethics Committee, approval #IAEC/KMC/93/2013.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SA. Performed the experiments and was involved in the acquisition of data: RP and SRS. Analyzed and interpreted the data: RP and SU. Wrote the manuscript: SKA, SS, RP, and SU. Revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content: GK and SG. RP is the guarantor of this work and as such, had full access to all the data and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors have given final approval for publication.

Funding

This work was supported by the research grants from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR # 5/10/FR/8/2014-RCH) and Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB) research grant (EMR/2015/000012).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Jahnukainen K, Ehmcke J, Hou M, Schlatt S. Testicular Function and Fertility Preservation in Male Cancer Patients. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab (2011) 25:287–02. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2010.09.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Wallace WHB. Oncofertility and Preservation of Reproductive Capacity in Children and Young Adults. Cancer (2011) 117:2301–10. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Anderson RA, Mitchell RT, Kelsey TW, Spears N, Telfer EE, Wallace WHB. Cancer Treatment and Gonadal Function: Experimental and Established Strategies for Fertility Preservation in Children and Young Adults. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2015) 3:556–67. doi: 10.1007/s00441-015-2341-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Onofre J, Baert Y, Faes K, Goossens E. Cryopreservation of Testicular Tissue or Testicular Cell Suspensions: A Pivotal Step in Fertility Preservation. Hum Reprod Update (2016) 22:744–61. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Picton HM, Wyns C, Anderson RA, Goossens E, Jahnukainen K, Kliesch S, et al. A European Perspective on Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation for Fertility Preservation in Prepubertal and Adolescent Boys. Hum Reprod (2015) 30:2463–75. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev190

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Valli-Pulaski H, Peters KA, Gassei K, Steimer SR, Sukhwani M, Hermann BP, et al. Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation: 8 Years of Experience From a Coordinated Network of Academic Centers. Hum Reprod (2019) 34:966–77. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Yang Y, Honaramooz A. Effects of Medium and Hypothermic Temperatures on Preservation of Isolated Porcine Testis Cells. Reprod Fertil Dev (2010) 22:523–32. doi: 10.1071/RD09206

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Dumont L, Oblette A, Rondanino C, Jumeau F, Bironneau A, Liot D, et al. Vitamin a Prevents Round Spermatid Nuclear Damage and Promotes the Production of Motile Sperm During In Vitro Maturation of Vitrified Pre-Pubertal Mouse Testicular Tissue. Mol Hum Reprod (2016) 22:819–32. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaw063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Faes K, Goossens E. Short-Term Hypothermic Preservation of Human Testicular Tissue: The Effect of Storage Medium and Storage Period. Fertil Steril (2016) 105:1162–69. doi: 10.1016/j

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Faes K, Goossens E. Short-Term Storage of Human Testicular Tissue: Effect of Storage Temperature and Tissue Size. Reprod BioMed Online (2017) 35:180–88. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.04.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. De Michele F, Poels J, Vermeulen M, Ambroise J, Gruson D, Guiot Y, et al. Haploid Germ Cells Generated in Organotypic Culture of Testicular Tissue From Prepubertal Boys. Front Physiol (2018) 9:1413. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01413

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Salian SR, Pandya RK, Laxminarayana SLK, Krishnamurthy H, Cheredath A, Tholeti P, et al. Impact of Temperature and Time Interval Prior to Immature Testicular-Tissue Organotypic Culture on Cellular Niche. Reprod Sci (2021) 28:2161–73. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00396-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Hammoud SS, Nix DA, Zhang H, Purwar J, Carrell DT, Cairns BR. Distinctive Chromatin in Human Sperm Packages Genes for Embryo Development. Nature (2009) 460:473–78. doi: 10.1038/nature08162

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Stuppia L, Franzago M, Ballerini P, Gatta V, Antonucci I. Epigenetics and Male Reproduction: The Consequences of Paternal Lifestyle on Fertility, Embryo Development, and Children Lifetime Health. Clin Epigenet (2015) 7:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s13148-015-0155-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Stewart KR, Veselovska L, Kelsey G. Establishment and Functions of DNA Methylation in the Germline. Epigenomics (2016) 8:1399–13. doi: 10.2217/epi-2016-0056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Jenkins TG, Carrell DT. The Sperm Epigenome and Potential Implications for the Developing Embryo. Reproduction (2012) 143:727. doi: 10.1530/REP-11-0450

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Champroux A, Cocquet J, Henry-Berger J, Drevet JR, Kocer A. A Decade of Exploring the Mammalian Sperm Epigenome: Paternal Epigenetic and Transgenerational Inheritance. Front Cell Dev (2018) 6:50. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2018.00050

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Okano M, Xie S, Li E. Cloning and Characterization of a Family of Novel Mammalian DNA (Cytosine-5) Methyltransferases. Nat Genet (1998) 19:219–20. doi: 10.1038/890

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Goll MG, Bestor TH. Eukaryotic Cytosine Methyltransferases. Annu Rev Biochem (2005) 74:481–14. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.010904.153721

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Jones PA, Baylin SB. The Epigenomics of Cancer. Cell (2007) 128:683–92. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Dawson MA, Kouzarides T. Cancer Epigenetics: From Mechanism to Therapy. Cell (2012) 150:50. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2018.00050

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Langenstroth-Röwer D, Gromoll J, Wistuba J, Tröndle I, Laurentino S, Schlatt S, et al. De Novo Methylation in Male Germ Cells of the Common Marmoset Monkey Occurs During Postnatal Development and is Maintained In Vitro. Epigenetics (2017) 12:527–39. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2016.1248007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Oblette A, Rondeaux J, Dumont L, Delessard M, Saulnier J, Rives A, et al. DNA Methylation and Histone Post-Translational Modifications in the Mouse Germline Following in-Vitro Maturation of Fresh or Cryopreserved Prepubertal Testicular Tissue. Reprod BioMed Online (2019) 39:383–01. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.05.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. La Salle S, Trasler JM. Dynamic Expression of DNMT3a and DNMT3b Isoforms During Male Germ Cell Development in the Mouse. Dev Biol (2006) 296:71–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.04.436

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Marques CJ, João Pinho M, Carvalho F, Bièche I, Barros A, Sousa M. DNA Methylation Imprinting Marks and DNA Methyltransferase Expression in Human Spermatogenic Cell Stages. Epigenetics (2011) 6:1354–61. doi: 10.4161/epi.6.11.17993

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Kaneda M, Okano M, Hata K, Sado T, Tsujimoto N, Li E, et al. Essential Role for De Novo DNA Methyltransferase Dnmt3a in Paternal and Maternal Imprinting. Nature (2004) 429:900–3. doi: 10.1038/nature02633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. La Salle S, Oakes CC, Neaga OR, Bourc’his D, Bestor TH, Trasler JM. Loss of Spermatogonia and Wide-Spread DNA Methylation Defects in Newborn Male Mice Deficient in DNMT3L. BMC Dev Biol (2007) 7:1–18. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-7-104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Goossens E, De Rycke M, Haentjens P, Tournaye H. DNA Methylation Patterns of Spermatozoa and Two Generations of Offspring Obtained After Murine Spermatogonial Stem Cell Transplantation. Hum Reprod (2009) 24:2255–63. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Kubo N, Toh H, Shirane K, Shirakawa T, Kobayashi H, Sato T, et al. DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Dynamics During Spermatogonial Stem Cell Differentiation in the Early Postnatal Mouse Testis. BMC Genomics (2015) 16:1–17. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1833-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Kafri T, Ariel M, Brandeis M, Shemer RUL, McCarrey J, Cedar H, et al. Developmental Pattern of Gene-Specific DNA Methylation in the Mouse Embryo and Germ Line. Genes Dev (1992) 6:705. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.5.705

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Oblette A, Rives N, Dumont L, Rives A, Verhaeghe F, Jumeau F, et al. Assessment of Sperm Nuclear Quality After In Vitro Maturation of Fresh or Frozen/Thawed Mouse Pre-Pubertal Testes. Mol Hum Reprod (2017) 23:674–84. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gax048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: immature testicular tissue, organotypic culture, hypothermic holding temperature, DNA methylation, epigenetics, DNMT, fertility

Citation: Pandya RK, Uppangala S, Salian SR, Gupta S, Kalthur G, Schlatt S and Adiga SK (2022) Short-Term Hypothermic Holding of Mouse Immature Testicular Tissue Does Not Alter the Expression of DNA Methyltransferases and Global DNA Methylation Level, Post-Organotypic Culture. Front. Endocrinol. 13:854297. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.854297

Received: 13 January 2022; Accepted: 24 February 2022;
Published: 23 March 2022.

Edited by:

Giovanni Luca, University of Perugia, Italy

Reviewed by:

Andrea Crafa, University of Catania, Italy
Veronica Ceccarelli, Sezione di Biochimica, Italy

Copyright © 2022 Pandya, Uppangala, Salian, Gupta, Kalthur, Schlatt and Adiga. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Stefan Schlatt, c3RlZmFuLnNjaGxhdHRAdWttdWVuc3Rlci5kZQ==; Satish Kumar Adiga, c2F0aXNoLmFkaWdhQG1hbmlwYWwuZWR1

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share last authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.