Skip to main content

STUDY PROTOCOL article

Front. Endocrinol., 11 March 2022
Sec. Thyroid Endocrinology

Immunotherapy-Associated Hypothyroidism: Comparison of the Pre-Existing With De-Novo Hypothyroidism

Megan M. Kristan&#x;Megan M. Kristan1†David Toro-Tobon&#x;David Toro-Tobon2†Nnenia FrancisNnenia Francis3Sameer DesaleSameer Desale4Athanasios BikasAthanasios Bikas5Jacqueline JonklaasJacqueline Jonklaas6Rachna M. Goyal*Rachna M. Goyal6*
  • 1Division of Endocrinology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, United States
  • 2Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, United States
  • 3Division of Endocrinology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, United States
  • 4Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Medstar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD, United States
  • 5Division of Endocrinology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
  • 6Division of Endocrinology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States

Background: Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of solid malignancies, but is associated with endocrine-related adverse events. This study aims to dissect the natural course of immunotherapy-induced hypothyroidism and provide guidance regarding diagnosis and management in patients with and without pre-existing hypothyroidism.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using patients who received immunotherapy between 2010‐2019 within a multicenter hospital system. Participants were separated in three groups—those with pre-existing hypothyroidism, those who developed primary hypothyroidism and those with hypophysitis within a year of their first immunotherapy. Serial effects of immunotherapy on thyroid function tests (TFTs) and levothyroxine dosing were evaluated.

Results: 822 patients were screened, with 85 determined to have pre-existing hypothyroidism, 48 de-novo primary hypothyroidism and 12 de-novo hypophysitis. All groups displayed fluctuations in TFTs around weeks 6‐8 of treatment. In the pre-existing hypothyroidism group, the levothyroxine dose was higher at 54 weeks than at baseline with the difference showing a trend towards statistical significance (p=0.06). The observed mean levothyroxine dose was significantly lower than the mean calculated weight-based dose for all groups. This finding was most clinically significant for the de-novo hypophysitis group (mean difference: -58.3 mcg, p<0.0001). The mean 0.9 mcg/kg levothyroxine dose at week 54 for the de-novo hypophysitis group was statistically lower than the other groups (p=0.009).

Conclusion: It is reasonable to screen with TFTs every 4 weeks, and space out TFTs surveillance to every 12 weeks after week 20. Our findings suggest a more conservative approach for levothyroxine dosing in those developing de-novo hypothyroidism, especially hypophysitis, such as initiating at 0.9-1.2 mcg/kg.

Introduction

In recent years, the discovery of immunotherapy has transformed the management of several malignant conditions (1, 2). As of today, seven immunotherapy medications (Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, Ipilimumab, Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, Avelumab and Cemiplimab) have been approved by the FDA for treatment of solid tumors such as non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), melanoma, breast cancer and renal cell carcinoma, among others (39). These medications, commonly known as checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), consist of monoclonal antibodies against several proteins such as PD-1 (programmed cell death protein-1), PDL-1 (programmed death ligand 1 and 2) and CTLA4 (cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4), all of which diminish the immune response against antigens and act as regulators of the immune system. Moreover, the blockade of these regulators leads to augmentation of T cell activation and proliferation which are responsible for the antitumor response of immunotherapy (10).

With the increasing use of immunotherapy, the identification and reporting of the associated toxicities have become extremely important. Although the exact mechanism that leads to these immune related adverse events (irAEs) has not been fully elucidated, it is believed to be an autoimmune response secondary to the blockade of normal immune regulatory pathways (11, 12). Multiple endocrine irAEs have been identified including hypophysitis, adrenal insufficiency and diabetes, but the most frequently reported is the immune related thyroid toxicity (11, 1316). The endocrinologists need to be aware of those irAEs, and how to manage them as they are becoming increasingly common (17).

Previously described immune related thyroid toxicities include thyrotoxicosis, hypothyroidism and thyroiditis (11, 13, 18). The most common immune related thyroid toxicity is painless thyroiditis which presents with transient thyrotoxicosis followed by primary hypothyroidism. Thyrotoxicosis, defined as decreased TSH with an elevated Free T4 (FT4) or total T3 (TT3), is transient and typically develops 4 to 8 weeks after ICI initiation. Primary hypothyroidism, defined as high TSH associated with low FT4 or TT3, typically ensues 10 to 20 weeks after ICI initiation (19). More rarely, central hypothyroidism due to adenohypophysis impairment (i.e. hypophysitis) can be seen, characterized by low to mid normal TSH levels and low FT4 (13).

The frequency of these disorders is variable and depends on the specific immune ICIs classes (11). The overall incidence of hypothyroidism has been reported to be 6.6% and it is highest when receiving combination therapy with PD-1 plus CTLA4 inhibitors (15, 16, 18, 20). Patients on anti PD-1 or PDL-1 monotherapy have higher risks of developing hypothyroidism than patients on CTLA4 inhibitors (16, 18). Data on thyroiditis are still limited but the incidence ranges from 1.6% with nivolumab monotherapy up to 4.6% with PD-1 and CTLA4 inhibitors combination therapy (20).

Given the rising frequency of patients with various forms of cancer who are now being treated with ICIs, more data are needed regarding the immune related thyroid toxicities associated with these treatments. Moreover, there are no clear guidelines outlining the screening, surveillance, and management of immune related thyroid toxicities. Thereby, this retrospective review aims to evaluate treatment for immunotherapy-induced hypothyroidism and provide guidance on the management of these adverse events in patients with and without pre-existing hypothyroidism.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Sample

This was a retrospective, multi-center, cohort study conducted within a large hospital system from the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Area. An initial screening of the electronic medical records was conducted through Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) (21). A total of 822 patients who had received single or double agent immunotherapy between 2010 and 2019 within the hospital system were identified. From this pool, the patients that had a diagnosis of hypothyroidism or had abnormal thyroid function tests were identified to obtain a final sample of 145 participants. A portion of the patients included in the current study received immunotherapy in the setting of clinical trials. Per protocol, thyroid function tests were checked before initiation of immunotherapy and before each dose of immunotherapy.

Data Collection

A database was built based on an electronic case information form and manual review of the medical records was conducted for each participant. The following demographic and clinical information were recorded: 1) Age, sex and race; 2) Type of cancer; 3) Date of immune therapy initiation; 4) Check point inhibitor(s) used; 5) TSH prior to initiation of immune therapy; 6) TSH and FT4 levels every 2 weeks for the initial 12 weeks of treatment and every 4 weeks from the weeks 16 to 36 of treatment; 6) Use and dose of levothyroxine prior to the initiation of immune therapy; and 7) Use and dose of levothyroxine every 2 weeks for the initial 12 weeks of treatment, and every 4 weeks from the weeks 16 to 36 of treatment.

In order to avoid misclassification of the immunotherapy-induced hypothyroidism diagnosis, the following measures were taken: a) a manual review of the Oncologist/Endocrinologist notes was performed to ensure cases of non-thyroidal illness were not included; b) patients with Head and Neck malignancies represented 5.5% of the cohort, and a manual review of the medical records was performed to ensure hypothyroidism was ICI-related, and not secondary to external beam radiation therapy; c) in cases of patients on tyrosine kinase inhibitors or other medications that could be considered culprits for development of hypothyroidism, a manual review of the Oncologist/Endocrinologist notes was performed to ensure clear documentation that hypothyroidism was ICI-induced.

Statistical Analysis

The participants were considered to be clinically euthyroid if they had normal TSH (Normal range: 0.5-4.7 mIU/L) and FT4 (Normal range: 0.8-1.7 ng/dL) levels prior to immunotherapy initiation. The sample was separated into three cohorts—those with hypothyroidism predating the first dose of immunotherapy (On levothyroxine replacement or a documented diagnosis of hypothyroidism prior to receiving ICI), and those who developed primary hypothyroidism (Defined as an elevated TSH and low FT4 levels) and hypophysitis (Defined as low FT4 and TSH levels and at least one more anterior pituitary hormonal deficit: central adrenal insufficiency or central hypogonadism) within one year of the first dose of immunotherapy. For the categorization of every patient, the trend and timing of their thyroid function tests as well as documentation from the Oncologist/Endocrinologist was taken into consideration. Patients followed by Endocrinologists for hypophysitis were asked to have FT4 levels checked in the morning before their Levothyroxine dose, or 4 hours after they had taken their Levothyroxine dose. Continuous variables were summarized using mean, median, standard deviation and inter quartile range, and categorical variables were described with counts and percentages. TSH and FT4 variability was evaluated through a logarithmic transformed regression model and levothyroxine dose variability was evaluated trough a piecewise linear regression with repeated measures where separate lines were fit for time before and after week 20.

Ethical Considerations

This project was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Georgetown University. Participant’s information, confidentiality, and integrity were respected throughout the duration of the study.

Results

Study Characteristics

A total of 822 patients who received immunotherapy between 2010 and 2019 were screened, and 145 patients were included in the study per the inclusion criteria (Table 1). Of the sample, 59% (85/145) had pre-existing hypothyroidism. In the cohort of patients with pre-existing hypothyroidism (n=85), 15 had Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, 10 post-operative, 4 post-ablative, 3 medication-induced (sunitinib, amiodarone, pazopanib), while in 53 cases there was no documentation in the electronic medical records about the etiology of hypothyroidism. Forty-one percent (41%, 60/145) developed hypothyroidism [48 patients (80%) presented with primary hypothyroidism and 12 patients (20%) developed hypophysitis]. In the cohort of patients that developed hypophysitis with central hypothyroidism, 100% (12/12) had central adrenal insufficiency and were placed on either Hydrocortisone or Prednisone, while 17% (2/12, both male) also developed central hypogonadism and were placed on testosterone replacement therapy. Additionally, at least 30% of the patients with de-novo primary hypothyroidism experienced transient thyrotoxicosis during the first 12 weeks.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Sample characteristics.

The studied group had a median age of 68 years, equal sex representation, and were predominantly of white race. No statistical difference was observed in the total sample’s average weight prior to and post immunotherapy (p=0.5). When compared to the pre-existing hypothyroidism group, the de-novo hypothyroidism group had lower average weights prior to and post immunotherapy. However, these differences did not prove to be statistically significant (p=0.5 and p=0.5, respectively).

The majority of patients had an initial diagnosis of melanoma or lung cancer and a smaller percentage was reported to have primary malignant involvement of the kidney, head/neck or other organs. There was wide variability in the number of doses of immunotherapy received, ranging from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 48 with a median of 4. Interestingly, the de-novo primary hypothyroidism group had a higher median of 7 doses as compared to 4 in the pre-existing hypothyroidism and de-novo hypophysitis groups. Monotherapy was more prevalent than combination therapy, and the most common agents used were Nivolumab (32.4%) and Pembrolizumab (27.6%).

Immunotherapy Effect on TSH Levels

The participants from the pre-existing hypothyroidism group started experiencing TSH variations at week 6 with clinically significant TSH elevations between weeks 8 and 36 (highest mean TSH of 16.73 mIU/L at week 36) followed by progressive normalization of TSH levels towards week 54, with the appropriate adjustment of their levothyroxine dose (data presented below). Approximately 65% of the patients with pre-existing hypothyroidism remained with TSH levels <5 mIU/L during the 54 weeks. The de-novo primary hypothyroidism group experienced TSH variations starting at week 2 with the peak mean TSH being documented at week 16 (30.09 mIU/L), and progressive normalization afterwards (Figure 1; Supplementary Table 1). In general, higher TSH values were observed in the de-novo primary hypothyroidism group when compared with the pre-existing hypothyroidism group. Additionally, the de-novo hypophysitis group experienced persistently low mean TSH levels after week 8. The timing of initiation of levothyroxine for the de-novo primary hypothyroidism and hypophysitis groups is presented in Figure 2.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Chronologic display of thyroid function tests for the pre-existing hypothyroidism, de-novo primary hypothyroidism, and de-novo hypophysitis groups. X axis represents the number of weeks from initiation of immunotherapy and Y axis represents average TSH level (mIU/L) in part (A) and Free T4 level (ng/dL) in part (B).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Timing of initiation of Levothyroxine in the de-novo primary hypothyroidism (n = 48) and hypophisitis (n = 12) groups. The data are presented as percentages with denominators being the total number of the de-novo primary hypothyroidism (n = 48) and hypophisitis (n = 12), respectively.

Immunotherapy Effect on FT4 Levels

The pre-existing hypothyroidism group did not have clinically significant chronologic variations of mean FT4 levels (Figure 1; Supplementary Table 2). The de-novo primary hypothyroidism group experienced a progressive decline in mean FT4 levels starting at week 4 with the lowest level reported at week 16 (0.86 ng/dL), followed by progressive normalization to a mean level of 1.14 ng/dL by week 54. In the de-novo hypophysitis group, mean FT4 levels dropped to 0.8 ng/dL by week 4 and normalized to 1.22 ng/dL by week 54. Of note, the appropriateness of LT4 dosing in the de-novo hypophysitis group was assessed two-fold: 1) based on patients’ symptoms (lack of hypothyroid symptoms), and 2) LT4 dosing was titrated based on a FT4 goal in the upper half of normal range (close to the middle of the normal range). The timing of initiation of levothyroxine for the de-novo primary hypothyroidism and hypophysitis groups is presented in Figure 2.

Trends of Levothyroxine Dosing After Initiation of Immunotherapy

In the pre-existing hypothyroidism group, the final mean levothyroxine dose at week 54 was 98 mcg (SD 39) while the mean levothyroxine dose prior to ICI initiation was 92 mcg (SD 42). The mean difference of 6 mcg showed a trend towards statistical significance (p = 0.06). In this group there was no statistically significant difference in levothyroxine dosing at week 54 regardless of whether the patient had a TSH level >5 mIU/L at some point during the studied period. In the de-novo hypophysitis group, at week 54 the mean levothyroxine dose was 69 mcg (SD 26), which is statistically lower (p=0.003) than the pre-existing hypothyroidism (98 mcg, SD 39) and de-novo primary hypothyroidism (90 mcg, SD 38) groups (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Comparison of observed levothyroxine doses at week 54. Part (A) compares mean levothyroxine doses in mcg. Part (B) compares mean levothyroxine doses in mcg per kg.

Because of the statistically significant differences, and the need to translate those results in clinical practice, the observed mean levothyroxine dose was calculated based on body weight as mcg/kg. Patients with de-novo hypophysitis were found to have a statistically lower (p=0.009) observed mean dose in mcg/kg at week 54 (0.9 mcg/kg) as compared to the pre-existing and de-novo primary hypothyroidism groups (1.4 mcg/kg and 1.2 mcg/kg respectively).

When comparing the observed versus the calculated (weight based = 1.6 mcg/kg) levothyroxine doses at week 54 in the three groups, there were statistically significant lower observed means in all groups (Table 2). The biggest mean difference identified was in the de-novo hypophysitis group (mean difference: 63 mcg, p = 0.001); and the smallest, in the pre-existing hypothyroidism group (mean difference: 58 mcg, P<0.0001).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Comparison of observed versus calculated (Weight based) Levothyroxine dose at week 54.

The chronologic variation of levothyroxine dosing was also evaluated (Figure 4). While in the pre-existing hypothyroidism group levothyroxine dosing remained relatively stable over time, in the de-novo hypophysitis group a sharp increase of 1.6 mcg per week was noted during the first 20 weeks, and a statistically lower weekly increase of 0.68 mcg/week was noted after week 20 (Mean difference -0.93 mcg, p <0.001).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Chronologic display of mean Levothyroxine dose levels. X axis represents number of weeks from initiation of immunotherapy and Y axis represents mean Levothyroxine dose in mcg.

Discussion

The use of ICIs has revolutionized the treatment of cancer, and those agents are now the first line treatment for several malignancies. Although immunotherapies lack the side effect profile of traditional chemotherapies, they present with a rather unique constellation of adverse effects. Endocrinopathies are common immune-related side effects, and they can be very severe and must be carefully monitored during treatment with ICIs (22). Thyroid dysfunction is the most common among the immune-related endocrinopathies, and more data are needed to elucidate the clinical course as well as management (13).

In the current study, we present data on the immune-related thyroid dysfunction from an extensive cohort of patients treated in one of the largest healthcare systems in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States. A total of 822 patients were included in the study, of whom 145 were found to have hypothyroidism and were further analyzed. We report an incidence of 7.2% (60/822) of de-novo hypothyroidism, of which 20% was secondary to hypophysitis while 80% was secondary to primary hypothyroidism. The incidence of de-novo hypothyroidism in the literature depends on the immunotherapy administered, and has been reported as low as 2% (23) and as high as 9.1% (24).

