Maria L. Geisinger- Department of Periodontology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
Regeneration of periodontal tissues that have been destroyed by inflammatory periodontitis involves the initiation of tissue engineering and wound healing of multiple tissues involved in the function of the teeth, including the periodontal ligament, cementum, and alveolar bone. Such regeneration is termed guided tissue regeneration and the unique challenges to reconstruct these tissues involve a complex interplay of cells, signaling molecules, and scaffolds. While traditional guided tissue regeneration treatments have involved cell occlusive membranes, bone replacement graft scaffolds, and endogenous multipotent mesenchymal stem cells, the use of adjunctive materials to enhance healing outcomes has been studied and many such adjunctive factors are in common current clinical use. This report will focus on the current and emerging adjunctive growth factors and signaling molecules that can be used to optimize periodontal regeneration in periodontal intrabony defects, their mechanisms of action, the challenges associated with periodontal regeneration, and future avenues for research.
Background
Periodontitis is an initiated by dysbiotic biofilm and is an immune-inflammatory disease that results in the destruction of the supporting tissues around the teeth (1). Periodontitis is widely prevalent, affecting an estimated 42% of adults in the United States over the age of 30 (2) with an estimated 1 billion individuals suffering from severe periodontitis globally (3). If untreated, periodontitis can result in tooth mobility, tooth loss, and masticatory dysfunction (1, 4). Elimination of etiologic factors and inflammation is critical to arresting and controlling disease progression, but such traditional approaches often result in repair and a compromised periodontium, rather than restoration of periodontal tissues to augment function and reduce disease recurrence (5). True periodontal regeneration is defined as the reconstitution of alveolar bone, cementum, and a functionally-oriented periodontal ligament (PDL) on a previously diseased root surface (6). Due to the diversity of the tissues required for complete restoration of the periodontium as well as the challenges of the periodontal defect morphology, achieving optimal periodontal regeneration is often challenging. To augment outcomes, particularly in challenging clinical scenarios, the use of adjunctive growth factors and signaling molecules has been employed, but challenges remain (7, 8). Recruitment and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells is often dependent upon growth factors and signaling molecules and a challenge in the utilization of adjunctive mediators in periodontal regeneration is the multiple tissues that are required for true periodontal regeneration and their variable embryonic development that must be, in part, recreated during their reconstruction (5, 9). To recreate these diverse tissues, cell-type specific biologic cues would be ideal to best create neogenesis of the functional unit of the periodontium (10, 11) and, while current technologies do not allow for this type of segregation, emerging research suggests that advanced biologic mediators may allow better recreation of periodontal tissues.
Currently available growth factors and signaling molecules
Growth factors are proteins with the capacity to promote chemotaxis, proliferation, differentiation, neovascularization, and protein and extracellular matrix synthesis (12). Biologic functions associated with such mediators vary, but those identified as adjunctive materials for use in periodontal regeneration are based upon their roles in periodontal wound healing and/or embryonic development of the periodontium with current materials used for reconstruction of periodontal and peri-implant hard and soft tissues (13, 14). The mechanisms of action of various adjunctive factors vary and the efficacy of different factors may be more or less appropriate in individual clinical scenarios.
Enamel matrix derivative
Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) is a mixture of embryonic proteins derived from porcine tooth buds. The preponderance of the protein is amelogenin (>90%) with other proteins present to include ameloblastin, fetuin A, and α-1-antichymotrypsin. These proteins are in an aqueous solution of propylene glycol alginate and are applied as a gel using a syringe into periodontal intrabony defects (12, 15). These proteins, derived from the tooth buds and found in adults in Hertwig's epithelial root sheath (HERS) are critical for odontogenesis, including the formation of the periodontal tissues. In vitro effects of EMD on osteoblasts demonstrate enhanced expression of collagen type I, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and prostaglandin G/H synthase-2 (PGHS-2) and has shown increased transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β) in PDL cells (16–18). Further, EMD has been shown to enhance osteoblastic differentiation of oral stem cells via osteogenic pathways including, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and bone morphogenic protein (BMP) (19, 20). In vivo, EMD has demonstrated enhanced gene expression, protein synthesis, mitogenesis, angiogenesis/neovasculogenesis, and differentiation of PDL and osteoblast cells (21). This high level of enhanced cellular activity was not seen if amelogenin or ameloblastin alone were used, suggesting that the interplay between the proteins within EMD may give rise to a synergistic regenerative effect (21).
