Elikanah Olusayo Adegoke
Md Saidur Rahman
Myung-Geol Pang- Department of Animal Science and Technology and BET Research Institute, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, South Korea
Male reproductive function and health are largely dependent on the testes, which are strictly regulated by their major cell components, i. e., Sertoli, Leydig, and germ cells. Sertoli cells perform a crucial phagocytic function in addition to supporting the development of germ cells. Leydig cells produce hormones essential for male reproductive function, and germ cell quality is a key parameter for male fertility assessment. However, these cells have been identified as primary targets of endocrine disruptors, including bisphenols. Bisphenols are a category of man-made organic chemicals used to manufacture plastics, epoxy resins, and personal care products such as lipsticks, face makeup, and nail lacquers. Despite long-term uncertainty regarding their safety, bisphenols are still being used worldwide, especially bisphenol A. While considerable attention has been paid to the effects of bisphenols on health, current bisphenol-related reproductive health cases indicate that greater attention should be given to these chemicals. Bisphenols, especially bisphenol A, F, and S, have been reported to elicit various effects on testicular cells, including apoptosis, DNA damage, disruption of intercommunication among cells, mitochondrial damage, disruption of tight junctions, and arrest of proliferation, which threaten male reproductive health. In addition, bisphenols are xenoestrogens, which alter organs and cells functions via agonistic or antagonistic interplay with hormone receptors. In this review, we provide in utero, in vivo, and in vitro evidence that currently available brands of bisphenols impair male reproductive health through their action on testicular cells.
Introduction
In recent years, the declining trend in male reproductive health has generated public concern, and industrialized countries are the most affected (1, 2). A recent study indicated that the fertility rate has drastically declined in the United States of America, European countries, Japan, South Korea, and Singapore (2). About half of these infertility occurrences are linked to male factors (3–5). Studies relating to infertility in both human and animals have identified endocrine disruptors, including bisphenols, among etiologies (2, 5, 6). Bisphenols are man-made organic chemicals used to manufacture plastics, epoxy resins, and other products. The most common and widely used analog of bisphenol, bisphenol A (BPA), was designed by Diani in 1891 and synthesized by Zincke in 1905 (7). However, there are growing concerns about BPA which constitutes a major component of food packaging, plastics and other household products becoming a threat owing to its tendency to leach into the surroundings. The perceived harmful tendency of BPA has led to a complete ban, regulatory policies, and search for safer substitutes in many countries (8–10). Consequently, there is variation in its usage in different countries (8, 9).
As BPA is being removed from consumer products, there is a progressive move to its derivatives: bisphenols F, E, B, and S as materials for polycarbonate resin (11). Other industrial application of BPS include wash fastening and electroplating (12), BPF epoxy resins are used in lacquers, liners, adhesives, dental sealants, and food packaging (13), while other analogs of BPA such as 2,2-bis-(3,5- dibromo-4-hydroxyphenyl)propane (TBBPA), are commonly used as fire retardant in several materials (11). An ideal substitute for replacing BPA, whose safety is of public concern, should be inert or less toxic. Unfortunately, these analogs have been implicated in male reproductive health problems and found in several household commodities, for instance; body cream, shampoo, meat, and milk (14, 15), making them imperfect substitutes for BPA. Bisphenols are ubiquitous contaminants in humans, livestock, wildlife, and the environment (16). Humans get exposed to bisphenols through food, skin, and inhalation (17, 18). Protective coatings of drinks and food cans, and household water containers are made of phenolic epoxy resins that contain BPA (8).
Once BPA and analogs are absorbed into the body, their major targets include testicular cells (19, 20). Functional cells of the testes include Leydig, Sertoli, and germ cells (21). Although the testis houses other important cells such as peritubular myoid, nerve, blood, and lymphatic endothelial cells, information on impact of bisphenols on these cells in relation to male reproductive health is few (22). Leydig cells produce testosterone, which perform a crucial function in differentiation of the germ cells and maintenance of testicular functions (21). Additionally, testosterone produced by Leydig cells perform important functions in the maintenance of the prostate gland (23). Sertoli cells phagocytize apoptotic germ cells to maintain testicular homeostasis for normal spermatogenesis and regulate germ cell proliferation and differentiation (24). These cells control male somatic sex determination during embryogenesis and spermatogenesis in adulthood (25). In addition, Sertoli cells secrete lactate and pyruvate, which are sources of energy for germ cells (26–29). Their number in the testes is, therefore, closely related to testicular volume and sperm yield (21). The production of viable spermatozoa involves a sequence of gradual differentiation of germ cells via mitosis and meiosis, and final transformation into mature sperm (30, 31).
Previous studies have revealed estrogen signaling as important signaling involved in endocrine disrupting activities of bisphenols, especially BPA (11, 17, 32). Estrogen signaling occurs through multiple pathways in which estrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ) regulate transcription of target genes directly or indirectly (33). BPA binds with cytoplasm estrogen receptors (cERs) or ERs located in the nucleus (nERs) in the genomic pathway. The binding to these receptors affects nuclear chromatin function and regulates the transcription/translation of genes and protein. Consequently, the cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival are altered (17, 34). In non-genomic signaling pathway, BPA could bind to G-protein coupled receptor (GPR30) on the membrane of testicular cells especially sperm cells (17). The activation of these receptors by BPA in sperm cells results in rapid phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), protein kinase A (PKA), and alteration in levels of cyclic adenosine monophosphate, protein kinase C, and intracellular calcium which result in serious cellular effect (11). BPA can also elicit its effect on testicular cells via reactive oxygen species-mediated damage and apoptosis through activation of pro-apoptotic signaling (MAPK, Fas/FasL, Caspase 3 and 9, Bax) (35).
Although, a study indicated that BPA probably incapable to elicit observable effects at low concentration through estrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ) by demonstrating a low affinity between BPA and these receptors (32), recent studies reported that BPA possesses a strong affinity with membrane-bound estrogen receptors and G protein–coupled receptor 30 (GPR30) and evokes cellular effects at low doses (picomolar and nanomolar concentrations), which are lower compared to concentrations needed to stimulate nuclear ERs (36, 37). This review suggests that extremely low doses of BPA that are incapable of producing detrimental effects in tissues and organs via ERα and ERβ will produce negative effects in testicular cells through GPR30 and ERR-γ which are more abundant in the cells (Figure 1). Therefore, the objective of this review is to clarify conflicting studies surrounding the effect of bisphenols on male reproductive health, and produce evidence that BPA and currently available analogs threaten male health and fertility through their action on testicular cells, which results in alterations to testicular functions and culminates in impairment of male reproductive health.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the action mechanism of bisphenols on testicular cells.
Function of Leydig Cells in Male Reproductive Health
Leydig cells are found in the interstitial spaces of the testis (38). They are vital parts of male reproductive organ development and reproduction (39). Androgens produced by Leydig cells are essential for the differentiation of male genitalia and masculinization in response to luteinizing hormones from the pituitary (39). Sexual differentiation in males is a complex sequence of processes that involves activities of hormones produced by somatic cells in the gonads, including Leydig cells (38). There are two populations of Leydig cells in eutherian mammals: fetal and adult Leydig cells (38–40). The post-natal surge in androgens has led to suggestion that there is neonatal or infantile population of Leydig cells in certain species such as humans and primates (38, 40). The fetal Leydig cells are found in the embryonic testes following formation of the testis until parturition (40, 41). In mouse, the fetal Leydig cell secrete androstenedione which is consequently converted to testosterone by hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 3(HSD17B3) produced by Sertoli cells, whereas fetal Leydig cells of rat produce testosterone commencing from gestational day 15.5 (39–41). The adult Leydig cells synthesize testosterone needed for the development of male reproductive organ and the commencement of spermatogenesis (38). Although both fetal and adult Leydig cells possess some distinctions in morphological characteristics, they perform same function of androgen production (38). Androgens and other hormones produced by Leydig cells are indispensable to male reproductive system development and health (38). The absence or dysfunction of these cells give rise to maldevelopment of reproductive organs and disorders associated with incomplete masculinization of the male fetus (41, 42). Additionally, the alteration of Leydig cell function can adversely impair fertility in men (43). Normal male sex differentiation procedure involves movement of the testes from their initial location close to the kidneys into the extracorporeal position inside the scrotum. There are two separate and successive phases of testicular descent: the intraabdominal phase, where the testes migrate to the abdominal base; and the inguinoscrotal phase, which involves the movement of the testes through the inguinal canal into the scrotum (43). Each of these phases is controlled by specific hormones; insulin-like 3 (INSL3) and testosterone (40), produced by Leydig cells. The intraabdominal phase which occurs in man between 8 and 10 weeks of gestation is controlled by INSL3, while testosterone regulates the inguinoscrotal phase which occurs between 20 and 26 weeks of gestation (44, 45). Therefore, Leydig cells perform a critical role in male reproductive development and health.
The Effects of Bisphenols on Leydig Cells and the Development of Male Reproductive Organs
Leydig cells are the main producers of testosterone in the male reproductive system, and harm to them can lead to infertility (6). A previous study identified a high occurrence of undescended testes in several developed nations (43); one third of male born prematurely have unilateral cryptorchidism, while 2–8% cases are found in full-term males, indicating cryptorchidism as prevalent male reproductive abnormality (46). Leydig cells have been identified among the target cells of bisphenols and other environmental contaminants (47–49). There is increasing evidence of the detrimental implication of BPA and derivatives on health and function of male reproductive system acting via Leydig cells in a dose-dependent manner (48, 49). A previous study examined the effect of BPA on testicular testosterone production using human (6th−11th gestational weeks) and rodent [(Wistar rat:14.5 dpc), (C57BL/6 mice 12.5 dpc)] testicular explants using Fetal Testis Assay (FeTA) method and found that testosterone production was unaffected when exposed to 10−12 M BPA for 3 days. However, a reduction in testosterone secretion was noticed with exposure to 10−8 M BPA (48). By implication, the effect of BPA on Leydig cells is dose dependent. In the same study, 10−8 M BPA decreased testosterone production in human testicular explant, while a higher concentration of 10−5 M was required to produce same effect in mice and rats. These results indicate that the effect of BPA is species dependent. Similar to the results obtained from testosterone secretion, BPA decreased mRNA levels of INSL3 in both human and mouse testicular explants in species-dependent manner (48). Meanwhile, a new experiment investigating the effect of BPA on Leydig cells using human and two strains of rodent testicular explants (49) reported that the administration of BPA doses of 10−8 M and 10−5 M (the concentration that decreased testosterone and INSL3 in humans in an earlier study) for 72 h suppressed testosterone secretion in Sprague-Dawley fetal rat testicular explants, while a higher concentration of 10−5 M repressed testosterone in Wistar strain. This report implies that higher concentration of BPA is required to reduce testosterone production in Wistar rat, while a lower concentration similar to that of human is required to produce same effect in Sprague–Dawley strain. Therefore, whether data regarding the effect of bisphenols on Leydig cells from all strains of rodents under the same conditions can be used to make inferences for human risk assessments requires further investigation. Another experiment conducted using the TM3 Leydig cell from mice indicated that BPA decreased testosterone production, cell viability, growth, metabolic active mitochondria, and induced cell death and alteration of mitochondria membrane potential (50). Exposure of adult Leydig cells to 0.01 nm BPA altered testosterone production by 25%, while 2.4 μg/kg/day decreased testosterone production, androgen biosynthesis, and CYP17 gene expression in rats in the same study (6). Another study conducted to investigate the involvement of BPA in the maldevelopment of male reproductive organs and heath demonstrated that BPA increased aromatase mRNA levels but suppressed testosterone production in R2C cell line (from rats) in vitro (51).
Furthermore, studies on the effect of bisphenols on development of male reproductive organs revealed that 10,000 nmol/L of BPA and its analogs; BPS and BPF, reduced the mRNA level of fetal Leydig cell-related genes [Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (Star), 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/Delta 5–>4-isomerase type 1 (Hsd3b1), cytochrome P450 family 17 subfamily A member 1 (Cyp17a1), INSL3] in 12.5 dpc fetal mouse testicular explants cultured for 3 days (52). In the same study, the author expanded their earlier finding that used (FeTA) method (48) by adopting basal condition to investigate the differential effect of BPA on rat (14.5 dpc), mouse (12.5 dpc), and human (6.3–11.1 gestational weeks) testicular explants. It was confirmed that 1,000 nmol/L (10−6 M) of BPA significantly reduced basal testosterone secretion of human and mouse fetal testes (52). The authors concluded that the minimum observed adverse effect level is 100-fold higher in mouse than in human testes and 100 or 1,000-fold higher in rat than in human testes in basal conditions (52). Moreover, higher occurrences of undescended testes may stem from impairment of the functions of Leydig cells during embryonic stage. In another study, BPA concentration in the blood was negatively correlated with INSL3 expression level (53). Several other studies have indicated that BPA and its analogs reduced both Leydig cell number and testosterone production (54–59). Interestingly, a clinical study conducted on 160 neonate males (Control:80, hypospadias patients: 80) suffering from hypospadias had seven folds BPA concentration in their blood compared to normal newborns (60). Testosterone controls the masculinization of male genitourinary system and a decrease or alteration in its production between days 15 and 18 post-coitus results in developmental defects in male rat fetuses (52). Despite the variation in the mode of study (in vitro or in vivo), route (subcutaneous or gavage), duration (short or long), and species, all researchers confirmed the effect of bisphenols on Leydig cells. Variations observed in reports are linked with dosage, species, age, duration, and solvent used for dissolving bisphenols. Meanwhile, the interspecies discrepancies present critical concern since animal studies are commonly employed in risk assessment of bisphenols. Human risk assessment data extrapolation from in vivo animal studies has generated a concern because metabolic process of BPA in man and rodent is different (61–63). The sensitivity to BPA in rodent fetal and adult-type Leydig cells cannot be comparatively assessed because most studies involving mature animals were conducted in vivo, moreover, hypothalamus-pituitary-testicular axis can be affected by bisphenols at varying developmental stage differently (62). Furthermore, the effect of BPA and analogs could be cell specific, e.g., BPA, BPF, BPS, BPE, BPB, and bisphenol A diglycidyl ether (BADGE) inhibit testosterone production in Leydig cells from human testicular explants, whereas Sertoli and germ cells were not affected by the same concentration in the study (54). This suggests variation in the action mechanism of bisphenols on different cells of the testes. A summary of effects of bisphenols on Leydig cells is shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Effects of Bisphenols on Leydig cells.
Effect of Bisphenols on Leydig Cells and Testicular Dysgenesis Syndrome
Hypospadias, cryptorchidism, impaired spermatogenesis, and testicular cancer are categorized as testicular dysgenesis syndrome (TDS). They also represent indices of impaired prenatal testicular development (64, 65). This syndrome (TDS) is associated with embryonic maldevelopment of the testis, which impair differentiation of somatic cells (66). Cryptorchid testes mostly harbor twisted tubules and undifferentiated Sertoli cells (66, 67). Although many factors have been hypothesized as causes of TDS, some studies have linked TDS to the effect of endocrine disruptors on Leydig cells (68–70). Bisphenols are endocrine disruptors that can cause malfunctioning of Leydig cells (47–49). Cases of TDS are characterized by the failure of gonads to fully develop and emergence of intersex genitalia (64). The influence of BPA on human fertility and its involvement in several reproductive complications, including TDS, germ cell cancers, and Sertoli cell only syndrome have been reported (10, 71–73). In a study conducted to evaluate the BPA in the blood samples of 98 cryptorchid males admitted for surgery, serum BPA levels ranged from 4.1 to 89.8 ng/mL (74). The study concluded that serum BPA was positively correlated with cryptorchidism. Effect of BPA on Leydig cells resulting to hypoplasia of the cell can be complete or incomplete. Complete hypoplasia is characterized by presence of both male and female copulatory organs. However, atrophy or hypertrophy of testicles characterized incomplete forms (48). These findings prove beyond doubt the involvement of bisphenols, especially BPA in the maldevelopment of the male reproductive organs and system. The aftermath of decreases in the expression of INSL3 and testosterone synthesis are masculinization defects. Low fertility and germ cell cancer are major complications linked with testicular dysgenesis (43). The association between the actions of bisphenols on Leydig cells and testicular dysgenesis is as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the effect of Bisphenols on Leydig cells.
The Action of Bisphenols on Leydig Cells and Prostate Health
Testosterone performs a very important function in male reproductive health. Reduction or alteration of its synthesis is connected to complications of hypogonadism and impairment of male reproductive health (52). Estrogen and testosterone execute crucial roles in the onset, advancement, and growth of prostate cancer (75). The growth and maintenance of prostate gland is regulated by testosterone and prolactin (23). Citrate production by prostate glands is performed by the highly specialized citrate-producing acini epithelial cells (23). The capability of the acini epithelial cells to produce substantial citrate depends on their zinc accumulating ability and inhibition of citrate oxidation. Meanwhile, the zinc and citrate levels are controlled by testosterone and prolactin (76, 77). There is increasing concern that exposure to xenoestrogen, including bisphenols, during critical developmental window may multiply vulnerability to prostate cancer. Leydig cells are involved in testosterone production and are major targets of bisphenols (47–49). Earlier research findings revealed that BPA decreases testosterone synthesis via Leydig cells, indicating that it is also a threat to prostate health. As shown in previous studies, BPA contamination is related to development of prostate cancer and elevates centrosome amplification in vitro (78). In another study, BPA caused enlargement of prostate and increased EGFR mRNA level in mature Sprague–Dawley rats when administered orally (79). Another study demonstrated that BPA enhanced human prostate stem cell proliferation (80). However, a recent study conducted by the same author using a rat model and human prostate epithelial cells indicated that BPA alone did not drive prostate pathology but low doses of BPA augment vulnerability to prostate cancer and induced homeostatic imbalance in adult prostate stem cell (81). At present, these studies indicate bisphenols, especially BPA, as predisposing factors of prostate cancer via decreased testosterone production. However, further investigation into the severity of the involvement of bisphenols as a single chemical and in a mixture with other xenoestrogen in the development of prostate cancer is required.
Action Mechanisms of Bisphenols on Leydig Cells
As bisphenols are estrogenic in nature, estrogen receptors (ERs) are expressed in Leydig cells and are controlled by estrogen activities (82). Information regarding the localization of ERs in Leydig cells has been inconsistent, they were reported absent (83) and present (84) in the mouse Leydig cell. It was found to be localized in fetal rat Leydig cells (85), but not in adult rat Leydig cells (86). Similarly, ERs were not detected in mouse Leydig cells (6). It was further demonstrated that ERα expression is non-detectable in human fetal testes (87), suggesting that there is no involvement of ERα in impact of BPA on human testes. This result was considered applicable in mice because BPA induced decrease in testosterone production was maintained following ERα withdrawal (48). Meanwhile, studies regarding the presence or absence of ERβ in human and mouse Leydig cells need to be confirmed in future research. Low concentrations of BPA have reportedly elicited effects via GPR30 or estrogen-related receptor gamma (ERR-γ) (88–90). Both GPR30 and ERR-gamma were expressed in human and mouse fetal testes (48) and ERR-γ has a high affinity for BPA (91). Therefore, GPR30 and ERR-γ represent means by which bisphenols act on testicular cells.
Bisphenols, Sertoli Cells, and Male Reproductive Health
Function of Sertoli Cells in Spermatogenesis
Spermatogenesis is a successive development of male germ cells to mature spermatozoa. It involves mitotic and meiotic divisions of germ cells. Sertoli cells play a key role in every stage of spermatogenesis, by clinching tightly to developing germ cells in the seminiferous tubules thereby providing a suitable milieu necessary for their development. Sertoli cells produce pyruvate for nourishment of germ cell. Lactate and pyruvate produced by Sertoli cells are needed by germ cells for energy and survival (26–29), thereby providing nutrition for their development (92). About thirty to fifty germ cells at various developmental phases can be nourished in the seminiferous epithelium by every Sertoli cell (93). The cumulative number of Sertoli cell is positively correlated with testicular size and sperm count (94). Tissue transformation that takes place during spermiation is achieved through the activities of proteases produced by Sertoli cells (21). Similarly, plasminogen activator which facilitates the migration of preleptotene spermatocytes are produced by Sertoli cells (21). Importantly, Sertoli cells expansive junctional networks and communication provide structural support for developing germ cells (20).
Effect of Bisphenols on the Blood-Testis Barrier and Its Implication on Spermatogenesis
Several studies have provided strong evidence that BPA derivatives (BPE and BPS) affect Sertoli cell functions (19, 20, 95). An experimental study on the effect of BPA on Sertoli cells at >150 μM concentration time and dose dependently reduced cell viability, while those exposed to 200 μM BPA reduced to approximately two-thirds of the control (96). The study further revealed that Sertoli cells treated with BPA in vitro at a concentration of 200 μM induced morphological distortions such as collapse of cytoskeleton, chromatin impairment, and DNA damage in the cells. Immunocytochemistry studies of the cells showed the expression of caspase-3, colocalization of active caspase-3, and fragmentation of actin filaments (96). The authors concluded that stimulation of apoptotic pathways within the cells rather than necrosis was responsible for their death (96). In another study involving Sertoli cells, BPA induced cellular damage and apoptosis; the BPA-induced damage was attributed to its ability to block endoplasmic reticulum-Ca2+ homeostasis (97). BPA was also reported to affect anchoring junction which attached spermatids to Sertoli cells (98). This effect of BPA characterized the human Sertoli cell only (SCO) testes, in which the testes were void of blood-testis barrier and constituent proteins, especially connexin 26, which mediates adhesion or communication at the site of attachment of Sertoli cells and spermatogonial are downregulated (99). Several other studies (19, 20, 42) showed that bisphenols, especially BPA, impair male reproductive health. BPA reportedly perturbed Sertoli cell tight junction, downregulated the level of blood-testis barrier constituent proteins (JAM-A, ZO-1, N-cadherin, connexin 43), activated ERK1/2, and redistributed cell-cell interface proteins (19, 20). Although these effects were reported to be non-significant in adult rats, significant effects were observed in immature (20-day-old) rats at the same concentration, indicating a higher susceptibility of immature rats and infants to BPA (19). Information regarding the effect of bisphenols on Sertoli cells isolated from adult rats is not available. Therefore, it remains uncertain whether the effect will be significant if Sertoli cells isolated from mature rats are exposed to BPA in vitro. When cultured in vitro, Sertoli cells form a blood-testis barrier and intercellular junctions that mimic in vivo conditions between 48 and 72 h after culture (100, 101). Using in vitro methods, another study (101) investigated the mechanism of BPA action on Sertoli cells and confirmed that BPA interferes with junctional proteins of the cells, for example; occludin, connexin 43, and E-cadherin. In addition to in vitro evidence, in vivo studies involving 6-week-old male mice revealed that BPA downregulated a wide range of genes connected to Sertoli cell function [Musashi RNA Binding Protein 1 (Msi1h), Nuclear Receptor Coactivator 1(Ncoa1), nidogen 1 (Nid1), Heat shock protein beta-2 (Hspb2), and GATA-binding factor 6 (Gata6)] following prenatal exposure (102). Downregulation of the junctional and functional proteins of Sertoli cells is potentially capable of disrupting the blood-testis barrier, thereby impairing spermatogenesis (103). Clinical and laboratory reports indicate that BPA exerts higher effects on male reproduction and fertility after prenatal and neonatal exposure than adults because they are resistant to BPA (19, 104, 105). For example, oral administration of 0.02–50 mg/kgbw doses of BPA to adult rats did not alter normal sperm production; meanwhile, it disrupted the blood-testis barrier integrity when neonatal rats were treated with 50 mg/kgbw/day of BPA. Similar result was obtained during in vitro BPA treatment of rat Sertoli cells at 40–200 μM (76). Most effects of bisphenols on testicular cells become visible after many years of accumulated effects at a cellular level. A summary of the effect of bisphenols on Sertoli cells is shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Effects of bisphenols on Sertoli cells.
Bisphenol Effects on Sertoli Cells and Testicular Homeostasis
During spermatogenesis, few developing germ cells experience programmed cell death while some exfoliate some cytoplasmic materials following completion of differentiation procedures (107). Phagocytosis activities of Sertoli cells rid the testes of dead germ cells and exfoliated materials from full developed germ cells. Sertoli cells ensure elimination of noxious materials originating from dead cells and the removal of autoantigens that may induce an autoimmune response in the testes. Alteration of Sertoli cell phagocytosis is responsible for disease development and testicular dysfunction, consequently, infertility. In addition, disruption of phagocytic function of Sertoli cells interferes with spermatogenic cycle (108). Critical cellular functions like phagocytosis, structural support, and movement are achieved via actin cytoskeleton. Meanwhile, research findings on the effects of BPA on the actin cytoskeleton of the Sertoli cells revealed that BPA induced changes in the organization and location of F-actin proteins in Sertoli cell epithelia (106). The distribution of F-actin system was dose dependently disorganized when human Sertoli cells were cultured in the presence of BPA in vitro (106). The same study found that 0.4 μM BPA caused reduction of Sertoli cells actin microfilament. However, high doses, ranging from 40 to 200 μM, of BPA retracted actin microfilaments close to the nucleus (106). BPA also caused disorganization of the actin cytoskeleton in rat Sertoli cells (96). These changes were attributed to the mislocalization of two actin regulatory proteins leading to its failure to aid Sertoli cell blood-testis barrier function (17, 106). In addition, another recent study revealed that disengagement of spermatozoa from Sertoli cells at spermiation is controlled by modifications in arrangement of actin cytoskeletons at the apical ectoplasmic specialization (109). The disruption and mislocalization of actin proteins did not only interfere with testicular homeostasis but lead to untimely release of spermatids into the seminiferous epithelium and are consequently trapped within seminiferous epithelium. These studies confirm that through the action of BPA on actin cytoskeleton, Sertoli cell phagocytic function and testicular homeostasis are impaired. The description of the effects of bisphenols on Sertoli cells and male reproductive health is represented in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Schematic description of the effects of bisphenols on Sertoli cells and male reproductive health.
The Action of Bisphenols on Sertoli Cells and the Defense of Testicular Immunity
Developing germ cells within the seminiferous epithelium are shielded by Sertoli cells being immune privileged cells (110). They perform this critical role by secreting chemicals that can suppress stimulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and growth of B and T lymphocytes (111). Previous studies show that they synthesize complement inhibitors (112), and endured exposure to antigen (113). In addition, they secrete several protective factors that perform a critical function in immunomodulation and protection of spermatogonia and spermatids (111, 112, 114). Moreover, galectin-1, a highly conserved β-galactosidase-binding protein, capable of inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokine activation was also discovered in Sertoli cells (115). Sertoli cells are a primary target of BPA and its analogs BPE and BPS impair its functions (19, 20, 95). The impairment of Sertoli cells defensive and immune functions is highly critical to the testes and male reproductive health because it predisposes developing germ cells to external attack. Despite varying dosages and strains of animals used in investigating the effects of bisphenols on Sertoli cells, all studies confirm the negative effect of bisphenols on Sertoli cells, especially during the neonatal window of development.
Action Mechanism of the Effects of Bisphenol on Sertoli Cells
Bisphenols are endocrine disruptors that elicit their impact via affinity with estrogen, androgen, or thyroid hormone receptors (88). These steroid receptors are expressed in Sertoli cells (116, 117). The exposure of fetal rats to BPA reportedly activated Raf1 and p-ERK1/2 in the testes while further evaluation indicated increased level of Raf1 and ERK1/2 proteins in Sertoli cells in response to BPA exposure (118). A study also established that disruption of Sertoli cell tight junction barrier by BPA was accompanied by upregulation of p-ERK in Sertoli cells (19). Another study demonstrated that upregulation of pERK1/2 in cultured Sertoli cells with established junctional barrier declined to lowest level following BPA withdrawal, indicating the involvement of ERK1/2 in BPA induced disruption of Sertoli cell tight junction barrier (119). Although PD98059, an inhibitor of ERK, suppresses the BPA-induced ERK1/2 upregulation in Sertoli cells (120), whether the same inhibitor can repress other effects of BPA on rat and human Sertoli cells remains unknown. Information regarding the mechanism of BPA analogs on Sertoli cells is lacking. Therefore, studies regarding whether BPA analogs have the same or different mechanisms of action on Sertoli cells is necessary. Nonetheless, these findings indicated that BPA elicits its effects on Sertoli cells via the estrogen-ERK signaling pathway.
Bisphenol Effects on Germ Cells and Spermatogenesis
Differentiation process by which spermatogonial stem cells become full developed spermatozoa is called Spermatogenesis (121) Spermatogonial stem cells experience mitotic and meiotic cell divisions to become functional spermatozoa (121). The quality of germ cells largely determines the fertility of males. Meanwhile, research findings have shown the negative impacts of bisphenols on different growth stages of male germ cells (121–124). BPA concentrations of 10 and 100 μM reportedly induced apoptosis, meiotic abnormalities, and altered stemness properties of ICR (CD-1) and C57BL/6-TG-EGFP mice spermatogonial stem cells cultured for 1 week (121). In the same study, BPA inhibited proliferation and induced alterations in testicular germ cells. Similar findings were reported in another study wherein BPA decreased the density and survival rate of rat spermatozoa (122). Contrary to earlier reports (19) that bisphenols only elicit effects on neonatal males, it was demonstrated in a more recent finding that BPA caused DNA damage, reduced sperm count, and motility in adult rats (123). This study was also supported by a recent finding that BPA through IFNβ-XAF1-XIAP signaling pathway caused germ cell apoptosis in adult mice (125). The incidence of hypomethylation was discovered in the spermatozoa of neonatal males exposed to 2.4 μg of BPA/ pup. Another recent study found that BPA, BPE, and BPS at concentrations of 0.5, 20, and 50 μg/kg/day, respectively, induced oxidative stress and apoptosis, altered the transition of germ cell stages (1–VI, VII, and VIII), caused spermatogenic defects, and decreased sperm motility (126). The study further used in utero exposure to confirm that lower concentration of BPE and BPS (between calculated human exposure and no adverse effect doses of BPA) are sufficient to interrupt germ cell differentiation in males. By implication, BPE and BPS are not safe alternatives to BPA in terms of the threat they pose to male reproductive health. The same authors also reported in their earlier study that BPA (10 mg/kgbw), BPE (50 μg/kgbw), and BPS (10 mg/kgbw) caused developmental distortion during spermatogenesis, disrupted male germ cell differentiation, induced germ cell apoptosis and DNA breaks in pachytene spermatocytes in mice (127). BPA, BPB, BPF, and BPS at dosages of 50 μg/L abated the number of germ cells (spermatocytes and spermatids), reduced sperm motility, and daily sperm production (128). This condition represents a critical situation in male reproductive health. In addition, 2 and 20 μg/kgbw of BPA induced oxidative stress in epididymal spermatozoa, caused abnormalities in sperm morphology, and decreased epididymal sperm counts and motility (129). When mice were administered 50 mg/kg/day of BPA, the seminiferous tubule contained a lower number of germ cells and undifferentiated germ cells (130). BPS at a dosage of 50 μg/L induced the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the apoptosis in germ cells (131). Another in vivo study that investigated the effect of 1, 5, and 100 mg/kg body weight of BPA in rats observed absence of germ cells within seminiferous tubules. In addition, the seminiferous epithelia appeared to disintegrate and germ cells were disengaged from Sertoli cells. There were no germ cells in the epididymis but filled with cellular debris (132). In another study that bordered on the impact of BPA on male germ cells using chickens, the results showed that male chickens orally administered BPA dosage of 2 mg/kg body weight every 2 days for 23 weeks had smaller seminiferous tubules exhibiting constrained spermatogenesis (133). The induction of ROS, undifferentiated germ cells, and empty epididymal tubules are indicators of impaired spermatogenesis. These alterations attributed to BPA and its analogs are not only impairments of spermatogenesis but also represent threats to male reproductive health. The effects of bisphenols on germ cells are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3. Effect of bisphenols on germ cells.
The Effects of Bisphenols on Sperm Functions
Clinical data consistently revealed an adverse association between BPA exposure and sperm function. Decreased sperm counts and motility observed in occupationally exposed men (138) and infertile patients (139) positively correlated with their urinary BPA concentration. Additionally, an investigation involving middle aged men in Denmark showed lower sperm motility in persons in the upper percentile of urinary BPA concentration compared to those in lower percentile (140). Animal studies on impact of prenatal or neonatal exposure to BPA on spermatozoa showed deleterious aftermath on sperm production in adulthood. For example, the seminiferous tubule of ICR mice and Holtzman rats exposed to low concentration of BPA in utero contained reduced number of elongated spermatids and reduced sperm counts (134). The time taken for copulation in F1, F2, and F3 generations of the male offspring of rats exposed to 1.2 and 2.4 μg of BPA was significantly higher compared to that of their control counterparts in respective generation (135). Sperm motility, viability, mitochondrial functions, and intracellular ATP levels have been reported to be negatively affected by BPA through activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and protein kinase-A pathways (136). A study which investigated the effect of BPA on sperm function revealed that in utero exposure of male vesper mice to BPA at 40, 80, and 200 μg/kg/day altered sperm membrane integrity and motility (141). In addition, pubertal exposure of C57BL/6J male mice to BPA at 50 mg/kg/day concentration caused deformity in ~9% of sperm population compared to the control group (142). The sperm acrosome integrity of postnatal day 50 male Wistar rats exposed to 5 and 25 mg/kg/day of BPA decreased by 8 and 16%, respectively (72). Similarly, same concentrations reduced sperm plasma membrane integrity by 2% (72). Capacitation-associated proteins in spermatozoa relates to male fertility (143, 144), unfortunately, these proteins are downregulated by BPA (145). Maternal transfer of BPA during nursing was reported caused impairment of spermatozoa in male offspring (146). BPA concentrations of 5 and 50 mg/kg/day reduced sperm motility and intracellular ATP levels of ICR mice (147). In another experiment in which the effect of BPA on sperm function was investigated, BPA concentrations of 50 and 250 μg/kg/day significantly decreased the acrosome reaction which is an indicator of fertilizing ability of the sperm in mice (148). These studies aimed at evaluating the impacts of BPA on male reproductive health and consistently indicated that exposure to low doses of BPA across all developmental stages affected sperm production and fertilizing quality. Although there were differences in exposure windows, period of time, and species investigated, effects unanimously noticed included reduced sperm number, stimulation of sperm apoptosis and oxidative stress (72, 136, 141–148). A description of the effect of bisphenols on germ cells is shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4. Schematic description of the effects of bisphenols on germ cell and male fertility.
Bisphenols Are Related to Transgenerational Male Reproductive Health Disorders
Bisphenols are both genotoxic and epigenotoxic (149). The transgenerational inheritance of the effects of endocrine disruptors has been demonstrated in a series of studies (135, 137, 147, 149, 150). A recently published study demonstrated that paternal exposure to BPA during spermatogenesis markedly modified sperm genetic materials and F1 embryo (149). Our previous study indicated that effects of BPA were vertically transferred to sperm of F1 mice after gestational exposure (143). In another study (137), gestational exposure to BPA caused functional and proteomic modifications in F1 capacitated spermatozoa of adult mice. Epigenetic mechanisms are believed to be responsible for these transgenerational effects (151). Epigenetic modification in spermatozoa and other testicular cells could occur via histone modifications, DNA methylation, and noncoding RNAs (151, 152). Recently, it was discovered that the impacts of BPA could be transgenerational and multigenerational via DNA methylation (141). During DNA methylation, a methyl group is added to the cytosine base within a CpG dinucleotide, and methylation is always connected to transcription subjugation (153). Histone modification involves changing the chromatin organization by substituting DNA interaction with other histones, thereby accelerating or reducing transcription chances (154). Noncoding RNAs, including small and long, are involved in chromatin function and the modulation of gene expression through gene silencing or activation (155, 156). Global hypomethylation in human spermatozoa (157) and zebrafish testes have been reported to be caused by BPA (157, 158). In the same manner, BPA has been implicated in hypermethylation of mouse spermatocytes (159). A decrease in histone acetylation in rat testes was observed following long-term exposure to a low concentration of BPA (160), while increase in histone acetylation in zebrafish testes accompanied exposure to high dose of BPA (161). These reports indicate that bisphenols, especially BPA, threaten the reproductive health of direct contact males and successive generations.
Action Mechanisms of Bisphenols on Germ Cells
BPA and its derivatives exert their effects on different cells and tissues via varying mechanisms and signaling pathways. The effect of exposure to BPA is instant and prompt although observed consequence on gene expression could be delayed by action of the nuclear hormone receptor (36, 162). The mechanism involved in the action of bisphenols on varying cell types is becoming clearer based on recent research findings. The quality and features of receptors implicated in the onset of effect signaling sometimes differ from one cell to the other but are usually associated with those of nuclear hormone receptor-like protein (36). It is generally known that bisphenols possess estrogenic and antiandrogens properties competent of interfering with hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, especially BPA (11, 32, 52, 163). The structural characteristics of BPA aid its capability to bind with both estrogen receptor types (ERα and ERβ) (17, 164, 165). Germ cells of all developmental stages of rodents and man are known to express ERα and ERβ. As a selective ER modulator, BPA can behave as estrogen agonist or antagonist depending on cell type (166). The activities of bisphenols via estrogen receptors is supported by several studies (36, 167, 168). Through binding to GPER/GPR30, BPA can produce rapid and impactful effects in germ cells (90, 169, 170). Moreover, it was recently reported that IFNβ-XAF1-XIAP pathways mediated BPA induced male germ cell apoptosis in adult mice (125). The multiple pathways involved in the effect of bisphenols, especially BPA, on male germ cells may be why it affects both neonatal and adult rat germ cells, while significant effects of BPA were mainly observed in the Sertoli cells of neonatal rats in most studies.
Bisphenols Effect on Peritubular Myoid Cells
Peritubular myoid cells are smooth muscle cells that surround the seminiferous tubule in the testis. They are contractile cells which propel spermatozoa to the caput portion of the epididymis (171, 172). Earlier finding also indicated that testosterone-regulated glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) expression by peritubular myoid cells contributes to the maintenance of spermatogonial stem cell (172). They secrete components of the basement membrane such as fibronectin, collagens, proteoglycans, and entactin (173). In addition, communication between the peritubular myoid and the Sertoli cells is required for the formation of basal lamina during postnatal development (174).
Meanwhile, it has been reported that gestational exposure of female ICR mice to 100 nmol/l per day from gestational day 0 to the end of lactation resulted in apoptosis and mitochondrial vacuolation of peritubular myoid cells of the male pups (175). In another study, an ultrastructural analysis of the testes of adult monkeys (marmosets) exposed to 12.5 and 25 μg/kgbw/day showed the presence of vacuoles in mitochondria of peritubular myoid cells. These reports suggest BPA could interfere with the sperm transport in exposed males. While the effect of bisphenols on Leydig, Sertoli, germ, and peritubular myoid cells are becoming better understood, the impacts on other testicular cell types such as nerve, blood, and lymphatic endothelial cells have not been studied. Therefore, investigation into the effects of bisphenols on these cells is needed, thus providing a roadmap for future studies.
Future Perspectives
For decades, the impact of low doses of bisphenols on male reproduction has been disputed. While some studies have reported that the administration of bisphenols at low doses does not impact vital alteration in reproductive qualities, other revealed varying degree of harm they unleash on male fertility. In this review, we have shown that bisphenols represent threats to male reproductive health through their actions on Leydig, Sertoli, and germ cells. However, bisphenols are crucial chemicals in household chemical products and plastics industry and are still being used in the production of consumer products around the world due to difficulties in developing economical and safe alternatives (176). It is worthy of note that some of the evidence reported in animal studies may not have same effects on humans for reasons such as stage of development at exposure, cocktail effect, and difference in metabolic process. Therefore, future research should focus on the clarification of the extrapolation of human risk assessment data from rodents due to varying responses to bisphenols among different strains. Secondly, testes are complex organs housing distinct cells that respond to bisphenols differently via varying mechanisms, therefore, holistic studies that simultaneously evaluate the response of Leydig, Sertoli, and germ cells to the same dosages of bisphenols and mechanisms involved are greatly needed. In addition, other testicular cells such as peritubular cells, macrophages, other immune cells, and vasculature should be included among priorities in the study of effect of bisphenols on testicular cells. Fortunately, some approaches have been suggested toward the suppression of BPA toxicities. The pharmacological inhibition of ERKI/2 could be considered a target for mitigating the effects of bisphenols in testicular cells. In addition, producers in real situation do not strictly adhere to a prescribed quantity or dosage by regulatory bodies because they may not provide the desired quality. While the scientific consensus indicates that at a cellular level, BPA, and its analogs alter testicular cell development and functions at low, environmentally relevant doses, future studies should investigate mitigation to protect human health and the environment.
Author Contributions
EA and MR wrote the manuscript. M-GP conceived the innovations in the manuscript and edited it. All authors thoroughly revised the manuscript and approved its submission.
Funding
This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (Project No. NRF2018R1A6A1A03025159). EA was supported by the Korea Research Fellowship Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (Grant No. 2019H1D3A1A01071117).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Sumner RN, Tomlinson M, Craigon J, England GCW, Lea RG. Independent and combined effects of diethylhexyl phthalate and polychlorinated biphenyl 153 on sperm quality in the human and dog. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:3409. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39913-9
2. Skakkebaek NE, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Buck Louis GM, Toppari J, Andersson AM, Eisenberg ML, et al. Male reproductive disorders and fertility trends: influences of environment and genetic susceptibility. Physiol Rev. (2016) 96:55–97. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00017.2015
3. World Health Organization. Programme of Maternal and Child Health and Family Planning Unit? Infertility: a tabulation of available data on prevalence of primary and secondary infertility. World Health Organization. (1991). 72 p. Available online at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/59769
4. Cui W. Mother or nothing: the agony of infertility. Bull World Health Organ. (2010) 88:881–2. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.011210
5. Hamada A, Esteves SC, Agarwal A. The role of contemporary andrology in unraveling the mystery of unexplained male infertility. Open Reprod Sci J. (2011) 4:27–41. doi: 10.2174/1874255601103010027
6. Akingbemi BT, Sottas CM, Koulova AI, Klinefelter GR, Hardy MP. Inhibition of testicular steroidogenesis by the xenoestrogen bisphenol A is associated with reduced pituitary luteinizing hormone secretion and decreased steroidogenic enzyme gene expression in rat Leydig cells. Endocrinology. (2004) 145:592–603. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-1174
7. Huang YQ, Wong CKC, Zheng JS, Bouwman H, Barra R, Wahlström B, et al. Bisphenol A (BPA) in China: a review of sources, environmental levels, and potential human health impacts. Environ Int. (2011) 42:91–9. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.04.010
8. EFSA. Scientific Opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of bisphenol A (BPA) in foodstuffs. EFSA J. (2015) 13:3978 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.3978
9. Vandenberg LN. Exposure to bisphenol A in Canada: invoking the precautionary principle. CMAJ. (2011) 183:1265–70. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101408
10. Rochester JR. Bisphenol A and human health: a review of the literature. Reprod Toxicol. (2013) 42:132–55. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.08.008
11. Kitamura S, Suzuki T, Sanoh S, Kohta R, Jinno N, Sugihara K, et al. Comparative study of the endocrine-disrupting activity of bisphenol A and 19 related compounds, Toxicol Sci. (2005) 84:249–59. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfi074
12. Clark E. Sulfolane and sulfones. In: Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons (2000). p. 141–60.
13. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Potential Designated Chemicals: p,p'-Bisphenols and Diglycidyl Ethers of p,p'-Bisphenols. (2012). Available online at: https://biomonitoring.ca.gov/sites/default/files/downloads/110812Bisphenols.pdf
14. Liao C, Kannan K. A survey of alkylphenols, bisphenols, and triclosan in personal care products from China and the United States. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. (2014) 67:50–9. doi: 10.1007/s00244-014-0016-8
15. Liao C, Kannan K. Concentrations and profiles of bisphenol A and other bisphenol analogues in foodstuffs from the United States and their implications for human exposure. J Agric Food Chem. (2013) 61:4655–62. doi: 10.1021/jf400445n
16. Centers for Disease Control Prevention. Fourth Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals, Updated Tables. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2018). Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport
17. Rahman MS, Pang MG. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of bisphenol A action in spermatozoa. Clin Exp Reprod Med. (2019) 46:99–106. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2019.00276
18. Matuszczak E, Komarowska MD, Debek W, Hermanowicz A. The impact of bisphenol A on fertility, reproductive system, and development: a review of the literature. Int J Endocrinol. (2019) 2019:4068717. doi: 10.1155/2019/4068717
19. Li MW, Mruk DD, Lee WM, Cheng CY. Disruption of the blood-testis barrier integrity by bisphenol A in vitro: is this a suitable model for studying blood-testis barrier dynamics? Int J Biochem Cell Biol. (2009) 41:2302–14. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.05.016
20. Gao Y, Mruk DD, Cheng CY. Sertoli cells are the target of environmental toxicants in the testis - a mechanistic and therapeutic insight. Expert Opin Ther Targets. (2015) 19:1073–90. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2015.1039513
21. Fujisawa M. Regulation of testicular function by cell-to-cell interaction. Reprod Med Biol. (2006) 5:9–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0578.2006.00118.x
22. Svingen T, Koopman P. Building the mammalian testis: origins, differentiation, and assembly of the component cell populations. Genes Dev. (2013) 27:2409–26. doi: 10.1101/gad.228080.113
23. Costello LC, Franklin RB. Testosterone, prolactin, and oncogenic regulation of the prostate gland. A new concept: Testosterone-independent malignancy is the development of prolactin-dependent malignancy. Oncol Rev. (2018) 12:356. doi: 10.4081/oncol.2018.356
24. Wang F, Han D. Sertoli Cell Phagocytosis: An Essential Event for Spermatogenesis. In: Male Reproductive Health. Intech Open (2019). p. 126–319. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.86808
25. Petersen C, Soder O. The sertoli cell–a hormonal target and 'super' nurse for germ cells that determines testicular size. Horm Res. (2006) 66:153–61. doi: 10.1159/000094142
26. Grootegoed JA, Jansen R, van Der Molen HJ. The role of glucose, pyruvate and lactate in ATP production by rat spermatocytes and spermatids. Biochim Biophys Acta. (1984) 767:248–56. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(84)90194-4
27. Jutte NH, Grootegoed JA, Rommerts FF, van Der Molen HJ. Exogenous lactate is essential for metabolic activities in isolated rat spermatocytes and spermatids. J Reprod Fertil. (1981) 62:399–405. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0620399
28. Jutte NH, Jansen R, Grootegoed JA, Rommerts FF, Clausen OP, van Der Molen HJ. Regulation of survival of rat pachytene spermatocytes by lactate supply from Sertoli cells. J Reprod Fertil. (1982) 65:431–8. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0650431
29. Jutte NH, Jansen R, Grootegoed JA, Rommerts FF, van Der Molen HJ. FSH stimulation of the production of pyruvate and lactate by rat Sertoli cells may be involved in hormonal regulation of spermatogenesis. J Reprod Fertil. (1983) 68:219–26. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0680219
30. Inoue S, Tomasini R, Rufini A, Elia AJ, Agostini M, Amelio I, et al. TAp73 is required for spermatogenesis and the maintenance of male fertility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2014) 111:1843–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323416111
31. Stukenborg JB, Kjartansdóttir KR, Reda A, Colon E, Albersmeier JP, Söder O. Male germ cell development in humans. Horm Res Paediatr. (2014) 81:2–12. doi: 10.1159/000355599
32. Almeida S, Raposo A, Almeida-Gonzalez M, Carrascosa C. Bisphenol A: food exposure and impact on human health. Comp Rev Food Sci Food Saf. (2018) 17:1503–17. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12388
33. Shanle EK, Xu W. Endocrine disrupting chemicals targeting estrogen receptor signaling: identification and mechanisms of action. Chem Res Toxicol. (2011) 24:6–19. doi: 10.1021/tx100231n
34. Heldring N, Pike A, Andersson S, Matthews J, Cheng G, Hartman J, et al. Estrogen receptors: how do they signal and what are their targets. Physiol Rev. (2007) 87:905–31 doi: 10.1152/physrev.00026.2006
35. Murata M, Kang JH. Bisphenol A (BPA) and cell signaling pathways. Biotechnol Adv. (2018) 36:311–27. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.12.002
36. Wetherill YB, Akingbemi BT, Kanno J, McLachlan JA, Nadal A, Sonnenschein C, et al. in vitro molecular mechanisms of bisphenol A action. Reprod Toxicol. (2007) 24:178–98. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.05.010
37. Watson CS, Bulayeva NN, Wozniak AL, Alyea RA. Xenoestrogens are potent activators of nongenomic estrogenic responses. Steroids. (2207) 72:124–34. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2006.11.002
38. Griswold SL, Behringer RR. Fetal Leydig cell origin and development. Sex Dev. (2009) 3:1–15. doi: 10.1159/000200077
39. Zirkin BR, Papadopoulos V. Leydig cells: formation, function, and regulation. Biol Reprod. (2018) 99:101–11. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioy059
40. O'Shaughnessy PJ, Fowler PA. Endocrinology of the mammalian fetal testis. Reproduction. (2011) 141:37–46. doi: 10.1530/REP-10-0365
41. Shima Y, Miyabayashi K, Haraguchi S, Arakawa T, Otake H, Baba T, et al. Contribution of Leydig and Sertoli cells to testosterone production in mouse fetal testes. Mol Endocrinol. (2013) 27:63–73. doi: 10.1210/me.2012-1256
42. Caron KM, Soo SC, Wetsel WC, Stocco DM, Clark BJ, Parker KL. Targeted disruption of the mouse gene encoding steroidogenic acute regulatory protein provides insights into congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1997) 94:11540–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.21.11540
43. Foresta C, Zuccarello D, Garolla A, Ferlin A. Role of hormones, genes, and environment in human cryptorchidism. Endocr Rev. (2008) 29:560–80. doi: 10.1210/er.2007-0042
44. Benzi TSCG, Costa WS, Sampaio FJ, Favorito LA. Inguinoscrotal stage of testicular descent: analysis in 217 human fetuses. J Pediatr Urol. (2020) 16:198–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.01.016
45. Hughes IA, Acerini CL. Factors controlling testis descent. Eur J Endocrinol. (2008) 159(Suppl 1):S75–82. doi: 10.1530/EJE-08-0458
46. Virtanen HE1, Bjerknes R, Cortes D, Jørgensen N, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Thorsson AV, et al. Cryptorchidism: classification, prevalence and long-term consequences. Acta Paediat. (2007) 96:611–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00241.x
47. Jambor T, Kovacikova E, Greifova H, Kovacik A, Libova L, Lukac N. Assessment of the effective impact of bisphenols on mitochondrial activity and steroidogenesis in a dose-dependency in mice TM3 Leydig cells. Physiol Res. (2019) 68:689–93. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.934200
48. N'Tumba-Byn T, Moison D, Lacroix M, Lecureuil C, Lesage L, Prud'homme SM. Differential effects of bisphenol A and diethylstilbestrol on human, rat and mouse fetal leydig cell function. PLoS One. (2012) 7:e51579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051579
49. Maamar MB, Lesné L, DesdoitsLethimonier C, Coiffec I, Lassurguère J, Lavoué V, et al. An investigation of the endocrine disruptive effects of bisphenol A in human and rat fetal testes. PLoS One. (2015) 10:e0117226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117226
50. Gonçalves GD, Semprebon SC, Biazi BI, Mantovani MS, Fernandes GSA. Bisphenol A reduces testosterone production in TM3 Leydig cells independently of its effects on cell death and mitochondrial membrane potential. Reprod Toxicol. (2018) 76:26–34. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2017.12.002
51. Kim JY, Han EH, Kim HG, Oh KN, Kim SK, Lee KY, et al. Bisphenol A-induced aromatase activation is mediated by cyclooxygenase-2 upregulation in rat testicular Leydig cells. Toxicol Lett. (2010) 193:200–8. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.01.011
52. Eladak S, Grisin T, Moison D1, Guerquin MJ, N'Tumba-Byn T, Pozzi-Gaudin S, et al. A new chapter in the bisphenol A story: bisphenol S and bisphenol F are not safe alternatives to this compound. Fertil Steril. (2015) 103:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.11.005
53. Fénichel P, Lahlou N, Coquillard P, Pugeat M, Pacini P, Panaïa-Ferrari P, et al. Cord blood Insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3) is reduced in idiopathic cryptorchidism: the missing link between fetal exposure and endocrine disruptors like bisphenol A and undescended testis? In: Oral Communication Presented at The Endocrine Society's Annual Meeting San Francisco June 15-18. San Francisco, CA (2013).
54. Desdoits-Lethimonier C, Lesné L, Gaudriault P, Zalko D, Antignac JP, Deceuninck Y, et al. Parallel assessment of the effects of bisphenol A and several of its analogs on the adult human testis. Hum Reprod. (2017) 32:1465–73. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex093
55. Feng Y, Yin J, Jiao Z, Shi J, Li M, Shao B. Bisphenol AF may cause testosterone reduction by directly affecting testis function in adult male rats. Toxicol Lett. (2012) 211:201–9. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.03.802
56. Nakamura D, Yanagiba Y, Duan Z, Ito Y, Okamura A, Asaeda N, et al. Bisphenol A may cause testosterone reduction by adversely affecting both testis and pituitary systems similar to estradiol. Toxicol Lett. (2010) 194:16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.02.002
57. Lv Y, Li L, Fang Y, Chen P, Wu S, Chen X. In utero exposure to bisphenol A disrupts fetal testis development in rats. Environ Pollut. (2019) 246:217–24. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.006
58. Tanaka M, Nakaya S, Katayama M, Leffers H, Nozawa S, Nakazawa R, et al. Effect of prenatal exposure to bisphenol A on the serum testosterone concentration of rats at birth. Hum Exp Toxicol. (2006) 25:369–73. doi: 10.1191/0960327106ht638oa
59. Nanjappa MK, Simon L, Akingbemi BT. The industrial chemical bisphenol A (BPA) interferes with proliferative activity and development of steroidogenic capacity in rat Leydig cells. Biol Reprod. (2012) 86:1–12. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.111.095349
60. Choi H, Kim J, Im Y, Lee S, Kim Y. The association between some endocrine disruptors and hypospadias in biological samples. J Environ Sci Health A. (2012) 47:2173–9. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2012.680387
61. Vom Saal FS, Prins GS, Welshons WV. Report of very low real world exposure to bisphenol A is unwarranted based on a lack of data and flawed assumptions. Toxicol Sci. (2012) 125:318–20; doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr273
62. Mazur CS, Kenneke JF, Hess-Wilson JK, Lipscomb JC. Differences between human and rat intestinal and hepatic bisphenol A glucuronidation and the influence of alamethicin on in vitro kinetic measurements. Drug Metab Dispos. (2010) 38:2232–8. doi: 10.1124/dmd.110.034819
63. Taylor JA, Vom Saal FS, Welshons WV, Drury B, Rottinghaus G, Hunt PA, et al. Similarity of bisphenol A pharmacokinetics in rhesus monkeys and mice: relevance for human exposure. Environ Health Perspect. (2011) 119:422–30. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002514
64. Niedzielski JK, Oszukowska E, Słowikowska-Hilczer J. Undescended testis - current trends and guidelines: a review of the literature. Arch Med Sci. (2016) 12:3:667–77. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.59940
65. Bay K, Asklund C, Skakkebaek NE, Andersson AM. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: possible role of endocrine disrupters. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2006) 20:77–90. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2005.09.004
66. Skakkebaek NE, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Main KM. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects. Hum Reprod. (2001) 16:972–8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.5.972
67. Guminska A, Oszukowska E, Kuzanski W, Sosnowski M, Wolski JK, Walczak-Jedrzejowska R. Less advanced testicular organogenesis is associated with a higher incidence of germ cell neoplasia. Int J Androl. (2010) 33:153–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.00981.x
68. Hu GX, Lian QQ, Ge RS, Hardy DO, Li XK. Phthalate-induced testicular dysgenesis syndrome: Leydig cell influence. Trends Endocrinol Metab. (2009) 20:139–45. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2008.12.001
69. Mahood IK, Hallmark N, McKinnell C, Walker M, Fisher JS, Sharpe RM. Abnormal Leydig Cell aggregation in the fetal testis of rats exposed to di (n-butyl) phthalate and its possible role in testicular dysgenesis. Endocrinology. (2005) 146:613–23. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-0671
70. Joensen UN, Jørgensen N, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Skakkebaek NE. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome and leydig cell function. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. (2008) 102:155–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2007.00197.x
71. Rahman MS, Kwon WS, Lee JS, Yoon SJ, Ryu BY, Pang MG. Bisphenol-A affects male fertility via fertility-related proteins in spermatozoa. Sci Rep. (2015) 5:9169. doi: 10.1038/srep09169
72. Wisniewski P, Romano RM, Kizys MM, Oliveira KC, Kasamatsu T, Giannocco G, et al. Adult exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) in Wistar rats reduces sperm quality with disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis. Toxicology. (2015) 329:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2015.01.002
73. Lucas B, Fields C, Hofmann MC. Signaling pathways in spermatogonial stem cells and their disruption by toxicants. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. (2009) 87:35–42. doi: 10.1002/bdrc.20145
74. Komarowska MD, Hermanowicz A, Czyzewska U, Milewski R, Matuszczak E, Miltyk W. Serum bisphenol A level in boys with cryptorchidism: a step to male infertility. Int J Endocrinol. (2015) 2015:973154. doi: 10.1155/2015/973154
75. Bosland MC, Mahmoud AM. Hormones and prostate carcinogenesis: androgens and estrogens. J Carcinog. (2011) 10:33 doi: 10.4103/1477-3163.90678
76. Costello LC, Franklin RB. Concepts of citrate production and secretion by prostate: 2. Hormonal relationships in normal and neoplastic prostate. Prostate. (1991) 19:181–205. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990190302
77. Costello LC, Franklin RB. Testosterone and prolactin regulation of metabolic genes and citrate metabolism of prostate epithelial cells. Horm Metabol Res. (2002) 34:417–24. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33598
78. Tarapore P, Ying J, Ouyang B, Burke B, Bracken B, Ho S-M. Exposure to bisphenol A correlates with early-onset prostate cancer and promotes centrosome amplification and anchorage-independent growth in vitro. PLoS One. (2014) 9:e90332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090332
79. Wu S, Huang D, Su Xin, Yan H, Wu J, Sun Z. Oral exposure to low-dose bisphenol A induces hyperplasia of dorsolateral prostate and upregulates EGFR expression in adult Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicol Ind Health. (2019) 35:647–59. doi: 10.1177/0748233719885565
80. Prins GS, Hu WY, Shi GB, Hu DP, Majumdar S, Li G, et al. Bisphenol A promotes human prostate stem-progenitor cell self-renewal and increases in vivo carcinogenesis in human prostate epithelium. Endocrinology. (2014) 155:805–17. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-1955
81. Prins GS, Hu WY, Xie L, Shi GB, Hu DP, Birch L, et al. Evaluation of bisphenol A (BPA) exposures on prostate stem cell homeostasis and prostate cancer risk in the NCTR-Sprague-Dawley rat: an NIEHS/FDA CLARITY-BPA Consortium Study. Environ Health Perspect. (2018) 126:117001. doi: 10.1289/EHP3953
82. Abney TO Myers RB17-Estradiol inhibition of Leydig cell regenerationin the ethane dimethylsulfonate-treated mature rat. J Androl. (1991) 12:295–304.
83. Paech K, Webb P, Kuiper GG, Nilsson S, Gustafsson J, Kushner PJ, et al. Differential ligand activation of estrogen receptors ERα and ERβ atAP1 sites. Science. (1997) 277:1508–10. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5331.1508
84. Rosenfeld CS, Ganjam VK, Taylor JA, Yuan X, Stiehr JR, Hardy MP, et al. Transcription and translation of estrogen receptor-in the male reproductive tract of estrogen receptor-αknock-out and wild-type mice. Endocrinology. (1998) 139:2982–7. doi: 10.1210/endo.139.6.6028
85. Saunders PT, Fisher JS, Sharpe RM, Millar MR1. Expression of oestrogen receptorβ (ERβ) occurs in multiple cell types, including some germ cells, in the rat testis. J Endocrinol. (998) 156:R13–7. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.156r013
86. van Pelt AM, de Rooij DG, van der Burg B, van der Saag PT, Gustafsson JA, Kuiper GG. Ontogeny of estrogen receptor-β expression in rat testis. Endocrinology. (1999) 140:478–48. doi: 10.1210/endo.140.1.6438
87. Gaskell TL, Robinson LL, Groome NP, Anderson RA, Saunders PT. Differential expression of two estrogen receptor beta isoforms in the human fetal testis during the second trimester of pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2003) 88:424–32. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-020811
88. Vandenberg LN, Maffini MV, Sonnenschein C, Rubin BS, Soto AM. Bisphenol-A and the great divide: a review of controversies in the field of endocrine disruption. Endocr Rev. (2009) 30:75–95. doi: 10.1210/er.2008-0021
89. Bouskine A, Nebout M, Brucker-Davis F, Benahmed M, Fenichel P. Low doses of bisphenol A promote human seminoma cell proliferation by activating PKA and PKG via a membrane G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor. Environ Health Perspect. (2009) 117:1053–8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0800367
90. Chevalier N, Vega A, Bouskine A, Siddeek B, Michiels JF, Chevallier D, et al. GPR30, the non-classical membrane G protein related estrogen receptor, is over-expressed in human seminoma and promotes seminoma cell proliferation. PLoS One. (2012) 7:e34672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034672
91. Takayanagi S, Tokunaga T, Liu X, Okada H, Matsushima A, Shimohigashi Y. Endocrine disruptor bisphenol A strongly binds to human estrogen-related receptor gamma (ERR gamma) with high constitutive activity. Toxicol Lett. (2006) 167:95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.08.012
92. Lucas TFG, Nascimento AR, Pisolato R, Pimenta MT, Lazari MFM, Porto CS. Receptors and signaling pathways involved in proliferation and differentiation of Sertoli cells. Spermatogenesis. (2014) 4:e28138. doi: 10.4161/spmg.28138
93. Berndtson WE, Thompson TL. Changing relationships between testis size, Sertoli cell number and spermatogenesis in Sprague-Dawley rats. J Androl. (1990) 11:429–35.
94. Orth JM, Gunsalus GL, Lamperti AA. Evidence from Sertoli cell-depleted rats indicates that spermatid number in adults depends on numbers of Sertoli cells produced during perinatal development. Endocrinology. (1988) 122:787–94. doi: 10.1210/endo-122-3-787
95. Maclean JA, Chen MA, Wayne CM, Bruce SR, Rao M, Meistrich ML. Rhox: a new homeobox gene cluster. Cell. (2005) 120:369–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.022
96. Iida H, Maehara K, Doiguchi M, Mori T, Yamada F. Bisphenol A-induced apoptosis of cultured rat Sertoli cells. Reprod Toxicol. (2003) 17:457–64. doi: 10.1016/S0890-6238(03)00034-0
97. Tabuchi Y, Kondo T. cDNA microarray analysis reveals chop-10 plays a key role in Sertoli cell injury induced by bisphenol A. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2003) 305:54–61. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00708-3
98. Oyama Y, Suzuki-Toyota F, Maekawa M, Ito C, Toshimori K. Adverse effects of bisphenol A to spermatogenesis in mice and rats. Arch Histol Cytol. (2004) 67:373–81. doi: 10.1679/aohc.67.373
99. Paduch DA, Hilz S, Grimson A, Schlegel PN, Jedlicka AE, Wright WW. Aberrant gene expression by Sertoli cells in infertile men with Sertoli cell-only syndrome. PLos One. (2019) 14:e0216586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216586
100. Adegoke EO, Wang X, Wang H, Wang C, Zhang H, Zhang G. Selenium (Na2SeO3) upregulates expression of immune genes and blood-testis-barrier constituent proteins of bovine Sertoli cell in vitro. Biol Trace Elem Res. (2018) 185:332–43. doi: 10.1007/s12011-018-1248-7
101. Fiorini C, Tilloy-Ellul A, Chevalier S, Charusel C, Pointis G. Sertoli cell junctional proteins as early targets for different classes of reproductive toxicants. Reprod Toxicol. (2004) 18:413–21. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2004.01.002
102. Tainaka H, Takahashi H, Umezawa M, Tanaka H, Nishimune Y, Oshio S, et al. Evaluation of the testicular toxicity of prenatal exposure to bisphenol A based on microarray analysis combined with MeSH annotation. J Toxicol Sci. (2012) 37:539–48. doi: 10.2131/jts.37.539
103. Su L, Mruk DD, Cheng CY. Drug transporters, the blood-testis barrier, and spermatogenesis. J Endocrinol. (2011) 208:207–23. doi: 10.1677/JOE-10-0363
104. Awal MA, Kurohmaru M, Mizukami T, Andriana BB, Kanai Y, Hayashi Y. Effect of bisphenol-A on the Sertoli cell culture from prepubertal male Wistar rats. J Med Sci. (2002) 2:19–23. doi: 10.3923/jms.2002.19.23
105. Salian S, Doshi T, Vanage G. Neonatal exposure of male rats to bisphenol A impairs fertility and expression of Sertoli cell junctional proteins in the testis. Toxicology. (2009) 265:56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.09.012
106. Xiang X, Dolores DM, Elizabeth IT, Chris KCW, Will ML. Environmental toxicants perturb human Serotli cell adhesive function via changes in F-actin organization medicated by actin regulatory proteins. Hum Reprod. (2014) 29:1279–91. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu011
107. O'Donnell L. Mechanisms of spermiogenesis and spermiation and how they are disturbed. Spermatogenesis. (2015) 4:e979623. doi: 10.4161/21565562.2014.979623
108. Maeda Y, Shiratsuchi A, Namiki M, Nakanishi Y. Inhibition of sperm production in mice by annexin V microinjected into seminiferous tubules: possible etiology of phagocytic clearance of apoptotic spermatogenic cells and male infertility. Cell Death Differ. (2002) 9:742–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401046
109. Li L1, Tang EI, Chen H, Lian Q, Ge R, Silvestrini B, et al. Sperm release at spermiation is regulated by changes in the organization of actin- and microtubule-based cytoskeletons at the apical ectoplasmic specialization-A study using the adjudin model. Endocrinology. (2017) 158:4300–16. doi: 10.1210/en.2017-00660
110. Gurvinder K, Charles RL, Jannette MD. Genetically engineered immune privileged Sertoli cells. Spermatogenesis. (2012) 2:23–31. doi: 10.4161/spmg.19119
111. Mital P, Kaur G, Dufour JM. Immunoprotective Sertoli cells: making allogeneic and xenogeneic transplantation feasible. Reproduction. (2009) 139:495–504. doi: 10.1530/REP-09-0384
112. Doyle TJ, Kaur G, Putrevu SM, Dyson EL, Dyson M, McCunniff WT, et al. Immunoprotective properties of primary sertoli cells in mice: potential functional pathways that confer immune privilege. Biol Reprod. (2012) 86:1–14. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.089425
113. Dufour JM, Hamilton M, Rajotte RV, Korbutt GS. Neonatal porcine Sertoli cells inhibit human natural antibody-mediated lysis. Biol Reprod. (2005) 72:1224–31. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.038315
114. Riccioli A, Starace D, Galli R, Fuso A, Scarpa S, Palombi F, et al. Sertoli cells initiate testicular innate immune responses through TLR activation. J. Immunol. (2006) 177:7122–30. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.7122
115. Chui K, Trivedi A, Cheng CY, Cherbavaz DB, Dazin PF, Huynh AL, et al. Characterization and functionality of proliferative human Sertoli cells. Cell Transplant. (2011) 20:619–35. doi: 10.3727/096368910X536563
116. Gao Y, Lee WM, Cheng CY. Thyroid hormone function in the rat testis. Front Endocrinol. (2014) 5:188. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2014.00188
117. Nakhla AM, Mather JP, Janne OA, Bardin CW. Estrogen and androgen receptors in Sertoli, Leydig, myoid, and epithelial cells: effects of time in culture and cell density. Endocrinology. (1984) 115:121–8. doi: 10.1210/endo-115-1-121
118. Thuillier R, Manku G, Wang Y, Culty M. Changes in MAPK pathway in neonatal and adult testis following fetal estrogen exposure and effects on rat testicular cells. Microsc Res Tech. (2009) 72:773–86. doi: 10.1002/jemt.20756
119. Li MWM, Mruk DD, Lee WM, Cheng CY. Connexin 43 is critical to maintain the homeostasis of blood-testis barrier via its effects on tight junction reassembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2010) 107:17998–8003. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007047107
120. Izumi Y, Yamaguchi K, Ishikawa T, Ando M, Chiba K, Hashimoto H, et al. Molecular changes induced by bisphenol-A in rat Sertoli cell culture. Syst Biol Reprod Med. (2011) 57:228–32. doi: 10.3109/19396368.2011.574248
121. Karmakar PC, Kang HG, Kim YH, Jung SE, Rahman MS, Lee HS. Bisphenol A effects on the functional properties and proteome of testicular germ cells and spermatogonial stem cells in vitro culture model. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:11858. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12195-9
122. Li J, Mao R, Zhou Q, Ding L, Tao J, Ran MM. Exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) in Wistar rats reduces sperm quality with disruption of ERK signal pathway. Toxicol Mech Methods. (2016) 26:180–8. doi: 10.3109/15376516.2016.1139024
123. Tiwari D, Vanage G. Mutagenic effect of Bisphenol A on adult rat male germ cells and their fertility. Reprod Toxicol. (2013) 40:60–8. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.05.013
124. Doshi T, D'souza C, Vanage G. Aberrant DNA methylation at Igf2-H19 imprinting control region in spermatozoa upon neonatal exposure to bisphenol A and its association with post implantation loss. Mol Biol Rep. (2013) 40:4747–57. doi: 10.1007/s11033-013-2571-x
125. Jiang X, Yin L, Zhang N, Han F, Liu WB, Zhang X. Bisphenol A induced male germ cell apoptosis via IFNβ-XAF1-XIAP pathway in adult mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. (2018) 355:247–56. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2018.07.009
126. Shi M, Sekulovski N, MacLean JA, Hayashi K. Prenatal exposure to bisphenol A analogues on male reproductive functions in mice. Toxicol Sci. (2018) 163:620–31. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy061
127. Shi M, Sekulovski N, MacLean JA, Hayashi K. Effects of bisphenol A analogues on reproductive functions in mice. Reprod Toxicol. (2017) 73:280–91. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2017.06.134
128. Ullah A, Pirzada M, Jahan S, Ullah H, Turi N, Ullah W, et al. Impact of low-dose chronic exposure to bisphenol A and its analogue bisphenol B, bisphenol F and bisphenol S on hypothalamo-pituitary testicular activities in adult rats: A focus on the possible hormonal mode of action. Food Chem Toxicol. (2018) 121:24–36. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.08.024
129. Chitra KC, Latchoumycandane C, Mathur PP. Induction of oxidative stress by bisphenol A in the epididymal sperm of rats. Toxicology. (2003) 185:119–27. doi: 10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00597-8
130. Sèdes L, Desdoits-Lethimonier C, Rouaisnel B, Holota H, Thirouard L, Lesne L, et al. Crosstalk between BPA and FXRa signaling pathways lead to alterations of undifferentiated germ cell homeostasis and male fertility disorders. Stem Cell Rep. (2018) 4:944–58. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.08.018
131. Ullah H, Jahan S, Ain QU, Shaheen G, Ahsan N. Effect of bisphenol S exposure on male reproductive system of rats: a histological and biochemical study. Chemosphere. (2016) 152:383–91. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.125
132. Gurmeet KSS, Rosnah I, Normadiah MK, Das S, Mustafa AM. Detrimental effects of BPA on development and functions of the male reproductive system in experimental rats. Exp Clin Sci J. (2014) 13:151–60.
133. Furuya M, Adachi K, Kuwahara S, Ogawa K, Tsukamoto Y. Inhibition of male chick phenotypes and spermatogenesis by bisphenol-A. Life Sci. (2006) 78:1767–76. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.08.016
134. Okada A, Kai O. Effects of estradiol-17β and bisphenol A administered chronically to mice throughout pregnancy and lactation on the male pups' reproductive system. Asian J Androl. (2008) 10:271–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2008.00292.x
135. Salian S, Doshi T, Vanage G. Perinatal exposure of rats to Bisphenol A affects the fertility of male offspring. Life Sci. (2009) 85:742–52. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2009.10.004
136. Rahman MS, Kwon WS, Yoon SJ, Park YJ, Ryu BY, Pang MG. A novel approach to assessing bisphenol-A hazards using an in vitro model system. BMC Genomics. (2016) 17:577. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2979-5
137. Rahman MS, Kwon WS, Ryu DY, Khatun A, Karmakar PC, Ryu BY, et al. Functional and proteomic alterations of F1 capacitated spermatozoa of adult mice following gestational exposure to bisphenol A. J Proteome Res. (2018) 17:524–35. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00668
138. Li DK, Zhou Z, Miao M, He Y, Wang J, Ferber J, et al. Urine bisphenol-A (BPA) level in relation to semen quality. Fertil Steril. (2011) 95:625–30. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.026
139. Meeker JD, Calafat AM, Hauser R. Urinary bisphenol A concentrations in relation to serum thyroid and reproductive hormone levels in men from an infertility clinic. Environ Sci Technol. (2010) 44:1458–63. doi: 10.1021/es9028292
140. Lassen TH, Frederiksen H, Jensen TK, Petersen JH, Joensen UN, Main KM, et al. Urinary bisphenol A levels in young men: association with reproductive hormones and semen quality. Environ Health Perspect. (2014) 122:478–84. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307309
141. Rahman MS, Pang WK, Ryu DY, Park YJ, Pang MG. Multigenerational and transgenerational impact of paternal bisphenol A exposure on male fertility in a mouse model. Hum Reprod. (2020) 35:1740–52. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa139
142. Li Y, Duan F, Yang F, Zhou X, Pan H, Yang L, et al. Pubertal exposure to bisphenol A affects the reproduction of male mice and sex ratio of offspring. J Reprod Contracept. (2015) 26:14–21. doi: 10.7669/j.issn.1001-7844.2015.01.0014
143. Rahman MS, Kwon WS, Pang MG. Prediction of male fertility using capacitation-associated proteins in spermatozoa. Mol Reprod Dev. (2017) 84:749–59. doi: 10.1002/mrd.22810
144. Kwon WS, Rahman MS, Pang MG. Diagnosis and prognosis of male infertility in mammal: the focusing of tyrosine phosphorylation and phosphotyrosine proteins. J Proteome Res. (2014) 13:4505–17. doi: 10.1021/pr500524p
145. Park YJ, Rahman MS, Pang WK, Ryu DY, Kim B, Pang MG. Bisphenol A affects the maturation and fertilization competence of spermatozoa. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. (2020) 196:110512. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110512
146. Kalb AC, Kalb AL, Cardoso TF, Fernandes CG, Corcini CD, Varela AS, et al. Maternal transfer of bisphenol A during nursing causes sperm impairment in male offspring. Arch Environ Contamin Toxicol. (2016) 70:793–801. doi: 10.1007/s00244-015-0199-7
147. Rahman MS, Kwon WS, Karmakar PC, Yoon SJ, Ryu BY, Pang MG Gestational exposure to bisphenol-A affects the function and proteome profile of F1 spermatozoa in adult mice. Environ Health Perspect. (2017) 125:238–24. doi: 10.1289/EHP378
148. Wang HF, Liu M, Li N, Luo T, Zheng LP, Zeng XH. Bisphenol A impairs mature sperm functions by a CatSper-relevant mechanism. Toxicol Sci. (2016) 152:145–54. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfw070
149. Lombó M, Fernández-Díez C, González-Rojo S, Herráez M. Genetic and epigenetic alterations induced by bisphenol A exposure during different periods of spermatogenesis: from spermatozoa to the progeny. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:18029. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54368-8
150. Rahman MS, Pang MG. New biological insights on X and Y chromosome-bearing spermatozoa. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2020) 7:388. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00388
151. Skinner MK. Endocrine disruptors in 2015: epigenetic transgenerational inheritance. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2016) 12:68–70. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2015.206
152. Skinner MK. Endocrine disruptor induction of epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of disease. Mol Cell Endocrinol. (2014) 39:4–12. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2014.07.019
153. Sch ubeler D. Function and information content of DNA methylation. Nature. (2015) 517:321–6. doi: 10.1038/nature14192
154. Xin F, Susiarjo M, Bartolomei MS. Multigenerational and transgenerational effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals: a role for altered epigenetic regulation? Semin Cell Dev Biol. (2015) 43:66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.05.008
155. Campbell M, Kung HJ, Izumiya Y. Long non-coding RNA and epigenetic gene regulation of KSHV. Viruses. (2014) 6:4165–77. doi: 10.3390/v6114165
156. Peschansky VJ, Wahlestedt C. Non-coding RNAs as direct and indirect modulators of epigenetic regulation. Epigenetics. (2014) 9:3–12. doi: 10.4161/epi.27473
157. Miao M, Zhou X, Li Y, Zhang O, Zhou Z, Li, et al. LINE-1 hypomethylation in spermatozoa is associated with Bisphenol A exposure. Andrology. (2014) 2:138–44 doi: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00166.x
158. Laing LV, Viana J, Dempster EL, Trznadel M, Trunkfield LA, Uren Webster TM, et al. Bisphenol A causes reproductive toxicity, decreases dnmt1 transcription, and reduces global DNA methylation in breeding zebrafish (Danio rerio). Epigenetics. (2016) 11:526–38. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2016.1182272
159. Yin L, Dai Y, Jiang X, Liu Y, Chen H, Han F, et al. Role of DNA methylation in bisphenol A exposed mouse spermatocyte. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. (2016) 48:265–71. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2016.11.003
160. Chen Z, Zuo X, He D, Ding S, Xu F, Yang H, et al. Long-term exposure to a “safe” dose of bisphenol A reduced protein acetylation in adult rat testes. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:1–9. doi: 10.1038/srep40337
161. Vogel SA. The politics of plastics: the making unmaking of bisphenol a 'safety'. Am J Public Health. (2009) 99(Suppl 3):559–66. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.159228
162. Farach-Carson MC, Davis PJ. Steroid hormone interactions with target cells: cross talk between membrane and nuclear pathways. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. (2003) 307:839–45. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.055038
163. Khatun A, Rahman MS, Pang MG. Clinical assessment of the male fertility. Obstet Gynecol Sci. (2018) 61:179–91. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.2.179
164. Acconcia F, Pallottini V, Marino M. Molecular mechanisms of action of BPA. Dose Response. (2015) 13:1559325815610582. doi: 10.1177/1559325815610582
165. Rahman MS, Kang KH, Arifuzzaman S, Pang WK, Ryu DY, Song WH, et al. Effect of antioxidants on BPA-induced stress on sperm function in a mouse model. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:10584. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47158-9
166. Wersinger SR, Haisenleder DJ, Lubahn DB, Rissman EF. Steroid feedback on gonadotropin release and pituitary gonadotropin subunit mRNA in mice lacking a functional estrogen receptor alpha. Endocrine. (1999) 11:137–43. doi: 10.1385/ENDO:11:2:137
167. Routledge EJ, White R, Parker MG, Sumpter JP. Differential effects of xenoestrogen on coactivator recruitment by estrogen receptor (ER) alpha and ER beta. J Biol Chem. (2000) 275:35986–93. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006777200
168. Song WH, Mohamed EA, Pang WK, Kang KH, Ryu DY, Rahman MS, et al. Effect of endocrine disruptors on the ratio of X and Y chromosome-bearing live spermatozoa. Reprod Toxicol. (2018) 82:10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2018.09.002
169. Alonso-Magdalena P, Ropero AB, Soriano S, García-Arévalo M, Ripoll C, Fuentes E, et al. Bisphenol-a acts as a potent estrogen via non-classical estrogen triggered pathways. Mol Cell Endocrinol. (2012) 355:201–7. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.12.012
170. Sirianni R Chimento A Ruggiero C Luca A Lappano R Andò S, et al. The novel estrogen receptor, G protein-coupled receptor 30, mediates the proliferative effects induced by 17beta-estradiol on mouse spermatogonial GC-1 cell line. Endocrinology. (2008) 149:5043–51. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1593
171. Maekawa M, Kamimura K, Nagano T. Peritubular myoid cells in the testis: their structure and function. Arch Histol Cytol. (1996) 59:1–13. doi: 10.1679/aohc.59.1
172. Chen LY, Brown PR, Willis WB, Eddy EM. Peritubular myoid cells participate in male mouse spermatogonial stem cell maintenance. Endocrinology. (2014) 155:4964–74 doi: 10.1210/en.2014-1406
173. Díez-Torre A, Silván U, Moreno P, Gumucio J, Aréchaga J. Peritubular myoid cell-derived factors and its potential role in the progression of testicular germ cell tumours. Int J Androl. (2011) 34(4 Pt 2):e252–65 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01168.x
174. Nurmio M, Kallio J, Adam M, Mayerhofer A, Toppari J, Jahnukainen K. Peritubular myoid cells have a role in postnatal testicular growth. Spermatogenesis. (2012) 2:79–87. doi: 10.4161/spmg.20067
175. Liu XL, Chen XY, Wang ZC, Shen T, Zhao H. Effects of exposure to bisphenol A during pregnancy and lactation on the testicular morphology and caspase-3 protein expression of ICR pups. Biomed Rep. (2013) 1:420–4. doi: 10.3892/br.2013.79
Keywords: bisphenol, Sertoli cell, Leydig cell, germ cell, apoptosis, tight junction
Citation: Adegoke EO, Rahman MS and Pang M-G (2020) Bisphenols Threaten Male Reproductive Health via Testicular Cells. Front. Endocrinol. 11:624. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00624
Received: 30 January 2020; Accepted: 30 July 2020;
Published: 11 September 2020.
Edited by:
Nicola Bernabò, University of Teramo, ItalyReviewed by:
Francesco Pallotti, Sapienza University of Rome, ItalyRajakumar Anbazhagan, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), United States
Copyright © 2020 Adegoke, Rahman and Pang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Myung-Geol Pang, bWdwYW5nJiN4MDAwNDA7Y2F1LmFjLmty