Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med., 23 May 2022
Sec. General Cardiovascular Medicine
This article is part of the Research Topic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Advancements in diagnosis, biomarkers, drug therapeutics, surgical and endovascular treatment View all 21 articles

Association Between Metformin and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Meta-Analysis

\nWenqiang Niu&#x;Wenqiang Niu1Juan Shao&#x;Juan Shao2Benxiang YuBenxiang Yu1Guolong LiuGuolong Liu1Ran WangRan Wang3Hengyang DongHengyang Dong1Haijie Che
Haijie Che1*Lubin Li
Lubin Li1*
  • 1Department of Vascular Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, China
  • 2Department of Dermatology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, China
  • 3Nursing Department, Heze Medical College, Heze, China

Objective: To systematically examine the association between metformin and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and provide a basis for the treatment of AAA.

Methods: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Ovid databases were searched by computer to identify the literature related to metformin and AAA published until February 2022. The literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, data were extracted, and a quality assessment was conducted. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 and RevMan 5.3 software.

Results: Seven articles containing a total of 10 cohort studies (85,050 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Meta-analysis showed that metformin can limit the expansion of AAA (MD = – 0.72, 95% CI: – 1.08 ~ −0.37, P < 0.00001), as well as reduce AAA repair or AAA rupture-related mortality (OR = 0.80, 95% CI:0.66 ~ 0.96, P = 0.02). The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Metformin can limit the expansion of AAA and reduce the incidence of AAA and postoperative mortality. However, further biological experiments and clinical trials still need to be conducted to support this.

Introduction

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a common asymptomatic disease with a prevalence of 1.2–4% in people over the age of 50 (14). If left untreated, AAA can progress to aneurysm rupture and seriously threaten the patient's life. Despite significant advances in research on the genetic, metabolic, and environmental risks associated with aortic aneurysms and population-based disease screening programs, thousands of patients die prematurely due to aneurysm-related events. Studies have reported that the average annual mortality rate from aortic aneurysms worldwide is 2.8/100,000, which has increased by 12% over the past 20 years (5).

AAA remains a significant preventable cause of death in the early twenty-first century. According to the guidelines, aggressive surgical intervention is recommended for larger diameter AAA or symptomatic AAA. However, with improved screening and appropriate examination equipment, many cases of AAA can be detected at a very young age when they are asymptomatic. However, regular imaging can only monitor this type of AAA. Relevant studies have reported that up to 70% of this type of AAA will eventually grow to the size requiring surgical repair (6, 7). Currently, there is no medical treatment that can inhibit the growth of small AAA. Therefore, in recent years, domestic and international researchers have been committed to exploring the non-surgical treatment of AAA, hoping to limit the further expansion of AAA in a non-invasive fashion and achieve the goal of avoiding surgical treatment or delaying the time of operation.

Despite the fact that numerous clinical trials have proven that pharmacological interventions are ineffective in limiting the AAA enlargement or disease progression, studies in various population groups have demonstrated a negative correlation between diabetes and the prevalence, growth, and rupture of AAA (810). The causal mechanism behind this correlation is not yet precisely understood but may be related to hyperglycemia, the effect of antidiabetic drugs, or other factors of the diabetic environment (11, 12). It is well-known that metformin is one of the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of diabetes. Experimental studies have shown that it inhibits the proliferation of aortic smooth muscle cells and the expression of extracellular matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2. It also reduces oxidative stress (1316). Therefore, metformin could potentially become a drug that will be used in the future to treat AAA.

Nevertheless, the association between metformin and AAA remains unclear. To help clarify the available epidemiological evidence, we conducted a meta-analysis of the literature on metformin and AAA published until February 2022 to further explore the relationship between metformin and AAA.

Methods

Search Strategy

This meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) (17, 18). The literature on metformin and AAA was systematically searched in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Ovid databases until February 2022. The search terms included “Metformin (Dimethylbiguanidine, Dimethylguanylguanidine, Glucophage, Metformin Hydrochloride, Hydrochloride, Metformin, Metformin HCl, HCl, Metformin),” “Aortic aneurysm (Aneurysms, Aortic, Aortic Aneurysms, Aneurysm, Aortic),” “Aortic dilatation,” and “Cohort Study.” Two reviewers (RW and HD) independently browsed all articles and selected only cohort studies to be included in this review. There were no language restrictions for the included studies. The analysis was based on published articles and conference abstracts with available statistical data and charts. Authors were contacted to provide additional data from their studies, if necessary. The relevant literature from the reference lists of the included articles was also manually searched, screened, and reviewed.

Criteria for Inclusion and Exclusion

In our opinion, if these studies were cohort studies in adult diabetic patients with a minimum duration of 8 weeks of metformin pharmacologic intervention, the article clearly demonstrates the effect of metformin pharmacologic therapy on change in aortic aneurysm diameter or on events related to aortic dilation as outcome results, we consider these studies eligible for inclusion. The cohort study articles contained risk estimates of OR, RR, or HR with a corresponding 95% CI.

We excluded (1) observational and retrospective studies; and (2) Studies with Intervention Duration <8 Weeks, and (3) reviews, case reports, comments, recommendations, letters, ongoing trials, protocols, conference abstracts, consensus or statements, and articles lacking applicable data; and (4) studies that could not be utilized, such as duplicate reports, as well as studies of poor quality, of an inconsistent type, or with too little information, and (5) studies with inappropriate statistical methods and insufficient data.

Data Extraction

Two researchers (RW and HD) searched for relevant articles, screened eligible articles based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and independently extracted data using a standardized datasheet. Disagreements were resolved by discussion with a third researcher (GL). We extracted basic information (author, year, country), type of study, inclusion criteria, participants and their number, interventions (metformin), and results. We compared treatment strategies for aortic changes with or without metformin medication in patients with aortic aneurysms, without the limitation of treatment history. The results of evaluation were as follows: trends in aortic diameter and AAA repair or AAA rupture related mortality.

Quality Assessment

The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of all studies (19). The NOS checklist contains three quality parameters: (1) selected population, (2) comparability, and (3) assessment of exposure or outcome in cohort studies. Each study was scored from zero to nine. Studies that scored ≥ seven were considered high-quality articles.

Data Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Stata16.0 and Review Manager 5.3 software. We used MD and the corresponding 95% CI to account for continuous data and OR to account for dichotomous results (20). P <0.05 indicated statistical significance. The I2 statistic, which reflects the proportion of heterogeneity, was used to analyze inconsistency in the results. With I2 <50% and insignificant heterogeneity, the fixed-effects model was used. With I2 ≥ 50% and significant heterogeneity, the sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the source of heterogeneity (21). The random-effects model was used if the cause of heterogeneity could not be determined (22).

Results

Study Inclusion

By searching the relevant literature, 91 articles were retrieved and screened according to the established inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a total of seven articles were included in the review (Figure 1). The seven articles contained a total of 10 cohort studies with 85,050 participants. The relevant characteristics of the included literature are displayed in Table 1.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Flow chart presenting the screening process.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies.

Study Quality

According to the NOS scale, the quality evaluation scores of seven cohort study articles were ≥ 7, and the quality was high (Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

Result of the Meta-Analysis

Association Between Metformin and Enlargement of Abdominal Aortic Diameter

We analyzed eight cohort studies that enrolled 16,111 patients (prescribe metformin: 5,984 participants; not prescribe metformin: 10,127 participants) to assess the association between metformin and abdominal aortic diameter enlargement. The analysis showed significant heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 83%, P <0.00001). Forest plots showed that metformin inhibited the enlargement of abdominal aortic diameter compared to patients not treated with metformin drugs (MD = −0.72, 95% CI: – 1.08 ~ −0.37, P <0.00001) (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Forest plot for the enlargement of abdominal aortic diameter.

The Egger test was subsequently performed. The results showed t = −3.03 (P = 0.023), indicating that the meta-analysis findings were subject to publication bias (30, 31). To identify the source of heterogeneity, we further performed the sensitivity analysis and re-did the meta-analysis, removing studies using the item-by-item method. After excluding Fujimura et al., the meta-analysis showed significantly reduced heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 39%, P <0.00001) (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Forest plot after excluding the data on the enlargement of abdominal aortic diameter by Fujimura et al.

AAA Repair or AAA Rupture-Related Mortality

Five cohort studies with 75,593 patients analyzed AAA repair or AAA rupture-related mortality changes. There was significant heterogeneity among the cohort studies (I2 = 76%, P = 0.002). The results showed that AAA repair or AAA rupture-related mortality was significantly lower in the group taking metformin than in the group not taking metformin (OR = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.66 ~ 0.96, P = 0.02). Further, the Egger test showed t = −2.12 (P = 0.124) (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Forest plot for AAA repair or AAA rupture-related mortality.

Discussion

In this study, a meta-analysis of seven included cohort studies was conducted, in which the relationship between metformin and AAA was examined using the degree of abdominal aortic diameter enlargement as an index. The results showed that metformin limited the enlargement of AAA diameter. At the same time, metformin also reduced AAA repair or AAA rupture-related mortality.

Over the past 20 years, significant progress has been made in the open or endovascular surgical treatment of large, symptomatic, and ruptured AAA. However, there is still a gap in the pharmacological inhibition of minor AAA enlargement. Although numerous clinical trials have shown that pharmacological interventions are ineffective in limiting AAA expansion or disease progression, the available evidence suggests that patients with diabetes are less likely to develop AAA. When an aneurysm is present, they also have a slower rate of aneurysm progression or expansion. Despite the many common risk factors for the development of aneurysmal and cardiovascular diseases, the paradoxical relationship between diabetes and aneurysmal disease remains controversial and insufficiently substantiated for interpretation (32, 33).

In one of the largest studies on the association between diabetes and AAA, which involved 5,697 patients, the results showed that AAA increased by an average of 2.2 mm per year. However, patients with diabetes had an average decrease in AAA growth of 0.5 mm per year compared to patients without diabetes (34). A study by Kristensen et al. (35) reported that AAA patients with high hemoglobin A1c had a slower rate of increase in the aortic vessel diameter than patients with low hemoglobin A1c, regardless of whether the patients had diabetes. A prolonged hyperglycemic environment leads to glycosylation of the extracellular matrix, which further leads to cross-linking of collagen and elastin in the aortic wall. Compared to non-cross-linked collagen, the cross-linked extracellular matrix is more difficult for proteases to cleave, which reduces the release of matrix metalloproteinases and cytokines from inflammatory cells such as monocytes (8, 36). However, a study conducted in 2017 involving 628,264 people who were screened for vascular disease reported that among people without diabetes, the risk of developing an aortic aneurysm increased with higher blood glucose levels in the non-diabetic range, while patients diagnosed with diabetes had a lower risk of aortic aneurysm (37). From this report, we can suggest that the negative association between diabetes and the prevalence and growth of an aortic aneurysm may be due to treatment rather than the presence of diabetes.

In the pharmacological treatment of diabetes, metformin is the drug used for the longest treatment. In cardiovascular disease, there is increasing evidence that metformin protects blood vessels by inhibiting the production of reactive oxygen species, the activity of inflammatory nuclear factor-kB, targets of the mammalian rapamycin (antifungal antibiotic) pathway, autophagy, and mural angiogenesis (38). In rodent studies, it has been reported that metformin inhibits pathological mechanisms of aortic inflammation, extracellular matrix remodeling, and oxidative stress involved in AAA (23, 39).

Metformin is one of the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of diabetes. To support our results, researchers have conducted animal experiments with metformin and modeled an AAA model with porcine pancreatic elastase in normoglycemic mice. The results showed that the incidence and growth rate of AAA were significantly decreased in mice taking metformin. At the same time, it was also shown that in the AAA mouse model modeled by angiotensin II, metformin had a protective effect on aneurysms, and this protective mechanism was associated with its ability to activate the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway (39). In addition, as oral hypoglycemic drugs, thiazolidinediones (e.g., pyrazine, rosiglitazone, etc.) regulate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (a nuclear hormone receptor family transcription factor), thereby affecting the activity of matrix metalloprotein−9 (MMP-9) and the release of cytokines. Dipeptidyl peptidase—4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (e.g., salbutamol, sitagliptin, etc.) can also reduce the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by mitochondria.

A study by Hsu et al. (40) on the relationship between the use of oral hypoglycemic drugs and the risk for aortic aneurysm showed that in patients with diabetes, that risk was lower in patients taking metformin than in those not taking it. Another study by Kristensen et al. (41) showed that patients who took metformin for a prolonged period of time had a lower rate of abdominal aortic aneurysm enlargement relative to those who took metformin for a long time. This also supports the finding that metformin limits the expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eight additional meta-analyses, including 29,587 patients, reported that metformin significantly inhibited aortic aneurysm enlargement in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (95% CI: −1.38 ~ −0.28) (42). A recent meta-analysis of 10 studies reported that in patients with type 2 diabetes, metformin drugs reduced the rate of aneurysm diameter growth (MD = −0.67, 95% CI: – 1.20 ~ −0.15) and the probability of AAA occurrence (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.4 ~ 0.92) (43). This is similar to the results of our review, in which we included more experimental studies that were cohort-based, potentially reducing selection bias. The results indicated that metformin inhibits the progression of aortic aneurysm diameter and reduces the incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm and associated mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

Relevant studies have shown that atherosclerosis and AAA share common risk factors, including gender, advanced age, hypertension, and smoking. Therefore, atherosclerosis may be considered a potential pathophysiological mechanism of AAA (44, 45). Vessels are constantly stimulated by hemodynamic perturbations, which lead to changes in vascular smooth muscle cells and promote the release of matrix remodeling enzymes, resulting in vascular structure remodeling. At the same time, due to atherosclerosis, vascular smooth muscle cells get destroyed and lose their function, which promotes the expansion of the intima and ultimately leads to localized medial thinning and rupture of the aortic wall. Sarajlić et al. (46) speculated that hereditary diseases might correlate with diabetes, limiting the progression of AAA. The authors noted that multiple effector kinases are involved in both the AAA and atherosclerotic pathways, which may only be affected by genetic mutations that disrupt the aneurysm pathway. Chen et al. (47) have shown that metformin drugs are feasible for treating cardiovascular disease due to their anti-atherosclerotic and lipid-lowering effects. Some studies suggest that the anti-atherosclerosis effect of metformin may be related to its own effect, further reducing carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) (48). Another explanation is that metformin drugs are able to inhibit macrophage apoptosis to a certain extent, reduce lipid deposition, and block the process of vascular atherosclerosis development (49).

Metformin has an omnidirectional mode of action, and although it has been used in the treatment of diabetes for more than 60 years, its exact mechanism of action in therapy is still not fully understood (50). According to the findings of in vitro studies and animal models, metformin may inhibit the pathological progression of AAA through a variety of mechanisms, including limiting aortic inflammation and reducing extracellular matrix remodeling and oxidative stress (23, 51). It has also been shown that an aneurysm enlargement that metformin inhibits may be associated with decreased secretion of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) (8). Despite this, there is no uniform consensus regarding the mechanism by which metformin limits the AAA enlargement, which warrants further experimental studies in this area.

In the included literature, studies on the relationship between metformin and AAA were confounded by multiple factors, including age, race, region, and other drugs used to treat diabetes. This may have biased the results of our meta-analysis. In general, we concluded that metformin limited the expansion of AAA, however, there was large variability in the studies. Through the sensitivity analysis, we were able to identify that the source of heterogeneity was likely in the Fujimura et al. (23) study. In that study, the dilatation rate of the abdominal aorta was much higher than in other included studies, and the follow-up time was also longer. However, the quality score for that study was high, its content was sufficient, and the experimental design was reasonable. Based on these quality assessment criteria, there was no reason to exclude the study from the meta-analysis, and its results also show that metformin limits the expansion of AAA.

The limitation of this meta-analysis is that there are only a few existing studies on the relationship between metformin and aortic aneurysm, so the number of articles included in the review is small. At the same time, some studies had smaller sample sizes and shorter follow-up times. Larger samples and longer follow-ups are still needed for further long-term exploration of the association between metformin and AAA. In addition, there is no uniform clinical standard for measuring and reporting AAA, which contributes to differences in accuracy and leads to heterogeneity.

Conclusions

In summary, we performed a meta-analysis on the association between metformin and AAA. We found that metformin limits the expansion of AAA to a certain extent and reduces the incidence of AAA and postoperative mortality. However, since the mechanism by which metformin inhibits AAA is not precise, further biological experiments and clinical trials are needed to fully elucidate its mode of action.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author Contributions

LL and WN: conception and design. GL, RW, and HD: collection and assembly of data. WN, JS, and BY: data analysis and interpretation and manuscript writing. LL and HC: revision of manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Alund M, Mani K, Wanhainen A. Selective screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm among patients referred to the vascular laboratory. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. (2008) 35:669–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.12.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Baumgartner I, Hirsch AT, Abola MT, Cacoub PP, Poldermans D, Steg PG, et al. Cardiovascular risk profile and outcome of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm in out-patients with atherothrombosis: data from the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry. J Vasc Surg. (2008) 48:808–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.05.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Chute EP, Hye RJ, Makaroun MS, et al. The aneurysm detection and management study screening program: validation cohort and final results. Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators. Arch Intern Med. (2000) 160:1425–30. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.10.1425

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. (2005) 330:750. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38369.620162.82

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Sampson UK, Norman PE, Fowkes FG, Aboyans V, Yanna Song, Harrell FE Jr, et al. Global and regional burden of aortic dissection and aneurysms: mortality trends in 21 world regions, 1990 to 2010. Glob Heart. (2014) 9:171–80. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2013.12.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, Bossone E, Bartolomeo RD, Eggebrecht H, et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur Heart J. (2014) 35:2873–926. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Cao P, De Rango P, Verzini F, Parlani G, Romano L, Cieri E, et al. Comparison of surveillance versus aortic endografting for small aneurysm repair (CAESAR): results from a randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. (2011) 41:13–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.08.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Golledge J, Karan M, Moran CS, Muller J, Clancy P, Dear AE, et al. Reduced expansion rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with diabetes may be related to aberrant monocyte-matrix interactions. Eur Heart J. (2008) 29:665–72. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm557

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Takagi H, Umemoto T, ALICE. (All-Literature Investigation of Cardiovascular Evidence) group. negative association of diabetes with rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Diab Vasc Dis Res. (2016) 13:341–7. doi: 10.1177/1479164116651389

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Theivacumar NS, Stephenson MA, Mistry H, Valenti D. Diabetes mellitus and aortic aneurysm rupture: a favorable association? Vasc Endovascular Surg. (2014) 48:45–50. doi: 10.1177/1538574413505921

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Dua MM, Miyama N, Azuma J, Schultz GM, Sho M, Morser J, et al. Hyperglycemia modulates plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression and aortic diameter in experimental aortic aneurysm disease. Surgery. (2010) 148:429–35. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.05.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Thompson A, Cooper JA, Fabricius M, Humphries SE, Ashton HA, Hafez H. An analysis of drug modulation of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth through 25 years of surveillance. J Vasc Surg. (2010) 52:55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.02.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Vasamsetti SB, Karnewar S, Kanugula AK, Thatipalli AR, Kumar JM, Kotamraju S. Metformin inhibits monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation via AMPK-mediated inhibition of STAT3 activation: potential role in atherosclerosis. Diabetes. (2015) 64:2028–41. doi: 10.2337/db14-1225

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Li L, Mamputu JC, Wiernsperger N, Renier G. Signaling pathways involved in human vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression induced by leptin: inhibitory effect of metformin. Diabetes. (2005) 54:2227–34. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.7.2227

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Kim SA, Choi HC. Metformin inhibits inflammatory response via AMPK-PTEN pathway in vascular smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2012) 425:866–72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.07.165

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Isoda K, Young JL, Zirlik A, MacFarlane LA, Tsuboi N, Gerdes N, et al. Metformin inhibits proinflammatory responses and nuclear factor-kappaB in human vascular wall cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2006) 26:611–7. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000201938.78044.75

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. (2009) 62:1006–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD. Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA. (2018) 319:388–96. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19163

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Wells G, Shea B, O'Connell D, Robertson J, Peterson J, Welch V, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses[J]. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, (2011) 2:1–12.

Google Scholar

20. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp Clin Trials. (2015) 45:139–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Cordero CP, Dans AL. Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: detecting and dealing with heterogeneity in meta-analyses. J Clin Epidemiol. (2021) 130:149–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Kriston L. Dealing with clinical heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Assumptions, Methods, Interpretation Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. (2013) 22:1–15. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1377

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Fujimura N, Xiong J, Kettler EB, Xuan H, Glover KJ, Mell MW, et al. Metformin treatment status and abdominal aortic aneurysm disease progression. J Vasc Surg. (2016) 64:46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.02.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Golledge J, Moxon J, Pinchbeck J, Anderson G, Rowbotham S, Jenkins J, et al. Association between metformin prescription and growth rates of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg. (2017) 104:1486–93. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10587

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Itoga NK, Rothenberg KA, Suarez P, Ho TV, Mell MW, Xu B, et al. Metformin prescription status and abdominal aortic aneurysm disease progression in the US. J Vasc Surg. (2019) 69:710–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.194

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Golledge J, Morris DR, Pinchbeck J, Rowbotham S, Jenkins J, Bourke M, et al. Metformin prescription is associated with a reduction in the combined incidence of surgical repair and rupture related mortality in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. (2019) 57:94–101. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.07.035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Unosson J, Wågsäter D, Bjarnegård N, De Basso R, Welander M, Mani K, et al. Metformin prescription associated with reduced abdominal aortic aneurysm growth rate and reduced chemokine expression in a Swedish cohort. Ann Vasc Surg. (2021) 70:425–33. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.06.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Sutton SS, Magagnoli J, Cummings TH, Hardin JW. Association between metformin and abdominal aortic aneurysm in diabetic and non-diabetic US veterans. J Investig Med. (2020) 68:1015–8. doi: 10.1136/jim-2019-001177

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Turowicz A, Kobecki J, Laskowska A, Wojciechowski J, Swiatkowski F, Chabowski M. Association of metformin and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair outcomes. Ann Vasc Surg. (2021) 75:390–6. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.02.048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Room R. Dealing with publication bias: two possible steps forward. Drug Alcohol Rev. (2008) 27:343–4. doi: 10.1080/09595230802090063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Jackson D. The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameter. Stat Med. (2006) 25:2911–21. doi: 10.1002/sim.2293

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Lederle FA. The strange relationship between diabetes and abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. (2012) 43:254–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.12.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. De Rango P, Farchioni L, Fiorucci B, Lenti M. Diabetes and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. (2014) 47:243–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.12.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Sweeting MJ, Thompson SG, Brown LC, Powell JT, RESCAN. collaborators. meta-analysis of individual patient data to examine factors affecting growth and rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms Br J Surg. (2012) 99:655–65. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8707

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Kristensen KL, Dahl M, Rasmussen LM, Lindholt JS. Glycated hemoglobin is associated with the growth rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a substudy from the VIVA (Viborg Vascular) randomized screening trial. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2017) 37:730–6. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.308874

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Dattani N, Sayers RD, Bown MJ. Diabetes mellitus and abdominal aortic aneurysms: a review of the mechanisms underlying the negative relationship. Diab Vasc Dis Res. (2018) 15:367–74. doi: 10.1177/1479164118780799

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Morris D R, Sherliker P, Clack R, Lam H, Carter J, Halliday A, et al. The association of blood glucose and diabetes with peripheral arterial disease involving different vascular territories: results from 628 246 people who attended vascular screening. Eur Heart J. (2017) 38:654–654.

Google Scholar

38. Diaz-Morales N, Rovira-Llopis S, Bañuls C, Lopez-Domenech S, Escribano-Lopez I, Veses S, et al. Does metformin protect diabetic patients from oxidative stress and leukocyte-endothelium interactions? Antioxid Redox Signal. (2017) 27:1439–45. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Yang L, Shen L, Gao P, Li G, He Y, Wang M, et al. Effect of AMPK signal pathway on pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Oncotarget. (2017) 8:92827–40. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21608

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Hsu CY, Su YW, Chen YT, Tsai SH, Chang CC, Li SY, et al. Association between use of oral-antidiabetic drugs and the risk of aortic aneurysm: a nested case-control analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2016) 15:125. doi: 10.1186/s12933-016-0447-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Kristensen KL, Pottegård A, Hallas J, Rasmussen LM, Lindholt JS. Metformin treatment does not affect the risk of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. (2017) 66:768–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Yu X, Jiang D, Wang J, Wang R, Chen T, Wang K, et al. Metformin prescription and aortic aneurysm: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. (2019) 105:1351–7. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314639

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Yuan Z, Heng Z, Lu Y, Wei J, Cai Z. The protective effect of metformin on abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2021) 12:721213. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.721213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Shantikumar S, Ajjan R, Porter KE, Scott DJ. Diabetes and the abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. (2010) 39:200–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.10.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Golledge J, Norman PE. Atherosclerosis and abdominal aortic aneurysm: cause, response, or common risk factors? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2010) 30:1075–7. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.206573

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Sarajlić A, Gligorijević V, Radak D, PrŽulj N. Network wiring of pleiotropic kinases yields insight into protective role of diabetes on aneurysm. Integr Biol (Camb). (2014) 6:1049–57. doi: 10.1039/c4ib00125g

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Chen Y, Li H, Ye Z, Găman MA, Tan SC, Zhu F. The effect of metformin on carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Eur J Pharmacol. (2020) 886:173458. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173458

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Eilenberg W, Stojkovic S, Piechota-Polanczyk A, Kaider A, Kozakowski N, Weninger WJ, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) is elevated in type 2 diabetics with carotid artery stenosis and reduced under metformin treatment. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2017) 16:98. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0579-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Huangfu N, Wang Y, Cheng J, Xu Z, Wang S. Metformin protects against oxidized low density lipoprotein-induced macrophage apoptosis and inhibits lipid uptake. Exp Ther Med. (2018) 15:2485–91. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.5704

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Pierotti MA, Berrino F, Gariboldi M, Melani C, Mogavero A, Negri T, et al. Targeting metabolism for cancer treatment and prevention: metformin, an old drug with multi-faceted effects. Oncogene. (2013) 32:1475–87. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.181

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Hinchliffe RJ. Metformin and abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. (2017) 54:679–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.08.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: metformin, abdominal aortic aneurysm, expansion, mortality, meta-analysis

Citation: Niu W, Shao J, Yu B, Liu G, Wang R, Dong H, Che H and Li L (2022) Association Between Metformin and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Meta-Analysis. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 9:908747. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.908747

Received: 31 March 2022; Accepted: 04 May 2022;
Published: 23 May 2022.

Edited by:

Zhenjie Liu, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China

Reviewed by:

Lei Peng, North Sichuan Medical College, China
Santosh Karnewar, University of Virginia, United States

Copyright © 2022 Niu, Shao, Yu, Liu, Wang, Dong, Che and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Haijie Che, Y2hqMTQzNyYjeDAwMDQwOzE2My5jb20=; Lubin Li, bHViaW5odWFuZ2hlJiN4MDAwNDA7MTYzLmNvbQ==

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.