Comparison of Cumulative Live Birth Rate Between Aged PCOS Women and Controls in IVF/ICSI Cycles

The present study aimed to assess whether women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) ≥35 years age undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles experienced a higher cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) over a two-year period compared with age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched patients with tubal factor infertility. Through propensity score matching (PSM) approach, the authors retrospectively analyzed the IVF/ICSI outcomes of 263 PCOS patients (35-46 years of age [mean, 37 years]) and 526 age- and BMI-matched tubal factor controls two years after oocyte retrieval. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to explore factors influencing cumulative live birth. Women with PCOS exhibited better ovarian reserve and response, and higher CLBR in two years compared with age- and BMI-matched controls (CLBR: 55.51% in PCOS vs. 38.02% in control, p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the number of transferable embryos and antral follicle counts were both significant independent factors predicting cumulative live birth after adjusting for female age, female body mass index, percentage of transferred blastocysts, number of embryos transferred per embryo-transfer cycle, diagnosis of PCOS and freeze-all cycles (p<0.001, p=0.045). Women with PCOS ≥ 35 years of age demonstrated a higher CLBR over two years compared with age- and BMI-matched controls. This could be explained by favorable oocyte reserve and more available embryos compared with controls, which overcome the compromised oocyte quality in aged PCOS patients.

1 Introduction

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder that affects approximately 6%-10% of reproductive-age women (1). Ovulation abnormalities cause infertility in women with PCOS, while other factors, including metabolic morbidities, obesity, hyperandrogenism and high luteinizing hormone(LH) levels, increase the complexity of the problem (2–4). Modern society has witnessed women postponing marriage and childbearing. However, the fecundity of women declines with age. Although assisted reproductive technology(ART) has helped to increase pregnancy rates (5), continuous attrition of oocytes, compromised oocyte quality and cumulative adverse reproductive tract factors inevitably limit the success of ART in women ≥ 35 years of age (3). Therefore, the fecundity of women with PCOS ≥ 35 years of age undergoing IVF is a notable concern.

Despite its heterogeneity in phenotype and morbidity, women with PCOS appear to have an advantage in ovarian reserve. The median density of small preantral follicles has been reported to be six-fold greater in biopsies from polycystic ovaries in anovulatory women than in normal ovaries (6). Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is mainly secreted by the granulosa cells of preantral and small antral follicles 5-8mm in diameter (7). Because the concentration of serum AMH is proportional to the number of developing follicles in the ovaries, it is considered to be a marker of ovarian reserve and ageing of ovaries (8). Serum AMH levels and antral follicle counts (AFCs) in women with PCOS are significantly higher than those of age-matched controls (9). These remain until the age at onset of perimenopause, in addition to lower serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels compared with controls (10).

Abundant ovarian reserve in women with PCOS has a corresponding ovarian response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation during in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles (11). Whether the advantages of ovarian reserve in the PCOS population leads to success in live births in aged individuals is controversial. A meta-analysis concluded that women with PCOS achieved similar clinical pregnancy and live birth rate (LBR) per started IVF cycle as normo-ovulatory women (11). A retrospective cohort study reported that oocytes retrieved and LBR remained stable in the PCOS group, but decreased in age-matched controls across the age range of 22-41 years (12). A large-scale study reported that women with PCOS had an increased number of oocytes retrieved, clinical pregnancy rate and LBR until 40 years of age compared with controls, although similar declines in clinical pregnancy rate and LBR with age were detected in both groups (13).

These studies, however, focused only on fresh cycles. With the development of embryo cryopreservation technology, embryos can be well-preserved, thawed and transferred to the uterus after ovary recovery and previous preparation of the endometrium. Therefore, consideration of an overall LBR in fresh and frozen cycles of embryo transfer (ET) after each oocyte retrieval is significant and comprehensive, especially in women ≥ 35 years of age in their eager desire to have children. Studies investigating cumulative live births in PCOS patients ≥35 years of age undergoing IVF-ET are scarce. One comparative analysis reported that women with isolated polycystic ovary morphology (PCOM), instead of PCOS, had a higher cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) than controls (14). Favorable ovarian reserve in PCOS individuals ≥ 35 years of age is obvious. However, whether this advantage leads to a better LBR and CLBR remains uncertain. Therefore we used propensity score matching (PSM) approach, to compare the LBRs and CLBRs of IVF/ICSI cycles within two years of follow-up, in infertile PCOS patients ≥ 35 years of age and age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls.

2 Material and Methods

2.1 Study Population

Patients ≥ 35 years of age who underwent undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle between January 1, 2014 and August 31, 2017, at the Center for Reproductive Medicine in Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital (Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China) were retrospectively identified in the institutional database. A total of 263 patients with PCOS and 1789 with tubal factors as the single underlying cause of infertility were included. The diagnosis of PCOS was based on the 2003 Rotterdam consensus (15), with at least two out of the following three conditions and exclusion of other etiologies (congenital adrenal hyperplasia, androgen-secreting tumors and Cushing’s syndrome): oligo- or anovulation; clinical and/or biochemical signs of hyperandrogenism; and polycystic ovaries. Individuals with a history of ovarian surgery, genital tumors, other endocrine disorders, endometriosis or uterine malformations were excluded.

The initial control group (n=1789) differed greatly from patients with PCOS in both age and BMI (age: median, 36 years [interquartile rage, 35,38] in PCOS group vs. median, 38[interquartile rage, 36,40] in control group, p<0.001). To reduce confounding bias between the groups and to attain a convincing result, a PSM approach was used. Propensity scores were calculated using logistic regression based on female age and BMI using the nearest neighbor random matching algorithm. PSM was performed at a ratio of 1:2. Demographic data, cycle information, reproductive outcomes and clinical features were compared between the groups.

This study was approved by the Human Research and Ethics Committee of the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained for IVF/ICSI process.

2.2 Stimulation Protocols for IVF

Ovarian stimulation was performed using gonadotropin (Gn)-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist long protocol or GnRH antagonist protocol. Ovarian stimulation and IVF-ET were performed as previously described (16).

2.2.1 GnRH Agonist Long Protocol

Pituitary downregulation in the midluteal phase of the menstrual cycle was achieved by intramuscular (i.m.) injection of 0.75-1.25 mg long-acting GnRHa (IPSEN, Paris, France), or daily administration (i.m.) of 0.05-0.1 mg short-acting GnRHa (IPSEN, Paris, France) until the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) administration. Two to three weeks later, vaginal ultrasound and blood hormone tests (FSH, LH, estradiol [E2]) were performed to evaluate the complete downregulation of the pituitary gland. Once these results were confirmed, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) was initiated with Gn 75U - 300 U/day, while dosage was determined according to individual BMI, basal hormone levels and AFC. Evaluation of follicular growth was performed using vaginal ultrasound and blood hormone tests every three to five days, and adjustment of Gn dosage was performed when necessary. HCG (Livon, China) 4000 U to 10,000 U was administered to induce oocyte maturation, when at least one follicle ≥ 18mm or three follicles ≥17 mm in diameter. Transvaginal oocyte retrieval was performed 36 to 38 h after the HCG trigger, under the guidance of vaginal ultrasound.

2.2.2 GnRH Antagonist Protocol

After evaluation of follicular condition according to blood hormone tests (FSH, LH, E2) and vaginal ultrasound, Gn 75 U to 300  U/day was administered to stimulate follicular growth. Follicular development was evaluated using vaginal ultrasound and blood hormone tests every three to five days, and Gn dosage adjusted when necessary. GnRH antagonist was added on the fifth to seventh day after Gn stimulation began (i.e., fixed protocol), or according to the size of the dominant follicle and LH level (i.e., flexible protocol). HCG (Livon, China) 4000 U to 10,000 U or GnRHa (IPSEN) 0.2 mg was administered to induce oocyte maturation, when at least one follicle ≥18 mm or three follicles ≥ 17 mm in diameter. Oocyte recovery was performed 36 - 38 h after the trigger.

2.3 Embryo Scoring and Embryo Transfer

Embryos were scored according to morphology assessment described by the Istanbul Consensus. Cleavage stage embryos scored grade 1 and day 5 blastocysts scored grade 3 or grade 4 were considered to be good-quality embryos.

In fresh cycles, embryos were cultured in-vitro until the third to fifth day after oocyte retrieval, and transferred to the uterus, with a maximum of three embryos. Corpus luteal support was provided on the day of oocyte retrieval, with progesterone injections (i.m., 60mg/day) or progesterone capsules (600 mg/day trans-vaginal), until the pregnancy test. If patients exhibited evidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) or were at risk of OHSS (number of oocytes retrieved > 25, or E2 > 4800 ng/ml on HCG day), ET would be canceled and good-quality embryos would be cryopreserved.

In frozen ET (FET) cycles, a maximum of three embryos were placed in the uterus on the third or fifth day after ovulation in natural cycles(NC) or induced ovulation (IO) cycles, or after the beginning of progesterone administration in artificial cycles. Corpus luteal support was administered since ovulation (in NC and IO), or when the endometrium was prepared in artificial cycles, with progesterone injections (i.m., 60 mg/day) or progesterone capsules (600 mg/day trans-vaginal) until pregnancy testing.

2.4 Measurement

A pregnancy test was performed 14 days after ET, with a serumβ- HCG level >5 IU/L considered to be positive. Subsequently, clinical pregnancy was defined as a gestational sac detected on ultrasound four weeks after embryo transfer. Cumulative live births in this study were calculated until two years after ovum pick up, or exhaustion of preserved embryos before two years, including both fresh ET cycles and subsequent FET cycles.

2.5 Statistical Analysis

Data analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 24.0 (SPSS IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). In the present study, non-normally distributed continuous variables are expressed as median (25th quartile, 75th quartile, i.e., interquartile range [IQR]); categorical variables are described as numbers and percentages. Data were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, t-test or chi-squared test, where appropriate. Statistical significance was defined as a two-tailed p-value of 0.05. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine factors predicting CLBR in two years.

3 Results

After PSM at a ratio of 1:2, 263 PCOS patients and 526 tubal factor infertile patients were included in the final analysis.

Data reported in Table 1 show that female age, BMI and male age were comparable between the groups. The PCOS group had a significantly longer duration of infertility (7 years versus vs. 4 years, p<0.001), but better ovarian reserve, with higher AFC (26 vs. 12, p<0.001) and higher serum AMH level (7.48 vs. 2.89 ng/ml, p<0.001) compared with the control group. Infertility type differed between the groups (percentage of primary infertility: 48.67% in the PCOS group vs. 23.95% in the control group, p<0.001). During controlled ovarian stimulation, PCOS patients received a lower initiation Gn dose (150 U vs. 225 U, p<0.001), but they had higher estrogen levels on HCG days (3328 vs. 2725 ng/ml, p<0.001) than controls. Stimulation protocols differed significantly between the PCOS and control groups: GnRH antagonist protocol, 109/263 (41.44%) vs. 110/526 (20.91%), respectively; long GnRH agonist protocol, 154/263 (58.56%) vs. 416/526 (79.09%), respectively (p<0.001). Ovarian response was better in the PCOS group, with a higher number of retrieved oocytes (12 vs. 10, p<0.001). The number of patients who withheld fresh ET due to the risk of OHSS was 44 (16.73%) in the PCOS group and 49 (9.32%) in the control group. Other patients canceled fresh ET due to fever or personal reasons.

TABLE 1

Table 1 Baseline characteristics and ovarian stimulation of PCOS women aged 35 or older and age-, BMI-matched tubal factor controls in IVF/ICSI cycles.

The PCOS group underwent 189 fresh ET cycles (71.86%) with 386 embryos. Among these, 26 cycles (13.76%) were performed with one embryo, 129 cycles (68.25%) with two, and 34 cycles (17.99%) with three, as is shown in Table 2. The control group underwent 369 fresh ET cycles (71.15%) with 710 embryos. Among these, 77 cycles (20.87%) were performed with one embryo, 243 cycles (65.85%) with two, and 49 cycles (13.28%) with three. The proportions of cycles with different numbers of transferred embryos were similar between the PCOS and control groups (p=0.067). Both average number of embryos transferred and percentage of transferred blastocysts were higher in the PCOS group than in control group in fresh ET cycles (mean number of embryos transferred: 2.04 ± 0.56 vs. 1.92 ± 0.58 respectively, p=0.022; percentage of transferred blastocyst: 55/386 [14.25%] in PCOS group vs. 34/710[4.79%] in control group, p<0.001). Pregnancy outcomes are shown in Table 2. Patients with PCOS exhibits higher clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate in fresh ET cycles than controls (clinical pregnancy rate per ET: 106/189[56.08%] in PCOS group vs. 129/369[34.96%] in control group, p<0.001; live birth rate per ET: 84/189[44.44%] vs. 88/369[23.89%], p<0.001). Abortion rates of fresh ET cycles are similar between groups (22/106[20.75%] in PCOS group vs. 40/129[31.01%] in control group, p=0.076).

TABLE 2

Table 2 Pregnancy outcomes of PCOS women aged 35 or older and age-, BMI-matched tubal factor controls in IVF/ICSI cycles.

In the PCOS group, 204 frozen-thawed ET cycles were performed with 411 embryos. Among these, proportions of cycles with one, two or three embryos transferred were 18.14%, 62.25% and 19.61% respectively, as shown in Table 2. The control group underwent 558 frozen-thawed ET cycles with 1123 embryos in total. The proportions of cycles with one, two or three embryos transferred were 23.30%, 52.15% and 24.55% respectively. The control group had a slightly higher average number of embryos transferred than the PCOS group in FET cycles (3.25 ± 1.89 vs. 2.98 ± 1.93, respectively); however, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.054). The PCOS group had a higher percentage of transferred blastocysts than the control group in FET cycles (165/411 [40.15%] vs. 387/1123 [34.46%], respectively, p=0.040). Significant differences were detected in the clinical pregnancy and LBR of FET (clinical pregnancy rate per FET: 86/204 [42.16%] in the PCOS group vs. 169/558 [30.29%] in the control group, p=0.020; LBR per ET: 64/204 [31.37%] vs. 116/558 [20.79%], p=0.002). Abortion rates in FET cycles were comparable between the PCOS and control groups (18/86 [20.93%] vs. 53/169 [31.36%], respectively, p=0.079).

Considering both fresh and FET cycles, the mean number of embryos transferred per ET were similar between the two groups (2.01 ± 0.56 in the control group vs. 2.02 ± 0.51 in the PCOS group, p=0.686). The percentage of transferred blastocysts including fresh and FET cycles, was still higher in the PCOS group than in the control group (27.60% vs. 22.97%, respectively, p=0.011). Overall, CLBR in two years in patients with PCOS was approximately 50% higher than that in patients with tubal factor infertility (146/263 [55.51%] vs. 200/526 [38.02%], respectively, p<0.001).

In the control group, two (0.38%) patients had triplet pregnancies, one of whom gave birth to twins after reduction, and the other experienced spontaneous abortion. Fifty-six (10.64%) patients had twin pregnancies in the control group, thirty-six of whom gave birth to twins, eight experienced miscarriage, and the remaining twelve eventually had single deliveries (two received reduction and ten experienced spontaneous abortion of one fetus). In the PCOS group, all four (1.52%) patients with triplet pregnancies received reduction and achieved one single live birth and three twin live births. Fifty (19.01%) patients had twin pregnancies in the PCOS group, twenty-six of whom gave birth to twins, ten experienced miscarriage and the remaining fourteen had single delivery (four received reduction and ten experienced spontaneous abortion of one fetus).

In multivariate logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for female age, female BMI, percentage of transferred blastocysts, number of embryos transferred per ET cycle, diagnosis of PCOS and freeze-all cycles, number of transferable embryos and AFC were both significant independent factors predicting cumulative live birth in a two-year period (p<0.001) (Table 3).

TABLE 3

Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis for the prediction of 2-year cumulative live birth of women aged 35 or older in IVF/ICSI cycles.

4 Discussion

Results of this study indicated that, compared with age- and BMI-matched tubal factor controls, women with PCOS ≥ 35 years of age maintained better ovarian reserve and response, as well as prominently higher cumulative pregnancy rate and CLBR over two years in IVF/ICSI cycles.

The natural fecundity of women with PCOS was evidenced by the fact that those with both oligo-amenorrhea and hirsutism delivered at least one child as often as non-symptomatic women in a large-scale cohort study (17, 18). Women with PCOS and advanced age who achieve spontaneous pregnancy have also been reported (19). This may be attributed to a relatively good ovarian reserve, despite ageing.

Due to excessive initial recruitment and prolonged survival of follicles (6, 20, 21), polycystic ovaries exhibit a higher density and larger number of follicles compared with normal ovaries (6). In addition, biomarkers of ovarian reserve in women with PCOS are stable, regardless of age. A long-term follow-up study revealed that serum AMH levels and AFC were significantly higher in women with PCOS than in non-PCOS controls, and differences remained beyond 35 years of age, which accords with a lower serum FSH level because rising FSH is considered to be a hormone marker of menopause (9, 10). The decline in AFC in women with PCOS was significantly slower than that in controls (22), and a model based on age-related decline of serum AMH demonstrated that the predicted age of menopause in women with PCOS extended, on average, two years beyond that of normo-ovulatory women (23). Our results also demonstrated that AMH level and AFC in PCOS women ≥ 35 years of age were significantly higher than in controls.

The advantage of ovarian reserve in aging women with PCOS may confer a considerable ovarian response. This was illustrated by the lower total Gn dose, higher E2 level on trigger day, more oocytes retrieved, and larger number of transferable embryos in PCOS women in our study. Adequate oocytes retrieved provides considerable embryos for selection, resulting in pregnancy and LBR. This is consistent with other studies investigating IVF outcomes in those with PCOS and advancing age (12, 13, 24). Mellembakken et al. reported that oocyte count and LBRs in IVF/ICSI remained stable in women with PCOS who were 22-41 years of age, while those in the eumenorrheic comparison group decreased significantly with age (12). In the largest retrospective cohort study, Kalra et al. reported that women with PCOS demonstrated an approximately 20%–30% reproductive advantage in oocytes retrieved, pregnancy rate and LBR over women with tubal factor infertility until 40 years of age (13). However, pregnancy and LBR did not differ for each year after 40 years of age in the two groups. Hwang et al. reported that, when compared in subgroups according to age, pregnancy and LBR remained stable in women with PCOS until 38 years of age, while parameters declined significantly with age in tubal factor controls (24). Results of our study also revealed that women with PCOS exhibited significantly higher clinical pregnancy and LBR than controls in fresh ET cycles (clinical pregnancy rate per ET: 106/189[56.08%] in the PCOS group vs. 129/369[34.96%] in the control group, p<0.001; LBR per ET: 84/189[44.44%] in the PCOS group vs. 88/369[23.89%] in the control group, p<0.001). However, the values of AMH level and AFC in predicting pregnancy outcomes of aged women in IVF cycles remain controversial. Zhang et al. investigated IVF outcomes of women with discrepancies between age and AMH. Their study revealed that the LBR in the older high-AMH group was significantly higher than that in the older low-AMH group, and CLBRs were comparable between the young low-AMH group and the older high-AMH group (25). Dai et al. reported that in women ≥ 37 years of age, rates of implantation, spontaneous miscarriage and livebirth were similar between women with high AMH levels and those with low AMH levels (26).

The advantage of 60%-86% in pregnancy and live birth may, in part, be attributed to the high percentage of blastocysts transferred in fresh cycles in women with PCOS (55/386 [14.25%] in the PCOS group vs. 34/710 [4.79%] in the control group, p<0.001). A Cochrane review summarized low-quality evidence for live births and moderate for clinical pregnancy that fresh blastocyst stage transfer is associated with higher rates than fresh cleavage stage transfer (27). For PCOS patients with moderate risk for OHSS but not meeting the conditions for freeze-all strategy, it is possible that fresh ET would be delayed to D5 to determine whether ET should be canceled depending on the development of OHSS. Furthermore, an adequate number of oocytes retrieved played a major role as providing considerable embryos for both selection and blastocyst culture.

Theoretically, CLBR in aged PCOS patients could benefit from an abundance of oocytes retrieved providing considerable transferable embryos in subsequent frozen-thawed cycles. Paula et al. reported that the cumulative baby take-home rate did not differ between women with PCOS and non-PCOS controls undergoing their first IVF cycles (28). Li et al. compared the outcomes of women with PCOS and isolated polycystic ovaries (PCOs), with age-matched controls undergoing IVF treatment. The results indicated that women in the isolated PCO group, but not the PCOS group, had a significantly higher CLBR per cycle start compared with controls, even though both groups had more oocytes yielded and transferable embryos than controls (14). In addition, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the total number of transferable embryos was the only significant factor predicting cumulative live births after adjusting for age and BMI, instead of the presence of PCOS or isolated PCO feature (14). A similar conclusion was drawn here, as the regression analysis in our study also revealed that the total number of transferable embryos and AFC were significant factors predicting cumulative live birth in two years, after adjusting for female age, BMI, percentage of transferred blastocysts, number of embryos transferred per ET cycle, diagnosis of PCOS and freeze-all cycles.

The discrepancies among studies may be due to the following reasons. First, the population differed across studies, and only individuals ≥ 35 years of age were included in our study. Large-scale retrospective and prospective randomized studies have illustrated that, in fresh IVF cycles, an increasing number of oocytes yielded improved pregnancy and live birth before reaching 15, after which the IVF outcomes worsened (29–31). In contrast, CLBR increased with oocyte number in unselected infertile patients, even after the number of oocytes exceeded 15 (32, 33). Therefore, cumulative live birth was expected in women with PCOS, due to favorable ovary reserve and resultant response, especially in aged women, whose age-matched counterparts experience significant follicle loss with age. Moreover, the fact that aged women with PCOS restore regular menses and experience spontaneous pregnancy indicates possible beneficial changes in fertility (34, 35). A study reported that AMH level and AFC could be used as prognostic indicators in a personalized prediction model of live birth (36).

Second, the heterogeneity of PCOS phenotypes may have different influences on outcomes. De Vos et al. reported that hyperandrogenic PCOS phenotypes have significantly lower CLBRs when compared with normoandrogenic phenotype D (polycystic ovary morphology+ ovulatory dysfunction) and individuals with isolated PCOM ovaries. However, phenotype D has a CLBR similar to that of isolated PCOM ovaries (37). He et al. reported that a subgroup with metabolic syndrome among PCOS infertile patients had fewer retrieved oocytes, fewer available embryos, and a lower oocyte utilization rate compared with PCOS patients without metabolic syndrome in IVF cycles (38). Further regression analysis revealed that the number of embryos transferred and the number of available embryos were positive; however, metabolic syndrome was negatively associated with CLBR. These results resemble hypotheses addressing the compromised oocyte quality of patients with PCOS.

Third, accumulating evidence supports significant and adverse effects of female obesity on IVF outcomes (39), and a similar conclusion has been drawn in the PCOS population (2). Because obesity and overweight are prevalent among individuals with PCOS, our study used PSM method to strictly control for confounding bias caused by both age and BMI (40), which may lead to different conclusions, while counterpart studies have only controlled for age.

Nevertheless, how oocyte quality is affected by aging and PCOS remains unclear. An increase in embryo aneuploidy, dysfunction of mitochondria and loss of cellular polarity are commonly observed in aged women, leading to a decline in oocyte quality and an increase in pregnancy loss in unselected populations (3). Advantages of ovarian reserve do not indicate corresponding oocyte quality in aged PCOS patients. In fact, studies have concluded that endocrine imbalance in PCOS populations, including FSH deficiency, hypersecretion of LH, and hyperandrogenemia, hyperinsulinemia have adverse effects on oocyte maturation, fertilization rates and embryo quality, consequently resulting in impaired pregnancy rates, and increased pregnancy loss (38, 41–43). Dysfunctions of glycerophospholipid metabolism and glycosphingolipid biosynthesis in the follicles of PCOS patients have been reported to be associated with declines in the two pronuclei fertilization rates during IVF procedures (44). Obesity and metabolic syndrome, common among PCOS patients, induce chronic inflammation of oocytes and elevated lipolysis in follicular fluid, thus compromising oocyte quality and ART outcomes in PCOS patients (38, 45–47). Sagvekar et al. also reported epigenetic dysregulation of genes involved in vital ovarian functions in patients with PCOS (48).

However, these results are controversial. A prospective, comparative study demonstrated that the rate of MII and morphologically abnormal oocytes, the percentage of top-quality embryos on day 3 were equivalent in both PCOM and control groups after ICSI (49). Studies have also suggested that PCOS is not associated with embryonic aneuploidy (50, 51). After comparing women with diminished ovarian reserve (age > 40 years), women with premature ovarian aging/occult primary ovarian insufficiency (age < 38 with abnormally low functional ovarian reserve (FOR) by age-specific FSH and/or AMH) and women < 38 years of age with normal ovarian reserve, Gleicher et al. concluded that low androgen levels are associated with diminished FOR at all ages (52). Qin et al. reported that basal T level was a predictor of ovarian response and pregnancy outcomes in women with diminished ovarian reserve (53). Long-term follow-up studies revealed that women with PCOS restored regular menses, experienced improvement in hormone imbalance, and achieved spontaneous pregnancy late in reproductive age (19, 24, 34, 35), which implies that aged women with PCOS may have better ovarian reserve and clinical outcomes undergoing IVF.

Our study was the first to explore CLBR among women with PCOS ≥ 35 year of age compared with age- and BMI-matched controls undergoing IVF/ICSI. However, one limitation of our study was its retrospective design. The percentage of blastocysts transferred can hardly be controlled in retrospective studies as a factor influencing pregnancy outcomes. Future prospective studies, however, may overcome this drawback and yield convincing results. Additionally, we failed to calculate CLBR after all frozen embryos were thawed and transplanted, because most PCOS patients have preserved embryos. In addition, some aged PCOS patients with minor subfertility may achieve pregnancy either spontaneously or with the simple treatment of ovulation induction or intrauterine insemination, as reported in previous studies (18). Selection bias may have influenced our results to some extent. Furthermore, parameters reflecting the quantity of ovarian reserve including AFC, number of retrieved oocytes and transferable embryos do not reflect the quality of oocytes and embryos. Moreover, our results did not include pregnancy complications, while PCOS was reported to be associated with gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and premature delivery (54, 55).

In summary, the results of our study demonstrated that women with PCOS women ≥ 35 years of age had a higher CLBR over a two-year period compared with their age- and BMI-matched controls undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles. It will be interesting for further prospective studies to explore overall CLBR in aged PCOS patients, as well as to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Human Research and Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author Contributions

ZM and ML conceived the study, extracted and analyzed the data. ZM and ML wrote the first draft of the manuscript which was revised by PP, LL, JH, XC, and DY. This study was supervised by XC and DY. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC1001004 and 2016YFC1000205); National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81501224); the grants of Secondary Development Projects of Traditional Chinese Herbal Formula Compound (No. YZB20174002); the Special Fund of Chinese Medical Association for Clinical Research (No. 17020480717); the National Natural Science Youth Fund (No. 81703784); the Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province (No. 2017A020213028); the 5010 grants of Sun Yat-Sen University (No. SYSU2014005).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all participants involved in this study.

References

1. Bozdag G, Mumusoglu S, Zengin D, Karabulut E, Yildiz BO. The Prevalence and Phenotypic Features of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hum Reprod (2016) 31(12):2841–55. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew218

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Bailey AP, Hawkins LK, Missmer SA, Correia KF, Yanushpolsky EH. Effect of Body Mass Index on In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Am J Obstetrics Gynecol (2014) 211(2):163.e1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.035

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Qiao J, Wang ZB, Feng HL, Miao YL, Wang Q, Yu Y, et al. The Root of Reduced Fertility in Aged Women and Possible Therapentic Options: Current Status and Future Perspects. Mol Aspects Med (2014) 38:54–85. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2013.06.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF, Dokras A, Laven J, Moran L, et al. Recommendations From the International Evidence-Based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Hum Reprod (2018) 33(9):1602–18. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey256

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Somigliana E, Paffoni A, Busnelli A, Filippi F, Pagliardini L, Vigano P, et al. Age-Related Infertility and Unexplained Infertility: An Intricate Clinical Dilemma. Hum Reprod (2016) 31(7):1390–6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew066

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Webber LJ, Stubbs S, Stark J, Trew GH, Margara R, Hardy K, et al. Formation and Early Development of Follicles in the Polycystic Ovary. Lancet (2003) 362(9389):1017–21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14410-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Jeppesen JV, Anderson RA, Kelsey TW, Christiansen SL, Kristensen SG, Jayaprakasan K, et al. Which Follicles Make the Most Anti-Mullerian Hormone in Humans? Evidence for an Abrupt Decline in AMH Production at the Time of Follicle Selection. Mol Hum Reprod (2013) 19(8):519–27. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gat024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Dewailly D, Andersen CY, Balen A, Broekmans F, Dilaver N, Fanchin R, et al. The Physiology and Clinical Utility of Anti-Mullerian Hormone in Women. Hum Reprod Update (2014) 20(3):370–85. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt062

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Cui Y, Shi Y, Cui L, Han T, Gao X, Chen ZJ. Age-Specific Serum Antimullerian Hormone Levels in Women With and Without Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Fertil Steril (2014) 102(1):230–6 e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Hudecova M, Holte J, Olovsson M, Sundstrom Poromaa I. Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Reproductive Outcome and Ovarian Reserve. Hum Reprod (2009) 24(5):1176–83. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den482

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Heijnen EM, Eijkemans MJ, Hughes EG, Laven JS, Macklon NS. Fauser BC. A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes of Conventional IVF in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Hum Reprod Update (2006) 12(1):13–21. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmi036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Mellembakken JR, Berga SL, Kilen M, Tanbo TG, Abyholm T, Fedorcsak P. Sustained Fertility From 22 to 41 Years of Age in Women With Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. Hum Reprod (2011) 26(9):2499–504. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der214

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Kalra SK, Ratcliffe SJ, Dokras A. Is the Fertile Window Extended in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome? Utilizing the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry to Assess the Impact of Reproductive Aging on Live-Birth Rate. Fertil Steril (2013) 100(1):208–13. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.055

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Li HW, Lee VC, Lau EY, Yeung WS, Ho PC, Ng EH. Cumulative Live-Birth Rate in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome or Isolated Polycystic Ovaries Undergoing in-Vitro Fertilisation Treatment. J Assisted Reprod Genet (2014) 31(2):205–11. doi: 10.1007/s10815-013-0151-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Rotterdam EA-SPcwg. Revised 2003 Consensus on Diagnostic Criteria and Long-Term Health Risks Related to Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod (2004) 19(1):41–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

16. Lin HY, Li Y, Wang WJ, Qiu Q, Zhang QX, Li Y. Role of the Proportion of Dominant Follicles in Patients With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer. Chin Med J (Engl) (2019) 132(12):1448–53. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000246

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Koivunen R, Pouta A, Franks S, Martikainen H, Sovio U, Hartikainen AL, et al. Fecundability and Spontaneous Abortions in Women With Self-Reported Oligo-Amenorrhea and/or Hirsutism: Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 Study. Hum Reprod (2008) 23(9):2134–9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den136

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. West S, Vahasarja M, Bloigu A, Pouta A, Franks S, Hartikainen AL, et al. The Impact of Self-Reported Oligo-Amenorrhea and Hirsutism on Fertility and Lifetime Reproductive Success: Results From the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966. Hum Reprod (2014) 29(3):628–33. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det437

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Lunde O, Djoseland O, Grottum P. Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Follow-Up Study on Fertility and Menstrual Pattern in 149 Patients 15-25 Years After Ovarian Wedge Resection. Hum Reprod (2001) 16(7):1479–85. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.7.1479

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Webber LJ, Stubbs SA, Stark J, Margara RA, Trew GH, Lavery SA, et al. Prolonged Survival in Culture of Preantral Follicles From Polycystic Ovaries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2007) 92(5):1975–8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-1422

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Das M, Djahanbakhch O, Hacihanefioglu B, Saridogan E, Ikram M, Ghali L, et al. Granulosa Cell Survival and Proliferation Are Altered in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2008) 93(3):881–7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-1650

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Wiser A, Shalom-Paz E, Hyman JH, Sokal-Arnon T, Bantan N, Holzer H, et al. Age-Related Normogram for Antral Follicle Count in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online (2013) 27(4):414–8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Tehrani FR, Solaymani-Dodaran M, Hedayati M, Azizi F. Is Polycystic Ovary Syndrome an Exception for Reproductive Aging? Hum Reprod (2010) 25(7):1775–81. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq088

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Hwang YI, Cha SW, Song IO, Yang KM, Min EG, Kim HO. Fertility of Patients With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization by Age. Int J Gynecol Obstetrics (2016) 135(1):91–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.03.033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Zhang B, Meng Y, Jiang X, Liu C, Zhang H, Cui L, et al. IVF Outcomes of Women With Discrepancies Between Age and Serum Anti-Mullerian Hormone Levels. Reprod Biol Endocrinol (2019) 17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12958-019-0498-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Dai X, Wang Y, Yang H, Gao T, Yu C, Cao F, et al. AMH has No Role in Predicting Oocyte Quality in Women With Advanced Age Undergoing IVF/ICSI Cycles. Sci Rep (2020) 10(1):19750. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76543-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro Retamar AM, Alvarez Sedo CR, Blake D. Cleavage Stage Versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproductive Technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2016) 6):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Kuivasaari-Pirinen P, Hippelainen M, Hakkarainen H, Randell K, Heinonen S. Cumulative Baby Take-Home Rate Among Women With PCOS Treated by IVF. Gynecological Endocrinol Off J Int Soc Gynecological Endocrinol (2010) 26(8):582–9. doi: 10.3109/09513591003632043

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Steward RG, Lan L, Shah AA, Yeh JS, Price TM, Goldfarb JM, et al. Oocyte Number as a Predictor for Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome and Live Birth: An Analysis of 256,381 In Vitro Fertilization Cycles. Fertil Steril (2014) 101(4):967–73. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Briggs R, Kovacs G, MacLachlan V, Motteram C, Baker HW. Can You Ever Collect Too Many Oocytes? Hum Reprod (2015) 30(1):81–7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu272

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Nyboe Andersen A, Nelson SM, Fauser BC, Garcia-Velasco JA, Klein BM, Arce JC, et al. Individualized Versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation for In Vitro Fertilization: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Assessor-Blinded, Phase 3 Noninferiority Trial. Fertil Steril (2017) 107(2):387–96.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Ji J, Liu Y, Tong XH, Luo L, Ma J, Chen Z. The Optimum Number of Oocytes in IVF Treatment: An Analysis of 2455 Cycles in China. Hum Reprod (2013) 28(10):2728–34. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det303

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Drakopoulos P, Blockeel C, Stoop D, Camus M, de Vos M, Tournaye H, et al. Conventional Ovarian Stimulation and Single Embryo Transfer for IVF/ICSI. How Many Oocytes do We Need to Maximize Cumulative Live Birth Rates After Utilization of All Fresh and Frozen Embryos? Hum Reprod (2016) 31(2):370–6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev316

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Elting MW, Korsen TJ, Rekers-Mombarg LT, Schoemaker J. Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Gain Regular Menstrual Cycles When Ageing. Hum Reprod (2000) 15(1):24–8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.1.24

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Schmidt J, Brannstrom M, Landin-Wilhelmsen K, Dahlgren E. Reproductive Hormone Levels and Anthropometry in Postmenopausal Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): A 21-Year Follow-Up Study of Women Diagnosed With PCOS Around 50 Years Ago and Their Age-Matched Controls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2011) 96(7):2178–85. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2959

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Nelson SM, Fleming R, Gaudoin M, Choi B, Santo-Domingo K, Yao M. Antimullerian Hormone Levels and Antral Follicle Count as Prognostic Indicators in a Personalized Prediction Model of Live Birth. Fertil Steril (2015) 104(2):325–32. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. De Vos M, Pareyn S, Drakopoulos P, Raimundo JM, Anckaert E, Santos-Ribeiro S, et al. Cumulative Live Birth Rates After IVF in Patients With Polycystic Ovaries: Phenotype Matters. Reprod Biomed Online (2018) 37(2):163–71. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.05.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. He Y, Lu Y, Zhu Q, Wang Y, Lindheim SR, Qi J, et al. Influence of Metabolic Syndrome on Female Fertility and In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes in PCOS Women. Am J Obstetrics Gynecol (2019) 221(2):138 e1–e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Sermondade N, Huberlant S, Bourhis-Lefebvre V, Arbo E, Gallot V, Colombani M, et al. Female Obesity Is Negatively Associated With Live Birth Rate Following IVF: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hum Reprod Update (2019) 25(4):439–51. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Escobar-Morreale HF. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Definition, Aetiology, Diagnosis and Treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2018) 14(5):270–84. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2018.24

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Wood JR, Dumesic DA, Abbott DH, Strauss JF 3rd. Molecular Abnormalities in Oocytes From Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Revealed by Microarray Analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2007) 92(2):705–13. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-2123

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Dumesic DA, Abbott DH. Implications of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome on Oocyte Development. Semin Reprod Med (2008) 26(1):53–61. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-992925

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Qiao J, Feng HL. Extra- and Intra-Ovarian Factors in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Impact on Oocyte Maturation and Embryo Developmental Competence. Hum Reprod Update (2011) 17(1):17–33. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmq032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Liu L, Yin TL, Chen Y, Li Y, Yin L, Ding J, et al. Follicular Dynamics of Glycerophospholipid and Sphingolipid Metabolisms in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol (2019) 185:142–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.08.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Niu Z, Lin N, Gu R, Sun Y, Feng Y. Associations Between Insulin Resistance, Free Fatty Acids, and Oocyte Quality in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome During In Vitro Fertilization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2014) 99(11):E2269–76. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3942

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Banuls C, Rovira-Llopis S, Martinez de Maranon A, Veses S, Jover A, Gomez M, et al. Metabolic Syndrome Enhances Endoplasmic Reticulum, Oxidative Stress and Leukocyte-Endothelium Interactions in PCOS. Metabolism (2017) 71:153–62. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.02.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Snider AP, Wood JR. Obesity Induces Ovarian Inflammation and Reduces Oocyte Quality. Reproduction (2019) 158(3):R79–90. doi: 10.1530/REP-18-0583

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Sagvekar P, Kumar P, Mangoli V, Desai S, Mukherjee S. DNA Methylome Profiling of Granulosa Cells Reveals Altered Methylation in Genes Regulating Vital Ovarian Functions in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Clin Epigenet (2019) 11(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13148-019-0657-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Sigala J, Sifer C, Dewailly D, Robin G, Bruyneel A, Ramdane N, et al. Is Polycystic Ovarian Morphology Related to a Poor Oocyte Quality After Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation for Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection? Results From a Prospective, Comparative Study. Fertil Steril (2015) 103(1):112–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Weghofer A, Munne S, Chen S, Barad D, Gleicher N. Lack of Association Between Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Embryonic Aneuploidy. Fertil Steril (2007) 88(4):900–5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Wang Q, Luo L, Lei Q, Lin MM, Huang X, Chen MH, et al. Low Aneuploidy Rate in Early Pregnancy Loss Abortuses From Patients With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online (2016) 33(1):85–92. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.04.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Gleicher N, Kim A, Weghofer A, Kushnir VA, Shohat-Tal A, Lazzaroni E, et al. Hypoandrogenism in Association With Diminished Functional Ovarian Reserve. Hum Reprod (2013) 28(4):1084–91. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Qin Y, Zhao Z, Sun M, Geng L, Che L, Chen ZJ. Association of Basal Serum Testosterone Levels With Ovarian Response and In Vitro Fertilization Outcome. Reprod Biol Endocrinol (2011) 9:9. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Palomba S, de Wilde MA, Falbo A, Koster MP, La Sala GB, Fauser BC. Pregnancy Complications in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Hum Reprod Update (2015) 21(5):575–92. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Hu KL, Liu FT, Xu H, Li R, Qiao J. High Antimullerian Hormone Levels are Associated With Preterm Delivery in Patients With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Fertil Steril (2020) 113(2):444–52.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.09.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar