CORRECTION article

Front. Earth Sci., 11 July 2022

Sec. Structural Geology and Tectonics

Volume 10 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.953708

Corrigendum: New Paleomagnetic Constraints on the Early Cretaceous Paleolatitude of the Lhasa Terrane (Tibet)

  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System Science, Resources and Environment (TPESRE), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

  • 2. Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

  • 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

  • 4. Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States

  • 5. Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States

  • 6. Institute of Science and Technology Strategy, Jiangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanchang, China

In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 2 as published. In the “Reference” column, “Combined analysis with results from Li et al. (2016),” the citation should be Li Z. et al. (2017) instead of Li et al. (2016). The corrected Table 2 appears below.

TABLE 2

IDFormation/lithologyLocationAge (Ma)Slat (°N)Slong (°E)N (n)Plat (°N)Plong (°E)A95 (dp/dm)(°)Paleolat (°N)Field testReference
Cretaceous paleopoles for the Lhasa Terrane (29.5°N, 91.0°E)
TKR1Takena Fm. red bedsLinzhouK2, 83 ± 1729.991.27 (68)683406.7/11.619.9 ± 6.7F, DPozzi et al. (1982)
TKR2Takena Fm. red bedsLinzhouK2, 83 ± 1729.991.26 (57)643485.6/9.520.9 ± 5.6FWestphal et al. (1983)
SXVShexing Fm. volcanic rocksLinzhouK2, 83 ± 1729.991.221 (132)69.1191.73.3/5.423.7 ± 3.3FTan et al. (2010)
SXR1Shexing Fm. red bedsLinzhouK2, 83 ± 1729.991.243 (377)70.2300.51.4/2.711.9 ± 1.4F, DTan et al. (2010)
WRGWoronggou Fm. volcanic rocksDeqingK1, ∼11430.590.115 (88)66.4220.36.913.3 ± 6.9noSun et al. (2008)
SXR2Shexing Fm. red bedsMaxiangK2, 83 ± 1729.990.717 (111)71.9327.24.518.5 ± 4.5FSun et al. (2012)
TKR3Takena Fm. red bedsBardaK2, 83 ± 1731.791.56 (49)63.5325.46.512.4 ± 6.5FAchache et al. (1984)
TKR4Takena Fm. red bedsLinzhouK2, 83 ± 1729.991.18 (61)71.2288.47.911.4 ± 7.9FAchache et al. (1984)
ZCZenong Gp volcanic rocksCuoqen120 ± 1031.3851858.2341.94.615.6 ± 4.6F, RChen et al. (2012)
DJDuoai Fm. lava flow and Jiega Fm. limestoneZuozuo114.5 ± 1.532.2280.431969.1319.84.814.8 ± 4.8F, RBian et al. (2017)
LZZLinzizong Gp volcanic rocksCuoqen96 ± 330.685.210 (82)65.2222.35.111.9 ± 5.1FTang et al. (2013)
QSQushenla Fm./lava flowsYanhu126 ± 632.382.651 (444)61.4192.92.120.3 ± 2.1F, DMa et al. (2014)
DNDuoni Fm. volcanic rocks and redbedsNagqv120.2 ± 0.531.391.919 (139)66.9281.26.16.7 ± 6.1F, DLi Z. et al. (2017)
ZGZonggei Fm./volcanic rocksNagqv112 ± 231.4892.19 (59)72.0252.66.712.3 ± 6.7noThis study
ZG+DNZonggei and Duoni formations/volcanics + sedimentsNagqv115 ± 531.4892.120 (144)70.3270.55.29.8 ± 5.2F, DCombined analysis with results from Li Z. et al. (2017)
 TK5Takena Fm. red-bedsLinzhouK2, 83 ± 1729.991.28 (51)682793.5/6.97.7 ± 3.5FLin and Watts (1988)
 JZSJingzhushan Fm. red-bedsDingqingK2, 83 ± 1731.2295.9815 (150)71.4273.15.210.9 ± 5.2FTong, et al. (2017)
 LRLava flow and red bedsLinzhou71.5 ± 3.529.991.121 (164)70.5269.64.910.0 ± 4.9F, RCao et al. (2017)
 SVVolcanic rocksShiquanhe92.4 ± 0.932.3480.0310 (78)64.12099.615.3 ± 9.6F, RYi et al. (2015)
 CLCChalicuo Gp, volcanic rocksYa're79.6 ± 0.731.5682.2415 (136)68.4298.82.710.0 ± 2.7FYi et al. (2015)
JZSCUpper Cretaceous Jingzhushan Fm. sedimentsCuoqinK2, 83 ± 1731.1384.863363.5324.92.1/3.912.2 ± 2.1FYang et al. (2015)
 DZCDianzhong Fm., volcanicsCuoqin119.0 ± 2.031.1284.381270.5292.97.411.2 ± 7.4FYang et al. (2015)
Pre-Cretaceous paleopoles for the Lhasa Terrane (29.5°N, 91.0°E)
 SVSangri Gp, volcanic rocksSangri County∼180 Ma29.392.056051.7305.93.4−3.2 ± 3.4F, DLi et al. (2016)
DCS1Dibu Co Lake, sedimentsCoqin areaT1-2, 244.5 ± 7.5 Ma30.984.78 (25)16.6204.65.6−11.1 ± 5.6F, RZhou et al. (2016)
DCS2Dibu Co Lake, sedimentsCoqin areaT3, 219 ± 18 Ma30.984.76 (37)19.72114.7−14.1 ± 4.7FZhou et al. (2016)
Cenozoic paleopoles for the Lhasa Terrane (29.5°N, 91.0°E)
LZZV1Linzizong Gp, volcanic rocksLinzhou54 ± 629.991.18 (46)71.5300.16.4/11.913.0 ± 6.4F, DAchache et al. (1984)
 LZZTLinzizong, Gp, tuffMendui∼5530.190.914 (99)73.6274.37.313.1 ± 7.3F, DSun et al. (2010)
 PNTPana Fm., tuffLinzhou41.5 ± 1.53091.29 (76)87.182.65.732.4 ± 5.7FTan et al. (2010)
LZZV2Linzizong Gp, volcanic rocksLinzhou62 ± 23091.22066.4262.56.36.1 ± 6.3F, DChen et al. (2010); Chen et al. (2014)
LZZV3Linzizong Gp, volcanic rocksLinzhou55 ± 53091.21369.7268.66.39.2 ± 6.3F, DChen et al. (2010); Chen et al. (2014)
LZZV4Linzizong Gp, volcanic rocksLinzhou47 ± 33091.21869.1234.25.612.2 ± 5.6F, DChen et al. (2010); Chen et al. (2014)
DykeLLinzizong Gp, dykesLinzhou∼533091.19 (63)72225.55.816.2 ± 5.8DLiebke et al. (2010)
LZZV3Linzizong Gp, volcanic rocksLinzhou50.5 ± 3.53091.124 (195)77.6211.35.022.7 ± 5.0F, DDupont-Nibet et al. (2010)
 LZVSLinzizong Gp, volcanics and sedimentsLinzhou52 ± 83091.223 (148)70.62815.310.4 ± 5.3F, DChen et al. (2010)
 PVSPana Fm., volcanics and sedimentsLinzhou48.5 ± 5.53091.2(119)68.42431.910.1 ± 1.9DHuang et al. (2013)
 CJDUpper Cuojiangding Gp, sedimentsZhongba50 ± 1629.984.3(62)783295.922.7 ± 5.9FMeng et al. (2012)
DZV2Member II, Dianzhong Fm., volcanicsLinzhou62 ± 23091.235 (228)65.8254.14.46.2 ± 4.4CChen et al. (2010); Chen et al. (2014); Huang et al. (2015); Yi et al. (2017)
Cretaceous-Cenozoic paleopoles for the Tethyan-Himalayan Terrane (29.5°N, 91.0°E)
 ZP1Zongpu Fm., limestoneGamba, Duela59 ± 428.388.514 (113)65.4277.63.8/7.65.0 ± 3.8FPatzelt et al. (1996)
 ZP2Zongpu Fm., marine sedimentsGamba60.5 ± 1.528.388.518 (171)67.3266.33.56.9 ± 3.5FYi et al. (2011)
 ZP3Zongpu Fm., marine sedimentsGamba57.5 ± 1.528.388.514 (141)71.6277.82.511.2 ± 2.5FYi et al. (2011)
 ZSZongshan Fm., limestoneGamba, Duela68 ± 328.388.514 (156)55.8261.44.4/8.6−4.3 ± 4.4FPatzelt et al. (1996)
2889.2
 SMSangdanlin and Mubala sectionsSaga60.85 ± 1.6529.385.3(86)74278.52.513.6 ± 2.5F, RYuan et al. (2020)
 CABCailangba A and B sectionsGyangze75.1 ± 1.128.989.2(127)40.8256.31.8−18.4 ± 1.8RYuan et al. (2020)
 SDSangdanlin Fm., marine depositsZhongba107.4 ± 13.529.78412 (53)25285.74.8/7.1−33.7 ± 4.8RQin et al. (2019)
SAXVSangxiu Fm., volcanic rocksLangkazi129.5 ± 5.528.891.326 (216)−5.93086.1−47.9 ± 6.1F, RMa et al. (2016)
 LKVLakang Fm., volcanic rocksCuona132.5 ± 1.528.192.431 (225)−26.8315.25.7−51.2 ± 5.7F, RYang et al. (2015)
ZLWMZhela and Weimei formations, volcanic rocksZhuode136.5 ± 1.528.991.331(219)0.9293.47−52.8 ± 7.0F,RBian et al. (2019)
 TDSThakkhola-Dzong Fm., sedimentsDzong∼11828.883.8(95)122896.0/7.5−45.0 ± 6.0Klootwijk and Bingham (1980)
Cretaceous paleopoles for the Indian shield (29.5°N, 91.0°E)
 RT1Rajmahal Traps, volcanic rocksRajmahal Traps117.5 ± 0.524.2–25.387.4–87.825 (158)72974.5/6−45.8 ± 4.5DKlootwijk, (1971)
 RT2Rajmahal Traps, volcanic rocksRajmahal Traps117.5 ± 0.524.2–25.387.4–87.834 (120)9.4296.63.0/3.7−43.9 ± 3.0DRao and Rao (1996)

Summary of Cretaceous and Early Cenozoic paleomagnetic poles from the Lhasa and Tethyan-Himalayan (two are from interior of Indian craton) terranes.

In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 10 as published. The selected reference site appearing in the top-right corner of the figure should read “Reference site (29.5°N, 91.0°E)” instead of “Reference site: 29.7°N, 91.0°E.” The corrected Figure 10 appears below.

FIGURE 10

In the original article, the reference for Li Z. et al. (2017) was incorrectly written as “Li, Z., Ding, L., Song, P., Fu, J., and Yue, Y. (2017d). Paleomagnetic Constraints on the Paleolatitude of the Lhasa Block during the Early Cretaceous: Implications for the Onset of India-Asia Collision and Latitudinal Shortening Estimates across Tibet and Stable Asia. Gondwana Res. 41, 352–372. doi: 10.1016j.gr.2015.05.013.” Instead, it should be “Li, Z., Ding, L., Song, P., Fu, J., and Yue, Y. (2017). Paleomagnetic Constraints on the Paleolatitude of the Lhasa Block during the Early Cretaceous: Implications for the Onset of India-Asia Collision and Latitudinal Shortening Estimates across Tibet and Stable Asia. Gondwana Res. 41, 352–372. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2015.05.013.”

In the original article, the reference for Qasim et al. (2018) was not cited. The citation has now been inserted in Section 8 Discussion, “Sub-section 8.2 Implications to Timing of Initial India-Asia Collision,” Paragraph 14:

“Recently, scientists have studied the timing of initial India-Asia collision from the perspectives of biostratigraphic constraints and sedimentary records (DeCelles et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2014; Hu et al., 2015, 2016a; Qasim et al., 2018; Wei et al., 2020).”

In the original article, there was an error in the text. The authors mistakenly wrote “7,100 ± 530 km” and “6,400 ± 550 km” as “7,100 ± 540 km” and “6,400 ± 560 km”. A correction has been made to the Section Highlights, point 3:

“The Neo-Tethys Ocean reached its maximum N-S width of 7,100 ± 530 km at ∼132 Ma and shrank to 6,400 ± 550 km at ∼115 Ma.”

In the original article, there was an error. The authors mistakenly wrote “lower” as “higher.” A correction has been made to Section 5 Magnetic Mineralogy and Petrography, “Sub-section 5.1.2 Temperature Dependence of the Magnetic Susceptibility Measurements,” Paragraph 1:

“Moreover, all samples show that the heating curves are significantly lower than the cooling curves.”

In the original article, there was an error. The authors wrongly cited the reference citation of Li et al. (2016). A correction has been made to Section 8 Discussion, “Sub-section 8.2 Implications to Timing of Initial India-Asia Collision,” Paragraph 12:

“Thus, given the originality of this batch of paleomagnetic data set, it is clear that we also demonstrate the robustness of the previously obtained paleomagnetic results from the Duoni Fm. volcano-sedimentary rocks (Li Z. et al., 2017).”

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Reference

  • 1

    LiZ.DingL.SongP.FuJ.YueY. (2017). Paleomagnetic Constraints on the Paleolatitude of the Lhasa Block during the Early Cretaceous: Implications for the Onset of India-Asia Collision and Latitudinal Shortening Estimates across Tibet and Stable Asia. Gondwana Res.41, 352372. 10.1016/j.gr.2015.05.013

Summary

Keywords

Lhasa terrane, India-Asia collision, Neo-Tethys ocean, paleolatitude, geochronology, intracontinental crustal shortening

Citation

Li Z, Ding L, Laskowski AK, Burke WB, Chen Y, Song P, Yue Y and Xie J (2022) Corrigendum: New Paleomagnetic Constraints on the Early Cretaceous Paleolatitude of the Lhasa Terrane (Tibet). Front. Earth Sci. 10:953708. doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.953708

Received

26 May 2022

Accepted

09 June 2022

Published

11 July 2022

Volume

10 - 2022

Edited and reviewed by

Derek Keir, University of Southampton, United Kingdom

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Zhenyu Li,

This article was submitted to Structural Geology and Tectonics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics