Riccardo Accioli1
Viola Salvini1
Junjie Xiao2
Pietro Enea Lazzerini1
Leonardo Roever3,4
Maurizio Acampa1*
- 1Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
- 2Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Organ Repair, School of Life Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
- 3Department of Clinical Research, Brazilian Evidence-Based Health Network, Uberlândia, Brazil
- 4Gilbert and Rose -Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon
Editorial on the Research Topic Year in review: discussions in general cardiovascular medicine
This Research Topic sought to ignite meaningful discussions and enhance our understanding of the advancements and perspectives presented in selected articles from the field of Cardiovascular Medicine in 2022. These articles garnered notable attention throughout the year especially addressing various topics, including coronary artery disease (CAD), cardiac hypertrophy and abdominal aortic disease (AAA).
The mortality rate associated with CAD has declined over recent decades; however, it remains a leading cause of death worldwide, imposing a significant economic burden (1). One of the most important aspects in this setting is represented by refractory angina pectoris, a clinical condition characterized by persistent symptoms lasting beyond 3 months, even with the escalation of pharmacotherapy, including second- and third-line pharmacological agents, as well as bypass grafting, stenting, or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total coronary occlusion (2, 3). Since the number of subjects with CAD who develop refractory angina pectoris despite optimal medical treatment including exercised based cardiac rehabilitation is growing (4–6), it is of great scientific interest to discover new therapeutic strategies in this field. To better comprehend these aspects, Chen et al. conducted a 20-year (2003–2022) bibliometric analysis, highlighting the potential role of novel treatment methods, including spinal cord stimulation, enhanced external counterpulsation, stem cell therapy, and the coronary sinus reducer. However, despite these advancements, the absence of high-quality randomized controlled trials, long-term evidence of benefits, and cost-effectiveness studies limits their use in refractory angina pectoris. For these reasons, the authors emphasize the need for further research to better understand their potential impact on refractory angina outcome, and, more generally, on CAD outcome.
In this regard, it is worth highlighting how a significative portion of cases of CAD, up to 15%, is due to nonobstructive coronary artery myocardial infarction (MINOCA), defined as myocardial infarction in presence of coronary artery stenosis <50% at angiography (7, 8). The absence of significant coronary stenosis highlights the role of non-atherosclerotic thrombogenic mechanisms, in which the use of antiplatelet therapy may not be efficacious, given the unclear relationship between certain etiologies and platelet function that could negatively impact the final outcome (9). On this important topic, Chen et al. provide an important viewpoint regarding principal aspects of this phenomenon, including a discussion of the types of MINOCA antiplatelet drugs, possible etiologies, and interesting clinical perspectives about MINOCA guidelines and clinical studies. In particular, the authors show the lack of convincing evidence to demonstrate the beneficial effect of dual antiplatelet therapy in the presence of small plaque rupture in non-significant stenosis and non-thrombotic coverage. The absence of a clear indication for antiplatelets on one side suggests the importance of conducting appropriate study populations and prospective randomized controlled trials to better evaluate the impact of antiplatelets agents; on the other hand, it strengthens the use of statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor antagonist, now the only drugs able to reduce mortality in MINOCA patients. Lastly, the authors emphasize the importance of comprehending the underlying cause. This last point is crucial in antiplatelet responsiveness, especially when platelets are not involved in the phenomenon genesis (10). An important contribution to this non-thrombotic state is given to the discrepancy between oxygen demand/offer, for example during cardiac hypertrophy. In this scenario, the role of systemic inflammation in cardiovascular diseases is increasingly well-known. Cardiac hypertrophy, characterized by an increase in cardiomyocyte size (11), is a physiological adaptive response to various stimuli, such as exercise and pregnancy (12). Nevertheless, it can also be caused by pathological factors, such as increased interstitial fibrosis, cell death, cardiac dysfunction and the release of proinflammatory cytokines (13, 14). An important view about this phenomenon is reported by Zhang et al. In their review, the authors describe the role of toll-like receptors (TLRs), innate immune response receptors, as a key factor in cardiovascular diseases. TLRs are a family of pattern recognition receptors that can identify pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). TLRs interact with their ligands and co-receptors to induce the expression of numerous inflammatory factors and inflammatory cell infiltration into the heart, leading to cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure through various inflammatory pathways (Zhang et al.). The TLRs more closely related to cardiac hypertrophy are TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, TLR5, TLR7/8 and TLR9. Currently, there is little evidence in the literature on the role of TLR7/8 and TLR9 in cardiac hypertrophy, in particular on how they mediate inflammatory pathways and heart disease. Importantly, excessive activation of TLRs can lead to chronic inflammation and autoimmune diseases (15, 16). Future perspectives could develop drugs and methods to balance TLRs signaling, considering molecular target therapy against TLRs. Some of the TLR-based agonist and antagonist agents have been shown to be effective in preclinical models and are now entering clinical trials (17, 18). Overall, the goal is to understand the mechanism of the TLRs-mediated inflammatory response in cardiac hypertrophy and to identify potential therapeutic targets through TLRs' downstream and upstream signaling pathways.
Lastly, inflammation could involve not only the heart but also the vessels. In this regard, an important condition that influences the outcome of general population is represented by aortic disease. Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an inflammatory vascular disease with associated high disability and mortality. Risk factors for the development of this disease are old age, high blood pressure, male sex, aortic atherosclerosis and smoking (19–22). Thanks to the improvement of screening techniques, the incidence of AAA increases annually. The progression and pathophysiology of AAA are characterized by inflammatory destruction. As seen in the review by Ling et al. the gut microbiota, an “invisible organ”, can contribute to the formation and progression of AAA by directly or indirectly promoting the inflammation of the vascular wall via release of intestinal metabolites, in turn activating TLRs and cell-mediated immunity (23), responsible for intensified arterial wall remodelling (24). The imbalance between pathological and symbiotic bacteria in the gut can lead to changes in immune development and inappropriate inflammatory responses, but it is not yet known whether this imbalance is the cause or result of AAA (Ling et al.). Gut probiotics, antibiotics, immune modulators, nitric oxide, cholesterol-lowering drugs, gut microbiota transplantation, through the modulation of the vascular inflammatory response, could represent new therapeutic perspectives for AAA (25–29).
In conclusion, this Research Topic has not only facilitated insightful discussions but has also enriched our comprehension of pivotal developments and perspectives in Cardiovascular Medicine during 2022. While highlighting emerging therapeutic strategies, these articles emphasize the imperative for further research, to provide continued advancements in understanding, diagnosis, and treatment strategies, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes.
Author contributions
RA: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. VS: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JX: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. PL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LR: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MA: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Duggan JP, Peters AS, Trachiotis GD, Antevil JL. Epidemiology of coronary artery disease. Surg Clin North Am. (2022) 102(3):499–516. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2022.01.007
2. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the task force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European society of cardiology. Eur Heart J. (2013) 34(38):2949–3003. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht296
3. Mannheimer C, Camici P, Chester MR, Collins A, DeJongste M, Eliasson T, et al. The problem of chronic refractory angina; report from the ESC joint study group on the treatment of refractory angina. Eur Heart J. (2002) 23(5):355–70. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2706
4. Vervaat FE, van der Gaag A, Teeuwen K, van Suijlekom H, Wijnbergen I. Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review. Eur Heart J Open. (2023) 3(1):oeac083. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeac083
5. Chen H, Chen C, Spanos M, Li G, Lu R, Bei Y, et al. Exercise training maintains cardiovascular health: signaling pathways involved and potential therapeutics. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2022) 7(1):306. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01153-1
6. Xiao J, Rosenzweig AJ. Exercise and cardiovascular protection: update and future. Sport Health Sci. (2021) 10(6):607–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2021.11.001
7. Abdu FA, Mohammed AQ, Liu L, Xu Y, Che W. Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a review of the current position. Cardiology. (2020) 145(9):543–52. doi: 10.1159/000509100
8. Trisha S, Andrew RC, Marc RD, Nicholas LM, David EN. MINOCA: a heterogenous group of conditions associated with myocardial damage. Heart. (2021) 107(18):1458. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318269
9. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, Collet HP, Costa F, Jeppsson A, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the task force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European society of cardiology (ESC) and of the European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. (2018) 39(3):213–60. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419
10. Lindahl B, Baron T, Albertucci M, Prati F. Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention. (2021) 17(11):e875–87. doi: 10.4244/eij-d-21-00426
11. Oldfield CJ, Duhamel TA, Dhalla NS. Mechanisms for the transition from physiological to pathological cardiac hypertrophy. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. (2020) 98(2):74–84. doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2019-0566
12. Wang L, Wang J, Li G, Xiao J. Non-coding RNAs in physiological cardiac hypertrophy. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2020) 1229:149–61. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-1671-9_8
13. Samak M, Fatullayev J, Sabashnikov A, Zeriouh M, Schmack B, Faraget M, et al. Cardiac hypertrophy: an Introduction to molecular and cellular basis. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. (2016) 22:75–9. doi: 10.12659/msmbr.900437
14. Bernardo BC, Weeks KL, Pretorius L, McMullen JR. Molecular distinction between physiological and pathological cardiac hypertrophy: experimental findings and therapeutic strategies. Pharmacol Ther. (2010) 128(1):191–227. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.04.005
15. Soraci L, Gambuzza ME, Biscetti L, et al. Toll-like receptors and NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent pathways in Parkinson’s disease: mechanisms and therapeutic implications. J Neurol. (2023) 270(3):1346–60. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11491-3
16. Bezhaeva T, Karper J, Quax PHA, de Vries MR. The intriguing role of TLR accessory molecules in cardiovascular health and disease. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2022) 9:820962. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.820962
17. Anwar MA, Shah M, Kim J, Choi S. Recent clinical trends in toll-like receptor targeting therapeutics. Med Res Rev. (2019) 39(3):1053–90. doi: 10.1002/med.21553
18. Farooq M, Batool M, Kim MS, Choi S. Toll-Like receptors as a therapeutic target in the era of immunotherapies. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2021) 9:756315. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.756315
19. Yao L, Folsom AR, Alonso A, Lutsey PL, Pankow JS, Guan W, et al. Association of carotid atherosclerosis and stiffness with abdominal aortic aneurysm: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Atherosclerosis. (2018) 270:110–6. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.01.044
20. Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Alonso A, Beaton AZ, Bittencourt MS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2022 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. (2022) 145(8):e153–639. doi: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001052
21. Tang W, Yao L, Roetker NS, Alonso A, Lutsey PL, Steenson CC, et al. Lifetime risk and risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a 24-year prospective study: the ARIC study (atherosclerosis risk in communities). Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2016) 36(12):2468–77. doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.116.308147
22. Cooper HA, Cicalese S, Preston KJ, Kawai T, Okuno K, Choi ET, et al. Targeting mitochondrial fission as a potential therapeutic for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cardiovasc Res. (2021) 117(3):971–82. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa133
23. Xia N, Lu Y, Gu M, Li N, Liu M, Jiao J, et al. A unique population of regulatory T cells in heart potentiates cardiac protection from myocardial infarction. Circulation. (2020) 142(20):1956–73. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046789
24. Jabłońska A, Neumayer C, Bolliger M, Gollackner B, Klinger M, Paradowska E, et al. Analysis of host toll-like receptor 3 and RIG-I-like receptor gene expression in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. (2018) 68(6s):39s–46s. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.087
25. Yadav MK, Kumari I, Singh B, Sharma KK, Tiwari SK. Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics: safe options for next-generation therapeutics. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. (2022) 106(2):505–21. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11646-8
26. Shikata F, Shimada K, Sato H, Ikedo T, Kuwabara A, Furukawa H, et al. Potential influences of gut microbiota on the formation of intracranial aneurysm. Hypertension. (2019) 73(2):491–6. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.118.11804
27. Umebayashi R, Uchida HA, Kakio Y, Subramanian V, Daugherty A, Wada J. Cilostazol attenuates angiotensin II-induced abdominal aortic aneurysms but not atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2018) 38(4):903–12. doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.117.309707
28. Poorsattar Bejeh-Mir A, Parsian H, Akbari Khoram M, Ghasemi N, Bijani A, Khosravi-Samani M. Diagnostic role of salivary and GCF nitrite, nitrate and nitric oxide to distinguish healthy periodontium from gingivitis and periodontitis. Int J Mol Cell Med. (2014) 3(3):138–45.25317400
Keywords: coronary artery disease, cardiac hypertrophy, abdominal aortic disease, inflammation, cardiovascular medicine
Citation: Accioli R, Salvini V, Xiao J, Lazzerini PE, Roever L and Acampa M (2023) Editorial: Year in review: discussions in general cardiovascular medicine. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 10:1341650. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1341650
Received: 20 November 2023; Accepted: 23 November 2023;
Published: 5 December 2023.
Edited and Reviewed by: Coen van Solingen, New York University, United States
Reviewed by:
Xiu Liu, Southern Medical University, China© 2023 Accioli, Salvini, Xiao, Lazzerini, Roever and Acampa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Maurizio Acampa bS5hY2FtcGFAYW8tc2llbmEudG9zY2FuYS5pdA==