What have we learnt from histology about the efficacy of coronary imaging modalities in assessing plaque composition?

Accurate evaluation of coronary artery pathology is essential for risk stratification and tailoring appropriate treatment. Intravascular imaging was introduced for this purpose 40 years ago enabling for the first time in vivo plaque characterization. Since then, several studies have evaluated the efficacy of the existing intravascular imaging modalities in assessing plaque pathology and composition and their potential in guiding intervention and predicting vulnerable plaques. Today it is known that intravascular imaging is an indispensable tool in percutaneous coronary intervention planning, but the existing modalities have a limited efficacy in predicting lesion vulnerability; a fact that should be attributed to their advantages and limitations in accurately assessing morpho-pathological features that are common in advanced atherosclerotic plaques. This review aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the performance of intravascular imaging in characterizing plaque phenotypes using histology as a reference standard; it summarizes the studies comparing the available invasive imaging techniques against histology, discusses the findings and limitations of these studies and highlights the potential of novel intravascular imaging approaches that were introduced for a more complete and comprehensive evaluation of plaque pathobiology.

Introduction

Andreas Grüntzig not only introduced percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) establishing a less invasive alternative for treating coronary artery disease but also showed the feasibility of the in vivo instrumentation of the coronary arteries with pressure catheters to measure vessel physiology (1). His pioneering work inspired engineers towards the development of intravascular catheters that allow real-time evaluation of plaque pathology and physiology enabling a better understanding of atherosclerotic evolution. Yock, taking advantage of his previous research experience in the navy, was the first that built an invasive coronary imaging modality—i.e., the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)—that provided in vivo assessment of plaque characteristics (2). The preliminary applications of IVUS in clinical practice generated hopes that invasive imaging would be able to detect vulnerable plaques and guide therapy in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease and drive research and industry towards the development of alternative invasive imaging modalities that could provide additional information about plaque morphology. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was introduced a decade after the first applications of IVUS and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) combined with IVUS a decade later to allow for the first time in vivo detection of plaque burden and biochemical composition.

These three modalities have been extensively used in the clinical practice and research to evaluate atheroma characteristics and optimise treatment planning and today there is robust evidence that support its routine use in complex PCI to reduce major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (3–5). Conversely, studies that have explored the value of IVUS, OCT and NIRS-IVUS to detect vulnerable lesions have demonstrated that these modalities can detect plaques that are prone to progress and cause events, however, with a limited accuracy and a positive predictive value that is <20% casting doubts about their value in risk stratification and vulnerable plaque detection (6). The limited efficacy of invasive imaging to predict atherosclerotic disease progression has been attributed to the complex pathophysiology of the disease that is regulated by systemic factors, the coagulation properties of the blood, local factors such as the distribution of the haemodynamic forces, and also to the fact that invasive imaging has limitations in accurately detecting specific morphological features that are seen in vulnerable plaques (7). The latter factor has driven research towards the design of advanced multimodality imaging catheters for a more comprehensive and complete evaluation of atheroma phenotypes.

This review paper aims to provide an overview of the histology studies that examined the performance of IVUS, OCT, and NIRS-IVUS in characterising plaque pathology, present the novel invasive imaging technologies introduced to overcome the limitations of the first intravascular imaging catheters, and summarize the results of preliminary histology studies that tested the performance of these approaches in detecting plaque features associated with increased vulnerability.

Intravascular ultrasound imaging

Grayscale intravascular ultrasound

The ability of IVUS to assess atherosclerotic disease severity and quantify the lumen and plaque dimensions became apparent from the first validation studies comparing the estimations of this modality against histology (8). However, the performance of IVUS to accurately characterise plaque composition and detect the presence of lipid tissue has been questioned. Preliminary reports have shown that the intensity of the ultrasound signal within the plaque provides information about tissue composition with areas of grayscale intensity lower than that of the adventitia corresponding to lipid tissue, those with areas similar to that of the adventitia to fibrotic, and those with higher than that of the adventitia and acoustic shadowing behind corresponding to calcific tissue (Figures 1, 2) (9). This tissue characterization approach has been incorporated into a user-friendly software called echogenicity, that allows automated characterization of plaque composition based on the grayscale intensity of the pixels constituting the plaque. A histology study in pigs has shown that this approach enables accurate characterization of the plaque composition however the first validation in cadaveric human hearts cast doubts about its efficacy in detecting plaque components (10, 11).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Ideal standalone and hybrid intravascular imaging modality for assessing plaque characteristics using histology as reference standard. Modalities with good performance in detecting a specific plaque feature are indicated with dark red and those with moderate performance with a bright red colour. Photoacoustic image of necrotic core courtesy of Jansen et al. (10.1016/j.pacs.2013.11.003). OCT-NIRS image of thin fibrous cap courtesy of Ali et al. (10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101344). OCT-NIRF image of macrophages and cholesterol crystals, FLIm-OCT image of thin fibrous cap, IVPA-IVUS image of neovessels, NIRS-IVUS OCT-NIRS and IVPA-IVUS images of necrotic core courtesy of Tufaro et al. (10.1016/j.jcin.2024.07.007).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Case examples showing a fibrotic, calcific and lipid-rich plaque on IVUS and OCT images and the corresponding histological sections stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Calcific plaque on IVUS and OCT is indicated by red asterisks and lipid on IVUS and OCT is indicated by yellow asterisks.

More recent studies, however, have provided evidence supporting the validity of pixel intensity in characterizing plaque types. A report including 2,294 IVUS frames matched with histology showed that the presence of echo-lucent plaques (defined as plaques with a pixel intensity smaller than that of the adventitia) and of attenuated plaque (defined as plaques with signal attenuation without the presence of calcific tissue) was associated with the presence of a necrotic core on histology. However, these features had limited efficacy in detecting a necrotic core with a low sensitivity (56.2% for the attenuated plaques and 20.5% for the echolucent plaques) but a high specificity (94.7% for the attenuated plaques and 90.4% for the echolucent plaques) (Table 1) (12).

Table 1

Table 1. Histology studies assessing the efficacy of intravascular imaging modalities in characterizing plaque morphology using human histology data as reference standard.

To overcome the limitations of greyscale IVUS to assess plaque composition, processing of the amplitude and the frequency of the reflected IVUS has been proposed. Three different approaches have been introduced for the radiofrequency analysis of the IVUS data: virtual histology (VH)-IVUS that uses autoregressive models to classify tissue types, integrated backscatter (IB) analysis that applies fast Fourier transformation to process the IVUS data, and iMAP that also relies on the identification of 40 spectral features in IVUS using autoregressive modelling and their comparison against the IVUS data obtained from typical plaques (13).

Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound

VH-IVUS can differentiate four tissue types: necrotic core, fibrofatty, fibrous and calcific tissue that are colour-coded displayed (red, light green, green and red and white). The first studies assessing the efficacy of VH-IVUS to characterise plaque composition showed promising results (14, 15). The tissue distribution in VH-IVUS was used to define for the first time in vivo plaque phenotypes whose vulnerability was tested in subsequent prospective studies (16).

However, more recent histology studies in porcine models published over the last decade cast doubts about the efficacy of VH-IVUS in assessing tissue composition (10, 17). This was also confirmed in a study performed in hearts obtained from patients listed for transplantation (n = 642 matched cross sections) which showed that VH-IVUS has a high sensitivity (94%), but low specificity (53%) and positive predictive value (48%) in detecting necrotic core. Today this technology has been withdrawn and is not clinically available (18).

Integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound analysis

Integrated backscatter IVUS (IB-IVUS) analysis is currently available only in Japan. Ex vivo validation of this approach has shown that IB-IVUS has high accuracy in detecting plaque composition (19). However, the study of Kawasaki et al. which included 42 coronary arteries from 17 cadavers studied both by IB-IVUS and OCT, showed that both approaches had high sensitivity and specificity in detecting tissue types, but OCT was superior to IB-IVUS (20). Moreover, a recent report including coronary arteries from 14 human autopsy hearts assessed both by OCT and IB-IVUS (360 sections) demonstrated that IB-IVUS had a weak positive predictive value of only 50% but a high negative predictive value of 98.2% in detecting thin cap fibroatheromas (TCFA). In this study, the positive and negative predictive values of OCT were 60.9% and 98.8% respectively. Combining IB-IVUS and OCT, the positive and negative predictive values increased to 100% and 97.7% (21). These findings highlight the additive value of combined imaging in assessing plaque phenotypes. The IB-IVUS have been incorporated in the combined IVUS-OCT system designed by Terumo that is expected to be introduced in the clinical practice in 2025 (22).

iMap

iMap has been validated in a single histology study showing that this approach is valuable in detecting tissue types (23). However, an in vivo study comparing iMAP-IVUS and IB-IVUS showed a weak agreement between the two approaches to characterise plaque composition (24). Today iMap is not clinically available.

Optical coherence tomography

OCT was introduced for the study of the coronary arteries by professor Fujimoto at the end of the last century (25). This modality has a higher resolution than IVUS allowing more detailed visualization of plaque morphology and lumen pathology than IVUS. The first extensive histology validation of OCT was reported in 2002 and included arterial segments (n = 357, 162 aortas, 105 carotids, and 90 coronary arteries) from 90 cadavers. The authors found that OCT enables accurate characterization of all plaque types with high sensitivity (≥95%for calcific plaque, ≥71% for fibrous, and ≥90% for lipid-rich plaques) and specificity (97% for calcific plaque, ≥97% for fibrous, and ≥90% for lipid-rich plaques respectively) (26). Three years later Jang et al. demonstrated the feasibility of OCT in vivo and underscored its potential to visualize different plaque phenotypes in patients with an acute and chronic coronary syndrome (27).

Since then several studies have compared and underscored the superiority of OCT over IVUS using histology as reference standard especially in the detection of the lipid compoent (Figure 3) (20, 21, 28–30).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Summary of the average performance of the imaging techniques that are currently available in clinical practice to assess plaque composition. The pie charts summarise the number of studies that tested the performance of each imaging modality in assessing plaque types. The blue colour indicates the studies that allowed measurement of the performance metrics of each modality while the red the studies that did not allow computation of the sensitivity, specificity, positive, negative predictive value, and accuracy for each modality.

In addition, Kume et al. demonstrated that OCT, in contrast to IVUS, can visualize vessel wall architecture and portray the intima, media, and adventitia layers in disease-free vessels but on the other hand, it is widely acknowledged that OCT can often fail to assess the entire plaque and measure the plaque burden in heavily diseased segments as it has limited signal penetration (1–2 mm within the plaque) (31)

Conversely, the high resolution of OCT has enabled for the first time in vivo assessment of plaque microfeatures that have been associated with increased vulnerability and could not be detected by IVUS. Numerous histology studies have shown that the vulnerable plaques that cause events have an increased plaque burden, a large necrotic core component that is covered by a thin fibrous cap, and is rich in macrophages, neovessels, and cholesterol crystals (32–35).

Kume et al. were the first to investigate the performance of OCT in measuring fibrous thickness. The authors included 102 arterial segments from 38 human cadaveric hearts and compared the estimations of OCT against histology. They found a high correlation (r = 0.90, p < 0.001) but also a significant bias and wide limits of agreement between OCT estimations and histology (24 ± 44 µm). In addition, the authors reported a relatively high inter (13 ± 41 μm) and intra-observer (20 ± 59 μm) variability which can affect the differentiation of thin cap from thick cap fibroatheromas (36). More recent studies have looked into the limitations of OCT to accurately measure cap thickness and showed that the poor definition of the proximal edge of the necrotic core, the presence of macrophages and calcific tissue, as well as deeply embedded lipid tissue can affect the accurate delineation of the fibrous cap thickness (37). This limitation was partially overcome by the design of commercially available software that can automatically detect the fibrous cap border and reproducibly report its thickness (38).

OCT is the only clinically available intravascular imaging modality that can provide information about vascular inflammation. This was demonstrated in the early days of OCT by Tearney et al. who focused on the quantification of the macrophage content in the fibrous cap covering fibroatheromas. In this pivotal study including matched histological and OCT cross-sections the authors showed that increased OCT signal intensity was strongly associated with macrophage density (r = 0.83, p < 0001) (39). Di Vito et al. few years later, provided further evidence about the value of OCT to identify macrophages and introduced a two-step algorithm for automated macrophages detection. The algorithm included a size filter of structures and an OCT signal intensity metric and was validated against histology in 43 cross sections; the authors found an excellent performance of this approach to identify macrophages (sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 96.8% respectively) (40). However these findings were not confirmed in a larger study including 1,599 matched histological and OCT images. The authors implemented an automated method to detect bright spots in the entire plaque and showed that only 57% of the bright spots corresponded to macrophage accumulation in histology (other causes of bright spots in OCT included fibrous tissue, the interfaces between calcium and fibrous tissue, calcium and lipid deposits and fibrous caps and lipid tissue). Another interesting finding of this analysis was the fact that the macrophages in histology often appear as dark spots in OCT. Nevertheless, when analysis focused on the fibrous caps, they demonstrated a high accuracy of the modality with 94.3% of the bright spots detected by the algorithm corresponding to the presence of macrophages (41). Irrespective of these results the presence of macrophages in OCT seems to provide useful prognostic information as shown in the CLIMA study where inflamed plaques were associated with a higher rate of death or myocardial infarction (42).

Cholesterol crystals appear to play an important role in the biology of vulnerable plaques and studies have shown that they can contribute to their destabilization (35). In OCT, cholesterol crystals appear as thin, linear regions of high intensity (Figure 1). Two studies have examined the efficacy of OCT in detecting cholesterol crystals; the first included 45 matched histological and OCT cross-sections and showed that OCT was capable of correctly identifying these micro-structures with a moderate sensitivity but high specificity (68% and 92% respectively) (43). The second, was a much larger study including 559 matched OCT and histology sections; in this report a cholesterol crystal was defined as linear discrete high-intensity signal within the plaque with sharp borders that was adjacent to low/intermediate intensity tissue. Using this definition, the sensitivity of OCT was low, but the specificity was excellent (25.6% and 100% respectively) for detecting cholesterol crystals. The presence of multiple crystals and the morphological features of adjacent tissues and in particular an overlying fibrous cap were associated with a better accuracy of OCT to identify these plaques (44).

It has been speculated that OCT with its high resolution will be able to identify neo-vessels however, there is limited evidence about its efficacy in identifying these features. In a small histology study of 55 coronary plaques time-domain, OCT was able to detect neovascularization with a moderate sensitivity and specificity of 52% and 68%, respectively (45). There is no data today about the efficacy of frequency domain OCT which has a higher penetration than time domain OCT and is likely to have a better performance in assessing plaque pathology.

Most recently, Gruslova et al. examined the accuracy of seven OCT Core Labs in identifying plaque phenotypes and components. The authors demonstrated an overall moderate agreement between the core labs in assessing plaque features (mean kappa:0.67 ± 0.07); the core labs performed well in identifying fibrotic and calcific plaques, but they had a moderate performance in detecting thick cap fibroatheromas. A weak overall performance was noted between core lab estimations and histology for plaque features associated with increased vulnerability such as lipid tissue, necrotic core, TCFA, macrophages, and calcific nodules (46).

Summarizing the above, it is apparent that OCT is superior to IVUS in assessing plaque composition and biology, but it has inherent limitations in identifying all the plaque features related to increased vulnerability (Figures 2–3; Table 1). To overcomes these limitations polarization-sensitive OCT (PS-OCT) which allows assessment of the polarization state of the reflected OCT signal was proposed to better characterize atherosclerotic plaque components (47). The birefringence and depolarization measurements obtained by PS-OCT seem to provide incremental information about tissue types; however, the added value of this technique over conventional OCT in detecting vulnerable plaques has not been tested yet.

Near infrared spectroscopy

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has extensively been used in chemistry to identify organic substances. It relies on the fact that different molecules can absorb and scatter the NIR light at different intensities and wavelengths. In the study of atherosclerosis, NIRS was used for the first time by Cassis and Lodder to assess plaque composition in rabbits (48), while the first application of this modality in humans was 3 years later by Dempsey et al. who tested its feasibility in detecting lipid tissue in carotids (49).

Moreno et al. provided additional evidence about the efficacy of NIRS to detect the presence of lipid tissue and vascular inflammation in human aortas whereas the first appropriately powered study that examined the value of NIRS to assess plaque composition in the coronary arteries was conducted by Gardner et al. and included coronary segments from 84 autopsy hearts (50, 51). The authors used the first 33 to refine the performance of NIRS to detect necrotic core plaques while the remaining 51 were used to validate it. They demonstrated that the block chemogram that summarizes the probability of the presence of lipid tissue in 2 mm segments was able to identify large necrotic cores—defined as those with circumferential extent >60° located in the superficial plaque with cap thickness <450 μm—with an area under the curve of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76–0.85) (51, 52).

A subsequent analysis of thise data focusing on the performance of NIRS to characterise plaque phenotype demonstrated a low sensitivity but high specificity of NIRS to identify the presence of fibroatheromas that was attributed to the limited efficacy of the modality in detecting small necrotic cores, while the false positive NIRS estimations were attributed to the lipid component seen in lesions classified as pathological intimal thickening (53). Similar findings were seen in the study of Puri et al. which showed that NIRS was able to detect fibroatheromas with a moderate accuracy (c-index: 0.71) that increased to 0.80 when NIRS was combined with the information provided by IVUS (54). Finally, Inaba et al. explored the efficacy of NIRS in detecting TCFA and showed that a maximum lipid core burden index in a 4 mm segment ≥323—which indicates the fraction of pixels over 1,000 that corresponds to lipid tissue in a 4 mm segment with the largest lipid component—had an excellent accuracy in detecting this phenotype (AUC: 0.84) (54).

Summarizing the findings of these studies, it is apparent that NIRS has a high diagnostic accuracy in identifying lipid tissue; however, this modality cannot visualize the lumen and vessel wall, quantify the plaque burden, and provide depth information about the location of the lipid tissue in the plaque (Figure 3; Table 2). To overcome these limitations NIRS has been combined with an IVUS probe (TC Imaging System™ and Makoto Intravascular Imaging System™, Infraredx) in a hybrid NIRS-IVUS system; this prototype can assess lumen morphology and atheroma burden and in a recent histology study it has been shown that the circumferential location of the lipid tissue given by NIRS, and the pixel intensity of the plaque provided on IVUS allows accurate estimation of the lipid tissue distribution in the plaque (55).

Table 2

Table 2. Efficacy of invasive imaging modalities that provide an assessment of the biochemical composition of the plaque and of plaque biology in characterizing plaques characteristics using human histology data as reference standard.

More recently a hybrid OCT-NIRS probe was introduced that has undergone a first in-man study (56). Both systems have FDA approval for the detection of patients at risk of suffering MACE.

Near-infrared fluorescence imaging

Near-infrared fluorescence imaging (NIRF) has emerged as a translational intravascular modality for assessing plaque pathobiology. Imaging relies on the injection of specialized imaging agents which can bind molecules associated with specific biological processes and can fluoresce after being irradiated with NIR light.

Several animal studies have provided unique insights into the efficacy of this modality in assessing plaque activity. Today it is known that NIRF can detect, depending on the injected marker, macrophages accumulation, ICAM-1 an unpolymerized type I collagen, protease activity, and fibrin following stent implantation (57–59). Moreover, the study of Aikawa et al. underscored the value of NIRF to detect osteogenesis in mice using the activatable marker OsteoSense750 and reported a link between vascular inflammation and osteogenic activity in human plaques obtained following carotid endarterectomy (60). In addition, the BRIGHT-CEA study involving human specimens from carotid endarterectomy has shown that NIRF imaging, after injection of indocyanine green can detect an impaired endothelial integrity, including disrupted fibrous caps, areas of neovascularization, macrophages, lipid tissue, and intraplaque haemorrhages (57).

The first-in-man study examining the feasibility of NIRF imaging used a hybrid OCT-NIRF catheter and demonstrated that some plaques have the ability to auto fluoresce (NIRAF) without the need to inject activatable markers (61). Recent histology studies have provided further insights into the phenomenon with consistent results. The study of Albaghdadi et al., which included 15 human carotid endarterectomy specimens, demonstrated that NIRAF was associated with intraplaque haemorrhage (r = 0.48, P = 0.043) and lipid—specifically insoluble lipid or ceroid (r = 0.53, P = 0.023) (62). Similar were the findings of another study from the same research group that included coronary arteries from 31 fresh human donated hearts which showed that autofluorescence was associated with the presence of intraplaque haemorrhage and insoluble lipid or ceroid and that the association was stronger between autofluorescence and ceroid than intraplaque haemorrhage (63). The NIRF studies highlighted are summarised in Table 2.

NIRF has been combined with IVUS or OCT catheters in hybrid intravascular systems that are expected to enable anatomical and biological characterization of coronary atheroma, Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan has invested in the commercialization of NIRF-OCT imaging which is anticipated to become clinically available in the following years.

Fluorescence lifetime imaging

Fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIm) has been introduced to assess the biochemical composition of the superficial plaque. Imaging with this modality relies on the fact that different molecules can fluoresce for a specific time period after being irradiated with NIR light. Animal studies confirmed that measurement of the fluorescence time allows assessment of plaque composition and vascular inflammation (64, 65).

The potential of FLIm imaging is also supported by histology studies in human cadaveric hearts. In the study by Fatakdawala et al., combined IVUS and FLIm were used to characterise plaque morphology in 87 histological sections from 16 human coronary arteries; the authors showed that FLIm imaging had a superior sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in assessing plaque phenotypes than standalone IVUS (70%, 98, 88% vs. 45%, 94% and 62% respectively). Combined FLIm-IVUS imaging outperformed standalone imaging in assessing plaque morphology (sensitivity 89%, specificity 99%, and accyracy 89%, respectively) (Table 2) (66). These results were also confirmed by a histology study including 47 segments obtained from human hearts that were imaged by a multimodal FLIm-OCT system. FLIm-OCT imaging was able to accurately detect 89.4% of the plaques underscoring the potential of hybrid-FLIm based imaging to assess plaque phenotypes (67).

In line with these findings a recent report including 32 human coronary artery segments assessed by combined IVUS-FLIm showed that FLIm was capable of accurately detecting superficial calcium (ROC-AUC: 0.90) and macrophages with high accuracy (ROC-AUC: 0.94) (68). The efficacy of FLIm to detect vascular inflammation was also confirmed by the study of Rico-Jimenez et al. that included 80 fresh post-mortem coronary segments from 23 autopsy hearts and showed that FLIm imaging was very accurate in identifying macrophages in the superficial plaque with an accuracy of 91.5% (69). The relevant studies of FLIm are summarised in Table 2.

FLIm imaging has been combined with OCT in a hybrid multimodality imaging probe developed by the Dotter Inc Seoul Korea that has been recently tested in clinical practice (NCT04835467). There is also a combined IVUS-FLIm catheter system that has an external diameter of 3.7Fr and is pulled back at a maximum speed of 4 mm/s. Imaging with this system requires blood clearance with bolus flushing; therefore, the maximum length that can be studied with this system is rather limiting. This constraint as well as the large diameter of the catheter has not enabled its application in the clinical arena (70).

Intravascular photoacoustic imaging

Intravascular photoacoustic (IVPA) imaging relies on the processing of the acoustic signal that is produced after the thermal expansion of molecules that have been irradiated with laser-light. In contrast to the NIRS, NIRF, and FLIm, IVPA provides depth information of tissue distribution by measuring the time interval between tissue irradiation and the IVPA signal.

Several experimental and animal studies have demonstrated the potential of IVPA to detect lipid tissue, collagen and metallic struts, as well as vascular inflammation and endothelial integrity when imaging is performed after injection of specific agents that are able to bind molecules that regulate plaque biology (71–75).

There is limited evidence about the performance of IVPA to characterize plaque morphology using ex vivo human data as reference standard. Reports involving a single coronary artery have shown the feasibility of this modality to detect lipid tissue (76), while Arabul et al. has shown that IVPA can identify intraplaque haemorrhages in atherosclerotic carotid plaques obtained following endarterectomy (77).

IVPA has been combined with IVUS imaging in hybrid IVPA-IVUS systems that enables evaluation of lumen and plaque dimensions and characterization of its composition. Several prototypes have been presented over the last few years for combined IVPA-IVUS imaging, however none of them has reached the clinical practice (78, 79). Kaminari Medical B.V., Rotterdam Netherlands is a recently developed company that aims to overcome limitations of previous revisions and design an hybrid IVPA-IVUS catheter for clinical applications. (https://kaminarimedical.com).

Discussion

From the early days of intravascular imaging, histology-based studies have been used to test the performance of existing and emerging modalities in evaluating vessel wall pathology and appreciate their potential in the clinical practice and research. These studies by identifying the advantages and limitations of each modality have helped in the evolution of intravascular imaging and guide the development of novel approaches that will outperform the existing techniques.

Today it is acknowledged that none of the available modalities is able to provide a complete and detailed visualization of plaque pathology. Therefore, there is a trend these days to design hybrid intravascular imaging systems that will incorporate two different imaging probes with complementary strengths for more detailed characterization of plaque pathobiology. The combined IVUS-OCT system as well as the NIRS-IVUS, OCT-NIRS, OCT-NIRF, FLIm-OCT and IVPA-IVUS are typical examples (34, 80, 81).

Preliminary validations studies of these systems using histology as reference standard have provided proof of the consensus showing that these approaches outperform standalone intravascular imaging systems in assessing plaque types (Figure 4) (55, 82). Histology is the gold standard for assessing plaque composition, however, the obvious requirement for intact coronary vessels to be used in these studies limits validation to model systems only, all of which have their drawbacks. Firstly, different vascular beds have different characteristics; for example, the carotid vessels have different elastic and smooth muscle composition to coronary vessels. In addition, cadaveric analysis from anatomy departments is compromised by their prior fixation and the fresh vessels from explanted recipient hearts or even post- mortem are compromised due to the extended period prior to sampling.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Panorama of hybrid intravascular imaging modalities and the corresponding histology. (Ai) An OCT-NIRF frame obtained after indocyanine green (ICG) injection showing increased uptake at (red arrowhead) in a lesion with intimal and medial calcification (yellow arrowheads) that was also confirmed by the corresponding fluorescence microscopy image (Aii). (Bi) NIRF-IVUS image showcasing high ICG-concentrations (red box) spatially related to a lipid and infiltrated macrophages as seen in the corresponding Oil Red O (ORO)-stained (Bii; red dotted box) and CD68-stained histological section (Biii; red dotted box) respectively. (Ci) An OCT-FLIM imaging with increased 540-nm lifetime values that correspond to pathological intimal thickening as seen in Movat's pentachrome-stained histology (Cii; PIT) and macrophages accumulation (*) that were confirmed by CD68-stained histology (Ciii). (Di) FLIM-IVUS cross-section demonstrating the presence of lipid tissue detected by FLIm in a calcified plaque confirmed by IVUS and the corresponding histology section stained with Movat's pentachrome showing a mixed plaque (Dii). (Ei) IVPA-IVUS frame portaying a lipid-rich plaque indicated with red-orange overlay. The corresponding ORO-stained histology confirms a large necrotic core (Eii). Image (Bi–Biii) courtesy of Rauschendorfer et al. (10.1038/s44325-024-00016-8). Image (Ci–Ciii) courtesy of Li et al. (10.1117/1.JBO.27.7.076005). Image (Ai,Aii), (Di,Dii), (Ei,Eii) courtesy of Tufaro et al. (10.1016/j.jcin.2024.07.007).

Other limitations of the studies assessing the performance of standalone intravascular imaging modalities include the fact that: (1) they are not appropriate powered, (2) they don't have a specific primary endpoint, (3) they often include a small number of matched frames that do not allow us to draw safe conclusions, (4) the matching of the intravascular imaging and histology data can be challenging and affect the final results, and (5) the tissue shrinkage that occurs during histological preparation that does not allow us to accurately test the performance of intravascular imaging to quantify plaque burden and composition. Moreover, in most of the histology studies a single histological staining was used that does not enable a complete evaluation of plaque pathology and is likely to influence image interpretation. Finally, the reproducibility of the clinicians and the histopathologists who performed the analyses is not always reported even though it can influence the results (83, 84).

It is therefore essential to standardize analyses protocols and perform large prospective histopathological based studies that will be appropriately powered and will facilitate—using landmarks—the intravascular imaging and histology sections matching and will make use of multiplex immunohistochemistry and 3D based histology so as to appreciate the full potential of each modality to assess plaque pathology. This approach will allow us to better understand the potential of the existing catheters, identify their limitations, and design future prototypes that will combine multiple imaging probes to address the current clinical needs (i.e., optimal PCI planning and vulnerable plaque detection) and improve clinical outcomes.

These datasets can be also used to train and test the performance of deep learning (DL) classifiers that will allow fast, accurate and reproducible characterization of plaque phenotypes. Proof of concepts studies have highlighted the potential of DL methods in the analysis of intravascular imaging data (55, 85–87). However, the small number of histological sections included, the use of a single stain and limitations in the co-registration of intravascular imaging and histology have not allowed us to explore the full potential of DL in this setting. There is therefore an unmet need to generate large optimal intravascular-histological imaging data that will be stained with multiple stains enabling thorough assessment of plaque characteristics and use these to develop efficient DL solutions that will allow enhanced tissue characterization reliable assessment of plaque vulnerability and more accurate risk stratification.

This strategy may also be helpful in the optimization of the deep learning solutions that have been introduced to analyze computerized tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) data and unlock the full potential of CTCA in the study of atherosclerosis, enable more precise detection of vulnerable plaque, and quantification of the lumen and vessel dimensions that are essential in treatment planning (88–91).

Author contributions

NY: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Formal Analysis. ZK: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Formal Analysis, Investigation. XH: Writing – review & editing. JL: Writing – review & editing. SM: Writing – review & editing. KM: Writing – review & editing. TZ: Writing – review & editing. HP: Resources, Writing – review & editing. PS: Writing – review & editing. HG-G: Writing – review & editing. YO: Writing – review & editing. SH: Writing – review & editing. SK: Writing – review & editing. AM: Writing – review & editing. AB: Writing – review & editing. CB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Meier B. His master’s art, Andreas Grüntzig’s approach to performing and teaching coronary angioplasty. EuroIntervention. (2017) 13(1):15–27. doi: 10.4244/eijv13i1a2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Yock PG, Linker DT. Intravascular ultrasound. Looking below the surface of vascular disease. Circulation. (1990) 81(5):1715–8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.81.5.1715

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. (2024). doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Stone GW, Christiansen EH, Ali ZA, et al. Intravascular imaging-guided coronary drug-eluting stent implantation: an updated network meta-analysis. Lancet. (2024) 403(10429):824–37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02454-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Giacoppo D, Laudani C, Occhipinti G, et al. Coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography for guiding of percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Circulation. (2024) 149(14):1065–86. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067583

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Baumbach A, Bourantas CV, Serruys PW, Wijns W. The year in cardiology: coronary interventions. Eur Heart J. (2020) 41(3):394–405. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz947

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Jebari-Benslaiman S, Galicia-García U, Larrea-Sebal A, et al. Pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23(6). doi: 10.3390/ijms23063346

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Gussenhoven EJ, Essed CE, Lancee CT, et al. Arterial wall characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: an in vitro study. J Am Coll Cardiol. (1989) 14(4):947–52. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90471-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American college of cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS). A report of the American college of cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2001) 37(5):1478–92. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01175-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Granada JF, Wallace-Bradley D, Win HK, et al. In vivo plaque characterization using intravascular ultrasound-virtual histology in a porcine model of complex coronary lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2007) 27(2):387–93. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000253907.51681.0e

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Bruining N, Verheye S, Knaapen M, et al. Three-dimensional and quantitative analysis of atherosclerotic plaque composition by automated differential echogenicity. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. (2007) 70(7):968–78. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21310

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Pu J, Mintz GS, Biro S, et al. Insights into echo-attenuated plaques, echolucent plaques, and plaques with spotty calcification: novel findings from comparisons among intravascular ultrasound, near-infrared spectroscopy, and pathological histology in 2,294 human coronary artery segments. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2014) 63(21):2220–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.576

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Mehta SK, McCrary JR, Frutkin AD, Dolla WJ, Marso SP. Intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency analysis of coronary atherosclerosis: an emerging technology for the assessment of vulnerable plaque. Eur Heart J. (2007) 28(11):1283–8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm112

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Nair A, Kuban BD, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Nissen SE, Vince DG. Coronary plaque classification with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Circulation. (2002) 106(17):2200–6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000035654.18341.5E

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Nair A, Margolis MP, Kuban BD, Vince DG. Automated coronary plaque characterisation with intravascular ultrasound backscatter: ex vivo validation. EuroIntervention. (2007) 3(1):113–20.19737694

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

16. Garcia-Garcia HM, Mintz GS, Lerman A, et al. Tissue characterisation using intravascular radiofrequency data analysis: recommendations for acquisition, analysis, interpretation and reporting. EuroIntervention. (2009) 5(2):177–89. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i2a29

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Thim T, Hagensen MK, Wallace-Bradley D, et al. Unreliable assessment of necrotic core by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound in porcine coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. (2010) 3(4):384–91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.919357

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Brugaletta S, Cola C, Martin-Yuste V, et al. Qualitative and quantitative accuracy of ultrasound-based virtual histology for detection of necrotic core in human coronary arteries. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. (2014) 30(3):469–76. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0372-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Kawasaki M, Takatsu H, Noda T, et al. In vivo quantitative tissue characterization of human coronary arterial plaques by use of integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound and comparison with angioscopic findings. Circulation. (2002) 105(21):2487–92. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000017200.47342.10

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Kawasaki M, Bouma BE, Bressner J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography and integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound images for tissue characterization of human coronary plaques. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2006) 48(1):81–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.062

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Nakano M, Yahagi K, Yamamoto H, et al. Additive value of integrated backscatter IVUS for detection of vulnerable plaque by optical frequency domain imaging: an ex vivo autopsy study of human coronary arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2016) 9(2):163–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.07.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Ono M, Kawashima H, Hara H, et al. Advances in IVUS/OCT and future clinical perspective of novel hybrid catheter system in coronary imaging. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2020) 7:119. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00119

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Sathyanarayana S, Carlier S, Li W, Thomas L. Characterisation of atherosclerotic plaque by spectral similarity of radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound signals. EuroIntervention. (2009) 5(1):133–9. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i1a21

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Yamada R, Okura H, Kume T, et al. A comparison between 40 MHz intravascular ultrasound iMap imaging system and integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound. J Cardiol. (2013) 61(2):149–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.10.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Brezinski ME, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE, et al. Imaging of coronary artery microstructure (in vitro) with optical coherence tomography. Am J Cardiol. (1996) 77(1):92–3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89143-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Yabushita H, Bouma BE, Houser SL, et al. Characterization of human atherosclerosis by optical coherence tomography. Circulation. (2002) 106(13):1640–5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000029927.92825.f6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Jang IK, Tearney GJ, MacNeill B, et al. In vivo characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaque by use of optical coherence tomography. Circulation. (2005) 111(12):1551–5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000159354.43778.69

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Rieber J, Meissner O, Babaryka G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound for the detection and characterization of atherosclerotic plaque composition in ex-vivo coronary specimens: a comparison with histology. Coron Artery Dis. (2006) 17(5):425–30. doi: 10.1097/00019501-200608000-00005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Kume T, Akasaka T, Kawamoto T, et al. Assessment of coronary arterial plaque by optical coherence tomography. Am J Cardiol. (2006) 97(8):1172–5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.11.035

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Fujii K, Hao H, Shibuya M, et al. Accuracy of OCT, grayscale IVUS, and their combination for the diagnosis of coronary TCFA: an ex vivo validation study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2015) 8(4):451–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.10.015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Kume T, Akasaka T, Kawamoto T, et al. Assessment of coronary intima–media thickness by optical coherence tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circ J. (2005) 69(8):903–7. doi: 10.1253/circj.69.903

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang YH, Smialek J, Virmani R. Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly. N Engl J Med. (1997) 336(18):1276–82. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199705013361802

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability to rupture: angiogenesis as a source of intraplaque hemorrhage. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2005) 25(10):2054–61. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000178991.71605.18

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Bourantas CV, Garcia-Garcia HM, Diletti R, Muramatsu T, Serruys PW. Early detection and invasive passivation of future culprit lesions: a future potential or an unrealistic pursuit of chimeras? Am Heart J. (2013) 165(6):869–881.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.02.015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Abela GS, Aziz K, Vedre A, Pathak DR, Talbott JD, Dejong J. Effect of cholesterol crystals on plaques and intima in arteries of patients with acute coronary and cerebrovascular syndromes. Am J Cardiol. (2009) 103(7):959–68. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.12.019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Kume T, Akasaka T, Kawamoto T, et al. Measurement of the thickness of the fibrous cap by optical coherence tomography. Am Heart J. (2006) 152(4):755.e1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.06.030

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Kini AS, Vengrenyuk Y, Yoshimura T, et al. Fibrous cap thickness by optical coherence tomography in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2017) 69(6):644–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Radu MD, Yamaji K, Garcia-Garcia HM, et al. Variability in the measurement of minimum fibrous cap thickness and reproducibility of fibroatheroma classification by optical coherence tomography using manual versus semi-automatic assessment. EuroIntervention. (2016) 12(8):e987–97. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I8A162

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Tearney GJ, Yabushita H, Houser SL, et al. Quantification of macrophage content in atherosclerotic plaques by optical coherence tomography. Circulation. (2003) 107(1):113–9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000044384.41037.43

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Di Vito L, Agozzino M, Marco V, et al. Identification and quantification of macrophage presence in coronary atherosclerotic plaques by optical coherence tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. (2015) 16(7):807–13. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu307

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Phipps JE, Vela D, Hoyt T, et al. Macrophages and intravascular OCT bright spots: a quantitative study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2015) 8(1):63–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.07.027

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Prati F, Romagnoli E, Gatto L, et al. Relationship between coronary plaque morphology of the left anterior descending artery and 12 months clinical outcome: the CLIMA study. Eur Heart J. (2020) 41(3):383–91. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz520

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Katayama Y, Tanaka A, Taruya A, et al. Feasibility and clinical significance of in vivo cholesterol crystal detection using optical coherence tomography. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2020) 40(1):220–9. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312934

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Jinnouchi H, Sato Y, Torii S, et al. Detection of cholesterol crystals by optical coherence tomography. EuroIntervention. (2020) 16(5):395–403. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00202

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Kume T, Okura H, Yamada R, et al. Detection of plaque neovascularization by optical coherence tomography: ex vivo feasibility study and in vivo observation in patients with angina pectoris. J Invasive Cardiol. (2016) 28(1):17–22.26716590

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

46. Gruslova AB, Singh S, Hoyt T, et al. Accuracy of OCT core labs in identifying vulnerable plaque. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2024) 17(4):448–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2023.10.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Otsuka K, Villiger M, Nadkarni SK, Bouma BE. Intravascular polarimetry: clinical translation and future applications of catheter-based polarization sensitive optical frequency domain imaging. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2020) 7:146. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00146

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Cassis LA, Lodder RA. Near-IR imaging of atheromas in living arterial tissue. Anal Chem. (1993) 65(9):1247–56. doi: 10.1021/ac00057a023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Dempsey RJ, Davis DG, Buice RG, Lodder RA. Biological and medical applications of near-infrared spectrometry. Appl Spectrosc. (1996) 50(2):18A–34A. doi: 10.1366/0003702963906537

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Moreno PR, Lodder RA, Purushothaman KR, Charash WE, O'Connor WN, Muller JE. Detection of lipid pool, thin fibrous cap, and inflammatory cells in human aortic atherosclerotic plaques by near-infrared spectroscopy. Circulation. (2002) 105(8):923–7. doi: 10.1161/hc0802.104291

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Gardner CM, Tan H, Hull EL, et al. Detection of lipid core coronary plaques in autopsy specimens with a novel catheter-based near-infrared spectroscopy system. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2008) 1(5):638–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.06.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Schlett CL, Maurovich-Horvat P, Ferencik M, et al. Histogram analysis of lipid-core plaques in coronary computed tomographic angiography: ex vivo validation against histology. Invest Radiol. (2013) 48(9):646–53. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31828fdf9f

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Kang SJ, Mintz GS, Pu J, et al. Combined IVUS and NIRS detection of fibroatheromas: histopathological validation in human coronary arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2015) 8(2):184–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.09.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Puri R, Madder RD, Madden SP, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy enhances intravascular ultrasound assessment of vulnerable coronary plaque: a combined pathological and in vivo study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2015) 35(11):2423–31. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306118

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Bajaj R, Eggermont J, Grainger SJ, et al. Machine learning for atherosclerotic tissue component classification in combined near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound imaging: validation against histology. Atherosclerosis. (2022) 345:15–25. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2022.01.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Ali ZA, Dager A, Zuniga M, et al. First-in-human experience with a novel multimodality DeepOCT-NIRS intracoronary imaging system. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. (2024) 3(4):101344. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101344

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Verjans JW, Osborn EA, Ughi GJ, et al. Targeted near-infrared fluorescence imaging of atherosclerosis: clinical and intracoronary evaluation of indocyanine green. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2016) 9(9):1087–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.01.034

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Hara T, Ughi GJ, McCarthy JR, et al. Intravascular fibrin molecular imaging improves the detection of unhealed stents assessed by optical coherence tomography in vivo. Eur Heart J. (2017) 38(6):447–55. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv677

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Khraishah H, Jaffer FA. Intravascular molecular imaging: near-infrared fluorescence as a new frontier. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2020) 7:587100. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.587100

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Aikawa E, Nahrendorf M, Figueiredo JL, et al. Osteogenesis associates with inflammation in early-stage atherosclerosis evaluated by molecular imaging in vivo. Circulation. (2007) 116(24):2841–50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.732867

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Ughi GJ, Wang H, Gerbaud E, et al. Clinical characterization of coronary atherosclerosis with dual-modality OCT and near-infrared autofluorescence imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2016) 9(11):1304–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.11.020

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Albaghdadi MS, Ikegami R, Kassab MB, et al. Near-infrared autofluorescence in atherosclerosis associates with ceroid and is generated by oxidized lipid-induced oxidative stress. Arterioscler, Thromb, Vasc Biol. (2021) 41(7):e385–98. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.315612

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Kunio M, Gardecki JA, Watanabe K, et al. Histopathological correlation of near infrared autofluorescence in human cadaver coronary arteries. Atherosclerosis. (2022) 344:31–9. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2022.01.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Marcu L, Fang Q, Jo JA, et al. In vivo detection of macrophages in a rabbit atherosclerotic model by time-resolved laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy. Atherosclerosis. (2005) 181(2):295–303. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.02.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Kim S, Nam HS, Lee MW, et al. Comprehensive assessment of high-risk plaques by dual-modal imaging catheter in coronary artery. JACC Basic Transl Sci. (2021) 6(12):948–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2021.10.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Fatakdawala H, Gorpas D, Bishop JW, et al. Fluorescence lifetime imaging combined with conventional intravascular ultrasound for enhanced assessment of atherosclerotic plaques: an ex vivo study in human coronary arteries. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. (2015) 8(4):253–63. doi: 10.1007/s12265-015-9627-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Jo JA, Park J, Pande P, et al. Simultaneous morphological and biochemical endogenous optical imaging of atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. (2015) 16(8):910–8. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Bec J, Vela D, Phipps JE, et al. Label-free visualization and quantification of biochemical markers of atherosclerotic plaque progression using intravascular fluorescence lifetime. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2021) 14(9):1832–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.10.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Rico-Jimenez JJ, Serafino MJ, Shrestha S, et al. Automated detection of superficial macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques using autofluorescence lifetime imaging. Atherosclerosis. (2019) 285:120–7. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.04.223

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Bec J, Phipps JE, Gorpas D, et al. In vivo label-free structural and biochemical imaging of coronary arteries using an integrated ultrasound and multispectral fluorescence lifetime catheter system. Sci Rep. (2017) 7(1):8960. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08056-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Sethuraman S, Amirian JH, Litovsky SH, Smalling RW, Emelianov SY. Spectroscopic intravascular photoacoustic imaging to differentiate atherosclerotic plaques. Opt Express. (2008) 16(5):3362–7. doi: 10.1364/oe.16.003362

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Su JL, Wang B, Emelianov SY. Photoacoustic imaging of coronary artery stents. Opt Express. (2009) 17(22):19894–901. doi: 10.1364/OE.17.019894

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Zhang J, Yang S, Ji X, Zhou Q, Xing D. Characterization of lipid-rich aortic plaques by intravascular photoacoustic tomography: ex vivo and in vivo validation in a rabbit atherosclerosis model with histologic correlation. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2014) 64(4):385–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.053

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Bui NQ, Hlaing KK, Lee YW, Kang HW, Oh J. Ex vivo detection of macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques using intravascular ultrasonic-photoacoustic imaging. Phys Med Biol. (2017) 62(2):501–16. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa4f6b

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Wang B, Yantsen E, Larson T, et al. Plasmonic intravascular photoacoustic imaging for detection of macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques. Nano Lett. (2009) 9(6):2212–7. doi: 10.1021/nl801852e

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Jansen K, Wu M, van der Steen AF, van Soest G. Lipid detection in atherosclerotic human coronaries by spectroscopic intravascular photoacoustic imaging. Opt Express. (2013) 21(18):21472–84. doi: 10.1364/OE.21.021472

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Arabul MU, Heres M, Rutten MC, van Sambeek MR, van de Vosse FN, Lopata RG. Toward the detection of intraplaque hemorrhage in carotid artery lesions using photoacoustic imaging. J Biomed Opt. (2017) 22(4):41010. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.4.041010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Hui J, Cao Y, Zhang Y, et al. Real-time intravascular photoacoustic-ultrasound imaging of lipid-laden plaque in human coronary artery at 16 frames per second. Sci Rep. (2017) 7(1):1417. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01649-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Iskander-Rizk S, Wu M, Springeling G, et al. In vivo intravascular photoacoustic imaging of plaque lipid in coronary atherosclerosis. EuroIntervention. (2019) 15(5):452–6. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00318

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Bourantas CV, Jaffer FA, Gijsen FJ, et al. Hybrid intravascular imaging: recent advances, technical considerations, and current applications in the study of plaque pathophysiology. Eur Heart J. (2017) 38(6):400–12. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw097

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Bajaj R, Garcia-Garcia HM, Courtney BK, et al. Multi-modality intravascular imaging for guiding coronary intervention and assessing coronary atheroma: the Novasight hybrid IVUS-OCT system. Minerva Cardiol Angiol. (2021) 69(6):655–70. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5683.21.05532-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Li BH, Leung AS, Soong A, et al. Hybrid intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography catheter for imaging of coronary atherosclerosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. (2013) 81(3):494–507. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24295

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Ford JC, O'Rourke K, Veinot JP, Walley VM. Histologic estimation of coronary artery stenoses: reproducibility and the effect of training. Cardiovasc Pathol. (2000) 9(5):251–5. doi: 10.1016/S1054-8807(00)00044-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Palmer ND, Northridge D, Lessells A, McDicken WN, Fox KA. In vitro analysis of coronary atheromatous lesions by intravascular ultrasound; reproducibility and histological correlation of lesion morphology. Eur Heart J. (1999) 20(23):1701–6. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1627

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Baruah V, Zahedivash A, Hoyt T, et al. Automated coronary plaque characterization with intravascular optical coherence tomography and smart-algorithm approach: virtual histology OCT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2020) 13(8):1848–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.02.022

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Shibutani H, Fujii K, Ueda D, et al. Automated classification of coronary atherosclerotic plaque in optical frequency domain imaging based on deep learning. Atherosclerosis. (2021) 328:100–5. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.06.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Bajaj R, Parasa R, Broersen A, et al. Examination of the performance of machine learning-based automated coronary plaque characterization by NIRS-IVUS and OCT with histology. Eur Heart J Dig Health. (2025). In press.

Google Scholar

88. Ramasamy A, Parasa R, Sokooti H, et al. Computed tomography versus near-infrared spectroscopy for the assessment of coronary atherosclerosis. EuroIntervention. (2024) 20(23):e1465–75. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00096

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Ramasamy A, Pugliese F, Tanboga IH, et al. Head-to-head comparison of near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound and coronary computed tomography angiography in assessing atheroma characteristics. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2024) 17(12):1507–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.07.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Ramasamy A, Sokooti H, Zhang X, et al. Novel near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound-based deep-learning methodology for accurate coronary computed tomography plaque quantification and characterization. Eur Heart J Open. (2023) 3(5):oead090. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oead090

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Narula J, Stuckey TD, Nakazawa G, et al. Prospective deep learning-based quantitative assessment of coronary plaque by computed tomography angiography compared with intravascular ultrasound: the REVEALPLAQUE study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. (2024) 25(9):1287–95. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae115

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Manfrini O, Mont E, Leone O, et al. Sources of error and interpretation of plaque morphology by optical coherence tomography. Am J Cardiol. (2006) 98(2):156–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.097

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Shimokado A, Matsuo Y, Kubo T, et al. In vivo optical coherence tomography imaging and histopathology of healed coronary plaques. Atherosclerosis. (2018) 275:35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.05.025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Kume T, Akasaka T, Kawamoto T, et al. Assessment of coronary arterial thrombus by optical coherence tomography. Am J Cardiol. (2006) 97(12):1713–7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.031

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Eriksen E, Herstad J, Pertiwi KR, et al. Thrombus characteristics evaluated by acute optical coherence tomography in ST elevation myocardial infarction. PLoS One. (2022) 17(4):e0266634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266634

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Goderie TPM, van Soest G, Garcia-Garcia HM, et al. Combined optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound radio frequency data analysis for plaque characterization. Classification accuracy of human coronary plaques in vitro. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. (2010) 26(8):843–50. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9631-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Brown AJ, Obaid DR, Costopoulos C, et al. Direct comparison of virtual-histology intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography imaging for identification of thin-cap fibroatheroma. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. (2015) 8(10):e003487. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.003487

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Inaba S, Mintz GS, Burke AP, et al. Intravascular ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopic characterization of thin-cap fibroatheroma. Am J Cardiol. (2017) 119(3):372–8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.10.031

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar