95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
Daniel Price1Debra Burris1Anna Cloutier1Carol B. Thompson2James K. Rilling3,4,5,6
Richmond R. Thompson7*
- 1Department of Psychiatry, Maine Medical Center, Maine Health, Portland, OR, United States
- 2Biostatistics Center, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, United States
- 3Department of Anthropology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- 4Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- 5Center for Translational Social Neuroscience, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- 6The Center for Social Neuroscience, Atlanta, GA, United States
- 7Neuroscience Program, Psychology Department, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, GA, United States
A corrigendum on
In the original article, there was a mistake in the legend for Figure 5 as published. The legend should have only alluded to one dotted line in each panel indicating average responses to all faces on day 1 in single men who received placebo on that day. The correct legend appears below.
FIGURE 5
Figure 5. Mean ± SEM of approachability (A), initiate (B), and attractiveness (C) ratings, averaged across sex, on the final day of testing when no drug was given in men who received 20 or 40 IU on day 1. The dotted line shows mean response to all faces on day 1 in men who received placebo on that day.
In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 5 as published. The subject numbers at the bottom of the graph were incorrect. The corrected Figure 5 appears below.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that these do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article was updated.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Keywords: social behavior, V1a receptor, social context, intranasal, face processing
Citation: Price D, Burris D, Cloutier A, Thompson CB, Rilling JK and Thompson RR (2017) Corrigendum: Dose-Dependent and Lasting Influences of Intranasal Vasopressin on Face Processing in Men. Front. Endocrinol. 8:334. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00334
Received: 07 November 2017; Accepted: 10 November 2017;
Published: 28 November 2017
Edited and Reviewed by: Aras Petrulis, Georgia State University, United States
Copyright: © 2017 Price, Burris, Cloutier, Thompson, Rilling and Thompson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Richmond R. Thompson, cnRob21wc29AYm93ZG9pbi5lZHU=