Ghrelin-Reactive Immunoglobulins in Conditions of Altered Appetite and Energy Balance

Part of circulating ghrelin is bound to immunoglobulins (Ig) protecting it from degradation and preserving its functional activity. This review summarizes the data on ghrelin- and desacyl-ghrelin-reactive IgG in conditions of altered appetite and energy balance. Plasma levels and affinity kinetics of such IgG were compared in patients with obesity and anorexia nervosa (AN) and in animal models of obesity including ob/ob mice, high-fat diet-induced obese mice, and obese Zucker rats as well as in mice after chronic food restriction and activity-based anorexia and in rats with methotrexate-induced anorexia. We show that plasmatic IgG in both obese humans and animals are characterized by increased affinity for ghrelin. In contrast, patients with AN and anorectic rodents all show lower affinity of ghrelin- and desacyl-ghrelin-reactive IgG, respectively, the changes which were not observed in non-anorectic, chronically starved mice. We also show that affinity of ghrelin-reactive IgG correlate with plasma levels of ghrelin. These data point to common mechanisms underlying modifications of affinity kinetics properties of ghrelin-reactive IgG during chronic alterations of energy balance in humans and rodents and support a functional role of such autoantibodies in ghrelin-mediated regulation of appetite.

Introduction

Ghrelin is a 28 amino acid acylated enteroendocrine peptide produced mainly in the stomach, which has been isolated and named based on its ability to stimulate growth hormone secretion (1). One of the main properties of ghrelin, independent from growth hormone secretagogue activity, is stimulation of feeding and body weight gain (2–4). Importantly, acylation of the serine 3 residue in the ghrelin’s N-terminal by octanoic acid is necessary for binding of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1 (GHSR1), designated as ghrelin receptor (5) and biological activity including stimulation of food intake (6–8). However, the active, acylated form of ghrelin is unstable in the circulation and is degraded to desacyl-ghrelin (9, 10). The half-life pharmacokinetics properties of acyl-ghrelin in human plasma are about 10 min (11). The preservation of the acylated ghrelin form in the circulation appears, hence, as a key factor for maintaining its role in regulation of appetite and energy balance. Several mechanisms are involved in the regulation of ghrelin signaling during its production and receptor activation, which can be exploited for development of ghrelin-based therapy of altered appetite (12). Recently, a new regulatory factor of the ghrelin signaling has been identified, which is ghrelin-reactive immunoglobulins (Ig) (13). This review is the first attempt to summarize the data on ghrelin-reactive IgG obtained since their initial identification and the following studies in animal models of altered appetite and energy balance.

Methods

The review focuses mainly on the data from five papers, all reporting affinity kinetics of ghrelin- and desacyl-ghrelin-reactive IgG. They include a study of patients with hyperphagic obesity and anorexia nervosa (AN) and of ob/ob mice by Takagi et al. (13); two studies by François et al. in high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese mice (14) and in rats with methotrexate (MTX)-induced anorexia (15), a study by Lucas et al. in obese Zucker rats (16) as well as a Legrand et al. study in mice after chronic food-restriction and activity-based anorexia (17). In all mentioned studies, the same protocols of IgG plasma extraction and affinity kinetic assay by the surface plasmon resonance were used as was previously described in details (18). All measurements of ghrelin and desacyl-ghrelin peptides in above mentioned studies were performed using corresponding kits from Mitsubishi Chemical Med Corp. (Tokyo, Japan), selectively detecting acyl- and desacyl-ghrelin with resulting plasma ratios of 1:3 to 1:6 in humans. In the text, we use the terms of ghrelin and acyl-ghrelin as synonyms. For the statistical analysis of ghrelin and ghrelin-reactive IgG properties between different animal models and patients, they are shown as means of folds of changes vs. corresponding controls. In this analysis, we combined two animal models of anorexia including ABA mice and MTX rats and three animal models of obesity including ob/ob mice, HFD-induced obese mice, and obese Zucker rats. Group differences shown in Tables 1–4 and Figure 1 were analyzed using statistical tests indicated in the legends. We also used the Pearson’s test to analyze correlations between plasma levels of ghrelin or desacyl-ghrelin and plasma levels and affinity (KD values) of corresponding IgG.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Plasma concentrations of acyl-ghrelin and desacyl-ghrelin in humans and rodents.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Plasma levels of IgG reactive with acyl-ghrelin and desacyl-ghrelin in humans and rodents.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Affinity kinetics of acyl-ghrelin-reactive IgG in humans and rodents.

TABLE 4

Table 4. Affinity kinetics of desacyl-ghrelin-reactive IgG in humans and rodents.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Relative to control (Ctrl) values (1.0) changes in plasma ghrelin and desacyl ghrelin as well as affinity of their reactive IgG in patients and animal models of obesity and anorexia. Changes in plasma levels of acyl-ghrelin (A) and desacyl-ghrelin (C). Changes in affinity (dissociation equilibrium constant, KD) of plasmatic IgG for acyl-ghrelin (B) and desacyl ghrelin (D). AN, anorexia nervosa patients; An, animal models of anorexia; OB, obese patients or animals. Mann–Whitney tests ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, and *p < 0.05.

Detection of Ghrelin-Reactive IgG

Ghrelin-reactive IgG were first shown to be naturally present in plasma of healthy humans and rodents in 2008 by Fetissov et al. (19). Further studies confirmed and extended this initial finding by including female patients with restrictive AN (20) and with hyperphagic obesity (13). Moreover, a study using plasma samples of a large number of healthy male (n = 562) and female (n = 636) adolescents also revealed an ubiquitous presence of ghrelin-reactive autoantibodies of both IgG and IgM classes, which mean plasma levels were slightly elevated in girls vs. boys (21). In rodents, ghrelin-reactive IgG were detected in both rats (15, 19) and mice (13, 14, 17). Since the rodents studies were performed only in males, presence of possible sex differences of ghrelin-reactive IgG was not explored. However, it is likely that similarly to humans they may also be increased in female rodents who naturally display elevated plasma levels of total IgG and IgM as well as increased levels of autoantibodies reactive with other neuropeptides, e.g., α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) (22).

Ghrelin-reactive IgG were also measured in the hypothalamic and liver tissue of C57Bl6 mice, showing their levels at the limit of detection (13). However, if levels of ghrelin-reactive IgG in these tissues of lean mice were stratified according to their exposure to a restraint stress in an EchoMRI instrument, which they had undergone prior to tissue sample for the analysis of their body composition, an increase is observed in both tissues and a decrease in plasma of stressed animals. It suggests that ghrelin-reactive IgG may help transportation of ghrelin mobilized during stress from plasma to its tissue targets.

Desacyl-ghrelin-reactive IgG are also present in humans (13, 20) and rodents (15, 17). Although some part of desacyl-ghrelin-reactive IgG may bind to acyl-ghrelin, they should also have distinct paratopes, because levels of desacyl-ghrelin IgG are often higher than of acyl-ghrelin IgG in human plasma (13, 20) and also because they have different affinity kinetics properties (13). The exact epitopes responsible for plasma IgG binding to ghrelin and desacyl-ghrelin remain to be been studied.

Both “free” and “total” ghrelin- and desacyl-ghrelin-reactive IgG are detected in plasma of humans and rodents. While “free” IgG are measured in physiological buffer, the “total” levels are measured in a high salt buffer, which dissociate immune complexes typically resulting in increased “total” vs. “free” levels of IgG. Accordingly, increased levels of free/total ratios may reflect an increase in IgG available to bind ghrelin or desacyl-ghrelin (Table 2).

Origin and Regulation of Ghrelin-Reactive IgG

Ghrelin-reactive IgG are natural autoantibodies and, therefore, are produced by germ-like B-cells as a part of native immunity (23). As was postulated by Avrameas, natural autoantibodies may participate in a complex regulatory network, not necessarily directly related to the immune function but contributing to the homeostatic control (24). The production and affinity maturation of IgG are influenced by a variety of antigens and non-specific immune-stimulatory or inhibitory factors such as cytokines and steroid hormones. Moreover, increased plasma levels of ghrelin-reactive IgG in rats can be induced acutely by gastric electrical stimulation (25), suggesting that they can be stored and released upon a physiological stimulus. It is of interest that gastric electrical stimulation activated c-fos production in numerous lymphoid cells of the gastric mucosa surrounding the enteroendocrine ghrelin-synthetizing cells (26). Strong inhibition of ghrelin-reactive IgG levels in plasma is observed in rats after treatment with MTX, an immunosuppressive agent, which induces intestinal mucositis (15).

A particular role in production of IgG and other classes of Ig can be played by antigens derived from gut microbiota as a constitutive part of the gastro-intestinal tract in all animals (27). The gut bacterial antigens may also be involved in regulation of production and properties of ghrelin-reactive IgG. In fact, germ-free rats showed elevated plasma levels of ghrelin-reactive IgG (19), supporting a role of some intestinal antigens in tolerization toward ghrelin (28). The molecular basis linking microbial antigens with peptides may relate to the concept of molecular mimicry by cross-reactive autoantibody production (29). Indeed, sequence homology between ghrelin and several proteins from commensal gut microorganisms was shown, e.g., of seven consecutive amino acids present in a protein from Enterococcus faecalis (19). A role of molecular mimicry was recently validated as a mechanism underlying production of α-MSH-reactive IgG induced by caseinolytic peptidase B (ClpB) homolog protein from Escherichia coli (30). ClpB contains a discontinuous six amino acid homology with α-MSH; immunization of mice with ClpB generates α-MSH-cross reactive IgG (30). Plasma presence of the IgA class of ghrelin-reactive IgG also points to their origin triggered by luminal antigens (19).

Beside the stimulation of antigens from commensal gut microbiota, pathogenic and environmental microorganisms may possibly influence production of ghrelin-reactive IgG. In fact, plasma levels of ghrelin-reactive IgG in healthy adolescents correlate strongly with both IgG and IgM directed against influenza A virus (21). Although the initial in silico search for five consecutive amino acids sequence homology did not reveal matches between ghrelin and the Influenza viruses (19), a discontinuous eight amino acid homology for ghrelin is present in the PB1-F2 influenza A protein.

Another example of ghrelin-reactive IgG comes from studies of children with idiopathic short stature by the Lewinski group. They showed that prevalence of high level IgG reactive with several peptide hormones, including ghrelin, orexin A, leptin, and α-MSH combined, was associated with an increased incidence of Helicobacter pylori and/or Candida albicans (31). A follow-up study showed that mean plasma levels of ghrelin-reactive IgG were also elevated in children with short stature, but they were not significantly different in patients with growth hormone deficiency (32). Since H. pylori is only residing in the stomach, which is the main source of ghrelin, it is of interest to explore possible role of H. pylori in production of ghrelin-reactive IgG. In fact, cure of H. pylori in humans was accompanied by increased plasma levels of ghrelin (33).

Functional Role of Ghrelin-Reactive IgG

An established physiological role of IgG is to protect against infection including their ability to directly neutralize antigens and to trigger cell lysis via activation of the complement. While presence of IgG reactive with some peptide hormones have been detected in plasma of healthy humans (34), their possible functional role remained unknown, as previously reviewed (35). Ghrelin-reactive IgG were the first IgG revealing that they have a functional role in the peptide signaling by protecting ghrelin from degradation in plasma (13). In fact, as was shown by an in vitro assay, depletion of plasma from IgG resulted in an almost complete loss of acyl-ghrelin, while their reintroduction allowed its full recovery (13). Thus, the main functional role of ghrelin-reactive IgG appears to protect ghrelin from degradation.

Such protection did not reduce the orexigenic activity of ghrelin, because administrations of ghrelin together with plasmatic IgG, stimulated food intake and even enhanced it when IgG were derived from plasma of obese humans or mice (13). Such enhancing effect was explained by a slight, about three times, increase of IgG affinity for ghrelin and the evidence that such IgG are able to transport more active ghrelin in obese patients. Moreover, the KD values of ghrelin-reactive IgG remained in the micromolar range, which would preclude their competition with the nanomolar affinity of ghrelin receptor binding (36).

We show here that KD values of IgG for ghrelin correlate positively with plasma ghrelin concentrations in obese and AN patients as well as in ob/ob mice (Figures 2A,B). These correlations demonstrate that a decrease in IgG affinity for ghrelin (increase in KD) corresponds to higher ghrelin levels and suggest that properties of ghrelin-reactive IgG may at least partly underlie individual differences in plasma ghrelin levels. An inverse relation is unlikely, because increased antigen concentration should stimulate the affinity maturation of IgG. We also find that plasma levels of ghrelin-reactive free IgG as well as ratios of free/total IgG levels correlate positively with plasma ghrelin (Figures 2C,D). In contrast, ghrelin-reactive total IgG correlate negatively with plasma ghrelin (Figure 2E). Taken together, these correlations support a carrier role of plasmatic IgG for ghrelin.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Examples of correlations between affinity and levels of ghrelin-reactive IgG and plasma concentrations of acyl-ghrelin. Correlations between the values of dissociation equilibrium constants (KD) of plasmatic IgG reactive with ghrelin and acyl ghrelin in obese and anorectic patients and controls (A) and in ob/ob and lean mice (B). Correlations between plasma levels of ghrelin-reactive free IgG (C) as well as ratios of their free/total levels (D) in ob/ob and lean mice. Correlations between plasma levels of ghrelin-reactive total IgG in Zucker rats (E). R-squared and p-values for Pearson’s correlation tests are shown, **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05.

Considering increased functional effects of ghrelin in immune complex with IgG vs. ghrelin alone, the accompanying changes in plasma ghrelin levels during altered energy metabolism can be a “mirror” reflection of the ghrelin’s functional activity. Accordingly, increased plasma levels of ghrelin, e.g., in AN patients and in animal models of anorexia (Figure 1), may signify ghrelin’s inability to form stable immune complexes with IgG and, hence, may result in a functional deficiency of the ghrelin signaling or “ghrelin resistance.” Such explanation may appear at first glance as paradoxical, but it gains further support from the corroborating data revealing an enhancing role of IgG in signaling by other peptide hormones such as α-MSH (37, 38).

Thus, the changes in IgG affinity kinetics resulting in a slight increase of affinity can be considered as a gain of function in ghrelin signaling. Taking in account important functional consequences of affinity changes in ghrelin-reactive IgG, it is clear that a simple measurement of their plasma levels is not sufficient and should be combined with the affinity kinetics analysis. Nevertheless, affinity changes should still be taken with caution as a putative biomarker, as long as we do not know if they involve or not any epitope changes that may prevent the availability of the ghrelin N-terminal, necessary for the GHSR1 binding. We do not yet know if presence of IgG in immune complex with ghrelin may play an allosteric role in ghrelin receptor activation, a phenomenon suggested for IgG reactive with α-MSH (37, 38).

To summarize these data, presence of IgG at normal levels and with physiological micromolar affinity for ghrelin in humans appears as a homeostatic factor in regulation of ghrelin signaling. Accordingly, any changes in these factors should lead to alteration of the ghrelin signaling with resulting effects on appetite and body weight regulation. Therefore, in order to facilitate the data interpretation toward an enhanced or diminished ghrelin signaling, the following algorithm can be proposed.

For the enhanced ghrelin signaling one of several changes can be observed:

– Increased plasma levels of ghrelin-reactive both free and total IgG;

– Increased micromolar affinity of IgG for ghrelin;

– Changes in affinity kinetics of IgG for ghrelin toward its increased binding including increased association rate (small Ka) and/or decreased dissociation rate (small Kd).

By the opposite, for the diminished ghrelin signaling, the following changes can be present:

– Decreased plasma levels of ghrelin-reactive both free and total IgG;

– Decreased micromolar affinity of IgG for ghrelin;

– Changes in affinity kinetics of IgG for ghrelin toward its decreased binding including decreased association rate (small Ka) and/or increased dissociation rate (small Kd).

While the functional role of ghrelin-reactive IgG with regard to ghrelin’s orexigenic effect can be interpreted as facilitating, the corresponding role of IgG reactive with desacyl-ghrelin is uncertain. As discussed above, IgG may bind to the common central and the C-terminal parts of ghrelin and desacyl-ghrelin and, hence, may transport both types of peptides. In fact, absorption studies of ghrelin- and desacyl-ghrelin-reactive IgG confirmed that they can bind both peptides (20).

Although some studies showed potential anorexigenic effects of desacyl-ghrelin (39, 40), its functional role in the regulation of appetite remains uncertain including direct functional consequences of desacyl-ghrelin transport by IgG toward an unknown putative receptor (41). One alternative possibility is that desacyl-ghrelin may compete with acyl-ghrelin for protective IgG and, thereby, desacyl-ghrelin may have an anorexigenic effect by diminishing the ghrelin signaling via reduced formation of ghrelin/IgG immune complexes. Such possibility is of functional importance because starvation preferentially upregulates desacyl-ghrelin, e.g., its ratios to acyl-ghrelin can be increased from 1:20 in ad libitum fed mice to more than 1:70 in starved mice (Table 1) (17). Functional significance of the affinity kinetics changes in desacyl-ghrelin-reactive IgG is also difficult to interpret owning the same problem of the uncertain role of the desacyl-ghrelin peptide. Whether such changes are different from those obtained for acyl-ghrelin, it suggests that they may concern antibodies primarily targeting the desacylated N-terminal of ghrelin. It is, nevertheless, possible that decreased affinity of IgG for desacyl-ghrelin may be favorable for desacyl-ghrelin competition with ghrelin for ghrelin-protective IgG and, hence, may result in reduced orexigenic activity of ghrelin. Furthermore, we have seen that KD values of desacyl-ghrelin IgG correlate positively with plasma levels of desacyl-ghrelin in animals with anorexia. Significant correlations were also found between plasma levels of desacyl-ghrelin reactive IgG and desacyl-ghrelin in patients with obesity and AN. Such correlations suggest that, similar to acyl-ghrelin, desacyl-ghrelin plasma concentrations can also be regulated by desacyl-ghrelin-reactive IgG.

Ghrelin-Reactive-IgG in Obesity

Obesity is typically accompanied by increased food intake, suggesting a possible role of ghrelin in the mechanism of hyperphagia (42). Indeed, obese subjects are more sensitive than lean subjects to increase their food intake after ghrelin administration (43). A particular situation may exist in non-hyperphagic HFD-induced obesity in mice that are less sensitive to the ghrelin’s orexigenic effect (44). In obese subjects, basal plasma levels of ghrelin measured as total ghrelin (acyl-ghrelin + desacyl-ghrelin) were found low (45, 46) or normal when measured selectively for acyl-ghrelin (13, 47, 48) (Table 1). Thus, increased food intake in common obesity cannot be related to increased ghrelin concentrations. There are, nevertheless, some exceptions showing elevated plasma ghrelin in hyperphagic obese patients with the Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) (49) and hyperphagic obese Zucker rats (50, 51). However, our study showed that obese Zucker rats display elevated desacyl-ghrelin, while acyl-ghrelin remains normal (16) (Table 1).

IgG in obese patients showed their ability to better protect ghrelin from degradation by an in vitro test and to increase its orexigenic activity after intraperitoneal administrations in rats (13). Such ghrelin’s enhancing properties of IgG in obesity can be explained by its increased affinity, as discussed above. Similarly, increased affinity of IgG for ghrelin was found in genetic animal models of obesity including both ob/ob mice (13) and Zucker rats (16) (Table 3). Obesity in both rodent’s models is due to the deficient leptin signaling and is characterized by hyperphagia. In mice that developed obesity after 2 months of HFD, IgG was also characterized by increased affinity for ghrelin (Table 3); however, these mice are not hyperphagic. In contrast to other animal models of obesity and to obese patients, HFD-obese mice also showed an increase in affinity of desacyl-ghrelin IgG (Table 4), but the significance of such change is not clear. The affinity kinetic properties of the association and dissociation rates leading to increased affinity were all different between humans and animal models of obesity including increased small Ka in obese patients, a decrease of small Kd in ob/ob mice and Zucker rats, and no significant changes in HFD obese mice (Table 3).

Although plasma levels of ghrelin-reactive IgG in obese patients and in all animal models reviewed here were slightly lower than in their non-obese controls (Table 2), the free/total ratios of ghrelin-reactive IgG were increased in patients and in Zucker rats (Table 2). Interestingly, a recent conference report revealed elevated plasma levels of ghrelin-reactive IgG in children with PWS (52). If confirmed, it will be the only so far known pathological conditions characterized by increased production of ghrelin-reactive IgG.

Taken together, these data suggest that obesity development leads to increased carrying properties of IgG for ghrelin in both obese humans and in animal models of obesity via increased affinity (Figure 1). Such changes in ghrelin-reactive IgG properties may represent a mechanistic factor underlying enhanced ghrelin signaling leading to hyperphagia and increased adiposity.

Ghrelin-Reactive-IgG in Anorexia

Anorexia can be a primary problem in patient with eating disorders such as in restrictive AN, or it can be symptomatic during a chronic disease worsening its outcome. Ghrelin production and its plasma concentration are typically elevated during chronic starvation, accompanied or not by anorexia in both humans and experimental animals (13, 17, 53–56). Such elevation of plasma ghrelin suggests its homeostatic role in the long-term regulation of energy balance aimed at increased food intake, once food will be available (42). This homeostatic control is obviously not working in anorectic humans and rodents, who display functional “ghrelin resistance.” A role of plasmatic IgG in mechanisms of “ghrelin resistance” during anorexia can be suggested based on changes in their properties in an opposite way to obesity. In fact, patients with AN display lower affinity than in controls (Table 3), and many AN patients display also low plasma levels of ghrelin-reactive IgG (20). In the ABA and MTX rodent models of anorexia, we did not observe low affinity of IgG for ghrelin but it was present for desacyl-ghrelin (Tables 3 and 4). Such decrease of affinity was detected only in ABA mice but not in FTR mice that were starved but did not develop spontaneous anorexia, suggesting a possible contribution of desacyl-ghrelin-reactive IgG in the anorectic phenotype. MTX-treated rats, which develop severe anorexia, were also characterized by strong inhibition of ghrelin-reactive IgG levels (15). As discussed above, lower levels and affinity of IgG for both ghrelin and desacyl-ghrelin may decrease ghrelin’s orexigenic effects. Such possibility was not, however, experimentally validated.

Whether IgG may improve ghrelin’s orexigenic effects was tested in the ABA model in mice, but the orexigenic effects of treatments were limited to the 3 h of daily feeding time, which was not sufficient to fully evaluate their enhancing roles (17). In any case, only IgG from obese mice were efficient to significantly improve ghrelin’s orexigenic effect.

These data suggest that factors which specifically or non-specifically decrease plasma levels and affinity of ghrelin-reactive IgG may diminish ghrelin’s orexigenic effects and, hence, will contribute to the mechanisms of anorexia via functional “ghrelin resistance.”

Conclusion

The main conclusions that can be drawn after reviewing these data are the existence of a functional link between ghrelin-reactive IgG and plasma ghrelin levels as well as a physiological role of ghrelin-reactive IgG in modulating ghrelin’s biological activities including conditions of altered energy balance. A summary Figure 3 schematically illustrates the postulated link between ghrelin-reactive IgG and regulation of appetite whereas changes in IgG properties during obesity and anorexia may enhance or diminish ghrelin signaling, while desacyl-ghrelin may compete with ghrelin for IgG which protect ghrelin from deacylation.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. A schematic model summarizing the postulated role of ghrelin-reactive IgG in ghrelin signaling in appetite control during normal and pathological conditions. According this model, acyl-ghrelin is protected by IgG from deacylation, therefore enhancing its orexigenic signaling to the brain. Changes in affinity of IgG for ghrelin in obese patients (increase) and in orexia nervosa patients (decrease) may enhance and diminish, respectively, ghrelin’s orexigenic effects. Desacyl-ghrelin may lower orexigenic effect via competing with ghrelin for ghrelin-reactive IgG resulting in increased ghrelin degradation. Moreover, decreased affinity of IgG for desacyl ghrelin may favor its dissociation from immune complexes and completion with ghrelin. The origin of changes in affinity of ghrelin- and desacyl ghrelin-reactive IgG is currently unknown but may potentially depend on antigenic stimulation from dysbiotic gut microbiota associated with long-term nutritional modifications in anorexia and obesity.

Data analysis from patients and several animal models of altered energy balance shows that both obese humans and animals display lower levels of ghrelin-reactive IgG characterized by increased affinity. In contrast, patients with AN and anorectic rodents all show lower affinity of ghrelin- and desacyl-ghrelin-reactive IgG, respectively, the changes which were not observed in non-anorectic chronically starved mice. Such changes in properties of both ghrelin- and desacyl-ghrelin-reactive IgG in patients with obesity and anorexia suggest that they are not a direct consequence of the positive or negative energy balance per se but may be a result of some typical changes associated with altered regulation of energy metabolism impacting on the autoantibody production. Although the mechanisms of such common changes are currently unknown, they may potentially involve modifications of gut microbiota leading to altered production of ghrelin-like antigenic molecules. Indeed, typical, but not identical response of gut microbiota to starvation or an obesogenic diet may potentially explain similar autoantibody response including production of ghrelin-reactive IgG, which may contribute to the long-term regulation of host energy metabolisms by gut microbiota (57). Further studies are needed to identify potential ghrelin-mimetic antigens in gut microbiota and to analyze the effects of altered energy balance on their production.

Author Contributions

SF wrote the manuscript, NL prepared the figures and tables, NL and RL analyzed the data and contributed to manuscript preparation.

Conflict of Interest Statement

SF is a co-founder of TargEDys SA and NL and RL are currently its employees.

Funding

The reviewed studies were partly supported from the Region of Haute Normandie, France, Fonds Français Alimentation et Santé, Fondation Charles Nicolle and Nutriset, France.

References

1. Kojima M, Hosoda H, Date Y, Nakazato M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K. Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature (1999) 402(6762):656–60. doi:10.1038/45230

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Nakazato M, Murakami N, Date Y, Kojima M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K, et al. A role for ghrelin in the central regulation of feeding. Nature (2001) 409(6817):194–8. doi:10.1038/35051587

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Asakawa A, Inui A, Kaga T, Yuzuriha H, Nagata T, Ueno N, et al. Ghrelin is an appetite-stimulatory signal from stomach with structural resemblance to motilin. Gastroenterology (2001) 120(2):337–45. doi:10.1053/gast.2001.22158

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Tschöp M, Smiley DL, Heiman ML. Ghrelin induces adiposity in rodents. Nature (2000) 407(6806):908–13. doi:10.1038/35038090

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Davenport AP, Bonner TI, Foord SM, Harmar AJ, Neubig RR, Pin J-P, et al. International Union of Pharmacology. LVI. Ghrelin receptor nomenclature, distribution, and function. Pharmacol Rev (2005) 57(4):541–6. doi:10.1124/pr.57.4.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Bednarek MA, Feighner SD, Pong SS, McKee KK, Hreniuk DL, Silva MV, et al. Structure-function studies on the new growth hormone-releasing peptide, ghrelin: minimal sequence of ghrelin necessary for activation of growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a. J Med Chem (2000) 43(23):4370–6. doi:10.1021/jm0001727

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hosoda H, Kojima M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K. Ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin: two major forms of rat ghrelin peptide in gastrointestinal tissue. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2000) 279(3):909–13. doi:10.1006/bbrc.2000.4039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Asakawa A, Inui A, Kaga T, Katsuura G, Fujimiya M, Fujino MA, et al. Antagonism of ghrelin receptor reduces food intake and body weight gain in mice. Gut (2003) 52(7):947–52. doi:10.1136/gut.52.7.947

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. De Vriese C, Gregoire F, Lema-Kisoka R, Waelbroeck M, Robberecht P, Delporte C. Ghrelin degradation by serum and tissue homogenates: identification of the cleavage sites. Endocrinology (2004) 145(11):4997–5005. doi:10.1210/en.2004-0569

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Satou M, Nishi Y, Yoh J, Hattori Y, Sugimoto H. Identification and characterization of acyl-protein thioesterase 1/lysophospholipase I as a ghrelin deacylation/lysophospholipid hydrolyzing enzyme in fetal bovine serum and conditioned medium. Endocrinology (2010) 151(10):4765–75. doi:10.1210/en.2010-0412

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Tong J, Dave N, Mugundu GM, Davis HW, Gaylinn BD, Thorner MO, et al. The pharmacokinetics of acyl, des-acyl, and total ghrelin in healthy human subjects. Eur J Endocrinol (2013) 168(6):821–8. doi:10.1530/eje-13-0072

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Depoortere I. Targeting the ghrelin receptor to regulate food intake. Regul Pept (2009) 156(1–3):13–23. doi:10.1016/j.regpep.2009.04.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Takagi K, Legrand R, Asakawa A, Amitani H, François M, Tennoune N, et al. Anti-ghrelin immunoglobulins modulate ghrelin stability and its orexigenic effect in obese mice and humans. Nat Commun (2013) 4:2685. doi:10.1038/ncomms3685

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. François M, Barde S, Legrand R, Lucas N, Azhar S, el Dhaybi M, et al. High-fat diet increases ghrelin-expressing cells in stomach, contributing to obesity. Nutrition (2016) 32(6):709–15. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2015.12.034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. François M, Takagi K, Legrand R, Lucas N, Beutheu Youmba S, Bôle-Feysot C, et al. Increased ghrelin but low ghrelin-reactive immunoglobulins in a rat model of methotrexate chemotherapy-induced anorexia. Front Nutr (2016) 3:23. doi:10.3389/fnut.2016.00023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Lucas N, Legrand R, Breton J, Déchelotte P, Fetissov S. Increased affinity of ghrelin-reactive immunoglobulins in obese Zucker rats. Nutrition (2016). doi:10.1016/j.nut.2016.11.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Legrand R, Lucas N, Breton J, Azhar S, do Rego J-C, Déchelotte P, et al. Ghrelin treatment prevents development of activity based anorexia in mice. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol (2016) 26(6):948–58. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.03.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Legrand R, Takagi K, Fetissov SO. Immunoglobulin G preparation from plasma samples and analysis of its affinity kinetic binding to peptide hormones. Protoc Exch (2014). doi:10.1038/protex.2014.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Fetissov SO, Hamze Sinno M, Coëffier M, Bole-Feysot C, Ducrotté P, Hökfelt T, et al. Autoantibodies against appetite-regulating peptide hormones and neuropeptides: putative modulation by gut microflora. Nutrition (2008) 24(4):348–59. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2007.12.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Terashi M, Asakawa A, Harada T, Ushikai M, Coquerel Q, Sinno MH, et al. Ghrelin reactive autoantibodies in restrictive anorexia nervosa. Nutrition (2011) 27(4):407–13. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2011.01.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. François M, Schaefer JM, Bole-Feysot C, Déchelotte P, Verhulst FC, Fetissov SO. Ghrelin-reactive immunoglobulins and anxiety, depression and stress-induced cortisol response in adolescents. The TRAILS study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry (2015) 59(0):1–7. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.12.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Tennoune N, Legrand R, Ouelaa W, Breton J, Lucas N, Bole-Feysot C, et al. Sex-related effects of nutritional supplementation of Escherichia coli: relevance to eating disorders. Nutrition (2015) 31(3):498–507. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2014.11.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Tlaskalova-Hogenova H, Mandel L, Stepankova R, Bartova J, Barot R, Leclerc M, et al. Autoimmunity: from physiology to pathology. Natural antibodies, mucosal immunity and development of B cell repertoire. Folia Biol (Praha) (1992) 38(3–4):202–15.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

24. Avrameas S. Natural autoantibodies: from ‘horror autotoxicus’ to ‘gnothi seauton’. Immunol Today (1991) 12(5):154–9. doi:10.1016/S0167-5699(05)80045-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Gallas S, Fetissov SO. Ghrelin, appetite and gastric electrical stimulation. Peptides (2011) 32(11):2283–9. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2011.05.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Gallas S, Sinno MH, Boukhettala N, Coëffier M, Dourmap N, Gourcerol G, et al. Gastric electrical stimulation increases ghrelin production and inhibits catecholaminergic brainstem neurons in rats. Eur J Neurosci (2011) 33(2):276–84. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07474.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Kau AL, Ahern PP, Griffin NW, Goodman AL, Gordon JI. Human nutrition, the gut microbiome and the immune system. Nature (2011) 474(7351):327–36. doi:10.1038/nature10213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Hardet R, Chevalier B, Dupaty L, Naimi Y, Riou G, Drouot L, et al. Oral-tolerization prevents immune responses and improves transgene persistence following gene transfer mediated by adeno-associated viral vector. Mol Ther (2016) 24(1):87–95. doi:10.1038/mt.2015.146

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Oldstone MB. Molecular mimicry, microbial infection, and autoimmune disease: evolution of the concept. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol (2005) 296:1–17.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

30. Tennoune N, Chan P, Breton J, Legrand R, Chabane YN, Akkermann K, et al. Bacterial ClpB heat-shock protein, an antigen-mimetic of the anorexigenic peptide [alpha]-MSH, at the origin of eating disorders. Transl Psychiatry (2014) 4:e458. doi:10.1038/tp.2014.98

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Stawerska R, Czkwianianc E, Matusiak A, Smyczynska J, Hilczer M, Chmiela M, et al. Prevalence of autoantibodies against some selected growth and appetite-regulating neuropeptides in serum of short children exposed to Candida albicans colonization and/or Helicobacter pylori infection: the molecular mimicry phenomenon. Neuro Endocrinol Lett (2015) 36(5):458–64.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

32. Stawerska R, Czkwianianc E, Matusiak A, Smyczynska J, Hilczer M, Chmiela M, et al. Assessment of ghrelin, leptin, orexin A and alpha-MSH serum concentrations and the levels of the autoantibodies against the aforementioned peptides in relation to Helicobacter pylori infections and Candida albicans colonization in children with short stature. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab (2016) 21(3):102–10. doi:10.18544/PEDM-21.03.0031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Nwokolo CU, Freshwater DA, O’Hare P, Randeva HS. Plasma ghrelin following cure of Helicobacter pylori. Gut (2003) 52(5):637–40. doi:10.1136/gut.52.5.637

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Sebriakova M, Little JA. A method for the determination of plasma insulin antibodies and its application in normal and diabetic subjects. Diabetes (1973) 22(1):30–40. doi:10.2337/diab.22.1.30

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Fetissov SO, Hamze Sinno M, Coquerel Q, Do Rego JC, Coëffier M, Gilbert D, et al. Emerging role of autoantibodies against appetite-regulating neuropeptides in eating disorders. Nutrition (2008) 24(9):854–9. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2008.06.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Holst B, Brandt E, Bach A, Heding A, Schwartz TW. Nonpeptide and peptide growth hormone secretagogues act both as ghrelin receptor agonist and as positive or negative allosteric modulators of ghrelin signaling. Mol Endocrinol (2005) 19(9):2400–11. doi:10.1210/me.2005-0059

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Lucas N, Legrand R, Akkermann K, Harro J, Bole-Feysot C, Breton J, et al. Anti-α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone autoantibodies in patients with eating disorders and melanocortin 4 receptor signaling. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol (2014) 24:S704–5. doi:10.1016/S0924-977X(14)71136-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Lucas N, Legrand R, Ouelaa W, Breton J, Tennoune N, Bole-Feysot C, et al. Effects of rabbit anti-α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) immunoglobulins on α-MSH signaling related to food intake control. Neuropeptides (2014) 48:21–7. doi:10.1016/j.npep.2013.10.017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Asakawa A, Inui A, Fujimiya M, Sakamaki R, Shinfuku N, Ueta Y, et al. Stomach regulates energy balance via acylated ghrelin and desacyl ghrelin. Gut (2005) 54(1):18–24. doi:10.1136/gut.2004.038737

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Fernandez G, Cabral A, Cornejo MP, De Francesco PN, Garcia-Romero G, Reynaldo M, et al. Des-acyl ghrelin directly targets the arcuate nucleus in a ghrelin-receptor independent manner and impairs the orexigenic effect of ghrelin. J Neuroendocrinol (2016) 28(2). doi:10.1111/jne.12349

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Filigheddu N, Gnocchi VF, Coscia M, Cappelli M, Porporato PE, Taulli R, et al. Ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin promote differentiation and fusion of C2C12 skeletal muscle cells. Mol Biol Cell (2007) 18(3):986–94. doi:10.1091/mbc.E06-05-0402

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Cummings DE. Ghrelin and the short- and long-term regulation of appetite and body weight. Physiol Behav (2006) 89(1):71–84. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.05.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Druce MR, Wren AM, Park AJ, Milton JE, Patterson M, Frost G, et al. Ghrelin increases food intake in obese as well as lean subjects. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord (2005) 29(9):1130–6. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Zigman JM, Bouret SG, Andrews ZB. Obesity impairs the action of the neuroendocrine ghrelin system. Trends Endocrinol Metab (2016) 27(1):54–63. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2015.09.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Tschöp M, Weyer C, Tataranni PA, Devanarayan V, Ravussin E, Heiman ML. Circulating ghrelin levels are decreased in human obesity. Diabetes (2001) 50(4):707–9. doi:10.2337/diabetes.50.4.707

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Shiiya T, Nakazato M, Mizuta M, Date Y, Mondal MS, Tanaka M, et al. Plasma ghrelin levels in lean and obese humans and the effect of glucose on ghrelin secretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2002) 87(1):240–4. doi:10.1210/jcem.87.1.8129

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Barazzoni R, Zanetti M, Ferreira C, Vinci P, Pirulli A, Mucci M, et al. Relationships between desacylated and acylated ghrelin and insulin sensitivity in the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2007) 92(10):3935–40. doi:10.1210/jc.2006-2527

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Pacifico L, Poggiogalle E, Costantino F, Anania C, Ferraro F, Chiarelli F, et al. Acylated and nonacylated ghrelin levels and their associations with insulin resistance in obese and normal weight children with metabolic syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol (2009) 161(6):861–70. doi:10.1530/eje-09-0375

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Cummings DE, Clement K, Purnell JQ, Vaisse C, Foster KE, Frayo RS. Elevated plasma ghrelin levels in Prader Willi syndrome. Nat Med (2002) 8:643–4. doi:10.1038/nm0702-643

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Ariyasu H, Takaya K, Hosoda H, Iwakura H, Ebihara K, Mori K, et al. Delayed short-term secretory regulation of ghrelin in obese animals: evidenced by a specific RIA for the active form of ghrelin. Endocrinology (2002) 143(9):3341–50. doi:10.1210/en.2002-220225

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Beck B, Richy S, Stricker-Krongrad A. Ghrelin and body weight regulation in the obese Zucker rat in relation to feeding state and dark/light cycle. Exp Biol Med (2003) 228(10):1124–31.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

52. Crisp G, Nyunt O, Musthaffa Y, Seim I, Chopin L, Harris M, et al. Ghrelin-reactive autoantibodies are elevated in children with Prader-Willi syndrome compared to unaffected sibling controls. 55th Annual Conference of European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology. Paris, France: ESPE Abstracts (2016).

Google Scholar

53. Otto B, Tschöp M, Frühauf E, Heldwein W, Fichter M, Otto C, et al. Postprandial ghrelin release in anorectic patients before and after weight gain. Psychoneuroendocrinology (2005) 30(6):577–81. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.01.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Germain N, Galusca B, Grouselle D, Frere D, Tolle V, Zizzari P, et al. Ghrelin/obestatin ratio in two populations with low body weight: constitutional thinness and anorexia nervosa. Psychoneuroendocrinology (2009) 34(3):413–9. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Méquinion M, Langlet F, Zgheib S, Dickson S, Dehouck B, Chauveau C, et al. Ghrelin: central and peripheral implications in anorexia nervosa. Front Endocrinol (2013) 4:15. doi:10.3389/fendo.2013.00015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. François M, Barde S, Achamrah N, Breton J, do Rego J-C, Coëffier M, et al. The number of preproghrelin mRNA expressing cells is increased in mice with activity-based anorexia. Neuropeptides (2015) 51:17–23. doi:10.1016/j.npep.2015.04.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Fetissov SO. Role of the gut microbiota in host appetite control: bacterial growth to animal feeding behaviour. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2017) 13:11–25. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2016.150

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar