Xiujia Huan
Zhenhua Deng
Zhiqing Zhou4
Houyuan Lu- 1Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Beijing, China
- 2Center for the Study of Chinese Archaeology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- 3School of Archaeology and Museology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- 4Chengdu Municipal Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Chengdu, China
- 5School of History, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- 6Museum of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Xichang, China
- 7College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
The Zang-Yi Corridor is of pivotal significance for the interactions between northwest China, southwest China, and mainland Southeast Asia. It has been hypothesized that the formation of mixed farming in this region and its surrounding areas was based on multiple waves of crop dispersal, with foxtail millet and broomcorn millet arriving first from northwest China around 5,300 cal. BP and rice from middle Yangtze valley after 4,700 cal. BP. Based on the systematic sampling and direct dating conducted at the Guijiabao site, Sichuan Province, this study demonstrates that by no later than 5,000 cal. BP, mixed farming had already emerged in the south part of Zang-Yi corridor, which was much earlier than expected before. With this new evidence, it is argued that the transformation into farming in Southwest China was based on the dispersal of a crop package comprising foxtail millet, broomcorn millet, and rice instead of different waves of introduction. A further comparison of all archaeobotanical data in this region revealed that crop patterns varied significantly between different sites because of their diverse environmental conditions.
Introduction
The emergence of agriculture is of profound significance in human history, as it brought thorough change to the lifestyle of human beings and set a solid economic foundation for the further progress of human societies (Childe, 1936; Bellwood, 2005; Bellwood, 2013; Fuller and Stevens, 2019). However, the transformation into farming for most parts of the world was counted on the diffusion of domesticated plants and related technologies (Bellwood, 2013; Fuller and Lucas, 2017), as the origin of agriculture only happened in limited centers around the world (Diamond, 2002; Fuller, 2010). Continued interactions and exchanges between these independent agriculture origin centers brought local and exotic crops together, enabling a more diverse dietary and stable crop production to support a larger population (Jones et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2016). Hence, the study of agricultural diffusion is of crucial significance to our understanding of ancient social development and interregional communications.
With two distinct agricultural systems, China is a key center for the investigation of agriculture origins (Fuller et al., 2014; Larson et al., 2014; Lu, 2017). Early farming practice in northern China was based on local domestication of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) and broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum) (Lu et al., 2009a; Yang et al., 2012), while in southern China, especially the middle and lower Yangtze Valley, rice (Oryza sativa) had been domesticated no later than 8,500 cal. BP and cultivated as a staple crop since then (Deng et al., 2015; Zuo et al., 2017; Huan et al., 2021). In this case, the agriculturalization of other regions was all realized through population expansion and agriculture dispersal from these two centers. With the progress in archaeological research over the past decades, it has become increasingly evident that the southward dispersal of agriculture in China was mainly along three main routes, among which the Zang-Yi Corridor is of critical significance in subsistence transformation and social development in southwest China, including the Chengdu Plain, the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, and the Tibetan Plateau (He et al., 2017; Deng et al., 2018; Gao et al., 2021). Further influence of this route could even have reached mainland Southeast Asia and joined the long-distance communications along the southern foothills of the Himalayan Mountains with south Asia and beyond (Gao et al., 2020). Therefore, many researchers have been dedicated to investigating the dispersal and development of farming in this region.
To date, the earliest evidence of agriculture in the Zang-Yi Corridor is from the Yingpanshan site on the northern edge of this region. Large amounts of foxtail millet and broomcorn millet have been recovered there and traced back to ca. 5,300 cal. BP (Zhao and Chen, 2011). Typological comparisons of pottery from this site revealed the strong influence of contemporary Majiayao culture in the Gansu province. Hence, it is widely believed that these earliest Neolithic populations migrated from northwest China. A detailed chemical composition analysis of painted pottery from Yingpanshan also supports close interactions between local people and the Majiayao communities (Hung, 2011). Whereas, plant remains from many later sites of southwest China all suggest a mixed pattern of crop assemblages, comprising foxtail millet, broomcorn millet, and rice (Guo, 2011; Huang et al., 2011; Yan et al., 2013; Jin et al., 2014; Jiang et al., 2016a; Jiang et al., 2016b; Dal Martello et al., 2018). Among these discoveries, the earliest evidence came from Guiyuanqiao and Baodun, where rice was directly dated to ca. 4,700 cal. BP (Guedes et al., 2013; Guedes and Wan, 2015).
In this regard, it is hypothesized that the formation of mixed farming in southwest China is based on two waves of agricultural dispersal: first from northwest China with the introduction of foxtail millet and broomcorn millet around 5,300 cal. BP, and second from the middle Yangtze valley with the introduction of rice after 4,700 cal. BP (Guedes et al., 2013). However, this speculation is still debatable for two reasons. Firstly, whether the earliest crop pattern only consists of foxtail millet and broomcorn millet or the entire package of millets and rice is still ambiguous, as there is no evidence from other contemporary sites of Yingpanshan. Secondly, no evidence reveals interregional communications between the middle Yangtze Valley and Southwest China prior to 4,500 cal. BP (Jiang et al., 2020), making the speculated introduction of rice from the middle Yangtze valley questionable. Therefore, a more targeted study should be conducted at these early sites in the region to test or modify this model.
Here, we report the systematic phytolith analysis at the Guijiabao site in Sichuan Province. The new results, along with radiocarbon dating, reveal mixed farming had already emerged in the southern part of the Zang-Yi Corridor no later than 5,000 cal. BP, which is much earlier than expected before. With this new discovery, it is quite possible that all these crops, including foxtail millet, broomcorn millet, and rice, were introduced into this region as a package, and the source of agriculture introduction into this region should also be re-examined, especially the possibility of middle Yangtze valley.
Materials and Methods
Sample Collection
The Guijiabao site (101.6°E, 27.45°N) (Figure 1) is situated in the Yanyuan County of Sichuan Province and is surrounded by the middle part of the Hengduan Mountains (Zhong et al., 2016; Hao et al., 2022). As a crossroad in the southern part of the Zang-Yi Corridor, this region has played a crucial role in interregional interactions along this route. Guijiabao was first discovered in 2015, and a systematic field survey and small-scale excavation were conducted to confirm the preservation conditions and major remains in the site. Subsequently, excavations were carried out in three seasons from 2016 to 2018.
FIGURE 1. Location of the Guijiabao site (red triangle) and other sites mentioned in the study. 1-Yingpanshan, 2-Guiyuanqiao, 3-Baodun, 4-Gaopo, 5-Henglanshan, 6-Shapingzhan, 7-Yubeidi, 8-Dadunzi, 9-Baiyangcun, 10-Haimenkou, 11-Shilinggang, 12-Shifodong, 13-Xueshan, 14-Guangfentou, 15-Heposuo,16-Xishanping, 17-Baligang.
According to archaeological investigations, the total area of Guijiabao is around 30,000 m2, but cultural deposits have been heavily disturbed by modern activities. Even though, a large number of ancient ruins have been unearthed, including house foundations, pits, tombs, and many artifacts such as pottery, stone tools, and spindle whorls (Hao et al., 2022). All of these remains could be grouped into three periods, namely: Neolithic, Bronze Age, and historical period, among which the Neolithic remains could further be divided into two phases. According to the result of systematic radiocarbon dating at the site (Table 1), Phase I of the Neolithic period at this site occurred around 5,000–4,500 cal. BP, and Phase II around 4,500–3,700 cal. BP. Moreover, the beginning of human activities in this period probably could reach 5,300 cal. BP as revealed by radiocarbon dates of foxtail millet grains from context H1 and broomcorn millet grains from context TN22E39②. The date of the Bronze Age remains at the site is roughly 3,200–2,700 cal. BP, where a hiatus of 500 years after the Neolithic period could be observed. Historical relics occurred much later, mainly stretching from the late Northern Song dynasty to the Ming dynasty (ca. 1,200–500 cal. BP).
TABLE 1. AMS Radiocarbon dating results of Neolithic contexts from the Guijiabao site. All dates were calibrated by OxCal v4.4.4, using the IntCal 20 Atmospheric curve (Reimer et al., 2020).
In order to detect Neolithic agriculture practices at the Guijiabao site, soil samples for phytolith analysis have been collected during the excavations. In total, 154 samples from the Neolithic period were obtained, of which 16 were from Phase I and 138 from Phase II (details in Supplementary Table S1). These sampled contexts cover different types of archaeological features of the site, including cultural layers (sample codes start with T), pits (sample codes start with H), house foundations (sample codes start with F), and ditches (sample codes start with G).
Phytolith Extraction and Identification
Phytoliths were extracted from soil samples according to established methods (Piperno, 1988; Lu et al., 2002) with minor modifications. Initially, approximately 2 g of each sample was weighed and treated with 30% H2O2 and 15% HCl to remove organic matter and carbonate. The samples were then subjected to heavy liquid flotation using ZnBr2 (density, 2.35 g/cm3) to separate the phytoliths, which were subsequently mounted on a slide using Canada Balsam. After air-drying, the phytoliths on the slide were counted and identified using a Leica microscope at ×400 magnification. More than 400 phytolith particles in each sample were identified and recorded according to previously published references and criteria (Wang and Lu, 1993; Lu et al., 2006; Lu et al., 2007; Lu et al., 2009b; Ge et al., 2018; Ge et al., 2020a; Ge et al., 2020b). In particular, for samples with rice phytoliths, the slides were scanned until 50 rice bulliform phytoliths with clear and countable scales were observed to calculate the proportion of rice bulliform phytoliths with ≥9 scales (Wang and Lu, 2012; Huan et al., 2015; Huan et al., 2020).
Results
All 154 samples yielded abundant phytoliths. In total, 26 phytolith morphotypes were identified, of which five were confirmed from crops, including double-peaked, bulliform, and parallel-bilobate types from rice, η-type epidermal long cell phytoliths from the upper lemma and palea of broomcorn millet, and Ω-type from foxtail millet (Figure 2). Other main phytolith types include elongate psilate, square, rondel, hair cell, rectangle, bilobate, elongate echinate, bulliform, and long saddle.
FIGURE 2. Crop phytoliths obtained from the Guijiabao site. (A–D): broomcorn millet η-type; (E–H): foxtail millet Ω-type; (I,J): rice parallel bilobate; (K,L): rice double-peaked; (M): rice double-peaked (blue arrow) and broomcorn millet η-type (orange arrow); (N,O): rice bulliform with <9 scales; (P–R): rice bulliform with ≥9 scales (scale bar = 20 μm).
Phytolith assemblages in the Guijiabao site were characterized by high proportions of elongate psilate, elongate echinate, square, rectangle, rondel, hair cell, and bilobate, along with a low proportion of rice and a relatively lower proportion of broomcorn millet morphotypes (Figure 3; Supplementary Table S1). Foxtail millet phytoliths appeared in Phase II, but their proportions were much lower than those of broomcorn millet and rice (Figure 3). It is also worth noting that the phytolith assemblage of Phase II was characterized by the presence of double-peaked types of rice husk, revealing a strong relationship between cultural deposits in these contexts and rice dehusking activities at the site (Harvey and Fuller, 2005). The presence of bulliform and parallel-bilobate types from rice leaves and stems also demonstrates local cultivation of rice.
FIGURE 3. Percentage diagram of major phytolith types at the Guijiabao site. Sample code in Supplementary Table S1.
Based on the preservation conditions, 139 samples were selected for further analysis of scales on the edge of rice bulliform phytoliths, including 14 from Phase I and 125 from Phase II (Figure 3; Supplementary Table S1). For each sample, at least 50 bulliform phytoliths with clear and countable scales were carefully observed. The average proportion of bulliform phytoliths with ≥9 scales was 49.40 ± 4.44% in Phase I and 50.63 ± 4.63% in Phase II.
Discussion
The Emergence of Mixed Farming in Southwest China
The Zang-Yi Corridor is a significant channel for interregional communications and human movements in southwest China during historical and modern times (Fei, 1980). Archaeological investigations in the past decades further suggest that cultural interactions, population migration, and the flow of raw materials and technologies along this route started much earlier than previously thought (Huo, 2005). The Neolithization process of the entire southwest region was based on the introduction of these innovations and possible human migrations, among which the emergence of agriculture was no doubt in the central place.
The new data presented in this study clearly show that abundant rice bulliform phytoliths were present in all samples from Phase I (5,000–4,500 cal. BP) at the Guijiabao site, together with the typical η-type phytoliths of broomcorn millet. A detailed analysis of scales on the edge of rice bulliform phytoliths suggested that the proportion of rice bulliform phytoliths with ≥9 scales in Phase I was 49.40 ± 4.44% (Figure 3), which was close to Phase II level (50.63 ± 4.63%) and modern domesticated rice (Huan et al., 2015; Huan et al., 2020). Considering the current AMS radiocarbon dates of this phase, especially one direct date of rice grain (BA170249, 5,030–4,856 cal. BP, 95.4% probability), these lines of evidence could confirm that rice had already been cultivated together with broomcorn millet in the southern part of Zang-Yi Corridor prior to 5,000 cal. BP.
The continuation of this mixed farming strategy could be demonstrated by crop assemblages from Phase II (4,500–3,700 cal. BP) of Guijiabao, when phytoliths of rice, broomcorn millet, and foxtail millet were found together in nearly all samples (Figure 3). A comparison of these phytoliths revealed that their proportions varied greatly among different samples, but generally rice and broomcorn millet were more important than foxtail millet. Nevertheless, given the different preservation conditions of these phytoliths, the specific crop pattern needs to be further confirmed by other evidence, such as macroscopic plant remains and stable isotope analyses of human bones. Another point that needs to be clarified here is the absence of foxtail millet phytoliths in all samples of Phase I in this study, which may have resulted from the relatively poor preservation conditions of foxtail millet phytoliths, as foxtail millet grains have been recovered in this phase and directly dated (Table 1). Another possible reason is that the samples from Phase I in this study were limited.
Overall, the present study clearly suggests that rice was cultivated together with foxtail millet and broomcorn millet from 5,000 cal. BP to 3,700 cal. BP at the Guijiabao site. Along with discoveries from other sites, it could be confirmed that they were introduced simultaneously as a package into the Zang-Yi Corridor and then other parts of southwest China at the very beginning of the Neolithic period in the region, which differs from the previously assumed process of multiple waves of crop introduction (d’Alpoim Guedes, 2011). Actually, the pure millet crop pattern of Yingpanshan, which is the main evidence of the previous model, is also questionable. The absence of rice at the Yingpanshan site might have resulted from insufficient sampling, as only 45 L of soil samples from nine contexts were processed (Zhao and Chen, 2011). Another piece of evidence in support of this query is that stable isotope analysis of human bones from two contexts of Yingpanshan indicated that their long-term diets after childhood consisted of both C3 and C4 foods instead of pure C4 millets (Lee et al., 2020). In this case, these lines of evidence all tend to support a dispersal of crop package including foxtail millet, broomcorn millet and rice into this region.
On the other hand, the hypothesis that the middle Yangtze region as the source of rice for Southwest China is also unreliable, as no evidence supports the early communication between these two regions prior to 4,500 cal. BP. Even around 4,000 cal. BP, except for the sparse traits of pottery styles that are speculated to be influenced by the middle Yangtze region, no other evidence has been found (Jiang et al., 2020). In contrast, the southern part of Gansu Province is not a pure millet farming region as assumed before. Previous studies have shown that mixed farming has been carried out in many regions of Northern China since 7,500 cal. BP (Zhang et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018), and the westernmost discovery was at the Xishanping site of Gansu Province, where charred seeds and phytoliths of foxtail millet, broomcorn millet, and rice have been dated back to 5,300–4,800 cal. BP (Li et al., 2007a; Li et al., 2007b). Plant remains from a regional survey in the Li County of southern Gansu also found rice grains in three sites (Ji, 2007). Therefore, it is quite possible that mixed farming was practiced at many sites in the southern part of Gansu province, and the crop package of millets and rice in southwest China was introduced from this region at the same time.
