Giuseppe Schepisi1*
Silvia De Padova2Delia De Lisi3Chiara Casadei1Elena Meggiolaro2Federica Ruffilli2Giovanni Rosti1Cristian Lolli1Giorgia Ravaglia4
Vincenza Conteduca1Alberto Farolfi1
Luigi Grassi5
Ugo De Giorgi1- 1Medical Oncology Department, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
- 2Psycho-Oncology Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
- 3Medical Oncology Department, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
- 4Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
- 5Hospital Psychiatry Unit, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, Integrated Department of Mental Health and Addictive Behavior, Institute of Psychiatry, St. Anna University Hospital and NHS Community Health Trusts, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
Testicular cancer is the most frequent tumor in young males aged 15–39 years. As cure rates are currently around 90%, the prevalence of survivors is increasing. However, a disease-free condition does not necessarily correspond to a life free of physical and psychosocial health problems. The aim of this review was to explore psychosocial morbidity among testicular cancer survivors. A literature search was conducted in three electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, and Embase). The results of the search on cancer survivors were then combined with those of the search on psychosocial concerns and work performance. Eighty-four publications met the inclusion criteria. Physical, psychological, work-related problems and changing perspectives about work and life in general influenced life and career decisions among testicular cancer survivors. Individual health, sexual relationships and work problems, affect several important aspects of survival and significantly influence the QoL of long-term survivors.
Introduction
Testicular cancer (TC), which represents 1% of male tumors, is the most frequent tumor in young males aged 15–39 years, and its incidence is increasing worldwide (1).
The most frequent histology is germ cell tumor (which represents 90–95% of cases): there are several subgroups of germ cell tumors: Seminoma (Pure, Spermatocytic), Embryonal Carcinoma, Choriocarcinoma, Yolk Sac Tumor, Teratoma (mature, immature, with malignant component). Some epidemiological risk factors has been detected: cryptorchidism, hypospadias, decreased spermatogenesis, familial history, or personal history of contralateral TC. Overall, this is often a treatable tumor, but prognosis and consequently mortality depend on the risk categories defined by the 1997 International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (Table 1) (2). TC can be cured by surgery, in case of localized disease, or by chemotherapy, in case of metastatic disease. Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens are the standard treatment because they allow to obtain complete responses, even in metastatic patients (3). As cure rates for TC are currently around 90%, the prevalence of TC survivors (TCSs) is increasing and their life expectancy is considered comparable to that of the age-matched male general population (4, 5). However, a disease-free condition does not necessarily correspond to a life free of physical and psychosocial health problems.
Table 1. Prognostic groups based on the IGCCCG Consensus Classification (2).
Although the majority of TCSs experience good levels of functioning and enjoy a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) comparable to that of the general population, a minority of survivors are faced with the long-term psychosocial effects and somatic sequelae of their disease history and previous treatments (platinum-based chemotherapy, radiotherapy and/or retroperitoneal lymphoadenectomy) (6–8).
It has been estimated that the overall incidence rate of late effects among TCSs is 66.3 per 1,000 persons/year, and that a higher risk is observed for hypercholesterolemia, infertility, and orchitis (9). Fertility issues, fatigue, chronic peripheral neuropathy, hearing loss, Raynaud-like phenomenon, tinnitus, cardiovascular toxicity, decreased pulmonary function, hypertension, and hyperthyroidism have also been reported (6, 10–19).
Furthermore, TCSs have a slightly higher risk than normal of developing germ cell tumors and/or treatment-induced non-germ cell tumors (15). There is also evidence that TC diagnosis and treatment can cause psychosocial problems in survivors (20) such as anxiety, fertility distress, fear of recurrence (21–23), all of which reduce overall life satisfaction and negatively affect social contacts and family relationships (20).
The aim of this review was to explore psychosocial morbidity among TCSs, focusing on 3 levels of concern: physical, psychological, and reentry, as conceptualized by Holland et al. (24).
Methods
A literature search was conducted in three electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, and Embase) and original studies published up to October 2017 were identified. The term “survivor(s)” was combined with “testis cancer,” “testicular cancer,” and “germ-cell tumors” to facilitate the retrieval of abstracts about TCSs. The terms “physical,” “psychological,” and “quality of life” were used to search for material on physical and psychosocial issues. For work, the terms “work,” “job,” “worker(s),” “absenteeism,” and “reentry problems” were used.
In this narrative review, the results of the search on cancer survivors were then combined with those of the search on psychosocial concerns and work performance.
Results
Physical Issues
Physical concerns include continued preoccupation with illness and hypervigilance regarding minor symptoms, aches and pains, fears of disease recurrence or relapse, increased feelings of physical damage and infertility, and concerns about sexuality and attractiveness (24). Main physical concerns are summarized in Table 2. Over 70% of TCSs assessed their general health as good (8) and perceived their overall quality of life as equal to or slightly better than that of healthy men (6, 8, 29, 30). However, it has been seen that the quality of life of TCSs can be compromised by some disease-related health issues and physical limitations (30). According to some studies the greatest changes are physical (31, 32) and, among these, the main long-term sequelae are impairment of sexual life and fertility (29).
Table 2. Physical issues in long-term TCSs.
The uneasiness related to physical issues can take different forms. The experience of TC may compromise the person's sense of “invulnerability” and safety and replace it with fear of recurrence, concerns about other tumors, and death (33). Anxiety about follow-up diagnostic tests and cancer recurrence are known to be very common in cancer survivors and to persist a long time after the end of treatments (34, 35), despite the good prognosis for TC and the rarity of late recurrence (1–4% of cases) (36, 37). Fosså et al. (38) found that 17% of TCSs reported a worsening of anxiety related to relapse 2 years after the baseline measurement, whereas 36% of patients displayed improved global quality of life as compared with baseline Skaali et al. reported that almost one out of 3 TCSs reported fear of recurrence an average of 11 years after diagnosis (22). Moreover, higher levels of fear of recurrence (FoR) were significantly associated with higher levels of psychological distress, but not with cancer histotypes or treatment modalities. However, treatment-induced neurotoxicity, fatigue and severe somatic symptoms were significantly associated with level of FoR. The level of FoR was negatively correlated with quality of life (QoL) scores (22).
TC and related treatment strategies can cause both physiological changes and emotional reactions that affect or interfere with sexual functioning.
Impairment of sexual life and fertility represent the main long-term physical sequelae with respect to healthy controls (29), with sexual problems after TC therapy present in around 20% of patients (25, 39).
TC usually occurs during a man's most sexually active years when the impact of disease and treatments on sexual functioning, fertility, identity, and body image can be devastating (26). There is evidence that perceived attractiveness, retaining fertility, having children, and living with a partner are among the most important predictors of good health-related quality of life for men 3–13 years post-treatment (8). Dahl et al. reported that, although TCSs experience more problems with sexual drive, erection and ejaculation than healthy men, sexual satisfaction is not decreased and is even better than control for younger survivors (20–39 years). Moreover, whilst increasing age, lack of a partner, and high levels of anxiety are associated with compromised overall sexual function, this is also known to be true of males in general (26).
A varying percentage of TCSs report having physical sexual problems: orgasmic problems (10–20%); ejaculatory failure (29–44%), which is related to surgery in the retroperitoneal area; and erectile dysfunction (around 10%), which is linked to radiotherapy. In addition to physical sexual issues, some survivors also report psychosexual dysfunction after treatment such as decreased libido (7–20%), decreased sexual activity (9–24%) and dissatisfaction (5–20%) (40, 41). Some studies have reported different data on erectile dysfunction, the prevalence of which after TC is similar to that found in the general population (20, 26).
A review and meta-analysis of 36 studies sexual functioning after treatment for TC, covering a mean follow-up period of 2.0–6.9 years, revealed no deterioration over the course of time apart from a decrease in sexual desire and an increase in sexual satisfaction (40). Nazareth et al. (41) stated that, in general, sexual dysfunction linked to treatment of TC persists for about 2 years post-treatment, after which functioning seems to recover. In a recent Danish study, conducted in a cohort of 2,260 TCSs with a median follow-up of 17 years, a relationship among chemo—(bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin) radiotherapy and increased risk of erectile dysfunction was found (42).
Sexual dysfunction may be due to biological or psychological causes or a combination of both. According to Jonker-Pool et al. (40), a distinction can be made: impairment in physiologic domains such as erection and ejaculation are associated with extent of disease and treatment modalities (i.e., surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy), while psychological domains such as sex drive and satisfaction are treatment-independent. However, treatment strategies for TC can result in physiologic changes and at the same time trigger emotional reactions. Thus, decreased sexual functioning (e.g., reduction in or inhibition of libido) may be due to treatment-related somatic factors such as fatigue, general malaise, hair loss, and excessive weight changes attributable to emotional factors including about sexual performance, fear of loss of control, and uncertainty about the future (12, 43).
Psychological factors arising from having a life-threatening, genitourinary disease play a strongly mediating (if not determining) role in sexual functioning; the traumatic experience of having cancer may affect the sexuality of TCSs, influencing more subjective aspects such as sexual desire, sexual activity, and sexual satisfaction (20, 40, 44).
Because of the symbolic nature of the testes, the loss of this organ may affect masculinity, sexual identity, and body image. Castration or (hemi)castration is linked to fantasies, beliefs, myths, and cultural values about the testes that can have a severely traumatic effect and psychological consequences on the person/patient. Thus, concerns related to sexual and reproductive functioning may generate feelings of inadequacy, hopelessness, and emotional distress (45).
After removal of a testicle by orchiectomy, TCSs may have long-lasting feelings of loss or shame. Skoogh et al. (46) found that such feelings were more common among younger and single men than among older and non-single men. There was no correlation between feelings of loss or uneasiness and shame and having or not having a prosthesis, although offering a testicular prosthesis may help to reduce the trauma induced by this experience.
TC involves a male organ that is highly associated with perceptions of masculinity, attractiveness and body image. Patients undergoing removal of a testicle may see it as a disembodying procedure, especially during the period in their life when there is a heightened fixation on the “perfect body” and a striving for physical fitness (45).
Body image is a seldom explored topic in TC survivorship. In a work by Rossen et al., negative changes in body image, i.e., perceived reduced masculinity, following TC and its treatment, were reported in 17% of long-term TCSs and were associated with various aspects of sexual dysfunction, i.e., reduced sexual interest, reduced sexual activity, reduced sexual enjoyment, erectile dysfunction, ejaculation dysfunction, and increased sexual discomfort (28). Similar results have been reported in other studies. Tuinman et al. (47) found that 16% of survivors expressed concern about their body image and reported feeling anxious at the thought that other people notice the missing testicle. Rudberg et al. (48) reported that 15% of Swedish TCS felt less attractive. Thus, although the surgical removal of a testicle generally has a negative impact on body image, this tends to less over time (21) and most TCSs do not report feeling less attractive (8) or less masculine than before their experience of TC (38).
Another aspect that affects the emotional experience of TC patients is the meaning they give to the disease. TC attacks an organ intrinsically associated with sexuality and reproduction at a time of life when sexual desire and performance, sense of masculinity, body image, and fertility are central issues (49). A Norwegian study conducted on a cancer survivor population (including TCSs) reported a significant reduction in paternity in the TCSs compared to non-cancer males (27).
Recently, a Greek study of 53 TC patients submitted to full bilateral, non-nerve-sparing post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) observed that orgasmic function, intercourse and overall sexual satisfaction were significantly impaired post-operatively (50). However, as a subjective perception, a substantial number of patients reported higher levels of sexual desire and no difference in erectile function poorer orgasmic function and satisfaction post-operatively (50).
In a Serbian cross-sectional study involving 202 TCSs, 27.3% experienced decreased sexual function compared to the period before chemotherapy, 20.8% reported no erectile function impairment and 25.7% had problems with ejaculation. Loss of desire was reported by 17.3% of TCSs (51).
An Italian study evaluating the effects of several kinds of treatment on erectile function found that only adjuvant radiotherapy was as an independent predictor of non-recovery of normal function. Adjuvant chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy plus RPLND or RPLND alone did not significantly impair the recovery of normal erections (52).
Psychological Concerns
Although there is evidence to suggest that the majority of cancer survivors adjust well in terms of QoL and psychological well-being, emotional problems have been reported in a substantial minority of long-term TCSs (53). Main psychological concerns are summarized in Table 3. The experience of cancer and long-term physical sequelae of treatment can affect the psychological well-being and may lead to increased levels of psychological distress in those living with a history of cancer (57, 58). Psychosocial morbidity among cancer survivors include an increased sense of vulnerability and uncertainty about the future, feelings of personal inadequacy, fear of social rejection and stigmatization, anxiety, depression, and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (24). Increased levels of anxiety and depression may also be present years after diagnosis (59, 60). A recent study by Inhestern et al. (61) confirmed the conclusions of a meta-analysis in long-term cancer survivors conducted by Mitchell et al. in which anxiety, rather than depression, was a more widely perceived problem in long-term cancer survivors than in healthy controls (62).
Table 3. Psychological issues in long-term TCSs.
Several studies on the lives of TC survivors have found that the psychosocial aspects of the disease, such as anxiety about the future, coping and work reentry, are more important determinants of distress, morbidity and QoL than the type of treatment undergone and the time since its completion. It is thus possible that subjective evaluations are more important determinants of functioning and contributors to distress than a patient's actual medical history (7, 55, 63, 64).
There is evidence that cancer may precipitate post-traumatic stress (PTS) conditions, including PTS symptoms or PTS disorders (PTSD). Literature also show that cancer may also facilitate post-traumatic growth such as positive perceptions of oneself, emotional growth, improving relationships with others, and greater appreciation of life (65–67), although little is known about this area is TC.
Several studies have shown that TC patients treated with chemotherapy are at risk of long-term lower cognitive performance (22, 68–70). Chemotherapy, especially platinum-based treatment, is associated with paraesthesia, hypogonadism, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension (71), and also with memory problems and lower cognitive performance in TCSs (68). This condition, known as “chemo-brain” or “chemo-fog” has been described in other tumor types (72). In some cases, the prevalence of cognitive difficulties in TCSs is unexpectedly high, especially in terms of neuropsychological outcomes (73). Amidi et al. (74) found impairments related to verbal learning and memory (29–33% of TCSs), visual learning and memory (14–28%), processing speed (8–24%), executive functioning (17%), and attention and working memory (4–15%). However, it is worthy of note that no correlation between cognitive impairments and type of treatment has been identified (22, 68–70, 74, 75). Fung et al. consider that cognitive impairment could be related to anxiety and depression that are prevalent in this kind of patients (76).
Some studies evaluated the influence of different treatment modalities on quality of life: men who received the most aggressive treatment perceived the lowest HRQoL (8, 77). Each individual's experience with cancer is different. Cancer type and stage, type and severity of treatment, and subsequent physical effects may all contribute to how survivors “live” the experience of cancer, as well as to their levels of distress, personal growth, and QoL (78). TC, albeit curable in a high percentage of cases, has some aspects that make it an invasive emotional event and a particularly distressing experience. It mainly affects young men aged between 15 and 45 years during a central phase of their life cycle in which they are still constructing their own personal identity. The threat to existential continuity represented by cancer and the profound effect it has on body image and on personal values make this evolutionary transition a difficult one.
This in an important period of life, characterized by major life changes and specific developmental tasks. Indeed, these men are at or are near their prime of life, when interpersonal relationships, long-term work goals, and the desire to start a family may be major concerns (21, 54, 79, 80). Moreover, in this period of life health is generally taken for granted and life-threatening illnesses and dying are rarely considered possibilities (33).
The experience of TC may continue to influence the well-being of survivors and to interfere with the normal course of daily life months or even years after they are cured (54).
Physical and psychological consequences of treatment may interfere with life plans made before cancer, obliging survivors to review their short- and long-term goals. This may lead to impaired psychosocial functioning and more cancer-related distress (33).
A review of the literature on psychological and social domains showed that the majority of TCSs experience good levels of functioning and good post-therapeutic QoL, although a small percentage reported psychosocial problems such as anxiety, depression, fertility distress, sexual problems, and work-related problems (21, 40).
Qualitatively strong studies reviewed by Fleer et al. (21) indicated that the levels of psychological distress reported by TCSs varied between 9 and 27% (8, 23, 81). The study by Dahl et al. found that around 25% of TCSs became more anxious after diagnosis and treatment and that the distress experienced by TCSs is significantly higher than that of controls (81). However, other studies had different outcomes, e.g., a survey on QoL reported a slightly poorer mental health in TCSs than in a control group (7).
In the past, numerous studies have reported that the most frequent symptoms of emotional distress are tension, anxiety, restlessness, nervousness, and health worries (79). It has been seen that long-term TCSs continue to have significantly higher levels of anxiety (but not depression) many years after treatment compared to age-adjusted healthy males (1, 12, 23, 56). Substantially increased levels of anxiety among TCSs with respect to controls are associated with peripheral neuropathy, fear of recurrence, economic concerns, alcohol abuse, sexual difficulties, younger age at diagnosis, and a history of treatment for mental problems (12).
Among the possible causes of the increased anxiety experienced by a considerable proportion of TCS are a feeling of unsafety (54), a paradoxical perceived loss of protection by medical providers, a decrease in medical surveillance, and the perception of being completely on one's own. Symptoms of anxiety often occur before follow-up visits. Although the prevalence of depression among long-term TCSs corresponds to that observed in the general population (6, 56), some studies report a different frequency of self-reported depressive symptoms (79, 82). For example, Dahl et al. reported that depression was prevalent in 9–11% of TCSs up to 5 years after the end of treatment (56).
Thus, the overall picture regarding depression in TCSs is somewhat unclear (82). In general, differences in study results can be attributed to different aspects of distress evaluated, sampling differences in survivors, and the use of different validated questionnaires. A recent study assessed the prevalence of anxiety/depression in long-term TCSs, reporting anxiety in 6.1% of survivors and depression in 7.9%. Younger age at diagnosis and a shorter time since diagnosis were significantly associated with higher anxiety (83). A Polish study evaluated levels of anxiety/depression in 111 TC patients (57 undergoing chemotherapy and 54 patients at least 6 months after treatment). The prevalence of anxiety disorder was 40% during chemotherapy and 18.5% after treatment. Depression was present in 14.6% of patients during chemotherapy and in 9.3% after treatment. The prevalence of aggressiveness was 5.6% in patients during chemotherapy and 18.9% in the post-treatment group (84).
An Australian study conducted on 486 eligible TC survivors found small but significant increases in mean levels of anxiety and depression, a greater prevalence of extremely severe anxiety (19%) and depression (20%), and significant deficits in mainly mental aspects of generic HRQoL. The majority of TCSs reported one or more unmet needs regarding existential issues, more frequent than in breast and gynecological cancer survivors and probably correlated to the young age of the TCSs (64).
A diagnosis of cancer and associated treatments may represent a potentially ongoing threat and trigger recurring challenges. Indeed, this life-threatening illness is conceptualized as a potentially multidimensional traumatic event that risks compromising body integrity, leading to disability, disfigurement, pain and loss of social and occupational functioning, and creating dependence on others (24). Although most cancer survivors do not meet the criteria to be diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, they may nevertheless report painful re-experiencing of the cancer diagnosis and treatment-related events. Traumatic stress symptomatology in terms of intrusive thoughts about the disease, avoidance of reminders of cancer, and hyper-vigilance are commonly reported by survivors after completion of treatment (85).
Little is known about cancer-related stress symptoms in TCSs. Some studies (31, 55) have focused on the cancer-related stress symptoms of intrusion and avoidance, the core symptoms of PTSD (86). Fleer et al. (55) reported that a minority (13%) of TCSs experience clinically elevated levels of cancer-related stress symptoms. In particular, TCSs with a lower level of education and unemployed survivors reported higher levels of cancer-related stress symptoms than their counterparts. The authors also reported that the impact of the illness felt by TCSs on their current lives and their anxiety about the future contributed more significantly to distress than objective illness variables. Mykletun et al. (31) observed that TCSs who experienced more TC-related stress were more likely to report reduced QoL, but concluded that the stress was not attributable to treatment strategies. A recent study reported that in a sample of TCSs who were 11 years post-diagnosis, just over 10% had either subclinical or full PTSD. Probable PTSD was not related to time since TC diagnosis, but was significantly associated with cisplatin-related side effects, probable anxiety disorder, and poor self-rated health at 11 years post-diagnosis (87).
A recent study by Norwegian researchers evaluated the prevalence of chronic fatigue among 812 TC survivors. The risk of this disorder increased 3- to 4-fold for high levels of neuropathy vs. no neuropathy, and 2- to 3-fold for high levels of Raynaud-like phenomena and when testosterone levels were in the lowest quartile. Conversely, moderate to high physical activity had a protective effect against the syndrome (88).
Neuroticism in TCSs undergoing long-term follow-up is significantly associated with somatic and mental morbidities, self-esteem, concerns about not being able to father children, sexual problems, use of alcohol, sedatives and hypnotics, frequent visits to their G.P., and seeing a psychologist/psychiatrist (63).
Partnered Relationships
Cancer has considerable psychosocial implications related to the impact of the disease and its treatment on the individual from a psychological and spiritual point of view, and also from the perspective of interpersonal and social relationships (89, 90). The disease, far from being individual experience, also exerts a profound effect on patients' families. In particular, the partners of cancer patients are subject to a wide range of both emotional and practical repercussions throughout the course of the disease. For couples who face the survivorship phase, the main tasks include resuming a sexual relationship, discussing changes in life plans, deciding on health behavior changes, dealing with disease and treatment-related late effects that may influence patient functioning, managing worry about disease recurrence, and reflecting on the impact the cancer has had on themselves and the relationship (91).
Affective-relational life is an important theme in TC survivorship. It has been found that romantic relationships are associated with both positive (e.g., improved physical and emotional function) and negative aspects (e.g., new conflicts) (91). The majority of long-term TCSs and their wives report that their experience with cancer draws them closer as a couple, strengthening their mutual ties, trust, understanding, commitment to each other, and intimacy (92, 93). This aspect was also highlighted in a review on sexual functioning of TCSs and their partners (94). Although sexuality may be restricted or impaired by the experience of cancer, the decline in sexual satisfaction is usually very limited (44). As Jankowska explained, it is possible that patients who are facing a life-threatening disease may reorient their life's priorities and values with regard to sexuality and the relationship with their partner, reaping positive benefits such as greater intimacy and closeness (94). Thus, the psychological and affective aspects of the dyadic dimension may play a protective role in sexual function.
Relationship status (partnered vs. unpartnered) can play an important role in adjustment outcomes (91). Men who were involved in a relationship at the time of TC describe a better physical and emotional adaptation to the cancer experience (95, 96). Tuinman et al. also described positive outcomes and a higher level of functioning for survivors with a continuing relationship after diagnosis. In particular, they reported greater levels of social support, self-esteem and overall mental health compared with single TCSs and survivors who met their partner after the completion of treatment (97).
There is ample evidence in the literature about the relational difficulties experienced by individuals with a history of TC. For young adults involved or thinking about becoming involved in intimate relationships, the effect of TC treatment on sexual function, fertility, and overall future health may represent significant barriers to successful romantic and sexual relationships. Carpentier et al. describe 4 recurring themes related to testicular cancer diagnosis that can interfere and influence satisfaction in the romantic relationships of survivors: feeling different, viewing their differences as “damaged goods,” struggles with cancer-related disclosures, and feelings of embarrassment (98).
Survivors unpartnered during treatment express worry about their history of cancer affecting future interpersonal relationships (95, 99).
New relationship difficulties reported by TCSs and spouses concern communication problems centered on a fear of talking about the cancer, problems in understanding and expressing feelings with their respective partners, the possibility of recurrence, and implications for the future (93).
In some cases, TC exacerbates pre-existing relationship conflicts or creates new conflicts which ultimately lead to relationship dissolution. A cancer experience leads to a greater appreciation of life in which conflicts no longer have a place, thus leading survivors to end conflict-plagued relationships (91). The majority of TCSs (70–90%) are in partnered relationships when TC is diagnosed and the majority of follow-up studies show that the rate of divorce and broken relationships for TCSs is 5 to 10% (100). Conversely, Joly et al. reported that friendships were more likely to remain intact for TCSs than for controls (29). Similar results were obtained by Syse in terms of marriage percentages (101).
Reentry Problems
Social and functional life (work and study) issues faced by cancer survivors may include difficulties in transitioning from patient to healthy status, being regarded by others as “special,” feeling that one's job is not secure, experiencing discrimination and/or negative peer and employer attitudes (24). Several studies have been conducted to investigate reentry problems in cancer survivors and employment rate data vary considerably, ranging from 35 (102) to 67% for long-term survivors (103, 104). The differences in percentages may be attributable to different cancer types examined. However, a Finnish study reported only a 9% lower employment rate than that of the cancer-free population (105). This discrepancy may be correlated with the fact that people with a higher level of education have a greater chance of being employed after their cancer diagnosis than less educated patients job type is also a factor, e.g., manual labor is negatively associated with a return to work due to its physically strenuous nature (106, 107). With regard to TCSs, coping behavior is not only needed for human relationships, but also for work situations. Rutskij et al. reported that TCSs with poorer avoidance coping skills fared worse in terms of paired relationships and paid work than TCSs with a better approach to coping (108). Another study showed that TCSs diagnosed <5 years earlier reported more absenteeism than controls, whereas there was no difference between controls and survivors diagnosed >5 years earlier (109). An interesting study conducted among breast, testicular and prostate cancer survivors in Northern Europe (NOCWO trial) did not reveal any differences in work engagement between cancer survivors and other employees, despite all of the problems reported by survivors, i.e., poorer health status, physical QoL, and work ability, more anxiety, and significantly higher neuroticism (110).
Within this context, recent studies have highlighted the importance of post-treatment psychosocial and behavioral interventions (111). In particular, knowledge that one's job is secure should be acknowledged as a prerequisite for normal living conditions (112). Improving communication at the workplace and developing supportive leadership practices are needed to avoid isolating behavior in cancer survivors (113).
Conclusions
TC is perhaps the paradigm of cancers with problems related to a long-term survival. There are 2 fundamental reasons for this, i.e., the curability of a high number of patients, leading to better long-term survival, but also the onset at a young age, leading to problems that differ from those arising from tumors diagnosed later in life. Such problems, including individual health, sexual relationships and work problems, affect several important aspects of survival and significantly influence the QoL of long-term survivors. Recently, a web-based computer-tailored intervention, the Kanker Nazorg Wijzer (Cancer Aftercare Guide), was developed in the Netherlands with the aim of providing psychosocial and lifestyle support for cancer survivors. It not only provides the most appropriate advice regarding physical activity, diet etc., but also measures psychosocial well-being by assessing QoL, psychological distress, mental adjustment to cancer, fatigue, work limitations, and social support. This tool is not yet suitable for use for TCS-related problems (114, 115).
As far as we know, QoL evaluations in long-term TCSs have only been conducted in single country trials. Recently, however, some studies have begun assessing the feasibility of collecting QoL data among TCSs recruited from different countries (116, 117). To better understand the impact of TC on QoL it is important to know how sociocultural differences in sexuality, masculinity and fertility influence the survivors. This problem exist and is still very wide. Educational events, patients associations and the development of Cancer Aftercare Guides, as like as the abovementioned Dutch project, could provide some solutions to a better awareness about the importance of QoL in TCSs.
Author Contributions
GS and SD have collaborated in the conception, in the data retrieval, and in the drafting of the text. DD and CC have collaborated in the revision of the text and in the completion of the bibliographic research. EM, FR, GRo, CL, GRa, VC, AF, LG, and UD revised the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Shinn EH, Swartz RJ, Thornton BB, Spiess PE, Pisters LL, Basen-Engquist KM. Testis cancer survivors' health behaviors: comparison with age-matched relative and demographically matched population controls. J Clin Oncol. (2010) 28:2274–79. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9608
2. Mead GM, Stenning SP. The International Germ Cell Consensus Classification: a new prognostic factor-based staging classification for metastatic germ cell tumours. Clin Oncol. (1997) 9:207–9. doi: 10.1016/S0936-6555(97)80001-5
3. Albers P, Albrecht W, Algaba F, Bokemeyer C, Cohn-Cedermark G, Fizazi K, et al. Guidelines on testicular cancer: 2015 update. Eur Urol. (2015) 68:1054–68. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.044
4. Verdecchia A, Francisci S, Brenner H, Gatta G, Micheli A, Mangone L, et al. Recent cancer survival in Europe: a 2000-02 period analysis of EUROCARE-4 data. Lancet Oncol. (2007) 8:784–96. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70246-2
5. Ries L, Melbert D, Krapcho M, Stinchcomb D, Howlader N, Horner M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2005. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute (2008).
6. Gilligan T. Quality of life among testis cancer survivors. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig. (2015) 33:413–9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.05.018
7. Fleer J, Hoekstra HJ, Sleijfer DT, Tuinman MA, Klip EC, Hoekstra-Weebers JEHM. Quality of life of testicular cancer survivors and the relationship with sociodemographics, cancer-related variables, and life events. Support Care Cancer (2006) 14:251–9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0879-3
8. Rossen PB, Pedersen AF, Zachariae R, Von Der Maase H. Health-related quality of life in long-term survivors of testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol. (2009) 27:5993–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6931
9. Hashibe M, Abdelaziz S, Al-Temimi M, Fraser A, Boucher KM, Smith K, et al. Long-term health effects among testicular cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. (2016) 10:1051–7. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0548-1
10. Nord C, Mykletun A, Thorsen L, Bjøro T, Fosså SD. Self-reported health and use of health care services in long-term cancer survivors. Int J Cancer (2005) 114:307–16. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20713
11. De Giorgi U, Demirer T, Wandt H, Taverna C, Siegert W, Bornhauser M, et al. Second-line high-dose chemotherapy in patients with mediastinal and retroperitoneal primary non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: the EBMT experience. Ann Oncol. (2005) 16:146–51. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi017
12. Dahl AA, Mykletun A, Fosså SD. Quality of life in survivors of testicular cancer. Urol Oncol. (2005) 23:193–200. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2005.03.004
13. Stava C, Beck M, Schultz PN, Vassilopoulou-Sellin R. Hearing loss among cancer survivors. Oncol Rep. (2005) 13:1193–9. doi: 10.3892/or.13.6.1193
14. Haugnes HS, Aass N, Fosså SD, Dahl O, Brydøy M, Aasebø U, et al. Pulmonary function in long-term survivors of testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol. (2009) 27:2779–86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.5181
15. Travis LB, Fosså SD, Schonfeld SJ, McMaster ML, Lynch CF, Storm H, et al. Second cancers among 40 576 testicular cancer patients: Focus on long-term survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2005) 97:1354–6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji278
16. De Giorgi U, Rosti G, Slavin S, Yaniv I, Harousseau JL, Ladenstein R, et al. Salvage high-dose chemotherapy for children with extragonadal germ-cell tumours. Br J Cancer (2005) 93:412–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602724
17. Fizazi K, Oldenburg J, Dunant A, Chen I, Salvioni R, Hartmann JT, et al. Assessing prognosis and optimizing treatment in patients with postchemotherapy viable nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors (NSGCT): results of the sCR2 international study. Ann Oncol. (2008) 19:259–64. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm472
18. De Giorgi U, Rosti G, Aieta M, Testore F, Burattini L, Fornarini G, et al. Phase II study of oxaliplatin and gemcitabine salvage chemotherapy in patients with cisplatin-refractory nonseminomatous germ cell tumor. Eur Urol. (2006) 50:1032–8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.05.011
19. Chovanec M, Cierna Z, Miskovska V, Machalekova K, Kalavska K, Rejlekova K, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index in germ-cell tumours. Br J Cancer (2018) 118:831–8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.460
20. Fegg MJ, Gerl A, Vollmer TC, Gruber U, Jost C, Meiler S, et al. Subjective quality of life and sexual functioning after germ-cell tumour therapy. Br J Cancer (2003) 89:2202–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601421
21. Fleer J, Hoekstra HJ, Sleijfer DT, Hoekstra-Weebers JEHM. Quality of life of survivors of testicular germ cell cancer: a review of the literature. Support Care Cancer (2004) 12:476–86. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0646-x
22. Skaali T, Fosså SD, Bremnes R, Dahl O, Haaland CF, Hauge ER, et al. Fear of recurrence in long-term testicular cancer survivors. Psychooncology (2009) 18:580–8. doi: 10.1002/pon.1437
23. Fossa SD, Dahl AA, Loge JH. Fatigue, anxiety, and depression in long-term survivors of testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol. (2003) 21:1249–54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.08.163
24. Holland JC, Reznik I. Pathways for psychosocial care of cancer survivors. Cancer (2005) 104:2624–37. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21252
25. Rowland DL, Incrocci L. Handbook of Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons (2008).
26. Dahl AA, Bremnes R, Dahl O, Klepp O, Wist E, Fosså SD. Is the sexual function compromised in long-term testicular cancer survivors? Eur Urol. (2007) 52:1438–47. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.046
27. Gunnes MW, Lie RT, Bjørge T, Ghaderi S, Ruud E, Syse A, et al. Reproduction and marriage among male survivors of cancer in childhood, adolescence and young adulthood: a national cohort study. Br J Cancer (2016) 114:348–56. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.455
28. Rossen P, Pedersen AF, Zachariae R, Von Der Maase H. Sexuality and body image in long-term survivors of testicular cancer. Eur J Cancer (2012) 48:571–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.029
29. Joly F, Héron JF, Kalusinski L, Bottet P, Brune D, Allouache N, et al. Quality of life in long-term survivors of testicular cancer: a population-based case-control study. J Clin Oncol. (2002) 20:73–80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.1.73
30. Kim C, McGlynn KA, McCorkle R, Erickson RL, Niebuhr DW, Ma S, et al. Quality of life among testicular cancer survivors: a case-control study in the United States. Qual Life Res. (2011) 20:1629–37. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9907-6
31. Mykletun A, Dahl AA, Haaland CF, Bremnes R, Dahl O, Klepp O, et al. Side effects and cancer-related stress determine quality of life in long-term survivors of testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol. (2005) 23:3061–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.048
32. Thorsen L, Nystad W, Dahl O, Klepp O, Bremnes RM, Wist E, et al. The level of physical activity in long-term survivors of testicular cancer. Eur J Cancer (2003) 39:1261–21. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00151-5
33. Fleer J, Hoekstra HJ, Sleijfer DT, Tuinman MA, Hoekstra-Weebers JEHM. The role of meaning in the prediction of psychosocial well-being of testicular cancer survivors. Qual Life Res. (2006) 15:705–17. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-3569-1
34. Deimling GT, Bowman KF, Sterns S, Wagner LJ, Kahana B. Cancer-related health worries and psychological distress among older adult, long-term cancer survivors. Psychooncology (2006) 15:306–20. doi: 10.1002/pon.955
35. Simard S, Savard J, Ivers H. Fear of cancer recurrence: specific profiles and nature of intrusive thoughts. J Cancer Surviv. (2010) 4:361–71. doi: 10.1007/s11764-010-0136-8
36. Oldenburg J, Martin JM, Fosså SD. Late relapses of germ cell malignancies: incidence, management, and prognosis. J Clin Oncol. (2006) 24:5503–11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.1836
37. Oldenburg J, Alfsen GC, Wæhre H, Fosså SD. Late recurrences of germ cell malignancies: a population-based experience over three decades. Br J Cancer (2006) 94:820–27. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603014
38. Fosså SD, De Wit R, Roberts JT, Wilkinson PM, De Mulder PHM, Mead GM, et al. Quality of life in good prognosis patients with metastatic germ cell cancer: a prospective study of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer genitourinary group/medical research council testicular cancer study group (30941/TE20). J Clin Oncol. (2003) 21:1107–18. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.02.075
39. Hartmann JT, Albrecht C, Schmoll HJ, Kuczyk MA, Kollmannsberger C, Bokemeyer C. Long-term effects on sexual function and fertility after treatment of testicular cancer. Br J Cancer (1999) 80:801–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690424
40. Jonker-Pool G, Van De Wiel HBM, Hoekstra HJ, Sleijfer DT, Van Driel MF, Van Basten JP, et al. sexual functioning after treatment for testicular cancer - review and meta-analysis of 36 empirical studies between 1975–2000. Arch Sex Behav. (2001) 30:55–74. doi: 10.1023/A:1026468707362
41. Nazareth I, Lewin J, King M. Sexual dysfunction after treatment for testicular cancer: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res. (2001) 51:735–43. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00282-3
42. Bandak M, Lauritsen J, Johansen C, Kreiberg M, Skøtt JW, Agerbaek M, et al. Sexual function in a nationwide cohort of 2,260 survivors of testicular cancer after 17 Years of followup. J Urol. (2018) 200:794–800. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.077
43. Van Basten JPA, Van Driel MF, Hoekstra HJ, Sleijfer DT, Van De Wiel HBM, Droste JHJ, et al. Objective and subjective effects of treatment for testicular cancer on sexual function. BJU Int. (1999) 84:671–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00262.x
44. Jonker-Pool G, Van Basten JP, Hoekstra HJ, Van Driel MF, Sleijfer DT, Koops HS, et al. Sexual functioning after treatment for testicular cancer: Comparison of treatment modalities. Cancer (1997) 80:454–64. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970801)80:3<454::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-W
45. Gurevich M, Bishop S, Bower J, Malka M, Nyhof-Young J. (Dis)embodying gender and sexuality in testicular cancer. Soc Sci Med. (2004) 58:1597–607. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00371-X
46. Skoogh J, Steineck G, Cavallin-Ståhl E, Wilderäng U, Håkansson UK, Johansson B, et al. Feelings of loss and uneasiness or shame after removal of a testicle by orchidectomy: a population-based long-term follow-up of testicular cancer survivors. Int J Androl. (2011) 34:183–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2010.01073.x
47. Tuinman MA, Fleer J, Sleijfer DT, Hoekstra HJ, Hoekstra-Weebers JEHM. Marital and sexual satisfaction in testicular cancer survivors and their spouses. Support Care Cancer (2005) 13:540–8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0758-3
48. Rudberg L, Carlsson M, Nilsson S, Wikblad K. Self-perceived physical, psychologic, and general symptoms in survivors of testicular cancer 3 to 13 years after treatment. Cancer Nurs. (2002) 25:187–95. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200206000-00003
49. van Basten JP, Jonker-Pool G, van Driel MF, Sleijfer DT, van der Wiel HBM, Hoekstra HJ. The sexual sequelae of testicular cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. (1995) 21:479–95. doi: 10.1016/0305-7372(95)90031-4
50. Dimitropoulos K, Karatzas A, Papandreou C, Daliani D, Zachos I, Pisters LL, et al. Sexual dysfunction in testicular cancer patients subjected to post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a focus beyond ejaculation disorders. Andrologia (2016) 48:425–30. doi: 10.1111/and.12462
51. Bumbasirevic U, Bojanic N, Pekmezovic T, Janjic A, Janicic A, Milojevic B, et al. Health-related quality of life, depression, and sexual function in testicular cancer survivors in a developing country: a Serbian experience. Support Care Cancer (2013) 21:757–63. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1577-6
52. Capogrosso P, Boeri L, Ferrari M, Ventimiglia E, La Croce G, Capitanio U, et al. Long-term recovery of normal sexual function in testicular cancer survivors. Asian J Androl. (2016) 18:85–9. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.149180
53. Foster C, Wright D, Hill H, Hopkinson J, Roffe L. Psychosocial implications of living 5 years or more following a cancer diagnosis: a systematic review of the research evidence. Eur J Cancer Care (2009) 18:223–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.01001.x
54. Jones GY, Payne S. Searching for safety signals: the experience of medical surveillance amongst men with testicular teratomas. Psychooncology (2000) 9:385–94. doi: 10.1002/1099-1611(200009/10)9:5<385::AID-PON467>3.0.CO;2-B
55. Fleer J, Sleijfer D, Hoekstra H, Tuinman M, Klip E, Hoekstra-Weebers J. Objective and subjective predictors of cancer-related stress symptoms in testicular cancer survivors. Patient Educ Couns. (2006) 64:142–50. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.12.009
56. Shinn EH, Basen-Engquist K, Thornton B, Spiess PE, Pisters L. Health behaviors and depressive symptoms in testicular cancer survivors. Urology (2007) 69:748–53. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.12.022
57. Haugnes HS, Bosl GJ, Boer H, Gietema JA, Brydyø M, Oldenburg J, et al. Long-term and late effects of germ cell testicular cancer treatment and implications for follow-up. J Clin Oncol. (2012) 30:3752–63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.4431
58. Stanton AL. Psychosocial concerns and interventions for cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. (2006) 24:5132–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8775
59. Burgess C, Cornelius V, Love S, Graham J, Richards M, Ramirez A. Depression and anxiety in women with early breast cancer: Five year observational cohort study. Br Med J. (2005) 330:702. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38343.670868.D3
60. Korfage IJ, Essink-Bot ML, Janssens ACJW, Schröder FH, De Koning HJ. Anxiety and depression after prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment: 5-Year follow-up. Br J Cancer (2006) 94:1093–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603057
61. Inhestern L, Beierlein V, Bultmann JC, Möller B, Romer G, Koch U, et al. Anxiety and depression in working-age cancer survivors: a register-based study. BMC Cancer (2017) 17:347. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3347-9
62. Mitchell AJ, Ferguson DW, Gill J, Paul J, Symonds P. Depression and anxiety in long-term cancer survivors compared with spouses and healthy controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. (2013) 14:721–32. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70244-4
63. Grov EK, Foss SD, Bremnes RM, Dahl O, Klepp O, Wist E, et al. The personality trait of neuroticism is strongly associated with long-term morbidity in testicular cancer survivors. Acta Oncol. (2009) 48:842–9. doi: 10.1080/02841860902795232
64. Smith AB, Butow P, Olver I, Luckett T, Grimison P, Toner GC, et al. The prevalence, severity, and correlates of psychological distress and impaired health-related quality of life following treatment for testicular cancer: a survivorship study. J Cancer Surviv. (2016) 10:223–33. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0468-5
65. Cordova MJ, Andrykowski MA. Responses to cancer diagnosis and treatment: posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth. Semin Neuropsychiatry (2003) 8:286–96.
66. Kangas M, Henry JL, Bryant RA. Posttraumatic stress disorder following cancer: a conceptual and empirical review. Clin Psychol Rev. (2002) 22:499–524. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(01)00118-0
67. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. Posttraumatic growth: conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychol Inq. (2004) 15:1–18. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01
68. Stouten-Kemperman MM, de Ruiter MB, Caan MWA, Boogerd W, Kerst MJ, Reneman L, et al. Lower cognitive performance and white matter changes in testicular cancer survivors 10 years after chemotherapy. Hum Brain Mapp. (2015) 36:4638–47. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22942
69. Wefel JS, Vidrine DJ, Marani SK, Swartz RJ, Veramonti TL, Meyers CA, et al. A prospective study of cognitive function in men with non-seminomatous germ cell tumors. Psychooncology (2014) 23:626–33. doi: 10.1002/pon.3453
70. Joly F, Giffard B, Rigal O, De Ruiter MB, Small BJ, Dubois M, et al. Impact of cancer and its treatments on cognitive function: advances in research from the Paris international cognition and cancer task force symposium and update since 2012. J Pain Symptom Manage. (2015) 50:830–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.06.019
71. Boer H, Proost JH, Nuver J, Bunskoek S, Gietema JQ, Geubels BM, et al. Long-term exposure to circulating platinum is associated with late effects of treatment in testicular cancer survivors. Ann Oncol. (2015) 26:2305–10. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv369
72. Vasilkova L. [Impact of treatments to improve cognitive function and quality of life on cancer patients with carcinoma of the testes]. Klin Onkol. (2016) 29:267–73. doi: 10.14735/amko2016267
73. Schagen SB, Boogerd W, Muller MJ, Huinink WTB, Moonen L, Meinhardt W, et al. Cognitive complaints and cognitive impairment following BEP chemotherapy in patients with testicular cancer. Acta Oncol. (2008) 47:63–70. doi: 10.1080/02841860701518058
74. Amidi A, Wu LM, Pedersen AD, Mehlsen M, Pedersen CG, Rossen P, et al. Cognitive impairment in testicular cancer survivors 2 to 7 years after treatment. Support Care Cancer (2015) 23:2973–9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2663-3
75. Pedersen AD, Rossen P, Mehlsen MY, Pedersen CG, Zachariae R, Von der maase H. Long-term cognitive function following chemotherapy in patients with testicular cancer. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. (2009) 15:296–301. doi: 10.1017/S1355617709090316
76. Fung C, Dinh P, Ardeshir-Rouhani-Fard S, Schaffer K, Fossa SD, Travis LB. Toxicities associated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy in long-term testicular cancer survivors. Adv Urol. (2018) 18:8671832. doi: 10.1155/2018/8671832
77. Zebrack B, Yi J, Petersen L, Ganz P. The impact of cancer and quality of life for long-term survivors. Psycho-Oncologycology (2008) 18:8671832. doi: 10.1002/pon.1300
78. Vidrine DJ, Hoekstra-Weebers JEHM, Hoekstra HJ, Tuinman MA, Marani S, Gritz ER. The effects of testicular cancer treatment on health-related quality of life. Urology (2010) 75:636–41. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.053
79. Arai Y, Kawakita M, Hida S, Terachi T, Okada Y, Yoshida O. Psychosocial aspects in long-term survivors of testicular cancer. J Urol. (1996) 155:574–8. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66452-8
80. Dearnaley D. Regular review: managing testicular cancer. BMJ (2001) 322:1583–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7302.1583
81. Dahl AA, Haaland CF, Mykletun A, Bremnes R, Dahl O, Klepp O, et al. Study of anxiety disorder and depression in long-term survivors of testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol. (2005) 23:2389–95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.061
82. Fosså SD, Oldenburg J, Dahl AA. Short- and long-term morbidity after treatment for testicular cancer. BJU Int. (2009) 104:1418–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08869.x
83. Vehling S, Mehnert A, Hartmann M, Oing C, Bokemeyer C, Oechsle K. Anxiety and depression in long-term testicular germ cell tumor survivors. Gen Hosp Psychiatry (2016) 38:21–5. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.09.001
84. Osmanska M, Borkowska A, Makarewicz R. [Evaluation of quality of life, anxiety and depression in testicular cancer patients during chemotherapy and after anticancer treatment]. Psychiatr Pol. (2010) 44:543–56.
85. Jim HSL, Jacobsen PB. Posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth in cancer survivorship: a review. Cancer J. (2008) 14:414–9. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31818d8963
86. Gurevich M, Devins GM, Rodin GM. Stress response syndromes and cancer: conceptual and assessment issues. Psychosomatics (2002) 43:259–81. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.43.4.259
87. Dahl AA, Østby-Deglum M, Oldenburg J, Bremnes R, Dahl O, Klepp O, et al. Aspects of posttraumatic stress disorder in long-term testicular cancer survivors: cross-sectional and longitudinal findings. J Cancer Surviv. (2016) 10:842–9. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0529-4
88. Sprauten M, Haugnes HS, Brydøy M, Kiserud C, Tandstad T, Bjøro T, et al. Chronic fatigue in 812 testicular cancer survivors during long-term follow-up: increasing prevalence and risk factors. Ann Oncol. (2015) 26:2133–40. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv328
89. Girgis A, Lambert S. Caregivers of cancer survivors: the state of the field. Cancer Forum (2009) 33:167–71.
90. Caruso R, Nanni MG, Riba MB, Sabato S, Grassi L. The burden of psychosocial morbidity related to cancer: patient and family issues. Int Rev Psychiatry (2017) 29:389–402. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2017.1288090
91. Carpentier MY, Fortenberry JD. Romantic and sexual relationships, body image, and fertility in adolescent and young adult testicular cancer survivors: a review of the literature. J Adolesc Heal. (2010) 47:115–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.04.005
92. Gritz ER, Wellisch DK, Siau J, Wang HJ. Long-term effects of testicular cancer on marital relationships. Psychosomatics (1990) 31:301–12. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(90)72168-8
93. Hannah MT, Gritz ER, Wellisch DK, Fobair P, Hoppe RT, Bloom JR, et al. Changes in marital and sexual functioning in long-term survivors and their spouses: testicular cancer versus hodgkin's disease. Psycho-Oncology (1992) 1:89–103.
94. Jankowska M. Sexual functioning of testicular cancer survivors and their partners - A review of literature. Reports Pract Oncol Radiother. (2012) 17:54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2011.11.001
95. Brodsky MS. Testicular cancer survivors' impressions of the impact of the disease on their lives. Qual Health Res. (1995) 5:96.
96. Sheppard C, Wylie KR. An assessment of sexual difficulties in men after treatment for testicular cancer. Sex Relatsh Ther. (2001) 16:47–58. doi: 10.1080/14681990124325
97. Tuinman MA, Hoekstra HJ, Fleer J, Sleijfer DT, Hoekstra-Weebers JEHM. Self-esteem, social support, and mental health in survivors of testicular cancer: a comparison based on relationship status{star, open}. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig. (2006) 24:279–86. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2005.06.023
98. Carpentier MY, Fortenberry JD, Ott MA, Brames MJ, Einhorn LH. Perceptions of masculinity and self-image in adolescent and young adult testicular cancer survivors: Implications for romantic and sexual relationships. Psychooncology (2011) 20:738–45. doi: 10.1002/pon.1772
99. Ozen H, Sahin A, Toklu C, Rastadoskouee M, Kilic C, Gogus A, et al. Psychosocial adjustment after testicular cancer treatment. J Urol. (1998)159:1947–50. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63204-X
100. Fosså SD, Travis LB, Dahl AA. Medical and psychosocial issues in testicular cancer survivors. In: Oncology: An Evidence-Based Approach. New York, NY: Springer. p. 1825–37. doi: 10.1007/0-387-31056-8_104
101. Syse A. Does cancer affect marriage rates? J Cancer Surviv. (2008) 2:205–14. doi: 10.1007/s11764-008-0062-1
102. Schultz PN, Beck ML, Stava C, Sellin R V. Cancer survivors. Work related issues. AAOHN J. (2002) 50:220–6. doi: 10.1177/216507990205000508
103. Bradley CJ, Bednarek HL. Employment patterns of long-term cancer survivors. Psychooncology (2002) 11:188–98. doi: 10.1002/pon.544
104. Verbeek J, Spelten E, Kammeijer M, Sprangers M. Return to work of cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study into the quality of rehabilitation by occupational physicians. Occup Environ Med. (2003) 60:353–7. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.5.352
105. Taskila-Åbrandt T, Martikainen R, Virtanen SV, Pukkala E, Hietanen P, Lindbohm ML. The impact of education and occupation on the employment status of cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer (2004) 40:2488–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.06.031
106. Abrahamsen AF, Loge JH, Hannisdal E, Holte H, Kvaløy S. Socio-medical situation for long-term survivors of Hodgkin's disease: a survey of 459 patients treated at one institution. Eur J Cancer (1998) 34:1865–70.
107. Spelten ER, Sprangers MAG, Verbeek JHAM. Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. Psychooncology (2002) 11:124–31. doi: 10.1002/pon.585
108. Rutskij R, Gaarden T, Bremnes R, Dahl O, Finset A, Fossa SD, et al. A study of coping in long-term testicular cancer survivors. Psychol Heal Med. (2010) 15:146–58. doi: 10.1080/13548501003623955
109. Soejima T, Kamibeppu K. Are cancer survivors well-performing workers? A systematic review. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. (2016) 12:e383–e97. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12515
110. Berg Gudbergsson S, Fosså SD, Dahl AA. Is cancer survivorship associated with reduced work engagement? A NOCWO study. J Cancer Surviv. (2008) 2:159–68. doi: 10.1007/s11764-008-0059-9
111. Stanton AL, Rowland JH, Ganz PA. Life after diagnosis and treatment of cancer in adulthood: contributions from psychosocial oncology research. Am Psychol. (2015) 70:159–74. doi: 10.1037/a0037875
112. Gudbergsson SB, Fosså SD, Borgeraas E, Dahl AA. A comparative study of living conditions in cancer patients who have returned to work after curative treatment. Support Care Cancer (2006) 14:1020–29. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0042-9
113. Lindbohm ML, Taskila T, Kuosma E, Hietanen P, Carlsen K, Gudbergsson S, et al. Work ability of survivors of breast, prostate, and testicular cancer in Nordic countries: a NOCWO study. J Cancer Surviv. (2012) 6:72–81. doi: 10.1007/s11764-011-0200-z
114. Willems RA, Bolman CAW, Mesters I, Kanera IM, Beaulen AAJM, Lechner L. The Kanker Nazorg Wijzer (Cancer Aftercare Guide) protocol: the systematic development of a web-based computer tailored intervention providing psychosocial and lifestyle support for cancer survivors. BMC Cancer (2015) 15:580. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1588-z
115. Kanera IM, Bolman CAW, Willems RA, Mesters I, Lechner L. Lifestyle-related effects of the web-based Kanker Nazorg Wijzer (Cancer Aftercare Guide) intervention for cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. J Cancer Surviv. (2016) 10:883–97. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0535-6
116. Holzner B, Efficace F, Basso U, Johnson CD, Aaronson NK, Arraras JI, et al. Cross-cultural development of an EORTC questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in patients with testicular cancer: the EORTC QLQ-TC26. Qual Life Res. (2013) 22:369–78. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0147-1
117. Van Leeuwen M, Efficace F, Fosså SD, Bolla M, De Giorgi U, De Wit R, et al. Recruiting long-term survivors of European Organisation for research and treatment of cancer phase III clinical trials into quality of life studies: challenges and opportunities. Eur J Cancer (2014) 50:1957–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.04.018
Keywords: testicular cancer, survivors, psychological concerns, sexual problems, reentry
Citation: Schepisi G, De Padova S, De Lisi D, Casadei C, Meggiolaro E, Ruffilli F, Rosti G, Lolli C, Ravaglia G, Conteduca V, Farolfi A, Grassi L and De Giorgi U (2019) Psychosocial Issues in Long-Term Survivors of Testicular Cancer. Front. Endocrinol. 10:113. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00113
Received: 08 January 2019; Accepted: 07 February 2019;
Published: 25 February 2019.
Edited by:
Gabriella Castoria, Second University of Naples, ItalyReviewed by:
Marzia Di Donato, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli Caserta, ItalyErika Di Zazzo, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli Caserta, Italy
Copyright © 2019 Schepisi, De Padova, De Lisi, Casadei, Meggiolaro, Ruffilli, Rosti, Lolli, Ravaglia, Conteduca, Farolfi, Grassi and De Giorgi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Giuseppe Schepisi, Z2l1c2VwcGUuc2NoZXBpc2lAaXJzdC5lbXIuaXQ=