The mechanism by which immunotherapies cause thyroid dysfunction is still unclear. Orlov et al. reported that in 8 out of 10 patients with painless thyroiditis and hypothyroidism secondary to PD1 antibody treatment, anti-thyroglobulin and anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies were detected, but no thyrotropin binding inhibitory immunoglobulins were found (25). The investigators hypothesized that polymorphic variants in the PD1 gene in some patients might predispose them to an increased risk of thyroid dysfunction. Unfortunately, because of the retrospective nature of the current study and the fact that measuring thyroid autoantibodies is not considered part of routine care of those patients, very few patients had thyroid autoantibodies values and no meaningful analysis could be performed. More prospective studies are needed in order to evaluate this potential pathophysiologic association.

The timeline of thyroid dysfunction was also studied. TSH variations were noted very early (2 weeks) after initiation of immunotherapy in the de-novo hypothyroidism group, while in the group with pre-existing hypothyroidism those changes were noted sometime later in the course of treatment (6 weeks). Those results support the findings from previous studies that immune related thyroid toxicity usually develops within the first 20 weeks of therapy, with symptoms of hypothyroidism first presenting after a median of 12 weeks in cases of primary hypothyroidism and 6 weeks in cases of transient thyrotoxicosis (11).

Despite the wide use of immunotherapy and the well-established thyroid side effect profile, there are no clear guidelines outlining the screening, surveillance and management of immune related thyroid toxicities. Initial recommendations from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) include obtaining baseline thyroid function tests (TFTs) prior to initiation of immunotherapy and following TFTs every 4 to 6 weeks to screen for immune related thyroid toxicity or every 6-8 weeks to monitor treatment titration (26). Additionally, if immune related thyroid toxicity develops, ICIs can be continued unless there is evidence of severe or life-threatening symptoms and thyroid hormone therapy is the same as in non-immune related thyroid diseases. Based on the data generated from the current study, we suggest checking TFTs every 4 weeks until week 20, and decreasing frequency of TFTs to every 12 weeks after week 20. However, in patients that will be initiated on higher doses of immunotherapy or combination therapy, we suggest that the initiation of TFTs be at 2 weeks after initiation of treatment.

In the current study, we included and analyzed patients with pre-existing hypothyroidism that were started on immunotherapy. Prior studies have suggested that patients with pre-existing hypothyroidism should be closely monitored since they could develop severe hypothyroidism or thyrotoxicosis and could require adjustments in their levothyroxine dosing (16). In the current study, we demonstrate that patients with pre-existing hypothyroidism have much smaller variations in the TSH values after initiation of immunotherapy. Their levothyroxine dose was higher at week 54, but that difference did not reach statistical significance. Hence, we suggest continuation of the levothyroxine dose upon initiation of immunotherapy and serial TFT checks every 8-12 weeks thereafter.

Finally, in the current study the dosing of levothyroxine was studied extensively in both the pre-existing and the de-novo hypothyroidism groups. Per the ASCO initial recommendations (26), in patients with de-novo hypothyroidism thyroid hormone therapy should be initiated as in non-immune related thyroid diseases (1.6 mcg/kg/d or a starting dose of 50 mcg for elderly patients). However, in the current study we present data that shows that a lower dose of 1.2 mcg/kg levothyroxine might be sufficient to treat de-novo hypothyroidism. Importantly, by week 54, the overall sample and individual groups had achieved a biochemically euthyroid state as evidenced by median TSH and FT4 levels within the normal range. Similar findings were noted in a 2019 retrospective cohort analysis in which patients who developed primary hypothyroidism post ICI had an average levothyroxine maintenance dose of 1.29 mcg/kg (27). Based on our data, patients who develop primary hypothyroidism as a result of immunotherapy can be started at a dose of 1.2 mcg/kg/d with titration based on TFTs.

It has been observed that patients with secondary hypothyroidism may be euthyroid while taking weight-based doses of 1.5-1.6 mcg/kg (28) or 1.3-1.6 mcg/kg (29). The most pronounced difference from such weight-based estimates was noted in the de-novo hypophysitis group of patients in our study, such that these patients required 0.9 mcg/kg/d at week 54. Patients that develop immunotherapy-induced hypophysitis represent an older population with significant comorbidities. Hence the treating physicians are usually more conservative in titrating levothyroxine doses. Moreover, given the fact that the vast majority of this patient population also has other anterior pituitary hormonal deficits with overlapping symptoms, the treating physicians are cautious to avoid unnecessary over-replacement. For these reasons, we consider that in patients with hypophysitis secondary to immunotherapy it would be reasonable to start levothyroxine replacement therapy at approximately 50% of the recommended weight based dose (0.9 mcg/kg/day) and then titrate based on symptoms and FT4 goals to the upper half of the normal range.