Enamel matrix derivatives have been proposed for use in intrabony defects as an individual treatment modality and/or to augment the use of bone replacement grafts as well as for improvement of outcomes of periodontal soft tissue grafting (7, 8, 22). The use of EMD at intrabony defects has been shown to produce enhanced radiographic bone fill and improved clinical parameters compared to open flap debridement (OFD) alone (23, 24). The additional clinical benefits demonstrated at sites treated with EMD vs. debridement after 1 year, included significant improvements in probing attachment levels (1.1 mm) and probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction (0.9 mm) (24). However, studies have not shown significant benefit related to enhanced clinical and radiographic outcomes with the adjunctive use of EMD with GTR compared to GTR alone (14, 23). Overall the use of EMD for periodontal regeneration has shown results that are similar to outcomes seen with GTR techniques and/or bone replacement grafting and it has been reported to have increased ease of use (24). Additionally, animal and human studies have demonstrated histologic regeneration of cementum, PDL, and—to a lesser extent—alveolar bone on previously diseased root surfaces (25–27). While the safety and efficacy of EMD for periodontal regenerative procedures have been well-documented over the more than 20 years of its use, future indications may include the use of EMD to aid in minimally invasive and microsurgical procedures and at supraalveolar defects (0-walled periodontal defects) (28–32).Given these findings, clinical use of EMD for periodontal regeneration may be recommended, particularly as an adjunct to OFD or at intrabony defects in combination with bone replacement grafts, to augment treatment outcomes and reduce post-operative patient complications (14).
Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB
Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB) is commercially available in combination with beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and has been studied in many aspects of periodontal regeneration (33). Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) originates primarily from the degranulation of platelets and is also secreted by activated fibroblasts and macrophages (34). In addition to rhPDGF, this growth factor is also found in supraphysiologic concentrations in autologous blood products (ABPs), including platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) (35). PDGF is a potent activator for cells of mesenchymal origin and comes in five different dimeric isoforms including PDGF-AA, PDGF-BB, PDGF-CC, and PDGF-DD homodimers and a PDGF-AB heterodimer (36). Each of these isoforms has variable affinity for their respective receptors, PDGF-ζ and PDGF-β tyrosine kinase receptors (37). PDGF-BB is able to bind all receptor isotypes and in vitro studies demonstrate that this form elicits more mitogenic and chemotactic effects when compared to other isoforms (38). The utility of PDGF for periodontal regeneration in intrabony defects is related to its powerful ability to stimulate mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and expression of stem cell markers, particularly related to mesenchymal stem cells found within the PDL (39) and can increase osteogenic potential by enhancing osteoprogenitor cell mitosis and the receptiveness of such cells towards osteogenic growth factors like bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs) (40). In vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated enhanced collagen synthesis, PDL cell proliferation, and enhanced osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) (41, 42).
A 36-month multicenter randomized controlled trial demonstrated significant clinical benefits of the use of rhPDGF-BB and β-TCP compared to β-TCP alone with 87% of the group receiving 0.3 mg/ml rhPDGF-BB achieving ≥2.7 mm clinical attachment level gain and ≥1.1 mm linear bone growth (LBG) compared to 53.8% of sites with β-TCP bone replacement graft alone (43, 44). Further, the use of rhPDGF-BB in intrabony defects resulted in enhanced bone fill and reduced probing depths when compared to other bone replacement grafting techniques (45) and its adjunctive use in combination with GTR may also provide an additive benefit (8). Histologic evaluations have demonstrated proof-in-principle of true periodontal regeneration above a reference notch in calculus at teeth treated with rhPDF-BB and β-TCP (46). Further, in surgically created recession defects, the use of rhPDGF-BB and β-TCP demonstrated evidence of regeneration of cementum, functionally oriented PDL, and alveolar bone via histology and micro-computerized tomography (micro-CT), which was not seen when connective tissue grafts (CTG) were used to treat such defects (47). Investigations have also suggested that the adjunctive use of rhPDGF-BB in combination with bone replacement graft materials can result in accelerated healing and new bone formation as well as enhanced clinical bone density when compared with bone replacement graft materials alone (48, 49). Such evidence may suggest that the use of rhPDGF-BB alone or as an adjunct to other regenerative techniques may enhance outcomes, particularly in challenging clinical scenarios (7).
Fibroblast growth factor-2
Fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) has been proposed for use in periodontal regeneration as it has been shown to play a role in wound healing, granulation tissue formation, angiogenesis, and enhanced hard and soft tissue turnover (50). Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-2 induces strong angiogenic and proliferative activities in undifferentiated mesenchymal cells within the periodontal ligament (51, 52). Histologic evidence of true periodontal regeneration has been seen in non-human primates (53).
Due to the role of FGF-2 in tissue repair and its mitogenic properties, the potential for enhancement of regenerative outcomes has been proposed, including evidence of true periodontal regeneration with new cementum, PDL, and alveolar bone formation seen in translational models (53, 54). Human clinical studies with FGF-2 have also shown the advantage of adjunctive use of FGF-2 at intrabony periodontal defects with a good safety profile (45, 55, 56). Optimized dosages of 0.3% and 0.4% rhFGF-2 demonstrated CAL gain of ≥1.5 mm and linear bone growth of ≥2.5 mm at 71% of sites compared to 45% of sites treated with control or 0.1% rhFGF-2 (55). Further, at 6 months post-operatively percentage of bone fill for the 0.3% and 0.4% rhFGF-2 was 75% and 71%, respectively compared with 63% and 61% for the 0.1% rhFGF-2 and control groups (55). These findings highlight a dose-dependent pattern of outcomes with a plateau in the 0.3% and 0.4% concentrations of rhFGF-2 (55). This dose-dependent relationship was confirmed in additional studies with a 0.3% rhFGF-2 concentration demonstrating higher levels of bone fill compared to 0.1% and 0.4% (57). A phase III trial compared FGF-2 to enamel matrix derivative (EMD), with greater bone formation at sites treated with rhFGF-2 (58).While FGF-2 is not approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in dentistry, it has been used elsewhere in the world in the treatment of periodontal defects.
Parathyroid hormone derivatives
Endogenous parathyroid hormone has a potent impact on bone formation and maturation. It has been well-established that pulsed administration of low-dose teriparatide, the first 34 amino acids of parathyroid hormone, has anabolic effects on bone formation and remodeling and is widely used as a therapy for osteoporosis and osteopenia (59). This medication is self-administered via subcutaneous daily injections. Teriparatide acts on preosteoblasts to increase proliferation and also acts indirectly on osteoblasts to decrease osteoblast apoptosis (59–61). It also upregulates bFGF-2 (62) and transcriptionally suppresses the osteocytic Sclerostin (SOST) gene, an inhibitor of bone formation (63). Both of these functions may contribute to its anabolic properties. Teriparatide has demonstrated efficacy in reducing alveolar bone loss in experimental periodontitis models (64) and has also shown that adjunctive daily injection of teriparatide in conjunction with calcium and vitamin D supplementation in patients with severe periodontitis during a 6-week post-surgical phase demonstrated superior linear radiographic alveolar defect resolution compared to placebo (60).
More recently, abaloparatide has been approved by the FDA as a second-generation osteoanabolic drug for treating osteoporosis (65). Abaloparatide is a synthetic analog of parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) (66), which shares the same receptor PTH1R and plays similar biological activities with teriparatide (67). Emerging animal model investigations indicate that the effects of abaloparatide may be more potent than those of teriparatide when used as an adjunct during the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects (68). While these osteoanabolic drugs have not yet been adopted for widespread treatment of periodontal defects, their utility appears promising and the ideal mode and timing of administration should be investigated.
Emerging growth factors and signaling molecules
While currently available growth factors have demonstrated utility as adjuncts in enhancing outcomes with periodontal treatments, limitations of their use continue to exist. In seeking enhanced efficacy and potency for treatment of intrabony periodontal defects, researchers have proposed several emerging adjunctive therapeutic targets.
Pro-resolving mediators
While inflammation is required for the initiation of wound healing and regeneration uncontrolled or unresolving inflammatory response can impair an organized healing response (69). Destruction of periodontal and other tissues is generally characterized by a dysregulation or dysfunction of the inflammatory process and both the inflammatory and resolution phases are critical in the ability to regenerate lost periodontal tissues (7). Pro-resolving lipid mediators, such as resolvins and lipoxins, are promising candidates to aid in the arrest of periodontal diseases and the regeneration of lost periodontal tissues (70–72). Resolvins, including resolving D1 and resolving E1, have been shown in preclinical and animal models to demonstrated to inhibit the destructive inflammatory process and alveolar bone loss in laboratory-induced periodontitis under controlled experimental conditions (73) and have been shown to reduce systemic pro-inflammatory mediators, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-1β after periodontal treatment and adjunctive resolving use (74). Further, lipoxins, which are lipid mediators produced in vivo by lipoxygenase enzymes from epithelial cells, monocytes, and neutrophils, in response to stimulation with pro-inflammatory prostaglandins have been shown to induce bone formation in animal models when delivered via nano-vessicles (75). These findings are promising and may indicate a role for the use of pro-resolving mediators in the treatment of periodontal disease and to improve periodontal regeneration outcomes.
Hyaluronic acid
Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a major endogenous component of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in almost all tissues. HA is a hygroscopic and viscoelastic biomolecule with an essential role in maintaining and healing the extracellular matrix of tissues throughout the body (76). HA aids in the functions of healing that require new collagen matrix deposition and efficient vascularization (77, 78). In vivo, HA has been associated with enhanced soft tissue wound healing through mechanisms of cellular signaling, regulation of cell adhesion and proliferation, and cell differentiation (79, 80). In current common medical usage, HA is used for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases, including osteoarthritis and degenerative joint disorders. Given the infectious and inflammatory nature of periodontitis and the presence of HA within the extracellular matrix of the gingiva and the periodontal ligament (81), it is feasible that the application of HA could result in positive clinical outcomes for disease resolution within the periodontium. Histologic evidence has demonstrated increased gingival microvascular density at early healing time points after HA (82). And a recent clinical investigation has demonstrated enhanced matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1) protein levels, lysyl oxidase (LOX) mRNA expression and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP1) gene expression associated with HA use within the initial 24 h after surgery (83).
Initial clinical studies have shown the use of HA in combination with bone replacement graft materials demonstrates significant clinical improvements at deep intrabony defects (84). In this investigation, CAL gain at 6 months was 3.65 ± 1.67 mm and PPD reduction of 4.54 ± 1.65 mm (84). Additionally, the adjunctive use of HA in combination with OFD demonstrated enhanced clinical outcomes and radiographic defect fill (85). A recent systematic review of studies of at least 6 months demonstrated significant clinical benefits in terms of PPD reduction and CAL gain (86). These findings highlight the potential for the use of HA in periodontal regenerative protocols to enhance clinical outcomes.
Regenerative challenges and potential role of growth factors and signaling molecules
True periodontal regeneration in intrabony defects is challenging as it requires the simultaneous regeneration of multiple tissues in a functional manner. Further, the destruction of such periodontal tissues and the formation of periodontal intrabony defects is almost always due to inflammatory periodontal disease and the primary etiology of dysbiotic bacterial biofilm; thus, the treatment of these defects requires not only regenerative techniques but also disease control and meticulous daily biofilm removal (87). Due to these factors, periodontal tissue regeneration is a complex process that necessitates control of local infectious and inflammatory processes to allow for appropriate regeneration and wound healing as well as space maintenance, recruitment and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells, retardation or occlusion of epithelial downgrowth into the periodontal defect, and optimal scaffolds within the defect to guide tissue formation. Given the complexities of this healing, the use of adjunctive factors to enhance the function of traditional materials could result in more optimal tissue formation at such defects (10, 11, 88). The use of adjunctive growth factors in periodontal regeneration is dependent upon a delicate balance of concentration, timing within the wound healing process, and focused application to produce diverse cell and tissue types. As technologies advance to better direct regenerative outcomes, we will continue to assess the role of delivery and combinations of biomimetic adjunctive products for the enhancement of periodontal regeneration.
Conclusions
Regenerative medicine for treatment of periodontal defects continues to evolve and scientific discovery is allowing clinicians to better mimic natural tissue development and healing at sites that have been destroyed by periodontal disease. Despite the current state of the science, much work to allow for the clinical implementation of such techniques is left to be done. The use of adjunctive growth factors and/or signaling molecules may allow for a more biomimetic environment that can enhance regenerative outcomes. Future investigations focused on ideal concentration, time of delivery, and anchoring of growth factors within periodontal defects to allow for more targeted regeneration of the hard and soft tissue components of the periodontium.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor to this work and approves of its publication.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Abbreviations
ABP, autologous blood products; BMP, bone morphogenic protein; β-TCP, beta-tricalcium phosphate; CAL, clinical attachment level; CRP, c-reactive protein; CTG, connective tissue graft; EMD, enamel matrix derivative; FDA, food and drug administration; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; HA, hyaluronic acid; HERS, Hertwig's epithelial root sheath; GDF, growth and differentiation factor; GTR, guided tissue regeneration; LOX, lysyl oxidase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; Micro-CT, micro computerized tomography; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; OFD, open flap debridement; PDL, periodontal ligament; PGHS-2, prostaglandin G/H synthase-2; PPD, probing pocket depth; PTHrP, parathyroid hormone-related protein; rhPDF, recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor; SOST, osteocytic sclerosin gene; TGF, transforming growth factor; TIMP, tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase.
References
1. Kinane D, Stathopoulou P, Papapanou P. Periodontal diseases. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2017) 3:17038. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.38
2. Eke PI, Thorton-Evans GO, Wei L, Borgnakke WS, Dye BA, Genco RJ. Periodontitis in US adults: national health and nutrition examination survey 2009–2014. J Am Dent Assoc. (2018) 149(7):576–88. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.04.023
3. Chen MX, Zhong YJ, Dong QQ, Wong HM, Wen YF. Global, regional, and national burden of severe periodontitis, 1990–2019: an analysis of the global burden of disease study 2019. J Clin Periodontol. (2021) 48(9):1165–88. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13506
4. Könönen E, Gursoy M, Gursoy UK. Periodontitis: a multifacted disease of tooth supporting tissues. J Clin Med. (2019) 8(8):1135. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081135
5. Liang Y, Luan X, Liu X. Recent advances in periodontal regeneration: a biomaterial perspective. Bioact Mater. (2020) 5(2):297–308. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.02.012
6. American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms. Periodontal regeneration. Available at: https://members.perio.org/libraries/glossary/entry?GlossaryKey=b7286723-1906-4a0d-a98f-4250e9ad8a55
7. Avila-Ortiz G, Ambruster J, Barootchi S, Chambrone L, Chen C-Y, Dixon DR, et al. American Academy of periodontology best evidence consensus statement on the use of biologics in clinical practice. J Periodontol. (2022) 93(12):1763–70. doi: 10.1002/JPER.22-0361
8. Tavelli L, Chen CY, Barootchi S, Kim DM. Efficacy of biologics for the treatment of periodontal infrabony defects: an American academy of periodontology best evidence systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Periodontol. (2022) 93(12):1803–26. doi: 10.1002/JPER.22-0120
9. Bottino MC, Thomas V, Schmidt G, Vohra YK, Chu TMG, Kowolik MJ, et al. Recent advanced in the development of GTR/GBR membranes for periodontal regeneration—a materials perspective. Dent Mater. (2012) 28(7):703–21. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.022
10. Daghrery A, Bottino MC. Advanced biomaterials for periodontal tissue regeneration. Genesis. (2022) 60(8-9):e23501. doi: 10.1002/dvg.23501
11. Yu M, Luo D, Qiao J, Guo J, He D, Jin S, et al. A hierarchical bilayer architecture for complex tissue regeneration. Bioact Mater. (2022) 10:93–106. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.08.024
12. Lin Z, Rios HF, Cochran DL. Emerging regenerative approaches for periodontal reconstruction: a systematic review from the AAP regeneration workshop. J Periodontol. (2015) 86:S134–152. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.120689
13. Darby IB, Morris KH. A systematic review of the use of growth factors in human periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol. (2013) 84:465–76. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.120145
14. Galli M, Yao Y, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Current and future trends in periodontal tissue engineering and bone regeneration. Plast Aesthet Res. (2021) 8:3. doi: 10.20517/2347-9264.2020.176
15. Gestrelius S, Lyngstadaas SP, Hammarström L, Gestrelius S, Lyngstadaas SP, Hammarström L. Emdogain—periodontal regeneration based on biomimicry. Clin Oral Invest. (2000) 4:120–5. doi: 10.1007/s007840050127
16. Jiang J, Fouad AF, Safavi KE, Spångberg LSW, Zhu Q. Effects of enamel matrix derivative on gene expression in primary osteoblasts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. (2001) 91:95–100. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.111304
17. VanderPauw MT, VandenBos T, Everts V, Beertsen W. Enamel-matrix derived protein stimulates attachment of periodontal ligament fibroblasts and enhances alkaline phosphatase activity and transforming growth factor 1 release of periodontal and gingival fibroblasts. J Periodontol. (2000) 71:31–4. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.1.31
18. Lyngstadaas SP, Ekdahl J, Lundberg E, Andersson C, Gestrelius S. Increased TGF-1 production in PDL cells grown on emdogain matrix. J Dent Res. (1999) 78(Spec Iss):189.
19. Zhang B, Xiao M, Cheng X, Bai Y, Chen H, Yu Q, Qiu L. Enamel matrix derivative enhances the odontoblastic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells via activating MAPK signaling pathways. Stem Cells Int. (2022):2236250. doi: 10.1155/2022/2236250
20. Suzuki S, Nagano T, Yamakoshi Y, Gomi K, Arai T, Fukae M, et al. Enamel matrix derivative gel stimulates signal transduction of BMP and TGF-β. J Dent Res. (2005) 84(6):510–4. doi: 10.1177/154405910508400605
21. Grandin HM, Gemperli AC, Dard M. Enamel matrix derivative: a review of cellular effects in vitro and a model of molecular arrangement and functioning. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. (2012) 18:181–202. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0365
22. Tavelli L, McGuire MK, Zucchelli G, Raspirini G, Feinberg SF, Wang HL, et al. Biologics-based regenerative technologies for periodontal soft tissue engineering. J Periodontol. (2020) 91:147–54. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0352
23. Nibali L, Koidou VP, Nieri M, Barbato L, Pagliaro U, Cairo F. Regenerative surgery versus access flap for the treatment of intra-bony periodontal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. (2020) 27(Suppl 22):320–51. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13237
24. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Papanikolaou N, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. Enamel matrix derivative (emdogain®) for periodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2009) 2009:CD003875. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003875.pub3
25. Hammarström L, Heijl L, Gestrelius S. Periodontal regeneration in a buccal dehiscence model in monkeys after application of enamel matrix proteins. J Clin Periodontol. (1997) 24:669–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb00248.x
26. Sculean A, Donos N, Windisch P, Brecx M, Gera I, Reich E, et al. Healing of human intrabony defects following treatment with enamel matrix proteins or guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontal Res. (1999) 34:310–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1999.tb02259.x
27. Yukna RA, Mellonig JT. Histologic evaluation of periodontal healing in humans following regenerative therapy with enamel matrix derivative. A 10-case series. J Periodontol. (2000) 71:752–9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.5.752
28. Miron RJ, Sculean A, Cochran DL, Froum S, Zucchelli G, Nemcovsky C, et al. Twenty years of enamel matrix derivative: the past, the present and the future. J Clin Periodontol. (2016) 43:668–83. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12546
29. Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Clinical concepts for regenerative therapy in intrabony defects. Periodontol 2000. (2015) 68:282–307. doi: 10.1111/prd.12048
30. Cortellini P. Minimally invasive surgical techniques in periodontal regeneration. Journal of Evid Bas Dent Pract. (2012) 12:89–100. doi: 10.1016/S1532-3382(12)70021-0
31. Di Tullio M, Femminella B, Pilloni A, Romano L, D'Arcangelo C, De Ninis P, et al. Treatment of supraalveolar-type defects by a simplified papilla preservation technique for access flap surgery with or without enamel matrix proteins. J Periodontol. (2013) 84:1100–10. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.120075
32. Graziani F, Gennai S, Cei S, Ducci F, Discepoli N, Carmignani A, et al. Does enamel matrix derivative application provide additional clinical benefits in residual periodontal pockets associated with suprabony defects? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Clin Periodontol. (2014) 41:377–86. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12218
33. Suárez-López Del Amo F, Monje A, Padial-Molina M, Tang Z, Wang HL. Biologic agents for periodontal regeneration and implat site development. Biomed Res Int. (2015) 2015:957518. doi: 10.1155/2015/957518
34. Dereka XE, Markopoulou CE, Vrotsos IA. Role of growth factors on periodontal repair. Growth Factors. (2006) 24:260–7. doi: 10.1080/08977190601060990
35. Civinini R, Macera A, Nistri L, Redl B, Innocenti M. The use of autologous blood-derived growth factors in bone regeneration. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. (2011) 8(1):25–31.22461800
36. Fredriksson L, Li H, Eriksson U. The PDGF family: four gene products form five dimeric isoforms. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. (2004) 15:197–204. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2004.03.007
37. Andrae J, Gallini R, Betsholtz C. Role of platelet-derived growth factors in physiology and medicine. Genes Dev. (2008) 22:1276–312. doi: 10.1101/gad.1653708
38. Boyan A, Bhargava G, Nishimura F, Orman R, Price R, Terranova VP. Mitogenic and chemotactic responses of human periodontal ligament cells to the different isoforms of platelet-derived growth factor. J Dent Res. (1994) 73:1593–600. doi: 10.1177/00220345940730100301
39. Mihaylova Z, Tsikandelova R, Sanimirov P, Gateva N, Mitev V, Ishkitiev N. Role of PDGF-BB in proliferation, differentiation, and maintaining stem cell properties of PDL cells in vitro. Arch Oral Biol. (2018) 85:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.09.019
40. Caplan AI, Correa D. PDGF In bone formation and regeneration: new insights into a novel mechanism involving MSCs. J Orthop Res. (2011) 29:1795–803. doi: 10.1002/jor.21462
41. Zhang N, Lo CW, Utsunomiya T, Maruyama M, Huang E, Rhee C, et al. PDGF-BB and IL-4 co-overexpression is a potential strategy to enhance mesenchymal stem cell-based bone regeneration. Stem Cell Res Ther. (2021) 12:40. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-02086-8
42. Komatsu K, Ideno H, Shibata T, Nakashima K, Nifuji A. Platelet-derived growth factor-BB regenerates functional periodontal ligament in the tooth replantation. Sci Rep. (2022) 12(1):3223. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06865-6
43. Nevins M, Kao RT, McGuire MK, McClain PK, Hinrichs JE, McAllister BS, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor promotes periodontal regeneration in localized osseous defects: 36-month extension results from a randomized, controlled, double-masked clinical trial. J Periodontol. (2013) 84(4):456–64. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.120141
44. Nevins M, Giannobile WV, McGuire MK, Kao RT, Mellonig JT, Hinrichs JE, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor stimulates bone fill and rate of attachment level gain: results of a large multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol. (2005) 76(12):2205–15. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.12.2205
45. Li F, Yu F, Xu X, Li C, Huang D, Zhou Z, et al. Evaluation of recombinant human FGF-2 and PDGF-BB in periodontal regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:65. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00113-y
46. Ridgway HK, Mellonig JT, Cochran DL. Human histologic and clinical evaluation of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor and beta-tricalcium phosphate for the treatment of periodontal intraosseous defects. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. (2008) 28(2):171–9.
47. McGuire MK, Scheyer ET, Schupach P. Growth factor–mediated treatment of recession defects: a randomized controlled trial and histologic and microcomputed tomography examination. J Periodontol. (2009) 80(4):500–64. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080502
48. Geurs N, Ntounis A, Vassilopoulos P, Van der Velden U, Loos BG, Reddy M. Using growth factors in human extraction sockets: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of short-term healing. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. (2014) 29(2):485–96. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3408
49. Ntounis A, Geurs N, Vassilopoulos P, Reddy M. Clinical assessment of bone quality of human extraction sockets after conversion with growth factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. (2015) 30(1):196–201. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3518
50. Murakami M, Simons M. Fibroblast growth factor regulation of neovascularization. Curr Opin Hematol. (2008) 15:215–20. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e3282f97d98
51. Murakami S, Takayama S, Ikezawa K, Shimabukuro Y, Kitamura M, Nozaki T, et al. Regeneration of periodontal tissues by basic fibroblast growth factor. J. Periodontal Res. (1999) 34:425–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1999.tb02277.x
52. Murakami S. Periodontal tissue regeneration by signaling molecule(s): what role does basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) have in periodontal therapy? Periodontol 2000. (2011) 56:188–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00365.x
53. Takayama S, Murakami S, Shimabukuro Y, Kitamura M, Okada H. Periodontal regeneration by FGF-2 (bFGF) in primate models. J Dent Res. (2001) 80:2075–9. doi: 10.1177/00220345010800121001
54. Murakami M, Takayama S, Kitamura M, Shimabukuro Y, Yanagi K, Ikezawa K, et al. Recombinant human basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) stimulates periodontal regeneration in class II furcation defects created in beagle dogs. J Periodontal Res. (2003) 38:97–103. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0765.2003.00640.x
55. Cochran DL, Oh TJ, Mills MP, Clem DS, McClain PK, Schallhorn RA, et al. A randomized clinical trial evaluating rhFGF-2/(-TCP in periodontal defects. J Dent Res. (2016) 95:523–30. doi: 10.1177/0022034516632497
56. Khoshkam V, Chan HL, Lin GH, Mailoa J, Giannobile WV, Wang HL, et al. Outcomes of regenerative treatment with rhPDGF-BB and rhFGF-2 for periodontal intra-bony defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. (2015) 42:272–80. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12354
57. Nagayasu-Tanaka T, Nozaki T, Miki K, Sawada K, Kitamura M, Murakami S. FGF-2 promotes initial osseointegration and enhances stability of implants with low primary stability. Clin Oral Implants Res. (2017) 28:291–7. doi: 10.1111/clr.12797
58. Kitamura M, Akamatsu M, Kawanami M, Furuichi Y, Fujii T, Mori M, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled and controlled non-inferiority phase III trials comparing trafermin, a recombinant human fibroblast growth factor 2, and enamel matrix derivative in periodontal regeneration in intrabony defects. J Bone Miner Res. (2016) 31:806–14. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2738
59. Silva BC, Bilezikian JP. Parathyroid hormone: anabolic and catabolic actions on the skeleton. Curr Opin Pharmacol. (2015) 22:41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2015.03.005
60. Bashutski JD, Eber RM, Kinney JS, Benavides E, Maitra S, Braun TM, et al. Teriparatide and osseous regeneration in the oral cavity. N Engl J Med. (2010) 363:2396–405. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005361
61. Rios HF, Bashutski JD, McAllister BS, Murakami S, Cobb CM, Patricia Chun YH, et al. Emerging regenerative approaches for periodontal reconstruction: practical applications from the AAP regeneration workshop. Clin Adv Periodontics. (2015) 5(1):40–6. doi: 10.1902/cap.2015.140052
62. Mayahara H, Ito T, Nagai H, Miyajima H, Tsukuda R, Taketomi S, et al. In vivo stimulation of endosteal bone formation by basic fibroblast growth factor in rats. Growth Factors. (1993) 9:73–80. doi: 10.3109/08977199308991583
63. Kramer I, Keller H, Leupin O, Kneissel M. Does osteocytic SOST suppression mediate PTH bone anabolism? Trends Endocrinol Metab. (2010) 21:237–44. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2009.12.002
64. Barros SP, Silva MA, Somerman MJ. Parathyroid hormone protects against periodontitis-associated bone loss. J Dent Res. (2003) 82:791–5. doi: 10.1177/154405910308201006
65. Bhattacharyya S, Pal S, Chattopadhyay N. Abaloparatide, the second generation osteoanabolic drug: molecular mechanisms underlying its advantages over the first-in-class teriparatide. Biochem Pharmacol. (2019) 166:185–91. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2019.05.024
66. Shirley M. Abaloparatide: first global approval. Drugs. (2017) 77:1363–8. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0780-7
67. Martin TJ. Parathyroid hormone-related protein, its regulation of cartilage and bone development, and role in treating bone diseases. Physiol Rev. (2016) 96:831–71. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00031.2015
68. Li Y, Qian Y, Qiao H, Pan W, Xie L, Li Y. Abaloparatide outperforms teriparatide in protecting against alveolar bone loss in experimental periodontitis. J Periodontol. (2023) 94(2):244–55. doi: 10.1002/JPER.22-0211
69. Hasturk H, Kantarci A. Activation and resolution of periodontal inflammation and its systemic impact. Periodontol 2000. (2015) 69(1):255–73. doi: 10.1111/prd.12105
70. Serhan CN, Chiang N, Dalli J. New pro-resolving n-3 mediators bridge resolution of infectious inflammation to tissue regeneration. Mol Aspects Med. (2018) 64:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2017.08.002
71. Van Dyke TE. Pro-resolving mediators in the regulation of periodontal disease. Mol Aspects Med. (2017) 58:21–36. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2017.04.006
72. Ali M, Yang F, Plachokova AS, Jansen JA, Walboomers XF. Application of specialized pro-resolving mediators in periodontitis and peri-implantitis: a review. Eur J Oral Sci. (2021) 129(1):e12759. doi: 10.1111/eos.12759
73. Alshibani N. Resolvins as a treatment modality in experimental periodontitis: a systematic review of preclinical studies. Cureus. (2022) 14(1):e21095. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21095
74. Hasturk H, Kantarci A, Goguet-Surmenian E, Blackwood A, Andry C, Serhan CN, et al. Resolvin E1 regulates inflammation at the cellular and tissue level and restores tissue homeostasis in vivo. J Immunol. (2007) 179:7021–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.10.7021
75. Van Dyke TE, Hasturk H, Kantarci A, Freire MO, Nguyen D, Dalli J, Serhan CN, et al. Proresolving nanomedicines activate bone regeneration in periodontitis. J Dent Res. (2015) 94(1):148–56. doi: 10.1177/0022034514557331
76. Dahiya P, Kamal R. Hyaluronic acid: a boon in periodontal therapy. N Am J Med Sci. (2013) 5(5):309–15. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.112473
77. Aya KL, Stern R. Hyaluronan in wound healing: rediscovering a major player. Wound Repair Regen. (2014) 22(5):579–93. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12214
78. Hämmerle CH, Giannobile WV. Working group 1 of the European workshop on periodontology. Biology of soft tissue wound healing and regeneration—consensus report of group 1 of the 10th European workshop on periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. (2014) 41(Suppl 15):S1–5. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12221
79. Bansal J, Kedige SD, Anand S. Hyaluronic acid: a promising mediator for periodontal regeneration. Ind J Dent Res. (2010) 21(4):575–8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.74232
80. Burd AR, Ritz M, Regauer S, Longaker MT, Siebert JW, Garg H. Hyaluronan and wound healing: a new perspective. Br J Plast Surg. (1991) 44(8):579–84. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(91)90093-Y
81. Aydinyurt HS, Akbal D, Altindal D, Bozoglan A, Ertugrul AS, Demir H. Evaluation of biochemical and clinical effects of hyaluronic acid on non-surgical periodontal treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Ir J Med Sci. (2020) 189:1485–94. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02230-6
82. Canciani E, Sirello R, Pellegrini G, Henin D, Perrotta M, Toma M, et al. Effects of vitamin and amino acid-enriched hyaluronic acid gel on the healing of oral mucosa: in vivo and in vitro study. Medicina (Kaunas). (2021) 57(3):285. doi: 10.3390/medicina57030285
83. Pilloni A, Marini L, Gagliano N, Canciani E, Dellavia C, Cornaghi LB, et al. Clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and biomolecular analysis of hyaluronic acid in early wound healing of human gingival tissues: a randomized, split-mouth trial. J Periodontol. (2023) 94(7):868–81. doi: 10.1002/JPER.22-0338
84. Božić D, Ćatović I, Badovinac A, Musić L, Par M, Sculean A. Treatment of intrabony defects with a combination of hyaluronic acid and deproteinized porcine bone mineral. Materials (Basel). (2021) 14(22):6795. doi: 10.3390/ma14226795
85. Mamajiwala AS, Sethi KS, Raut CP, Karde PA, Mamajiwala BS. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of 0.8% hyaluronic acid as an adjunct to open flap debridement in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest. (2021) 25(9):5257–71. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03834-7
86. Aldahlawi SA. Clinical and radiological benefits of hyaluronic acid in periodontal infrabony defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Dent J. (2023) 17:E187421062304120. doi: 10.2174/18742106-v17-230619-2022-115
87. Polimeni G, Xiropaidis AV, Wikesjö UME. Biology and principles of periodontal wound healing/regeneration. Periodontol 2000. (2006) 41(1):30–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00157.x
Keywords: periodontal regeneration, periodontitis, wound healing, regenerative medicine, growth factors, signaling molecules
Citation: Geisinger ML (2023) NexGen regen? Challenges and opportunities for growth factors and signaling agents in periodontal regeneration at intrabony defects. Front. Dent. Med 4:1239149. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2023.1239149
Received: 12 June 2023; Accepted: 18 September 2023;
Published: 9 October 2023.
Edited by:
Sema S. Hakki, Selçuk University, TürkiyeReviewed by:
Oleh Andrukhov, Medical University of Vienna, AustriaDarko Bozic, University of Zagreb, Croatia
© 2023 Geisinger. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Maria L. Geisinger, bWlhZ2Rkc0B1YWIuZWR1