This article is a correction to:
Qia’erdunbasixi Fe–Cu Deposit in Sawur, Xinjiang: A Case Study of Skarn Deposit Hosted by Volcanic Rock
Shuang Yang
Qiu-Shi Zhou1
Rui Wang- 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, and Institute of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China
- 2The Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, Ministry of Education, School of Earth and Space Science, Peking University, Beijing, China
A Corrigendum on
Qia’erdunbasixi Fe-Cu deposit in Sawur, Xinjiang: A case study of skarn deposit hosted by volcanic rock
by Yang S, Zhou Q-S, Wang R and Zhu Y (2022). Front. Earth Sci. 10:852261. doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.852261
In the published article, a citation of “Wang and Zhu, 2010” was erroneously missed. The citation has now been added in the caption of Figure 4. The updated caption can be seen below.
“FIGURE 4 | (A) Clinopyroxene is densely disseminated or presents as veinlets near the contact zone; (B) Magnetite is sparsely disseminated; (C) Magnetite veinlets; (D) Clinopyroxene is metasomatized by epidote + chlorite + magnetite, and epidotization and chloritization in the outer contact zone are well developed; (E–I) Alteration of quartz + magnetite + K-feldspar + calcite + sericite + chlorite + prehnite + actinolite + chalcopyrite + pyrite are developed in the hydrothermal stage; (F,G) Quartz-magnetite vein with a width of about 2∼10 cm, where magnetite accounts for as much as 40 vol.% of the vein volume; (J) Chalcopyrite is disseminated and magnetite is metasomatized by hematite; (K,L) Coarse K-feldspar grain, with inclusions of diopside formed in the early stage; (M) The calcite vein formed in the latest stage cuts through the early-stage magnetite; (N) Malachite in magnetite-quartz vein; (O) Wall rock of andesite is intensely mineralized with magnetite. Plane polarized light (A,E, M,O), cross polarized light (B–D,G–I,K,L,N), reflected light (J), BSE image (F). Ab—albite; Adr—andradite; Cal—calcite; Ccp—chalcopyrite; Chl—chlorite; Czo—clinozoisite; Di—diopside; Ep—epidote; Gl—glass; Hem—hematite; Mal—malachite; Mt—magnetite; Kfs—K-feldspar; Qtz—quartz; Sa—salite; Ser—sericite (modified after Wang and Zhu, 2010).”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: skarn, magnetite, syenite, Sawur, island arc, Fe-Cu deposit
Citation: Yang S, Zhou Q-S, Wang R and Zhu Y (2022) Corrigendum: Qia’erdunbasixi Fe-Cu deposit in Sawur, Xinjiang: A case study of skarn deposit hosted by volcanic rock. Front. Earth Sci. 10:981906. doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.981906
Received: 29 June 2022; Accepted: 04 July 2022;
Published: 04 August 2022.
Edited and reviewed by:
Hassan Mirnejad, Miami University, United StatesCopyright © 2022 Yang, Zhou, Wang and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Rui Wang, cndAY3VnYi5lZHUuY24=; Yongfeng Zhu, eWZ6aHVAcGt1LmVkdS5jbg==