This study has several limitations. Given the retrospective design without standardized protocols for TFTs monitoring and the use of different electronic medical records throughout the hospital system, it is possible that missing data on the baseline and biweekly TSH and FT4 levels could have led to the omission of patients with de-novo hypothyroidism and the underestimation of the frequency of transient thyrotoxicosis. Additionally, our results were not stratified per type of ICI given the size of the sample. Moreover, we could not collect TPO antibodies data as these were not clinically ordered for the vast majority of patients, and the very small number that was collected precluded any further meaningful analysis. The TPO antibody titer has been reported as a useful marker to predict both severity of thyroid toxicity and rates of occurrence. Despite these limitations, our results may inform current clinical practice and guide the design of future randomized prospective studies and inter hospital’s database collaborations to revise and strengthen the current findings and its derived suggestions.

In conclusion, the current retrospective review provides important insight into the management and treatment of hypothyroid patients receiving immunotherapy. A multidisciplinary approach is essential, and especially in patients with complex endocrinopathies the joint management by an oncologist and an endocrinologist would be extremely beneficial for the patients.

Author Contributions

MK, JJ, and RG are responsible for the conception and design of the study. MK, DTT, and NF are responsible for data collection. MK, DTT, SD, and AB are responsible for data analysis and interpretation. DTT and AB are responsible for manuscript preparation. All the authors participated in the critical revision of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

Support for the current project was provided by a pilot grant from the Department of Medicine entitled ‘Effect of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors on Thyroid Function: an Institutional Experience’ that was awarded to RG by the Department of Medicine at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital. The statistical analyses utilized in this publication were performed by the Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design core supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number UL1TR001409. Data were presented in the form of an oral abstract entitled “Immunotherapy-associated Thyroid Disorders: Comparison of the Course of Pre-existing Hypothyroidism Compared with De Novo Hypothyroidism” at the 89th Annual American Thyroid Association Meeting (Chicago, IL – 11/2019).

Author Disclaimer

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.798253/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Arora S, Velichinskii R, Lesh RW, Ali U, Kubiak M, Bansal P, et al. Existing and Emerging Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Immunotherapy in Solid Tumors. Adv Ther (2019) 36(10):2638–78. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01051-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Gharwan H, Groninger H. Kinase Inhibitors and Monoclonal Antibodies in Oncology: Clinical Implications. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2016) 13(4):209–27. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Abril-Rodriguez G, Ribas A. SnapShot: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Cancer Cell (2017) 31(6):848–8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.05.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. FDA. Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA) Prescribing Information 2019 [Internet]. (2019). Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/125514Orig1s054lbl.

Google Scholar

5. FDA. Nivolumab (OPDIVO) Prescribing Information 2018. (2018). Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/125554s058lbl.pdf.

Google Scholar

6. FDA. Ipilimumab (YERVOY) Prescribing Information 2018. (2018). Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/125377s094lbl.pdf.

Google Scholar

7. FDA. Atezolimumab (TECENTRIQ) Prescribing Information 2019. (2019). Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/212320Orig1s000lbl.pdf.

Google Scholar

8. FDA. Durvalumab (IMFINZI) Prescribing Information 2018. (2018). Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/761069s002lbl.pdf.

Google Scholar

9. FDA. Avelumab (BAVENCIO) Prescribing Information 2017. (2017). Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/761049s000lbl.pdf.

Google Scholar

10. Pardoll DM. The Blockade of Immune Checkpoints in Cancer Immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer (2012) 12(4):252–64. doi: 10.1038/nrc3239

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Tan MH, Iyengar R, Mizokami-Stout K, Yentz S, MacEachern MP, Shen LY, et al. Spectrum of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-Induced Endocrinopathies in Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review of Case Reports. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol (2019) 5(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40842-018-0073-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD. Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Blockade. N Engl J Med (2018) 378(2):158–68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1703481

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Byun DJ, Wolchok JD, Rosenberg LM, Girotra M. Cancer Immunotherapy — Immune Checkpoint Blockade and Associated Endocrinopathies. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2017) 13(4):195–207. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.205

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Morganstein DL, Lai Z, Spain L, Diem S, Levine D, Mace C, et al. Thyroid Abnormalities Following the Use of Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen-4 and Programmed Death Receptor Protein-1 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Melanoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) (2017) 86(4):614–20. doi: 10.1111/cen.13297

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Jannin A, Penel N, Ladsous M, Vantyghem MC, Do Cao C. Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-Induced Thyroid Disorders. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol (2019) 141:23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.05.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Chang L-S, Barroso-Sousa R, Tolaney SM, Hodi FS, Kaiser UB, Min L. Endocrine Toxicity of Cancer Immunotherapy Targeting Immune Checkpoints. Endocr Rev (2019) 40(1):17–65. doi: 10.1210/er.2018-00006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Ruggeri RM, Campennì A, Giuffrida G, Trimboli P, Giovanella L, Trimarchi F, et al. Endocrine and Metabolic Adverse Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Overview (What Endocrinologists Should Know). J Endocrinol Invest (2019) 42(7):745–56. doi: 10.1007/s40618-018-0984-z

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

18. Barroso-Sousa R, Barry WT, Garrido-Castro AC, Hodi FS, Min L, Krop IE, et al. Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction Following the Use of Different Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Oncol (2018) 4(2):173–82. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Drug Effects on the Thyroid | NEJM. (2021). Available at: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1901214.

Google Scholar

20. de Filette J, Andreescu CE, Cools F, Bravenboer B, Velkeniers B. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endocrine-Related Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Horm Metab Res (2019) 51(3):145–56. doi: 10.1055/a-0843-3366

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) - A Metadata-Driven Methodology and Workflow Process for Providing Translational Research Informatics Support. J BioMed Inform (2009) 42(2):377–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Torino F, Barnabei A, Paragliola RM, Marchetti P, Salvatori R, Corsello SM. ENDOCRINE SIDE-EFFECTS OF ANTI-CANCER DRUGS: Mabs and Pituitary Dysfunction: Clinical Evidence and Pathogenic Hypotheses. Eur J Endocrinol (2013) 169(6):R153–64. doi: 10.1530/EJE-13-0434

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Downey SG, Klapper JA, Smith FO, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Royal RE, et al. Prognostic Factors Related to Clinical Response in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Treated by CTL-Associated Antigen-4 Blockade. Clin Cancer Res (2007) 13(22):6681–8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0187

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csőszi T, Fülöp A, et al. Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1–Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med (2016) 375(19):1823–33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606774

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Orlov S, Salari F, Kashat L, Walfish PG. Induction of Painless Thyroiditis in Patients Receiving Programmed Death 1 Receptor Immunotherapy for Metastatic Malignancies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2015) 100(5):1738–41. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-4560

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BJ, Atkins MB, Brassil KJ, Caterino JM, et al. Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol (2018) 36(17):1714–68. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Ma C, Hodi FS, Giobbie-Hurder A, Wang X, Zhou J, Zhang A, et al. The Impact of High-Dose Glucocorticoids on the Outcome of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor–Related Thyroid Disorders. Cancer Immunol Res (2019) 7(7):1214–20. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0613

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Lania A, Persani L, Beck-Peccoz P. Central Hypothyroidism. Pituitary (2008) 11(2):181–6. doi: 10.1007/s11102-008-0122-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Beck-Peccoz P, Rodari G, Giavoli C, Lania A. Central Hypothyroidism - A Neglected Thyroid Disorder. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2017) 13(10):588–98. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.47

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: immunotherapy, hypothyroidism, check point inhibitor, thyroiditis, hypophysitis

Citation: Kristan MM, Toro-Tobon D, Francis N, Desale S, Bikas A, Jonklaas J and Goyal RM (2022) Immunotherapy-Associated Hypothyroidism: Comparison of the Pre-Existing With De-Novo Hypothyroidism. Front. Endocrinol. 13:798253. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.798253

Received: 19 October 2021; Accepted: 10 February 2022;
Published: 11 March 2022.

Edited by:

Trevor Edmund Angell, University of Southern California, United States

Reviewed by:

Salvatore Cannavo, University of Messina, Italy
Anupam Kotwal, University of Nebraska Medical Center, United States

Copyright © 2022 Kristan, Toro-Tobon, Francis, Desale, Bikas, Jonklaas and Goyal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Rachna M. Goyal, UmFjaG5hLk0uR295YWxAbWVkc3Rhci5uZXQ=

†These authors share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.