Maternal Diabetes Impairs Insulin and IGF-1 Receptor Expression and Signaling in Human Placenta

Background: Maternal high blood glucose during pregnancy increases the risk for both maternal and fetal adverse outcomes. The mechanisms underlying the regulator effects of hyperglycemia on placental development and growth have not been fully illustrated yet. The placenta expresses high amounts of both insulin receptor (IR) and insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R). It has been reported that the placenta of diabetic women has structural and functional alterations and the insulin/IGF system is likely to play a role in these changes. The aim of the present study was to measure the content of IR and IGF-1R and their phosphorylation in the placenta of women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) or with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) compared to women with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) during pregnancy.

Methods: Placental tissues were obtained from 80 Caucasian women with a singleton pregnancy. In particular, we collected placenta samples from 20 T1D patients, 20 GDM patients and 40 NGT women during pregnancy. Clinical characteristics and anthropometric measures of all women as well as delivery and newborn characteristics were recorded. Patients were also subdivided on the basis of peripartum glycemia either ≥90 mg/dl or <90 mg/dl, regardless of the diagnosis.

Results: In T1D patients, a higher rate of adverse outcomes was observed. Compared to the GDM women, the T1D group showed significantly higher average capillary blood glucose levels at the third trimester of pregnancy and at peripartum, and higher third-trimester HbA1c values. In both T1D and GDM women, HbA1c values during pregnancy correlated with glucose values in the peripartum period (R-squared 0.14, p=0.02). A positive correlation was observed between phosphorylation of placental IR and the glucose levels during the third trimester of GDM and T1D pregnancy (R-squared 0.21, p=0.003). In the placenta of T1D patients, IGF-1R phosphorylation and IR isoform A (IR-A) expression were significantly increased (p=0.006 and p=0.040, respectively), compared to the NGT women. Moreover, IGF-1R phosphorylation was significantly increased (p<0.0001) in the placenta of patients with peripartum glucose >90 mg/dl, while IR-A expression was increased in those with peripartum blood glucose higher than 120 mg/dl (p=0.046).

Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, our study represents the first one in which an increased maternal blood glucose level during pregnancy is associated with an increased IGF-1R phosphorylation and IR-A expression in the placenta. Both these mechanisms can promote an excessive fetal growth.

Introduction

In women with pre-gestational diabetes a good glycemic control before and during pregnancy is essential to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes. Maternal high blood glucose during pregnancy increases the risk of both maternal and fetal/neonatal adverse outcomes. Maternal glucose can cross the placenta (1–5) which, in turn, can send signals into the maternal and fetal circulations. The precise nature of these signals and their regulation in response to glucose changes are still unknown (6). In particular, the mechanisms underlying the regulator effects of hyperglycemia on placental development and growth have not been fully investigated yet. It has been reported that the placenta of diabetic women is less efficient since it presents structural and functional alterations (7) and that the insulin/IGF system is likely to play a role in these changes (8, 9). The placenta expresses high amounts of both IR and IGF-1R, as well as IGF-1 and IGF-2, which appear to be involved in most mechanisms of placental development and function. In pregnant women with T1D or GDM, the insulin/IGF system is, of course, dysregulated and these alterations may influence the release of placental nutrients to the fetus (8, 10, 11). In type 1 diabetic women, a positive correlation between the umbilical cord IGFBP3 and IGF-1 levels and macrosomia (12, 13), and also between maternal glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and umbilical cord IGF-1 and IGF-2 levels, has been found; this latter parameter, in turn, correlates with birth weight (14). An impaired vascular function has been reported in the placenta of diabetic mothers, and this might lead to deleterious consequences for the fetal development and growth as well as for the health of the mother. Placental hypervascularization in diabetic women is mainly attributed to an increased angiogenesis and insulin might play an important modulatory role in human placental endothelial cells. Fetal hyperinsulinemia consequent to maternal hyperglycemia can stimulate endothelial cell proliferation, probably through the IR-A (15). The altered expression of insulin receptor isoforms A and B influences the reduced fetoplacental vascular dilatation in response to insulin observed in GDM (16). In early pregnancy, the insulin receptors are mainly expressed in the syncytiotrophoblast, facing the maternal circulation, while at term, they are mainly expressed in the placental endothelial cells, facing the fetal circulation (17). These findings suggest a different role and effects of insulin in the first trimester, mainly due to the maternal plasma insulin levels, or in term pregnancy, mainly due to fetal plasma levels. Decreased fetal insulin levels result in reduced placental weight, supporting the hypothesis that fetal insulin is a growth factor for the placenta. The use of insulin analogs has improved the possibility of reaching a good metabolic control, but the effects of insulin or its analogs in the structure/function of the placenta (i.e. altered expression of growth factors, altered angiogenesis, etc.), and the consequent effects on fetal development are poorly known (18–21).

Few evidence are available on the post-receptor insulin signaling in the placenta. In animal models, the maternal hyperglycemic environment leads to a decreased ERK and AKT phosphorylation during the placenta development, and consequently, to abnormalities of embryonal developmental (22, 23). It is not clear whether the timing of onset of hyperglycemia, at the beginning (as in T1D) or at the end of pregnancy (as in GDM), differently affects placental development and growth.

The present study aimed to evaluate both the content and activation of IR and IGF-1R in the placenta of T1D patients (having pre-pregnancy hyperglycemia) compared to GDM patients (having hyperglycemia initiated during pregnancy) and to women with normal glucose tolerance during pregnancy. We also evaluated the expression and activation of IR and IGF-1R in the placenta in relationship to the maternal blood glucose during labor and delivery.

Methods

Clinical Study

Placental tissues were obtained from 80 Caucasian women with a singleton pregnancy, selected among patients followed at the Garibaldi-Nesima Medical Center in Catania (Italy), who delivered in the same Hospital and agreed to participate by informed consent.

The studied women included three groups (Table 1):

a. 20 T1D women followed at the Diabetic Center since the pre-conception period (planned pregnancy, n=4) or early gestation (unplanned pregnancy, n=16). These patients were regularly visited by a specialized team (physician, dietitian and nurse) every 1 or 2 weeks according to our established protocol. Glycemic control was evaluated by checking patient’s self-monitoring of blood glucose during each visit and by measuring HbA1c every 1–2 months, depending on the team judgement. Patients with severe overweight (BMI > 27 kg/m²), or not compliant with the visit protocol or with advanced micro- or macro-vascular chronic diabetes complications, were excluded.

b. 20 GDM patients, diagnosed according to the criteria of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (24, 25), and followed, since the GDM diagnosis at the second (n=3) or third (n=17) trimester of pregnancy, according to the same protocol of T1D patients. Women with severe overweight (BMI > 27 kg/m²) or not compliant with the visit protocol were excluded.

c. 40 NGT women during pregnancy, in a 2:1 ratio with the other two groups. Women with severe overweight (BMI > 27 kg/m²) were excluded. The clinical characteristics of NGT pregnant women were extracted from the medical records of the Obstetric Center of our Medical Center.

TABLE 1

Table 1 Clinical and anthropometrical characteristics of the studied population.

The number of the cases was estimated on the basis of the T1D pregnant patients referred to our diabetes center yearly and followed up simultaneously in the gynecology and obstetrics center in the same hospital, in a placenta collection period of about 3 years.

The following data were recorded for each studied subject (Table 1): age, pre-pregnancy BMI, weight gain during gestation, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Moreover, for T1D and GDM patients, data on glycemic control and for T1D onset or progression of diabetes-related micro-vascular complications were obtained by using the albumin/creatinine ratio for nephropathy and ophthalmoscopy for retinopathy (26).

Glycemic control was assessed by capillary blood glucose and HbA1c values. Although the dosage of HbA1c cannot be considered clinically useful in GDM pregnancy (except for the initial assessment of the degree of glycemic control), a study conducted on T1D patients has demonstrated a predictive value of HbA1c on the occurrence of fetal macrosomia or LGA, neonatal hypoglycemia and the time of delivery, even at an advanced stage of gestation (27).

For all cases, the delivery and newborn characteristics were recorded, including neonatal gestational age, length and weight, APGAR scores at 1 and 5 min, Rohrer ponderal index (birth weight g x 100/height in cm³) and blood glucose levels. Placenta weight was also measured (Table 2).

TABLE 2

Table 2 Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

All procedures performed in this study were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

In Vitro Studies

Placental Tissue Preparation

Immediately after delivery, placentas were collected and weighted, and tissue specimens were excised from the central region of the fetal side, deprived of the amniotic membrane.

Samples were rapidly cut into small pieces (1 cm³) and immediately frozen at -80°C. The frozen placental tissue was powdered by using the Mikro Dismembrator U (B. Braun—Biotech International GmbH, Schwarzenberger Weg 73.79, D-34212 Melsungen, Germany) in liquid N₂.

Insulin and IGF-1 Receptor Measurements and Phosphorylation

Powdered placental tissue was homogenized for 1 min in ice-cold lysis buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 10 mM sodium fluoride, 10% glycerol, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 2 mm phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, 2 mm sodium orthovanadate, 5 μg/ml leupeptin, 5.9 μg/ml Aprotinin, 1x Complete Roche—Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Tablets. The tissue homogenate was incubated for 60 min at 4°C in continuous rotation and then centrifuged at 14,000 g for 60 min. The resulting supernatant was collected and assayed for protein concentration using the Bradford dye-binding assay kit with BSA as a standard.

For immunoprecipitation studies, equal amounts of placental extracts (1 mg) were subjected to immunoprecipitation between protein G-Sepharose beads and anti-insulin receptor NB400-142 (MA-20) from Novus Biologicals (Littleton, USA) or anti-IGF-1R (Ab-1) mouse mAb (αIR3) from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA) for 2 h at 4°C, washed three times with lysis buffer, then eluted with Laemmli buffer 2 x for 5 min at 100°C.

For immunoblotting studies, equal amounts of solubilized placental proteins were resolved by electrophoresis on Criterion TGX gels 4%–15% (Bio-Rad, USA), directly or after immunoprecipitation with the specific antibodies, as indicated above. The resolved proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose blotting membrane (Amersham Protran GE Healthcare Life Sciences, GE) using a transfer buffer containing 192 mM glycine, 25 mM Tris pH 8,3, 20% (vol/vol) methanol. To reduce non-specific binding, the membranes were incubated in TBST supplemented with 5% nonfat dry milk for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with the appropriated antibodies.

Polyclonal anti-IGF-1 receptor beta-subunit was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Beverly, MA). Polyclonal anti-insulin receptor beta-subunit was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA).

The proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence using ECL™ anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG horseradish peroxidase linked whole antibody (from sheep) (GE Healthcare, UK) and quantified by densitometric analysis using ImageJ analysis software (1.42 q, Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, USA).

Insulin Receptor Isoforms’ Transcript Measurement

RNA was extracted by Trizol RNA isolation (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) through the gentle MACS TM Dissociator instrument using the M-Tubes (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany). Two μg RNA were reverse transcribed into cDNA using High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kits (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). Synthesized cDNA was then combined in PCR reaction using forward and reverse primers to detect A and B isoform of the insulin receptor as previously described (28). The signal intensity was quantified by densitometric analysis using ImageJ analysis software.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Fisher exact test or χ2 test were used when appropriate for categorical variables. Linear and logistic regressions were used for the correlation between variables (with continuous or dichotomous outcome, respectively) and the Student’s t test for comparison between the two groups. Quantitative data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), qualitative data as percentage (%). A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison Test was performed when comparison among groups by One-way non-parametric ANOVA showed significant differences.

Data analyses were performed using the StatView and SPSS statistical package software (version 15; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Clinical Characteristics, Glucose Control, and Pregnancy Outcomes

Clinical and anthropometrical features of the studied cohort are summarized in Table 1. Both age and pre-pregnancy BMI were significantly different in the three groups and, therefore, the statistical analysis was corrected for these two parameters.

In T1D women the peri-conception HbA1c was 7.9% ± 1.5. Seventeen (85%) T1D patients were on multi-injective insulin therapy, while three of them (15%) were on insulin pump therapy. Only four T1D patients (20%) planned the pregnancy, reaching peri-conception HbA1c <6.5%. Women with GDM were treated with either diet alone (n=9, 45%) or insulin in addition to diet (55%).

Compared to the GDM women, T1D women showed significantly higher average capillary blood glucose levels at the third trimester of pregnancy (108 ± 14 mg/dl vs. 119 ± 16 mg/dl, p<0.05) and at peripartum (87 ± 14 mg/dl vs. 123 ± 47 mg/dl, p<0.01). T1D patients also had higher third-trimester HbA1c values (6.5% ± 0.7 vs. 5.4% ± 0.3, p<0.01) (Table 1).

In both T1D and GDM women HbA1c values during pregnancy correlated with glucose values in the peripartum period (R-squared 0.14, p=0.02) suggesting that peripartum values reflected the level of metabolic control during pregnancy.

The mean weight gain during pregnancy was higher in T1D patients (14.3 ± 5.4 kg) compared to both GDM and NGT women (Table 1) while systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were similar in the three groups (Table 1).

Gestational age at delivery was significantly lower (p<0.05) in the T1D group (37 ± 2 weeks), compared to the GDM group (38 ± 1 weeks) and to the NGT group (39 ± 1 weeks). T1D patients had a higher rate of preterm birth (25%, p<0.01) (Table 2). In T1D group, also the percentage of Caesarean section was higher (70%) compared to the other two groups (45% and 35% for the GDM and the NGT women, respectively) (p<0.05).

In T1D patients, a higher rate of neonatal hypoglycemia (15%) was observed as well as less favorable neonatal anthropometric indices: higher percentage of macrosomia (25%), weight at birth (3451 ± 820 g) and Rohrer ponderal index (2.82 ± 0.5 g/cm³), compared to GDM and NGT women. On the contrary, the Apgar score was similar in the three groups (Table 2).

In T1D and GDM women, HbA1c values during pregnancy were correlated with macrosomia/LGA (OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.36–8.15, p= 0.008).

Other diabetes-related complications during pregnancy were rare: one T1D woman developed microalbuminuria and two developed non-proliferative retinopathy. Preeclampsia occurred in one patient with GDM.

Placental Insulin and IGF-1 Receptor Content and Phosphorylation

The total IR protein content was reduced in the placenta of T1D women (-53% compared to the NGT group and -40% compared to the GDM group) (Figure 1A). In contrast, in T1D group, IR phosphorylation was slightly increased (+33% and +13% compared to the NGT and GDM groups, respectively) (Figure 1A). The IR content and phosphorylation were similar in GDM women treated only with diet (45% of GDM cases) and in GDM women treated also with insulin. A positive and statistically significant correlation was observed at the linear regression analysis between phosphorylation of placental IR and the glucose levels during the third trimester of GDM and T1D pregnancy (R-squared 0.21, p=0.003) (Figure 2).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1 IR and IGF-1R content and phosphorylation in placental tissues. Insulin receptor protein content was detected by immunoblotting with a polyclonal anti-insulin receptor β-subunit. (A) The protein content of IGF-1R in placenta samples was detected by immunoblotting using a polyclonal anti-IGF-1R β-subunit. (B) Solubilized placental tissues were subjected to immunoprecipitation with an anti-IR or anti IGF-1R. The resulting immune complexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with an anti-PY antibody to detect receptor phosphorylation (A, B). Protein content was normalized against β-actin, whereas phosphorylated proteins were normalized against their total amount. Each bar represents mean ± SE of all placental samples (n=40 for NGT, n=20 for GDM and n=20 for T1D). A representative Western-blot is included in the bottom (five different patients for each group). IR-A mRNA expression in placental tissue measured by RT-PCR. The bar graphs show the quantitation of IR-A mRNA (mean ± SE) in all samples for each group (C). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001, after adjusting, in multivariate logistic regression models, for age, pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational age at delivery and type of delivery.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2 Linear regression analysis between phosphorylation of IR (pIR) and average capillary glucose levels during the third trimester. Self-monitoring of blood glucose performed by GDM and T1D patients during the third trimester of gestation was correlated with the IR phosphorylation in the placenta of GDM and T1D women.

The total IGF-1R content was also slightly reduced in the T1D patients compared to the other two groups, but, in contrast to the IR, IGF-1R phosphorylation was strongly increased (p=0.006) compared to the NGT group (Figure 1B).

We found that, if IR-A was the prevalent IR isoform in the placenta of all three groups (NGT 73%, GDM 77%, T1D 83%), it was significantly increased in the placenta of T1D patients compared to the NGT group (p=0.040) (Figure 1C).

Maternal Blood Glucose Level, Placental Insulin and IGF-1 Receptors Content and Activation

To evaluate the influence of maternal glucose level at peripartum on the IR and IGF-1R expression and phosphorylation, and IR-A/IR-B expression ratio in the placenta, patients were subdivided on the basis of peripartum (within 6 h of delivery) glycemia either ≥90 mg/dl or <90 mg/dl, regardless of the diagnosis. IR content and phosphorylation were similar in placental tissues from patients with peripartum glucose level either ≥90 mg/dl or <90 mg/dl (Figure 3A). In contrast to IR, IGF-1R phosphorylation was significantly increased (p<0.0001) in patients with peripartum glucose >90 mg/dl (Figure 3B).

FIGURE 3

Figure 3 IR and IGF-1R content and activation in relationship to the maternal capillary blood glucose level during labor and delivery. IR content and phosphorylation (A), and IGF-1R content and phosphorylation (B) in placental tissues of patients with peripartum blood glucose <90 mg/dl (N=25) or ≥90 mg/dl (N=15). Each bar represents mean ± SE of the samples indicated above. ***p < 0.0001. A representative Western-blot is included in the bottom (five different patients for each group). IR-A mRNA expression in placental tissues of patients with peripartum average blood glucose <90 mg/dl (N=25) or ≥90 mg/dl (N=15) (C) and of patients with peri-partum average blood glucose <120 mg/dl (N=30) or ≥120 mg/dl (N=10) (D). Each bar represents mean ± SE of the samples indicated above. *p < 0.05.

IR-A expression was slightly, non-significantly increased in the placenta of patients with peripartum glucose level ≥90 mg/dl (Figure 3C). The difference became statistically significant (p=0.046) when a cut-off level of 120 mg/dl was used instead of 90 (Figure 3D).

Therefore, peripartum hyperglycemia, which may reflect worse metabolic control during pregnancy, is associated to increased IGF-1R phosphorylation and increased expression of the IR-A isoform.

Discussion

Hyperglycemia has detrimental effects on the placenta development and growth (7) with consequent increased risk for adverse maternal and/or fetal outcomes. In presence of high blood glucose, the expression and signaling of different growth factors can be altered. In a rabbit model, an exposure to maternal hyperglycemia in the periconception period is able to irreversibly affect the feto-placental phenotype, through a structural and molecular alteration of placenta (29). IR and IGF-1R and their ligands have a relevant role in the placental and fetal growth but their expression and activity in placenta of diabetic women is poorly understood.

Our study provides some novel information on the field. By comparing pregnant women with T1D and GDM, we were able to observe the effects of a pre-existing hyperglycemia (T1D) from hyperglycemia occurring in the second half of pregnancy (GDM), or pregnancy without hyperglycemia. Of course, both T1D and GDM pregnant women received appropriate treatment to achieve a good glycemic control (30), and this treatment may have influenced the expression and phosphorylation of IR and IGF-1R in the placenta at term, thus obscuring the differences. However, some differences remained, and probably contributed to the worse outcomes of T1D pregnant women. Comparing the glycemic control in T1D and GDM starting from the 28^th week of gestation (when GDM was diagnosed in most of patients), both glycemia and HbA1c values were higher in T1D patients than in GDM patients, despite in T1D patients HbA1c was significantly lower in the third trimester compared to the conception level (6.5 ± 0.7% vs. 7.8 ± 1.4%, p <0.001). In T1D patients, the significantly higher glycemic level was associated with a higher percentage of macrosomia or LGA, as well as the newborn weight and the ponderal index. These latter indexes are positively correlated with the placenta weight, which in turn positively correlates with HbA1c values. These results strongly suggest a close link between maternal glycemic control and the fetal-placental unit growth.

Regarding the expression of receptors, both IR and IGF-1R content was reduced in the placenta of T1D patients but IGF-1R was significantly more phosphorylated in T1D placenta and this activation was significantly increased in patients with peripartum glucose level >90 mg/dl. These results are consistent with the existing data that demonstrated a phosphorylation of IGF-1R increased by two to three times in pregnant rats with streptozocin-induced insulinopenic diabetes (31), compared to the control group. IGF-1R is known to play an important role on the control of placental and fetal growth. Fetal IGF-1 gene deletion causes a reduction in placental weight (32), and the same holds for fetal weight when an IGF-1R mutation is present (33). Moreover, intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) is associated with a reduction of placental IGF-1R (34), while IGF-1R gene amplification (three copies) causes an increased weight and length of the newborns (35). It has been reported that the insulin receptor is less expressed in the placenta of GDM women treated with diet alone than in the placenta of GDM women treated also with insulin (10). We did not find such a difference probably because of the similar pre-pregnancy BMI in the two groups (23.8 ± 2.7 kg/m² in diet alone group vs. 24.3 ± 3.6 kg/m² in insulin group, p=0.75) as well as the similar insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) (1.70 ± 0.81 in diet alone group vs. 1.96 ± 1.49 in insulin group, p=0.67). However, our different results might also depend on the sample size of these subgroups, not sufficient to highlight differences in insulin receptor expression between GDM women treated with only diet and those treated also with insulin.

The importance of the expression and function of the insulin receptor family in the placenta is confirmed by the IR isoform biology. The IR mediates both metabolic and mitogenic effects, but IR-A and IGF-1R are both receptors for IGF-2, a well-known growth factor during pregnancy (36). IR-A is more expressed in proliferating cells (37), and IR-A expression was increased in the placenta of T1D women and in those with peripartum blood glucose higher than 120 mg/dl. These data suggest that higher level of blood glucose can regulate the expression of IR-A, modulating fetal growth. Moreover, we observed a significant correlation between placental IR phosphorylation and third trimester blood glucose level, as well as a positive correlation between HbA1c during pregnancy and glucose levels in the peripartum period. High level of HbA1c is a strong risk factor for macrosomia/LGA (OR 3.33). Therefore, these findings confirm that a strict glycemic control is necessary from conception to delivery in order to reduce adverse outcomes. Our results also indicate that the expression and activation of placental receptors are possible biological mechanisms contributing to the hyperglycemia-related complications during pregnancy. Despite the great difficulties in patients with T1D, the achievement of an ambitious goal of glycemic control is required and to this aim the new technologies (insulin pump therapy, continuous glucose monitoring) can be helpful (38–40).

In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, our study is the first demonstrating that higher HbA1c values are associated with fetal macrosomia/LGA and are related to higher blood glucose level in the peripartum period, suggesting the increased phosphorylation of IGF-1R and the increased expression of IR-A among its possible mechanisms. Both these mechanisms can promote an excessive fetal growth. Further studies are necessary to better understand the role of IR and IGF-1R in physiological pregnancies, particularly those complicated by diabetes.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available upon reasonable request directed to LS. lsciacca@unict.it

Ethics Statement

Ethical review and approval were not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

AT contributed to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, wrote part of the manuscript, drafted tables and some figures, and reviewed the paper. NMS performed in vitro experiments, contributed to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, wrote part of the manuscript, drafted some figures, and revised the paper. AM contributed to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, and reviewed the manuscript. GE contributed to data acquisition. RV contributed to data interpretation and reviewed the manuscript. LS contributed to the study design, data interpretation, wrote and reviewed the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Prof. Giuliana Arcidiacono, English and Anglo-American language PhD University of Catania, for the language revision of the manuscript. The authors thank Dr. Federica Insalaco, Valentina Rapisarda, and Federica Tata for their help in collecting and storing the placentas.

References

1. Kitzmiller JL, Block JM, Brown FM, Catalano PM, Conway DL, Coustan DR, et al. Managing preexisting diabetes for pregnancy: summary of evidence and consensus recommendations for care. Diabetes Care (2008) 31(5):1060–79. doi: 10.2337/dc08-9020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Tennant PW, Glinianaia SV, Bilous RW, Rankin J, Bell R. Pre-existing diabetes, maternal glycated haemoglobin, and the risks of fetal and infant death: a population-based study. Diabetologia (2014) 57(2):285–94. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-3108-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Persson M, Norman M, Hanson U. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in type 1 diabetic pregnancies: A large, population-based study. Diabetes Care (2009) 32(11):2005–9. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0656

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Group HSCR, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. New Engl J Med (2008) 358(19):1991–2002. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707943

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Pintaudi B, Fresa R, Dalfra M, Dodesini AR, Vitacolonna E, Tumminia A, et al. The risk stratification of adverse neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes (STRONG) study. Acta Diabetol (2018) 55(12):1261–73. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1208-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Nteeba J, Varberg KM, Scott RL, Simon ME, Iqbal K, Soares MJ. Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus alters placental structure, efficiency, and plasticity. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care (2020) 8(1):e001243. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001243

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Higgins M, Felle P, Mooney EE, Bannigan J, McAuliffe FM. Stereology of the placenta in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Placenta (2011) 32(8):564–9. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.04.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Hiden U, Glitzner E, Hartmann M, Desoye G. Insulin and the IGF system in the human placenta of normal and diabetic pregnancies. J Anat (2009) 215(1):60–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.01035.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Desoye G, Hauguel-de Mouzon S. The human placenta in gestational diabetes mellitus. The insulin and cytokine network. Diabetes Care (2007) 30 Suppl 2:S120–6. doi: 10.2337/dc07-s203

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Desoye G, Hofmann HH, Weiss PA. Insulin binding to trophoblast plasma membranes and placental glycogen content in well-controlled gestational diabetic women treated with diet or insulin, in well-controlled overt diabetic patients and in healthy control subjects. Diabetologia (1992) 35(1):45–55. doi: 10.1007/BF00400851

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Ruiz-Palacios M, Prieto-Sanchez MT, Ruiz-Alcaraz AJ, Blanco-Carnero JE, Sanchez-Campillo M, Parrilla JJ, et al. Insulin Treatment May Alter Fatty Acid Carriers in Placentas from Gestational Diabetes Subjects. Int J Mol Sci (2017) 18(6):1203. doi: 10.3390/ijms18061203

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Nelson SM, Freeman DJ, Sattar N, Lindsay RS. Role of adiponectin in matching of fetal and placental weight in mothers with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care (2008) 31(6):1123–5. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2195

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Lindsay RS, Walker JD, Halsall I, Hales CN, Calder AA, Hamilton BA, et al. Insulin and insulin propeptides at birth in offspring of diabetic mothers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2003) 88(4):1664–71. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Liu YJ, Tsushima T, Onoda N, Minei S, Sanaka M, Nagashima T, et al. Expression of messenger RNA of insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and IGF binding proteins (IGFBP1-6) in placenta of normal and diabetic pregnancy. Endocr J (1996) 43 Suppl:S89–91. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.43.suppl_s89

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Sobrevia L, Salsoso R, Fuenzalida B, Barros E, Toledo L, Silva L, et al. Insulin Is a Key Modulator of Fetoplacental Endothelium Metabolic Disturbances in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Front Physiol (2016) 7:119:119. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Westermeier F, Salomon C, Gonzalez M, Puebla C, Guzman-Gutierrez E, Cifuentes F, et al. Insulin restores gestational diabetes mellitus-reduced adenosine transport involving differential expression of insulin receptor isoforms in human umbilical vein endothelium. Diabetes (2011) 60(6):1677–87. doi: 10.2337/db11-0155

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Desoye G, Hartmann M, Blaschitz A, Dohr G, Hahn T, Kohnen G, et al. Insulin receptors in syncytiotrophoblast and fetal endothelium of human placenta. Immunohistochemical evidence for developmental changes in distribution pattern. Histochemistry (1994) 101(4):277–85. doi: 10.1007/BF00315915

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Dalfra MG, Soldato A, Moghetti P, Lombardi S, Vinci C, De Cata AP, et al. Diabetic pregnancy outcomes in mothers treated with basal insulin lispro protamine suspension or NPH insulin: a multicenter retrospective Italian study. J Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med Off J Eur Assoc Perinatal Medicine Fed Asia Oceania Perinatal Societies Int Soc Perinatal Obstet (2016) 29(7):1061–5. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1033619

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Sciacca L, Marotta V, Insalaco F, Tumminia A, Squatrito S, Vigneri R, et al. Use of insulin detemir during pregnancy. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis NMCD (2010) 20(4):e15–6. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2009.12.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Milluzzo A, Tumminia A, Scalisi NM, Frittitta L, Vigneri R, Sciacca L. Insulin degludec in the first trimester of pregnancy: Report of two cases. J Diabetes Invest (2017) 9(3):629–31. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12721

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Toledano Y, Hadar E, Hod M. Pharmacotherapy for hyperglycemia in pregnancy - The new insulins. Diabetes Res Clin Pract (2018) 145:59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.04.035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Ozmen A, Unek G, Kipmen-Korgun D, Korgun ET. The PI3K/Akt and MAPK-ERK1/2 pathways are altered in STZ induced diabetic rat placentas. Histol Histopathol (2014) 29(6):743–56. doi: 10.14670/HH-29.743

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Burton GJ, Fowden AL, Thornburg KL. Placental Origins of Chronic Disease. Physiol Rev (2016) 96(4):1509–65. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. International Association of D, Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus P, Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care (2010) 33(3):676–82. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1848

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD) - Società Italiana di Diabetologia (SID). Standard italiani per la cura del diabete mellito (2018). Available at: http://www.standarditaliani.it/ (Accessed August 5 (2020)).

Google Scholar

26. American Diabetes A. 10. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care (2018) 41(Suppl 1):S105–S18. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Maresh MJ, Holmes VA, Patterson CC, Young IS, Pearson DW, Walker JD, et al. Glycemic targets in the second and third trimester of pregnancy for women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care (2015) 38(1):34–42. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1755

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Sciacca L, Cassarino MF, Genua M, Vigneri P, Giovanna Pennisi M, Malandrino P, et al. Biological effects of insulin and its analogs on cancer cells with different insulin family receptor expression. J Cell Physiol (2014) 229(11):1817–21. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24635

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Rousseau-Ralliard D, Couturier-Tarrade A, Thieme R, Brat R, Rolland A, Boileau P, et al. A short periconceptional exposure to maternal type-1 diabetes is sufficient to disrupt the feto-placental phenotype in a rabbit model. Mol Cell Endocrinol (2019) 480:42–53. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2018.10.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. American Diabetes A. 14. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care (2020) 43(Suppl 1):S183–S92. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Hauguel-de Mouzon S, Louizeau M, Girard J. Functional alterations of type I insulin-like growth factor receptor in placenta of diabetic rats. Biochem J (1992) 288( Pt 1):273–9. doi: 10.1042/bj2880273

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Woods KA, Camacho-Hubner C, Savage MO, Clark AJ. Intrauterine growth retardation and postnatal growth failure associated with deletion of the insulin-like growth factor I gene. New Engl J Med (1996) 335(18):1363–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199610313351805

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Abuzzahab MJ, Schneider A, Goddard A, Grigorescu F, Lautier C, Keller E, et al. IGF-I receptor mutations resulting in intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation. New Engl J Med (2003) 349(23):2211–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Laviola L, Perrini S, Belsanti G, Natalicchio A, Montrone C, Leonardini A, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction in humans is associated with abnormalities in placental insulin-like growth factor signaling. Endocrinology (2005) 146(3):1498–505. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-1332

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Okubo Y, Siddle K, Firth H, O’Rahilly S, Wilson LC, Willatt L, et al. Cell proliferation activities on skin fibroblasts from a short child with absence of one copy of the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF1R) gene and a tall child with three copies of the IGF1R gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2003) 88(12):5981–8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Frasca F, Pandini G, Scalia P, Sciacca L, Mineo R, Costantino A, et al. Insulin receptor isoform A, a newly recognized, high-affinity insulin-like growth factor II receptor in fetal and cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol (1999) 19(5):3278–88. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.5.3278

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Vella V, Milluzzo A, Scalisi NM, Vigneri P, Sciacca L. Insulin Receptor Isoforms in Cancer. Int J Mol Sci (2018) 19(11):3615. doi: 10.3390/ijms19113615

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Tumminia A, Crimi S, Sciacca L, Buscema M, Frittitta L, Squatrito S, et al. Efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycaemic control and glucose variability in type 1 diabetic patients treated with either insulin pumps or multiple insulin injection therapy: a randomized controlled crossover trial. Diabetes/Metab Res Rev (2015) 31(1):61–8. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2557

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Tumminia A, Sciacca L, Frittitta L, Squatrito S, Vigneri R, Le Moli R, et al. Integrated insulin pump therapy with continuous glucose monitoring for improved adherence: technology update. Patient Preference Adherence (2015) 9:1263–70. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S69482

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Feig DS, Donovan LE, Corcoy R, Murphy KE, Amiel SA, Hunt KF, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CONCEPTT): a multicentre international randomised controlled trial. Lancet (2017) 390(10110):2347–59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32400-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar