Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med., 13 November 2023
Sec. Coronary Artery Disease

Hemoglobin albumin lymphocyte and platelet score and all-cause mortality in coronary heart disease: a retrospective cohort study of NHANES database

\r\nYang ZhengYang ZhengYubing HuangYubing HuangHaitao Li
\r\nHaitao Li*
  • Department of Cardiology, Hainan Province Clinical Medical Center, Hainan General Hospital, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China

Aim: Anemia, inflammatory status, and malnutrition are all important factors in the prognosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and their interactions are also noteworthy. A recent scoring system, the hemoglobin albumin lymphocyte and platelet (HALP) score, combining multi-dimensional metrics, has been used in the prognoses of many diseases except coronary heart disease (CHD). Herein, this study aims to explore the association between HALP score and all-cause mortality in patients with CHD.

Methods: Demographic and clinical data of adult patients with CHD were extracted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) database from 2003 to 2018 in this retrospective cohort study. Weighted univariate and multivariate COX proportional hazard models were used for covariates screening and exploration of the association between HALP score and all-cause mortality. The evaluation indexes were hazard ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve and the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve were used to assess the predictive performance of HALP on CHD prognosis. In addition, subgroup analyses of age and congestive heart failure (CHF) were also performed.

Results: Among the eligible patients, 657 died of all-cause mortality. After adjusting for the covariates including age, education level, PIR, marital status, smoking, physical activity, total energy intake, CHF, stroke, hypertension, DM, CKD, cancer or malignancy, monocyte, drug for CVD, treatment for anemia, anticoagulants drug, and adrenal cortical steroids, we found that HALP score was negatively associated with the risk of all-cause mortality [HR = 0.83, 95% CI: (0.74–0.93)]. Compared with patients with high HALP scores, those who had lower HALP scores seemed to have a higher risk of all-cause mortality (all P < 0.05). HALP score has a potential predictive value on CHD prognosis with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.61. Furthermore, in patients aged <65 years, with or without CHF, a lower HALP score was also associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions: HALP score has a potential predictive value on CHD prognosis; however, the causal association between HALP score and mortality in patients with CHD needs further exploration.

Introduction

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the most common cardiovascular disease (CVD), accounting for the plurality of worldwide morbidity and mortality (1, 2). CHD causes both healthcare and financial burdens; therefore, finding convenient indicators to predict the risk of mortality in CHD is essential for its prognostic management (3).

Anemia is an important influencing factor in the prognosis of CVD (46). A previous study on patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) showed that low hemoglobin (HB) was an independent predictor of cardiovascular events and mortality (7). Albumin (ALB), an indicator of the nutritional status of the human body, has been widely used in prognostic studies of CVDs (8). Wada et al. (9) found that pre-procedural serum ALB concentration for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) may be a predictor for major adverse cardiac events in patients with CAD. In addition, the inflammatory status of the organism is also an important influencing factor in CVD prognosis. Besides the manifestation of acute inflammation, decreased lymphocytes are strongly associated with CVD prognosis (10), while platelets play an important role in the acute and chronic inflammatory process of CAD (11). Kabat et al. (12) reveal that higher or lower levels of platelets are both linked to an increased risk of mortality from CHD in postmenopausal women.

It is noteworthy that the interaction among anemia, malnutrition, and inflammation may have an impact on disease prognoses (13). Inflammation reduces ALB synthesis, leading to a decrease in serum ALB concentration (14), and high production of cytokines limits iron uptake and inhibits erythrocyte maturation, which can further lead to anemia (15). Also, malnutrition is associated with anemia in patients with CVD (16). Therefore, a scoring system that combines multi-dimensional metrics may be more appropriate for prognostic assessment of patients with CHD. In recent years, a combination of the above indicators with the hemoglobin albumin lymphocyte and platelet score (HALP), has been used in the prognoses of multiple tumors, heart failures (HR), and stroke (1720). However, no studies have analyzed the association between HALP scores and the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with CHD.

Herein, this study aims to explore the relationship between the HALP score and the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with CHD and assess the predictive performance of the HALP score in order to provide some references for the exploration of a convenient tool to identify high-risk populations with poor CHD prognoses.

Methods

Study design and participants

Data on patients with CHD were extracted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) database from 2003 to 2018 in this retrospective cohort study. NHANES is conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). It uses a complex, multistage stratified probability sample based on selected counties, blocks, households, and persons within households to assess the nutritional and health status of the non-institutionalized population in the United States. Interviews in participants’ homes were conducted by the NCHS-trained professionals, and extensive physical examinations including blood and urine collection were conducted at mobile exam centers (MECs). Details of the study implementation are available online: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm. In addition, the raw data extracted from the database are shown in the Supplementary Material.

A total of 1,908 adult patients with CHD were initially included. The exclusion criteria were missing information on (1) HALP score, (2) survival, (3) HB, (4) ALB, (5) lymphocytes, and (6) platelets. Finally, 1,633 of them were eligible. The NHANES survey was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of NCHS. Written informed consent for participation has been obtained before every survey in NHANES. Since the data were deidentified and publicly available, no ethical approval of our IRB was required.

Diagnosis of coronary heart disease

Diagnosis of CHD was according to the question in the NHANES multiple-choice questionnaire (MCQ160C): “Has a doctor or other health professional ever told you that you had CHD?” The participants who had positive answers were classified as patients with CHD.

Definition of the hemoglobin albumin lymphocyte and platelet score

In NHANES, a blood sample was obtained through examinations at the MECs, and HALP score-related indexes including serum HB, ALB, lymphocyte, and platelet levels were further analyzed in the laboratory. The HALP score was calculated according to the formula: HB (g/l) × ALB (g/l) × lymphocytes (109/l)/platelets (109/l) due to the fact that the unit of ALB in the database was “g/dl”. We divided the HALP score into four levels according to the quartiles (<37.31, 37.31–51.15, 51.15–69.68, and >69.68) on the basis of previous studies (18, 21).

Variables collection

We collected potential confounding factors including age, gender, race, education level, marital status, poverty income ratio (PIR), drinking, smoking, physical activity, total energy intake, congestive heart failure (CHF), stroke, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney diseases (CKD), liver disease, CVD family history, cancer or malignancy, body mass index (BMI), white blood cell (WBC), monocyte, drug for CVD use, treatment for anemia, anticoagulants drug use, antiplatelet agents use, anticonvulsants use, and adrenal cortical steroids use.

The smoking status was self-reported during the NHANES household interview. Participants who claimed to have smoked fewer than 100 cigarettes in their lives were labeled ‘never smokers’. Smokers were individuals who had smoked more than 100 cigarettes in their lives (22). Drinking status was self-reported based on the question: “Had at least 12 alcohol drinks/1 year?”. Physical activity was defined by the question: “Performing high-intensity or moderate-intensity physical activity” and answered “yes” (23). Hypertension was defined by laboratory inspection, self-reported hypertension, current use of hypotensive drugs, a measured systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥130 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mm Hg, diagnosed with hypertension, or taking antihypertensive medication. Participants with total cholesterol (TC) ≥200 mg/dl (5.2 mmol/L), triglycerides (TG) ≥150 mg/dl (1.7 mmol/L), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥130 mg/dl (3.4 mmol/L), HDL-C ≤40 mg/dl (1.0 mmol/L), self-reported hypercholesteremia, or receiving lipid-lowering therapy were identified as dyslipidemia. The diagnosis of DM was fasting blood glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L, glycosylated HB (HbAlc) ≥6.5%, self-reported DM, or receiving hypoglycemic therapy (24). The eGFR was calculated as follows: estimated GFR = 175 × standardized Scr −1.154 × age−0.203 × 1.212 (if Black) × 0.742 (if female), where GFR is expressed as ml/min/1.73 m2 of body surface area 41 and Scr is expressed in mg/dl. The total energy intake was calculated according to the first 24-hour dietary recall in the NHANES.

Outcome and follow-up

The study outcome was all-cause mortality, which was identified using the international classification of diseases, ninth revisions (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes. In NHANES, the information on death was obtained through the link of the National Death Index (NDI): https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-linkage/mortality.htm. The follow-up ended after participants died or up to 31 December 2019.

Statistical analysis

Measurement data were described using mean ± standard error (mean ± SE) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for comparison. Enumeration data were expressed as numbers with constituent ratio [N (%)] and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for the comparison.

We used a set of NHANES special weights: the 2-year cycle of MEC exam weight (wtmec2yr) for statistical analyses because the HALP score was calculated using four laboratory indexes. Weighted univariate COX proportional hazard model analyses were used to screen the covariates. The association between the HALP score and the risk of all-cause mortality was explored using univariate and multivariate COX proportional hazard model analyses. The model was adjusted for age, education level, PIR, marital status, smoking, physical activity, total energy intake, CHF, stroke, hypertension, DM, CKD, cancer or malignancy, monocyte, drug for CVD, treatment for anemia, anticoagulants drug, and adrenal cortical steroids. We also drew a Kaplan–Meier (KM) curve to assess the survival probability of patients at different HALP levels. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to reflect the predictive performance of HALP on one-year all-cause mortality in patients with CHD and compared with HB, ALB, lymphocyte, and platelet. In addition, subgroup analyses were performed to explore this relationship in patients with different ages and CHF statuses.

The evaluation indexes were hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Two-sided P < 0.05 was considered significant. The missing data are shown in Supplementary Table S1, and we employed multiple imputations to handle missing data and minimize bias. Sensitivity analysis of the association between HALP levels and all-cause mortality in CHD patients before and after the imputations of missing data are shown in Supplementary Table S2. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and R version 4.2.2 (Institute for Statistics and Mathematics, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Characteristics of the study population

Figure 1 shows the flowchart of the participants screening. We initially included 1,908 adult patients with CHD from the database. Those who had missing information on HALP (n = 228), survival (n = 1), HB (n = 11), ALB (n = 11), lymphocyte (n = 8), and platelet (n = 16) were excluded. Finally, 1,633 of them were eligible.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Flowchart of participants screening.

After an average of 81 months of follow-up, 657 (33.90%) of the patients died. Their characteristics are shown in Table 1. Most of the patients were ≥65 years old (63.71%) and were men (66.05%). The average HALP score was 56.32 among participants. We compared patients with CHD who had different HALP levels and found that age, gender, smoking, dyslipidemia, CKD, HB, ALB, lymphocyte, platelet, WBC, monocyte, treatment for anemia, anticonvulsants, and adrenal cortical steroids were all significantly different among the four HALP score groups (all P < 0.05). Based on these findings, we further plotted the KM curves of the survival probability of patients with CHD at different HALP score levels (Figure 2), which showed that lower HALP scores may be associated with a lower survival probability in patients with CHD.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Characteristics of CHD patients.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Km curves of the survival probability at different HALP score levels.

Association between HALP scores and all-cause mortality

Supplementary Table S3 shows the covariates related to all-cause mortality, including age, education level, PIR, marital status, smoking, physical activity, total energy intake, CHF, stroke, hypertension, DM, CKD, cancer or malignancy, monocyte, drug for CVD, treatment for anemia, anticoagulants drug, and adrenal cortical steroids (all P < 0.05).

Then, we explored the relationship between HALP score and all-cause mortality in patients with CHD (Table 2). After adjusting for the covariates, we found that the HALP score was negatively associated with the risk of all-cause mortality [HR = 0.83, 95% CI: (0.74–0.93)]. Compared with patients whose HALP scores were >69.68, those who had HALP scores ≤69.68 seemed to have a high risk of all-cause mortality [HALP score of 51.15–69.68: HR = 1.36, 95% CI: (1.01–1.84); HALP score of 37.31–51.15: HR = 1.41, 95% CI: (1.07–1.85); and HALP score <37.31: HR = 1.64, 95% CI: (1.24–2.17)].

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Association between HALP scores and all-cause mortality.

Since the HALP score was calculated by HB, ALB, lymphocyte, and platelet, we compared the predictive performance of HALP and the above four serum indexes on all-cause mortality (Figure 3). The ROCs showed that the HALP score has an AUC of 0.610 and that of HB, ALB, lymphocyte, and platelet were 0.560, 0.564, 0.595, and 0.515, respectively. The predictive values of these indexes are shown in Table 3. HALP score had a sensitivity of 0.510 and specificity of 0.654 on CHD prognosis, indicating a potential predictive value.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. The predictive performance of HALP, HB, ALB, lymphocyte, and platelet on one-year all-cause mortality.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Predictive values of HALP scores on all-cause mortality.

Relationship between HALP score and all-cause mortality in age and CHF subgroups

We further explored this association in age and CHF subgroups (Table 4). In patients who are <65 years old, we have not found an association between the HALP score and the risk of all-cause mortality (all P > 0.05). Nevertheless, those who were ≥65 years old with a HALP score of <37.31 may have an increased risk of all-cause mortality [HR = 1.86, 95% CI: (1.38–2.51)]. Furthermore, patients with [HR = 2.00, 95% CI: (1.29–3.10)] or without [HR = 1.48, 95% CI: (1.01–2.17)] CHF having HALP scores less than 37.31 both had an increased risk of all-cause mortality.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Association between HALP scores and all-cause mortality in age and CHF subgroups.

Discussion

In this study, we explored the relationship between HALP scores and all-cause mortality in patients with CHD. The results showed that HALP scores were negatively associated with all-cause mortality. Patients with CHD who had lower HALP scores seemed to have a higher risk of all-cause mortality. We also assessed the performance of the HALP score on CHD prognosis, which indicated that the HALP score had a potential predictive value. In addition, the association between a HALP score of <37.31 and a high risk of all-cause mortality was also found in patients who were ≥65 years old or with/without CHF.

HALP score has been recently defined as a combination score system that can predict the patient's prognosis much better than a single index. HALP score assesses both the immune system and the nutritional status of the patients and has been applied in the prediction of various diseases’ prognoses such as cancers (17, 19, 20, 25). However, studies on the predictive value of HALP score in CHD prognosis have been scarce. Tian et al. (18) suggested that an increased HALP score was related to a decreased risk of mortality within 90 days and 1 year in consecutive acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. Li et al. (26) found that the HALP score may be a potential protective marker in acute and subacute cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) patients, and the HALP model had a potentially prognostic value. In the current study, we similarly found that HALP score was negatively associated with all-cause mortality in patients with CHD, and there may be a potential value of HALP score on CHD prognosis. CHD has been characterized as a chronic immunoinflammatory disease fueled by lipids and potentially modifiable risk factors such as systemic inflammation, DM, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), plasma triglycerides (TG), remnant lipoproteins (RLP), and vascular endothelial dysfunction (ED) (2). A retrospective study on plasma proteins and CVD mortality in patients with chronic CHD showed that myocardial strain–dysfunction–hypertrophy–fibrosis, myocyte death and apoptosis, kidney injury, hemodynamic stress, renin–angiotensin system (RAS) activation, oxidative stress and inflammation, and angiogenesis and vascular cell proliferation (HGF) are important mechanisms associated with CVD mortality (27). Additionally, nutrition also plays a primary role in cardiovascular function. In patients with ischemic coronary disease and heart failure, high or low BMI were both associated with cardiac metabolism and function (28). Based on previous evidence, we indicated that the HALP score can comprehensively assess inflammation levels, and the nutritional status of the organism may be a convenient and detailed predictor for CHD prognosis. However, the current study could not find any large predictive advantage of the HALP score over the single indicators, and future prospective cohort studies are needed to confirm its potential predictive value.

According to the formula for HALP score calculation, the serum HB, ALB, and lymphocyte concentration increased along with the HALP score rising, while that of platelet decreased. We found a potential value of HALP score on CHD prognosis with a little bit higher AUC than the other four single indexes. The low HB often coexisted with inflammation. In a large stable CAD population, low HB was an independent predictor of mortality, cardiovascular events, and major bleeds (7). Inflammation can trigger the process of thrombosis and platelets participate in the adhesion, release reaction, and aggregation of it (29). Lymphocytes play an important role in the elimination and repair of inflammation, and lymphocyte counts have been reported to be an independent significant risk factor to have predictive value for CHD and 1-year major adverse cardiac events (30). ALB has a protective effect due to its antagonism of oxidation, thrombosis, and leukocyte adhesion (31, 32). Low serum ALB was also independently related to CHD (33). HALP score is a cost-effective, simple parameter that can easily assess the inflammation–nutritional status. The finding of the HALP score's predictive value was significant because the instant inflammation–nutritional status assessment may help clinicians assess prognosis and formulate appropriate treatment plans in patients with CHD.

We also explored the association between HALP score and all-cause mortality in patients with different ages and CHF statuses. In NHANES, most of the CHD patients were ≥65 years old (63.71%), and among them, those who had lower HALP scores seemed to have higher hazards of all-cause mortality. Aging is associated with CHD, and the potential mechanisms might be metabolism disorders and DNA methylation (34). Si et al. (35) identified that DNA methylation age was associated with the incidence of CHD. Gutierrez-Mariscal et al. (36) suggested that patients with CHD who were ≥60 years old were less metabolic flexible and showed the same risk of suffering from carotid atherosclerosis as those who with metabolic disease. Moreover, we also found that patients with or without CHF had HALP scores that were both associated with all-cause mortality. Kocaoglu S et al. (37) compared the efficiency of the HALP score and the modified HALP score in predicting mortality in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) but found that the classical HALP score was not adequate for predicting early and late prognosis of AHF patients. The most common comorbidities of AHF were arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, and CAD (38). However, the mechanisms of the relationship between HALP scores and all-cause mortality in CHD patients of different ages and CHF statuses have not been clear and need further exploration. The results of the current study suggested that clinicians should focus on the HALP scores of CHD patients who are ≥65 years old and with/without CHF for further adjustment of their treatment strategies and enhance real-time testing to reduce the risk of mortality.

This was a retrospective cohort study that may provide some references for the exploration of causal associations between HALP scores and CHD prognosis. Our study extracted data from the NHANES database with a well-represented population selected through a multistage complex sampling. In addition, the four indicators that make up the HALP score are all easy to measure and have good clinical application value. However, there are some limitations in the current study. Because of the retrospective characteristic nature of this study, the inherent selection bias of this design type cannot be avoided. There was a limited number of study sample size; however, sufficient follow-up time has ensured the number of outcome cases. Further validation and refinement are needed to overcome these limitations and enhance the practicality and reliability of the HALP score in CHD prognosis.

Conclusion

This study provided some references for the potential value of the HALP score for CHD prognosis but further exploration of the practicality and reliability of the HALP score is still needed.

Data availability statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: NHANES database, https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/.

Author contributions

YZ and HL designed the study. YZ wrote the manuscript. YH collected, analyzed, and interpreted the data. HL critically reviewed, edited, and approved the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1241217/full#supplementary-material

References

1. World Health Organization. Global health estimates: leading causes of death. (2021) Available at: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality (Accessed April 13, 2022).

2. Shaya GE, Leucker TM, Jones SR, Martin SS, Toth PP. Coronary heart disease risk: low-density lipoprotein and beyond. Trends Cardiovasc Med. (2022) 32(4):181–94. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2021.04.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. McCullough PA. Coronary artery disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2007) 2(3):611–6. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03871106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Beladan CC, Botezatu SB. Anemia and management of heart failure patients. Heart Fail Clin. (2021) 17(2):195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2020.12.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Goel H, Hirsch JR, Deswal A, Hassan SA. Anemia in cardiovascular disease: marker of disease severity or disease-modifying therapeutic target? Curr Atheroscler Rep. (2021) 23(10):61. doi: 10.1007/s11883-021-00960-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Zhang Z, Jiang C, He L, Bai Y, Wu J, Hu R, et al. Associations of anemia with death and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the Chinese atrial fibrillation registry study. Clin Cardiol. (2022) 45(1):91–100. doi: 10.1002/clc.23764

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kalra PR, Greenlaw N, Ferrari R, Ford I, Tardif JC, Tendera M, et al. Hemoglobin and change in hemoglobin Status predict mortality, cardiovascular events, and bleeding in stable coronary artery disease. Am J Med. (2017) 130(6):720–30. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.01.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Manolis AA, Manolis TA, Melita H, Mikhailidis DP, Manolis AS. Low serum albumin: a neglected predictor in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur J Intern Med. (2022) 102:24–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.05.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Wada H, Dohi T, Miyauchi K, Shitara J, Endo H, Doi S, et al. Long-term clinical impact of serum albumin in coronary artery disease patients with preserved renal function. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. (2018) 28(3):285–90. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2017.11.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Nunez J, Minana G, Bodi V, Nunez E, Sanchis J, Husser O, et al. Low lymphocyte count and cardiovascular diseases. Curr Med Chem. (2011) 18(21):3226–33. doi: 10.2174/092986711796391633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Ibrahim H, Kleiman NS. Platelet pathophysiology, pharmacology, and function in coronary artery disease. Coron Artery Dis. (2017) 28(7):614–23. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000519

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kabat GC, Kim MY, Verma AK, Manson JE, Lin J, Lessin L, et al. Platelet count and total and cause-specific mortality in the women’s health initiative. Ann Epidemiol. (2017) 27(4):274–80. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.02.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Eckart A, Struja T, Kutz A, Baumgartner A, Baumgartner T, Zurfluh S, et al. Relationship of nutritional Status, inflammation, and Serum albumin levels during acute illness: a prospective study. Am J Med. (2020) 133(6):713–722.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.10.031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Sheinenzon A, Shehadeh M, Michelis R, Shaoul E, Ronen O. Serum albumin levels and inflammation. Int J Biol Macromol. (2021) 184:857–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.140

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Ganz T. Anemia of inflammation. N Engl J Med. (2019) 381(12):1148–57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1804281

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Xiang W, Chen X, Ye W, Li J, Zhang X, Xie D. Prognostic nutritional index for predicting 3-month outcomes in ischemic stroke patients undergoing thrombolysis. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:599. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00599

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Zhou J, Yang D. Prognostic significance of hemoglobin, albumin. Lymphocyte and Platelet (HALP) Score in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. (2023) 10:821–31. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S411521

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Tian M, Li Y, Wang X, Tian X, Pei LL, Wang X, et al. The hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score is associated with poor outcome of acute ischemic stroke. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:610318. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.610318

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Xu M, Chen L, Hu Y, Wu J, Wu Z, Yang S, et al. The HALP (hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet) score is associated with early-onset post-stroke cognitive impairment. Neurol Sci. (2023a) 44(1):237–45. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06414-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Xu H, Zheng X, Ai J, Yang L. Hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score and cancer prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13,110 patients. Int Immunopharmacol. (2023b) 114:109496. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109496

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Pan H, Lin S. Association of hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet score with risk of cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, and all-cause mortality in the general population: results from the NHANES 1999-2018. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2023) 14:1173399. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1173399

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Alharti SSY, Natto ZS, Midle JB, Gyurko R, O'Neill R, Steffensen B. Association between time since quitting smoking and periodontitis in former smokers in the national health and nutrition examination surveys (NHANES) 2009 to 2012. J Periodontol. (2019) 90(1):16–25. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0183

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, et al. The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA. (2018) 320(19):2020–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14854

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. McClure ST, Schlechter H, Oh S, White K, Wu B, Pilla SJ, et al. Dietary intake of adults with and without diabetes: results from NHANES 2013-2016. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. (2020) 8:1. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001681

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Guc ZG, Alacacioglu A, Kalender ME, Oflazoglu U, Unal S, Yildiz Y, et al. HALP score and GNRI: simple and easily accessible indexes for predicting prognosis in advanced stage NSCLC patients. The izmir oncology group (IZOG) study. Front Nutr. (2022) 9:905292. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.905292

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Li S, Gao Y, Liu K, Zhao J, Fang H, Tao Y, et al. The novel biomarkers-based HALP (hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet)-prognostic model for acute and subacute patients with cerebral venous Sinus thrombosis: a retrospective cohort study. J Atheroscler Thromb. (2023) 30(11):1742–9. doi: 10.5551/jat.64043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Wallentin L, Eriksson N, Olszowka M, Grammer TB, Hagstrom E, Held C, et al. Plasma proteins associated with cardiovascular death in patients with chronic coronary heart disease: a retrospective study. PLoS Med. (2021) 18(1):e1003513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003513

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Bianchi VE. Impact of nutrition on cardiovascular function. Curr Probl Cardiol. (2020) 45(1):100391. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2018.08.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Reininger AJ, Bernlochner I, Penz SM, Ravanat C, Smethurst P, Farndale RW, et al. A 2-step mechanism of arterial thrombus formation induced by human atherosclerotic plaques. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2010) 55(11):1147–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Bian C, Wu Y, Shi Y, Xu G, Wang J, Xiang M, et al. Predictive value of the relative lymphocyte count in coronary heart disease. Heart Vessels. (2010) 25(6):469–73. doi: 10.1007/s00380-010-0010-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Lam FW, Cruz MA, Leung HC, Parikh KS, Smith CW, Rumbaut RE. Histone induced platelet aggregation is inhibited by normal albumin. Thromb Res. (2013) 132(1):69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.04.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Taverna M, Marie AL, Mira JP, Guidet B. Specific antioxidant properties of human serum albumin. Ann Intensive Care. (2013) 3(1):4. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-3-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Wang M, Liu J, Ma C, Wang W, Liu X, Li Y, et al. Synergistic association of serum albumin and globulin with coronary heart disease. J Atheroscler Thromb. (2012) 19(7):619–32. doi: 10.5551/jat.10322

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Corral-Debrinski M, Shoffner JM, Lott MT, Wallace DC. Association of mitochondrial DNA damage with aging and coronary atherosclerotic heart disease. Mutat Res. (1992) 275(3-6):169–80. doi: 10.1016/0921-8734(92)90021-g

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Si J, Chen L, Yu C, Guo Y, Sun D, Pang Y, et al. Healthy lifestyle, DNA methylation age acceleration, and incident risk of coronary heart disease. Clin Epigenetics. (2023) 15(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13148-023-01464-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Gutierrez-Mariscal FM, Garcia-Rios A, Gomez-Luna P, Fernandez-Gandara C, Cardelo MP, de la Cruz-Ares S, et al. Age-dependent effect of metabolic phenotypes on carotid atherosclerotic disease in coronary heart disease patients (CORDIOPREV study). BMC Geriatr. (2020) 20(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01544-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Kocaoglu S, Alatli T. The efficiency of the HALP score and the modified HALP score in predicting mortality in patients with acute heart failure presenting to the emergency department. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. (2022) 32(6):706–11. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2022.06.706

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Dokoupil J, Hrecko J, Cermakova E, Adamcova M, Pudil R. Characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted for acute heart failure in a single-centre study. ESC Heart Fail. (2022) 9(4):2249–58. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13759

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: hemoglobin albumin lymphocyte and platelet score, all-cause mortality, coronary heart disease, NHANES, retrospective cohort study

Citation: Zheng Y, Huang Y and Li H (2023) Hemoglobin albumin lymphocyte and platelet score and all-cause mortality in coronary heart disease: a retrospective cohort study of NHANES database. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 10:1241217. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1241217

Received: 16 June 2023; Accepted: 17 October 2023;
Published: 13 November 2023.

Edited by:

Vikrant Rai, Western University of Health Sciences, United States

Reviewed by:

Yujiao Shi, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, China
Kangkang Liu, Sun Yat-sen University, China
Ivica Bosnjak, Osijek Clinical Hospital Center, Croatia

© 2023 Zheng, Huang and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Haitao Li bGhhaXRhb0xAb3V0bG9vay5jb20=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.