Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Endocrinol., 03 October 2017
Sec. Thyroid Endocrinology
This article is part of the Research Topic TSH Receptor and Autoimmunity View all 13 articles

Expanding the Role of Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone in Skeletal Physiology

  • 1Thyroid Research Unit, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and the James J. Peters VA Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
  • 2The Mount Sinai Bone Program, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States

The dogma that thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) solely regulates the production of thyroid hormone from the thyroid gland has hampered research on its wider physiological roles. The action of pituitary TSH on the skeleton has now been well described; in particular, its action on osteoblasts and osteoclasts. It has also been recently discovered that the bone marrow microenvironment acts as an endocrine circuit with bone marrow-resident macrophages capable of producing a novel TSH-β subunit variant (TSH-βv), which may modulate skeletal physiology. Interestingly, the production of this TSH-βv is positively regulated by T3 accentuating such modulation in the presence of thyroid overactivity. Furthermore, a number of small molecule ligands acting as TSH agonists, which allosterically modulate the TSH receptor have been identified and may have similar modulatory influences on bone cells suggesting therapeutic potential. This review summarizes our current understanding of the role of TSH, TSH-β, TSH-βv, and small molecule agonists in bone physiology.

Introduction

The skeleton has a wide range of functions, which include structural support/protection, locomotion, and mineral homeostasis. In addition, the emerging role of bone as an endocrine unit is rapidly gaining momentum because bone secretes a variety of hormones such as osteocalcin, osteoprotegerin, osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor, sclerostin, and fibroblast growth factor 23 (1), and it has recently also been shown to be the source of a variant form of TSH-β subunit (24). Bone is derived from intramembranous ossification of fibrous membranes and from endochondrial ossification of hyaline cartilage during fetal development. Osteoblasts and osteoclasts, two major cell types found in bone, are derived from unique cell lineages. Osteoblasts differentiate from the mesenchymal lineage while osteoclasts are from the hematopoietic stem cell lineage. The close balance in their activity during bone remodeling between the osteoblasts-inducing bone deposition and osteoclasts-inducing bone resorption appears to be crucial for precise maturation and preservation of bone integrity. However, the bony skeleton can be structurally and functionally altered by various diseases, drugs and extra-skeletal hormones, growth factors, and cytokines as well as mechanical forces (1).

An overactive thyroid gland has long been known to be associated with significant bone loss (5). Osteoporosis is seen in many overt hyperthyroid states, most commonly Graves’ disease and toxic multinodular goiter (69). In addition, excessive thyroid hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women is known to contribute to bone loss (10). Hence, bone turnover is increased and bone mass decreased when thyroid hormone levels are high and TSH levels are low and such changes in bone can also be seen in animal models (5, 11). In these conditions under which bone is loss, TSH levels in the serum fall to insignificant concentrations, but thyroid hormones (T3 and T4) may vary from high to normal, thus arguing for a role of TSH or other TSH receptor agonists in preventing bone loss. This review highlights the role of TSH, TSH-βv, and small molecules on skeletal biology.

The Hypothalamic–Pituitary Axis

Thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) also known as thyroliberin was first isolated by Schally and Guillemin in 1969 (12, 13). TRH is synthesized in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and it regulates both the synthesis and release of TSH from the anterior pituitary (14). The production of the TSH-β subunit in the pituitary is regulated by both the CREB-binding transcription factors and the pituitary-specific transcription factor-1 (14) while thyroid hormone levels (T4 and T3) being preserved by a negative feedback loop (Figure 1). TSH in turn acts through the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) to induce the synthesis and release of T4 and a smaller amount of T3 with additional T3 being derived by peripheral deiodination (15). Additionally, thyroid hormones then exert actions through the thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) to inhibit TRH and TSH synthesis and its secretion. As such, when thyroid hormones are high, the TSH levels are low.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. The hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid–bone axis. This simplified figure illustrates the interactions of the pituitary hormone thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyroid hormones T3 and T4 with bone. A negative feedback loop with origins in the thyroid and projections to the pituitary and hypothalamus is depicted. T3 and T4 hormone levels are maintained by such a loop. The role of TSH on bone has been hampered by the dogma that TSH exerts functions exclusively within the thyroid. However, within the past few decades, TSH has been show to exert physiologic effects on both osteoblasts and osteoclasts.

Structure and Function of the TSH Molecule

Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and follicle-stimulating hormone, along with chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and luteinizing hormone, are heterodimeric proteins that share a common α-chain and unique β-chains, which confer hormone specificity. Both mouse and man TSH-β subunits share significant homology (16, 17). In these species, the TSH-β contains 138 amino acids with 20 of them representing the signal peptide and the other 118 the mature protein. The common α-chain is made up of 92 amino acids. The α-subunit gene shows a general expression pattern compared to the TSH-β subunit gene expression, which is restricted to the anterior pituitary. Although TSH-α and TSH-β are transcribed from different genes, it is generally understood that the molecular interaction of the α-subunit and the TSH-β subunit confers specificity to the molecule (18). TSH interacts with the G-protein-coupled TSHR (19, 20) in controlling thyroid function and it also has extrathyroidal activity via TSHR expression at a variety of sites (21). Of relevance here is that pituitary TSH has been shown to be osteoprotective in vitro and in vivo by activating osteoblasts and inhibiting osteoclasts and this will be reviewed further.

Mouse studies have clearly shown that there is in vivo osteoprotective activity associated with the TSHR itself even when pituitary TSH is suppressed by excessive thyroid hormone (11). These data indicate that either the intrinsic, constitutive, activity of the TSHR itself is able to provide the protection in the absence of TSH ligand or raised the possibility of a local TSHR stimulator being available to maintain TSHR signaling in the absence of pituitary TSH. This possibility prompted us to search for other isoform (s) of the TSH molecule in bone.

A Novel TSH-β Subunit Variant in Pituitary and Bone Marrow

In fact, extrapituitary sources of TSH have long been known (22, 23). Hence, parallel to the pituitary-thyroid endocrine circuit, there are additional TSH-related circuits that function beyond the thyroid and involves the immune system as evidenced by reports, which shows that immune cells are capable of producing TSH (22) and a novel TSH-βv is produced within the bone marrow cells; primarily by macrophages (24).

In the mouse (Figure 2A), unlike the human (Figure 2B), the TSH-β coding region is located in segments of exons 4 and 5. In the novel mouse, TSH-β splice variant (TSH-βv) exon 4 is missing. The human TSH gene contains three exonic sequences but exon-2 is missing in the hTSH-βv. Molecular docking and experimental studies suggested that TSH-β and TSH-βv were able to bind and signal through the TSHR (2, 3). Further, molecular docking studies have also shown that the binding affinity of TSH-βv is comparable to the native TSH-β subunit (2). Of direct relevance here is that it has been shown that the mouse pituitary in addition to macrophages is also a source of this novel TSH-β splice variant (TSH-βv), which may retain its biological effect (24).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. (A) A schematic comparison of the mouse native TSH-β and novel TSH-βv. Of note is a missing exon IV in the splice variant resulting in a smaller peptide of 8 vs 17 kDa for the full length. The intronic region is marked in black. Copyright (2013) Endocrinology and reproduced with permission from Oxford University Press (2). (B) A similar schematic outlining the human native TSH-β and novel TSH-βv gene arrangement [adapted from Baliram et al. (3)]. Copyright (2013) Endocrinology and reproduced with permission from Oxford University Press (2).

In the human, TSH-β is similarly expressed primarily in the thyrotrophs of the anterior pituitary gland. But we and others have also observed, as in the mouse, that a TSH-βv is expressed in human pituitary, human bone marrow, and in human peripheral blood-derived macrophages (3, 24). These data further support the concept of an extrapituitary TSH-like molecule, which can bind to TSHRs on osteoblasts and osteoclasts to initiate proliferation and differentiation. However, the full significance of this conclusion in bone biology needs to be further elucidated.

TSHR and Small Molecule Agonists

In recent years, small molecules have gained momentum as therapeutic options for modulating TSHR signaling (25). In addition to their low cost of manufacturing, these molecules have the biological advantage of easily crossing the plasma membrane and binding to allosteric sites on the receptor. Their chemical nature renders them resistant to proteolytic enzymes and thus ideal therapeutic agents. A few potent small molecule agonists to the TSHR have been reported (2628). These molecules interact with the TSHR on distinct polar and non-polar residues within the hydrophobic pockets created by the helices of the receptor transmembrane domains, thereby exerting a stimulatory effect by altering the interaction and movement of these helices (29, 30). Our laboratory has reported a small molecule (MS-438) (28), which appears to increase osteoblast formation through the PKA signaling pathway (Figure 3). Other studies have also shown biological action of small molecules on bone cells overexpressing the TSHR (31) and two small molecule TSHR antagonists have been reported but with lower affinity than likely to be clinically useful (27, 32).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Small molecule MS 438 enhanced collagen gene expression in human osteoblast cells. The hFOB 1.19 cells were transformed into osteoblasts by treating with osteogenic stimulation/differentiation factors—20 μm of beta-glycerophosphate, 50 μg/ml of ascorbic acid, and 10−7M dexamethasone in refreshed media every 3 days along with or without 10 μM of MS 438 and 10 μM of PKA inhibitor (H 89). On day 10, cultures were terminated and gene expression analyzed by quantitative PCR and showed enhanced collagen gene expression.

TSHR Gene Expression

The human TSHR gene, cloned in 1989 (19, 20), is on chromosome #14q-31 and codes for a seven transmembrane, G-protein-coupled receptor. The TSHR is the largest of the glycoprotein receptor because of its 8- and 50 amino acid insertions into the ectodomain (residues 38–45 and 317–367). The TSHR is described as a G protein-coupled receptor with both Gαs and Gαq as primary effectors and with constitutive activity, which is enhanced further by TSH or by stimulating TSHR autoantibodies (33). The minimal 5′ promoter is necessary to confer thyroid-specific expression and cAMP autoregulation (34). It is well established that in addition to the Gαs cAMP/protein kinase A/ERK signaling cascade, TSH activates Gαq-AKT/protein kinase C/Ca 2+ coupled signaling networks predominantly at high concentrations (35). Although the TSHR is important for growth and function of the thyroid gland, as discussed earlier, it has a diverse expression profile including on lymphocytes, macrophages, adipose tissue, fibroblasts, heart, and bone among others (21).

TSH Effects on Osteoblasts

Osteoblast-related cells such as bone lining cells, stromal cells, preosteoblasts osteoprogenitors, osteoblasts, and osteocytes are differentiated from mesenchymal cells. These cells can also terminally differentiate into fibroblasts, chondrocytes, myoblasts, and adipocytes (36). Osteoblast lineage cells perform varied functions, which include support for muscle attachment and lend itself as a reservoir for minerals such as phosphorus and calcium. Additionally, osteocytes derived from osteoblast lineage cells produce FGF 23 (37). Osteoblast lineage cells contribute to the bone marrow niche (38) and are also involved in insulin action (39, 40).

