Post-angiography Retention of the Contrast Agent in the Left Atrial Appendage Is Associated With Risk of Cardioembolic Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Study

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents an important risk factor for cardioembolic stroke, and most atrial thrombi originate from the left atrial appendage (LAA). Although the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is widely used to estimate the risk of cardioembolic stroke in AF patients, yet greatly affected by many factors. This study was undertaken to determine the association between contrast agent retention in LAA after LAA angiography and risks of cardioembolic stroke in patients with AF.

Methods: This is a retrospective study. The demographic and clinical data of AF patients undergone left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with or without catheter radiofrequency ablation were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were classified into either stroke or non-stroke group by the history with cardioembolic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA).

Results: Sixty-two consecutive patients undergone LAAO were finally included, in whom 31 AF patients had a history of cardioembolic stroke or TIA (one TIA), and significantly higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc score (4.2 ± 1.4 vs. 3.3 ± 1.3; P = 0.006) as well as incidence of contrast agent retention in LAA (n = 20 vs. n = 7; P = 0.001) compared to the patients in non-stroke group. In addition, the relative proportion of distinctive morphological types of LAA was significantly different between groups (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores (OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.0–3.0, P = 0.046) and LAA contrast agent retention (OR = 5.1, 95% CI: 1.1–23.9, P = 0.002) were associated with increased risks of cardioembolic stroke. The patients with Windsock type LAA (OR = 7.8, 95% CI: 1.1–57.2, P = 0.044) and Cauliflower LAA (OR = 20.2, 95% CI: 3.2–125.5, P = 0.001) were more prone to cardioembolic stroke compared to those with Chicken Wing type LAA.

Conclusion: Left atrial appendage contrast agent retention after LAA angiography is associated with the risks of cardioembolic stroke in patients with AF, and cardioembolic stroke is more seen in AF patients with Windsock or Cauliflower type LAA.

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents a supraventricular arrhythmia, and commonly occurs in the aged population. This condition often progresses to impaired atrial contraction, reduced atrial emptying that can lead to blood stasis, thrombogenesis, and thromboembolism. Previous studies have shown that most atrial thrombi can arise from the left atrial appendage (LAA) (1–3). Also, AF can increase potential cardioembolic stroke by five-folds (4), and AF-related cardioembolic stroke is more fatal compared to the non-cardioembolic counterparts (5). Currently, CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is widely recommended to estimating the incidence of ischemic stroke in AF patients. According to the international guidelines, anticoagulation therapy should be considered for men with scores >1 and women with scores over 2 (6, 7). However, the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score appears incompetent to translate other risk factors responsible for stroke, such as left atrial diameter, alcohol abuse, chronic kidney disease (CKD), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), duration of AF episodes, etc. Some investigations have confirmed that the morphology, volume and flow velocity of LAA are also associated with the risks of cardioembolic stroke in patients with AF (8–16). In other words, no definite consensus is reached at present for evaluating the risk of cardioembolic stroke in patients with AF.

Several clinical studies have shown that conventional anticoagulants such as warfarin or new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) can lower the risk of ischemic stroke in AF patients (17, 18). However, nearly 40% of the AF patients at risk of developing cardioembolic stroke do not receive anticoagulation therapy due to the concern of risk of internal bleeding, physician's decision, or other considerations (19), for which the differences are clear among countries in the proportion of patients with AF received anticoagulant therapy. Lip et al. reported that in Europe 80.5% AF patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥1 received anticoagulant therapy (20), yet Xiang et al. reported that only 29.1% hospitalized AF patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥1 underwent anticoagulant therapy in China (21). The proportion of outpatient patients with AF treated with anticoagulant therapy may be lower, so the incidence of ischemic stroke in China remains high. Although the proportion of patients receiving anticoagulant therapy tends to grow in recent years, a considerable number of patients with AF failed to receive anticoagulant medication. For these patients, left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a potential alternative to prevent ischemic stroke. In our clinical practice, we have observed that the contrast agent was retained after LAA angiography in the LAAO procedures in some patients. Nevertheless, few studies so far are available to demonstrate the correlation between contrast agent retention and the risk of cardioembolic stroke in patients with AF. The aim of this study therefore was to determine whether the retention of contrast agent after LAA angiography has an association with the risk of cardioembolic stroke in the AF patients.

Methods

Study Design

This is a retrospective study performed in single center. The clinical and demographic data were obtained from 65 AF patients undergone LAAO with or without radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College between August 1, 2019 and June 30, 2021. The 65 patients were the first to undergo LAAO in our center. The demographic data included age, gender, history of smoking, and alcoholism, and clinical data consisted of diameter of left atrium (LA), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), AF type (persistent or paroxysmal), AF duration, antithrombotic therapy, history of cardioembolic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), pre-and post-stroke CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), body mass index (BMI), OSA, and intra-procedural images of LAA angiography. Patients with incomplete medical records were excluded. The study was approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College. Informed consent was obtained from each patient. Left atrial appendage occlusion is currently recommended as an alternative to anticoagulant therapy in patients with AF because of anticoagulant contraindications (22, 23). In view of the higher incidence of cardioembolic stroke in China due to lower proportion of anticoagulant therapy in AF patients, thus we attempted to bend the recognized recommendations for indications of LAAO in order to include more AF patients. These indications were composed of: (1) incapable of long-term anticoagulation from cerebrovascular or gastrointestinal bleeding history, poor compliance, or increased bleeding tendency; (2) history of cardioembolic stroke/TIA; (3) CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores ≥5; and (4) non-compliance with oral anticoagulant medication and request for non-pharmacological treatment. The exclusion criteria for LAAO in current study complied with the clinical study conducted in China (24), which included: atrial thrombus; LVEF <30%; symptomatic carotid disease; acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina; prior stroke or TIA within 30 days; acute infective endocarditis; pregnancy; prosthetic valve; atrial septal repair or closure history. The inclusion was illustrated in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Flow chart of patient selection.

Diagnosis of Cardioembolic Stroke/TIA

All patients with a history of cardioembolic stroke/TIA in this retrospective study were diagnosed by experienced neurologists in our hospital. The diagnosis of cardioembolic stroke/TIA complied with the criteria of Modified TOAST classification of subtypes of ischemic stroke (25) (Supplementary Table 1). Patients with any of the following conditions, including cardioembolic stroke such as recent myocardial infarction, patent foramen ovale, valvular artificial prosthesis, and infective endocarditis, were ruled out (26).

Antithrombotic Treatment for the Patients

All participants were treated with anticoagulant regimen for at least 1 month before LAAO procedure with or without RFCA, and combined anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy, if which was required for other conditions. Heparin was administered intravenously to achieve an activated clotting time between 250 and 300 s during the procedure. Aspirin combined with clopidogrel antiplatelet was applied to each patient for 6 months after LAAO procedure, followed by single aspirin regimen. In this study, the pre-procedural, intra-procedural, and post-procedural antithrombotic treatments followed the protocols described in two prospective clinical studies on percutaneous LAmbre device implantation (27, 28).

LAA Angiography

Atrial fibrillation was initially ablated in the event that a patient was to be treated with LAAO plus AF ablation. External electrical cardioversion of AF was executed in the patients with failed restoration of the sinus rhythm upon completion of AF ablation. Left atrial appendage occlusion was performed using LAmbre device (Lifetech Scientific Co., Shenzhen, China) after puncturing the atrial septum. A pig tail tube was delivered to the LAA through LAmbre occluding sheath guided by X-ray fluoroscopy. The contrast agent was then injected into the LAA at RAO 30°/CUAD 20° through the tube and LAmbre occluding sheath, and the images were simultaneously taken. The orifice size and the lobe of LAA were measured. In addition, the LAA was classified into the Chicken Wing, Windsock, Cactus, and Cauliflower morphological types as shown in Figure 2 by Wang et al. (29), based on which LAA angiography was implemented in our study. The morphology of the LAA was independently determined by two specialists. Incidence of contrast agent retention after LAA angiography was maintained in all patients. In current work, contrast agent retention in the LAA was defined as the presence of the dye within 10 cardiac cycles following LAA angiography.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Morphological types of LAA. Chicken Wing (A,B), Windsock (C,D), cauliflower (E), and cactus (F).

Statistics

All statistical analyses were performed using softward SPSS version 22.0 (Inc. Chicago, IL). Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD for normally distributed data, and compared using two-sample t-test or paired t-test. Categorical variables were presented as numbers or percentages and compared using the χ²-test or Fisher's exact test. Multivariate logistical regression analysis was done to identify risk factors for cardioembolic stroke and the odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 65 consecutive patients underwent LAAO with or without RFCA at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College during August 1, 2019 and June 30, 2021. Three patients with incomplete medical records were excluded. Finally, 62 consecutive patients were included in current investigation, of whom 30 had a history of cardioembolic stroke and one had TIA 1 month prior to admission. All patients received at least 1 month of anticoagulant therapy before LAAO intervention. No patients in the stroke group received antiplatelet therapy, and only one patient in non-stroke group underwent monotherapy with antiplatelet agent plus anticoagulant attributable to the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure within 6 months. Fourteen patients in the stroke group and 16 in the non-Stroke group, respectively, underwent both ablation of AF and LAAO. Although patients in the stroke group had significantly higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores compared to those in the non-stroke group (4.2 ± 1.4 vs. 3.3 ± 1.3; P = 0.006), the former had lower pre-stroke scores (2.2 ± 1.4 vs. 3.3 ± 1.3; P = 0.005). No significant differences were observed regarding remaining baseline characteristics (P > 0.05). The demographic and clinical characteristics of all patients were summarized in Table 1. Left atrial appendage angiography showed that the type of Cauliflower morphology was most common (n = 20, 64%) in the stroke group, whereas the Chicken Wing type was more seen in the non-stroke group (n = 19, 61%). The relative proportions of the different LAA morphological types were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the proportion of stroke patients with contrast agent retention was significantly higher than that of those in the non-stroke group (64 vs. 23%, P < 0.001). Fifteen patients in the non-stroke group, and 17 in the stroke group, respectively, had ongoing AF upon our observation of contrast retention. Left atrial appendage angiography findings were summarized in Table 2, and some of the imaging manifestation were shown in Figure 3.

TABLE 1

Table 1. The demographic and clinical characteristics for all participants.

TABLE 2

Table 2. LAA angiography data.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Illustration of LAA angiography image and contrast agent retention. Chicken Wing type LAA and contrast agent retention (A), Cauliflower type LAA and contrast agent retention (B–D), the arrows indicate contrast agent retention. LAA, left atrial appendage.

The univariate analysis found that morphology of LAA, CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, and LAA contrast agent retention were statistically significant between the two groups, therefore the three variables were included in the multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc score (OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.0–3.0, P = 0.046) and LAA contrast agent retention (OR = 5.1, 95% CI: 1.1–23.9, P = 0.002) significantly increased the risk of cardioembolic stroke. The patients with Windsock type LAA (OR = 7.8, 95% CI: 1.1–57.2, P = 0.044) and Cauliflower type LAA (OR = 20.2, 95% CI: 3.2–125.5, P = 0.001) were more likely to develop cardioembolic stroke compared to those with Chicken Wing type LAA (Table 3).

TABLE 3

Table 3. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of factors associated with cardioembolic stroke.

Discussion

Atrial fibrillation is the most common supraventricular arrhythmia, affecting an estimated 33.5 million victims worldwide (30). This condition can result in impaired atrial contraction, reduced atrial emptying, blood stasis, thrombogenesis, and cardioembolic stroke. The LAA is a finger-like projection extending from the LA, and regulating atrial pressure and endocrine function (31). Given the unique shape, LAA is the source of thromboembolism in more than 90% of the patients with non-valvular AF presenting with cardioembolic stroke (32). Stroke is currently ranked the fifth leading cause of death in the United States (33), and AF increases the risks of stroke by five-folds. Furthermore, cardioembolic stroke is more fatal than non-cardioembolic stroke (5). Patients with AF often exhibit atrial fibrosis, atrial dilatation, myofibrillar, and endothelial dysfunction (34, 35), as well as hemodynamic changes that result in thrombosis and increase the risk of stroke. Consequently, the pathophysiological changes aforementioned may lead to LAA thrombosis, even in the absence of AF (36, 37). CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is widely used to estimate the risk of cardioembolic stroke in AF patients. In our observations, we found that patients in stroke group had significantly higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores, whereas the pre-stroke scores were lower in this group compared to the non-stroke counterparts. One possible reason is that the majority of the patients included in current study without a history of cardioembolic stroke, though having relatively higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores, yet they were not tolerated to long-term anticoagulant administration, thus LAAO should be considered as an option in clinical practice. Another possibility is that some patients in the stroke group did not have high pre-stroke score despite being at a higher risk. Accordingly, the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is incompetent in some cases for accurately identifying AF patients at a high risk of cardioembolic stroke.

The proportion of patients with contrast agent retention in LAA was significantly greater in the stroke vs. non-stroke group, and multivariable logistic regression analysis further showed that both CHA₂DS₂-VASc score and LAA contrast agent retention were associated with a high risk of cardioembolic stroke. Retention of the contrast agent after LAA angiography means that the patients' blood is also prone to stasis in the LAA, which creates a condition for LAA thrombosis. Interestingly, the relative proportion of the different morphological types of LAA were significantly different between groups. While Chicken Wing type seemed predominant in patients in the non-stroke group, yet Cauliflower type was more common in those in the stroke group. This is just consistent with the findings reported by Adukauskaite et al. that significant correlation exists between WindSock or Cauliflower LAA type and risks of cardioembolic stroke in AF patients (38). In addition, there is evidence demonstrating that the LA wall thickness is a risk factor for cardioembolic and cryptogenic stroke (39). Lee et al. found that the Chicken Wing LAA was related to a lower incidence of cardioembolic stroke, which can be attributed to the small size of this morphological type that is capable of enhancing the velocity of blood flow (40). In this study we also found that the patients with Windsock or Cauliflower type LAA were more inclined to having cardioembolic stroke compared to those with Chicken Wing type LAA.

To summarize, contrast agent retention after LAA angiography is strongly associated with the risks of cardioembolic stroke development in patients with AF. Therefore, routine LAA angiography is recommended for individual patient undergoing AF ablation in order to supplement the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score for risk stratification of cardioembolic stroke. Besides, LAA angiography can be used to identify AF patients at a high risk of cardioembolic stroke even if in patients with lower CHA₂DS₂-VASc score.

Limitations

Some limitations in current study consist of: (1) retrospective observation in single center with limited samples, which needs further verification on a larger, multi-center cohort; (2) hard ensuring the final diagnosis of cardioembolic stroke because this condition can arise from diverse sources, consequently misdiagnosis of cardioembolic stroke/TIA in AF patients might be inevitable, even in the hands of experienced neurologists; and (3) potentially biased LAA morphology definition because of it being subjectively interpreted via angiography instead of digitized modeling by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Conclusions

Post-angiography retention of the contrast agent in the LAA has an association with the risk of cardioembolic stroke in patients with AF. Atrial fibrillation patients with Windsock or Cauliflower type LAA are prone to developing cardioembolic stroke. Left atrial appendage angiography can be used to identify the degree of risks for AF patients with cardioembolic stroke regardless of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. For patients with LAA contrast retention following LAA angiography, LAAO or long-term anticoagulant therapy should be maintained even if the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score remains lower.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

PF: drafted the manuscript. PF, YW, JW, XW, and HY: performed the procedures and collected the data. HY and PF: designed this research and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.753949/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Savelieva I, Bajpai A, Camm AJ. Stroke in atrial fibrillation: update on pathophysiology, new antithrombotic therapies, and evolution of procedures and devices. Ann Med. (2007) 39:371–91. doi: 10.1080/07853890701320662

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Scherr D, Dalal D, Chilukuri K, Dong J, Spragg D, Henrikson CA, et al. Incidence and predictors of left atrial thrombus prior to catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electr. (2009) 20:379–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01336.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Puwanant S, Varr BC, Shrestha K, Hussain SK, Tang WHW, Gabriel RS, et al. Role of the CHADS2 score in the evaluation of thromboembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing transesophageal echocardiography before pulmonary vein isolation. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2009) 54:2032–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham study. Stroke. (1991) 22:983–8. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.22.8.983

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Tu HTH, Campbell BCV, Christensen S, Collins M, De Silva DA, Butcher KS, et al. Pathophysiological determinants of worse stroke outcome in atrial fibrillation. Cerebrovasc Dis. (2010) 30:389–95. doi: 10.1159/000316886

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. (2016) 37:2893–962. doi: 10.5603/KP.2016.0172

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

7. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2019) 74:104–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Kimura T, Takatsuki S, Inagawa K, Katsumata Y, Nishiyama T, Nishiyama N, et al. Anatomical characteristics of the left atrial appendage in cardiogenic stroke with low CHADS2 scores. Heart Rhythm. (2013) 10:921–5. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.01.036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Di Biase L, Santangeli P, Anselmino M, Mohanty P, Salvetti I, Gili S, et al. Does the left atrial appendage morphology correlate with the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation? J Am Coll Cardiol. (2012) 60:531–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Khurram IM, Dewire J, Mager M, Maqbool F, Zimmerman SL, Zipunnikov V, et al. Relationship between left atrial appendage morphology and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. (2013) 10:1843–9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.09.065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Beinart R, Heist EK, Newell JB, Holmvang G, Ruskin JN, Mansour M. Left atrial appendage dimensions predict the risk of stroke/TIA in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electr. (2011) 22:10–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01854.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Taina M, Vanninen R, Hedman M, Jakala P, Karkkainen S, Tapiola T, et al. Left atrial appendage volume increased in more than half of patients with cryptogenic stroke. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e79519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079519

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Burrell LD, Horne BD, Anderson JL, Muhlestein JB, Whisenant BK. Usefulness of left atrial appendage volume as a predictor of embolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. (2013) 112:1148–52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.062

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Takada T, Yasaka M, Nagatsuka K, Minematsu K, Yamaguchi T. Blood flow in the left atrial appendage and embolic stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Eur Neurol. (2001) 46:148–52. doi: 10.1159/000050788

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Shimizu T, Takada T, Shimode A, Fujita Y, Usuki N, Kato B, et al. Association between paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and the left atrial appendage ejection fraction during sinus rhythm in the acute stage of stroke: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2013) 22:1370–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.03.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Lee JM, Shim J, Uhm J, Kim YJ, Lee H, Pak H, et al. Impact of increased orifice size and decreased flow velocity of left atrial appendage on stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. (2014) 113:963–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.11.058

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. (2007) 146:857–67. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-12-200706190-00007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, Hoffman EB, Deenadayalu N, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. (2014) 383:955–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62343-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Kakkar AK, Mueller I, Bassand JP, Fitzmaurice DA, Goldhaber SZ, Goto S, et al. Risk profiles and antithrombotic treatment of patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke: perspectives from the international, observational, prospective GARFIELD registry. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e63479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063479

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Lip GY, Laroche C, Dan GA, Santini M, Kalarus Z, Rasmussen LH, et al. 'Real-world' antithrombotic treatment in atrial fibrillation: the EORP-AF pilot survey. Am J Med. (2014) 127:519–29. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.12.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Xiang W, Zhang J, Liu M, Liu F, Feng X, Wang Y. Antithrombotic therapy in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a pilot study. Clin Interv Aging. (2015) 10:515–9. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S67974

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Glikson M, Wolff R, Hindricks G, Mandrola J, Camm AJ, Lip GYH, et al. EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion – an update. EuroIntervention. (2020) 15:1133–80. doi: 10.4244/EIJY19M08_01

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Holmes DJ, Kar S, Price MJ, Whisenant B, Sievert H, Doshi SK, et al. Prospective randomized evaluation of the watchman left atrial appendage closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2014) 64:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Huang H, Liu Y, Xu Y, Wang Z, Li Y, Cao K, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with the LAmbre device for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a prospective, multicenter clinical study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. (2017) 10:2188–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.072

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Fure B, Wyller TB, Thommessen B. TOAST criteria applied in acute ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. (2005) 112:254–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00470.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Kamel H, Healey JS. Cardioembolic stroke. Circ Res. (2017) 120:514–26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308407

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Chen S, Schmidt B, Bordignon S, Bologna F, Nagase T, Tsianakas N, et al. Feasibility of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using a novel LAmbre occluder in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial results from a prospective cohort registry study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. (2018) 29:291–7. doi: 10.1111/jce.13385

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Park J, Sievert H, Kleinecke C, Vaskelyte L, Schnupp S, Sievert K, et al. Left atrial appendage occlusion with LAmbre in atrial fibrillation: initial European experience. Int J Cardiol. (2018) 265:97–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.02.120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Wang Y, Di Biase L, Horton RP, Nguyen T, Morhanty P, Natale A. Left atrial appendage studied by computed tomography to help planning for appendage closure device placement. J Cardiovasc Electr. (2010) 21:973–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01814.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a global burden of disease 2010 study. Circulation (New York, NY). (2014) 129:837–47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Beigel RM, Wunderlich NCM, Ho SYM, Arsanjani RM, Siegel RJM. The left atrial appendage: anatomy, function, and noninvasive evaluation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2014) 7:1251–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.08.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Stoddard MF, Dawkins PR, Prince CR, Ammash NM. Left atrial appendage thrombus is not uncommon in patients with acute atrial fibrillation and a recent embolic event: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. (1995) 25:452–9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00396-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics−2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. (2017) 135:e146–603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000491

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Cai H, Li Z, Goette A, Mera F, Honeycutt C, Feterik K, et al. Downregulation of endocardial nitric oxide synthase expression and nitric oxide production in atrial fibrillation: potential mechanisms for atrial thrombosis and stroke. Circulation. (2002) 106:2854–8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000039327.11661.16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Mihm MJ, Yu F, Carnes CA, Reiser PJ, McCarthy PM, Van Wagoner DR, et al. Impaired myofibrillar energetics and oxidative injury during human atrial fibrillation. Circulation (New York, NY). (2001) 104:174–80. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.104.2.174

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Kamel H, Soliman EZ, Heckbert SR, Kronmal RA, Longstreth WT, Nazarian S, et al. P-wave morphology and the risk of incident ischemic stroke in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Stroke. (2014) 45:2786–8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006364

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Yaghi S, Boehme AK, Hazan R, Hod EA, Canaan A, Andrews HF, et al. Atrial cardiopathy and cryptogenic stroke: a cross-sectional pilot study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2016) 25:110–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Adukauskaite A, Barbieri F, Senoner T, Plank F, Knoflach M, Boehme C, et al. Left atrial appendage morphology and left atrial wall thickness are associated with cardio-embolic stroke. J Clin Med. (2020) 9:3944. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123944

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Adukauskaite A, Barbieri F, Senoner T, Plank F, Beyer C, Knoflach M, et al. Left atrial appendage morphology is associated with cryptogenic stroke: a CTA study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2019) 12:2079–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.04.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Lee JM, Seo J, Uhm J, Kim YJ, Lee H, Kim J, et al. Why is left atrial appendage morphology related to strokes? An analysis of the flow velocity and orifice size of the left atrial appendage. J Cardiovasc Electr. (2015) 26:922–7. doi: 10.1111/jce.12710

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar