Stefan Kopf1,2†
Varun Kumar1,2,3†Zoltan Kender1,2Zhe Han1
Thomas Fleming1,2Stephan Herzig2,4,5
Peter P. Nawroth1,2,5*- 1Department of Medicine I and Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- 2German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
- 3European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Advanced Light Microscopy Facility, Heidelberg, Germany
- 4Institute for Diabetes and Cancer, Helmholtz Center Munich, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
- 5Joint Heidelberg-Institute for Diabetes and Cancer (IDC) Translational Diabetes Programme, Helmholtz-Zentrum, Munich, Germany
Patients with diabetes are over-represented among the total cases reported with “idiopathic” pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This raises the question, whether this is an association only or whether diabetes itself can cause pulmonary fibrosis. Recent studies in mouse models of type 1 and type 2 diabetes demonstrated that diabetes causes pulmonary fibrosis. Both types of diabetes trigger a cascade, starting with increased DNA damage, an impaired DNA repair, and leading to persistent DNA damage signaling. This response, in turn, induces senescence, a senescence-associated-secretory phenotype (SASP), marked by the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors, finally resulting in fibrosis. Restoring DNA repair drives fibrosis into remission, thus proving causality. These data can be translated clinically to patients with type 2 diabetes, characterized by long-term diabetes and albuminuria. Hence there are several arguments, to substitute the term “idiopathic” pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in patients with diabetes (and exclusion of other causes of lung diseases) by the term “diabetes-induced pulmonary fibrosis” (DiPF). However, future studies are required to establish this term and to study whether patients with diabetes respond to the established therapies similar to non-diabetic patients.
Introduction
Current Stage of the “Pneumopathy” as a Potential Diabetic Complication
In 1976, Schuyler et al. published the first paper suggesting that the lung might be a target organ for diabetic complications (1). Since then, many publications have reported the association of type 1 or type 2 diabetes in several pulmonary diseases (2–9). Not surprisingly, there were many conflicting results, potentially explained by the heterogeneous nature of diabetes and its metabolic comorbidities, but also by the different techniques used for characterizing the lung physiology and the basal characteristics of the patient cohort analyzed. Nevertheless, the field has significantly developed overtime. Until now, there is almost no pulmonary disease that has not been brought into the context of diabetes, most recently a more severe course of a SARS-CoV-2 infection (Box 1) (34). More importantly, despite reduced alveolar gas exchange in patients with type 2 diabetes (35, 36), a clinically proven accelerated decline in lung function in diabetic patients (37–42), the pathologically proven abnormalities of alveolar capillaries and the role of pulmonary autonomic dysfunction (35, 43, 44), the issue of diabetes-induced pulmonary dysfunction has not gained the attention it deserves. Since most studies describe an association only, the lack of proven causality thus far precluded the acceptance of the lung as a bonafide target of diabetic complications.
Box 1. Pulmonary diseases potentially associated with diabetes [reviewed in REF. (3)].
● Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (1, 10–13)
● Pulmonary hypertension (23–26)
● More severe course of SARS-CoV2 (30)
● Increased risk of inflammatory lung disease (such as tuberculosis, pneumonia, autoimmune and connective tissue diseases) (31–34)
Similarly, the association with insulin resistance (making a causal relationship even more likely) could not change the oversight of this research area in diabetes, nor did the finding of reduced pulmonary function as a function of increased HbA1c convince the mainstream diabetologists (38, 45). This also holds for the well-known changes in cellular properties, potentially contributing to lung disease in patients with diabetes. Among these, oxidative stress (37, 43), formation of the inflammasome (46), WISP mediated IL-6 dependent proliferation of human lung fibroblasts (47), activation of metalloproteinases (48) and others have been suggested to contribute to lung disease. In this context, accumulation or co-localization of advanced glycation end-products with cell surface RAGE has been described (49). Altogether these might play a role in the accelerated aging of human collagen in diabetes (50). Inflammation, the AGE-RAGE interaction, diabetes-induced platelet-endothelial cell interaction, changes in NOS activation, reduced NO bioavailability, activation of the JAK/STAT pathway, and release of growth factors have been described to occur in diabetes (36). But many of these studies lack a clear demonstration of the cause-effect relationship. Thus, despite a high degree of plausibility, the definite proof of diabetes-related activation of a mechanism causing a specific lung disease is still limited. Therefore, it is not surprising that a recent comment pointed to look deeply into diabetic pneumopathy as a diabetic complication (9).
Reviewing the field of diabetes and lung disease, it becomes evident that there is a large number of exciting data and many clinical observations supporting an important role of the lung as a diabetic target. This is contrasted by the general neglectance of “diabetic pneumopathy” as an important topic in the field: It is hardly presented at diabetes meetings, very rarely in educational sessions on diabetic complications (30, 51). Thus, it is not a generally accepted exciting topic in diabetes research and clinical practice. This might, in part, be due to a large number of observational studies compared to the lower number of studies proving a cause-effect relationship.
Most importantly, from our point of view, the lack of combinatorial studies which involves in vitro, animal-based in vivo models and clinical cohorts, not just limits the understanding but also blocks the deep insights this area, which diabetologists require. However, in one study (5, 52) there is now evidence that hyperglycemia is causatively linked to the onset and progression of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with diabetes, suggesting that these patients should be classified as patients with diabetes-induced pulmonary fibrosis (DiPF).
Requirements for Recognition as a Diabetic Complication
As stated above, the simple association of an increased risk of lung disease in patients with diabetes does not necessarily mean that the lung disease is caused by diabetes. It is well possible that prenatal or early in life injuries prime an individual to develop diabetes and a pulmonary disorder. Similarly, there are various socio-economic factors that directly play an important role in the progression of diabetic complications, which also need to be considered. Thus, neither the sequelae of events nor its correlation can prove causality. Ideally, a study in which patients are divided into two groups, one with good and one with poor glucose control, would give insight into a causal relationship. However, if an agent such as insulin, known to potentially affect lung function (3, 53–55), is used for treatment, the endogenous effects of insulin might outweigh the impact of better glucose control. Given this difficulty and the lack of an intervention study with the prime goal of studying the effect of glucose control by insulin or oral glucose-lowering drugs, other criteria are needed to establish a certain disease as a complication caused by diabetes.
The criteria used in this review include: (i) The clinical association shown in more than one study, (ii) the similarity in type 1 and type 2 diabetes, (iii) the proof of a cause-effect relationship in animal models of type 1 and type 2 diabetes, which includes its reversibility by interference with an assumed pathogenic mechanism and if possible, and (iv) the translation of the in vitro data and experimental diabetes findings into the human situation. The following part of this review will determine whether this holds in the case of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The reader might decide, whether there are sufficient data to state that there is diabetes-induced pulmonary fibrosis (DiPF).
Clinical Aspects, Diabetes Treatment and Their Cross Implications on Lung
Several of the drugs used in the treatment of diabetic complications have been described to affect lung function. For example, metformin has been associated with increased survival rates in patients with lung cancer and pulmonary inflammation, including radiation pneumonitis (56, 57), and reduced exacerbations of asthma (58, 59). In contrast, some studies point to an association of insulin use with lung cancer (53, 54), an increased risk of asthma (60), and alveolar microangiopathy (61). One study showed a protective role of glibenclamide in asthma development (62), GLP-1 agonists a decreased COPD exacerbation and reduced mortality (63), and SGLT-2 inhibitors may induce pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell relaxation (64).Therefore, substantial open questions remain concerning the beneficial or detrimental effects of the drugs used to treat diabetes on lung function.
Diagnosis and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a term used for patients in whom pulmonary fibrosis is diagnosed. However, none of the well-known etiologies explaining the development of fibrosis can be found (61). The problem starts with the difficulties in diagnosis, since different diagnostic criteria have been suggested by other investigators and organizations (65, 66). The main point of discussion was whether subtle histopathological differences between usual or nonspecific interstitial pneumonia should be used for the differentiation of distinct disease entities, since different diseases with defined etiologies may result in the same histological picture. Therefore, others state that IPF is a chronic, progressive and irreversible lung disease of unknown origin (51, 67). IPF is now accepted to be caused by genetic and environmental risk factors with repetitive local micro-injuries to the alveolar epithelium (61), leading to aberrant epithelial-fibroblast communications and a myofibroblast-dependent thickening of matrix and remodeling of lung interstitium (68, 69).
Based on radiological and histological criteria, IPF is diagnosed by the identification of a pattern of interstitial pneumonia in patients without evidence of an alternative cause (51, 66, 68–70). Thus, the exclusion of other diseases is a challenge for the clinician. Furthermore, several other illnesses linked to IPF have similar appearances in x-ray and CT scans. This includes asbestosis, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, connective tissue diseases, drug toxicity and others. A careful patient history covering its exposition to environmental challenges, medications, socio-economic factors, and symptoms for cardiac disease could play an important role in diagnosis. In addition to clinical symptoms, such as breathlessness, a reduced six-minute-walking test, lung function tests including bodyplethysmography, diffusion capacity measurements combined with a multi-detector CT scan and maybe spiroergometry or bronchoalveolar lavage and lung biopsy, might help to make the correct diagnosis (51, 66, 70–74). The clinical course of patients with IPF is heterogeneous, with a median survival of 2.5-3.5 years post-diagnosis (68, 69). Many different mechanisms potentially leading to IPF have been described, and it includes steady inflammation, genetic and environmental interactions leading to epithelial injury, changes in the unfolded protein response, absence of type 1 pneumocytes, differentiation of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts, activation of matrix metalloproteinases, changes in angiogenesis, and maladaptive repair (65, 68, 69, 75). Since all of these mechanisms are observed during the course of type 1 and type 2 diabetes, it is plausible to study the association of pulmonary fibrosis with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Pulmonary Fibrosis in Patients With Diabetes
Several studies have reported an association of type 1 and type 2 diabetes with restrictive lung disease and pulmonary fibrosis (2–5, 7, 10, 11, 23, 76–79). While several authors found a decline in lung function in patients with diabetes (38–42), this does not yet prove that this decline is due to pulmonary fibrosis. In 1990, Lange and coworkers found that during a 5-year observation period, that the forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity declined faster in patients with type 2 diabetes (39), which was supported by the ARIC study (79). Enomoto et al. calculated that the adjusted odds ratio for IPF due to smoking was 5.4, while it was almost the same, namely 4.06 for diabetes (61), suggesting that diabetes may be an independent risk factor for IPF. This fits well with several studies showing that the prevalence of diabetes among patients with IPF is higher than in the general population or in other lung diseases (7, 10, 18, 76, 80–82). The meta-analysis by Vanden Borst et al. (8) provided clear evidence of an association between diabetes and restrictive lung disease, probably fibrosis. The relation of pulmonary fibrosis to type 1 diabetes became likely because restrictive lung disease was correlated with diabetic nephropathy (61), known to be associated with renal fibrosis.
Furthermore, a relation to glycemic control was observed in type 1 diabetes. A study from Korea showed that metabolic syndrome increased the odds ratio for restrictive lung disease (diagnosed by FVC<80%, FEV1/FVC<0,7) to 1.4 (83), indicating that not only type 1 diabetes but even early stages of type 2 diabetes, affect the lung. An association of HbA1c with a restrictive spiroergometric pattern (61) supported the view that restrictive lung disease is a diabetic complication. Besides, patients with diabetes and restrictive lung disease have a worse prognosis (67, 84). A recent study shed additional light on this topic by using a combined approach of clinical symptoms, clinical tests, including a six-minute-walking-test, comprehensive lung function tests, and high-resolution CT, as well as histology in patients with type 2 diabetes (5). In this cross-sectional study, 48 non-diabetic patients, 68 patients with prediabetes, 29 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, and 110 patients with long-term diabetes were thoroughly examined for metabolism, all known diabetic complications, but also for clinical parameters, such as breathlessness and 6-minute walking test. Some patients underwent a multidetector computed tomography, and in some patients, histology was also performed. The study showed that breathlessness in combination with restrictive lung disease was found in 9% of the patients with prediabetes, 20% of patients with newly diagnosed diabetes, and 27% of patients with long-term type 2 diabetes (Figure 1A).
Figure 1 Clinical characterization of diabetic patients with restrictive lung disease. (A) Percentages of patients with restrictive lung disease shown in bar graphs according to group [as shown (5)]. (B) Calculated odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval for restrictive lung disease plotted on x-axis for selected clinical parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria as compared to non-diabetic patients [modified as described earlier (5)].T2D, type 2 diabetes; OR, odds ratio.
Most importantly, the presence of albuminuria increased the risk for restrictive lung disease (OR 8.57) as compared to non-diabetic patients (Figure 1B). Multidetector computed tomography confirmed interstitial lung disease, and histological analysis confirmed the presence of increased alveolar septal fibrosis. There was a relation between clinical symptoms and the severity of lesions observed in CT scans. However, there was no typical or uniform morphological appearance in this small series of CT scans since two patients had subtle and mild intra- or interlobular reticulations, other sub-pleural intralobular reticulations, and ground-glass opacities. In contrast, the patient with the most severe clinical symptoms showed marked sub-pleural intralobular reticulation. Recently, one study with a follow-up of three years was published (61). Here, the decline of lung function in 3 years was not significantly higher in patients with type 2 diabetes than in non-diabetic patients. Furthermore, having more patients studied, the progression of clinical symptoms (breathlessness and 6-minute walking test) correlated well to the CT scan. Of note, even in this more extensive series, no diabetes-specific CT scan pattern could be detected. Thus, more comprehensive studies involving diabetic patients with IPF, but excluding those with other pulmonary and/or cardiac disease, are needed to determine whether there exist any diabetes-specific signatures in high-resolution CT scans of diabetic patients with IPF.
Overall, both studies together strongly suggest to systematically study diabetic patients for pulmonary fibrosis. This includes a detailed history, the 6-minute-walking-test, and, if indicated, a multi-detector high-resolution CT scan (Box 2). These data make it very likely that diabetes is indeed responsible for developing pulmonary fibrosis, especially since markers of glycemic control were predictive of a declining lung function in this study. Whilst the data are convincing for patients with type 2 diabetes, studies using clinical, functional, and CT scans are missing for type 1 diabetes. For the final proof, a randomized controlled study of poor and intensified glycemic control patients with type 1 diabetes with insulin and patients with type 2 diabetes using oral anti-hyperglycemic drugs is required. It would help to learn more about the assumed pulmonary side effects of insulin. However, at the moment, the likelihood of this kind of study is relatively low. As long as such a clinical study is lacking, animal studies will have to provide the final proof of the existence of DiPF.
Box 2. Work up and indication for work up.
Patients with:
● Long-standing diabetes and/or albuminuria
● Breathlessness and exclusion of cardiac disease (NT-pro-BNP, cardiac ultrasound, exclusion of coronary heart disease) or other known lung diseases (e.g. pneumoconiosis, extrinsic allergic alveolitis, Radiation-induced lung injury)
● 6-minute-walking-test with a reached distance below 400 meters (normal persons would reach between 700-800 meters) (85)
● Increased dyspnea during the walking test (quantified by using the modified BORG-scale ranging from 0 to 10) (86)
● Suspect lung function testing with reduced forced vital capacity (FVC) <80%, reduced total lung capacity in bodyplethysmography (TLC-B) <80%, and reduced single breath diffusion capacity (SB-DLCO) <80% in the presence of normal or increased Tiffineau-index (FEV1/VC) (71, 87, 88).
Socio-Economic Consideration in Diabetes-Associated IPF Diagnosis
Like other infectious diseases, the onset and progression of diabetic complications are directly influenced by the socio-economic status of the patients. Among the common socio-economic factors, such as education level, income and occupation are directly linked to diabetic complications (89–91). Persistent ignorance or poor understanding of future complications is also linked to early school dropouts and the premature onset of late-stage complications (89, 90). However, such detailed studies have yet not been described in the context of diabetic lung fibrosis. Still, in several studies, it has been shown that low socio-economic groups are mostly associated with insufficient health care facilities and shows an inverse relationship to lung fibrosis, asthma, pulmonary hypertension and other chronic respiratory diseases to the socio-economic status. Thus current scenario of diabetic complications needs a comprehensive investigation by pairing the socio-economic factors to the onset of diabetic pneumopathy.
Pathophysiological Studies and Experimental Diabetes Models
Several studies in mice and rats have shown that in models of type 1 or type 2 diabetes, pulmonary fibrosis is prominently evident. The first study, published in 1979, showed streptozotocin (STZ)-mediated changes in lysyl-oxidases (92). Later studies in diabetic rats demonstrated the appearance of pulmonary fibrosis and, most importantly, for the support of diabetes-induced pulmonary fibrosis, they demonstrated in STZ treated mice an almost complete normalization of lung fibrosis by insulin treatment (93). This directly indicates that hyperglycemia causes pulmonary fibrosis, which extends our view on DiPF from an association to a causative effect of diabetes. This is seen in STZ treated mice. But since STZ is an agent known to have pro-inflammatory and DNA damaging effects, it is important that similar effects are also observed in different models, such as the OVE26 transgenic mouse, which develops diabetes without the addition of a toxin and can be kept without insulin administration (94). The fact that pulmonary fibrosis was not only seen in mice and rats but also in diabetic cats (95) makes it likely that these findings are not attributed to artefacts of animal models but rather confirmed and bona fide complications of diabetes (96, 97).
Thus, reversibility by glucose control and appearance of pulmonary fibrosis in various animal models and various species makes a strong point for the existence of DiPF. However, one fact is still missing, namely, the detailed description of a pathogenic mechanism, which stops or even reverses pulmonary fibrosis in an animal model and at the same time also exists in patients with diabetes. Aging is also a risk factor for IPF, and it is not surprising that cellular senescence plays a role in fibrotic pulmonary disease (98). Furthermore, several signaling pathways such as PI3-Akt, VEGF signaling, TGF-ß, and Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathways have been shown to be activated in IPF (61). Senescence is intrinsically linked to the so called senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), which involves secretion of growth factors and cytokines, chemokines, and matrix remodelling proteases (98–113). Thus, these senescent cells severely affect their closest environment and systemically the whole organ by its anti-proliferative and pro-inflammatory fibrosis promoting paracrine milieu (104, 111, 114–116). In several animal models, senescence has been shown to be directly responsible for the development of fibrosis (Figure 2).
Figure 2 Diabetes-associated persistent DSB signaling, senescence and SASPs modulates the normal repair of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Diabetes-associated perturbed cellular metabolism is cumulatively linked to diabetic pneumopathy. Elevation of ROS, disturbed NAD+/NADH equilibrium, and non-specific modifications of active biomolecules affect the integrity of the genome and the kinetics of DNA repair. The absence of timely DNA repair activates persistent DNA damage signaling, followed by an irreversible cell cycle arrest, cellular senescence and senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). The SASP releases various pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1α/β, IL-6, IL-8, TGF-β, ICAM, Mcp1 & TNF-α. These cytokines act autocrine and paracrine by altering the cellular homeostasis to maladaptive genetic transformations resulting in severe inflammation and organ fibrosis. The cytokines released from the SASP zone, such as IL-6, IL-8 and TGF-β, activate the fibrotic program via the JAK-STAT pathway. Therefore, the accumulated ECM compromises the functional integrity of diabetic lungs and transforms the parenchymal organ to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
A Conjunction of DNA Damage Response and Senescence in DiPF
Senescence-promoting mechanisms trigger fibrosis, while senescence-inhibiting strategies, including the use of “senolytic drugs”, inhibit fibrosis. This leads to the question of the signals triggering senescence and SASP. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most cytotoxic forms of DNA lesions, eliciting a complex series of events classified as DNA-damage- response (DDR), and leading either to error-free homologous recombination repair (HRR) or error-prone non-homologous end-joining repair (NHEJ) (117). HRR requires extensive nucleolytic processing of broken DNA ends, generating single strand DNA-tails (118, 119). In this region, the so-called DNA-damage sensor complex forms, consisting of a protein called Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-products (RAGE) (111, 120–124), an enzyme MRE11, and its cofactors Rad50 and Nbs1 (119). This complex then helps to convert the exonuclease activity of MRE11 to the required endonuclease activity (111). In the absence of timely generation of an endonucleolytic activity of MRE11, SASP inflammation and fibrosis occurs (104, 115, 116, 125). The important role of RAGE as a cell surface receptor promoting diabetic complications has been described previously (125–128). When RAGE is expressed at the cell surface, it can bind as a pattern recognition receptor not only AGE´s, but also other pro-inflammatory mediators, such as S100 proteins and HMGB1 (129). Binding RAGE triggers a cascade of pro-inflammatory reactions, contributing to late diabetic complications. However, the lung is strikingly different from other organs, such as skin. Therefore, it more directly encounters the environmental challenges, thus constitutively expresses large amounts of nuclear RAGE (130–132). Loss of RAGE impairs pulmonary repair mechanisms, which altogether promotes pulmonary fibrosis (111, 129, 133, 134). This is not surprising since other pattern recognition receptors are also involved in DNA repair (133, 135, 136).
Nuclear RAGE and DNA Repair in Persistent DNA Damage Signaling
Nuclear RAGE is part of the DNA-damage sensor complex and recruits to the site of DNA damage via an ATM signaling cascade. At the site of damage, it interacts with the DNA end-resection complex MRN (MRE11, Nbs1 and Rad50). RAGE modulates the end-processing activity of MRE11 from an unwarranted exo- to an endo-nuclease. This explains why RAGE-/- mice suffer from increased senescence, SASP, pulmonary fibrosis, and reduction of lung function (111). Most importantly for the topic of pulmonary fibrosis, reconstitution of RAGE restores DNA DSBs repair, thus reverses pulmonary fibrosis, in part, by promoting efficient RPA2 and CHK1 phosphorylation, required for efficient DNA repair and prevention of senescence (111). In the absence of nuclear and timely phosphorylated RAGE, DSBs signaling can orchestrate the cascade leading via senescence and SASP to fibrosis.
These findings shed new light on the mechanisms leading to pulmonary fibrosis in patients with diabetes (99). The health risks of the Western lifestyle reflect the net result of defective defense and repair, affecting many organs, including the lung (137, 138). In diabetes, genotoxic reactive metabolites such as ROS and dicarbonyls challenges DNA integrity and repair (5, 52, 139–145).The ultimate proof that impaired DNA repair is leading to diabetic complications was missing, but its association with diabetic complications has been shown in several studies (77, 143, 146–151). Since most diabetic complications, including in the kidney, are associated with fibrosis, it was likely that increased DNA damage and impaired DNA repair lead to a persistent DNA damage response, senescence, SASP, and fibrosis. Recently, we have shown that exposure of human alveolar type-II cells (but also other cell types) to reducing carbohydrates, such as glucose, ribose, and fructose, known to be associated with increased ROS formation (123, 140), impair the repair of DSBs repair in the presence of etoposide. The reduction of the DNA repair, especially the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair pathway, correlated with the reducing capacity of the carbohydrates used. Central to this impairment of the DNA repair capacity was the reducing sugar-triggered change in the NAD+/NADH ratio, shifting the equilibrium towards a decreased NAD+ and increased NADH cofactor pool required for the activity of SIRT and PARP, two important players in the NHEJ repair (152). In the presence of high glucose, the addition of NAD+ disrupted the interaction of PARP1 with its inhibitor Dbc-1, thus making PARP1 available for DNA repair. Therefore, reducing sugars impair the NHEJ repair, leading to a DNA damage response, senescence, SASP, and fibrosis. This was also demonstrated in an experimentaltype1diabetesmodel and supported by db/db mice data. Diabetes was associated with increased activation of the DSBs repair pathway, including an increase in oxidative stress, a shift in the NAD+/NADH-ratio, senescence, SASP, pulmonary and renal fibrosis.
An AAV-driven expression system for RAGE, which exclusively results in nuclear expression of RAGE, reduces the DNA damage response-driven cascade causing renal and pulmonary fibrosis in experimental diabetes. Most interestingly, while fibrosis was reduced, there was no effect on albuminuria, indicating that microangiopathy and organfibrosis is not causally connected. Since one of the requirements to accept the term DiPF is the similarity of events found in mice and humans. DNA damage response, the extent of senescence, and SASP were also studied in humans with type 2 diabetes (61). Overall, recent data have established that markers of this cascade are excellent predictors of DiPF, not only in a cross-sectional study but also in a prospective three years study (61). Thus, the cascade leading to the persistent DNA damage response, senescence, SASP, and fibrosis occurs not only in experimental diabetes but similarly in diabetic patients.
May we use the term DiPF?
The evidence that pulmonary fibrosis is a bona fide diabetic complication is based on the following arguments:
1. Various animal species develop pulmonary fibrosis.
2. Pulmonary fibrosis is seen in experimental type 1 and type 2diabetes.
3. The prevalence of pulmonary fibrosis is higher in humans with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
4. In humans, the decline of lung function and the presence of pulmonary fibrosis are linked to glycemic control.
5. In experimental diabetes, glucose control alleviates the degree of pulmonary fibrosis.
6. The DNA damage driven cascade leading to senescence, SASP, and fibrosis can be observed in experimental diabetes as well as in humans.
7. At least in experimental diabetes, restoring DNA repair not only stops but rather reverses DiPF.
A prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial to prove the role of glucose control for the development and progression of pulmonary fibrosis in type 1 and type 2 diabetes has yet to be conducted. However, the evidence presented above argues for the existence of DiPF as a bonafide diabetic complication.
Open Questions
There are many open questions, which require intensive research. This includes a better description of the natural course of DiPF, the characterization of the patients with rapid progression, the differences between type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and of course, the study of therapeutic options: For example, is physical exercise as effective in patients with diabetes as in non-diabetic patients with IPF (153, 154)? Which drugs can be used, and are their effects and side-effects similar in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, as in non-diabetic patients? Based on the patho-mechanisms described above, which strategies can be used to improve and maintain DNA repair or is the repair capacity entirely genetically determined and cannot be subject to treatment (143)?
Outlook
This review has collected evidence for the existence of diabetes-induced pulmonary fibrosis as a bona fide diabetic complication. Thus, DiPF should obtain the same attention as other complications of the kidney, eye, nerve, vessel, and heart. Therefore, more intense training of clinicians in the history and diagnosis of DiPF warrants its inclusion into educational sessions, textbooks, IPF and national, as well as international diabetes association guidelines.
Author Contributions
SK, VK and TF researched data for the article. SK, VK, ZK, TF, SH and PPN contributed substantially to discussion of the content. PPN and VK wrote the article. SK VK and ZH created the final figures. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript before submission.
Funding
This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1118 & GRK 1874-DIAMICOM), DZD and the Helmholtz Cross Program Topic Metabolic Dysfunction and the Foundation for Diabetes Research.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We also thank all members of our group for their support.
Abbreviations
DSB, double-strand-break; ICAM, intercellular adhesion molecule; IL-1β, interleukin-1 beta; IL-8, interleukin-8; NAD+/NADH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; ROS, reactive-oxygen-species; SASP, senescence-associated-secretory phenotype; TGF-β, Transforming growth factor beta; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha.
References
1. Schuyler MR, Niewoehner DE, Inkley SR, Kohn R. Abnormal Lung Elasticity in Juvenile Diabetes Mellitus. Am Rev Respir Dis (1976) 113(1):37–41. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1976.113.1.37
2. Goldman MD. Lung Dysfunction in Diabetes. Diabetes Care (2003) 26(6):1915–8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.6.1915
3. Khateeb J, Fuchs E, Khamaisi M. Diabetes and Lung Disease: A Neglected Relationship. Rev Diabetes Stud (2019) 15:1–15. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2019.15.1
4. Pitocco D, Fuso L, Conte EG, Zaccardi F, Condoluci C, Scavone G, et al. The Diabetic Lung–a New Target Organ? Rev Diabetes Stud (2012) 9(1):23–35. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2012.9.23
5. Kopf S, Groener JB, Kender Z, Fleming T, Brune M, Riedinger C, et al. Breathlessness and Restrictive Lung Disease: An Important Diabetes-Related Feature in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Respiration (2018) 96(1):29–40. doi: 10.1159/000488909
6. Rohling M, Pesta D, Markgraf DF, Strassburger K, Knebel B, Burkart V, et al. Metabolic Determinants of Impaired Pulmonary Function in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes (2018) 126(9):584–9. doi: 10.1055/a-0653-7135
7. Klein OL, Krishnan JA, Glick S, Smith LJ. Systematic Review of the Association Between Lung Function and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Med (2010) 27(9):977–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03073.x
8. van den Borst B, Gosker HR, Zeegers MP, Schols AM. Pulmonary Function in Diabetes: A Metaanalysis. Chest (2010) 138(2):393–406. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2622
9. Kumar V, Nawroth PP. Is the Association Between Diabetes Mellitus and Pulmonary Fibrosis Real? Nat Rev Endocrinol (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41574-021-00577-z
10. Enomoto T, Usuki J, Azuma A, Nakagawa T, Kudoh S. Diabetes Mellitus may Increase Risk for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Chest (2003) 123(6):2007–11. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.6.2007
11. Kim YJ, Park JW, Kyung SY, Lee SP, Chung MP, Kim YH, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: The National Survey in Korea From 2003 to 2007. J Korean Med Sci (2012) 27(7):756–60. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.7.756
12. Gribbin J, Hubbard R, Smith C. Role of Diabetes Mellitus and Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux in the Aetiology of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Respir Med (2009) 103(6):927–31. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.11.001
13. Oldham JM, Collard HR. Comorbid Conditions in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Recognition and Management. Front Med (Lausanne) (2017) 4:123. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00123
14. Fabbri LM, Luppi F, Beghe B, Rabe KF. Complex Chronic Comorbidities of COPD. Eur Respir J (2008) 31(1):204–12. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00114307
15. Kinney GL, Black-Shinn JL, Wan ES, Make B, Regan E, Lutz S, et al. Pulmonary Function Reduction in Diabetes With and Without Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Diabetes Care (2014) 37(2):389–95. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1435
16. Mannino DM, Thorn D, Swensen A, Holguin F. Prevalence and Outcomes of Diabetes, Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease in COPD. Eur Respir J (2008) 32(4):962–9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00012408
17. Putcha N, Drummond MB, Wise RA, Hansel NN. Comorbidities and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Prevalence, Influence on Outcomes, and Management. Semin Respir Crit Care Med (2015) 36(4):575–91. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1556063
18. Ehrlich SF, Quesenberry CP Jr, Van Den Eeden SK, Shan J, Ferrara A. Patients Diagnosed With Diabetes are at Increased Risk for Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Pulmonary Fibrosis, and Pneumonia But Not Lung Cancer. Diabetes Care (2010) 33(1):55–60. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0880
19. Stene LC, Nafstad P. Relation Between Occurrence of Type 1 Diabetes and Asthma. Lancet (2001) 357(9256):607–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04067-8
20. Yeryomenko GV. The Dependence of the Endothelial Function on Comorbid States in Patients With Asthma. Wiad Lek (2018) 71(2 pt 1):329–32.
21. Yu H, Yang J, Xiao Q, Lu Y, Zhou X, Xia L, et al. Regulation of High Glucose-Mediated Mucin Expression by Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 in Human Airway Epithelial Cells. Exp Cell Res (2015) 333(1):127–35. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.02.007
22. Koskela HO, Salonen PH, Romppanen J, Niskanen L. A History of Diabetes But Not Hyperglycaemia During Exacerbation of Obstructive Lung Disease has Impact on Long-Term Mortality: A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study. BMJ Open (2015) 5(1):e006794. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006794
23. Abernethy AD, Stackhouse K, Hart S, Devendra G, Bashore TM, Dweik R, et al. Impact of Diabetes in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension. Pulm Circ (2015) 5(1):117–23. doi: 10.1086/679705
24. Benson L, Brittain EL, Pugh ME, Austin ED, Fox K, Wheeler L, et al. Impact of Diabetes on Survival and Right Ventricular Compensation in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Pulm Circ (2014) 4(2):311–8. doi: 10.1086/675994
25. Gomez A, Bialostozky D, Zajarias A, Santos E, Palomar A, Martinez ML, et al. Right Ventricular Ischemia in Patients With Primary Pulmonary Hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol (2001) 38(4):1137–42. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01496-6
26. Benbassat CA, Stern E, Kramer M, Lebzelter J, I. Blum and G, et al. Pulmonary Function in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus. Am J Med Sci (2001) 322(3):127–32. doi: 10.1097/00000441-200109000-00003
27. Sona MF, Myung SK, Park K, Jargalsaikhan G. Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Risk of Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Jpn J Clin Oncol (2018) 48(5):426–33. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyy047
28. Shieh SH, Probst JC, Sung FC, Tsai WC, Li YS, Chen CY. Decreased Survival Among Lung Cancer Patients With Co-Morbid Tuberculosis and Diabetes. BMC Cancer (2012) 12:174. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-174
29. Yang X, Liu Y, Mani H, Olson J, Clawson G, Caruso C, et al. Biologic Evaluation of Diabetes and Local Recurrence in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Pathol Oncol Res (2017) 23(1):73–7. doi: 10.1007/s12253-016-0086-1
30. Bornstein SR, Rubino F, Khunti K, Mingrone G, Hopkins D, Birkenfeld AL, et al. Practical Recommendations for the Management of Diabetes in Patients With COVID-19. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2020) 8(6):546–50. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30152-2
31. Travis WD, Costabel U, Hansell DM, King TE Jr., Lynch DA, Nicholson AG, et al. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Update of the International Multidisciplinary Classification of the Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2013) 188(6):733–48. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201308-1483ST
32. Cottin V, Hirani NA, Hotchkin DL, Nambiar AM, Ogura T, Otaola M, et al. Presentation, Diagnosis and Clinical Course of the Spectrum of Progressive-Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases. Eur Respir Rev (2018) 27(150). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0076-2018
33. Choi WI, Hirani NA, Hotchkin DL, Nambiar AM, Ogura T, Otaola M, et al. Risk Factors for Interstitial Lung Disease: A 9-Year Nationwide Population-Based Study. BMC Pulm Med (2018) 18(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0660-2
34. Fischer A, Antoniou KM, Brown KK, Cadranel J, Corte TJ, du Bois RM, et al. An Official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society Research Statement: Interstitial Pneumonia With Autoimmune Features. Eur Respir J (2015) 46(4):976–87. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00150-2015
35. Guvener N, Tutuncu NB, Akcay S, Eyuboglu F, Gokcel A. Alveolar Gas Exchange in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Endocr J (2003) 50(6):663–7. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.50.663
36. Jagadapillai R, Rane MJ, Lin X, Roberts AM, Hoyle GW, Cai L, et al. Diabetic Microvascular Disease and Pulmonary Fibrosis: The Contribution of Platelets and Systemic Inflammation. Int J Mol Sci (2016) 17(11). doi: 10.3390/ijms17111853
37. Kolahian S, Leiss V, Nurnberg B. Diabetic Lung Disease: Fact or Fiction? Rev Endocr Metab Disord (2019) 20(3):303–19. doi: 10.1007/s11154-019-09516-w
38. Davis WA, Knuiman M, Kendall P, Grange V, Davis TM, Fremantle Diabetes S. Glycemic Exposure is Associated With Reduced Pulmonary Function in Type 2 Diabetes: The Fremantle Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care (2004) 27(3):752–7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.3.752
39. Lange P, Groth S, Mortensen J, Appleyard M, Nyboe J, Schnohr P, et al. Diabetes Mellitus and Ventilatory Capacity: A Five Year Follow-Up Study. Eur Respir J (1990) 3(3):288–92.
40. Antonelli Incalzi R, Fuso L, Pitocco D, Basso S, Trove A, Longobardi A, et al. Decline of Neuroadrenergic Bronchial Innervation and Respiratory Function in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Longitudinal Study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev (2007) 23(4):311–6. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.688
41. Weiss SR, Cheng SL, Kourides IA, Gelfand RA, Landschulz WH, Inhaled Insulin Phase IISG. Inhaled Insulin Provides Improved Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled With Oral Agents: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Intern Med (2003) 163(19):2277–82. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.19.2277
42. Skyler JS, Weinstock RS, Raskin P, Yale JF, Barrett E, Gerich JE, et al. Use of Inhaled Insulin in a Basal/Bolus Insulin Regimen in Type 1 Diabetic Subjects: A 6-Month, Randomized, Comparative Trial. Diabetes Care (2005) 28(7):1630–5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.7.1630
43. Forgiarini LA Jr., Kretzmann NA, Porawski M, Dias AS, Marroni NA. Experimental Diabetes Mellitus: Oxidative Stress and Changes in Lung Structure. J Bras Pneumol (2009) 35(8):788–91. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37132009000800011
44. Villa MP, Cacciari E, Bernardi F, Cicognani A, Salardi S, Zapulla F. Bronchial Reactivity in Diabetic Patients. Relationship to Duration of Diabetes and Degree of Glycemic Control. Am J Dis Child (1988) 142(7):726–9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1988.02150070040021
45. Lawlor DA, Ebrahim S, Smith GD. Associations of Measures of Lung Function With Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes: Findings From the British Women’s Heart and Health Study. Diabetologia (2004) 47(2):195–203. doi: 10.1007/s00125-003-1310-6
46. Sayan M, Mossman BT. The NLRP3 Inflammasome in Pathogenic Particle and Fibre-Associated Lung Inflammation and Diseases. Part Fibre Toxicol (2016) 13(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12989-016-0162-4
47. Klee S, Lehmann M, Wagner DE, Baarsma HA, Konigshoff M. WISP1 Mediates IL-6-Dependent Proliferation in Primary Human Lung Fibroblasts. Sci Rep (2016) 6:20547. doi: 10.1038/srep20547
48. Pardo A, Cabrera S, Maldonado M, Selman M. Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in the Pathogenesis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Respir Res (2016) 17:23. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0343-6
49. Soulis T, Thallas V, Youssef S, Gilbert RE, McWilliam BG, Murray-McIntosh RP, et al. Advanced Glycation End Products and Their Receptors Co-Localise in Rat Organs Susceptible to Diabetic Microvascular Injury. Diabetologia (1997) 40(6):619–28. doi: 10.1007/s001250050725
50. Hamlin CR, Kohn RR, Luschin JH. Apparent Accelerated Aging of Human Collagen in Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes (1975) 24(10):902–4. doi: 10.2337/diab.24.10.902
51. Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, Martinez FJ, Behr J, Brown KK, et al. An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Statement: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Evidence-Based Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2011) 183(6):788–824. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2009-040GL
52. Kopf S, Nawroth PP. Diabetic Pulmopathy: A New Clinical Challenge for Diabetology. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes (2018) 126(9):590–1. doi: 10.1055/a-0715-2743
53. Jiang J, Ren HY, Geng GJ, Mi YJ, Liu Y, Li N, et al. Oncogenic Activity of Insulin in the Development of non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma. Oncol Lett (2018) 15(1):447–52. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7347
54. Liu J, Jia Y, Jia L, Li T, Yang L, Zhang G. MicroRNA 615-3p Inhibits the Tumor Growth and Metastasis of NSCLC via Inhibiting Igf2. Oncol Res (2019) 27(2):269–79. doi: 10.3727/096504018X15215019227688
55. Zhou J, Wang J, Zeng Y, Zhang X, Hu Q, Zheng J, et al. Implication of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in IGF1R-Induced Resistance to EGFR-TKIs in Advanced non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Oncotarget (2015) 6(42):44332–45. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6293
56. Xin WX, Fang L, Fang QL, Zheng XW, Ding HY, Huang P. Effect of Hypoglycemic Agents on Survival Outcomes of Lung Cancer Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis. Med (Baltimore) (2018) 97(9):e0035. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010035
57. Patkee WR, Carr G, Baker EH, Baines DL, Garnett JP. Metformin Prevents the Effects of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa on Airway Epithelial Tight Junctions and Restricts Hyperglycaemia-Induced Bacterial Growth. J Cell Mol Med (2016) 20(4):758–64. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12784
58. Hitchings AW, Lai D, Jones PW, Baker EH. Metformin in Severe Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Thorax (2016) 71(7):587–93. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-208035
59. Li CY, Erickson SR, Wu CH. Metformin Use and Asthma Outcomes Among Patients With Concurrent Asthma and Diabetes. Respirology (2016) 21(7):1210–8. doi: 10.1111/resp.12818
60. Viardot A, Grey ST, Mackay F, Chisholm D. Potential Antiinflammatory Role of Insulin via the Preferential Polarization of Effector T Cells Toward a T Helper 2 Phenotype. Endocrinology (2007) 148(1):346–53. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0686
61. Maher TM, Wells AU, Laurent GJ. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Multiple Causes and Multiple Mechanisms? Eur Respir J (2007) 30(5): 835–9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00069307.
62. El-Naa MM, El-Refaei MF, Nasif WA, Abduljawad SH, El-Brairy AI, El-Readi MZ. In-Vivo Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Rosiglitazone, a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma (PPAR-Gamma) Agonists in Animal Model of Bronchial Asthma. J Pharm Pharmacol (2015) 67(10):1421–30. doi: 10.1111/jphp.12445
63. Viby NE, Isidor MS, Buggeskov KB, Poulsen SS, Hansen JB, Kissow H. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Reduces Mortality and Improves Lung Function in a Model of Experimental Obstructive Lung Disease in Female Mice. Endocrinology (2013) 154(12):4503–11. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-1666
64. Han Y, Cho YE, Ayon R, Guo R, Youssef KD, Pan M, et al. SGLT Inhibitors Attenuate NO-Dependent Vascular Relaxation in the Pulmonary Artery But Not in the Coronary Artery. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol (2015) 309(9):L1027–36. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00167.2015
65. Maher TM, Wells AU, Laurent GJ. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Multiple Causes and Multiple Mechanisms? Eur Respir J (2007) 30(5):835–9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00069307
66. American Thoracic, S, S. European Respiratory. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Consensus Classification of the Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias. This Joint Statement of the American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) was Adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, June 2001 and by the ERS Executive Committee, June 2001. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2002) 165(2):277–304. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.165.2.ats01
67. Warth M, Kolb FJ. Impact of Comorbidities on Mortality in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. PLoS One (2016) 11(3):e0151425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151425
68. Richeldi L, Collard HR, Jones MG. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Lancet (2017) 389(10082):1941–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30866-8
69. King TE Jr, Pardo A, Selman M. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Lancet (2011) 378(9807):1949–61. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60052-4
70. American Thoracic Society. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Diagnosis and Treatment. International Consensus Statement. American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2000) 161(2 Pt 1):646–64. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.2.ats3-00
71. Robinson PD, Latzin P, Verbanck S, Hall GL, Horsley A, Gappa M, et al. Consensus Statement for Inert Gas Washout Measurement Using Multiple- and Single- Breath Tests. Eur Respir J (2013) 41(3):507–22. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00069712
72. Butland RJ, Pang J, Gross ER, Woodcock AA, Geddes DM. Two-, Six-, and 12-Minute Walking Tests in Respiratory Disease. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) (1982) 284(6329):1607–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6329.1607
73. Bokov P, Delclaux C. [Interpretation and Use of Routine Pulmonary Function Tests: Spirometry, Static Lung Volumes, Lung Diffusion, Arterial Blood Gas, Methacholine Challenge Test and 6-Minute Walk Test]. Rev Med Interne (2016) 37(2):100–10. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2015.10.356
74. Kishaba T, Nagano H, Nei Y, Yamashiro S. Clinical Characteristics of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients According to Their Smoking Status. J Thorac Dis (2016) 8(6):1112–20. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.03.89
75. Gulati S, Thannickal VJ. The Aging Lung and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am J Med Sci (2019) 357(5):384–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2019.02.008
76. Sandler M. Is the Lung a ‘Target Organ’ in Diabetes Mellitus? Arch Intern Med (1990) 150(7):1385–8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.150.7.1385
77. Yang J, Xue Q, Miao L, Cai L. Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Possible Diabetic Complication. Diabetes Metab Res Rev (2011) 27(4):311–7. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.1175
78. Oh IH, Park JH, Lee CH, Park JS. The Association of Normal Range Glycated Hemoglobin With Restrictive Lung Pattern in the General Population. PLoS One (2015) 10(2):e0117725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117725
79. Yeh HC, Punjabi NM, Wang NY, Pankow JS, Duncan BB, Cox CE, et al. Cross-Sectional and Prospective Study of Lung Function in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Diabetes Care (2008) 31(4):741–6. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1464
80. Abramowitz S, Leiner GC, Small MJ. Chronic Respiratory Diseases and Diabetes. Rev Allergy (1969) 23(12):972–7.
81. Cooper ME, El-Osta A. Epigenetics: Mechanisms and Implications for Diabetic Complications. Circ Res (2010) 107(12):1403–13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.223552
82. Anandhalakshmi S, Manikandan S, Ganeshkumar P, Ramachandran C. Alveolar Gas Exchange and Pulmonary Functions in Patients With Type II Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Diagn Res (2013) 7(9):1874–7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6550.3339
83. Paek YJ, Jung KS, Hwang YI, Lee KS, Lee DR, Lee JU. Association Between Low Pulmonary Function and Metabolic Risk Factors in Korean Adults: The Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey. Metabolism (2010) 59(9):1300–6. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2009.12.005
84. Hyldgaard C, Hilberg O, Muller A, Bendstrup E. A Cohort Study of Interstitial Lung Diseases in Central Denmark. Respir Med (2014) 108(5):793–9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.09.002
85. Enright PL, Sherrill DL. Reference Equations for the Six-Minute Walk in Healthy Adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (1998) 158(5 Pt 1):1384–7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.5.9710086
86. Akisik E, Yazici H, Dalay N. ARLTS1, MDM2 and RAD51 Gene Variations are Associated With Familial Breast Cancer. Mol Biol Rep (2011) 38(1):343–8. doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-0113-3
87. Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, Crapo RO, Burgos F, Casaburi R, et al. Interpretative Strategies for Lung Function Tests. Eur Respir J (2005) 26(5):948–68. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00035205
88. Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, Baur X, Hall GL, Culver BH, et al. Multi-Ethnic Reference Values for Spirometry for the 3-95-Yr Age Range: The Global Lung Function 2012 Equations. Eur Respir J (2012) 40(6):1324–43. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00080312
89. Tol A, Sharifirad G, Shojaezadeh D, Tavasoli E, Azadbakht L. Socio-Economic Factors and Diabetes Consequences Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. J Educ Health Promot (2013) 2:12. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.108009
90. De Silva AP, De Silva SH, Haniffa R, Liyanage IK, Jayasinghe KS, Katulanda P, et al. A Survey on Socioeconomic Determinants of Diabetes Mellitus Management in a Lower Middle Income Setting. Int J Equity Health (2016) 15:74. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0363-3
91. Fano V, Pezzotti P, Gnavi R, Bontempi K, Miceli M, Pagnozzi E, et al. The Role of Socio-Economic Factors on Prevalence and Health Outcomes of Persons With Diabetes in Rome, Italy. Eur J Public Health (2013) 23(6):991–7. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks168
92. Kalhan R, Tran BT, Colangelo LA, Rosenberg SR, Liu K, Thyagarajan B, et al. Systemic Inflammation in Young Adults is Associated With Abnormal Lung Function in Middle Age. PLoS One (2010) 5(7):e11431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011431
93. Ofulue AF, Kida K, Thurlbeck WM. Experimental Diabetes and the Lung. I. Changes in Growth, Morphometry, and Biochemistry. Am Rev Respir Dis (1988) 137(1):162–6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/137.1.162
94. Carlson EC, Audette JL, Veitenheimer NJ, Risan JA, Laturnus DI, Epstein PN. Ultrastructural Morphometry of Capillary Basement Membrane Thickness in Normal and Transgenic Diabetic Mice. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol (2003) 271(2):332–41. doi: 10.1002/ar.a.10038
95. Mexas AM, Hess RS, Hawkins EC, Martin LD. Pulmonary Lesions in Cats With Diabetes Mellitus. J Vet Intern Med (2006) 20(1):47–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2006.tb02822.x
96. Parker JC, Townsley MI. Evaluation of Lung Injury in Rats and Mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol (2004) 286(2):L231–46. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00049.2003
97. Lamb CR, Jones ID. Associations Between Respiratory Signs and Abnormalities Reported in Thoracic CT Scans of Cats. J Small Anim Pract (2016) 57(10):561–7. doi: 10.1111/jsap.12530
98. Schafer MJ, White TA, Iijima K, Haak AJ, Ligresti G, Atkinson EJ, et al. Cellular Senescence Mediates Fibrotic Pulmonary Disease. Nat Commun (2017) 8:14532. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14532
99. Kumar V, Agrawal R, Pandey A, Kopf S, Hoeffgen M, Kaymak S, et al. Compromised DNA Repair is Responsible for Diabetes-Associated Fibrosis. EMBO J (2020) 39(11):e103477. doi: 10.15252/embj.2019103477
100. Armanios MY, Chen JJ, Cogan JD, Alder JK, Ingersoll RG, Markin C, et al. Telomerase Mutations in Families With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. N Engl J Med (2007) 356(13):1317–26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066157
101. d’Adda di Fagagna F, Reaper PM, Clay-Farrace L, Fiegler H, Carr P, Von Zglinicki T, et al. A DNA Damage Checkpoint Response in Telomere-Initiated Senescence. Nature (2003) 426(6963):194–8. doi: 10.1038/nature02118
102. Toussaint O, Royer V, Salmon M, Remacle J. Stress-Induced Premature Senescence and Tissue Ageing. Biochem Pharmacol (2002) 64(5-6):1007–9. doi: 10.1016/S0006-2952(02)01170-X
103. Narita M, Narita M, Krizhanovsky V, Nunez S, Chicas A, Hearn SA, et al. A Novel Role for High-Mobility Group a Proteins in Cellular Senescence and Heterochromatin Formation. Cell (2006) 126(3):503–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.052
104. Rodier F, Coppe JP, Patil CK, Hoeijmakers WA, Munoz DP, Raza SR, et al. Persistent DNA Damage Signalling Triggers Senescence-Associated Inflammatory Cytokine Secretion. Nat Cell Biol (2009) 11(8):973–9. doi: 10.1038/ncb1909
105. Freund A, Orjalo AV, Desprez PY, Campisi J. Inflammatory Networks During Cellular Senescence: Causes and Consequences. Trends Mol Med (2010) 16(5):238–46. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2010.03.003
106. O’Driscoll M. Diseases Associated With Defective Responses to DNA Damage. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (2012) 4(12). doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012773
107. Cheresh P, Kim SJ, Tulasiram S, Kamp DW. Oxidative Stress and Pulmonary Fibrosis. Biochim Biophys Acta (2013) 1832(7):1028–40. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.11.021
108. Chilosi M, Carloni A, Rossi A, Poletti V. Premature Lung Aging and Cellular Senescence in the Pathogenesis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and COPD/Emphysema. Transl Res (2013) 162(3):156–73. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2013.06.004
109. Tchkonia T, Zhu Y, van Deursen J, Campisi J, Kirkland JL. Cellular Senescence and the Senescent Secretory Phenotype: Therapeutic Opportunities. J Clin Invest (2013) 123(3):966–72. doi: 10.1172/JCI64098
110. Povedano JM, Martinez P, Flores JM, Mulero F, Blasco MA. Mice With Pulmonary Fibrosis Driven by Telomere Dysfunction. Cell Rep (2015) 12(2):286–99. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.028
111. Kumar V, Fleming T, Terjung S, Gorzelanny C, Gebhardt C, Agrawal R, et al. Homeostatic Nuclear RAGE-ATM Interaction is Essential for Efficient DNA Repair. Nucleic Acids Res (2017) 45(18):10595–613. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx705
112. Schafer MJ, Haak AJ, Tschumperlin DJ, LeBrasseur NK. Targeting Senescent Cells in Fibrosis: Pathology, Paradox, and Practical Considerations. Curr Rheumatol Rep (2018) 20(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s11926-018-0712-x
113. Rivera B, Polak P, Foulkes WD. Monogenic Diseases of DNA Repair. N Engl J Med (2018) 378(5):491. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1716072
114. Yan Z, Kui Z, Ping Z. Reviews and Prospectives of Signaling Pathway Analysis in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Autoimmun Rev (2014) 13(10):1020–5. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2014.08.028
115. Oubaha M, Miloudi K, Dejda A, Guber V, Mawambo G, Germain MA, et al. Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype Contributes to Pathological Angiogenesis in Retinopathy. Sci Transl Med (2016) 8(362):362ra144. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf9440
116. d’Adda di Fagagna F. Living on a Break: Cellular Senescence as a DNA-Damage Response. Nat Rev Cancer (2008) 8(7):512–22. doi: 10.1038/nrc2440
117. Awasthi P, Foiani M, Kumar A. ATM and ATR Signaling at a Glance. J Cell Sci (2015) 128(23):4255–62. doi: 10.1242/jcs.169730
118. Ira G, Pellicioli A, Balijja A, Wang X, Fiorani S, Carotenuto W, et al. DNA End Resection, Homologous Recombination and DNA Damage Checkpoint Activation Require CDK1. Nature (2004) 431(7011):1011–7. doi: 10.1038/nature02964
119. Cannavo E, Cejka P. Sae2 Promotes dsDNA Endonuclease Activity Within Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 to Resect DNA Breaks. Nature (2014) 514(7520):122–5. doi: 10.1038/nature13771
120. Brett J, Schmidt AM, Yan SD, Zou YS, Weidman E, Pinsky D, et al. Survey of the Distribution of a Newly Characterized Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products in Tissues. Am J Pathol (1993) 143(6):1699–712.
121. Vlassara H, Bucala R, Striker L. Pathogenic Effects of Advanced Glycosylation: Biochemical, Biologic, and Clinical Implications for Diabetes and Aging. Lab Invest (1994) 70(2):138–51.
122. Abel M, Ritthaler U, Zhang Y, Deng Y, Schmidt AM, Greten J, et al. Expression of Receptors for Advanced Glycosylated End-Products in Renal Disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant (1995) 10(9):1662–7.
123. Muller-Krebs S, Kihm LP, Zeier B, Gross ML, Deppisch R, Wieslander A, et al. Renal Toxicity Mediated by Glucose Degradation Products in a Rat Model of Advanced Renal Failure. Eur J Clin Invest (2008) 38(5):296–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2008.01945.x
124. Bucciarelli LG, Kaneko M, Ananthakrishnan R, Harja E, Lee LK, Hwang YC, et al. Receptor for Advanced-Glycation End Products: Key Modulator of Myocardial Ischemic Injury. Circulation (2006) 113(9):1226–34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.575993
125. Bierhaus A, Humpert PM, Morcos M, Wendt T, Chavakis T, Arnold B, et al. Understanding RAGE, the Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products. J Mol Med (Berl) (2005) 83(11):876–86. doi: 10.1007/s00109-005-0688-7
126. Isermann B, Bierhaus A, Humpert PM, Rudofsky G, Chavakis T, Ritzel R, et al. AGE-RAGE: A Hypothesis or a Mechanism? Herz (2004) 29(5):504–9. doi: 10.1007/s00059-004-2611-3
127. Bierhaus A, Stern DM, Nawroth PP. RAGE in Inflammation: A New Therapeutic Target? Curr Opin Investig Drugs (2006) 7(11):985–91.
128. Bierhaus A, Humpert PM, Stern DM, Arnold B, Nawroth PP. Advanced Glycation End Product Receptor-Mediated Cellular Dysfunction. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2005) 1043:676–80. doi: 10.1196/annals.1333.077
129. Chavakis T, Bierhaus A, Al-Fakhri N, Schneider D, Witte S, Linn T, et al. The Pattern Recognition Receptor (RAGE) is a Counterreceptor for Leukocyte Integrins: A Novel Pathway for Inflammatory Cell Recruitment. J Exp Med (2003) 198(10):1507–15. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030800
130. Stopper H, Schinzel R, Sebekova K, Heidland A. Genotoxicity of Advanced Glycation End Products in Mammalian Cells. Cancer Lett (2003) 190(2):151–6. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(02)00626-2
131. Mallidis C, Agbaje I, Rogers D, Glenn J, McCullough S, Atkinson AB, et al. Distribution of the Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products in the Human Male Reproductive Tract: Prevalence in Men With Diabetes Mellitus. Hum Reprod (2007) 22(8):2169–77. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem156
132. Chen CY, Abell AM, Moon YS, Kim KH. An Advanced Glycation End Product (AGE)-Receptor for AGEs (RAGE) Axis Restores Adipogenic Potential of Senescent Preadipocytes Through Modulation of P53 Protein Function. J Biol Chem (2012) 287(53):44498–507. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.399790
133. Kutikhin AG, Yuzhalin AE, Tsitko EA, Brusina EB. Pattern Recognition Receptors and DNA Repair: Starting to Put a Jigsaw Puzzle Together. Front Immunol (2014) 5:343. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00343
134. Englert JM, Hanford LE, Kaminski N, Tobolewski JM, Tan RJ, Fattman CL, et al. A Role for the Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am J Pathol (2008) 172(3):583–91. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070569
135. Narayanaswamy PB, Tkachuk S, Haller H, Dumler I, Kiyan Y. CHK1 and RAD51 Activation After DNA Damage is Regulated via Urokinase Receptor/TLR4 Signaling. Cell Death Dis (2016) 7(9):e2383. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.291
136. Harberts E, Gaspari AA. TLR Signaling and DNA Repair: Are They Associated? J Invest Dermatol (2013) 133(2):296–302. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.288
137. Maynard S, Fang EF, Scheibye-Knudsen M, Croteau DL, Bohr VA. DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Aging, and Neurodegeneration. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med (2015) 5(10). doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a025130
138. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Buklijas T, Low FM, Beedle AS. Epigenetic Mechanisms That Underpin Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2009) 5(7):401–8. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2009.102
139. Aagaard-Tillery KM, Grove K, Bishop J, Ke X, Fu Q, McKnight R, et al. Developmental Origins of Disease and Determinants of Chromatin Structure: Maternal Diet Modifies the Primate Fetal Epigenome. J Mol Endocrinol (2008) 41(2):91–102. doi: 10.1677/JME-08-0025
140. Lorenzi M, Montisano DF, Toledo S, Barrieux A. High Glucose Induces DNA Damage in Cultured Human Endothelial Cells. J Clin Invest (1986) 77(1):322–5. doi: 10.1172/JCI112295
141. Blasiak J, Arabski M, Krupa R, Wozniak K, Zadrozny M, Kasznicki J, et al. DNA Damage and Repair in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Mutat Res (2004) 554(1-2):297–304. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.05.011
142. Tatsch E, Bochi GV, Piva SJ, De Carvalho JA, Kober H, Torbitz VD, et al. Association Between DNA Strand Breakage and Oxidative, Inflammatory and Endothelial Biomarkers in Type 2 Diabetes. Mutat Res (2012) 732(1-2):16–20. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2012.01.004
143. Bhatt S, Gupta MK, Khamaisi M, Martinez R, Gritsenko MA, Wagner BK, et al. Preserved DNA Damage Checkpoint Pathway Protects Against Complications in Long-Standing Type 1 Diabetes. Cell Metab (2015) 22(2):239–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.07.015
144. Palmer AK, Tchkonia T, LeBrasseur NK, Chini EN, Xu M, Kirkland JL. Cellular Senescence in Type 2 Diabetes: A Therapeutic Opportunity. Diabetes (2015) 64(7):2289–98. doi: 10.2337/db14-1820
145. Burton DGA, Faragher RGA. Obesity and Type-2 Diabetes as Inducers of Premature Cellular Senescence and Ageing. Biogerontology (2018) 19(6):447–59. doi: 10.1007/s10522-018-9763-7
146. Kornum JB, Thomsen RW, Riis A, Lervang HH, Schonheyder HC, Sorensen HT. Type 2 Diabetes and Pneumonia Outcomes: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Diabetes Care (2007) 30(9):2251–7. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2417
147. Ban CR, Twigg SM. Fibrosis in Diabetes Complications: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Circulating and Urinary Markers. Vasc Health Risk Manag (2008) 4(3):575–96. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s1991
148. Honiden S, Gong MN. Diabetes, Insulin, and Development of Acute Lung Injury. Crit Care Med (2009) 37(8):2455–64. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a0fea5
149. Giovannini C, Piaggi S, Federico G, Scarpato R. High Levels of Gamma-H2AX Foci and Cell Membrane Oxidation in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes. Mutat Res (2014) 770:128–35. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2014.08.005
150. Tornovsky-Babeay S, Dadon D, Ziv O, Tzipilevich E, Kadosh T, Schyr-Ben Haroush R, et al. Type 2 Diabetes and Congenital Hyperinsulinism Cause DNA Double-Strand Breaks and P53 Activity in Beta Cells. Cell Metab (2014) 19(1):109–21. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.11.007
151. Russo I, Frangogiannis NG. Diabetes-Associated Cardiac Fibrosis: Cellular Effectors, Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities. J Mol Cell Cardiol (2016) 90:84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.12.011
152. Canto C, Sauve AA, Bai P. Crosstalk Between Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase and Sirtuin Enzymes. Mol Aspects Med (2013) 34(6):1168–201. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2013.01.004
153. Vainshelboim B, Oliveira J, Fox BD, Soreck Y, Fruchter O, Kramer MR. Long-Term Effects of a 12-Week Exercise Training Program on Clinical Outcomes in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Lung (2015) 193(3):345–54. doi: 10.1007/s00408-015-9703-0
Keywords: diabetes, pulmonary fibrosis, senescence, persistent DNA damage signaling, hyperglycemia
Citation: Kopf S, Kumar V, Kender Z, Han Z, Fleming T, Herzig S and Nawroth PP (2021) Diabetic Pneumopathy–A New Diabetes-Associated Complication: Mechanisms, Consequences and Treatment Considerations. Front. Endocrinol. 12:765201. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.765201
Received: 26 August 2021; Accepted: 22 October 2021;
Published: 25 November 2021.
Edited by:
Hans Ulrich Häring, University of Tübingen, GermanyReviewed by:
Baptist Gallwitz, University of Tübingen, GermanyMartin Hrabě De Angelis, Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher Forschungszentren (HZ), Germany
Copyright © 2021 Kopf, Kumar, Kender, Han, Fleming, Herzig and Nawroth. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Peter P. Nawroth, cGV0ZXIubmF3cm90aEBtZWQudW5pLWhlaWRlbGJlcmcuZGU=
†These authors have contributed equally to this work