Skip to main content

SPECIALTY GRAND CHALLENGE article

Front. Disaster Emerg. Med., 11 December 2023
Sec. Emergency Health Services
This article is part of the Research Topic Grand Challenges in Disaster and Emergency Medicine: 2023 View all articles

Specialty grand challenge: emergency health services

  • Department of Emergency Medicine, Emergency Health Services, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States

Introduction

Emergency health services encompass a wide-ranging, diverse, and overarching impact on the health and well-being of individuals, communities, and large populations everywhere. The recent COVID-19 pandemic, during which emergency care providers played a leading and often heroic role in the response, highlights the critical importance of emergency healthcare staff and infrastructure (1, 2).

Emergency medicine is at the intersection of acute medical care at the individual level and public health at the population level. Moreover, the specialty is relatively new within the field of medicine, developing its specific training and areas of expertise only in the mid-to-late 20th century (3, 4). As such, the field of emergency health services faces both great challenges and unique opportunities as the specialty continues to grow and expand its impact.

Demographic challenges—aging populations

Improvements in living conditions and public health, as well as advances in medicine, have led to a remarkable increase in life expectancy over the past century. As a result, the world's population over the age of 60 will nearly double by 2050 (5). This remarkable demographic shift will present significant challenges throughout society and in particular for healthcare delivery systems, with the UN World Health Organization declaring a “Decade of Healthy Ageing” (6, 7).

Increasing physical frailty, multiple chronic comorbidities, and cognitive and social challenges mean that older adults will need increasing levels of acute unscheduled care through emergency health services (8, 9). A number of initiatives are underway to address this coming so-called “silver tsunami” (10). In the United States, the American College of Emergency Physicians launched the Geriatric ED Accreditation program in 2018 to recognize and certify emergency departments (EDs) committed to delivering appropriate, quality emergency care to the senior population, with over 400 such EDs now accredited at three levels (1113). Assessment of the impact of these efforts in emergency health services is needed to guide and develop future initiatives and efforts to improve the care and well-being of older adults.

Resource challenges—capacity limitations

Emergency health services are resource-intense—where unscheduled care is available at all times for undifferentiated acute illness and injury, with the apt motto “Anyone, Anything, Anytime” (14, 15). Increasing reliance on EDs and emergency medical services (EMS) for essentially on-demand care now often exceeds the limited resources and capacity in many parts of the world, including developed countries with robust healthcare systems (16, 17).

Factors impacting this imbalance include the demographic changes and aging noted earlier; misaligned payment incentive systems, resulting in inefficient or inappropriate care; and overall insufficient capacity, particularly for inpatient care as demand grows (18, 19).

A conceptual model of emergency care patient flow and crowding developed by Asplin et al. (20) focuses on three key processes: input (or patient/care demand), throughput (care delivery, particularly in hospital EDs), and output (patient disposition—discharge, admission, or other; Figure 1) (21).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Conceptual framework of acute care and emergency services system.

Despite efforts to address these processes in emergency health services, the problem has only worsened over the intervening decades (22). The result is long waits for care in overwhelmed hospitals and EDs, particularly for ED boarders—admitted inpatients waiting for patient beds—creating access issue challenges, and grave concerns regarding care quality when demand so greatly outpaces resources and capacity (2325).

Another resource challenge is the shortage of healthcare workers and providers. Trends have accelerated following the COVID-19 pandemic, with significant impacts on staff wellness and burnout, as well as recruitment and attrition of critical personnel, particularly in emergency health services (2629).

Technology challenges—advances in medicine

Like all fields, new technologies are rapidly advancing in medicine with both tremendous promise and risks. Rapid diagnostics that are both accurate and cost-effective have the potential to markedly improve the efficiency and quality of care in both high- and low-resourced communities. The widespread use of rapid diagnostic panels for gastrointestinal and respiratory pathogens is revolutionizing the evaluation and management of these conditions (30).

In addition, the advancement of new treatments for acute and chronic conditions, such as cancer, vascular diseases, and metabolic syndromes, is having an impact on emergency care in terms of both specific disease management and treatment complications (31). These medical advances will continue to provide great opportunities as well as challenges for emergency health service providers.

Similarly, the information technology revolution is having a profound impact on healthcare and emergency health services (32). The transition to electronic health records and the vast accumulation of personal health data will only accelerate this impact (33). Artificial intelligence, machine learning algorithms, and natural language processing are now readily being tested and adopted in healthcare. These advances have the potential to not only increase efficiency and reduce staff burden (like documentation) but also increase the risk of errors, bias, and overreliance on technology to deliver care (34). These risks are all the greater in the time-intensive emergency health services setting (3537).

Challenges in disaster response and resilience—climate change

Over the last century, large-scale disasters have increased markedly in terms of both frequency and magnitude (38). Emergency health services are critical to the immediate response and resilience infrastructure and to mitigate the impact of these events on the health of humankind.

Climate change is accelerating disaster events, creating challenges for existing emergency care infrastructure and resources (39, 40). Extreme heat events, wildfires and smoke/particulate air pollution, and severe flooding are just a few climate-related impacts that result in mass injury and illnesses (41, 42). Current emergency health services are ill-prepared to handle this impact and must begin to prepare for a world in which these events are commonplace and frequent (43).

Expanding human development is also leading to new challenges, such as outbreaks of novel zoonotic infectious diseases in the human population. The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic is a reflection of the potential scale and devastating impact on an individual, community, and worldwide level, placing tremendous strain on our acute care infrastructure and emergency health services systems (44, 45).

Public and population health challenges

Emergency health services are at the nexus and intersection of individual patient care and community public health (46, 47). The remarkable reduction in trauma-related morbidity and mortality over the past several decades is the result of both improvements in acute trauma care and public health measures to prevent and reduce injury on a population level (48). Similar challenges and opportunities exist in other arenas including the immediate care of acute vascular diseases, metabolic syndromes, and cancer.

With its unique role within a community, emergency health services are vulnerable to the various social factors impacting health in a given region, the so-called social determinants of health. These include economic factors, access to shelter and nutrition, and critical equity issues that create underlying risks to certain individuals and specific communities (49).

These challenges represent a tremendous opportunity for emergency providers to play critical roles in not only providing acute care for communities but also addressing underlying issues and complexities on a public health and population health basis.

Emergency health services—the “availablists”

Emergency health services, focused on the core competency of acute care at any hour for those in need with critical illness or injury, are relatively new in the field of medicine. While traditionally based in hospital EDs and EMS prehospital systems, new opportunities and challenges are rising in the areas of on-demand medical care for a wide variety of healthcare needs in diverse settings. These include the rapid adoption of telemedicine and virtual care; express, urgent, and freestanding ED units outside of hospitals; progressive hospital at-home programs for post-acute care; and other remote virtual care settings (5053).

Other innovations include social and psychiatric field teams for the prehospital setting, as well as community paramedicine programs now being adopted in many communities (54). All these opportunities leverage the so-called core competency of emergency providers—providing care across a wide range of specialties at any time in any setting—as Hollander and Sharma call it, being available, or “Availabilists” (55).

A significant challenge for emergency health services will be to demonstrate both the quality and value of these innovations. Emergency health services research efforts should focus on how these innovations improve emergency care for individuals in acute medical need and provide cost-effective, equitable care and access within communities and for public health.

Author contributions

TC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, (2019). N Engl J Med. (2020) 382:727–33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Yau SY, Lee CY, Lai HY, Lee CH. COVID-19-related stress among emergency physicians: a scoping review protocol on the stressors and coping strategies. BMJ Open. (2023) 13:e068085. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Huecker MR, Shreffler J, Platt M, O'Brien D, Stanton R, Mulligan T, et al. Emergency medicine history and expansion into the future: a narrative review. West J Emerg Med. (2022) 23:418–23. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.2.55108

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Mackenzie R. Brief history of pre-hospital emergency medicine. Emerg Med J. (2018) 35:146–8. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. World Health Organization. (2013). Available online at: https://www.who.int/data/maternal-newborn-child-adolescent-ageing/ageing-data/ageing—demographics (accessed October 6, 2023).

Google Scholar

6. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet. (2009) 374:1196–208. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61460-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. World Health Organization. (2023). Available online at: https://www.who.int/initiatives/decade-of-healthy-ageing (accessed October 6, 2023).

Google Scholar

8. Mitchell GW. The silver tsunami. Physician Exec. (2014) 40:34–8.

Google Scholar

9. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. (2013) 381:752–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Shadyab AH, Castillo EM, Chan TC, Tolia VM. Developing and implementing a geriatric emergency department (GED): overview and characteristics of GED visits. J Emerg Med. (2021) 61:131–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.02.036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Gettel CJ, Hwang U, Janke AT, Rothenberg C, Tomasino DF, Schneider SM, et al. An outcome comparison between geriatric and nongeriatric emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. (2023) 82:681–9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.05.01

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kennedy M, Lesser A, Israni J, Liu SW, Santangelo I, Tidwell N, et al. Reach and adoption of a geriatric emergency department accreditation program in the United States. Ann Emerg Med. (2022) 79:367–73. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.06.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. A Practical Guide to Implementing a Geriatric Emergency Department by West Health UC San Diego Health - westhealth.org. Available online at: https://www.westhealth.org/resource/ged-implementation-guide/ (accessed October 6, 2023).

Google Scholar

14. Zink B. Anyone, Anything, Anytime: A History of Emergency Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, Inc. (2006).

Google Scholar

15. Stadler DE, Donihoo RS, Brady MF. Bring ‘Em All. Chaos. Care. Stories from Medicine's Front Line. Dallas, TX: American College of Emergency Physicians. (2018).

Google Scholar

16. Institute of Medicine. Hospital-Based Emergency Care: At the Breaking Point. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. (2007).

Google Scholar

17. Hsia RY, Zagorov S, Sarkar N, Savides MT, Feldmeier M, Addo N. Patterns in patient encounters and emergency department capacity in California, 2011-2021. JAMA Netw Open. (2023) 6:e2319438. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.19438

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Kellermann AL. Crisis in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. (2006) 355:1300–3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp068194

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Moskop JC, Sklar DP, Geiderman JM, Schears RM, Bookman KJ. Emergency department crowding, part 1–concept, causes, and moral consequences. Ann Emerg Med. (2009) 53:605–11. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.09.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Asplin BR, Magid DJ, Rhodes KV, Solberg LI, Lurie N, Camargo CA Jr. A conceptual model of emergency department crowding. Ann Emerg Med. (2003) 42:173–80. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.302

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Moskop JC, Sklar DP, Geiderman JM, Schears RM, Bookman KJ. Emergency department crowding, part 2–barriers to reform and strategies to overcome them. Ann Emerg Med. (2009) 53:612–7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.09.024

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Kelen GD, Wolfe R, D'Onofrio G, et al. Emergency department crowding: the canary in the health care system. In: NEJM Catalyst. (2021). Available online at: https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.21.0217 (accessed October 6, 2023).

Google Scholar

23. Berg LM, Ehrenberg A, Florin J, Östergren J, Discacciati A, Göransson KE. Associations between crowding and ten-day mortality among patients allocated lower triage acuity levels without need of acute hospital care on departure from the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. (2019) 74:345–56. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.04.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Verelst S, Wouters P, Gillet JB, Van den Berghe G. Emergency department crowding in relation to in-hospital adverse medical events: a large prospective observational cohort study. J Emerg Med. (2015) 49:949–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.05.034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Bernstein SL, Aronsky D, Duseja R, Epstein S, Handel D, Hwang U, et al. Society for academic emergency medicine, emergency department crowding task force. The effect of emergency department crowding on clinically oriented outcomes. Acad Emerg Med. (2009) 16:1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00295.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Poon YR, Lin YP, Griffiths P, Yong KK, Seah B, Liaw SY, et al. Global overview of healthcare workers' turnover intention amid COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review with future directions. Hum Resour Health. (2022) 20:70. doi: 10.1186/s12960-022-00764-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Gualano MR, Sinigaglia T, Lo Moro G, Rousset S, Cremona A, Bert F, et al. The burden of burnout among Healthcare Professionals of Intensive Care Units and emergency departments during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:8172. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158172

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Wahlster S, Sharma M, Lewis AK, Patel PV, Hartog CS, Jannotta G, et al. The Coronavirus Disease (2019). Pandemic's effect on critical care resources and health-care providers: a global survey. Chest. (2021) 159:619–33. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Zhang Q, Mu MC, He Y, Cai ZL, Li ZC. Burnout in emergency medicine physicians: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Medicine. (2020) 99:e21462. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021462

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Timbrook TT, Morton JB, McConeghy KW, Caffrey AR, Mylonakis E, LaPlante KL. The effect of molecular rapid diagnostic testing on clinical outcomes in bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. (2017) 64:15–23. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Hryniewicki AT, Wang C, Shatsky RA, Coyne CJ. Management of immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicities: a review and clinical guideline for emergency physicians. J Emerg Med. (2018) 55:489–502. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.07.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Naik N, Hameed BMZ, Sooriyaperakasam N, Vinayahalingam S, Patil V, Smriti K, et al. Transforming healthcare through a digital revolution: A review of digital healthcare technologies and solutions. Front Digit Health. (2022) 4:919985. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.919985

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Mullins A, O'Donnell R, Mousa M, Rankin D, Ben-Meir M, Boyd-Skinner C, et al. Health outcomes and healthcare efficiencies associated with the use of electronic health records in hospital emergency departments: a systematic review. J Med Syst. (2020) 44:200. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-01660-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Lee P, Bubeck S, Petro J. Benefits, limits, and risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for medicine. N Engl J Med. (2023) 388:1233–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr2214184

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Vearrier L, Derse AR, Basford JB, Larkin GL, Moskop JC. Artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: benefits, risks, and recommendations. J Emerg Med. (2022) 62:492–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.01.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Chenais G, Lagarde E, Gil-Jardiné C. Artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: viewpoint of current applications and foreseeable opportunities and challenges. J Med Internet Res. (2023) 25:e40031. doi: 10.2196/40031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Kirubarajan A, Taher A, Khan S, Masood S. Artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: a scoping review. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. (2020) 1:1691–702. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12277

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Institute for Economics & Peace. Ecological Threat Register 2020: Understanding Ecological Threats, Resilience Peace. Sydney, NSW (2020). Available online at: http://visionofhumanity.org/reports (accessed November 30, 2023).

Google Scholar

39. The Economist: Weather-Related Diasters are Increasing. Available online at: https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2017/08/29/weather-related-disasters-are-increasing (accessed August 29, 2017).

Google Scholar

40. Romanello M, Di Napoli C, Drummond P, Green C, Kennard H, Lampard P, et al. The 2022 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: health at the mercy of fossil fuels. Lancet. (2022) 400:1619–54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01540-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Parks RM, Bennett JE, Tamura-Wicks H, Kontis V, Toumi R, Danaei G, et al. Anomalously warm temperatures are associated with increased injury deaths. Nat Med. (2020) 26:65–70. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0721-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Aguilera R, Hansen K, Gershunov A, Ilango SD, Sheridan P, Benmarhnia T. Respiratory hospitalizations and wildfire smoke: a spatiotemporal analysis of an extreme firestorm in San Diego County, California. Environ Epidemiol. (2020) 4:e114. doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Sorensen CJ, Salas RN, Rublee C, Hill K, Bartlett ES, Charlton P, et al. Clinical implications of climate change on US emergency medicine: challenges and opportunities. Ann Emerg Med. (2020) 76:168–78. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Morse SS, Mazet JA, Woolhouse M, Parrish CR, Carroll D, Karesh WB, et al. Prediction and prevention of the next pandemic zoonosis. Lancet. (2012) 380:1956–65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61684-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Savitt A, Gerber-Chavez L, Montano S, Corbin T. Emergency management pandemic planning: an analysis of state emergency plans. J Emerg Manag. (2023) 21:97–109. doi: 10.5055/jem.0667

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Bernstein E, Goldfrank LR, Kellerman AL, Hargarten SW, Jui J, Fish SS, et al. A public health approach to emergency medicine: preparing for the twenty-first century. Acad Emerg Med. (1994) 1:277–86 doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1994.tb02446.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Hauswald M, Gerson LW, Kerr NL. Public health and emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. (2009) 16:1040–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00541.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Norton R, Kobusingye O. Injuries. N Engl J Med. (2013) 368:1723–30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1109343

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Anderson ES, Lippert S, Newberry J, Bernstein E, Alter HJ, Wang NE. Addressing social determinants of health from the emergency department through social emergency medicine. West J Emerg Med. (2016) 17:487–9. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.5.30240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Hollander JE, Davis TM, Doarn C, Goldwater JC, Klasko S, Lowery C, et al. Recommendations from the first national academic consortium of telehealth. Popul. Health Manag. 21:271–7. doi: 10.1089/pop.2017.0080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. American College of Emergency Physicians: Freestanding Emergency Departments. Freestanding Emergency Departments | ACEP. (2014). Available online at: https://www.acep.org/patient-care/policy-statements/freestanding-emergency-departments/ (accessed October 6, 2023).

Google Scholar

52. Leong MQ, Lim CW, Lai YF. Comparison of hospital-at-home models: a systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open. (2021) 11:e043285. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043285

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Hollander JE, Ranney ML, Carr BG. No patient left behind: patient-centered healthcare reform. Healthc. Transfor. (2016) 2016:115–119. doi: 10.1089/heat.2016.29016.hrc

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Staffan B. Community paramedicine. JEMS. (2015) 2015:9–11.

Google Scholar

55. Hollander JE, Sharma R. The availablists: emergency care without the emergency department. NEJM Catalyst. (2014). Available online at: https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.21.0310 (accessed October 6, 2023).

Google Scholar

Keywords: emergency, disaster, challenge, healthcare services, acute care

Citation: Chan TC (2023) Specialty grand challenge: emergency health services. Front. Disaster Emerg. Med. 1:1310474. doi: 10.3389/femer.2023.1310474

Received: 09 October 2023; Accepted: 21 November 2023;
Published: 11 December 2023.

Edited and reviewed by: Charles Cairns, Drexel University, United States

Copyright © 2023 Chan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Theodore C. Chan, dGNjaGFuJiN4MDAwNDA7aGVhbHRoLnVjc2QuZWR1

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.