From a broader view, another possible region related to the emergence of mixed farming in Southwest China is the upper Han River valley, where mixed farming should also have been practiced prior to the Yangshao period, referring to the discoveries in the middle Han River Valley (Deng et al., 2015). Typological comparisons of pottery from the Luojiaba site in the Jialing River valley revealed influences of the Yangshao culture in the upper Han River valley (Li, 2018), thus this channel may serve as another parallel dispersal route in the eastern part of the Sichuan Basin. To clarify the emergence of mixed farming in Southwest China, more targeted research in these regions is needed in the future.
Crop Patterns and Regional Diversity in the Zang-Yi Corridor of Southwest China
With the flow of populations and emergence of innovative technologies, the adoption, adaptation, and integration of exotic elements has been a unique cultural feature of the Zang-Yi Corridor, which could also be observed in the farming strategies. The mixed cropping system has been widely practiced not only in the Neolithic Age, but also in later periods, owing to its complex ground features and environmental conditions. There are seven mountains and six large rivers in the Hengduan Mountainous region, which can be divided into 13 geomorphological zones, covering 19 climatic zones from the tropical zone to plateau frigid zone (Li, 1989; Zhang, 1989). The flexibility of farming practices is clearly reflected in the regional diversity and chronological changes in the cropping systems of this region.
During the Neolithic Period (ca. 5,300–3,600 cal. BP), although foxtail millet, broomcorn millet, and rice were widely cultivated in most sites, the proportion of each crop varied considerably among the four sites with systematic archaeobotanical work (Figure 4). Foxtail millet and broomcorn millet were cultivated at the Yingpanshan site and played almost equivalent roles in its farming system (Zhao and Chen, 2011). However, in Phase I of Baiyangcun (4,600–4,300 cal. BP), rice was undoubtedly dominant in the farming system, and foxtail millet was also important. Nevertheless, broomcorn millet only accounted for 2.21% of all crop remains (Dal Martello et al., 2018). This pattern is similar to that of Henglanshan, but plant remains of this site are too limited, and the data are not sufficiently representative (Jiang et al., 2016a; Jiang et al., 2016b). In Phases II and III of Baiyangcun (4,200–4,050 cal. BP), a noticeable change occurred when foxtail millet became the most important crop, followed by rice. The Dadunzi site in Yunnan Province (4,000–3,600 cal. BP) presented a different pattern dominated by foxtail millet, where broomcorn millet was also important. However, the proportion of rice was relatively low (Jin et al., 2014). In addition, wild soybeans were also found at Yingpanshan and Baiyangcun during this period, which was possibly utilized on a small scale.
FIGURE 4. Diachronic charts of crop patterns in the Zang-Yi Corridor of southwest China.
Archaeobotanical evidence from the early phase of Bronze Age (ca. 3,600–2,800 cal. BP) was more limited as macroscopic plant remains were only recovered from four sites. Unlike the previous period, rice was the main cereal crop in all these sites, accounting for 62.5 to 97.7% of all crop remains. The proportion of foxtail millet in the early phase of Haimenkou was more than 22.88% (Xue, 2010; Xue et al., 2022), but less than 5% in Shifodong and Shapingzhan (Zhao, 2010; Yan et al., 2016b). Broomcorn millet was very rare during this period, with only one grain from Gaopo and two grains from Haimenkou reported (Xue, 2010; Jiang et al., 2013). Another significant change in farming practices of this period is the adoption of wheat and barley, as indicated by the plant remains from Haimenkou, where 261 wheat and seven barley grains have been found. Although wheat and barley were dispersed into the northwestern part of Xinjiang around 5,000 cal. BP (Zhou et al., 2020), the earliest evidence in the Hexi Corridor was only approximately 4,000 cal. BP (Dodson et al., 2013) and 3,600 cal. BP in Central China (Deng et al., 2020). Therefore, the mountainous area of the Zang-Yi Corridor was one of the earliest regions to adopt wheat and barley in southern China. By contrast, no solid evidence of wheat has been reported in the contemporary Chengdu Plain. Cannabis and buckwheat were also found in Haimenkou, revealing more diversified crop patterns since early Bronze Age.
During the late Bronze Age (ca. 2,800–2000 cal. BP), the importance of wheat was greatly improved, which has been found in nearly all sites except for Shilinggang, and is dominant in the crop assemblages of Haimenkou, Guangfentou, and Xueshan (Xue, 2010; Li et al., 2016; Li and Liu, 2016; Wang et al., 2019). Even though, the specific crop patterns at these sites were still different from each other. Foxtail millet was the secondary important crop in the late phase of Haimenkou, with rice and broomcorn millet accounting for a small portion of the entire assemblage (Xue, 2010; Xue et al., 2022). However, in the three phases of Guangfentou and Xueshan, the proportion of rice is much higher than that of foxtail millet (Li and Liu, 2016; Wang et al., 2019). In addition, plant remains from Heposuo and Yubeidi both demonstrated a rice-dominated crop pattern, and the proportions of foxtail millet and rice were slightly different from each other (Yang et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2021). In contrast, broomcorn millet, barley, and soybean were only sparsely found at these sites, which could possibly be used as risk-buffering crops by the locals.
Overall, a comparison of crop patterns from all sites in the different periods of the Zang-Yi Corridor clearly demonstrates that mixed farming and regional diversity are the main characteristics of the agricultural practices in the region. During the Neolithic period, foxtail millet, broomcorn millet, and rice were all staple crops, although their proportions greatly varied in different sites. With the introduction of wheat in approximately 3,600 cal. BP, this exotic crop became the most fundamental crop along with foxtail millet and rice in the Bronze Age, while broomcorn millet was only discovered sparsely and accounted for a low proportion. The conditions were similar for the newly introduced barley. Soybeans, cannabis, and buckwheat have also been utilized on a small scale by local people, forming a more diversified crop pattern.
Conclusion
Based on systematic phytolith analysis and direct dating of plant remains from Guijiabao in the south part of the Zang-Yi Corridor, this study shed new light on our understanding of the emergence of farming practice in Southwest China. The new data demonstrated that prior to 5,000 cal. BP, rice, foxtail millet, and broomcorn millet were cultivated and consumed together at the Guijiabao site. With new evidence, the previous hypothesis on the dispersal of agriculture in Southwest China needs to be reconsidered. Rice should have been introduced into this region together with foxtail millet and broomcorn millet as a package around 5,000 cal. BP or even earlier, instead of from the two waves of dispersal from Northwest China and the middle Yangtze Valley, respectively. Plant remains from the late period of Guijiabao and comparison with archaeobotanical remains from other sites further revealed that mixed cropping systems had been widely practiced throughout the Neolithic and Bronze Age in the Zang-Yi corridor. Moreover, great regional diversity could be observed with specific crop patterns, which could have resulted from adaptation to complex ground features and environmental conditions. With the introduction of wheat around 3,600 cal. BP, local crop patterns became more complex, starting a new era in the history of agricultural development in this region.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author Contributions
XHu and ZD designed the study. ZD, ZZ, XY, XHa, and QB conducted archaeological excavation and sample collection. XHu, ZD, and HL completed sample processing and identification. XHu and ZD analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No.19BKG005), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41872027 and 41907372), National Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 2020YFC1521606), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB26000000).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.874649/full#supplementary-material
References
Bellwood, P. S. (2005). The First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies. Malden: Blackwell Pub.
Dal Martello, R., Min, R., Stevens, C., Higham, C., Higham, T., Qin, L., et al. (2018). Early Agriculture at the Crossroads of China and Southeast Asia: Archaeobotanical Evidence and Radiocarbon Dates from Baiyangcun, Yunnan. J. Archaeological Sci. Rep. 20, 711–721. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.06.005
d’Alpoim Guedes, J. (2011). Millets, rice, Social Complexity, and the Spread of Agriculture to the Chengdu Plain and Southwest China. Rice 4, 104–113. doi:10.1007/s12284-011-9071-1
Deng, Z., Fuller, D. Q., Chu, X., Cao, Y., Jiang, Y., Wang, L., et al. (2020). Assessing the Occurrence and Status of Wheat in Late Neolithic central China: the Importance of Direct AMS Radiocarbon Dates from Xiazhai. Veget Hist. Archaeobot 29, 61–73. doi:10.1007/s00334-019-00732-7
Deng, Z., Hung, H.-c., Fan, X., Huang, Y., and Lu, H. (2018). The Ancient Dispersal of Millets in Southern China: New Archaeological Evidence. The Holocene 28 (1), 34–43. doi:10.1177/0959683617714603
Deng, Z., Qin, L., Gao, Y., Weisskopf, A. R., Zhang, C., and Fuller, D. Q. (2015). From Early Domesticated Rice of the Middle Yangtze Basin to Millet, Rice and Wheat Agriculture: Archaeobotanical Macro-Remains from Baligang, Nanyang Basin, Central China (6700-500 BC). Plos One 10 (10), e0139885. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139885
Diamond, J. (2002). Evolution, Consequences and Future of Plant and Animal Domestication. Nature 418, 700–707. doi:10.1038/nature01019
Dodson, J. R., Li, X., Zhou, X., Zhao, K., Sun, N., and Atahan, P. (2013). Origin and Spread of Wheat in China. Quat. Sci. Rev. 72, 108–111. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.04.021
Fei, X. (1980). Distinguishment of Ethnic Groups in China. Social Sci. China 1, 147–162. (in Chinese).
Fuller, D. Q. (2010). An Emerging Paradigm Shift in the Origins of Agriculture. Gen. Anthropol. 17 (2), 1–12. doi:10.1111/j.1939-3466.2010.00010.x
Fuller, D. Q., Denham, T., Arroyo-Kalin, M., Lucas, L., Stevens, C. J., Qin, L., et al. (2014). Convergent Evolution and Parallelism in Plant Domestication Revealed by an Expanding Archaeological Record. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 (17), 6147–6152. doi:10.1073/pnas.1308937110
Fuller, D. Q., and Lucas, L. (2017). “Adapting Crops, Landscapes, and Food Choices: Patterns in the Dispersal of Domesticated Plants Across Eurasia,” in Human Dispersal and Species Movement: From Prehistory to the Present. Editor N. Boivin, R. Crassard, and M. Petraglia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 304–331.
Fuller, D. Q., and Stevens, C. J. (2019). Between Domestication and Civilization: the Role of Agriculture and Arboriculture in the Emergence of the First Urban Societies. Veget Hist. Archaeobot 28 (3), 263–282. doi:10.1007/s00334-019-00727-4
Gao, Y., Dong, G., Yang, X., and Chen, F. (2020). A Review on the Spread of Prehistoric Agriculture from Southern China to mainland Southeast Asia. Sci. China Earth Sci. 63 (5), 615–625. doi:10.1007/s11430-019-9552-5
Gao, Y., Yang, J., Ma, Z., Tong, Y., and Yang, X. (2021). New Evidence from the Qugong Site in the central Tibetan Plateau for the Prehistoric Highland Silk Road. The Holocene 31 (2), 230–239. doi:10.1177/0959683620941144
Ge, Y., Lu, H., Wang, C., and Gao, X. (2020a). Phytoliths in Selected Broad-Leaved Trees in China. Sci. Rep. 10 (1), 15577. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72547-w
Ge, Y., Lu, H., Zhang, J., Wang, C., and Gao, X. (2020b). Phytoliths in Inflorescence Bracts: Preliminary Results of an Investigation on Common Panicoideae Plants in China. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1736. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01736
Ge, Y., Lu, H., Zhang, J., Wang, C., He, K., and Huan, X. (2018). Phytolith Analysis for the Identification of Barnyard Millet (Echinochloa sp.) and its Implications. Archaeol Anthropol. Sci. 10 (1), 61–73. doi:10.1007/s12520-016-0341-0
Guedes, J. d. A., Jiang, M., He, K., Wu, X., and Jiang, Z. (2013). Site of Baodun Yields Earliest Evidence for the Spread of rice and Foxtail Millet Agriculture to South-West China. Antiquity 87, 758–771. doi:10.1017/s0003598x00049449
Guedes, J. D. A., and Wan, J. (2015). Flotation Results and Analysis on Guiyuanqiao Site in Shifang City, Sichuan. Sichuan Cult. Relics 5 (81–87), 94. (in Chinese).
Guo, F. (2011). The Excavation of Longwangmiao Site in Hanyuan County, Sichuan in 2009. East Asia Archaeology 3, 406–442. (in Chinese).
Hao, X., Zhou, Z., Liu, L., and Tian, J. (2022). The Neolithic Occupants in the Yanyuan Basin: Excavation of the Burials at the Guijiabao Site, Sichuan Province, Southwest China. Archaeological Res. Asia 29, 100341. doi:10.1016/j.ara.2021.100341
Harvey, E. L., and Fuller, D. Q. (2005). Investigating Crop Processing Using Phytolith Analysis: the Example of rice and Millets. J. Archaeological Sci. 32 (5), 739–752. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2004.12.010
He, K., Lu, H., Zhang, J., Wang, C., and Huan, X. (2017). Prehistoric Evolution of the Dualistic Structure Mixed rice and Millet Farming in China. The Holocene 27 (12), 1885–1898. doi:10.1177/0959683617708455
Huan, X., Lu, H., Jiang, L., Zuo, X., He, K., and Zhang, J. (2021). Spatial and Temporal Pattern of rice Domestication during the Early Holocene in the Lower Yangtze Region, China. The Holocene 31 (9), 1366–1375. doi:10.1177/09596836211019090
Huan, X., Lu, H., Wang, C., Tang, X., Zuo, X., Ge, Y., et al. (2015). Bulliform Phytolith Research in Wild and Domesticated Rice Paddy Soil in South China. Plos One 10 (10), e0141255. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141255
Huan, X., Lu, H., Wang, C., and Zhang, J. (2020). Progress of rice Bulliform Phytolith Research on Wild–Domesticated Characteristics. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 59 (4), 467–478. (in Chinese).
Huang, F., Guo, F., and Jin, P. (2011). The Discovery and its Significance of rice Phytoliths at Maiping Neolithic Site. Sichuan Cult. Relics, 79–83. (in Chinese).
Hung, L. (2011). Pottery Production, Mortuary Practice, and Social Complexity in the Majiayao Culture, NW China (Ca. 5300-4000 BP). St. Louis: Washington University.
Huo, T.-I., Huang, Y.-H., and Wu, J.-C. (2005). Percutaneous Ablation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Practice and Future Perspectives. J. Tibetology 68, 155–159. (in Chinese). doi:10.1016/s1726-4901(09)70239-4
Ji, D. (2007). Environmental Archaeological Perspective: Dispersal of Anatomically Modern Human and Origin of Agriculture in Northern China. PhD thesis. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University.
Jiang, M., Geng, P., Liu, L., and Zuo, Z. (2013). Flotation Results and Analysis on Gaopo Site in Mianning County in 2011. Archaeological Discoveries in Chengdu, 317–330. (in Chinese).
Jiang, M., Hu, T., Bu, Q., and Wang, H. (2016a). Flotation Results on Henglanshan Site in Xichang City in 2011 and 2013. Archaeological Res. Chengdu (3), 503–515. (in Chinese).
Jiang, M., Yan, X., Liu, X., Huang, Y., and Wang, H. (2016b). Flotation Results on Henglanshan Site in Xichang City in 2014. Archaeological Discoveries in Chengdu, 115–139. (in Chinese).
Jiang, Z., Wang, Y., and Zhang, Q. (2020). A Study on Pre-qin Archaeological Cultures in the Chengdu plain. Acta Archaeologica Sinica, 1–22. (in Chinese).
Jin, H., Liu, X., Min, R., Li, X., and Wu, X. (2014). Flotation Results and Analysis on Dadunzi Site in Yuanmou County, Yunnan. Jianghan Archaeology 3, 109–114. (in Chinese).
Jones, M., Hunt, H., Kneale, C., Lightfoot, E., Lister, D., Liu, X., et al. (2016). Food Globalisation in Prehistory: The Agrarian Foundations of an Interconnected Continent. Jba 4, 73–87. doi:10.5871/jba/004.073
Larson, G., Piperno, D. R., Allaby, R. G., Purugganan, M. D., Andersson, L., Arroyo-Kalin, M., et al. (2014). Current Perspectives and the Future of Domestication Studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 (17), 6139–6146. doi:10.1073/pnas.1323964111
Lee, C. Y., Lin, K. C., Chen, J., and Czermak, A. (2020). Dietary History of Two Human Individuals at the Yingpanshan Site, Sichuan Province, Revealed by Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope Analysis of Serial Samples of Dentinal Collagen. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol 30 (4), 565–574. doi:10.1002/oa.2871
Li, B. (1989). Geomorphologic Regionalization of the Hengduan Mountains Region. Mountain Res. 7 (1), 21–28. (in Chinese).
Li, H., Zuo, X., Kang, L., Ren, L., Liu, F., Liu, H., et al. (2016). Prehistoric Agriculture Development in the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, Southwest China: Archaeobotanical Evidence. Sci. China Earth Sci. 59 (8), 1562–1573. doi:10.1007/s11430-016-5292-x
Li, S. (2018). An Analysis and Speculation on the Sources of Prehistoric Remains from the Luojiaba Site. Sichuan Cult. Relics 3, 33–37. (in Chinese).
Li, X., and Liu, X. (2016). Flotation Results and Analysis on Gunagfentou Site in Jiangchuan, Yunnan. Agric. Archaeology 3, 20–27. (in Chinese).
Li, X., Zhou, X., Zhang, H., Zhou, J., Shang, X., and Dodson, J. (2007a). The Record of Cultivated rice from Archaeobiological Evidence in Northwestern China 5000 Years Ago. Chin. Sci Bull 52 (10), 1372–1378. doi:10.1007/s11434-007-0186-0
Li, X., Zhou, X., Zhou, J., Dodson, J., Zhang, H., and Shang, X. (2007b). The Earliest Archaeobiological Evidence of the Broadening Agriculture in China Recorded at Xishanping Site in Gansu Province. Sci. China Ser. D 50 (11), 1707–1714. doi:10.1007/s11430-007-0066-0
Liu, X., Reid, R. E., Lightfoot, E., Matuzeviciute, G. M., and Jones, M. K. (2016). Radical Change and Dietary Conservatism: Mixing Model Estimates of Human Diets along the Inner Asia and China's Mountain Corridors. The Holocene 26 (10), 1556–1565. doi:10.1177/0959683616646842
Lu, H., Liu, Z., Wu, N., Berné, S., Saito, Y., Liu, B., et al. (2002). Rice Domestication and Climatic Change: Phytolith Evidence from East China. Boreas 31 (4), 378–385. doi:10.1080/030094802320942581
Lu, H. (2017). New Methods and Progress in Research on the Origins and Evolution of Prehistoric Agriculture in China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 60 (12), 2141–2159. doi:10.1007/s11430-017-9145-2
Lu, H., Wu, N., Liu, K., Jiang, H., and Liu, T. S. (2007). Phytoliths as Quantitative Indicators for the Reconstruction of Past Environmental Conditions in China II: Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction in the Loess Plateau. Quat. Sci. Rev. 26 (5), 759–772. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.10.006
Lu, H., Wu, N., Yang, X., Jiang, H., Liu, K., and Liu, T. (2006). Phytoliths as Quantitative Indicators for the Reconstruction of Past Environmental Conditions in China I: Phytolith-Based Transfer Functions. Quat. Sci. Rev. 25 (9), 945–959. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.07.014
Lu, H., Zhang, J., Liu, K.-b., Wu, N., Li, Y., Zhou, K., et al. (2009a). Earliest Domestication of Common Millet (Panicum Miliaceum) in East Asia Extended to 10,000 Years Ago. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (18), 7367–7372. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900158106
Lu, H., Zhang, J., Wu, N., Liu, K.-b., Xu, D., and Li, Q. (2009b). Phytoliths Analysis for the Discrimination of Foxtail Millet (Setaria Italica) and Common Millet (Panicum Miliaceum). Plos One 4 (2), e4448. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004448
Piperno, D. R. (1988). Phytolith Analysis: An Archaeological and Geological Perspective. London: Academic Press.
Wang, C., Lu, H., Gu, W., Wu, N., Zhang, J., Zuo, X., et al. (2017). The Spatial Pattern of Farming and Factors Influencing it during the Peiligang Culture Period in the Middle Yellow River valley, China. Sci. Bull. 62 (23), 1565–1568. doi:10.1016/j.scib.2017.10.003
Wang, C., Lu, H., Gu, W., Zuo, X., Zhang, J., Liu, Y., et al. (2018). Temporal Changes of Mixed Millet and rice Agriculture in Neolithic-Bronze Age Central Plain, China: Archaeobotanical Evidence from the Zhuzhai Site. The Holocene 28 (5), 738–754. doi:10.1177/0959683617744269
Wang, C., and Lu, H. (2012). Research Progress of Fan-Shaped Phytolith of Rice and Relvent Issues. Quat. Sci. 32 (2), 269–281. (in Chinese).
Wang, Q., Jiang, Z., Yang, W., and Chen, X. (2019). Plant Remains from the Xueshan Site in Chengjiang County of Yunnan Province. Agric. Hist. China 2, 3–11. (in Chinese).
Wang, Y., and Lu, H. (1993). The Study of Phytolith and its Application. Beijing: China Ocean Press, 1–228.
Xue, Y. (2010). A Preliminary Investigation on the Archaeobotanical Material from the Site of Haimenkou in Jianchuan County. Master thesis. Beijing: Peking University, 1–157.
Xue, Y., Dal Martello, R., Qin, L., Stevens, C. J., Min, R., and Fuller, D. Q. (2022). Post-neolithic Broadening of Agriculture in Yunnan, China: Archaeobotanical Evidence from Haimenkou. Archaeological Res. Asia 30, 100364. doi:10.1016/j.ara.2022.100364
Yan, X., Guo, F., Wang, Y., and Guo, X. (2013). Flotation Results and Analysis on Zhengjiaba Site in Langzhong City, Sichuan-On the Carbonized Archaeobotanic Remains of Pre-qin Period in Sichuan Sichuan Cultural. Relics 4, 74–85. (in Chinese).
Yan, X., Jiang, M., Liu, X., Liu, L., Bu, Q., and Li, T. (2016a). The Report of Plant Remains Unearthed at the Sites of Guijiabao and Daozuomiao in Yanyuan County in 2015. Archaeological discoveries in Chengdu, 147–154. (in Chinese).
Yan, X., Jiang, M., Zuo, Z., and Bu, Q. (2016b). Flotation Results and Analysis on Shapingzhan Site in Xichang City in 2014. Archaeological Discoveries in Chengdu, 155–162+531532. (in Chinese).
Yang, W., Jiang, Z., and Chen, X. (2020). A Preliminary Study on Plant Remains from the Yubeidi Site. Agric. Hist. China 39 (1), 3–11. (in Chinese).
Yang, W., Jiang, Z., Yao, H., and Chen, X. (2021). A Study on Agriculture Structure in the Shizhaishan Period of Dianchi Region, Yunnan. Agric. Hist. China 40 (2), 36–47. (in Chinese).
Yang, X., Wan, Z., Perry, L., Lu, H., Wang, Q., Zhao, C., et al. (2012). Early Millet Use in Northern China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 (10), 3726–3730. doi:10.1073/pnas.1115430109
Zhang, J., Lu, H., Gu, W., Wu, N., Zhou, K., Hu, Y., et al. (2012). Early Mixed Farming of Millet and Rice 7800 Years Ago in the Middle Yellow River Region, China. Plos One 7 (12), e52146. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052146
Zhang, Y. (1989). Climatic Division of the Hengduan Mountains Region. Mountain Res. 7 (1), 13–20. (in Chinese).
Zhao, Z., and Chen, J. (2011). Flotation Results and Analysis on Yingpanshan Site in Mao County. Sichuan Cult. Relics South. China 3, 60–67. (in Chinese).
Zhao, Z. (2010). Report of Plant Remains at the Shifodong Site, Shifodong in Gengma County. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press, 368–373. (in Chinese).
Zhong, Y., Lu, D., Yan, B., Zuo, Z., Sun, C., Liu, X., et al. (2016). The Report of Investigation and Excavation of Guijiabao Site in Yanyuan County in 2015. Archaeological Discoveries in Chengdu, 18–52. (in Chinese).
Zhou, X., Yu, J., Spengler, R. N., Shen, H., Zhao, K., Ge, J., et al. (2020). 5,200-year-old Cereal Grains from the Eastern Altai Mountains Redate the Trans-eurasian Crop Exchange. Nat. Plants 6, 78–87. doi:10.1038/s41477-019-0581-y
Keywords: rice, millet, phytolith, mixed farming, crop dispersal, southwest China, mainland Southeast Asia
Citation: Huan X, Deng Z, Zhou Z, Yan X, Hao X, Bu Q and Lu H (2022) The Emergence of Rice and Millet Farming in the Zang-Yi Corridor of Southwest China Dates Back to 5000 Years Ago. Front. Earth Sci. 10:874649. doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.874649
Received: 12 February 2022; Accepted: 13 April 2022;
Published: 28 April 2022.
Edited by:
Ying Guan, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology (CAS), ChinaReviewed by:
Chuan-Chao Wang, Xiamen University, ChinaKeliang Zhao, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology (CAS), China
Copyright © 2022 Huan, Deng, Zhou, Yan, Hao, Bu and Lu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhenhua Deng, emhlbmh1YWRlbmdAcGt1LmVkdS5jbg==