Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med., 05 July 2023
Sec. General Cardiovascular Medicine

Association between pre-existing cardiovascular disease, mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in hospitalised patients with COVID-19

\r\nHari P. Sritharan,Hari P. Sritharan1,2Kunwardeep S. BhatiaKunwardeep S. Bhatia3William van Gaal,William van Gaal4,5Leonard Kritharides,Leonard Kritharides2,6Clara K. Chow,Clara K. Chow2,7Ravinay Bhindi,
on behalf of the AUS-COVID investigators\r\nRavinay Bhindi1,2*on behalf of the AUS-COVID investigators
  • 1Department of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • 2Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • 3Department of Cardiology, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • 4Department of Cardiology, Northern Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • 5Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • 6Department of Cardiology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • 7Westmead Applied Research Centre and Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Background: Pre-existing cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors are common in patients with COVID-19 and there remain concerns for poorer in-hospital outcomes in this cohort. We aimed to analyse the relationship between pre-existing cardiovascular disease, mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in a prospective, multicentre observational study.

Method: This prospective, multicentre observational study included consecutive patients of age ≥18 in their index hospitalisation with laboratory-proven COVID-19 in Australia. Patients with suspected but not laboratory-proven COVID-19 and patients with no available past medical history were excluded. The primary exposure was pre-existing cardiovascular disease, defined as a composite of coronary artery disease, heart failure or cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation or flutter, severe valvular disease, peripheral arterial disease and stroke or transient ischaemic attack. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were clinical cardiovascular complications (new onset atrial fibrillation or flutter, high-grade atrioventricular block, sustained ventricular tachycardia, new heart failure or cardiomyopathy, pericarditis, myocarditis or myopericarditis, pulmonary embolism and cardiac arrest) and myocardial injury.

Results: 1,567 patients (mean age 60.7 (±20.5) years and 837 (53.4%) male) were included. Overall, 398 (25.4%) patients had pre-existing cardiovascular disease, 176 patients (11.2%) died, 75 (5.7%) had clinical cardiovascular complications and 345 (37.8%) had myocardial injury. Patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease had significantly increased in-hospital mortality (aOR: 1.76 95% CI: 1.21–2.55, p = 0.003) and myocardial injury (aOR: 3.27, 95% CI: 2.23–4.79, p < 0.001). There was no significant association between pre-existing cardiovascular disease and in-hospital clinical cardiovascular complications (aOR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.58–2.09, p = 0.766). On mediation analysis, the indirect effect and Sobel test were significant (p < 0.001), indicating that the relationship between pre-existing cardiovascular disease and in-hospital mortality was partially mediated by myocardial injury. Apart from age, other cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and hypertension had no significant impact on mortality, clinical cardiovascular complications or myocardial injury.

Conclusions: Pre-existing cardiovascular disease is associated with significantly higher mortality in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. This relationship may be partly explained by increased risk of myocardial injury among patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease which in turn is a marker associated with higher mortality.

1. Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was declared a pandemic in March 2020 with over 660 million cases and 6.5 million deaths to date (1). COVID-19 can affect the heart and vascular tissues through ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2), the host cell receptor for the viral spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and has been linked with cardiovascular complications, such as arrhythmias, myocardial injury and heart failure (2, 3). Pre-existing cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors are common in patients hospitalised with COVID-19, and given the cardiac manifestations of COVID-19 there remain concerns for poorer in-hospital outcomes in this patient cohort (4). These concerns stem in part from the increased mortality and cardiovascular complications in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease hospitalised with influenza (5).

Previous studies reporting on the link between pre-existing cardiovascular disease and COVID-19-related outcomes are conflicting, and largely limited by either having a single centre experience, non-generalisable population limited to the critical care setting or reduced data granularity associated with administrative databases (610). Moreover, healthcare systems across the world have faced considerable strain due to COVID-19, and the extent this pandemic context confounds the results of studies investigating COVID-19 outcomes, many performed in the earlier phases of the pandemic, remains unknown. Australia provides a unique context to study the outcomes of COVID-19 patients, with its geographical isolation and strict social distancing laws in the earlier phases of the pandemic mediating lower case numbers such that hospital systems could maintain the necessitated high level of care to all patients.

We present an analysis of the relationship between pre-existing cardiovascular disease, mortality and cardiovascular complications through leveraging the Australian Cardiovascular COVID-19 (AUS-COVID) registry, the largest Australian multicentre COVID-19 cardiovascular registry of adult hospitalised patients.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study design

The AUS-COVID study is a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study across 21 hospitals in Australia. The study was approved by the Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC 2020/ETH00732), who granted a waiver of consent. The registry was prospectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000486921).

2.2. Study population

All index hospitalisations of consecutive adult patients (≥18 years) with laboratory-proven SARS-CoV-2 infection (nucleic acid testing, serology testing or antigen detection) were included. Patients with suspected but not laboratory-proven SARS-CoV-2 infection and patients with no available past medical history were excluded. Patients were also excluded if they were transferred to another hospital, as their mortality and cardiovascular outcomes data would not be available. Patients were excluded if they were transferred from another hospital to avoid recruitment bias, given majority of the included sites were major tertiary centres.

2.3. Exposure and outcomes

The primary exposure was pre-existing cardiovascular disease, defined as a composite of a history of coronary artery disease, heart failure or cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation or flutter, severe valvular disease, peripheral arterial disease and stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), as documented in the medical records at time of admission. The secondary exposures were age, gender, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, current or recent smoking status (<1 year) and chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2).

The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were clinical cardiovascular complications as both individual and composite outcomes during hospitalisation, and myocardial injury during hospitalisation. Clinical cardiovascular complications during hospitalisation were defined as a composite endpoint of new onset atrial fibrillation or flutter, high-grade atrioventricular block, sustained ventricular tachycardia, new heart failure or cardiomyopathy, pericarditis, myocarditis or myopericarditis, pulmonary embolism and cardiac arrest. Myocardial injury was defined as troponin greater than the upper limit of normal for each site-specific assay. Pre-existing coronary artery disease was defined as prior myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, angina or greater than 50% stenosis of an epicardial vessel on coronary angiography. Heart failure or cardiomyopathy includes patients both with and without reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Atrial fibrillation was defined as patients with paroxysmal, persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation.

2.4. Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were reported as mean (standard deviation) and categorical variables were presented as proportions. Comparisons between groups were made with independent-samples t-test, Pearson's Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test for normally distributed continuous variables, categorical variables with expected cell size ≥5 and categorical variables with expected cell size <5 respectively.

Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios for mortality, clinical cardiovascular complications during hospitalisation and myocardial injury based on the primary exposure of pre-existing cardiovascular disease. The secondary exposure variables detailed earlier were all considered in the multivariable models. Stepwise models were created with each outcome as the dependent variable; model 0 was unadjusted and model 1 included covariates with p value <0.25 on univariate analysis.

Mediation analysis was conducted to examine whether the relationship between pre-existing cardiovascular disease and in-hospital mortality was mediated by myocardial injury. This analysis was conducted using the following steps: first, we regressed in-hospital mortality on pre-existing cardiovascular disease; second, we regressed myocardial injury on pre-existing cardiovascular disease; and third, we regressed pre-existing cardiovascular disease on both in-hospital mortality and myocardial injury. The indirect effect of pre-existing cardiovascular disease on in-hospital mortality through myocardial injury was estimated using the Sobel test.

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Subscription [Version 29.0.0.0 (241)]. Results were considered statistically significant if the 2-sided p value was <0.05.

3. Results

1,714 patients were included in the AUS-COVID registry with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection across 21 Australian hospitals. 1,567 patients were eligible for inclusion in the primary analysis (Figure 1). 90 patients were excluded because their past medical history was unavailable, and 57 patients were excluded because they were transferred to another hospital on discharge. The known admission dates for patients included in this study were from 04/01/2021 to 11/07/2022. This includes patients across time periods where the Alpha (B.1.1.7), Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (B.1.1.529) variants of SARS-CoV-2 predominated in Australia.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. STROBE flow diagram of study population.

Table 1 summarises the demographics, clinical characteristics and the baseline medication exposure of patients on admission. The mean age of included patients was 60.7 (±20.5) years and 837 (53.4%) patients were males. Overall, 398 (25.4%) patients had pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Of these, 174 (11.1%) patients had coronary artery disease, 106 (6.8%) patients had heart failure or cardiomyopathy, 162 (10.3%) patients had atrial fibrillation or flutter, 40 (2.6%) patients had severe valvular disease, 93 (5.9%) patients had stroke or transient ischaemic attack and 21 (1.3%) patients had peripheral arterial disease. Patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease were older (76.2 ± 14.6 years vs. 55.4 ± 19.6 years, p < 0.001) and a significantly higher incidence of hypertension (71.9% vs. 34.2%, p < 0.001), hypercholesterolemia (48.2% vs. 21.9%, p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (35.4% vs. 19.8%, p < 0.001) and chronic kidney disease (19.1% vs. 4.3%, p < 0.001).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographics and clinical characteristics on admission.

Table 2 details the primary and secondary outcomes and markers of disease severity for included patients. During hospitalisation, 176 patients (11.2%) died, 75 (5.7%) had clinical cardiovascular complications and 345 (37.8%) had myocardial injury. Patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease had a higher incidence of mortality (25.6% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.001), clinical cardiovascular complications (8.5% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.078) and myocardial injury (72.5% vs. 25.1%, p < 0.001). With respect to markers of COVID-19 disease severity, 254 patients (16.2%) were admitted to the intensive care unit, with a significantly lower proportion of patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease admitted to ICU compared to those without pre-existing cardiovascular disease (11.6% vs. 17.8%, p < 0.004). 116 (7.4%) patients were intubated, 64 (4.1%) patients were given intravenous positive inotropes or vasopressors and 2 (0.1%) patients were placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Coronary angiography was performed in 9 patients; 1 patient proceeded to have percutaneous coronary intervention and 1 patient had coronary artery bypass graft surgery for triple vessel coronary artery disease.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Primary and secondary outcomes and markers of COVID-19 disease severity for patients with and without pre-existing cardiovascular disease.

3.1. In-hospital mortality

On univariable analysis, pre-existing cardiovascular disease (OR: 5.10, 95% CI: 3.68–7.06, p < 0.001), age (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.08–1.11, p < 0.001), hypertension (OR: 3.22, 95% CI: 2.30–4.50, p < 0.001), hypercholesterolemia (OR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.35–2.58, p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.32–2.58, p < 0.001) and chronic kidney disease (OR: 4.08, 95% CI: 2.68–6.20, p < 0.001) were associated with significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality (Table 3). Current or recent smoking status (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.20–0.96, p = 0.033) was also associated with significantly decreased odds of in-hospital mortality on univariable analysis.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Association between pre-existing cardiovascular disease and in-hospital mortality, clinical cardiovascular complications & myocardial injury.

In the multivariable model, pre-existing cardiovascular disease (aOR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.21–2.55, p = 0.003), age (aOR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.07–1.10, p < 0.001) and chronic kidney disease (aOR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.14–2.94, p = 0.013) were associated with significantly increased odds of in-hospital mortality (Figure 2, Table 3). The multivariable binary logistic regression model was statistically significant [χ2(7) = 274.295, p < 0.001], explained 31.8% (Nagelkerke R2) of the variance in in-hospital mortality and correctly classified 88.6% of cases. The model fit the data well using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test [χ2(8) = 7.897, p = 0.444].

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Forrest plot for multivariable logistic regression for in-hospital mortality.

3.2. Clinical cardiovascular complications

There was no statistically significant association between pre-existing cardiovascular disease and the individual clinical cardiovascular complication endpoints of new onset atrial fibrillation or flutter (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 0.69–3.45, p = 0.289), high-grade atrioventricular block (OR: 4.43, 95% CI: 0.74–26.62, p = 0.107), sustained conscious ventricular tachycardia (OR: 2.94, 95% CI: 0.18–47.15, p = 0.444), new heart failure or cardiomyopathy (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 1.30–1.38, p = 1.000), myocarditis or myopericarditis (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.30–1.38, p = 0.338), pulmonary embolism (OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 0.63–3.48, p = 0.369) and cardiac arrest (OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 0.60–5.68, p = 0.277) (Table 2).

With respect to the composite endpoint of clinical cardiovascular complications, age (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.03, p < 0.001), hypertension (OR: 1.69, 95% 1.07–2.70, p = 0.025), hypercholesterolemia (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.05–2.76, p = 0.029) and chronic kidney disease (OR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.10–4.80, p = 0.023) were associated with significantly increased odds on univariable analysis. There was no statistically significant association between pre-existing cardiovascular disease (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 0.94–3.04, p = 0.078) and in-hospital clinical cardiovascular complications on univariable analysis. In the multivariable model, only age (aOR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00–1.03, p = 0.030) was significantly associated with increased odds of clinical cardiovascular complications; pre-existing cardiovascular disease (aOR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.58–2.09, p = 0.766) had no significant association (Table 3). The multivariable binary logistic regression model was statistically significant [χ2(6) = 14.225, p = 0.027], explained 3.0% (Nagelkerke R2) of the variance in clinical cardiovascular complications and correctly classified 94.3% of cases. The model fit the data well using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test [χ2(8) = 9.973, p = 0.267].

3.3. Myocardial injury

On univariable analysis, pre-existing cardiovascular disease (OR: 7.86, 95% CI: 5.65–10.95, p < 0.001), age (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.03, p < 0.001), hypertension (OR: 3.84, 95% CI: 2.89–5.09, p < 0.001), hypercholesterolemia (OR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.77–3.15, p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.46–2.73, p < 0.001) and chronic kidney disease (OR: 7.80, 95% CI: 4.49–13.53, p < 0.001) were associated with significantly increased odds of myocardial injury.

In the multivariable model, pre-existing cardiovascular disease (aOR: 3.27, 95% CI: 2.23–4.79, p < 0.001), age (aOR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.05–1.07, p < 0.001) and chronic kidney disease (aOR: 4.41, 95% CI: 2.29–8.47, p < 0.001) were associated with significantly increased odds of myocardial injury (Table 3). The multivariable binary logistic regression model was statistically significant [χ2(7) = 349.340, p < 0.001], explained 43.3% (Nagelkerke R2) of the variance in myocardial injury and correctly classified 78.6% of cases. The model fit the data well using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test [χ2(8) = 12.485, p = 0.131].

The mediation analysis diagram is depicted in Figure 3. Overall, pre-existing cardiovascular disease had a significant indirect effect on in-hospital mortality through myocardial injury (indirect effect = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.05–0.10; p < 0.001), and this mediation effect was confirmed by a significant Sobel test (z = 7.12, p < 0.001). These results suggest that myocardial injury partially mediates the relationship between pre-existing cardiovascular disease and in-hospital mortality.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Mediation analysis diagram for pre-existing cardiovascular disease, myocardial injury and in-hospital mortality.

4. Discussion

This prospective, multicentre observational study of 1,567 adult, hospitalised patients investigated the association between pre-existing cardiovascular disease and outcomes of mortality, clinical cardiovascular complications and myocardial injury. Pre-existing cardiovascular disease was frequently seen in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 and independently associated with significantly increased odds of mortality and myocardial injury, without significant difference in other clinical cardiovascular complications such as arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy or heart failure, pulmonary embolism and myocarditis. Apart from age, other cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and hypertension had no significant impact on mortality, clinical cardiovascular complications or myocardial injury. However, chronic kidney disease was independently associated with significantly increased odds of mortality and myocardial injury. Cumulatively, these findings suggest that pre-existing cardiovascular disease rather than cardiovascular risk factors portend increased mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. This association is partially mediated by myocardial injury, rather than other clinical cardiovascular complications.

The incidence of pre-existing cardiovascular disease in our study was comparable to other international studies. However, data regarding the prognostic impact of pre-existing cardiovascular disease and other cardiovascular risk factors in these studies is conflicting (7, 10, 11). A multicentre, American study of 5,133 patients found a significant association between cardiovascular risk factors and mortality, rather than pre-existing cardiovascular disease. However, this study focused on patients admitted to the intensive care unit only in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and limited the definition of pre-existing cardiovascular disease to coronary artery disease, heart failure and atrial fibrillation (10). A prospective cohort study of 1,604 patients from the Netherlands also found a significant association between cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and diabetes and mortality, however this analysis could not adjust for the presence of pre-existing cardiovascular disease as this information was not routinely collected and cardiovascular medication use was used as a surrogate exposure instead (12). A cohort study in the United Kingdom of 1,721 patients found comparable results to us, with pre-existing cardiovascular disease rather than cardiovascular risk factors associated with increased mortality (7). Moreover, patients with heart failure and particularly those with reduced ejection fraction have been identified as a high-risk cohort with poorer outcomes from COVID-19 (13).

The greater mortality risk associated with pre-existing cardiovascular disease, rather than other cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes and hypertension, observed in our study lends to questions about the mechanisms that underpin this signal. A potential mechanism is that patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease have an increased propensity for myocardial injury, which in combination with the extra-cardiac manifestations of COVID-19 due to a multisystem inflammatory response, lend to a poorer prognosis (1416). This notion is supported by autopsy series in patients with COVID-19 demonstrating myocardial infiltration with macrophages and multiple thrombi in the coronary circulation; thereby suggesting diffuse myocardial inflammation and microvascular thrombi as the histopathological drivers of cardiac involvement in acute COVID-19 (17, 18). The significant mediation analysis finding in our study and the lack of a significant association between pre-existing cardiovascular disease and clinical cardiovascular complications, further reinforces the potential role of myocardial injury in mediating poorer outcomes in this population. Notably, most deaths in patients both with and without pre-existing cardiovascular disease in our study were not cardiovascular in nature. Given the predominance of other causes of mortality, the mediatory role of myocardial injury in all-cause, in-hospital mortality may reflect its role as a sensitive marker of systemic illness severity rather than a mechanistic pathway for mortality (19). Further studies examining the role of anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory medications in mitigating myocardial injury, systemic illness severity and mortality in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease specifically are needed. Moreover, an increased burden of cardiovascular disease has been described in the longer term after COVID-19 infection, with putative mechanisms including a persistent, aberrantly hyperactive immune response (20, 21). The longer-term implications of myocardial injury during acute COVID-19 infection in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease remains to be explored.

There are some limitations to this analysis. Firstly, whilst we were able to adjust for potential confounding factors such as diabetes and age in this study, wamcthe AUS-COVID Registry lacks sufficient data on body mass index and does not include information on race, which are potentially significant confounders that are not accounted for in the multivariable models. Additionally, the registry only reports on in-hospital mortality, and long-term data is not available. Furthermore, there are limitations related to missing data, as the study relies on data extracted from electronic medical records during a pandemic setting without routine investigations, which may result in incomplete information, particularly when studying myocardial injury as an outcome. Moreover, information regarding adequate or inadequate treatment of cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and hypertension in patients included in this study are lacking and should be considered when interpreting our findings regarding the effect of these cardiovascular risk factors on patient outcomes. Despite these limitations, this study is significant as it utilizes the first and largest multicentre Australian registry that focuses on cardiovascular comorbidities among adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19. The Australian context for the COVID-19 pandemic remains uniquely relevant to current care for COVID-19 patients as it represents a healthcare system that was not overwhelmed by the COVID-19 pandemic, where hospital systems could maintain the necessitated high level of care to all patients with COVID-19. Another strength of our study is that it includes all hospitalized patients with laboratory-proven COVID-19, including patients admitted to the intensive care unit, lending to its increased generalisability to a wider population.

5. Conclusion

Pre-existing cardiovascular disease portends significantly higher mortality in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. This association may be partly explained by increased risk of myocardial injury among patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease which in turn is a marker associated with higher mortality.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

This study involving human participants was reviewed and approved by the Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC 2020/ETH00732), who granted a waiver of consent.

Author contributions

HS: conceptualization, methodology, statistical analysis, writing, review and editing. KB: methodology, validation, review, and editing. WG, LK, CC & RB: conceptualization, methodology, review, and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study is supported by unrestricted grants from the Paul Ramsay Foundation and the Northern Sydney Local Health District.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. WHO. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. (2023). Available at: https://covid19.who.int/ (Cited 13 January, 2023).

2. Arentz M, Yim E, Klaff L, Lokhandwala S, Riedo FX, Chong M, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of 21 critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Washington state. JAMA. (2020) 323(16):1612–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4326

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. (2020) 395(10223):497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Bhatia KS, Sritharan HP, Chia J, Ciofani J, Nour D, Chui K, et al. Cardiac complications in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in Australia. Heart Lung Circ. (2021) 30(12):1834–40. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.08.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bhugra P, Grandhi GR, Mszar R, Satish P, Singh R, Blaha M, et al. Determinants of influenza vaccine uptake in patients with cardiovascular disease and strategies for improvement. J Am Heart Assoc. (2021) 10(15):e019671. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019671

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Li J, Guo T, Dong D, Zhang X, Chen X, Feng Y, et al. Defining heart disease risk for death in COVID-19 infection. QJM. (2020) 113(12):876–82. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcaa246

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. O'Gallagher K, Shek A, Bean DM, Bendayan R, Papachristidis A, Teo JTH, et al. Pre-existing cardiovascular disease rather than cardiovascular risk factors drives mortality in COVID-19. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. (2021) 21(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02137-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Rastad H, Karim H, Ejtahed HS, Tajbakhsh R, Noorisepehr M, Babaei M, et al. Risk and predictors of in-hospital mortality from COVID-19 in patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Diabetol Metab Syndr. (2020) 12:57. doi: 10.1186/s13098-020-00565-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Singh AK, Gillies CL, Singh R, Singh A, Chudasama Y, Coles B, et al. Prevalence of co-morbidities and their association with mortality in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. (2020) 22(10):1915–24. doi: 10.1111/dom.14124

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Vasbinder A, Meloche C, Azam TU, Anderson E, Catalan T, Shadid H, et al. Relationship between preexisting cardiovascular disease and death and cardiovascular outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. (2022) 15(10):e008942. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.008942

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Matsushita K, Ding N, Kou M, Hu X, Chen M, Gao Y, et al. The relationship of COVID-19 severity with cardiovascular disease and its traditional risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob Heart. (2020) 15(1):64. doi: 10.5334/gh.814

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Collard D, Nurmohamed NS, Kaiser Y, Reeskamp LF, Dormans T, Moeniralam H, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors and COVID-19 outcomes in hospitalised patients: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. (2021) 11(2):e045482. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045482

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. John KJ, Mishra AK, Ramasamy C, George AA, Selvaraj V, Lal A. Heart failure in COVID-19 patients: critical care experience. World J Virol. (2022) 11(1):1–19. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v11.i1.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Izquierdo-Marquisá A, Cubero-Gallego H, Aparisi Á, Vaquerizo B, Ribas-Barquet N. Myocardial injury in COVID-19 and its implications in short- and long-term outcomes. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2022) 9:901245. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.901245

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Zheng YY, Ma YT, Zhang JY, Xie X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2020) 17(5):259–60. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0360-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Mishra AK, Sahu KK, George AA, Lal A. A review of cardiac manifestations and predictors of outcome in patients with COVID-19. Heart Lung. (2020) 49(6):848–52. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.04.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Bois MC, Boire NA, Layman AJ, Aubry MC, Alexander MP, Roden AC, et al. COVID-19-associated nonocclusive fibrin microthrombi in the heart. Circulation. (2021) 143(3):230–43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050754

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Lindner D, Fitzek A, Bräuninger H, Aleshcheva G, Edler C, Meissner K, et al. Association of cardiac infection with SARS-CoV-2 in confirmed COVID-19 autopsy cases. JAMA Cardiol. (2020) 5(11):1281–5. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3551

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Muthyala A, Sasidharan S, John KJ, Lal A, Mishra AK. Utility of cardiac bioenzymes in predicting cardiovascular outcomes in SARS-CoV-2. World J Virol. (2022) 11(5):375–90. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v11.i5.375

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wang W, Wang CY, Wang SI, Wei JC. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in COVID-19 survivors among non-vaccinated population: a retrospective cohort study from the TriNetX US collaborative networks. EClinicalMedicine. (2022) 53:101619. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101619

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Xie Y, Xu E, Bowe B, Al-Aly Z. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes of COVID-19. Nat Med. (2022) 28(3):583–90. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01689-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: COVID-19, cardiovascular disease, myocardial injury, mortality, troponin

Citation: Sritharan HP, Bhatia KS, van Gaal W, Kritharides L, Chow CK and Bhindi R (2023) Association between pre-existing cardiovascular disease, mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 10:1224886. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1224886

Received: 18 May 2023; Accepted: 22 June 2023;
Published: 5 July 2023.

Edited by:

Nicola Mumoli, ASST Ovest Milanese, Italy

Reviewed by:

Ajay Kumar Mishra, Saint Vincent Hospital, United States
Mahmoud Nassar, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States
Mohammed Faisaluddin, Rochester General Hospital, United States

© 2023 Sritharan, Bhatia, van Gaal, Kritharides, Chow and Bhindi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ravinay Bhindi ravinay.bhindi@sydney.edu.au

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.