Osteoblast formation requires a series of sequential steps starting from precursor cell commitment, then cell proliferation and then cell differentiation, which is marked by type-1 collagen formation and matrix deposition. Once bone is formed, osteoblasts then go onto differentiate into osteocytes (41). Expression of the TSHR in the rat osteoblast line UMR106 cells was first demonstrated (42). Then in subsequent studies, the TSHR mRNA expression and protein were observed in normal osteoblasts (4349).

Thyroid-stimulating hormone was found to induce genes involved in the regulation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells within the bone marrow (50) and treatment of osteoblasts with TSH in vitro has been shown in most studies to have stimulatory effects on osteoblast differentiation and function (31, 46, 47). Inhibition of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 mRNA by TSH suggested a role for TSH on osteoblastogenesis. TSH has since been shown to activate Wnt-5a signaling in osteoblast differentiation (47). Similarly, in embryonic stem cell cultures, TSH-stimulated osteoblast differentiation via protein kinase C and the non-canonical Wnt-5a pathway (47). Further, TSH also stimulated proliferation and differentiation, as shown by an upregulation in alkaline phosphatase and in increase in IGF-1 and IGF-2 mRNA expressions (51). Recently, TSH was shown to stimulate arrestin 1, which leads to the activation of intracellular signaling molecules such as ERK, P38 MAPK, and AKT (31).

TSH Effects on Osteoclasts

Osteoclasts are terminally differentiated polykaryons, which reabsorb bone matrix and mineral. They attach to bone through αVβ3 integrin that interacts with bone matrix proteins. These interactions form cytoplasmic extensions with finger-like processes known as the ruffled border. These borders function to increase the surface area when contacting bone and through them, osteoclasts secrete hydrochloric acid from acidic vacuoles. The acid dissolves bone mineral and also activates acid hydrolases, such as cathepsin K in degrading the matrix (52, 53).

Osteoclasts differentiate through the commitment of hematopoietic stem cells to the myeloid lineage and are regulated by PU.1 together with micro-ophthalmia-associated transcription factors (54). Also, macrophage CSF/CSF-1R stimulates expression of RANK and leads to osteoclast precursor commitment. Furthermore, RANK Ligand (RANKL) is essential for osteoclast formation, function, and survival (52). Moreover, RANKL/RANK signaling induces the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and nuclear factor of activated T cells cytoplasmic 1, which leads to osteoclast differentiation (55).

Recent studies have demonstrated that TSH reduces osteoclastogenesis by acting on their TSHR G-protein-coupled receptor (43, 56, 57). In animal studies, mice which lack the TSHR exhibited osteoporosis because of enhanced osteoclast formation (43). TNFα, which is a member of the tumor necrosis family, is a well-established signal that increases osteoclasts (58). The receptor activator for NFκB ligand (RANKL) stimulates endogenous TNFα expression and it is necessary for osteoclast formation. Additionally, RANKL and a mixture with IL1 and TNFα increase osteoclastogenesis (59). Moreover, we showed that the TSHR null mice exhibit an elevated TNFα expression in osteoclast progenitors. The fact that these mice develop osteoporosis (43) suggests that TNFα overproduction may play a major role in the development of this condition since TSH has been shown to directly downregulate TNFα transcription induced by IL1 or RANKL treatments (59).

TSH Effects on Osteocytes

In contrast to osteoblasts and osteoclasts, osteocytes make up 90–95% of bone cells and are embedded in bone matrix for decades. Osteocytes have been increasingly recognized as the major orchestrator of bone activity, particularly considering the fact that they secrete a 190-amino-acid glycoprotein, which decreases bone formation by inhibiting terminal osteoblast differentiation while promoting apoptosis. These cells also regulate osteoblast physiology by controlling osteoblast and osteoclast activity during bone remodeling. Terminally differentiated osteoblasts are widely described as mature osteocytes.

However, it is poorly understood how osteoblast becomes embedded in bone matrix to begin a new life in the capacity as an osteocyte and also the molecular and genetic mechanisms, which regulate the differentiation and maturation of the osteocyte are also poorly understood (60).

Osteocytes takes up residence in lacunae within mineralized matrix and protrude their dendritic processes through the canaliculi to form a network, which connects with cells on the bone surface and to blood vessels (61).

Localized conditions such as mechanical stresses and microdamage stimulate osteocytes to release cytokines, chemotactic signals, or to induce apoptosis. An, increase in mechanical stress stimulates local bone formation through osteoblast activity, whereas reduced microdamage results in bone resorption induced by osteoclast activity (60, 62, 63). These mechanosensor capabilities of osteocytes allow them to control bone remodeling through their regulation of osteoclasts and osteoblasts via the RANKL/RANK pathway and modulation of Wnt signaling (60, 64). The effects of TSH on osteocytes have not been studied.

Skeletal Consequences in the TSHR Knockout Mouse

The use of animal models in the study of TSH effects on bone has provided important fundamental advances. Animal models of hypothyroid mice such as the Snell Dwarf mouse (65), the cog mouse (66), and the hyt/hyt mouse (67, 68) have all retained the TSHR expression and ligand-independent constitutive signals transmitted by the TSHR (69). In contrast, the generation of the TSHR-KO mouse, brought a novel way of studying TSH signaling and this implicated the TSHR in bone biology (11, 43, 70). In this mouse, exon-1 of the TSHR gene was replaced with a green fluorescent protein (GFP) cassette. The heterozygotes, haplo-insufficient in the TSHR, were euthyroid and exhibit normal growth and normal thyroid hormone and TSH levels. By contrast, the homozygotes (TSHR-KO mice) showed runted growth, low thyroid hormone levels, and very high TSH levels and required thyroid hormone replacement for normal growth and survival. Nevertheless, these mice had a smaller thyroid gland in the correct position. An examination of the TSHR-KO thyroid follicles (Figure 4) showed GFP expression in the heterozygote and homozygote thyroid follicles indicating that the TSHR had been deleted but the thyroid follicles, while appearing normal in the heterozygous, were few and small in the homozygous and their pattern was disorganized. Hence, the TSHR-KO mice showed congenital hypothyroidism with undetectable thyroid hormones and a rise in serum TSH.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Histologic staining of the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR)-KO mouse thyroid gland. Hematoxylin/eosin stained sections of WT (A,C) and TSHR-KO (B,D) thyroids. Fluorescent imaging of heterozygous (E) and TSHR-KO (F) green fluorescent protein reporter gene expression in the thyroid. Scanning electron micrographs for WT (G) and TSHR-KO (H) thyroid follicles [magnification: (A,B) 100; (C–F) 400; (G,H) 1,500]. Note the small but present thyroid cells in the TSHR-KO mouse, which has been used in a number of studies elucidating thyroid-stimulating hormone actions on bone. Copyright (2002) National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A (71).

Untreated TSHR-KO mice were found to have a low bone mineral density (BMD), increase bone formation, and resorption. However, even when these mice were given thyroid hormone replacement, they displayed a reduction in BMD and reduced calvarial thickness (43). Heterozygotes showed a smaller reduction in BMD, affecting only some parts of the skeleton. There were no change in calvarial thickness, and no difference in bone resorption or formation. These data indicated that TSH signaling must suppress bone loss and TSH was, therefore, proposed as an activator of bone formation and inhibitor of bone resorption (43). Because the TSHR-KO mice are only thyroid supplemented from weaning (around 21 days of age) (43), they do remain severely hypothyroid during a critical time of skeletal development but clearly are unable to catch up.

TSH Effects on Normal Rodent Skeleton

The osteoporosis due to TSHR deficiency in the TSHR/KO mouse is of the high-turnover variety. Further, when TSH was intermittently administered into ovariectomized rats, it displayed a robust in vivo antiresorptive action (46, 72). TSH increased bone volume, trabecular number, trabecular thickness, and decreased trabecular separation (46). TSH also decreased osteoclast numbers in these rats (46) suggesting that TSH treatment is capable of restoring ovariectomy-induced bone loss and bone strength (72). The inhibitory action of TSH on osteoclast even persisted after therapy halted (72). This lasting antiresorptive action of TSH was mimicked in cells that genetically overexpressed a constitutively active ligand-independent TSHR (73). Additionally, due to a loss of function in congenital mutant TSHR congenital hypothyroid mice, osteoclast differentiation is activated, thus confirming that TSHR signaling has a pivotal role in the regulation of bone remodeling (72).

TSH Effects on the Human Skeleton

As discussed earlier, new lines of evidence have shown the influence of pituitary hormones on the skeleton (43, 72, 74, 75). For example, suppressed hyperthyroid levels of TSH are well known to correlate with low BMD (76), especially in postmenopausal women, and even low normal TSH levels show the same relationship in the elderly (77) and an increased risk of hip fractures in euthyroid women (77). These studies also show that duration of TSH suppression was also a predictor of major osteoporotic fractures. However, others (78) could not distinguish the separate pharmacological effects of thyroid hormones and TSH on bone turnover, although TSH was correlated inversely with markers indicative of bone turnover and is unrelated to thyroid hormones.

For humans, few large data sets exist on the physiologic effects of TSH on bone in. However, recombinant human TSH administration regulated C-telopeptides type-1 collagen levels and alkaline phosphatase with no effect on levels of osteoprotegerin (79) or on the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand levels (80).

T3 Effects on the Skeleton

Thyroid hormone levels have a major influence on bone homeostasis (81), and this has been well reviewed elsewhere (5). Investigators have focused on the direct effects of the active thyroid hormone (T3), on bone cells, via the thyroid hormone receptor family that induces transcription in a ligand-dependent manner (82). Osteoblasts express thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) (TRα1, TRα2, and TRβ1) and respond to T3 with increased proliferation and expression of lineage-specific markers such as alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and collagen. Interestingly, although osteoclasts have TRs, their response to T3 appears to be mediated mostly by osteoblasts since T3 induces osteoblasts to express RANKL, the key osteoclastogenic cytokine. Additionally, mice lacking the known active isoforms of TRs have retarded bone growth and maturation, but do not manifest increased BMD, as would be predicted if T3 was an important stimulus of bone resorption in the euthyroid state (83). Further, T4, the prohormone of T3, suppressed pituitary TSH release but enhanced bone marrow TSHβv expression (3) (Figures 5A,B) indicating an attempt at osteoprotection. Hence, our observation of enhanced bone loss induced by T4 when the TSHR is absent fits with these correlative data (11).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. (A) Thyroid hormone regulation of mouse thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)-βv in bone marrow cells. Here, bone marrow cells from mouse WT mice subcutaneously treated with T4 hormone pellets for 21 days showed greatly increased TSH-βv gene expression. Copyright (2016) Endocrinology and reproduced with permission from Oxford University Press (3). (B) Thyroid hormone regulation of mouse TSH-βv in the pituitary. The pituitary tissue from WT mice administered subcutaneous T4 pellets for 21 days showed suppression of both wild-type TSH-β and TSH-βv. This is in contrast to the bone marrow cells shown in (B). Copyright (2016) Endocrinology and reproduced with permission from Oxford University Press (3).

Summary and Conclusion

Thyroid-stimulating hormone, TSH-β, and TSH-βv are produced through central neural circuits in the pituitary thyrotrophs and are negatively regulated by T3 produced by the thyroid gland. However, in the local peripheral immune circuit, only TSH-βv is produced by bone marrow macrophages and appears to be positively regulated by T3. It has been shown that intact TSH exerts anabolic and osteoprotective effects on bone by stimulating osteoblast differentiation and by inhibiting osteoclast formation and survival. Since the TSHR is widely distributed in bone cells, the production of TSH-βv by macrophages argues for a local TSH-TSHR circuit regulating bone physiology. Evidence for the importance of such influences is shown by the greater T4-induced bone loss in the absence of TSHR signaling (Figure 6).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Schematic showing a collaborative effort among pituitary, thyroid, and macrophages in the local bone marrow microenvironment in regulating osteoclast and osteoblast activity through the release of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)-β and TSH-βv. SM 438 is a small molecule agonist at the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor. Solid dark arrows indicate modulatory effects of TSH-β, TSH-βv, and SM 438 on bone cells and the broken arrows indicate that such effects still need to be mapped.

Author Contributions

RB, RL, MZ, and TF contributed to the design, figures, and writing of this manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

TD is on the Board of Kronus Inc., Star, ID, USA. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

The reviewer IR and handling editor declared their shared affiliation.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the support of Drs. Risheng Ma and Syed Morshed in the Davies Laboratory and Drs. Sun Li and Tony Yuen in the Zaidi laboratory.

Funding

This study was supported by NIH grants: DK069713 and Veterans Affairs Merit Award.

References

1. Guntur AR, Rosen CJ. Bone as an endocrine organ. Endocr Pract (2012) 18:758–62. doi:10.4158/EP12141.RA

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Baliram R, Chow A, Huber AK, Collier L, Ali MR, Morshed SA, et al. Thyroid and bone: macrophage-derived TSH-beta splice variant increases murine osteoblastogenesis. Endocrinology (2013) 154:4919–26. doi:10.1210/en.2012-2234

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Baliram R, Latif R, Morshed SA, Zaidi M, Davies TF. T3 regulates a human macrophage-derived TSH-beta splice variant: implications for human bone biology. Endocrinology (2016) 157:3658–67. doi:10.1210/en.2015-1974

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Vincent BH, Montufar-Solis D, Teng BB, Amendt BA, Schaefer J, Klein JR. Bone marrow cells produce a novel TSHbeta splice variant that is upregulated in the thyroid following systemic virus infection. Genes Immun (2009) 10:18–26. doi:10.1038/gene.2008.69

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bassett JH, Williams GR. Role of thyroid hormones in skeletal development and bone maintenance. Endocr Rev (2016) 37:135–87. doi:10.1210/er.2015-1106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. De Menis E, Da Rin G, Roiter I, Legovini P, Foscolo G, Conte N. Bone turnover in overt and subclinical hyperthyroidism due to autonomous thyroid adenoma. Horm Res (1992) 37:217–20. doi:10.1159/000182315

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kisakol G, Kaya A, Gonen S, Tunc R. Bone and calcium metabolism in subclinical autoimmune hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. Endocr J (2003) 50:657–61. doi:10.1507/endocrj.50.657

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Foldes J, Tarjan G, Szathmari M, Varga F, Krasznai I, Horvath C. Bone mineral density in patients with endogenous subclinical hyperthyroidism: is this thyroid status a risk factor for osteoporosis? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) (1993) 39:521–7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.1993.tb02403.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Gurlek A, Gedik O. Effect of endogenous subclinical hyperthyroidism on bone metabolism and bone mineral density in premenopausal women. Thyroid (1999) 9:539–43. doi:10.1089/thy.1999.9.539

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Weeke J, Mosekilde L. Fracture risk in patients treated for hyperthyroidism. Thyroid (2000) 10:341–8. doi:10.1089/thy.2000.10.341

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Baliram R, Sun L, Cao J, Li J, Latif R, Huber AK, et al. Hyperthyroid-associated osteoporosis is exacerbated by the loss of TSH signaling. J Clin Invest (2012) 122:3737–41. doi:10.1172/JCI63948

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Boler J, Enzmann F, Folkers K, Bowers CY, Schally AV. The identity of chemical and hormonal properties of the thyrotropin releasing hormone and pyroglutamyl-histidyl-proline amide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (1969) 37:705–10. doi:10.1016/0006-291X(69)90868-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Burgus R, Dunn TF, Desiderio D, Guillemin R. [Molecular structure of the hypothalamic hypophysiotropic TRF factor of ovine origin: mass spectrometry demonstration of the PCA-His-Pro-NH2 sequence]. C R Acad Sci Hebd Seances Acad Sci D (1969) 269:1870–3.

Google Scholar

14. Hashimoto K, Zanger K, Hollenberg AN, Cohen LE, Radovick S, Wondisford FE. cAMP response element-binding protein-binding protein mediates thyrotropin-releasing hormone signaling on thyrotropin subunit genes. J Biol Chem (2000) 275:33365–72. doi:10.1074/jbc.M006819200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Bianco AC, Kim BW. Deiodinases: implications of the local control of thyroid hormone action. J Clin Invest (2006) 116:2571–9. doi:10.1172/JCI29812

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Szkudlinski MW, Fremont V, Ronin C, Weintraub BD. Thyroid-stimulating hormone and thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor structure-function relationships. Physiol Rev (2002) 82:473–502. doi:10.1152/physrev.00031.2001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Gordon DF, Wood WM, Ridgway EC. Organization and nucleotide sequence of the gene encoding the beta-subunit of murine thyrotropin. DNA (1988) 7:17–26. doi:10.1089/dna.1988.7.17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Shupnik MA, Ridgway EC, Chin WW. Molecular biology of thyrotropin. Endocr Rev (1989) 10:459–75. doi:10.1210/edrv-10-4-459

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Vassart G, Dumont JE. The thyrotropin receptor and the regulation of thyrocyte function and growth. Endocr Rev (1992) 13:596–611. doi:10.1210/edrv-13-3-596

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Nagayama Y, Kaufman KD, Seto P, Rapoport B. Molecular cloning, sequence and functional expression of the cDNA for the human thyrotropin receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (1989) 165:1184–90. doi:10.1016/0006-291X(89)92727-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Davies T, Marians R, Latif R. The TSH receptor reveals itself. J Clin Invest (2002) 110:161–4. doi:10.1172/JCI0216234

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Blalock JE. The immune system as the sixth sense. J Intern Med (2005) 257:126–38. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01441.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Smith EM, Phan M, Kruger TE, Coppenhaver DH, Blalock JE. Human lymphocyte production of immunoreactive thyrotropin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1983) 80:6010–3. doi:10.1073/pnas.80.19.6010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Schaefer JS, Klein JR. A novel thyroid stimulating hormone beta-subunit isoform in human pituitary, peripheral blood leukocytes, and thyroid. Gen Comp Endocrinol (2009) 162:241–4. doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.04.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Davies TF, Latif R. Targeting the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor with small molecule ligands and antibodies. Expert Opin Ther Targets (2015) 19:835–47. doi:10.1517/14728222.2015.1018181

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Jaschke H, Neumann S, Moore S, Thomas CJ, Colson AO, Costanzi S, et al. A low molecular weight agonist signals by binding to the transmembrane domain of thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) and luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor (LHCGR). J Biol Chem (2006) 281:9841–4. doi:10.1074/jbc.C600014200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Neumann S, Huang W, Titus S, Krause G, Kleinau G, Alberobello AT, et al. Small-molecule agonists for the thyrotropin receptor stimulate thyroid function in human thyrocytes and mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2009) 106:12471–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.0904506106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Latif R, Ali MR, Ma R, David M, Morshed SA, Ohlmeyer M, et al. New small molecule agonists to the thyrotropin receptor. Thyroid (2015) 25:51–62. doi:10.1089/thy.2014.0119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Kleinau G, Haas AK, Neumann S, Worth CL, Hoyer I, Furkert J, et al. Signaling-sensitive amino acids surround the allosteric ligand binding site of the thyrotropin receptor. FASEB J (2010) 24:2347–54. doi:10.1096/fj.09-149146

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Cantley AM, Welsch M, Ambesi-Impiombato A, Sanchez-Martin M, Kim MY, Bauer A, et al. Small molecule that reverses dexamethasone resistance in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). ACS Med Chem Lett (2014) 5:754–9. doi:10.1021/ml500044g

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Boutin A, Eliseeva E, Gershengorn MC, Neumann S. beta-Arrestin-1 mediates thyrotropin-enhanced osteoblast differentiation. FASEB J (2014) 28:3446–55. doi:10.1096/fj.14-251124

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Latif R, Realubit RB, Karan C, Mezei M, Davies TF. TSH receptor signaling abrogation by a novel small molecule. Front Endocrinol (2016) 7:130. doi:10.3389/fendo.2016.00130

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Latif R, Morshed SA, Zaidi M, Davies TF. The thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor: impact of thyroid-stimulating hormone and thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibodies on multimerization, cleavage, and signaling. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am (2009) 38:319–41, viii. doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2009.01.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Ikuyama S, Niller HH, Shimura H, Akamizu T, Kohn LD. Characterization of the 5’-flanking region of the rat thyrotropin receptor gene. Mol Endocrinol (1992) 6:793–804. doi:10.1210/mend.6.5.1318504

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Morshed SA, Latif R, Davies TF. Characterization of thyrotropin receptor antibody-induced signaling cascades. Endocrinology (2009) 150:519–29. doi:10.1210/en.2008-0878

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Matsuo K, Irie N. Osteoclast-osteoblast communication. Arch Biochem Biophys (2008) 473:201–9. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2008.03.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Razzaque MS. The FGF23-Klotho axis: endocrine regulation of phosphate homeostasis. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2009) 5:611–9. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2009.196

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Long F. Building strong bones: molecular regulation of the osteoblast lineage. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2011) 13:27–38. doi:10.1038/nrm3254

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Ferron M, Wei J, Yoshizawa T, Del Fattore A, DePinho RA, Teti A, et al. Insulin signaling in osteoblasts integrates bone remodeling and energy metabolism. Cell (2010) 142:296–308. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Fulzele K, Riddle RC, DiGirolamo DJ, Cao X, Wan C, Chen D, et al. Insulin receptor signaling in osteoblasts regulates postnatal bone acquisition and body composition. Cell (2010) 142:309–19. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Martin TJ, Sims NA, Ng KW. Regulatory pathways revealing new approaches to the development of anabolic drugs for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int (2008) 19:1125–38. doi:10.1007/s00198-008-0575-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Inoue M, Tawata M, Yokomori N, Endo T, Onaya T. Expression of thyrotropin receptor on clonal osteoblast-like rat osteosarcoma cells. Thyroid (1998) 8:1059–64. doi:10.1089/thy.1998.8.1059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Abe E, Marians RC, Yu W, Wu XB, Ando T, Li Y, et al. TSH is a negative regulator of skeletal remodeling. Cell (2003) 115:151–62. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00771-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Bassett JH, Williams AJ, Murphy E, Boyde A, Howell PG, Swinhoe R, et al. A lack of thyroid hormones rather than excess thyrotropin causes abnormal skeletal development in hypothyroidism. Mol Endocrinol (2008) 22:501–12. doi:10.1210/me.2007-0221

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Bassett JH, van der Spek A, Logan JG, Gogakos A, Bagchi-Chakraborty J, Murphy E, et al. Thyrostimulin regulates osteoblastic bone formation during early skeletal development. Endocrinology (2015) 156:3098–113. doi:10.1210/en.2014-1943

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Sampath TK, Simic P, Sendak R, Draca N, Bowe AE, O’Brien S, et al. Thyroid-stimulating hormone restores bone volume, microarchitecture, and strength in aged ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Res (2007) 22:849–59. doi:10.1359/jbmr.070302

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Baliram R, Latif R, Berkowitz J, Frid S, Colaianni G, Sun L, et al. Thyroid-stimulating hormone induces a Wnt-dependent, feed-forward loop for osteoblastogenesis in embryonic stem cell cultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2011) 108:16277–82. doi:10.1073/pnas.1110286108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Tsai JA, Janson A, Bucht E, Kindmark H, Marcus C, Stark A, et al. Weak evidence of thyrotropin receptors in primary cultures of human osteoblast-like cells. Calcif Tissue Int (2004) 74:486–91. doi:10.1007/s00223-003-0108-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Morimura T, Tsunekawa K, Kasahara T, Seki K, Ogiwara T, Mori M, et al. Expression of type 2 iodothyronine deiodinase in human osteoblast is stimulated by thyrotropin. Endocrinology (2005) 146:2077–84. doi:10.1210/en.2004-1432

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Bagriacik EU, Yaman M, Haznedar R, Sucak G, Delibasi T. TSH-induced gene expression involves regulation of self-renewal and differentiation-related genes in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Endocrinol (2012) 212:169–78. doi:10.1530/JOE-11-0404

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Ramajayam G, Vignesh RC, Karthikeyan S, Kumar KS, Karthikeyan GD, Veni S, et al. Regulation of insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins by thyroid stimulating hormone in human osteoblast-like (SaOS2) cells. Mol Cell Biochem (2012) 368:77–88. doi:10.1007/s11010-012-1345-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Boyce BF, Xing L. Osteoclasts, no longer osteoblast slaves. Nat Med (2006) 12:1356–8. doi:10.1038/nm1206-1356

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Teitelbaum SL. Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science (2000) 289:1504–8. doi:10.1126/science.289.5484.1504

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Soysa NS, Alles N, Aoki K, Ohya K. Osteoclast formation and differentiation: an overview. J Med Dent Sci (2012) 59:65–74.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

55. Abu-Amer Y. NF-kappaB signaling and bone resorption. Osteoporos Int (2013) 24:2377–86. doi:10.1007/s00198-013-2313-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Ma R, Morshed S, Latif R, Zaidi M, Davies TF. The influence of thyroid-stimulating hormone and thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibodies on osteoclastogenesis. Thyroid (2011) 21:897–906. doi:10.1089/thy.2010.0457

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Zhang W, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wang J, Gao L, Yu C, et al. Thyroid-stimulating hormone maintains bone mass and strength by suppressing osteoclast differentiation. J Biomech (2014) 47:1307–14. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.02.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Lam J, Takeshita S, Barker JE, Kanagawa O, Ross FP, Teitelbaum SL. TNF-alpha induces osteoclastogenesis by direct stimulation of macrophages exposed to permissive levels of RANK ligand. J Clin Invest (2000) 106:1481–8. doi:10.1172/JCI11176

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Yamoah K, Brebene A, Baliram R, Inagaki K, Dolios G, Arabi A, et al. High-mobility group box proteins modulate tumor necrosis factor-alpha expression in osteoclastogenesis via a novel deoxyribonucleic acid sequence. Mol Endocrinol (2008) 22:1141–53. doi:10.1210/me.2007-0460

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Dallas SL, Prideaux M, Bonewald LF. The osteocyte: an endocrine cell … and more. Endocr Rev (2013) 34:658–90. doi:10.1210/er.2012-1026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Bonewald LF, Johnson ML. Osteocytes, mechanosensing and Wnt signaling. Bone (2008) 42:606–15. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2007.12.224

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Seeman E, Delmas PD. Bone quality – the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N Engl J Med (2006) 354:2250–61. doi:10.1056/NEJMra053077

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Han Y, Cowin SC, Schaffler MB, Weinbaum S. Mechanotransduction and strain amplification in osteocyte cell processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2004) 101:16689–94. doi:10.1073/pnas.0407429101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Nakashima T, Hayashi M, Fukunaga T, Kurata K, Oh-Hora M, Feng JQ, et al. Evidence for osteocyte regulation of bone homeostasis through RANKL expression. Nat Med (2011) 17:1231–4. doi:10.1038/nm.2452

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Cordier AC, Denef JF, Haumont SM. Thyroid gland in dwarf mice: a stereological study. Cell Tissue Res (1976) 171:449–57. doi:10.1007/BF00220237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Taylor BA, Rowe L. The congenital goiter mutation is linked to the thyroglobulin gene in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1987) 84:1986–90. doi:10.1073/pnas.84.7.1986

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Beamer WG, Cresswell LA. Defective thyroid ontogenesis in fetal hypothyroid (hyt/hyt) mice. Anat Rec (1982) 202:387–93. doi:10.1002/ar.1092020311

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Stein SA, Oates EL, Hall CR, Grumbles RM, Fernandez LM, Taylor NA, et al. Identification of a point mutation in the thyrotropin receptor of the hyt/hyt hypothyroid mouse. Mol Endocrinol (1994) 8:129–38. doi:10.1210/mend.8.2.8170469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Zhang M, Tong KP, Fremont V, Chen J, Narayan P, Puett D, et al. The extracellular domain suppresses constitutive activity of the transmembrane domain of the human TSH receptor: implications for hormone-receptor interaction and antagonist design. Endocrinology (2000) 141:3514–7. doi:10.1210/endo.141.9.7790

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Sun L, Zhu LL, Lu P, Yuen T, Li J, Ma R, et al. Genetic confirmation for a central role for TNFalpha in the direct action of thyroid stimulating hormone on the skeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2013) 110:9891–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.1308336110

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Marians RC, Ng L, Blair HC, Unger P, Graves PN, Davies TF. Defining thyrotropin-dependent and -independent steps of thyroid hormone synthesis by using thyrotropin receptor-null mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2002) 99:15776–81.

Google Scholar

72. Sun L, Vukicevic S, Baliram R, Yang G, Sendak R, McPherson J, et al.. Intermittent recombinant TSH injections prevent ovariectomy-induced bone loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2008) 105:4289–94. doi:10.1073/pnas.0712395105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Hase H, Ando T, Eldeiry L, Brebene A, Peng Y, Liu L, et al. TNFalpha mediates the skeletal effects of thyroid-stimulating hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2006) 103:12849–54. doi:10.1073/pnas.0600427103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Sun L, Davies TF, Blair HC, Abe E, Zaidi M. TSH and bone loss. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2006) 1068:309–18. doi:10.1196/annals.1346.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Zaidi M, Sun L, Davies TF, Abe E. Low TSH triggers bone loss: fact or fiction? Thyroid (2006) 16:1075–6. doi:10.1089/thy.2006.16.1075

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Svare A, Nilsen TI, Bjoro T, Forsmo S, Schei B, Langhammer A. Hyperthyroid levels of TSH correlate with low bone mineral density: the HUNT 2 study. Eur J Endocrinol (2009) 161:779–86. doi:10.1530/EJE-09-0139

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Leader A, Ayzenfeld RH, Lishner M, Cohen E, Segev D, Hermoni D. Thyrotropin levels within the lower normal range are associated with an increased risk of hip fractures in euthyroid women, but not men, over the age of 65 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2014) 99:2665–73. doi:10.1210/jc.2013-2474

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Heemstra KA, van der Deure WM, Peeters RP, Hamdy NA, Stokkel MP, Corssmit EP, et al. Thyroid hormone independent associations between serum TSH levels and indicators of bone turnover in cured patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Endocrinol (2008) 159:69–76. doi:10.1530/EJE-08-0038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Mazziotti G, Sorvillo F, Piscopo M, Cioffi M, Pilla P, Biondi B, et al. Recombinant human TSH modulates in vivo C-telopeptides of type-1 collagen and bone alkaline phosphatase, but not osteoprotegerin production in postmenopausal women monitored for differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Bone Miner Res (2005) 20:480–6. doi:10.1359/JBMR.041126

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Giusti M, Cecoli F, Ghiara C, Rubinacci A, Villa I, Cavallero D, et al. Recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone does not acutely change serum osteoprotegerin and soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaBeta ligand in patients under evaluation for differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Hormones (Athens) (2007) 6:304–13. doi:10.14310/horm.2002.1111026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. van der Deure WM, Uitterlinden AG, Hofman A, Rivadeneira F, Pols HA, Peeters RP, et al. Effects of serum TSH and FT4 levels and the TSHR-Asp727Glu polymorphism on bone: the Rotterdam Study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) (2008) 68:175–81. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.03016.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Britto JM, Fenton AJ, Holloway WR, Nicholson GC. Osteoblasts mediate thyroid hormone stimulation of osteoclastic bone resorption. Endocrinology (1994) 134:169–76. doi:10.1210/endo.134.1.8275930

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Gothe S, Wang Z, Ng L, Kindblom JM, Barros AC, Ohlsson C, et al. Mice devoid of all known thyroid hormone receptors are viable but exhibit disorders of the pituitary-thyroid axis, growth, and bone maturation. Genes Dev (1999) 13:1329–41. doi:10.1101/gad.13.10.1329

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: TSH-β, TSH-βv, TSH-receptor, macrophage, osteoblast, osteoclast

Citation: Baliram R, Latif R, Zaidi M and Davies TF (2017) Expanding the Role of Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone in Skeletal Physiology. Front. Endocrinol. 8:252. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00252

Received: 28 June 2017; Accepted: 13 September 2017;
Published: 03 October 2017

Edited by:

Alessandro Antonelli, University of Pisa, Italy

Reviewed by:

Marco Centanni, Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy
Ilaria Ruffilli, University of Pisa, Italy

Copyright: © 2017 Baliram, Latif, Zaidi and Davies. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ramkumarie Baliram, YW5uaWUuYmFsaXJhbSYjeDAwMDQwO21zc20uZWR1

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.