Single nucleotide variants in the CCL2, OAS1 and DPP9 genes and their association with the severity of COVID-19 in an Ecuadorian population

COVID-19 has a broad clinical spectrum, ranging from asymptomatic-mild form to severe phenotype. The severity of COVID-19 is a complex trait influenced by various genetic and environmental factors. Ethnic differences have been observed in relation to COVID-19 severity during the pandemic. It is currently unknown whether genetic variations may contribute to the increased risk of severity observed in Latin-American individuals The aim of this study is to investigate the potential correlation between gene variants at CCL2, OAS1, and DPP9 genes and the severity of COVID-19 in a population from Quito, Ecuador. This observational case-control study was conducted at the Carrera de Biologia from the Universidad Central del Ecuador and the Hospital Quito Sur of the Instituto Ecuatoriano de Seguridad Social (Quito-SUR-IESS), Quito, Ecuador. Genotyping for gene variants at rs1024611 (A>G), rs10774671 (A>G), and rs10406145 (G>C) of CCL2, OAS1, and DPP9 genes was performed on 100 COVID-19 patients (43 with severe form and 57 asymptomatic-mild) using RFLP-PCR. The genotype distribution of all SNVs throughout the entire sample of 100 individuals showed Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (P=0.53, 0.35, and 0.4 for CCL2, OAS1, and DPP9, respectively). The HWE test did not find any statistically significant difference in genotype distribution between the study and control groups for any of the three SNVs. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that individuals with the GG of the CCL2 rs1024611 gene variant had an increased association with the severe COVID-19 phenotype in a recessive model (P = 0.0003, OR = 6.43, 95% CI 2.19-18.89) and for the OAS1 rs10774671 gene variant, the log-additive model showed a significant association with the severe phenotype of COVID-19 (P=0.0084, OR=3.85, 95% CI 1.33-11.12). Analysis of haplotype frequencies revealed that the coexistence of GAG at CCL2, OAS1, and DPP9 variants, respectively, in the same individual increased the presence of the severe COVID-19 phenotype (OR=2.273, 95% CI: 1.271-4.068, P=0.005305). The findings of the current study suggests that the ethnic background affects the allele and genotype frequencies of genes associated with the severity of COVID-19. The experience with COVID-19 has provided an opportunity to identify an ethnicity-based approach to recognize genetically high-risk individuals in different populations for emerging diseases.

1 Introduction

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the pathogen responsible for the extremely contagious infection known as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The virus has spread around the world since it first appeared in Wuhan, China, in late 2019 and reached Ecuador in February 2020 (Guevara et al., 2022). One of the countries with the most severe impact worldwide has been Ecuador. According to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard (https://covid19.who.int/) by the World Health Organization (WHO), as of March 2023, the pandemic had accumulated more than one million confirmed cases in Ecuador, including over 36,000 deaths (WHO, 2023) with a cumulative mortality rate of 204.9 per 100,000 inhabitants (Observatorio Social del Ecuador, 2024 https://www.covid19ecuador.org/fallecidos). The COVID-19 pandemic has had profound effects on Ecuador’s health systems as well as its social, economic, and political areas. As humanity emerges from the pandemic, public health research continues to focus on understanding COVID-19 and protecting populations from its future impacts.

SARS-CoV-2 infection causes a broad clinical spectrum, ranging from asymptomatic-mild form to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation and potentially leading to death (Wang et al., 2020; Pairo-Castineira et al., 2021). Furthermore, there is evidence of individual differences in susceptibility to COVID-19 (Wang et al., 2020; Fricke-Galindo and Falfán-Valencia, 2021). Host-associated variables, such as advanced age, male sex, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus, have been shown to significantly influence the susceptibility and severity of COVID-19 (Biswas et al., 2021; Bollyky et al., 2022). However, these risk variables are insufficient to explain fully the great phenotypic variability of COVID-19. The COVID-19 phenotype (susceptibility to infection and/or disease severity) is believed to be a complex trait influenced by various genetic and environmental factors. Due to the unpredictable nature of the COVID-19 course, significant efforts have been made to identify reliable prognostic factors. However, the predictive capacity of such biomarkers to detect individuals at risk of developing the severe form of COVID-19 in different ethnic populations is limited. In addition, ethnic differences have been described in relation to age-standardized diagnosis rates, hospitalizations, and mortality during the pandemic (Tai et al., 2022). A complex genetic predisposition may contribute to adverse COVID-19 outcomes (Niemi et al., 2022). This is supported by findings such as family clustering of severe cases and severe disease presentation among young women with no comorbidities. It is unclear whether genetic variations contribute to the increased risk of susceptibility and severity observed in Latin-American individuals (Niedzwiedz et al., 2020). Other factors, such as high poverty levels, poor vaccination campaigns, larger multigenerational households, and a higher prevalence of comorbidities, may explain the higher rates of susceptibility and death due to SARS-CoV-2 infection in these populations (Mathur et al., 2021). Therefore, it is essential to have a more comprehensive understanding of the genetic factors that contribute to the risk of Latin-American populations. This knowledge will aid in population risk stratification and the implementation of preventive measures to protect the most vulnerable individuals.

The COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative (https://www.covid19hg.org/), is a global network dedicated to investigating the role of human genetics in SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity. Chromosomal regions associated with increased disease susceptibility (OAS1, OAS2, and OAS3 genes, a gene cluster that encodes antiviral restriction enzyme activators), pulmonary fibrosis and antigen presentation and antiviral signaling (DPP9 gene), association with innate immune response (IFNAR2) and activation to cytokine storm (TYK2) have been reported (Pairo-Castineira et al., 2021; Velavan et al., 2021). In a meta-analysis of 46 studies from 19 countries, totaling 49,562 cases and 2 million controls, researchers found a significant association at 3p21.31. Carriers of the C allele of SNV rs10490770 of LZTFL1 gene with an age <60 years had a significantly increased risk of progressing to death or severe respiratory failure (Genomewide Association Study of Severe Covid-19 with Respiratory Failure, 2020; Nakanishi et al., 2021). These genome-wide association studies (GWASs) are mainly conducted in developed countries with well-established health systems, better infrastructure, and qualified scientific staff. In addition, a difference in allele and genotype frequencies at SNV rs10490770 among ethnic groups was found, which correlated with susceptibility and severity for COVID-19 in individuals of South Asian ancestry (Downes et al., 2021). Variations in allele and genotype frequencies in other SNVs that confer risk for COVID-19 have also been described in populations of African descent (Barash et al., 2020). This supports the hypothesis that genetic differences could contribute to ethnic disparities in the observed COVID-19 phenotype. On the other hand, the creation of vaccines has been shown to be the most successful strategy for limiting the spread of COVID-19 (Chen et al., 2022; Nohynek and Wilder-Smith, 2022). Nevertheless, the efficacy and durability of vaccines have been questioned due to the emergence of new variants of concern (VOC) with different epidemiological and biological features (Cao et al., 2022; Chenchula et al., 2022). Therefore, obtaining more data on human genetic variants in Latin American populations is crucial due to high interbreeding. This will better prepare global health policymakers for future pandemics.

The CCL2 gene is part of a cluster of cytokine genes on the long arm of chromosome 17. This gene encodes a protein that acts as a ligand for the C-C chemokine receptors CCR2 and CCR4 and induces a strong chemotactic response. Chemokines are a superfamily of secreted proteins that play a role in immunoregulatory and inflammatory processes. Neural tube defects and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 are among the diseases associated with the CCL2 gene. The cytokine CCL2 is chemotactic for monocytes and basophils, but not for neutrophils or eosinophils. The migration of monocytes and macrophages to sites of infection and inflammation is strongly supported by CCL2. Its function in the early immune response is essential for the initiation of a successful antiviral defense (Conrady et al., 2013). SARS-CoV-2 is associated with increased expression of the encoded protein (Bagheri-Hosseinabadi et al., 2024). The SNV rs1024611 of the CCL2 gene was significantly associated with COVID-19 severity (including the 1000 Genomes Project, P = 0.001) (Rüter et al., 2022). On the other hand, the OAS1 gene is located at 12q24.13, a chromosomal region previously associated with the severe form of COVID-19 in genome-wide association studies (Pairo-Castineira et al., 2021). The OAS1 gene encodes the enzyme 2′-5′ oligoadenylate synthetase 1 (2-5A), an activator of ribonuclease L (RNaseL), that degrades viral RNA in the host cell, blocks viral replication and inhibits viral protein synthesis. The SNV rs10774671 of the OAS1 gene is a G→A transition in the last nucleotide of intron 5 of the OAS1 gene, which affects the nonsense-mediated decay and the splicing site and controls the differential expression of isoforms with lower enzymatic activity (Bonnevie-Nielsen et al., 2005; Kjær et al., 2014). Immunodeficiency 100 with Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis and Hypogammaglobulinemia and Infantile-Onset Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis-Hypogammaglobulinemia are two diseases associated with the OAS1 gene. In addition, SNVs in this gene have been associated with susceptibility to viral infections, including diabetes mellitus type 1 and SARS-CoV-2. Similarly, the DDP9 gene is located on chromosomal region 19p13.1. This region was also found to be associated with disease severity in COVID-19 (Pairo-Castineira et al., 2021; Pathak et al., 2021). This gene encodes a serine protease, with post-proline dipeptidyl aminopeptidase activity that cleaves off N-terminal dipeptides from proteins having a Pro or Ala residue at position 2. DDP9 functions as a key inhibitor of caspase-1-dependent monocyte and macrophage pyroptosis in quiescent cells by delaying activation of NLRP1 and CARD8, which form the active part of the inflammasomes (Hollingsworth et al., 2021). DPP9-related diseases include Hatipoglu Immunodeficiency Syndrome and Interstitial Lung Disease 2. Associated pathways include pulmonary fibrosis. Suppression of pyroptosis and inflammasome activation play is now known to play a key role in breaking the cycle of viral replication and preventing amplification of SARS-CoV-2 (Sefik et al., 2022). DDP9 also plays an important role in mediating lung damage in cases of severe COVID-19 (Wang et al., 2021). Two intronic polymorphisms in the DPP9 gene have been associated with the severe form of COVID-19 and worse clinical outcome in infected individuals (Pairo-Castineira et al., 2021; Horowitz et al., 2022).

Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the potential association between genic variants at rs1024611 (A>G), rs10774671 (A>G), and rs10406145 (G>C) of CCL2, OAS1, and DPP9 genes, respectively, and the severity of COVID-19 in a population from Quito, Ecuador.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Design and study subjects

This observational case-control study was conducted at the Carrera de Biologia from the Universidad Central del Ecuador and the Hospital Quito Sur of the Instituto Ecuatoriano de Seguridad Social (Quito-SUR-IESS), Quito, Ecuador. The hospital served as a referral center for COVID-19 in Quito, Ecuador. The study included 100 patients with COVID-19 who voluntarily participated. COVID-19 was diagnosed based on clinical and radiologic findings upon hospital admission. However, the study only included patients who were confirmed to have SARS-CoV-2 through the Reverse Transcription quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) test from nasal swabs at the time of hospitalization. The eligible patients were then divided into two groups: the Case group, which included patients with severe COVID-19 disease, and the Control group, which included patients with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 disease. All subjects were from the Andean (Sierra) region of Ecuador.

The study group comprised of 43 consecutively enrolled patients of both sexes who suffered from severe COVID-19 during the Omicron VOC-dominant wave from October 2021 to March 2022. Severe phenotype was defined as patients who had a) significant respiratory distress (respiratory rate >30/min); b) a chest computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrating a viral pneumonia pattern due to diffuse infiltration of both lungs greater than 50% (CORADS 6); c) the need for mechanical ventilation due to respiratory failure (PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 100mmHg (with PEEP ≥ 5cm H2O) and SpO2/FiO2 ratio <300); and d) the need for monitoring and treatment in an intensive care unit. It is important to note that all participants in the Case Group had received two doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

The study’s control group comprised 57 healthcare workers from the same hospital who cared for COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit during the first wave of the pandemic (March-May 2020). All subjects had the asymptomatic-mild phenotype, and none of the COVID-19 patients in the control group had been vaccinated or required mechanical ventilation during the study. Asymptomatic patients were defined as those who had a positive RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 with a close contact history but no clinical symptoms or signs during follow-up. Patients with a positive RT-qPCR test for COVID-19 were considered to have the mild form of the disease if they experienced the following symptoms: fever, headache, muscle/joint pain, fatigue, cough, and sore throat; respiratory rate <30/minute; SpO2 level above 93% in room air; and no evidence of pneumonia on lung CT. The individuals in the control group evolved satisfactorily without respiratory complications or the need for hospitalization. This method of subject selection was carried out to identify COVID-19-related alleles.

Exclusion criteria for both groups included consanguineous individuals, HIV-positive subjects, children, pregnant or lactating women, refugees or displaced persons, and persons with little or no knowledge of the Spanish language.

Participants were asked to provide demographic and anthropometric data, including age, sex, height, and weight, as well as clinical information such as previous comorbidities, medication intake, and hospitalization, including intensive care unit admission. Data from asymptomatic-mild COVID-19 patients (control group) was collected using a questionnaire application by qualified medical specialists. Comorbidities reported by participants were grouped together and their combined effect was weighted in the regression analysis.

2.2 Ethical considerations

The study was conducted in accordance with human rights and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, including subsequent revisions. The research protocol (MSP-CGDES-2020-0244-O1) was approved by the Comite de Etica para la Revisión Expedita de Investigaciones en COVID-19 of the Ministerio de Salud Publica of Ecuador in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, including healthy individuals, prior to their inclusion in the study. If participants were unable to sign due to their condition, we obtained consent from their legal representatives. Participants provided written consent for sample withdrawal, biological sample processing, and the use of medical records. The samples and data were collected by hospital staff members who had no interaction with the researchers conducting the molecular tests.

2.3 Molecular analysis

2.3.1 DNA extraction and quality

Ten milliliters of venous blood were collected from each participant using EDTA anticoagulant tubes. DNA was extracted using the Column-Pure Blood Genomic DNA (ABM, Vancouver, Canada) kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was quantified using the Qubit dsDNA BR ASSAY Kit (21000 ng 100RX) with the Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen, Massachusetts, USA). The quality of the DNA was assessed using the Microtek Bio-1000F program scanner (Microtek International Inc., Hsinchu City, Taiwan) after 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis at 80V for one hour. The isolated DNA was then diluted to a working concentration of 50 ng/μL before genotyping and stored at -20°C.

2.3.2 Genotyping of single-nucleotide variants of CCL2, OAS1 and DPP9 genes

The polymerase chain reaction-based restriction fragment length polymorphism method (PCR-RFLP) was used to analyze three polymorphic SNVs: CCL2 rs1024611, OAS1 rs10774671, and DPP9 rs10406145 (see Supplementary Table S1). The primer sequences, annealing temperature, restriction enzymes, and restriction digestion pattern are presented in Supplementary Table S2.

The PCR master mix and thermocycler settings (Applied Biosystems MiniAmp, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Massachusetts, USA) were performed according to previously published protocols (Qiu et al., 2008; Noguchi et al., 2013; Tu et al., 2015) with modifications. The components and concentrations of each PCR run are described in detail in Supplementary Table S3. The PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gels in the blueGelTM system (48V, 45 minutes) (MiniPCR Bio, Massachusetts, USA). The products were then digested with their respective restriction enzymes and electrophoresed in 3% agarose gels using Thermo ScientificTM equipment (120V, 2 hours) (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Massachusetts, USA).

PCR product sizes were used to determine the alleles and genotypes for each sample. The G allele is represented by two fragments of 91 plus 45 bp for the CCL2 rs1024611 variants, while the A allele is indicated by a band of 136 bp. A heterozygous individual (GA) is designated by the combination of both G and A bands, i.e., 136/91/45 bp (Tu et al., 2015). The OAS1 rs10774671 gene variant was analyzed by digesting the 306 bp PCR products with the restriction enzyme AluI. The presence of the A allele was indicated by two bands, 255 and 51 bp, while the G allele was represented by a single band of 306 bp. A heterozygous genotype (GA) was demonstrated using two segments of 306 and 255 bp (Noguchi et al., 2013). The PCR products for the DPP9 rs10406145 variant were analyzed, revealing segments of 139 and 114 bp that identified the G and C alleles, respectively. A heterozygous patient (GC) can be identified by the presence of two bands (139 and 144 bp) (Qiu et al., 2008). To ensure the reproducibility and quality of genotyping of PCR-RFLP, 10% of all samples were randomly sequenced, and the results showed complete matching.

2.4 Statistical analysis

The data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2019, GraphPad InStat 7.00 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA), SNPStats (https://www.snpstats.net; RRID : SCR_002142), the HardyWeinberg statistical package for R Studio (Graffelman, 2015), the TernaryPlot webpage (https://www.ternaryplot.com/) and SHEsis software (http://analysis.bio-x.cn/; RRID : SCR_002958). The general features of the participants are described as number (n) and proportions of cases and continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) under conditions of normal distribution and skewed data as median and rank. Age was presented as both a continuous and a categorical variable (<50 and ≥50 years). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to determine the probability distributions of variables. To compare the proportions of categorical variables, i.e., differences in the percentages of sex, obesity, comorbidities, and subjects between case and control groups, the two-proportion z-test was used. A Student t-test was performed to compare means between groups for continuous variables. The association between qualitative variables and COVID-19 phenotype was examined using Chi-square (χ²). Results as determined by 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and a P-value of <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. The analysis considered several independent variables, including age, sex, obesity, and comorbidities, as well as alleles and genotypes. These variables were exported to a multivariable logistic regression analysis, with the severe phenotype of COVID-19 serving as the dependent variable. The purpose was to assess the individual effect of each variable on the COVID-19 phenotype and control for possible confounders. The final multivariable model set a significance level of P < 0.05 for two-sided tests.

Allele and genotype frequencies were calculated by direct counting and expressed as proportions and percentages. Using the exact, χ², the likelihood ratio, and the permutation tests, allele and genotype frequencies were examined to determine whether the groups were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) (Graffelman and Weir, 2016). A De Finetti diagram was generated using the interface from TernaryPlot webpage (https://www.ternaryplot.com/) to represent HWE. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare allele and genotype frequencies between the case and control groups. The P-values were adjusted using the Bonferroni correction to determine the significance of multiple testing at each feature genetic model (P < 0.05/n, where n is the number of alleles or genotypes analyzed).

The odds ratios along with the corresponding 95% CI between the wild-type and the mutant alleles were tested for each SNV to examine the strength of associations between the different alleles and clinical phenotype of COVID-19. The association between SNVs and the existence of a severe phenotype in COVID-19 was then further examined in different genetic models (crude analysis). Adjusted odds ratios were used to assess the association between CCL2, OAS1, and DPP9 genotypes and the presence of severe COVID-19 phenotype, after controlling for age, sex, obesity, and comorbidities.

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) and haplotype blocks were analyzed among the three SNVs using SHEsis freeware (online version). The degree of LD was evaluated using the standardization coefficient (D′) and the correlation coefficient (r²). The stronger LD between two SNVs was defined as having values of D’ or r² that were closer to one.

3 Results

3.1 Demographic characteristics of participants

The clinical characteristics of the subjects in this study are described in Table 1. A total of 100 patients with COVID-19 with a mean ± SD of 49.47 ± 12.59 years old (median (P10, P90)/(min, max) of 49.21 (32.13, 67.38)/(25.25, 80.08) years old), including 63 males and 37 females, were enrolled from subjects admitted to Quito-SUR-IESS Hospital from Quito, Ecuador. Fifty-seven COVID-19 patients with an asymptomatic-mild phenotype from healthy staff served as the control group and 43 patients with severe COVID-19 served as the case group. Comorbidities were reported in 14 participants (study group (n=10) and control group (n=4)), including arterial hypertension (n=6), diabetes mellitus type I (n=1) and type 2 (n=4), rheumatoid arthritis (n=2), epilepsy (n=1); chronic renal insufficiency (n=1) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n=1). Four patients had more than one comorbidity. A male preponderance was observed in the case group (male vs female: 33 vs 10), whereas there was no sex difference in the male to female ratio in the control group (male to female: 30-to-27). As a result, a statistically significant sex difference was found between the case and control groups (P= 0.013). Patients with the severe phenotype of COVID-19 were also older (P= 0.0003) and more likely to be obese (P= 0.0030) than those with the asymptomatic-mild phenotype. Additionally, individuals in the case group were more likely to have comorbid conditions than individuals in the control group (P=0.0203).

Table 1

Table 1 Clinical features of participants.

3.2 Comparison of allele and genotype frequencies of SNVs in CCL2 rs1024611, OAS1 rs10774671 and DPP9 rs10406145 between case and control groups and Hardy-Weinberg test

The allele and genotype frequencies for each SNV in the CCL2, OAS1, and DPP9 genes are listed in Table 2. The results showed that the minor allele frequencies (MAFs) of the OAS1 rs10774671 and DPP9 rs10406145 gene variants were low, ranging from 0.16 to 0.19 in the case group and 0.12 to 0.21 in the control group, respectively. In comparison, the MAFs for the CCL2 rs1024611 gene variant were higher in the case and control groups (0.23 and 0.49, respectively). The allele frequencies of OAS1 and DPP9 showed no significant difference between the case and control groups (z-statistic and P-value: 0.428 and 0.669, and 0.804 and 0.421, respectively). The frequency of the CCL2 rs1024611-G allele was significantly higher in the case group (OR = 3.186, 95% CI 1.713 to 5.963, z-statistic: 3.66 and P=0.0003).

Table 2

Table 2 Allele and Genotype Frequencies and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in SNVs.

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was observed in the genotype distribution of all SNVs in the entire sample of 100 individuals (exact test; P=0.53, 0.35, and 0.4 for CCL2, OAS1, and DPP9, respectively) (Table 2, Supplementary Table S4, and Figure 1). In addition, the HWE test revealed no statistically significant difference in the genotype distribution between the study and control groups for any of the three SNVs.

Figure 1

Figure 1 De Finetti diagram each dot shows allele and genotype frequencies for the general group of the following markers: rs1024611 (A>G) for CCL2, rs10774671 (A>G) for OAS1, and rs10406145 (G>C) for DPP9. The parable in red shows the acceptance region for the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, markers that fall below the parable are said to be in HWE. AA= Homozygous for the major allele, AB= Heterozygous, BB=Homozygous for the minor allele.

3.3 Univariate analysis of the associations between the alleles and genotypes of three loci and the presence of the severe phenotype of COVID-19

For each of the three SNVs considered, we examined the odds ratios between the wild-type and the mutant alleles. The association between the SNVs and the presence of a severe phenotype in COVID-19 was then further investigated in different genetic models.

No allele or genotype of the OAS1 or DPP9 loci was significantly associated with the severe COVID-19 phenotype. However, in a recessive model, the GG genotype of the CCL2 rs1024611 gene variant showed a significant association with the severe clinical manifestation of COVID-19 (P<0.0001, OR = 5.71, 95% CI 2.38-13.70), while in an overdominant model, the AA genotype showed a protective effect against the severe clinical phenotype of (P=0.0044, OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.71).

3.4 Multivariable logistic regression analysis of the associations between the alleles and genotypes of three loci and the presence of the severe phenotype of COVID-19

The real association between the CCL2, OAS1, and DPP9 variants and the presence of the severe COVID-19 phenotype was examined using multivariable logistic regression analysis to control the influence of age, sex, obesity, and comorbidities. Similarly, none of the alleles or genotypes of the DPP9 gene variant were significantly associated with the severe phenotype of COVID-19 according to the results of the multivariable logistic regression analysis (Table 3). When the GG genotype of the CCL2 rs1024611 gene variant was examined among individuals with different clinical manifestations of COVID-19, its distribution was associated with an increased association with the severe COVID-19 phenotype in a recessive model (P = 0.0003, OR = 6.43, 95% CI 2.19-18.89). Similarly, the AG genotype showed a protective effect against the severe form of COVID-19 in an over dominant model (P=0.0029, OR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.07-0.62). For the OAS1 rs10774671 gene variant, the log-additive model showed a significant association with the severe phenotype of COVID-19 (P=0.0084, OR=3.85, 95% CI 1.33-11.12).

Table 3

Table 3 SNV associations with the severe form of COVID-19 (n=100, adjusted analysis by covariables).

3.5 Stratification analysis of the correlation between CCL2, OAS1, and DPP9 variants and COVID-19

Using age-based stratification analysis in adjusted genetic models, the interaction of CCL2, OAS1, and DPP9 SNVs with the presence of the severe COVID-19 phenotype was examined. No interaction between age and CCL2 rs1024611 and OAS1 rs1024611 variants was associated with severe COVID-19. In contrast, the CC genotype at DPP9 rs10406145 was associated with severe COVID-19 in individuals younger than 50 years in an adjusted dominant model (interaction P value=0.021, OR=7.67, 95% CI 2.75-21.42). On the other hand, a significant association between the GG genotype of the DPP9 rs10406145 gene variant and the severe form of COVID-19 was found in males in an adjusted recessive genetic model (OR = 4.47, 95% CI 1.04-19.21).

3.6 Analysis of CCL2, OAS1 and DPP9 SNV haplotypes and correlation with severe phenotype of COVID-19

For rs1024611 in CCL2, rs10774671 in OAS1, and rs10406145 in DPP9 gene variants, further haplotype block analysis and linkage disequilibrium were performed (Supplementary Table S5). Haplotype block analysis revealed that two of the three loci formed a single haplotype block. However, the haplotypes generated from this block were not associated with the severe COVID-19 phenotype (Table 4). Frequency distributions of seven major haplotypes (AAC, AAG, AGG, GAC, GAG, GGG, AGC, and GGC, identified by SHEsis software) in cases and controls are shown in Table 5. When the ACC, AAG, and GAG haplotype frequencies were compared between individuals with severe COVID-19 and asymptomatic-mild controls, the results indicated a significant difference between the frequencies of these haplotypes in patients with severe COVID-19 (P=0.001598). Haplotype frequency analysis revealed that the coexistence of CCL2 rs1024611-G, OAS1 rs10774671-A, and DPP9 rs10406145-G alleles in the same individual increased the presence of the severe COVID-19 phenotype (OR=2.273, 95% CI: 1.271-4.068, P=0.005305). In contrast, the frequency of the AAG haplotype was significantly lower in patients with the severe COVID-19 phenotype than in controls (P=0.000804), which was associated with a protective effect against the severe clinical COVID-19 phenotype (OR = 0.328, 95% CI: 0.168-0.639). Other haplotype frequencies and the COVID-19 phenotype did not significantly correlate.

Table 4

Table 4 Haplotype Distribution of OAS1 rs10774671 and DPPL6 rs10406145 gene variants in the Case and Controls Groups.

Table 5

Table 5 Haplotype analysis of the loci CCL2, OAS1, and DPP9.

4 Discussion

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and candidate SNV association analyses have identified genes associated with the COVID-19 phenotype (Pairo-Castineira et al., 2021; Pathak et al., 2021; Rüter et al., 2022). Numerous studies indicate that host genetic variants play a significant role in the severity of COVID-19 (Williams et al., 2020); as a result, the interaction of genetic and environmental factors may partially account for the observed phenotypic spectrum in COVID-19. Furthermore, there are data highlighting ethnic differences in the prevalence of the severe phenotype of COVID-19 (Webb Hooper et al., 2020; Oda et al., 2021; Ishak et al., 2022; Tai et al., 2022). Because different populations have distinct genetic backgrounds, there may be variations in the allele and genotype frequencies of genes associated with COVID-19. Consequently, the role of these gene variants may vary among ethnically different populations. Several candidate genes have been evaluated to estimate their association with COVID-19, but the effect of gene variants on the phenotypic spectrum of COVID-19 in Latin American populations is largely unexplored and needs to be investigated. The present study focused on the association between the SNVs CCL2 rs1024611, OAS1 rs10774671, and DPP9 rs10406145 and severe COVID-19 in a population from Quito, Ecuador. We compared the allele and genotype frequencies in an attempt to find genetic markers that are associated with the COVID-19 phenotype in a mixed Ecuadorian population with a high level of Native American ancestry. The results of the current study support the notion that the geographic location of populations affects the allele and genotype frequencies of SNVs, and they also emphasize the importance of genetic population studies in ethnically diverse groups.

Ecuador is currently a multiethnic society. Multiple migration and admixture events, including Native American settlements and the movement of Western European and Sub-Saharan African individuals, have influenced on the complex pre- and post-Columbian demographic history of Ecuador. However, patterns of admixture varied widely across Ecuador, in part due to geographic region (Santangelo et al., 2017; Nagar et al., 2021). For example, Mestizos (mixed individuals) are the most prevalent ethnic group in the Andean highlands (Sierra) of Ecuador, although Native American ancestry is estimated to make up about 65% of this Mestizo population, which is higher than any other mixed American group observed in South America, except for Peru (Santangelo et al., 2017; Nagar et al., 2021).

For the gene variants analyzed in this study, few publications have reported allele and genotype frequencies for Latin American populations. The MAF for the rs1024611 A→G variant of the CCL2 gene was 0.28 in 233,286 individuals, according to data from the Allele Frequency Aggregator (ALFA) pipeline of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). This contrasts with the results of the present study. In the Asian population, the G allele of this gene variant is 0.56, which is closer to our study. However, the frequency reported in groups in Mexico and Peru with a strong Native American ancestry is comparable to that found in the current study (Flores-Villanueva et al., 2005; Ganachari et al., 2012). Notably, the frequency of the A allele for the rs1024611 variant of the CCL2 gene was higher in a Latin American population with a high Western European ancestry compared to that found in our study (Velez Edwards et al., 2012).

The same scenario is also observed for rs10774671 of OAS1 and rs10406145 of DPP9 gene variants in our study, where the allele and genotype frequencies are very similar in Latin American populations with high Native American ancestry (Sánchez-González et al., 2021) and with East Asian populations, but they differ significantly from Western European and African populations (European Bioinformatics Institute, 2023). The correspondence in the genetic structure between the East Asian population and the participants in our study could be explained by a common ancestral origin, as has been reported for the HLA marker system between Han Chinese and South American Native populations (Tokunaga et al., 2001). Native Americans are descended from migrations of Asian populations that crossed the Bering land bridge from East Asia during glacial periods 15,000 to 30,000 years ago. However, the fixation of alleles in populations with recent admixture, such as the Ecuadorian population, may be influenced by other factors such as genetic drift, including bottleneck and founder effects. This similarity also seems to be observed in the clinical setting. For example, in a German study, the G allele in the rs1024611 variant of CCL2 was found to have a protective effect against the severe form of COVID-19 in the codominant model (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.39-0.78; P = 0.001), and the frequency of the A allele was higher than that reported in our study (Rüter et al., 2022).

In contrast, our data showed that the GG genotype is associated with the severe COVID-19 phenotype in a recessive model. The GG genotype was also consistently associated with SARS-CoV infection in four independent case-control studies in populations of Chinese ancestry (Tu et al., 2015). Thus, the clinical effect of these SNVs may vary in ethnically diverse populations. In a molecular context, the gene variant has been shown to confer increased transcriptional activity with higher levels of CCL2 mRNA and protein in vivo and in vitro. In addition, greater leukocyte tissue infiltration has been reported in carriers of the GG genotype compared to individuals with the A allele (Gonzalez et al., 2002; Mühlbauer et al., 2003; McDermott et al., 2005; Li et al., 2022). Thus, individuals with the GG genotype may have a higher expression of CCL2 and, consequently, a higher attraction of monocytes and macrophages, which is associated with the severe COVID-19 phenotype.

Our study showed a significant increase in the frequency of the G allele (77%) and the GG genotype (63%) in CCL2 in individuals in the case group compared to those in the control group. These findings suggest a possible association between the rs1024611-G variant in CCL2 and the severe form of COVID-19 in an Ecuadorian population. In addition, we found that the CCL2 rs1024611-G allele had a significantly higher frequency in the case group after adjustment for age (<50 and ≥50 years), sex, obesity (BMI ≥30), and comorbidities, and rs1024611-G was found to be associated with the severe phenotype of COVID-19 in a recessive genetic model. Similarly, the OAS1 rs1024611-GG genotype was found to be associated with the severe COVID-19 phenotype in a log-additive genetic model. In contrast, no significant associations with the severe COVID-19 phenotype were found for the allele or genotype of DPP9 rs10406145 in our study. However, we showed that the DPP9 rs10406145-GG genotype was more common in the asymptomatic-mild group compared to individuals with the severe COVID-19 phenotype. Nonetheless, this latter difference did not meet the more stringent 0.005 level of statistical significance required by the Bonferroni correction. This association would likely reach significance in a study with a larger cohort.

Although the genes analyzed in our study have been associated with monogenic and multifactorial traits (coronary artery disease, immunodeficiency 100 with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis and hypogammaglobulinemia, resistance to HIV-1, susceptibility to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and spina bifida, among others), no correlation was found between CCL2 and any COVID-19-related comorbidities in a GWAS that included inflammatory protein-coding genes in older males (Hillary et al., 2020). Furthermore, another study that used the GWAS approach to relate changes in metabolite and protein levels, including CCL2, to intermediate phenotypes found no correlation with COVID-19-related comorbidities (Suhre et al., 2017). However, in one study, the OAS1 gene rs11066453 variant (p=4.53×10-9) was associated with 1-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) hyperglycemia (1-hPG), but not fasting plasma glucose or 2-hP (Go et al., 2013). Similarly, SNV rs10410207 in the DPP9 gene was shown to be significantly correlated with 2-hydroxyoctanoate levels in a study assessing lipid concentrations in elite athletes (Al-Khelaifi et al., 2019). Mendelian randomization studies between genetic variations associated with COVID-19 and its comorbidities may provide relevant data in this regard.

Studies have shown that the prevalence of the severe form of COVID-19 is significantly higher in males than in females when adjusted for age and comorbidities (Williamson et al., 2020; Gao et al., 2021; Shelton et al., 2021; Song et al., 2021). In our study, individuals with the severe phenotype of COVID-19 had significantly different mean age and BMI, as well as the presence of obesity and comorbid conditions, compared with the control group. We found a significant sex difference between the case and control groups (P= 0.013), but the stratified analysis showed no interaction between sex and the CCL2 rs1024611 or OAS1 rs1024611 variants and the severe COVID-19 phenotype. However, the presence of the DPP9 rs10406145-GG genotype showed a fourfold greater association with the severe form of COVID-19 in males than in females in a recessive genetic model (OR = 4.47, 95% CI 1.04-19.21), after adjustment for other confounding variables. In contrast, we found that in those individuals younger than 50 years, the CC genotype at DPP9 rs10406145 was associated with severe COVID-19. Nevertheless, after Bonferroni correction, this association was not significantly associated with the severe phenotype. It is plausible that specific genes influencing the severe COVID-19 phenotype may be associated with comorbidities. However, no significant interaction was found between the gene variants analyzed and pre-existing medical comorbidities in our subjects.

Allele arrangements that tend to be inherited together are called haplotypes. Two of the three loci were found to form a single haplotype block in the current analysis. However, no association with the severe phenotype of COVID-19 was observed in the haplotypes generated from this block. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, the CCL2 rs1024611-GG genotype may be independently associated with severe COVID-19. However, haplotypes are often more predictive of disease-related genes than are individual SNVs. Our results showed that the severe COVID-19 phenotype was associated with the co-occurrence of the CCL2 rs1024611-G, OAS1 rs1024611-A, and DPP9 rs10406145-G alleles. Thus, it is possible that the GAG haplotype may be involved in the presence of the severe phenotype of COVID-19 in the Ecuadorian population. In contrast, the frequency of the AAG haplotype, which is formed by the same genetic variants, was lower in patients with severe COVID-19 than in patients with asymptomatic-mild COVID-19. Thus, the AAG haplotype may have a protective effect against the severe phenotype of COVID-19 in the Ecuadorian population.

Our study has several strengths. To obtain a more precise effect size, we used a covariate-adjusted multivariate model associated with the presence of COVID-19 severity. We were unable to include all factors associated with COVID-19 severity. Nonetheless, we consider that we have accounted for the most important confounding variables in our study, which would make our results more robust. We also analyzed different genetic models and selected the best one based on the lowest of the AIC values and P-values among the four inheritance patterns, although the most ideal model has not been established (Horita and Kaneko, 2015). We also performed haplotype analysis of the alleles of non-linked genes. Thus, these gene variants are subject to the Mendelian law of independent assortment. They are not affected by the process of crossing over. Therefore, the combination of haplotypes is useful in gene-disease association analysis to more precisely associate alleles or genotypes.

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron VOC (B.1.1.529 lineage) first emerged in South Africa in November 2021 and has since spread quickly around the world (Jassat et al., 2022). The emergence of this fifth VOC coincided with a global increase in vaccine immunity. Compared to wild type and previous VOCs, Omicron is distinguished by a number of spike protein mutations that are known to result in increased transmissibility, viral binding affinity, and antibody escape (Harvey et al., 2021; Karim and Karim, 2021; Sheikh et al., 2022). However, current evidence suggests that Omicron may be associated with a less severe clinical presentation compared with the previous variants of SARS-CoV-2 (Jassat et al., 2022). Studies from South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States have reported significantly lower odds of hospitalization and severe disease in Omicron-infected individuals compared to those infected with previous VOCs. According to one study, although more SARS-CoV-2 cases were documented during the Omicron wave, hospitalization rates were lower, and patients who were admitted had a much shorter median length of stay and were less likely to be severely ill than patients admitted during previous waves (Jassat et al., 2022). According to the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Omicron patients were also less likely to visit or be admitted to the hospital than those infected with the Delta variant (Wolter et al., 2022). Similarly, Omicron-infected individuals were reported to have a reduced risk of hospitalization compared to Delta-infected individuals (Sheikh et al., 2022). Likewise, Omicron subjects were reported to require less respiratory support than in previous VOCs (Christensen et al., 2022). As noted above, several factors, including VOCs, reinfection with SARS-CoV-2, and vaccination, influence the clinical severity of COVID-19. Omicron has a significant reinfection rate (Pulliam et al., 2022). Omicron was reported to have a ten-fold higher potential reinfection rate than Delta VOC (Sheikh et al., 2022). The UKHSA also reported that Omicron individuals who received 2 or 3 doses of any vaccine had a lower hospitalization rate than those unvaccinated Omicron-infected subjects (Wolter et al., 2022). Furthermore, those who received the third or booster dose of the vaccine were less likely to develop symptoms following an Omicron infection. A less virulent virus and high immunity from previous infection(s) or vaccination, particularly in vaccinated individuals with re-infection (“hybrid immunity”), may have contributed to lower hospitalization rates and less severe infections among SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals during the Omicron-dominated fourth wave (Cele et al., 2022). Moreover, Omicron VOC infected bronchial cells more rapidly and alveolar cells more slowly than Delta VOC in an ex vivo study (Hui et al., 2022). This may explain the less severe infections observed in Omicron cases. Omicron has also been shown to have reduced virulence in animal models. Mice infected with Omicron had less severe disease than those treated with other variants (Halfmann et al., 2022).

Several limitations of this study must be considered. The reduced sample size and the lack of a replication-independent cohort to verify the associations were the main limitations of our study. The smaller sample size of participants in our study also limits the statistical interpretation of the significant (type I error (false positive)) and nonsignificant (type II error (false negative)) associations. In addition, because we tested genetic variants in individuals living only in the Andean region of Ecuador, the small sample size may not accurately represent the entire population of Ecuador. As a result, it is unclear whether our findings are generalizable to other regions and Latin American countries. We increased the power of our association study by excluding the effect of the most important confounding variables and by using the Bonferroni correction test. Another limitation is that all healthy staff in the control group were infected during the first wave of the pandemic, at a time when vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 were not available, rather than enrolling individuals in communities. In contrast, the study group was represented by individuals from a single hospital with two doses of vaccine, who required invasive mechanical ventilation and intensive care during the Omicron VOC dominant wave. This certainly introduces a selection bias that may affect the gene distribution. Comparing the results between a group of healthy subjects and a group of individuals with COVID-19 would only help to identify genes associated with susceptibility to the disease, not the clinical spectrum of the phenotype. Given that SARS-CoV-2 has infected most of the world’s population, it may not be feasible to recruit a healthy control group that has not been exposed to SARS-CoV-2. Our goal was to find the gene variants associated with disease severity. Also, because of the low prevalence of each comorbidity reported individually by each patient, it is also likely that a bias could be present. However, we have grouped them together and their combined effects have been calculated in the regression analysis. Based on available data, it appears that the Omicron variant does not have a stronger association with severe COVID-19 than other VoCs. It is likely that hybrid immunity favors a less severe phenotype associated with Omicron VoC. We have taken advantage of this to unmask more clearly how genetic variables affect a complex trait such as COVID-19. A greater influence of genetic factors may be present in previously immunized individuals with the severe form of COVID-19. Thus, we compared individuals who undergone the severe form of the disease and who had already received at least two vaccines from unimmunized subjects with the asymptomatic-mild form from. This design was done to increase the power to detect gene variants related to the severity of the COVID-19 phenotype. The absence of selection bias in our analysis is suggested by HWE and the similarity of allele and genotype frequencies across both groups.

To summarize, while the recessive genetic model showed that CCL2 rs1024611-G and OAS1 rs10774671-G gene variants were associated with COVID-19, no association was found for DPP9 rs10406145 in our study. We could not completely exclude the potential of DPP9 as a gene associated with the severe COVID-19 phenotype due to undetectable genotype frequencies or small effects of these variants. Genetic association studies of the COVID-19 phenotype are very limited in Latin America, and our research helps to clarify the role of genetic factors in the COVID-19 phenotype. A larger sample size, a replication cohort, and additional SNVs may need to be explored. The experience with COVID-19 provided an opportunity to identify an ethnicity-based approach to recognize genetically high-risk individuals in different populations for emerging diseases. Identifying high-risk individuals who need urgent medical attention is especially important during epidemics. It can be very helpful in formulating policies and allocating resources.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by The Comite de Etica para la Revisión Expedita de Investigaciones en COVID-19 of the Ministerio de Salud Publica of Ecuador (MSP-CGDES-2020-0244-O1). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

EC-V: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. FÁ-N: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AT-V: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft. TB-D: Writing – original draft. KP: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft. CA-L: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. IP: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft. KN: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Direccion de Investigacion and the Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Innovación y Doctorado from the Universidad Central del Ecuador (Grant COVID-19-26).

Acknowledgments

We are extremely grateful to healthcare staff from the Hospital Quito Sur of the Instituto Ecuatoriano de Seguridad Social (Quito-SUR-IESS), Quito, Ecuador, who took part in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1322882/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

ARDS, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome; BMI, Body Mass Index; COVID-19, Coronavirus Disease 2019; CT, Computed Tomography; GWAS, Genome-Wide Association Study; HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; LD, Linkage disequilibrium; MAF, Minor Allele Frequency; OR (95% CI), Odds Ratio along with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals; PCR-RFLP, Polymerase Chain Reaction-based Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism; PCR, Polymerase Chain Reaction; RT-qPCR, Reverse Transcription quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction; SARS-CoV-2, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2; SNV, Single Nucleotide Variant; VOC, Variants of Concern; WHO, World Health Organization; χ2, Chi-square test.

References

Al-Khelaifi, F., Diboun, I., Donati, F., Botrè, F., Abraham, D., Hingorani, A., et al. (2019). Metabolic GWAS of elite athletes reveals novel genetically-influenced metabolites associated with athletic performance. Sci. Rep. 9, 19889. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56496-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bagheri-Hosseinabadi, Z., Kaeidi, A., Rezvani, M., Taghipour Khaje Sharifi, G., Abbasifard, M. (2024). Evaluation of the serum levels of CCL2, CCL3, and IL-29 after first and second administrations of the COVID-19 vaccine (Oxford–AstraZeneca). Immunobiology 229, 152789. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2024.152789

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barash, A., Machluf, Y., Ariel, I., Dekel, Y. (2020). The pursuit of COVID-19 biomarkers: putting the spotlight on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 regulatory sequences. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 7. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.582793

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Biswas, M., Rahaman, S., Biswas, T. K., Haque, Z., Ibrahim, B. (2021). Association of sex, age, and comorbidities with mortality in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intervirology 64, 36–47. doi: 10.1159/000512592

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bollyky, T. J., Hulland, E. N., Barber, R. M., Collins, J. K., Kiernan, S., Moses, M., et al. (2022). Pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: an exploratory analysis of infection and fatality rates, and contextual factors associated with preparedness in 177 countries, from Jan 1, 2020, to Sept 30, 2021. Lancet 399, 1489–1512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00172-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bonnevie-Nielsen, V., Leigh Field, L., Lu, S., Zheng, D.-J., Li, M., Martensen, P. M., et al. (2005). Variation in antiviral 2′,5′-oligoadenylate synthetase (2′5′AS) enzyme activity is controlled by a single-nucleotide polymorphism at a splice-acceptor site in the OAS1 gene. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 76, 623–633. doi: 10.1086/429391

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, Y., Yisimayi, A., Jian, F., Song, W., Xiao, T., Wang, L., et al. (2022). BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 escape antibodies elicited by Omicron infection. Nature 608, 593–602. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04980-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cele, S., Jackson, L., Khoury, D. S., Khan, K., Moyo-Gwete, T., Tegally, H., et al. (2022). Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization. Nature 602, 654–656. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04387-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, X., Huang, H., Ju, J., Sun, R., Zhang, J. (2022). Impact of vaccination on the COVID-19 pandemic in U.S. states. Sci. Rep. 12, 1554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05498-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chenchula, S., Karunakaran, P., Sharma, S., Chavan, M. (2022). Current evidence on efficacy of COVID-19 booster dose vaccination against the Omicron variant: A systematic review. J. Med. Virol. 94, 2969–2976. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27697

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Christensen, P. A., Olsen, R. J., Long, S. W., Snehal, R., Davis, J. J., Ojeda Saavedra, M., et al. (2022). Signals of significantly increased vaccine breakthrough, decreased hospitalization rates, and less severe disease in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 caused by the omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in Houston, Texas. Am. J. Pathol. 192, 642–652. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2022.01.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Conrady, C. D., Zheng, M., Mandal, N. A., van Rooijen, N., Carr, D. J. J. (2013). IFN-α-driven CCL2 production recruits inflammatory monocytes to infection site in mice. Mucosal Immunol. 6, 45–55. doi: 10.1038/mi.2012.46

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Downes, D. J., Cross, A. R., Hua, P., Roberts, N., Schwessinger, R., Cutler, A. J., et al. (2021). Identification of LZTFL1 as a candidate effector gene at a COVID-19 risk locus. Nat. Genet. 53, 1606–1615. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00955-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

European Bioinformatics Institute (2023). European Molecular Biology Laboratory (Cambridge, United Kingdom European Bioinformatics Institute).

Google Scholar

Flores-Villanueva, P. O., Ruiz-Morales, J. A., Song, C.-H., Flores, L. M., Jo, E.-K., Montaño, M., et al. (2005). A functional promoter polymorphism in monocyte chemoattractant protein–1 is associated with increased susceptibility to pulmonary tuberculosis. J. Exp. Med. 202, 1649–1658. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050126

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fricke-Galindo, I., Falfán-Valencia, R. (2021). Genetics insight for COVID-19 susceptibility and severity: A review. Front. Immunol. 12. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.622176

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ganachari, M., Guio, H., Zhao, N., Flores-Villanueva, P. O. (2012). Host gene-encoded severe lung TB: from genes to the potential pathways. Genes Immun. 13, 605–620. doi: 10.1038/gene.2012.39

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, Y., Ding, M., Dong, X., Zhang, J., Kursat Azkur, A., Azkur, D., et al. (2021). Risk factors for severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients: A review. Allergy 76, 428–455. doi: 10.1111/all.14657

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Go, M. J., Hwang, J.-Y., Kim, Y. J., Hee Oh, J., Kim, Y.-J., Heon Kwak, S., et al. (2013). New susceptibility loci in MYL2, C12orf51 and OAS1 associated with 1-h plasma glucose as predisposing risk factors for type 2 diabetes in the Korean population. J. Hum. Genet. 58, 362–365. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2013.14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gonzalez, E., Rovin, B. H., Sen, L., Cooke, G., Dhanda, R., Mummidi, S., et al. (2002). HIV-1 infection and AIDS dementia are influenced by a mutant MCP-1 allele linked to increased monocyte infiltration of tissues and MCP-1 levels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99, 13795–13800. doi: 10.1073/pnas.202357499

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Graffelman, J. (2015). Exploring diallelic genetic markers: the hardyWeinberg package. J. Stat. Softw 64, 1-23. doi: 10.18637/jss.v064.i03

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Graffelman, J., Weir, B. S. (2016). Testing for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium at biallelic genetic markers on the X chromosome. Heredity (Edinb) 116, 558–568. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2016.20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guevara, R., Prado-Vivar, B., Márquez, S., Muñoz, E. B., Carvajal, M., Guadalupe, J. J., et al. (2022). Occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections at regular intervals in Ecuador. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 12. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.951383

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Halfmann, P. J., Iida, S., Iwatsuki-Horimoto, K., Maemura, T., Kiso, M., Scheaffer, S. M., et al. (2022). SARS-CoV-2 Omicron virus causes attenuated disease in mice and hamsters. Nature 603, 687–692. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04441-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harvey, W. T., Carabelli, A. M., Jackson, B., Gupta, R. K., Thomson, E. C., Harrison, E. M., et al. (2021). SARS-CoV-2 variants, spike mutations and immune escape. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 409–424. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00573-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hillary, R. F., Trejo-Banos, D., Kousathanas, A., McCartney, D. L., Harris, S. E., Stevenson, A. J., et al. (2020). Multi-method genome- and epigenome-wide studies of inflammatory protein levels in healthy older adults. Genome Med. 12, 60. doi: 10.1186/s13073-020-00754-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hollingsworth, L. R., Sharif, H., Griswold, A. R., Fontana, P., Mintseris, J., Dagbay, K. B., et al. (2021). DPP9 sequesters the C terminus of NLRP1 to repress inflammasome activation. Nature 592, 778–783. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03350-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Horita, N., Kaneko, T. (2015). Genetic model selection for a case–control study and a meta-analysis. Meta Gene 5, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.mgene.2015.04.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Horowitz, J. E., Kosmicki, J. A., Damask, A., Sharma, D., Roberts, G. H. L., Justice, A. E., et al. (2022). Genome-wide analysis provides genetic evidence that ACE2 influences COVID-19 risk and yields risk scores associated with severe disease. Nat. Genet. 54, 382–392. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-01006-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hui, K. P. Y., Ho, J. C. W., Cheung, M., Ng, K., Ching, R. H. H., Lai, K., et al. (2022). SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant replication in human bronchus and lung ex vivo. Nature 603, 715–720. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04479-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ishak, A., Mehendale, M., AlRawashdeh, M. M., Sestacovschi, C., Sharath, M., Pandav, K., et al. (2022). The association of COVID-19 severity and susceptibility and genetic risk factors: A systematic review of the literature. Gene 836, 146674. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2022.146674

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jassat, W., Abdool Karim, S. S., Mudara, C., Welch, R., Ozougwu, L., Groome, M. J., et al. (2022). Clinical severity of COVID-19 in patients admitted to hospital during the omicron wave in South Africa: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Glob Health 10, e961–e969. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00114-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karim, S. S. A., Karim, Q. A. (2021). Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant: a new chapter in the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet 398, 2126–2128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02758-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kjær, K. H., Pahus, J., Hansen, M. F., Poulsen, J. B., Christensen, E. I., Justesen, J., et al. (2014). Mitochondrial localization of the OAS1 p46 isoform associated with a common single nucleotide polymorphism. BMC Cell Biol. 15, 33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-15-33

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., He, J., Shao, Y., Chen, L., Li, M., Tang, D., et al. (2022). Study on the association between the polymorphism of MCP-1 rs1024611 and the genetic susceptibility of type 2 diabetes with sepsis. Medicine 101, e29903. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029903

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mathur, R., Rentsch, C. T., Morton, C. E., Hulme, W. J., Schultze, A., MacKenna, B., et al. (2021). Ethnic differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission, and death in 17 million adults in England: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform. Lancet 397, 1711–1724. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00634-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McDermott, D. H., Yang, Q., Kathiresan, S., Cupples, L. A., Massaro, J. M., Keaney, J. F., et al. (2005). CCL2 polymorphisms are associated with serum monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 levels and myocardial infarction in the Framingham heart study. Circulation 112, 1113–1120. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.543579

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mühlbauer, M., Bosserhoff, A. K., Hartmann, A., Thasler, W. E., Weiss, T. S., Herfarth, H., et al. (2003). A novel MCP-1 gene polymorphism is associated with hepatic MCP-1 expression and severity of HCV-related liver disease. Gastroenterology 125, 1085–1093. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)01213-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nagar, S. D., Conley, A. B., Chande, A. T., Rishishwar, L., Sharma, S., Mariño-Ramírez, L., et al. (2021). Genetic ancestry and ethnic identity in Ecuador. Hum. Genet. Genomics Adv. 2, 100050. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100050

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakanishi, T., Pigazzini, S., Degenhardt, F., Cordioli, M., Butler-Laporte, G., Maya-Miles, D., et al. (2021). Age-dependent impact of the major common genetic risk factor for COVID-19 on severity and mortality. J Clin Invest 13, e152386. doi: 10.1172/JCI152386

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Niedzwiedz, C. L., O’Donnell, C. A., Jani, B. D., Demou, E., Ho, F. K., Celis-Morales, C., et al. (2020). Ethnic and socioeconomic differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection: prospective cohort study using UK Biobank. BMC Med. 18, 160. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01640-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Niemi, M. E. K., Daly, M. J., Ganna, A. (2022). The human genetic epidemiology of COVID-19. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 533–546. doi: 10.1038/s41576-022-00478-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Noguchi, S., Hamano, E., Matsushita, I., Hijikata, M., Ito, H., Nagase, T., et al. (2013). Differential effects of a common splice site polymorphism on the generation of OAS1 variants in human bronchial epithelial cells. Hum. Immunol. 74, 395–401. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2012.11.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nohynek, H., Wilder-Smith, A. (2022). Does the world still need new covid-19 vaccines? New Engl. J. Med. 386, 2140–2142. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2204695

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Observatorio Social del Ecuador (2024). Available online at: https://www.covid19Ecuador.org/fallecidos.

Google Scholar

Oda, G., Sharma, A., Lucero-Obusan, C., Schirmer, P., Sohoni, P., Holodniy, M. (2021). COVID-19 infections among healthcare personnel in the United States veterans health administration, march to August 2020. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 63, 291–295. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pairo-Castineira, E., Clohisey, S., Klaric, L., Bretherick, A. D., Rawlik, K., Pasko, D., et al. (2021). Genetic mechanisms of critical illness in COVID-19. Nature 591, 92–98. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03065-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pathak, G. A., Singh, K., Miller-Fleming, T. W., Wendt, F. R., Ehsan, N., Hou, K., et al. (2021). Integrative genomic analyses identify susceptibility genes underlying COVID-19 hospitalization. Nat. Commun. 12, 4569. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24824-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pulliam, J. R. C., van Schalkwyk, C., Govender, N., von Gottberg, A., Cohen, C., Groome, M. J., et al. (2022). Increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection associated with emergence of Omicron in South Africa. Sci. (1979) 376, 1–8. doi: 10.1126/science.abn4947

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qiu, X. S., Tang, N. L. S., Yeung, H. Y., Qiu, Y., Cheng, J. C. Y. (2008). Association study between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the DPP9 gene which is located in the candidate region identified by linkage analysis. Postgrad Med. J. 84, 498–501. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2007.066639

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rüter, J., Pallerla, S. R., Meyer, C. G., Casadei, N., Sonnabend, M., Peter, S., et al. (2022). Host genetic loci LZTFL1 and CCL2 associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and severity of COVID-19. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 122, 427–436. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.06.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sánchez-González, M. T., Cienfuegos-Jiménez, O., Álvarez-Cuevas, S., Pérez-Maya, A. A., Borrego-Soto, G., Marino-Martínez, I. A. (2021). Prevalence of the SNP rs10774671 of the OAS1 gene in Mexico as a possible predisposing factor for RNA virus disease. Int. J. Mol. Epidemiol. Genet. 12, 52–60.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Santangelo, R., González-Andrade, F., Børsting, C., Torroni, A., Pereira, V., Morling, N. (2017). Analysis of ancestry informative markers in three main ethnic groups from Ecuador supports a trihybrid origin of Ecuadorians. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 31, 29–33. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.08.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sefik, E., Qu, R., Junqueira, C., Kaffe, E., Mirza, H., Zhao, J., et al. (2022). Inflammasome activation in infected macrophages drives COVID-19 pathology. Nature 606, 585–593. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04802-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheikh, A., Kerr, S., Woolhouse, M., McMenamin, J., Robertson, C., Simpson, C. R., et al. (2022). Severity of omicron variant of concern and effectiveness of vaccine boosters against symptomatic disease in Scotland (EAVE II): a national cohort study with nested test-negative design. Lancet Infect. Dis. 22, 959–966. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00141-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shelton, J. F., Shastri, A. J., Ye, C., Weldon, C. H., Filshtein-Sonmez, T., Coker, D., et al. (2021). Trans-ancestry analysis reveals genetic and nongenetic associations with COVID-19 susceptibility and severity. Nat. Genet. 53, 801–808. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00854-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, J., Park, D. W., Cha, J., Seok, H., Kim, J. Y., Park, J., et al. (2021). Clinical course and risk factors of fatal adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients in Korea: a nationwide retrospective cohort study. Sci. Rep. 11, 10066. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89548-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suhre, K., Arnold, M., Bhagwat, A. M., Cotton, R. J., Engelke, R., Raffler, J., et al. (2017). Connecting genetic risk to disease end points through the human blood plasma proteome. Nat. Commun. 8, 14357. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14357

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tai, D. B. G., Sia, I. G., Doubeni, C. A., Wieland, M. L. (2022). Disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on racial and ethnic minority groups in the United States: a 2021 update. J. Racial Ethn Health Disparities 9, 2334–2339. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01170-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tokunaga, K., Ohashi, J., Bannai, M., Juji, T. (2001). Genetic link between Asians and native Americans: evidence from HLA genes and haplotypes. Hum. Immunol. 62, 1001–1008. doi: 10.1016/S0198-8859(01)00301-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tu, X., Chong, W. P., Zhai, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, F., Wang, S., et al. (2015). Functional polymorphisms of the CCL2 and MBL genes cumulatively increase susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. J. Infection 71, 101–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.03.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Velavan, T. P., Pallerla, S. R., Rüter, J., Augustin, Y., Kremsner, P. G., Krishna, S., et al. (2021). Host genetic factors determining COVID-19 susceptibility and severity. EBioMedicine 72, 103629. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103629

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Velez Edwards, D. R., Tacconelli, A., Wejse, C., Hill, P. C., Morris, G. A. J., Edwards, T. L., et al. (2012). MCP1 SNPs and pulmonary tuberculosis in cohorts from west africa, the USA and Argentina: lack of association or epistasis with IL12B polymorphisms. PloS One 7, e32275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032275

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Balmat, T. J., Antonia, A. L., Constantine, F. J., Henao, R., Burke, T. W., et al. (2021). An atlas connecting shared genetic architecture of human diseases and molecular phenotypes provides insight into COVID-19 susceptibility. Genome Med. 13, 83. doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00904-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Qin, Q. (2020). Unique epidemiological and clinical features of the emerging 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) implicate special control measures. J. Med. Virol. 92, 568–576. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25748

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Webb Hooper, M., Nápoles, A. M., Pérez-Stable, E. J. (2020). COVID-19 and racial/ethnic disparities. JAMA 323, 2466. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8598

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

WHO (2023) The WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available online at: https://covid19.who.int.

Google Scholar

Williams, F. M. K., Freidin, M. B., Mangino, M., Couvreur, S., Visconti, A., Bowyer, R. C. E., et al. (2020). Self-reported symptoms of COVID-19, including symptoms most predictive of SARS-coV-2 infection, are heritable. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 23, 316–321. doi: 10.1017/thg.2020.85

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Williamson, E. J., Walker, A. J., Bhaskaran, K., Bacon, S., Bates, C., Morton, C. E., et al. (2020). Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature 584, 430–436. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wolter, N., Jassat, W., Walaza, S., Welch, R., Moultrie, H., Groome, M., et al. (2022). Early assessment of the clinical severity of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant in South Africa: a data linkage study. Lancet 399, 437–446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00017-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar