Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Digit. Health, 22 August 2023
Sec. Digital Mental Health
This article is part of the Research Topic Digital tools for relaxation and stress management: use, effectiveness and implementation View all 6 articles

Case report: Therapeutic potential of Flourishing-Life-Of-Wish Virtual Reality Therapy on Relaxation (FLOW-VRT-Relaxation)—a novel personalized relaxation in palliative care

\r\nOlive K. L. Woo
Olive K. L. Woo*Antoinette M. Lee\r\nAntoinette M. Lee
  • Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

In view of the global aging population and growing need of palliative care, innovative intervention for effective symptom management is of urgent need. Flourishing-Life-Of-Wish Virtual Reality Therapy (FLOW-VRT) is a brief, structured, manualized, and personalized psychological intervention with theoretical foundations based on stress coping theory, self-determination theory, flow theory, and attention restoration theory. With a specific focus on relaxation, FLOW-VRT-Relaxation intends to facilitate adaptive end-of-life coping through delivering personalized relaxation. This paper reports a case study of the application of FLOW-VRT-Relaxation, and discusses its therapeutic potential as a cost-effective method for reducing palliative symptoms by addressing patient's unmet needs. The case study is a 51-year-old Chinese female, diagnosed with advanced cervix cancer, and presented with unmet psychological (i.e., unfulfilled wishes) and physical needs (i.e., pain and fatigue) before FLOW-VRT-Relaxation. To address her unmet needs, FLOW-VRT-Relaxation was delivered by a registered clinical psychologist specialized in palliative care. Need assessment was first conducted, followed by a 10-min VR travel of Japan as her own choice. Relaxation was verbally coached during VR. Right after VR, consolidation with psychological components including psychoeducation, cognitive and emotional processing, and reminiscence intervention were delivered. The patient showed improvement in physical and psychological symptoms, lower sense of loneliness and engulfment, as well as enhanced peace after FLOW-VRT-Relaxation. The current findings provide encouraging initial support for the feasibility, acceptability, and therapeutic potential of using FLOW-VRT-Relaxation as a cost-effective, scalable and personalized VR relaxation for patients under palliative care. It is hoped that with its optimal use, FLOW-VRT-Relaxation can serve as an alternative therapeutic tool that effectively improves the end-on-life care.

1. Introduction

To improve the end-of-life care for patients under palliative care, a range of evidence-based interventions, both pharmacological and psychological, have been adopted (15). Substantial research on psychological interventions with focus on physical, psychological, spiritual, and social aspects has yielded promising results (6). Despite the ongoing practice of psychological interventions, some of the palliative needs of patients remain unmet. For instance, patients' last wishes (e.g., travelling to novel places, hiking) are often unfulfilled in view of their bedbound condition; there is inadequate private or quiet place that allows quality delivery of relaxation in inpatient setting; limited goals or pleasurable activities are available, resulting in their low sense of self-determination or control. According to a recent systematic review (7), the three most reported unmet needs of Chinese patients of advanced cancer were psychological, physical, and healthcare service and information. Another systematic review (8) more specifically identified the unmet care needs of advanced cancer patients, which included physical needs such as pain, and psychological needs such as “not being able to do the things I used to do”, “I can do less than before”, and “experiencing loss of control over one's life”. Greater unmet needs were found to be associated with “worse depression, anxiety, and quality of life, highlighting the need for interventions providing additional information and psychological support” (7).

Thanks to the advanced technology, there has been a revolution in mental health care that addresses the shortcoming and limitations of traditional treatment approach. Immersive virtual reality (VR), which is increasingly adopted in regular clinical practices, has been identified as a potentially revolutionary tool for psychological treatment of various mental disorders (9). Similar to the application of VR among mental disorders, VR shows unlimited potential in making the impossible possible in palliative care setting. Niki et al. (10) used VR technology in their pilot study to fulfil patients' dying wish of traveling, and reported significant reduction in palliative symptoms after virtual travelling, notably pain, tiredness, drowsiness, shortness of breath, depression, and anxiety. In a feasibility study, Johnson et al. (11) advocated the unlimited potential of VR as a novel treatment modality, which did not only offer quality-of-life benefits to palliative care patients, but also reduced their dependency on pharmacological treatment. Similarly, Nwosu et al. (12) echoed that VR therapy in palliative care was feasible to improve end-of-life care.

Underlying explanations for VR's treatment effect among palliative care patients have been preliminarily explored. The first possible reason relates to the concepts of distraction. A pilot study conducted by Lloyd and Haraldsdottir (13) reported on participants' positive experience of VR intervention among palliative care patients, including reports of joy and happiness and “being lifted out of their current situation” (p. 348), and therefore VR sessions “were able to offer people the capacity for respite from emotional suffering as participants found their experiences to be joyful and calming ” (p. 349). Other studies also reported consistent feedback from participants on the sense of being away from their current situation, which may have relieved their physical and psychological symptoms (1315). A sense of escapism during immersive VR is also proposed, which leads to reduced palliative symptoms, including pain, anxiety, and fatigue (10, 11, 1620). In terms of pain distraction, VR has been appraised as an alternative form of analgesia, attributed to the successful management of pain and emotional distress and anxiety symptoms among patients (10, 11, 1619, 2125). As relaxation techniques were reported to be the second most frequently used of all complementary and alternative medicine modalities by cancer patients receiving treatment (26), VR with natural scenes were found to provide relaxation both objectively and subjectively (27).

Despite the preliminary exploration of VR studies among palliative care patients, there remains a significant research and clinical gap. Nwosu et al. (12) reported that no VR resources have been validated for the specific purpose of symptom relief in palliative care, and it is crucial to “consider the purpose of the activity, to identify how content is developed, and to define how (and by whom) it is delivered” (p. 3). Ma et al. (28) emphasized the need of standardization of programs and procedures to facilitate the routine use of VR-based psychotherapies. Regarding relaxation as common practice for symptom control, Pizzoli et al. (29) advocated that personalized approach of VR with focus on personalized needs brings economic advantages and effective interventions for specific patients; however, personalized VR could be difficult to implement within organizational practices, such as hospital. In addition, VR interventions encountered a common problem that compromises its effectiveness and wide adoption- high production cost and time for personalized content. Coelho et al. (30) described the person-centered approach of VR in the context of reminiscence as “more strenuous, as it requires interviewing, traveling, and filming, taking into account the participants’ profile. This may limit the possibility of conducting similar interventions at a larger scale. Nevertheless, a more person-centered approach, which recognizes the individual's biography, is more likely to promote engagement and well-being” (p. 10). Although the clinical benefits of personalized VR have been well acknowledged (31), there is not a single VR study targeting the personalized and scalable use of VR relaxation in palliative care setting.

To address both the research and clinical gap, a novel virtual reality psychological intervention, which is referred as Flourishing-Life-Of-Wish Virtual Reality Therapy (FLOW-VRT®) specially designed for patients under palliative care was developed in the current study. FLOW-VRT is a brief, structured, manualized, and personalized psychological intervention with theoretical foundations based on flow theory (3), stress coping theory (1), self-determination theory (2), and attention restoration theory (4, 5). FLOW-VRT intends to relieve physical and emotional distress, and to promote quality-of-life. It is a standardized and manualized psychological intervention with thorough consideration on the purpose of each VR experience, which VR content to be selected, how VR is to be delivered, and by whom it is delivered. FLOW-VRT with focus on relaxation (FLOW-VRT-Relaxation) allows patients to choose their VR relaxation content, while addressing their unmet physical and psychological needs. A randomized controlled study is currently underway to compare the effectiveness of FLOW-VRT-Relaxation with traditional relaxation practice in palliative symptom control. The current study aims to develop, and test the feasibility and usability of FLOW-VRT-Relaxation as a new protocol, for its potentials to personalized yet be scalable and cost-effective. The current case study documents the treatment response of the first patient under palliative care who receives FLOW-VRT-Relaxation in a hospital setting. The patient is a 51-year-old Chinese female diagnosed with cervix cancer, admitted to hospital due to worsening functional status with unresolved pain and unfulfilled wish.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Participant

Ms. W, 51-year-old Chinese female was diagnosed with cervix cancer and depression in 2012. She was later diagnosed with right sciatic nerve sheath tumor in December 2022. She was admitted to a palliative inpatient ward of a public hospital due to worsening functional status with fungating tumor in September 2022. Please refer to Supplementary Table S1 for the timeline showing episode of care. During admission, she received medication and chemoradiotherapy. Prior to admission, she was unemployed, and mostly homebound relying on rollator for indoor activities and wheelchair for outdoor activities. She was educated to tertiary level.

Upon approach, she was oriented and alert with stable mood, congruent affect, coherent and relevant speech. Despite medical prescriptions (i.e., Etoricoxib, Pregabalin, Morphine and Methadone), she complained about pain and tiredness still. She showed acceptance to current palliative status, aiming for minimal physical and emotional suffering during end-of-life stage. She expressed her long-standing wish of travelling to Japan where she had not visited before, and likely would not be possible to visit in the future. The main objective of the palliative care team was to minimize her suffering looking specifically at her physical, psychological, social and spiritual challenges. She had never used VR technology prior to the study.

2.2. Therapist

The first author of this paper (Woo) delivered FLOW-VRT-Relaxation to Ms. W. Woo is a registered clinical psychologist under Hong Kong Institute of Clinical Psychologist, and certified thanatologist under Association of Death Education and Counselling. She was also a candidate of the Doctor of Psychology (Clinical Psychology) in the University of Hong Kong. She was chiefly responsible for the delivery of psychological services in a palliative care unit of a rehabilitation hospital.

2.3. Design and study procedure

The current case study used a within-subject design. Need assessment was first conducted using a need assessment schedule. The schedule was developed in current study to optimize the use of VR by assessing patient's needs for relaxation. A list of most popular VR relaxation content, which were the results of survey1 conducted among patients under palliative care, was shown to Ms. W who was then asked to choose her preferred relaxation content. She chose Japan Sakura as her virtual relaxation content. A Youtube video on Sakura was retrieved for her virtual travel (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Awz-wNJ_bk0&list=PLztGxkyfoE6_TbFMscEDAbfdDEdV2InD3&index=9&t=13s). Meta Quest 2 as the head-mounted display was used for her virtual exposure.

In order to facilitate the exploration of the virtual environment, a semi-structured protocol consisting of verbal cues and questions was followed during VR experience. This protocol included verbal instructions and questions such as: “Please relax and look around you”; “What are you looking at?”; and “How do you feel now?”. Ms. W was allowed to express freely her thoughts and emotions with reassurance at first, after which she was verbally coached on relaxation exercise. The VR lasted for 10 min.

After VR, consolidation with psychological components was delivered. It aimed to enhance self-esteem, facilitate adaptive coping, and build resilience. It included (1) psychoeducation, i.e., elaborating on the relationship between physiological response and mood; (2) cognitive and emotional processing on the virtual experience; and (3) reminiscence intervention that facilitated sharing on her recollections associated with the VR travel.

The baseline assessment was taken right before the need assessment, while the post-intervention assessment was conducted immediately after the consolidation. The whole session was delivered by the registered clinical psychologist, who is also the principal investigator of the current study.

2.4. Assessment

Chinese version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (CESAS) (32, 33) was used in the current study as a measure of nine common symptoms experienced by cancer patients: pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being and shortness of breath. It has been shown to be reliable for symptom assessment in patients undergoing palliative care (34).

UCLA Loneliness Short (35), as an abbreviated version of the 20-item Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (36), is a 3-items scale used to rate the degree of loneliness by asking how often patients feel they lack companionship, feel left out, and feel isolated from others. Each item is rated from 0 to 3 on a numerical scale with 0 indicating Not at all, and 3 indicating Very often. Its Cantonese version (37) was used in this study.

Illness Identity Questionnaire (38) is a validated questionnaire to measure four aspects of illness identity: engulfment, rejection, acceptance, and enrichment. To address the research question, only the 8-item engulfment subscale was used. Each item is rated from 1 to 5 on a numerical scale with 1 indicating Strongly Disagree, and 5 indicating Strongly Agree. Standard translation-back translation procedure was used to translate it into Cantonese Chinese.

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy- Spiritual Wellbeing Scale (39) is a validated questionnaire to measure aspects of spirituality and/or faith that contributes to improving quality of life. It consists of 12 items which fall under three domains: meaning, peace, and faith (4042). Each item is rated from 0 to 4 on a numerical scale, with 0 indicating Not at all, and 4 indicating Very much. Only the 4-item peace subscale was used in this study to address the research question (i.e., whether VR exposure can enhance sense of peace), and to avoid overloading patients by keeping a realistic questionnaire length. Its Chinese version (43) (retrieved from https://www.facit.org/measures/FACIT-Sp-12) with granted license was used in this study.

Demographic and clinical variables, e.g., age, sex, education, medical diagnosis and treatment, were collected by retrieving from the medical records as well.

3. Results

Ms. W's self-rating of outcome measures are shown in Supplementary Table S2. FLOW-VRT-Relaxation was found to improve her palliative symptoms, i.e., reduced physical and emotional symptoms, sense of loneliness and engulfment, and increased level of peace. During consolidation phase, i.e., psychological interventions delivered after VR exposure, Ms. W reported that since she hadn't visited Japan before, such VR experience gave her the special opportunity to take a look at Japan. Surprisingly, it did not look like Japan that she imagined, but like Cheung Sha Wan, i.e., a city place in Hong Kong. Japan turned out to be less beautiful than she thought, which she found interesting to know. She was aware that she was physically in Hong Kong, but she “felt” like being there in Japan during VR exposure. Such VR exposure reminded her of her beloved home village in rural area of China where she had her most favorite food and trees. She would recommend VR to others as it carried no negative effects but positive experiences to her.

4. Discussions

In face of the mounting need of palliative care across the globe, timely intervention for effective symptom management is of pressing need. Despite the emergent clinical and research evidence for the efficacy and usability of VR relaxation in palliative care, there remains a big challenge of producing personalized, scalable and cost-effective VR for its wide adoption.

To address the clinical need, the current study developed a manualized and personalized VR relaxation intervention named FLOW-VRT-Relaxation as a novel psychological intervention in palliative care. It intends to fulfill patients' last wishes, facilitate sense of control, and allow immersive relaxation experience. Capitalized on the freely-available VR video, the current case study reveals the unlimited potential of delivering personalized FLOW-VRT-Relaxation with zero production cost and minimal time. Novel elements of FLOW-VRT-Relaxation include need assessment before VR, personalized VR relaxation content, real-time relaxation coached by a registered clinical psychologist, and psychological interventions delivered right after VR that help to consolidate the VR experience and enhance therapeutic effects.

Patient's responses in the current study appeared to be positive. After FLOW-VRT-Relaxation, the patient reported reduced physical and emotional symptoms, sense of loneliness and engulfment, as well as increased level of peace. Patient particularly highlighted the uniqueness of such intervention that provided a special opportunity to virtually fulfill her wish by “feeling” like travelling to Japan, with realization that her hometown was not less beautiful. Such a personalized VR experience appeared to address not only her unmet physical needs (e.g., pain), but also her psychological need of wish fulfillment in her end-of-life stage.

The current study has several limitations. Since it is impossible to make broad scientific conclusions based on the results of a single patient (44), case studies must be followed up with controlled studies. Although there are limitations in reporting findings from one single case, the positive experience of the patient aligned with those from previous research into VR traveling among patients under palliative care (1315). The results of the current feasibility study indicate that FLOW-VRT-Relaxation has potential without observation of contraindications. In light of the encouraging outcomes, in the next phase of this research program, we will begin to assess clinical outcome with a randomized controlled trial and a control arm.

Another limitation is that the patient was receiving medical treatment that might have led to improved symptoms. The use of a within-subjects design measuring outcomes right before and after FLOW-VRT-Relaxation was designed to isolate the effects of FLOW-VRT-Relaxation. Furthermore, since the death of patients under palliative care can be imminent, i.e., within a few hours or days (45), the present study only measured the short-term effect of FLOW-VRT-Relaxation. Although this patient reported immediate short-term benefits, long-term effect or skill development would be worthy of further investigations, e.g., continual relaxation practice during rehabilitation journey even without access to virtual reality.

Despite limitations, the current findings provide encouraging initial support for the feasibility, acceptability, and clinical potential of using FLOW-VRT-Relaxation under palliative care. With appropriate trainings, future implementation leaders may help increase the accessibility of such cost-effective psychological interventions in wider populations across different settings. It is hoped that with its optimal use, FLOW-VRT-Relaxation can serve as an alternative therapeutic tool that effectively improves the end-on-life care by addressing patients' physical and psychological needs.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by both the Human Research Ethics Committee, the University of Hong Kong, and the Joint CUHK-NTEC CREC (香港中文大學 – 新界東醫院聯網臨床研究倫理聯席委員會). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

OW and AL: research concept and design, statistical analysis, interpretation of data; OW: data acquisition and analysis, drafting of the manuscript; AL: supervision, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research was self-funded.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the participant in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1228781/full#supplementary-material

Footnote

1A prior survey was conducted interviewing patients under palliative care to ask them to report their most preferable places for relaxation. The results were collected till data saturation. The most popular relaxation places were scenery of mountain, lake, beach, forest, Japan Onsen, Japan Sakura, sky, and underwater world. Patients were also given the option “others” if they have preferable relaxation places other than the aforementioned eight places.

References

1. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer (1984).

2. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. (2000) 11:227–68. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Csikszentmihalyi M. Beyond boredom and anxiety. Washington: Jossey-Bass Publishers (1975).

4. Kaplan S. The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol. (1995) 15:169–82. doi: 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Kaplan S. Meditation, restoration and the management of mental fatigue. Environ Behav. (2001) 33:480–506. doi: 10.1177/00139160121973106

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. von Blanckenburg P, Leppin N. Psychological interventions in palliative care. Curr Opin Psychiatry. (2018) 31(5):389–95. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000441

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Wu V, Smith A, Girgis A. The unmet supportive care needs of Chinese patients and caregivers affected by cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). (2020) 31(6):e13269. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13269

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Wang T, Molassiotis A, Chung B, Tan J. Unmet care needs of advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care. (2018) 17(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0346-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Freeman D, Reeve S, Robinson A, Ehlers A, Clark D, Spanlang B, et al. Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders. Psychol Med. (2017) 47(14):2393–400. doi: 10.1017/S003329171700040X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Niki K, Okamoto Y, Maeda I, Mori I, Ishii R, Matsuda Y, et al. A novel palliative care approach using virtual reality for improving various symptoms of terminal cancer patients: a preliminary prospective, multicenter study. J Palliat Med. (2019) 22(6):72–707. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0527

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Johnson T, Bauler L, Vos D, Hifko A, Garg P, Ahmed M, et al. Virtual reality use for symptom management in palliative care: a pilot study to assess user perceptions. J Palliat Med. (2020) 23(9):1233–8. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0411

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Nwosu AC, Mills M, Roughneen S, Stanley S, Chapman L, Mason SR. Virtual reality in specialist palliative care: a feasibility study to enable clinical practice adoption. BMJ Support Palliat Care. (2021) bmjspcare-2020-002327. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002327. [Epub ahead of print]33597168

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Lloyd A, Haraldsdottir E. P-165 observations of immersive virtual reality sessions in a hospice. BMJ Support Palliat Care. (2019) 9(Suppl 4):A71. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-HUKNC.187

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Brungardt A, Wibben A, Tompkins AF, Shanbhag P, Coats H, LaGasse AB, et al. Virtual reality-based music therapy in palliative care: a pilot implementation trial. J Palliat Med. (2021) 24(5):736–42. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0403

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Weingarten K, Macapagal F, Parker D. Virtual reality: endless potential in pediatric palliative care: a case report. J Palliat Med. (2019) 23(1):147–9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0207

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Baños RM, Espinoza M, García-Palacios A, Cervera JM, Esquerdo G, Barrajón E, et al. A positive psychological intervention using virtual reality for patients with advanced cancer in a hospital setting: a pilot study to assess feasibility. Support Care Cancer. (2013) 21(1):263–70. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1520-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Bani Mohammad E, Ahmad M. Virtual reality as a distraction technique for pain and anxiety among patients with breast cancer: a randomized control trial. Palliat Support Care. (2019) 17(1):29–34. doi: 10.1017/S1478951518000639

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Espinoza M, Baños RM, García-Palacios A, Cervera JM, Esquerdo G, Barrajón E, et al. Promotion of emotional wellbeing in oncology inpatients using VR. Stud Health Technol Inform. (2012) 181:53–7. PMID: 2295482822954828

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

19. Ferguson C, Shade MY, Blaskewicz Boron J, Lyden E, Manley NA. Virtual reality for therapeutic recreation in dementia hospice care: a feasibility study. Am J Hospice Palliat Med. (2020) 37(10):809–15. doi: 10.1177/1049909120901525

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Schneider SM, Prince-Paul M, Allen MJ, Silverman P, Talaba D. Virtual reality as a distraction intervention for women receiving chemotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum. (2004) 31(1):81–8. doi: 10.1188/04.ONF.81-88

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Gershon J, Zimand E, Pickering M, Rothbaum BO, Hodges L. A pilot study and feasibility study of virtual reality as a distraction for children with cancer. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2004) 43(10):1243–9. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000135621.23145.05

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Kenney MP, Milling LS. The effectiveness of virtual reality distraction for reducing pain: a meta-analysis. Psychol Conscious. (2016) 3(3):199–210. doi: 10.1037/cns0000084

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Windich-Biermeier A, Sjoberg I, Dale JC, Eshelman D, Guzzetta CE. Effects of distraction on pain, fear, and distress during venous port access and venipuncture in children and adolescents with cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. (2007) 24(1):8–19. doi: 10.1177/1043454206296018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Wittkopf PG, Lloyd DM, Coe O, Yacoobali S, Billington J. The effect of interactive virtual reality on pain perception: a systematic review of clinical studies. Disabil Rehabil. (2020) 42(26):3722–33. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1610803

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Wolitzky K, Fivush R, Zimand E, Hodges L, Rothbaum BO. Effectiveness of virtual reality distraction during a painful medical procedure in pediatric oncology patients. Psychol Health. (2005) 20(6):817–24. doi: 10.1080/14768320500143339

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Yates JS, Mustian KM, Morrow GR, Gillies LJ, Padmanaban D, Atkins JN, et al. Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use in cancer patients during treatment. Support Care Cancer. (2005) 13(10):806–11. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0770-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Anderson AP, Mayer MD, Fellows AM, Cowan DR, Hegel MT, Buckey JC. Relaxation with immersive natural scenes presented using virtual reality. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. (2017) 88:520–6. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4747.2017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Ma L, Mor S, Anderson P, Baños R, Botella C, Bouchard S, et al. Integrating virtual realities and psychotherapy: SWOT analysis on VR and MR based treatments of anxiety and stress-related disorders. Cogn Behav Ther. (2021) 50(6):509–26. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2021.1939410

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Pizzoli S, Mazzocco K, Triberti S, Monzani D, Alcañiz Raya M, Pravettoni G. User-centered virtual reality for promoting relaxation: an innovative approach. Front Psychol. (2019) 10:479. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00479

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Coelho T, Marques C, Moreira D, Soares M, Portugal P, Marques A, et al. Promoting reminiscences with virtual reality headsets: a pilot study with people with dementia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17(24):9301. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249301

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Zeng Y, Zhang J-E, Cheng ASK, Cheng H, Wefel JS. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of virtual reality–based interventions in cancer-related symptom management. Integr Cancer Ther. (2019) 18:1534735419871108. doi: 10.1177/1534735419871108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Dong Y, Chen H, Zheng Y, Guo Y, Kwon JH, Liu E, et al. Psychometric validation of the edmonton symptom assessment system in Chinese patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. (2015) 50(5):712–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.05.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller M, Macmillan K. The Edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care. (1991) 7:6–9. doi: 10.1177/082585979100700202

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Watanabe S, Nekolaichuk C, Beaumont C. The Edmonton symptom assessment system, a proposed tool for distress screening in cancer patients: development and refinement. Psychooncology. (2012) 21(9):977–85. doi: 10.1002/pon.1996

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: results from two population based studies. Res Aging. (2004) 26:655–72. doi: 10.1177/0164027504268574

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Russell D, Peplau L, Cutrona C. The revised UCLA loneliness scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol. (1980) 39(3):472–80. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Liu T, Lu S, Leung DKY, Sze LCY, Kwok WW, Tang JYM, et al. Adapting the UCLA 3-item loneliness scale for community-based depressive symptoms screening interview among older Chinese: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. (2020) 10(12):e041921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041921

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Oris L, Luyckx K, Rassart J, Goubert L, Goossens E, Apers S, et al. Illness identity in adults with a chronic illness. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. (2018) 25(4):429–40. doi: 10.1007/s10880-018-9552-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Peterman AH, Fitchett G, Brady MJ, Hernandez L, Cella D. Measuring spiritual wellbeing in people with cancer: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy? Spiritual wellbeing scale (FACIT-Sp). Ann Behav Med. (2002) 24(1):49–58. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_06

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Canada AL, Murphy PE, Fitchett G, Peterman AH, Schover LR. A 3-factor model for the FACIT-Sp. Psychooncology. (2008) 17(9):908–16. doi: 10.1002/pon.1307

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Murphy PE, Canada AL, Fitchett G, Stein K, Portier K, Crammer C, et al. An examination of the 3-factor model and structural invariance across racial/ethnic groups for the FACIT-Sp: a report from the American cancer society’s study of cancer survivors-II (SCS-II). Psychooncology. (2010) 19(3):264–72. doi: 10.1002/pon.1559

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Peterman AH, Reeve CL, Winford EC, Cotton S, Salsman JM, McQuellon R, et al. Measuring meaning and peace with the FACIT–spiritual well-being scale: distinction without a difference? Psychol Assess. (2014) 26(1):127–37. doi: 10.1037/a0034805

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Xiangyu L, Di W, Yongyi C, Qin-qin C, Sai L, Xiang-hua X, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-spiritual well-being in cancer patients. Chin J Nurs. (2016) 51:1085–90.

Google Scholar

44. Campbell DT, Stanley JC. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company (1963).

45. General Medical Council of the United Kingdom. Treatment and care towards the end of life: good practice in decision making (2010). Available at: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/treatment-and-care-towards-the-end-of-life—english-1015_pdf-48902105.pdf?la=en&hash=41EF651C76FDBEC141FB674C08261661BDEFD004

Keywords: virtual reality, palliative care, relaxation, FLOW-VRT, personalized, FLOW-VRT-Relaxation

Citation: Woo OKL and Lee AM (2023) Case report: Therapeutic potential of Flourishing-Life-Of-Wish Virtual Reality Therapy on Relaxation (FLOW-VRT-Relaxation)—a novel personalized relaxation in palliative care. Front. Digit. Health 5:1228781. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1228781

Received: 25 May 2023; Accepted: 7 August 2023;
Published: 22 August 2023.

Edited by:

Sylvie Bernaerts, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Belgium

Reviewed by:

Orestis Giotakos, Independent researcher, Athens, Greece
Kazuyuki Niki, Osaka University, Japan

© 2023 Woo and Lee. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Olive K. L. Woo olivewookitling@gmail.com wkl049@ha.org.hk

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.