Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (TERT) Regulation in Thyroid Cancer: A Review

Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) is the catalytic subunit of the enzyme telomerase and is essential for telomerase activity. Upregulation of TERT expression and resulting telomerase activity occurs in the large majority of malignancies, including thyroid cancer. This upregulation results in continued cellular proliferation and avoidance of cellular senescence and cell death. In this review we will briefly introduce TERT and telomerase activity as it pertains to thyroid cancer and, highlight the effects of TERT on cancer cells. We will also explore in detail the different TERT regulatory strategies and how TERT is reactivated in thyroid cancer cells, specifically. These regulatory mechanisms include both activating single base pair TERT promoter mutations and epigenetic changes at the promoter, including changes in CpG methylation and histone modifications that affect chromatin structure. Further, regulation includes the allele-specific regulation of the TERT promoter in thyroid cancer cells harboring the TERT promoter mutation. These entail allele-specific transcriptional activator binding, DNA methylation, histone modifications, and mono-allelic expression of TERT. Lastly, TERT copy number alterations and alternative splicing are also implicated. Both amplifications of the TERT locus and increased full-length transcripts and decreased inactive and dominant negative isoforms result in active telomerase. Finally, the clinical significance of TERT in thyroid cancer is also reviewed.

Introduction

In contrast to stem cells, non-transformed somatic cells have a limited capacity to divide in tissue culture before cell division ceases. This is known as cellular senescence and the number of times a normal human somatic cell population will divide before cell division stops is referred to as the Hayflick limit (1). Cellular senescence results from the progressive shortening of chromosomal ends or telomeres, consisting of identical hexamer repeats, with each cell division. This phenomenon is due to the end replication problem, a shortcoming of semiconservative DNA replication, which cannot complete the synthesis of chromosomal ends (2). This critical shortening of telomeres continues until reactivation of the enzyme, telomerase, facilitates the resynthesizing of telomeres of sufficient length to allow continued cellular replication. Telomere lengthening can also occasionally occur through the alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) pathway, which extends telomeres without telomerase activity through recombination-dependent pathways. The ALT pathway remains poorly understood and will not be covered in this review of TERT regulation (3).

Telomerase is composed of two subunits: an RNA component, telomerase RNA (TR), serving as a template for telomere hexamer repeat addition onto DNA and, the catalytic component telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), responsible for reverse transcribing the hexamer repeats onto chromosomal ends (4). Not only is telomerase active in embryonic and stem cells, it is also upregulated in over 90% of malignancies, including thyroid cancer, enabling the unlimited replication of cancer cells (5–8).

TERT activation in cancer occurs through a variety of mechanisms. These include activating promoter mutations, alterations in promoter DNA methylation, chromatin remodeling, copy number alterations, and alternative splicing of TERT (9–13). Because telomerase plays a key role in carcinogenesis, understanding TERT regulation and telomerase activation in thyroid cancer is critical to understanding its pathogenesis. Indeed, two TERT regulatory mechanisms, TERT promoter mutations and TERT promoter methylation status, are implicated in the stratification of thyroid cancer patient prognosis (14–16).

In this review, we summarize our current understanding of the multiple mechanisms of TERT regulation in thyroid cancer. Activating point mutations in the TERT promoter markedly activate TERT transcription and are associated with epigenetic alterations observed in thyroid cancer cell lines and patient tumors. These epigenetic alterations include promoter methylation patterns and histone tail methylation modifications. The modifications have also been shown to affect the TERT promoter in an allele-specific manner, the details of which we will elucidate. Further, the TERT locus has also been found to have multiple chromosomal copies or, be amplified in cancer with associated increased TERT transcription. Lastly, post-transcription, the TERT transcript undergoes alternative splicing to form either the full-length transcript, which is the active isoform, or other inactive isoforms, which may also have regulatory functions. Finally, we highlight the clinical implications of TERT activation and, describe future potential avenues to explore in order to better understand regulation of this key enzyme as well as its role in carcinogenesis and cancer prognosis.

TERT Promoter Mutations

Activation of TERT transcription can be achieved by heterozygous point mutations at the TERT promoter. The two most common activating mutations are upstream of the TERT translation start site at −124 and −146, respectively, and both are cytosine to thymine mutations, −124C>T and −146 C>T (Figure 1B) (17–19). These TERT promoter mutations are not present in benign thyroid tumors or normal thyroid cells. Their prevalence, however, increases with more aggressive thyroid cancer subtypes and advanced stages of disease. Indeed, TERT mutations are present in only 11.3% of well-differentiated papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and 17.1% of follicular thyroid cancer (FTC), but present in 32% of widely invasive Hürthle cell carcinoma (HCC), compared to 5% of minimally invasive HCC, and in 43.2% of poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC) and 40.1% of anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) (20, 21). Furthermore, the TERT promoter mutations are found in almost all thyroid cancer cell lines, even those derived from well-differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) subtypes, in either the heterozygous or homozygous mutant state, indicative of their important role in cellular proliferation (11).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. (A) Examples of TERT copy number amplifications (chromosomal location 5p15.33): Focal copy number alterations, arm-level alterations, or chromosomal duplications (trisomy 5). (B) The landscape of the TERT promoter in thyroid cancer shows a lack of methylation (◯) surrounding the transcription start site, TSS, () and TERT promoter mutation (), with hypermethylation further upstream of the TSS (). Transcriptional activators MYC and ETS family factors bind at the TERT promoter, the latter binding in the presence of the TERT mutation only. (C) Alternative splicing of TERT in thyroid cancer. TERT is transcribed into mRNA, containing 16 exons (#5–9 shown). TERT can be alternatively spliced, into either the full length, α, β, or α/β isoforms. (D) Allele-specific regulation of the TERT promoter in thyroid cancer. The TERT mutant allele, with mutation () is in an open chromatin conformation, with histones spread across the DNA, depicted by the cluster of blue circles. The wildtype allele is in the closed chromatin conformation, with compacted histones on the DNA. The mutant TERT allele is associated with activating H3K4me3 histone marks, represented by the green squares, a CpG unmethylated (◯) promoter and methylated () gene body. The transcription factors GABPA and MYC bind at the promoter, and TERT is actively transcribed. The wildtype allele is associated with silencing H3K27me3 histone marks, represented by red squares, and a CpG methylated promoter.

As seen in the TCGA data, the presence a TERT mutation is also strongly associated with high risk of tumor recurrence, older age, higher MACIS (Metastasis, patient Age, Completeness of resection, local Invasion, and tumor Size) scores, and less-differentiated PTC (22). In support of the TCGA data, in a large study of thyroid cancers in which anaplastic carcinoma coexisted with papillary carcinoma, a multivariate comparison between the antecedent papillary carcinoma components and control papillary carcinomas without anaplastic transformation showed that TERT mutations were independently associated with anaplastic transformation (23). Further studies have also highlighted the association of the TERT promoter mutation and non-radioiodine avidity of metastatic disease (24, 25).

Mechanism of TERT Mutation Activation

Likely key to their effect, both TERT promoter mutations result in a novel 11 base pair binding site for the E-twenty-six (ETS) transcription factor family. The −124C>T mutation, however, elicits a higher activation of TERT compared to the −146C>T mutation and, is more common (20, 26). The activating GA Binding Protein Transcription Factor Subunit Alpha (GABPA), a member of the ETS family, binds at the TERT promoter mutation site as a heterotetramer with its counterpart, GABPB, in multiple cancer types, including thyroid cancer (26–29). In PTC cell lines, GABPA knockdown significantly lowered TERT expression in both wildtype and TERT promoter mutant cells, and in a luciferase activity assay, GABPA knockdown led to significant down regulation of the mutant TERT promoter. However, in an analysis of papillary thyroid cancers and TCGA data, an inverse relationship was found between GABPA expression and TERT expression in TERT promoter mutant tumors, highlighting the need for further study of TERT mutation activation (30).

Recently, another ETS factor, ETS Variant 5 (ETV5), was also found to bind the mutant TERT promoter and, bound at higher levels than GABPA in ATC cell lines. Conversely, GABPA bound at higher levels than ETV5 in well-differentiated thyroid cancer-derived cell lines (31), implicating potentially different roles of these specific ETS factors in well-differentiated and poorly differentiated cancers.

Synergistic Effects of TERT and BRAFV600E Mutation

The BRAFV600E mutation is also common in thyroid cancer. The BRAFV600E mutation is a single nucleotide mutation at codon 600, resulting in a substitution of glutamic acid for valine in the BRAF protein, a serine/threonine protein kinase that plays a role in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway/ERK signaling pathway. The BRAFV600E mutation is more abundant in classic PTC (51%) than in the follicular variant of PTC (FVPTC, 24%) or FTC (1.4%) (32). The BRAFV600E mutation acts synergistically with TERT promoter mutations and the presence of both mutations is associated with greater cancer aggressiveness, lymph node and distant metastasis, advanced tumor stage, recurrence, and increased mortality in patients with PTC (33–35). The mutation may also be responsible for increased activation of the ETS factor family through activation of the MAPK pathway. There are two prevailing proposed mechanisms for the activation of TERT by the BRAFV600E mutation and, the MAPK pathway. In one study of PTC cell lines, the MAPK pathway activates the transcription factor c-FOS, which can in turn bind to the GABPB promoter to increase its expression. This then leads to increase in GABPA-GABPB complex formation, which binds to the mutant TERT promoter to activate TERT (27). Alternatively, another study in PTCs from the TCGA study cohort shows upregulation of ETS factors ETV1, ETV4, and ETV5 in tumors that concomitantly harbored both BRAFV600E and TERT mutations and, demonstrated MAPK pathway activation. In cell lines, these ETS factors were found to bind to the mutant TERT promoter and upregulate transcription (36).

TERT Epigenetic Alterations

Epigenetic changes are stably inherited during cell division and occur at DNA or chromatin levels, but do not alter the primary base sequence (37). At the DNA level, epigenetic alterations occur by methylation of the cytosine nucleotide in cytosine-guanine dinucleotides (CpGs). CpG methylation surrounding the transcriptional start site (TSS) at gene promoters is usually associated with suppression of gene expression. Conversely, the absence of DNA methylation surrounding the TSS of genes is associated with active transcription. Transcription factors that bind and regulate gene promoters can also be methylation sensitive, where methylation impedes binding (38). The TERT promoter is within a CpG island and has a rich GC content of ~70% (39). Previous studies in a variety of cancer cell lines as well as solid tumors and hematological malignancies show a unique methylation pattern of TERT. Its promoter region surrounding the TSS [−200 to +100 relative to TSS] is unmethylated, while the upstream promoter region [−650 to −200] is hypermethylated (Figure 1B) (13, 40). The unmethylated TSS allows for transcription to occur by availing its binding sites for activators, such as MYC, and when the TERT promoter mutation is present, ETS family factors (41). The role of the hypermethylated upstream promoter, and its association with TERT expression, however, is unknown.

TERT Methylation in DTC

Our recent study in DTC cell lines and normal thyroid tissue confirmed that this dual methylation pattern observed in other cancer types is also seen in thyroid cancer (28). Five DTC cell lines exhibited low levels of methylation surrounding the TERT TSS while the upstream region was largely methylated. Comparatively, normal thyroid tissue showed overall low levels of methylation throughout the TERT promoter compared to the thyroid cancer cell lines (28, 29). Ours is the only study to date that comprehensively characterized TERT promoter methylation, as previous studies have focused on the hypermethylated upstream region only. A 2018 study of follicular neoplasms found the upstream TERT promoter was methylated significantly higher in FTC (13%) than follicular adenoma (8%) (42). Lastly, a study of upstream TERT promoter methylation patterns in 312 PTC, FTC, MTC, and ATC patients found significantly higher upstream DNA methylation in patients with cancer recurrence than in patients whose tumors did not recur. In patients with a recurrence, upstream TERT promoter methylation was also associated with higher tumor stage and the presence of lymph node metastasis (15).

TERT Upstream Methylation in MTC

A 2016 study of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) and normal thyroid tissue samples quantified the TERT upstream promoter methylation at eight CpG sites. Sporadic MTCs had a significantly higher methylation level (12–90.3%) compared to normal thyroid tissues (~10%). And, this methylation pattern positively correlated with expression of TERT and telomerase activation. Further, high methylation of the upstream TERT promoter correlated with shortened survival in patients with MTC (16).

TERT Histone Mark Modifications

In addition to methylation aberrations, epigenetic changes in the histone code can also modify gene expression by altering the chromatin state from a closed, inactive state to an open, actively transcribed state. The histone mark H3K27me3 maintains heterochromatin and recruitment of the polycomb repressor complex (PRC) for silenced genes (43). Alternatively, the H3K4me3 mark maintains actively transcribed genes in the open confirmation to enable access for transcriptional activators to bind (44). Telomerase negative primary cells exhibit high levels of the silencing H3K27me3 mark at the TERT promoter, compared to telomerase positive cancer cell lines (45), which exhibit the activating H3K4me3 mark (46).

This histone mark pattern was also seen in our recent study. The activating mark H3K4me3 was least abundant in the benign thyroid-derived cell line N-thy-ori-3, as well as a cell line wild type for the TERT mutation. There were intermediate levels of the mark in the cell lines heterozygous for the TERT promoter mutation, and most abundant in the homozygous TERT mutant cell line. The silent mark H3K27me3 displayed the opposite pattern, showing the highest level in the normal and wildtype thyroid cell lines, intermediate in the heterozygous mutant cell lines, and least abundant in the homozygous mutant cell line. The latter phenomenon depicts a pattern of activation at the TERT promoter in cancer cells that is dependent on the TERT promoter mutation status, where activation by chromatin marks also correlated with TERT expression (29).

Allele-Specific Regulation

Recently, in order to further delineate TERT transcriptional regulation, studies have been conducted in many cancer subtypes to examine allele-specific regulation and the TERT mutation (Figure 1D). Allele-specific regulation, resulting in expression of only one allele, is classically described by the well-known phenomenon, inactivation of one of the X chromosomes in all females. This is due to epigenetic effects, in which one of the two X chromosomes is stably transcriptionally silenced by methylation early in development (47).

A study in 2015 of multiple cancer cell lines showed monoallelic expression of TERT in cell lines heterozygous for the TERT promoter mutation, although the study did not elucidate which allele was transcribed (48). Further studies expanded upon this by showing allele-specific regulation of the alleles, in which the TERT promoter mutant allele exhibits the H3K4me2/3 activating histone modification as well as binding of RNA polymerase II, the polymerase responsible for actively transcribing genes. The activating ETS factor GABPA has also been shown in multiple cell lines to bind in an allele-specific manner to the mutant TERT promoter only. This would be expected since the mutation specifically creates the ETS factor binding site. The wild type TERT allele, however, displays the silencing histone mark H3K27me3 and, is associated with the PRC (45, 49).

TERT Allele-Specific Regulation in Thyroid Cancer

Allele-specific regulation in thyroid cancer cell lines has been explored by our group and others. In our recent study of five DTC cell lines we found the mutant allele at the TERT promoter was significantly less methylated than the wildtype allele, while the corresponding gene body associated with the mutant allele was more methylated. Further, a significant drop in methylation at the TSS of the mutant allele, but not the wildtype allele, was observed in the three heterozygous mutant cell lines. The methylation pattern observed on the mutant allele, of decreased methylation at the TSS and increased gene body methylation, is seen in actively transcribed genes. Additionally, we found that the activating transcription factors MYC and GABPA, bound to the mutant TERT allele exclusively. As expected, the activating histone mark H3K4me3 was associated with the mutant allele while the silenced mark H3K27me3 was associated with the wildtype allele. Bullock et al.'s recent study of two heterozygous mutant thyroid cancer cell lines suggested allele-specific regulation of TERT, showing monoallelic expression of TERT in the ATC and PTC cell lines. In the cell lines H3K4me3 was associated with the mutant allele only, while a majority of H3K27me3 was associated with the wildtype allele. In one ATC line, the ETS factor ETV5 bound in an allele-specific manner (31). Furthermore, by exploiting the presence of heterozygous SNPs in the transcripts, our group has definitively demonstrated that this allele-specific regulation results in selective transcription from only the mutant TERT promoter (29).

TERT Alternative Splicing

Previous studies have shown TERT expression is undetectable in normal thyroid tissue, low to absent in benign tumors, and elevated in thyroid cancers (20). TERT promoter mutations also are significantly associated with increased levels of TERT expression (20, 50). In addition, gene expression regulation can occur through alternative splicing (51). Indeed, TERT is regulated by alternative splicing, and thought to be crucial because even small amounts of TERT may have significant cellular consequences (Figure 1C) (9). This is exemplified by the fact that telomerase-positive malignant cells are estimated to contain only an average of 20 TERT transcripts per cell (52). The most common TERT isoforms include the following: (1) full-length transcript, the only isoform resulting in active telomerase (53, 54); (2) the α deletion isoform, an in-frame deletion of 36 base pairs in exon six resulting in a dominant negative inhibitor of telomerase (55); (3) the β deletion isoform, a 182 base pair deletion of exons seven and eight resulting in a reading frame shift forming a truncated TERT transcript that is sent for nonsense mediated decay (56); and (4) the α/β dual deletion isoform. Studies of TERT alternative splicing in multiple cancer types have shown the highest expressed isoform in cancer is the full-length isoform, which correlates with higher telomerase activity (57–59).

TERT Splicing in MTC

A study of 42 MTC tumors found TERT expression and telomerase activity in 50% (21/42) of the tumors. And, over two-thirds of the telomerase positive cancers (15/21) showed expression of the full-length TERT transcript, higher telomerase activity and were associated with a significantly shorter patient survival time (60).

TERT Splicing in DTC

Our group showed, in a study of 60 malignant tumors (PTC, FVPTC, FTC, and HCC) and 73 benign lesions, that malignant tumors showed a higher amount of the full-length isoform than the inactive TERT isoforms, while conversely, the benign tumors showed higher levels of the deletion isoforms (61). Further, only the full-length transcript correlated with telomerase activity (61, 62). By computing the proportion of full-length isoform to the deletion isoforms, we found the percentage score sorted thyroid tumors into subtypes; with the high full-length fractions of TERT found in PTC, HCC, and FTC, while intermediate fractions were found in FVPTC, Hürthle cell adenomas, and follicular adenomas and finally, low fractions in adenomatoid nodules (62).

TERT Copy Number Amplifications

DNA copy number variations, the gain or loss of chromosomal regions, including whole chromosomal arms (Figure 1A) within the genome, are quite common in cancer. They can provide a tumor cell proliferative advantages by eliminating tumor suppressors, in the case of deletions, or increasing expression of oncogenes, in the case of amplifications. TERT is located on the short arm of chromosome five (5p). 5p is one of the most frequent arm level regions to exhibit amplification with the phenomenon found in 13.2% of solid tumors (63). Further, a variety of high resolution techniques used to examine the TERT locus specifically, including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), Southern blot, and quantitative PCR, have shown copy number amplifications of TERT in both cancer cell lines and tumors (63). Studies have also documented a correlation in cell lines of increased TERT copy number with both increased TERT gene expression and telomerase activity (64).

A recent study by Panebianco et al., of 184 tumors of various thyroid cancer subtypes- PTC, FTC, HCC, MTC, and PDTC/ATC, identified an increased TERT copy number in 4.9% of tumors (65). Specifically, 1/107 (0.9%) PTCs displayed four copies of TERT; while 2/22 (9%) FTCs, 4/29 (13.8%) HCCs, 0/22 (0%) MTCs, and 2/4 (50%) PDTCs/ATCs harbored three copies of TERT. In addition, one HCC and one PDTC/ATC with 3 copies of TERT also harbored the TERT −124 C>T mutation (65). A 2018 study, limited to follicular tumors, found three or more copies of TERT in 6/77 (7.8%) of FTCs, 2/43 (4.7%) of follicular adenomas, and 4/19 (21%) of follicular tumors of uncertain malignant potential (42). In a 2016 study of MTC, 5/42 (11.9%) had three copies of TERT, and no normal thyroid tissue showed copy number variations. In all five tumors with copy number amplifications, TERT expression and telomerase activity was also positive (16). Lastly, the comprehensive TCGA study of ~500 PTCs from multiple institutions showed 5p arm copy number gains in 21/507 (4%). In this study, 5p gain correlated with advanced age, worse pathological stage, extrathyroidal extension, and increased tumor size (22).

Discussion

In summary, TERT is regulated by a variety of mechanisms, indicative of the complex regulatory effort cells exert to control telomerase activity. The majority of malignancies reactivate TERT expression, which in turn activates telomerase, to allow for continued proliferation. TERT reactivation is important for cancer cells, as cancer cells have significantly shorter telomeres. Shortened telomeres are found in PTC, FTC, HCC, and MTC compared to normal thyroid tissue and benign thyroid nodules (60, 62, 66–68). In PTC tumors, short telomeres were significantly correlated with TERT promoter mutations and older age (69).

In this review, we have summarized the current knowledge of TERT regulation, including TERT promoter mutations, CpG promoter methylation, histone tail modifications, copy number amplifications, and alternative splicing. Furthermore, we have described the allele-specific effects of the TERT mutation on transcriptional activator binding, promoter methylation, histone marks, and TERT expression. While all of these regulatory strategies are altered in thyroid cancer, and may play a significant role in TERT activation, these altered regulatory mechanisms have not yet been leveraged clinically.

TERT mRNA expression has been proposed as a prognostic marker, independent of the TERT promoter mutation. A study in PTC found a subset of wildtype TERT tumors with high TERT expression, which correlated with a higher recurrence rate (70). However, other studies have shown that TERT immunohistochemistry (IHC), or measurement of protein expression is not a useful clinical tool for prognostication. A study in FTC showed no correlation between TERT mRNA expression and TERT immunoreactivity (71), and a study in PTC showed no correlation with TERT IHC and clinicopathological traits (72).

Presence of the TERT promoter mutation, however, may be promising for future use to guide clinical decision making and treatment. The presence of the TERT promoter mutation is indicative of worse clinicopathological factors in thyroid cancer. The thyroid research field has recently begun to embrace the use of molecular markers to help in making clinical decisions. For example, post-operative screening for the TERT promoter mutation in follicular tumors of uncertain malignant potential (FT-UMP) was found to inform follow-up and treatment, as the TERT mutation was a predictive marker of distant metastases (73). Further, current molecular testing does include the TERT promoter mutations in some platforms, including ThyroSeq and ThyGenX. Current guidelines, however, do not support using the TERT mutation status for initial risk stratification (74). In the new American Association of Endocrine Surgeons Guidelines for the Definitive Surgical Management of Thyroid Disease in Adults, there is acknowledgment of inclusion of the TERT promoter mutation in assessment of the overall mutational burden in thyroid cancers (74). But for many molecular markers, the utility has not been tested given the newly published guidelines, nor has there been an incorporation of the new reclassification of the Non-Invasive Follicular Thyroid neoplasm with Papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP). The 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer listed TERT, alone or in combination with BRAF, as potentially helpful to risk stratify patients in conjunction with other clinicopathological risk factors. However, this was considered a weak recommendation with low-quality evidence only (75).

In conclusion, we know much about telomerase regulation. Capitalizing upon our deep understanding of these regulatory mechanisms may lead to crucial and needed therapeutic options in the future. Nevertheless, major gaps in our understanding of telomerase regulation remain.

Understanding how TERT splicing is regulated is essential to a better understanding of the activation of telomerase. Characterization of TERT promoter methylation as well as ETS transcriptional activator binding in specific thyroid cancer subtypes, especially in PDTC and ATC, may lead to potential treatment options for these fatal diseases. Additionally, the study of chromosomal architecture surrounding TERT, and the effect of the TERT mutation on 3D chromatin structure in thyroid cancer have yet to be explored. One aspect that remains to be fully understood is how the higher levels of TERT expression and activity found in TERT-mutant cells provides a proliferative or other competitive advantage, since cancer cells typically have activated TERT expression to overcome the Hayflick limit long before TERT promoter mutations arise. Further understanding of how cancer cells that do not harbor the TERT mutation activate TERT through various regulatory methods still needs to be elucidated. Further studies are needed to determine the true utility of the TERT mutation status in a clinical setting and, how best to target TERT regulation.

Author Contributions

BM, CU, and MZ designed, wrote, and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by NSF grant DGE-1746891 (BM) and NIH training grant #T32 GM007445 (BM).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The reviewer KB declared a shared affiliation, with no collaboration, with the authors, BM and CU to the handling editor at the time of the review.

Abbreviations

ALT, alternative lengthening of telomeres; ATC, anaplastic thyroid cancer; ATRX, ATRX chromatin remodeler; CpG, cytosine-guanine dinucleotides; DAXX, death domain associated protein; DTC, differentiated thyroid cancer; ETV5, ETS variant 5; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; FTC, follicular thyroid cancer; GABPA, GA binding protein transcription factor subunit alpha; HCC, Hürthle cell carcinoma; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MTC, medullary thyroid cancer; PDTC, poorly differentiated thyroid cancer; PRC, polycomb repressor complex; PTC, papillary thyroid cancer; TERT, telomerase reverse transcriptase; TR, telomerase RNA; TSS, transcription start site.

References

1. Hayflick L. The limited in vitro lifetime of human diploid cell strains. Exp Cell Res. (1965) 37:614–36. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90211-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. de Lange T. How telomeres solve the end-protection problem. Science. (2009) 326:948–52. doi: 10.1126/science.1170633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Donati B, Ciarrocchi A. Telomerase and telomeres biology in thyroid cancer. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:2887. doi: 10.3390/ijms20122887

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Greider CW, Blackburn EH. The telomere terminal transferase of tetrahymena is a ribonucleoprotein enzyme with two kinds of primer specificity. Cell. (1987) 51:887–98. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90576-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Koziel JE, Fox MJ, Steding CE, Sprouse AA, Herbert B-S. Medical genetics and epigenetics of telomerase. J Cell Mol Med. (2011) 15:457–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01276.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Haugen BR, Nawaz S, Markham N, Hashizumi T, Shroyer AL, Werness B, et al. Telomerase activity in benign and malignant thyroid tumors. Thyroid. (1997) 7:337–42. doi: 10.1089/thy.1997.7.337

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Yuan X, Larsson C, Xu D. Mechanisms underlying the activation of TERT transcription and telomerase activity in human cancer: old actors and new players. Oncogene. (2019) 38:6172–83. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0872-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Yoo S-K, Song YS, Lee EK, Hwang J, Kim HH, Jung G, et al. Integrative analysis of genomic and transcriptomic characteristics associated with progression of aggressive thyroid cancer. Nat Commun. (2019) 10:2764. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10680-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Wong MS, Chen L, Foster C, Kainthla R, Shay JW, Wright WE. Regulation of telomerase alternative splicing: a target for chemotherapy. Cell Rep. (2013) 3:1028–35. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.03.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Castelo-Branco P, Choufani S, Mack S, Gallagher D, Zhang C, Lipman T, et al. Methylation of the TERT promoter and risk stratification of childhood brain tumours: an integrative genomic and molecular study. Lancet Oncol. (2013) 14:534–42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70110-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Liu X, Bishop J, Shan Y, Pai S, Liu D, Murugan AK, et al. Highly prevalent TERT promoter mutations in aggressive thyroid cancers. Endocr Relat Cancer. (2013) 20:603–10. doi: 10.1530/ERC-13-0210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kyo S, Takakura M, Fujiwara T, Inoue M. Understanding and exploiting hTERT promoter regulation for diagnosis and treatment of human cancers. Cancer Sci. (2008) 99:1528–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00878.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Avin B, Umbricht C, Zeiger M. Human telomerase reverse transcriptase regulation by DNA methylation, transcription factor binding and alternative splicing. Int J Oncol. (2016) 49:2199–205. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3743

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Cipriani NA. Prognostic parameters in differentiated thyroid carcinomas. Surg Pathol Clin. (2019) 12:883–900. doi: 10.1016/j.path.2019.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Li J-J, Zheng PCJ-R, Wang Y-Z. The correlations between DNA methylation and polymorphisms in the promoter region of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene with postoperative recurrence in patients with thyroid carcinoma (TC). World J Surg Oncol. (2017) 15:114. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1170-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Wang N, Kjellin H, Sofiadis A, Fotouhi O, Juhlin CC, Bäckdahl M, et al. Genetic and epigenetic background and protein expression profiles in relation to telomerase activation in medullary thyroid carcinoma. Oncotarget. (2016) 7:21332–46. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Huang FW, Hodis E, Xu MJ, Kryukov GV, Chin L, Garraway LA. Highly recurrent TERT promoter mutations in human melanoma. Science. (2013) 339:957–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1229259

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Horn S, Figl A, Rachakonda PS, Fischer C, Sucker A, Gast A, et al. TERT promoter mutations in familial and sporadic melanoma. Science. (2013) 339:959–61. doi: 10.1126/science.1230062

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Chiba K, Johnson JZ, Vogan JM, Wagner T, Boyle JM, Hockemeyer D, et al. Cancer-associated TERT promoter mutations abrogate telomerase silencing. Elife. (2015) 4:e07918. doi: 10.7554/eLife.07918

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Liu R, Xing M. TERT promoter mutations in thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. (2016) 23:R143–55. doi: 10.1530/ERC-15-0533

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Ganly I, Makarov V, Deraje S, Dong Y, Reznik E, Seshan V, et al. Integrated genomic analysis of hürthle cell cancer reveals oncogenic drivers, recurrent mitochondrial mutations, and unique chromosomal landscapes. Cancer Cell. (2018) 34:256–70.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.07.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic characterization of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cell. (2014) 159:676–90. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Oishi N, Kondo T, Ebina A, Sato Y, Akaishi J, Hino R, et al. Molecular alterations of coexisting thyroid papillary carcinoma and anaplastic carcinoma: identification of TERT mutation as an independent risk factor for transformation. Mod Pathol. (2017) 30:1527–37. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.75

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Yang X, Li J, Li X, Liang Z, Gao W, Liang J, et al. TERT promoter mutation predicts radioiodine-refractory character in distant metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer. J Nucl Med. (2017) 58:258–65. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.180240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Meng Z, Matsuse M, Saenko V, Yamashita S, Ren P, Zheng X, et al. TERT promoter mutation in primary papillary thyroid carcinoma lesions predicts absent or lower ¹³¹I uptake in metastases. IUBMB Life. (2019) 71:iub.2056. doi: 10.1002/iub.2056

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Bell RJA, Rube HT, Kreig A, Mancini A, Fouse SD, Nagarajan RP, et al. Cancer. The transcription factor GABP selectively binds and activates the mutant TERT promoter in cancer. Science. (2015) 348:1036–9. doi: 10.1126/science.aab0015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Liu R, Zhang T, Zhu G, Xing M. Regulation of mutant TERT by BRAF V600E/MAP kinase pathway through FOS/GABP in human cancer. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:579. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03033-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Avin BA, Wang Y, Gilpatrick T, Workman RE, Lee I, Timp W, et al. Characterization of human telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter methylation and transcription factor binding in differentiated thyroid cancer cell lines. Genes Chromosom Cancer. (2019) 58:530–40. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22735

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. McKelvey BA, Gilpatrick T, Wang Y, Timp W, Umbricht CB, Zeiger MA. Characterization of allele-specific regulation of telomerase reverse transcriptase in promoter mutant thyroid cancer cell lines. Thyroid. (2020). doi: 10.1089/thy.2020.0055. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Yuan X, Mu N, Wang N, Strååt K, Sofiadis A, Guo Y, et al. GABPA inhibits invasion/metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma by regulating DICER1 expression. Oncogene. (2019) 38:965–79. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0483-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Bullock M, Lim G, Zhu Y, Åberg H, Kurdyukov S, Clifton-Bligh RJ. The ETS factor ETV5 activates the mutant TERT promoter in thyroid cancer. Thyroid. (2019) 29:1623–33. doi: 10.1089/thy.2018.0314

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

32. Kebebew E, Weng J, Bauer J, Ranvier G, Clark OH, Duh Q-Y, et al. The prevalence and prognostic value of BRAF mutation in thyroid cancer. Ann Surg. (2007) 246:466–70. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318148563d

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Song YS, Lim JA, Choi H, Won J-K, Moon JH, Cho SW, et al. Prognostic effects of TERT promoter mutations are enhanced by coexistence with BRAF or RAS mutations and strengthen the risk prediction by the ATA or TNM staging system in differentiated thyroid cancer patients. Cancer. (2016) 122:1370–9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29934

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Xing M, Liu R, Liu X, Murugan AK, Zhu G, Zeiger MA, et al. BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations cooperatively identify the most aggressive papillary thyroid cancer with highest recurrence. J Clin Oncol. (2014) 32:2718–26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.5094

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Liu R, Bishop J, Zhu G, Zhang T, Ladenson PW, Xing M. Mortality risk stratification by combining BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations in papillary thyroid cancer. JAMA Oncol. (2017) 3:202–8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3288

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Song YS, Yoo S-K, Kim HH, Jung G, Oh A-R, Cha J-Y, et al. Interaction of BRAF-induced ETS factors with mutant TERT promoter in papillary thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. (2019) 26:629–41. doi: 10.1530/ERC-17-0562

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Nebbioso A, Tambaro FP, Dell'Aversana C, Altucci L. Cancer epigenetics: moving forward. PLoS Genet. (2018) 14:e1007362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007362

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Jang HS, Shin WJ, Lee JE, Do JT. CpG and non-CpG methylation in epigenetic gene regulation and brain function. Genes (Basel). (2017) 8:148. doi: 10.3390/genes8060148

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Choi J-H, Park SH, Park J, Park BG, Cha S-J, Kong K-H, et al. Site-specific methylation of CpG nucleotides in the hTERT promoter region can control the expression of hTERT during malignant progression of colorectal carcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2007) 361:615–20. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.07.051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Zinn RL, Pruitt K, Eguchi S, Baylin SB, Herman JG. hTERT is expressed in cancer cell lines despite promoter DNA methylation by preservation of unmethylated DNA and active chromatin around the transcription start site. Cancer Res. (2007) 67:194–201. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3396

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Lopatina NG, Poole JC, Saldanha SN, Hansen NJ, Key JS, Pita MA, et al. Control mechanisms in the regulation of telomerase reverse transcriptase expression in differentiating human teratocarcinoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2003) 306:650–9. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01033-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Paulsson JO, Mu N, Shabo I, Wang N, Zedenius J, Larsson C, et al. TERT aberrancies: a screening tool for malignancy in follicular thyroid tumours. Endocr Relat Cancer. (2018) 25:723–33. doi: 10.1530/ERC-18-0050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. (2011) 21:381–95. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.22

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Salgado C, Roelse C, Nell R, Gruis N, van Doorn R, van der Velden P. Interplay between TERT promoter mutations and methylation culminates in chromatin accessibility and TERT expression. bioRxiv. (2019) 859892. doi: 10.1101/859892

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Stern JL, Theodorescu D, Vogelstein B, Papadopoulos N, Cech TR. Mutation of the TERT promoter, switch to active chromatin, and monoallelic TERT expression in multiple cancers. Genes Dev. (2015) 29:2219–24. doi: 10.1101/gad.269498.115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Zhao Y, Cheng D, Wang S, Zhu J. Dual roles of c-Myc in the regulation of hTERT gene. Nucleic Acids Res. (2014) 42:10385–98. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku721

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Panning B. X-chromosome inactivation: the molecular basis of silencing. J Biol. (2008) 7:30. doi: 10.1186/jbiol95

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Huang FW, Bielski CM, Rinne ML, Hahn WC, Sellers WR, Stegmeier F, et al. TERT promoter mutations and monoallelic activation of TERT in cancer. Oncogenesis. (2015) 4:e176. doi: 10.1038/oncsis.2015.39

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Stern JL, Paucek RD, Huang FW, Ghandi M, Nwumeh R, Costello JC, et al. Allele-specific DNA methylation and its interplay with repressive histone marks at promoter-mutant TERT genes. Cell Rep. (2017) 21:3700–7. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Vinagre J, Almeida A, Pópulo H, Batista R, Lyra J, Pinto V, et al. Frequency of TERT promoter mutations in human cancers. Nat Commun. (2013) 4:2185. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3185

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

51. Sebestyén E, Zawisza M, Eyras E. Detection of recurrent alternative splicing switches in tumor samples reveals novel signatures of cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. (2015) 43:1345–56. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1392

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Wong MS, Wright WE, Shay JW. Alternative splicing regulation of telomerase: a new paradigm? Trends Genet. (2014) 30:430–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.07.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Liu L, Liu C, Fotouhi O, Fan Y, Wang K, Xia C, et al. TERT promoter hypermethylation in gastrointestinal cancer: a potential stool biomarker. Oncologist. (2017) 22:1178–88. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Ulaner GA, Hu JF, Vu TH, Giudice LC, Hoffman AR. Telomerase activity in human development is regulated by human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) transcription and by alternate splicing of hTERT transcripts. Cancer Res. (1998) 58:4168–72.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

55. Colgin LM, Wilkinson C, Englezou A, Kilian A, Robinson MO, Reddel RR. The hTERTalpha splice variant is a dominant negative inhibitor of telomerase activity. Neoplasia. (2000) 2:426–32. doi: 10.1038/sj.neo.7900112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Bounacer A, Wicker R, Caillou B, Cailleux AF, Sarasin A, Schlumberger M, et al. High prevalence of activating ret proto-oncogene rearrangements, in thyroid tumors from patients who had received external radiation. Oncogene. (1997) 15:1263–73. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1200206

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Lincz LF, Mudge L-M, Scorgie FE, Sakoff JA, Hamilton CS, Seldon M. Quantification of hTERT splice variants in melanoma by SYBR green real-time polymerase chain reaction indicates a negative regulatory role for the β deletion variant. Neoplasia. (2008) 10:1131–7. doi: 10.1593/neo.08644

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Mavrogiannou E, Strati A, Stathopoulou A, Tsaroucha EG, Kaklamanis L, Lianidou ES. Real-time RT-PCR quantification of human telomerase reverse transcriptase splice variants in tumor cell lines and non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Chem. (2007) 53:53–61. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2006.073015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Rha SY, Jeung HC, Park KH, Kim JJ, Chung HC. Changes of telomerase activity by alternative splicing of full-length and β variants of hTERT in breast cancer patients. Oncol Res Featur Preclin Clin Cancer Ther. (2009) 18:213–20. doi: 10.3727/096504009X12596189659123

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Wang N, Xu D, Sofiadis A, Höög A, Vukojević V, Bäckdahl M, et al. Telomerase-dependent and independent telomere maintenance and its clinical implications in medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2014) 99:E1571–9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-1158

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Wang Y, Kowalski J, Tsai H-L, Marik R, Prasad N, Somervell H, et al. Differentiating alternative splice variant patterns of human telomerase reverse transcriptase in thyroid neoplasms. Thyroid. (2008) 18:1055–63. doi: 10.1089/thy.2008.0101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Wang Y, Meeker AK, Kowalski J, Tsai H-L, Somervell H, Heaphy C, et al. Telomere length is related to alternative splice patterns of telomerase in thyroid tumors. Am J Pathol. (2011) 179:1415–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.05.056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Cao Y, Bryan TM, Reddel RR. Increased copy number of the TERT and TERC telomerase subunit genes in cancer cells. Cancer Sci. (2008) 99:1092–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00815.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Zhang A, Zheng C, Lindvall C, Hou M, Ekedahl J, Lewensohn R, et al. Frequent amplification of the telomerase reverse transcriptase gene in human tumors. Cancer Res. (2000) 60:6230–5.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

65. Panebianco F, Nikitski AV, Nikiforova MN, Nikiforov YE. Spectrum of TERT promoter mutations and mechanisms of activation in thyroid cancer. Cancer Med. (2019) 8:5831–9. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2467

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Capezzone M, Cantara S, Marchisotta S, Busonero G, Formichi C, Benigni M, et al. Telomere length in neoplastic and nonneoplastic tissues of patients with familial and sporadic papillary thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2011) 96:E1852–6. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-1003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Kammori M, Takubo K, Nakamura K, Furugouri E, Endo H, Kanauchi H, et al. Telomerase activity and telomere length in benign and malignant human thyroid tissues. Cancer Lett. (2000) 159:175–81. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(00)00547-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Sugishita Y, Kammori M, Yamada O, Yamazaki K, Ito K, Fukumori T, et al. Biological differential diagnosis of follicular thyroid tumor and Hürthle cell tumor on the basis of telomere length and hTERT expression. Ann Surg Oncol. (2014) 21:2318–25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3552-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Liu T, Wang N, Cao J, Sofiadis A, Dinets A, Zedenius J, et al. The age- and shorter telomere-dependent TERT promoter mutation in follicular thyroid cell-derived carcinomas. Oncogene. (2014) 33:4978–84. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.446

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Tanaka A, Matsuse M, Saenko VA, Nakao T, Yamanouchi K, Sakimura C, et al. TERT mRNA expression as a novel prognostic marker in papillary thyroid carcinomas. Thyroid. (2019) 29:1105–14. doi: 10.1089/thy.2018.0695

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Paulsson JO, Olander A, Haglund F, Zedenius J, Juhlin CC. TERT immunohistochemistry is a poor predictor of TERT promoter mutations and gene expression in follicular thyroid carcinoma. Endocr Pathol. (2018) 29:380–3. doi: 10.1007/s12022-018-9551-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Cacciato Insilla A, Proietti A, Borrelli N, Macerola E, Niccoli C, Vitti P, et al. TERT promoter mutations and their correlation with BRAF and RAS mutations in a consecutive cohort of 145 thyroid cancer cases. Oncol Lett. (2017) 15:2763–70. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7675

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Hysek M, Paulsson JO, Jatta K, Shabo I, Stenman A, Höög A, et al. Clinical routine TERT promoter mutational screening of follicular thyroid tumors of uncertain malignant potential (FT-UMPs): a useful predictor of metastatic disease. Cancers (Basel). (2019) 11:1443. doi: 10.3390/cancers11101443

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Patel KN, Yip L, Lubitz CC, Grubbs EG, Miller BS, Shen W, et al. The American association of endocrine surgeons guidelines for the definitive surgical management of thyroid disease in adults. Ann Surg. (2020) 271:e21–93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003580

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Smallridge RC, Ain KB, Asa SL, Bible KC, Brierley JD, Burman KD, et al. American thyroid association guidelines for management of patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer. Thyroid. (2012) 22:1104–39. doi: 10.1089/thy.2012.0302

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar