Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 10 January 2024
Sec. Clinical Microbiology

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex: insights into evolutionary relationships, global distribution and pathogenicity

Kun Li,Kun Li1,2Keyi YuKeyi Yu2Zhenzhou HuangZhenzhou Huang3Xiao LiuXiao Liu2Li MeiLi Mei4Xiaodong Ren,Xiaodong Ren1,2Xuemei BaiXuemei Bai2He GaoHe Gao2Zhiwen SunZhiwen Sun2Xiaoning Liu*Xiaoning Liu1*Duochun Wang*Duochun Wang2*
  • 1School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
  • 2National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
  • 3Microbiology Laboratory, Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, China
  • 4National Pathogen Resource Center, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China

Introduction: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex (Smc) comprises opportunistic Gram-negative bacilli responsible for various nosocomial infections. Limited data exists concerning its evolutionary lineage, global prevalence and pathogenicity.

Methods: We conducted an extensive genomic analysis on 734 Smc genomes, of which 90 were newly sequenced and isolated from different patients. The species composition and evolutionary relationships of Smc were examined using core protein sequence analysis. Pathogenicity evaluation was used by assays for swimming motility, biofilm formation and identification of virulence factors. The broth microdilution method was used to evaluate the drug resistance spectrum of clinical isolates.

Results: Phylogenetic analyses delineated 24 species-level clades, dominated by S. maltophilia (42.8%), S. sepilia (13.6%) and S. geniculata (9.9%). Geographically, strains were primarily distributed in Europe (34.2%), Asia (33.7%) and North America (24.0%), with intricate global distribution patterns. Meanwhile, 154 virulence-associated genes and 46 antimicrobial resistance genes within Smc were identified. These genes encoded span various functions, including motility, adherence, toxin, RND antibiotic efflux pumps, beta-lactamases and aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. Moreover, significant variations were indicated in swimming motility and biofilm-forming capability across the different species, with S. sepilia exhibiting superior levels of both traits. Additionally, no statistically significant discrepancy was detected among Smc species to other antibiotics, despite the fact that all S. geniculata isolates were resistant to Ceftazidime and much higher than other species.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate the need to pay increased attention to other mainstream species of Smc besides S. maltophilia in order to better manage Smc-related infections and tailor effective treatment strategies.

Introduction

The genus Stenotrophomonas comprises aerobic Gram-negative bacteria and belongs to the family Lysobacteraceae. It exhibits high diversity and metabolic versatility and can be found ubiquitously in the environment, including water, soil, plant rhizospheres and animals (Patil et al., 2016; Brooke, 2021). Currently, the genus Stenotrophomonas consists of 25 validated species, as documented by the List of Prokaryotic Names with Standing in Nomenclature (https://lpsn.dsmz.de/). Among them, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia stands as the first identified and clinically most significant species (Palleroni and Bradbury, 1993). Thorough taxonomic and phylogenomic investigations have demonstrated that S. maltophilia includes multiple cryptic species, giving rise to the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex (Smc) and a distinction that eludes conventional classification methods (Ochoa-Sánchez and Vinuesa, 2017; Kumar et al., 2020; Singh et al., 2023). This assemblage involves previously documented taxa, including Pseudomonas hibiscicola, Pseudomonas beteli, S. africana, S. geniculata, S. maltophilia, S. pavanii and S. sepilia, with S. maltophilia being the prevalent species (Rhee et al., 2013; Kumar et al., 2020; Gautam et al., 2021).

S. maltophilia constitutes an emerging opportunistic pathogen that is accountable for a wide range of nosocomial infections, including respiratory infections, bacteremia, skin and soft tissue infections, eye infections and infections connected to medical implants (Brooke, 2021). A pivotal virulence factor contributing to its pathogenicity is its capacity for attachment to both inanimate surfaces and tissues of the host, resulting in the formation of biofilm communities that possess innate resistance to antibiotics and immune responses (Pompilio et al., 2008; Pompilio et al., 2020). Moreover, it has been observed that S. maltophilia has the ability to establish colonization in the respiratory tract of individuals with cystic fibrosis, hence elevating the risk of pulmonary exacerbations and mortality (Waters et al., 2011; Waters et al., 2013). Furthermore, the bacterium’s inherent ability to resist widely utilized antimicrobial agents, including cephalosporins, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and macrolides, stems from low membrane permeability, active antibiotic efflux pumps, and antibiotic-modifying enzymes (Wang et al., 2018; Gil-Gil et al., 2020). This resistance poses a substantial threat to patients receiving treatment, particularly those with compromised immune systems (Zhao et al., 2018; Gil-Gil et al., 2020). Additionally, S. maltophilia can play a significant role in microbiological co-infections. For instance, S. maltophilia has been found to provide significant levels of protection against antibiotics for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which would otherwise be susceptible to them (Bottery et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2022) and interfere with the isolation cultures and drug sensitivity tests of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, potentially leading to alterations in treatment plans and an escalation in the burden of the disease (Li et al., 2023).

Prior research provides evidence for the presence of various species inside the Smc that are connected with human infections (Patil et al., 2018; Gautam et al., 2021). However, there are large knowledge gaps in our understanding of clinically and environmentally relevant aspects of these closely related species, such as the prevalence or proportion, the virulence factors along with the antimicrobial-resistance characteristics of each species of Smc. The wealth of genome sequences available in public databases offers a valuable resource to bridge these knowledge gaps.

In this study, we analyzed 90 newly sequenced clinical isolates from diverse regions of China together with genomes with strict quality control from public databases. We reconstructed the phylogenetic relationship of the genus Stenotrophomonas and updated the species composition of Smc. Furthermore, we explore the global population distribution structure of these species, investigate the sources of isolates, and analyze the presence of virulence and resistance genes. Additionally, the differences in biofilm formation ability, swimming ability and drug resistance phenotype among the 90 clinically derived Smc that we have newly sequenced were further evaluated. This study enhances the comprehension of the population structure and worldwide distribution of different species within the Smc, and provides the basis for gaining further insights into the species-specific clinical characteristics, potential pathogenicity, and resistance spectrum of the Smc.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and DNA isolation

All 90 strains in this study were routinely isolated from clinical specimens of different patients in China between 2019 and 2023 (Supplementary Table S1). The source from which most isolates were obtained was human sputum, followed by trachea tube, suggesting that most strains isolate from respiratory. All strains were identified as S. maltophilia by MALDI-TOF MS and DNA was extracted using the Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Tiangen biochemical technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China).

Whole-genome data collection and sequencing

A total of 758 S. maltophilia genomes were analyzed in this study. Among them, 90 clinical strains were newly sequenced (Supplementary Table S1). Another 668 uncontaminated genomes labeled “Stenotrophomonas maltophilia” with less than 200 contigs were screened and included from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/) as of March 2023 (Supplementary Table S2).

Genomes were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. The raw sequence data was evaluated by FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/), and the low-quality reads were filtered. The reads data was assembled into contigs using SOAP de novo v2.04 (Li et al., 2019). QUAST v5.0.2 (Gurevich et al., 2013) software was applied to evaluate the genome assembly. The genome size, number of coding sequences (CDSs), and GC content were estimated using Prokka v1.13.3 (Seemann, 2014).

Calculation of average nucleotide identity and phylogenetic tree construction

FastANI (Jain et al., 2018) was employed to calculate the pairwise average nucleotide identity (ANI). The similarity matrix was imported into R and plotted as a heatmap of all strains. The strains belonged to the same species when the ANI value was above 95%. The genomes that could not be assigned to a known species were compared against all type strain genomes available in the TYGS (Type (Strain) Genome Server, https://tygs.dsmz.de/) database via the MASH algorithm to determine closely related type strains.

Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Stenotrophomonas follows the previously described method (Huang et al., 2022). Ten representative genomes were selected to cover the overall genetic distance of each species for those species with more than 10 available sequenced genomes, and all the genomes for the species with less than 10 publicly available sequences were adopted. Finally, a total of 190 strains were included, and the non-redundant homologous gene set was computed by CD-HIT (Fu et al., 2012). Next, BLASTp was used to search the homologous proteins in the nonredundant homologous protein set of each strain with a cutoff value of ≥ 90% sequence identity and ≥ 60% length coverage. Each single-copy core protein sequence was aligned separately using ClustalW2 and then merged. Iqtree v1.6.11 (Minh et al., 2020) was used to construct the phylogenetic trees by the maximum-likelihood method based on all these core SNPs (bootstrap replications, 1000). The visualization and beautification of the phylogenetic tree were accomplished by the tvBOT online tool (https://www.chiplot.online/tvbot.html) (Xie et al., 2023).

Identification of virulence-associated genes and antibiotic resistance genes

Nucleotide sequences predicted by Prokka v1.13.3 (Seemann, 2014) and produce *.gff output files were used for the following identification of core genes by Roray v2.3.12 (Page et al., 2015), with default parameters. To identify the virulence-associated genes, the protein sequences of all genomes were aligned using BLASTp with a relatively relaxed cutoff (60% identity, 60% length coverage) and an E value of 1e-5 against the data set from the VFDB (Liu et al., 2022). The antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) were predicted using Resistance Gene Identifier (RGI) v6.0.2 with cutoffs of 75% identity and 80% length coverage against the data set from the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD, https://card.mcmaster.ca/) (Alcock et al., 2023).

Swimming motility assay

Logarithmically grown bacterial culture was adjusted to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.4–0.5, and an aliquot (2 μL) of the culture was transferred into the LB semisoft (0.15% agar) agar motility plates, followed by incubation at 37°C for 22–24 h. Three parallel controls were set up, and the bacterial expansion zone diameters (millimeters) were measured.

Biofilm formation assay

The crystal violet (CV) staining method was used to quantify the ability of each isolate to form biofilm as previously described (Isom et al., 2022). Bacterial cultures of strains were grown overnight in LB medium, and 2 mL was next inoculated into an individual test sterile polystyrene tube (Falcon, Coning; NY, USA) at a 1:50 dilution. Incubation was at 37 °C for 24 h without shaking, under an aerobic atmosphere, and the OD600 of each bacterial culture was measured. Then, non-adherent bacteria were removed by washing three times with sterile water carefully, and biofilm samples were fixed for 30 min at 60°C, dyed for 30 min with 0.1% CV, followed by careful rinsing with water to remove excess dyes, and solubilization of the crystal violet using dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) for 1 h. Finally, the OD570 was measured, and the OD570/OD600 ratio was used to represent the biofilm formation ability.

Antibiotic susceptibility test

A total of 90 Smc isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 15 antimicrobial agents (Levofloxacin (LVX), Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (SXT), Minocycline (MH), Ceftazidime (CAZ), Amikacin (AN), Ampicillin/Sulbactam (SAM), Aztreonam (ATM), Cefepime (FEP), Ceftriaxone (CRO), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Gentamicin (GM), Imipenem (IPM), Ertapenem (ETP), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (TZP), and Tobramycin (NN)) were detected by the broth microdilution method, and the resistance was defined using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria (Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, 2023). Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 were used as control strains.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to conduct the statistical analysis. For categorical variables, the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to determine statistical significance. P < 0.01 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Data availability

The genome sequences of the 90 clinical Smc strains sequenced in this study have been deposited at GenBank/DDBJ/ENA under the BioProject ID no. PRJNA1019301.

Results

Phylogenetic reconstruction of Smc and its composition of species

The 758 genomes were compared with type strains of the Stenotrophomonas genus by ANI calculations, and a total of 32 species-level clades were identified (Figure 1A). Among them, in addition to the 637 genomes assigned to 11 well-defined species, 121 genomes remained unassigned to any known species. Subsequently, the 121 strains were compared to the TYGS database, resulting in their identification as Stenotrophomonas spp., and could be further assigned to 21 novel Stenotrophomonas species named Genospecies 1 through Genospecies 21 (Supplementary Table S2). It is worth noting that out of the 734 strains classified as “S. maltophilia”, only 314 (41.4%) were confirmed to be S. maltophilia. The majority of the remaining strains belonged to different species within the genus Stenotrophomonas.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Species identification of 758 S. maltophilia genomes and phylogenetic analysis of the genus Stenotrophomonas. (A) The heatmap shows that pairwise average nucleotide identity of 758 genomes of S. maltophilia and type strains of the genus Stenotrophomonas and P. hibiscicola. (B) Phylogenetic placement of S. maltophilia complex strains within the genus Stenotrophomonas. Genomes belonging to the same species were folded and represented by triangles. Orange was used to indicate the evolutionary branches that make up the Smc. The robustness of tree topology was evaluated with 1,000 bootstrap replications, and values >70% are shown at the nodes of the branches. The stacked column chart represents the number of each species collected in this study, with colors indicating whether they were from public databases or newly sequenced.

The determination of phylogenetic connections among Stenotrophomonas spp. was based on the analysis of core protein sequences (Figure 1B), and the resulting phylogenetic tree revealed 24 species-level clades of Smc. The branches of each species of Smc are characterized by their short and compact arrangement, indicating a close relationship. Consequently, a total of 734 Smc genomes were incorporated into the subsequent analysis, the most prevalent species were S. maltophilia (n = 314, 42.8%), S. sepilia (n = 100, 13.6%), S. geniculata (n = 73, 9.9%), S. muris (n = 68, 9.3%), and Genospecies 1 (n = 31, 4.2%).

Population structure and global distribution of Smc

The analysis incorporated 734 strains from 39 different countries across 6 continents, with the exclusion of 16 isolates lacking information regarding their geographic origin (Figure 2A). These strains were predominantly obtained from China (n = 201, 27.4%), the United States (n = 174, 23.7%), Italy (n = 90, 12.3%), Germany (n = 60, 8.2%), and Spain (n = 28, 3.8%). The majority of strains are geographically spread over Europe (n = 251, 34.2%), Asia (n = 247, 33.7%) and North America (n = 176, 24.0%). Subsequently, smaller proportions of strains are found in Africa (n = 27, 3.6%), South America (n = 10, 1.3%) and Oceania (n = 5, 0.6%) is the least.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Global distribution of species and their composition by isolation source in Smc. (A) Geographic distribution of the 734 S. maltophilia complex strains. The map is color-coded by country to indicate the number of strains. (B) Barplot shows the number of strains per species colored by isolation source for the entire strain collection.

Given the disparity in the distribution of strains between continents, our study concentrated specifically on Europe, Asia and North America. These three continents were chosen due to their more abundant number of strains and species composition. In Europe, the prevalence of S. maltophilia was significantly higher (51.8%, P < 0.005) compared to the relatively lower occurrence of S. geniculata (4.0%, P < 0.005). S. muris strains in North America were significantly greater at 14.8% (P < 0.01). However, S. sepilia strains in North America were rather low, accounting for only 2.3% (P < 0.001). In contrast, higher proportions of these strains were found on the other two continents (Asia (19.0%), Europe (14.3%)). Additionally, S. maltophilia exhibits dominance as the prevailing species in South America and Oceania, while S. sepilia strains account for the highest proportion in Africa.

In terms of sample sources of Smc, a majority of the strains (n = 471, 64.2%) were obtained from clinical sources. The isolation source was categorized into five distinct groups (Figure 2B). The predominant isolates from the human respiratory tract were strains of Genospecies 19 (100%), Genospecies 2 (57.1%) and S. maltophilia (52.5%). Genospecies 4 (50.0%), Genospecies 5 (50.0%) and Genospecies 3 (40.0%) contained significantly more human-invasive strains compared with all other isolation sources. The prevalence of human-non-invasive origin strains was found to be significantly higher in Genospecies 14 (100%), Genospecies 7 (61.5%) and S. muris (20.6%). Additionally, environmental strains were more common in Genospecies 18 (100%), Genospecies 20 (100%), Genospecies 21 (100%) and Genospecies 9 (66.7%).

Distribution pattern of virulence-associated genes and ARGs in Smc

According to the annotations and predictions made by the VFDB database, 17 virulence factor classes, involving 154 virulence-associated genes, were obtained from 734 Smc genomes (Table 1; Figure 3), each genome contains an average of 34 virulence genes. Belonging to 7 virulence factor classes (flagella, pili, LPS, capsule, protease, Hsp60 and EF-Tu) including 25 genes were present in almost all of the Smc genomes. In addition, there are variations in the distribution of certain genes among the species of the Smc. Specifically, the cheA and manC genes were exclusively found in S. maltophilia, where they play a crucial role in flagella formation and adhesion, respectively. Moreover, we found genes associated with type VI secretion system (T6SS) in numerous species of the complex, including Genospecies 7 (100%), Genospecies 12 (100%), Genospecies 3 (90%), P. hibiscicola (35.7%), Genospecies 1 (35.5%) and S. sepilia (33.0%). The presence of the gtrB gene, which plays a role in the modification of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) O-antigen, was merely seen in S. muris. The tppA gene, encoding Type IV pili, was found solely in S. sepilia. Similarly, the xcpS gene, encoding the general secretion pathway protein F, was only found in Genospecies 11. It is worth noting that a higher percentage of S. sepilia strains (22%) lack the katA gene, which is a catalase enzyme that plays a role in increasing persistence levels in response to hydrogen peroxide disinfectants and is found in nearly all other genomes.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 The classification of virulence related factors of Smc.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Phylogenomic tree of 734 genomes of Smc and distribution of virulence-associated genes and ARGs. Phylogenetic tree performed by the ML method based on core gene sequences of Smc. The pattern of gene presence or absence is displayed in columns next to the tree. Genes that express comparable functions or those from the same class are integrated.

A total of 46 ARGs, referring to 7 antimicrobial classes of drugs, were identified against the CARD (Figure 3). Almost all genomes carry genes encoding resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) antibiotic efflux pump, beta-lactamase and aminoglycoside phosphotransferase (APH), indicating the principal resistance mechanism of Smc. The prevalence of genes producing aminoglycoside acetyltransferase (AAC) was found to be approximately 37.1%. These genes were predominantly observed in strains of S. maltophilia, S. pavanii, and S. speilia. Another aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme, aminoglycoside nucleotidyltransferase (ANT), was exclusively encoded in S. maltophilia, S. muris, Genospecies 1 and P. hibiscicola. In addition, all strains of P. hibiscicola, Genospecies 1, Genospecies 4, and Genospecies 7 did not encode smeABC (a multidrug resistance RND-type efflux pump that confers resistance to aminoglycosides, beta-lactams, and fluoroquinolones) or smeRS (a two-component regulatory system for smeABC). The sulfonamide-resistance-conferring sul1 or sul2 were found in 26 strains (3.6%), mostly occurring in clinical strains, which suggests a relatively low prevalence of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-resistant strains in our collection, which is the recommended first-line agent for the treatment of S. maltophilia infection.

Swimming motility and biofilm formation ability

We conducted an assessment of the swimming motility and biofilm forming capabilities of 90 clinical strains obtained from Smc, encompassing 13 distinct species. The findings indicated significant variations in swimming motility across the different species. S. sepilia exhibits the highest level of swimming proficiency, followed by S. pavanii, whereas Genospecies 2 displays the lowest swimming motility (Figure 4A). Meanwhile, these species have been identified with varying degrees of biofilm-forming capability. S. maltophilia and S. sepilia in particular have shown stronger biofilm formation activity, followed by Genospecies 2 and S. africana, whereas Genospecies 3 was classified as the weakest biofilm producer (Figure 4B).

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Determination of swimming motility and biofilm formation ability. (A) The swimming motility on LB (0.15% agar) measurement results of 90 clinical strains. Each image presented in the study depicts the expansion zone diameters of a single strain that is most representative of the average for its respective species. (B) Biofilm formation ability assay (crystal violet staining). Box plot shows the measurement results of each strain.

Antibiotic resistance phenotypic of Smc

A resistance phenotypic test was performed on 15 antibiotics against Smc (Supplementary Table S3). Our analyses focused on the resistance of four therapeutic drugs against S. maltophilia infections (Table 2). From all of the isolates, 44 were susceptible to the four antibiotics tested, whereas three trains, SMYL 1 (S. geniculata), SMYL 8 (Genospecies 1), SMYL 55 (S. maltophilia), were resistant or intermediary to three antibiotics. Surprisingly, all 14 strains of S. geniculata revealed resistance to Ceftazidime and exhibited significantly higher than other species (P < 0.001, Fisher’s exact test for n < 5). No statistically significant variation was observed between species in terms of resistance to the remaining three antibiotics.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Four clinical antibiotic susceptibilities of 90 Smc isolates.

Discussion

In this study, we constructed an extensive genome dataset containing 734 strains by combining 90 newly sequenced genomes of Smc. The results of phylogenetic analysis revealed that 24 species consist of Smc, and the topological structure coincided with previous researches (Patil et al., 2018; Gröschel et al., 2020). We incorporate the introduction of S. muris, a recently described species, into the species composition of the Smc. Based on the number of strains, S. maltophilia remained the dominant species within Smc (42.8%). Moreover, it is noteworthy that S. sepilia, S. geniculata, and S. muris have emerged as the dominant emerging strains in the Smc. Importantly, little is known about the pathogenicity of these species in humans, warranting further investigation.

Matthias I. Gröschel et al. subdivided Smc into 23 monophyletic lineages and clarified the global prevalence of particular lineages (Gröschel et al., 2020). In this study, significant differences have been observed in Smc population structures across continents. The species of Smc in Asia, Europe, and North America are rich, with S. maltophilia overwhelmingly dominant. The species composition of Smc in Africa, Oceania and South America is more homogeneous. S. sepilia was the mainstream species in Africa and had a higher prevalence compared to the other continents. The complex distribution pattern seen in this study further substantiates the notion of a protracted evolutionary trajectory for the Smc (Gröschel et al., 2020).

We also profiled the potential pathogenic characteristics of Smc strains. Smc strains harbor a rich virulence-associated gene pool, including 17 virulence classes. The core virulence genes are related to the functions of adherence, colonization and invasion, biofilm formation, immune evasion and proteolysis. Both clinical and environmental Smc strains showed similar distributions of potential virulence-associated genes, which is consistent with the prior studies (Adamek et al., 2014; Mercier-Darty et al., 2020) and demonstrates the complexity of its pathogenic mechanisms. It is worth mentioning that a variety of Smc species exhibit the presence of T6SS-coding genes that are not anticipated in strains of S. maltophilia. The T6SS is a mechanism employed by bacterial cells to facilitate communication with their external environment and has resemblances to the piercing apparatus in bacteriophages. P. aeruginosa employs the T6SS for the purpose of delivering toxins to adjacent pathogens and transporting protein effectors to host cells (Chen et al., 2015). Similarly, several types of gut microbiota, such as Salmonella Typhimurium and Vibrio cholerae, can enhance colonization by utilizing the T6SS, thereby increasing their pathogenicity (Sana et al., 2016; Fast et al., 2018). This implies that species other than S. maltophilia could emerge as pathogens and cause disease in humans, and infection is likely to occur primarily due to a compromised anti-infective response in infected patients (Lira et al., 2017).

Swimming motility is associated with upregulation of virulence and induction of host defense mechanisms (Kazmierczak et al., 2015) and it also plays a significant role in causing skin infections (Zegadło et al., 2023). Our study indicated that S. sepilia exhibits stronger motility, which consistent with the predictions of virulence-associated genes, as S. sepilia contains a high number of genes encoding flagella and type IV pili, which are known to be involved in regulating bacterial swimming (Chaban et al., 2015; Nieto et al., 2019). Meanwhile, S. maltophilia has tenacious biofilm formation ability and can form a stable biofilm within 24 hours (Sun et al., 2016; Pompilio et al., 2020). Further biofilm formation ability assays in this study suggested that both S. sepilia and S. maltophilia have a greater ability to survive and colonize surfaces, potentially leading to a competitive advantage (Isom et al., 2022). A ANSELM prospective multicenter study reveals that there is a strong association between high-level biofilm production and invasive infections caused by S. maltophilia (Pompilio et al., 2020). Researches on P. aeruginosa and Escherichia coli have also revealed that strains that cause severe infections exhibit a greater propensity for biofilm formation as compared to those without a pathogenic role (Soto et al., 2007; Mulcahy et al., 2014; Ageorges et al., 2020). These observations imply that there exists a discernible correlation between the organism’s ability to develop biofilms and its level of pathogenicity (Pompilio et al., 2020). It is remarkable that S. sepilia has an unimaginable ability for swimming motility and biofilm formation. Its type strain was isolated from blood cultures of hospitalized patients (Gautam et al., 2021), indicating its underestimated pathogenicity. According to the prevalence analysis, S. sepilia has become the dominant strain in Smc, which deserves more attention.

There is a consensus that S. maltophilia exhibits resistance to a majority of antibiotics, leaving only a limited number of clinically effective drugs available to combat this organism (Gil-Gil et al., 2020; Brooke, 2021). Our study of clinical Smc strains found that these strains exhibited a high sensitivity rate to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and minocycline. This finding is similar to the global overall susceptibility reported in the recent SENTRY study (Gales et al., 2019). However, all 14 S. geniculata strains were found to be resistant to Ceftazidime, and the resistance rate was significantly higher than other species in Smc, but we did not find that S. geniculata has a special genotype for the prediction of resistance genes. This may be an effect due to their complex resistance mechanism, the drug resistance phenotype and genotype of Smc are not always consistent (Wang et al., 2021), and the antibiotic efflux pump system may play an important role (Sánchez and Martínez, 2015).

As above stated, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the population diversity, evolution, and pathogenic characteristics of the understudied pathogen Smc. The 24 species-level clades of SMC vary in geographical distribution and pathogenic potential. Our research indicates that S. geniculata and S. sepilia display worrying phenotypic characteristics related to drug resistance and virulence, respectively, but currently we know very little about these clinical mainstream species of Smc. To better address infections caused by Smc, further studies are required to assess and compare species-specific characteristics related to epidemiology, disease spectrum, resistance, and virulence of species of Smc. Likewise, research is also needed to set out to identify unambiguous molecular targets that could reliably distinguish between these pathogens at the species level. Proper species delimitation is essential for uncovering species-specific phenotypic characteristics and enhancing our understanding of this complex pathogen.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

KL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Validation. KY: Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing. ZH: Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing. XL: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. LM: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. XR: Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. XB: Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing. HG: Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing. ZS: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. XNL: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. DW: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Infrastructure of China (NPRC-32), the establishment of a national Shewanella standard strain (TS202303), the construction of protein fingerprints of rare pathogen (KFYJ-2022-039) and the Operation of Public Health Emergency Response Mechanisms-Infectious Disease Control and Prevention (102393220020020000029).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1325379/full#supplementary-material

References

Adamek, M., Linke, B., Schwartz, T. (2014). Virulence genes in clinical and environmental Stenotrophomas maltophilia isolates: A genome sequencing and gene expression approach. Microb. Pathog. 67–68, 20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2014.02.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ageorges, V., Monteiro, R., Leroy, S., Burgess, C. M., Pizza, M., Chaucheyras-Durand, F., et al. (2020). Molecular determinants of surface colonisation in diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli (DEC): from bacterial adhesion to biofilm formation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 44, 314–350. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuaa008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alcock, B. P., Huynh, W., Chalil, R., Smith, K. W., Raphenya, A. R., Wlodarski, M. A., et al. (2023). CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D690–D699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac920

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bottery, M. J., Matthews, J. L., Wood, A. J., Johansen, H. K., Pitchford, J. W., Friman, V.-P. (2022). Inter-species interactions alter antibiotic efficacy in bacterial communities. ISME J. 16, 812–821. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01130-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brooke, J. S. (2021). Advances in the microbiology of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 34, e00030–e00019. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00030-19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chaban, B., Hughes, H. V., Beeby, M. (2015). The flagellum in bacterial pathogens: For motility and a whole lot more. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 46, 91–103. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.10.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, L., Zou, Y., She, P., Wu, Y. (2015). Composition, function, and regulation of T6SS in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol. Res. 172, 19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2015.01.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2023). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 33rd Edn. [EB/OL], 33rd edition (Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute). Available online at: https://clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/documents/m100/.

Google Scholar

Fast, D., Kostiuk, B., Foley, E., Pukatzki, S. (2018). Commensal pathogen competition impacts host viability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 7099–7104. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802165115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fu, L., Niu, B., Zhu, Z., Wu, S., Li, W. (2012). CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 3150–3152. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gales, A. C., Seifert, H., Gur, D., Castanheira, M., Jones, R. N., Sader, H. S. (2019). Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus–Acinetobacter baumannii Complex and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Clinical Isolates: Results From the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, (1997–2016). Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S34–S46. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy293

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gautam, V., Patil, P. P., Bansal, K., Kumar, S., Kaur, A., Singh, A., et al. (2021). Description of Stenotrophomonas sepilia sp. nov., isolated from blood culture of a hospitalized patient as a new member of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex. New Microbes New Infect. 43, 100920. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2021.100920

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gil-Gil, T., Martínez, J. L., Blanco, P. (2020). Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia : a review of current knowledge. Expert Rev. Anti-infective Ther. 18, 335–347. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1730178

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gröschel, M. I., Meehan, C. J., Barilar, I., Diricks, M., Gonzaga, A., Steglich, M., et al. (2020). The phylogenetic landscape and nosocomial spread of the multidrug-resistant opportunist Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Nat. Commun. 11, 2044. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15123-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gurevich, A., Saveliev, V., Vyahhi, N., Tesler, G. (2013). QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29, 1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, Z., Yu, K., Fu, S., Xiao, Y., Wei, Q., Wang, D. (2022). Genomic analysis reveals high intra-species diversity of Shewanella algae. Microb. Genom. 8, 000786. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000786

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Isom, C. M., Fort, B., Anderson, G. G. (2022). Evaluating metabolic pathways and biofilm formation in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J. Bacteriol 204, e0039821. doi: 10.1128/JB.00398-21

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jain, C., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Phillippy, A. M., Konstantinidis, K. T., Aluru, S. (2018). High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 9, 5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kazmierczak, B. I., Schniederberend, M., Jain, R. (2015). Cross-regulation of Pseudomonas motility systems: the intimate relationship between flagella, pili and virulence. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 28, 78–82. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2015.07.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, S., Bansal, K., Patil, P. P., Kaur, A., Kaur, S., Jaswal, V., et al. (2020). Genomic insights into evolution of extensive drug resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex. Genomics 112, 4171–4178. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.06.049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, D.-H., Cha, J.-H., Kim, D.-W., Lee, K., Kim, Y.-S., Oh, H.-Y., et al. (2022). Colistin-degrading proteases confer collective resistance to microbial communities during polymicrobial infections. Microbiome 10, 129. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01315-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Zhao, A., Yu, Q., Yu, N., Cui, Y., Ma, X., et al. (2023). Effect of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia on tuberculosis. Microbiol. Spectr. 11, e0094423. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00944-23

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z., Lu, X., Wang, D., Liang, W. L., Zhang, J., Li, J., et al. (2019). Genomic comparison of serogroups O159 and O170 with other Vibrio cholerae serogroups. BMC Genomics 20, 241. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5603-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lira, F., Berg, G., Martínez, J. L. (2017). Double-face meets the bacterial world: the opportunistic pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Front. Microbiol. 8. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02190

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, B., Zheng, D., Zhou, S., Chen, L., Yang, J. (2022). VFDB 2022: a general classification scheme for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D912–D917. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mercier-Darty, M., Royer, G., Lamy, B., Charron, C., Lemenand, O., Gomart, C., et al. (2020). Comparative whole-genome phylogeny of animal, environmental, and human strains confirms the genogroup organization and diversity of the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 86, e02919–e02919. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02919-19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Minh, B. Q., Schmidt, H. A., Chernomor, O., Schrempf, D., Woodhams, M. D., von Haeseler, A., et al. (2020). IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1530–1534. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mulcahy, L. R., Isabella, V. M., Lewis, K. (2014). Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in disease. Microb. Ecol. 68, 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s00248-013-0297-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nieto, V., Kroken, A. R., Grosser, M. R., Smith, B. E., Metruccio, M. M. E., Hagan, P., et al. (2019). Type IV Pili can mediate bacterial motility within epithelial cells. mBio 10, e02880–e02818. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02880-18

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ochoa-Sánchez, L. E., Vinuesa, P. (2017). Evolutionary genetic analysis uncovers multiple species with distinct habitat preferences and antibiotic resistance phenotypes in the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex. Front. Microbiol. 8. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01548

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Page, A. J., Cummins, C. A., Hunt, M., Wong, V. K., Reuter, S., Holden, M. T. G., et al. (2015). Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31, 3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palleroni, N. J., Bradbury, J. F. (1993). Stenotrophomonas, a new bacterial genus for Xanthomonas maltophilia (Hugh 1980) Swings et al. 1983. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 43, 606–609. doi: 10.1099/00207713-43-3-606

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Patil, P. P., Kumar, S., Midha, S., Gautam, V., Patil, P. B. (2018). Taxonogenomics reveal multiple novel genomospecies associated with clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Front. Microbiol. 7, 309. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000207

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Patil, P. P., Midha, S., Kumar, S., Patil, P. B. (2016). Genome sequence of type strains of genus Stenotrophomonas. Front. Microbiol. 7, 309. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00309

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pompilio, A., Piccolomini, R., Picciani, C., D’Antonio, D., Savini, V., Di Bonaventura, G. (2008). Factors associated with adherence to and biofilm formation on polystyrene by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: the role of cell surface hydrophobicity and motility. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 287, 41–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01292.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pompilio, A., Ranalli, M., Piccirilli, A., Perilli, M., Vukovic, D., Savic, B., et al. (2020). Biofilm Formation among Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates Has Clinical Relevance: The ANSELM Prospective Multicenter Study. Microorganisms 9, 49. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rhee, J.-Y., Choi, J. Y., Choi, M.-J., Song, J.-H., Peck, K. R., Ko, K. S. (2013). Distinct groups and antimicrobial resistance of clinical Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex isolates from Korea. J. Med. Microbiol. 62, 748–753. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.053355-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sana, T. G., Flaugnatti, N., Lugo, K. A., Lam, L. H., Jacobson, A., Baylot, V., et al. (2016). Salmonella Typhimurium utilizes a T6SS-mediated antibacterial weapon to establish in the host gut. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, E5044–E5051. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608858113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sánchez, M. B., Martínez, J. L. (2015). The efflux pump smeDEF contributes to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 4347–4348. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00714-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seemann, T. (2014). Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, A., Kumar, S., Bansal, K., Patil, P. B. (2023). Taxonomic and phylogenomic assessment identifies phyto-pathogenicity potential of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex. Phytopathology 113, 1833–1838. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-11-22-0434-SC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Soto, S. M., Smithson, A., Martinez, J. A., Horcajada, J. P., Mensa, J., Vila, J. (2007). Biofilm formation in uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains: relationship with prostatitis, urovirulence factors and antimicrobial resistance. J. Urol. 177, 365–368. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.081

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, E., Liang, G., Wang, L., Wei, W., Lei, M., Song, S., et al. (2016). Antimicrobial susceptibility of hospital acquired Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolate biofilms. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 20, 365–373. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2016.04.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., He, T., Shen, Z., Wu, C. (2018). Antimicrobial resistance in Stenotrophomonas spp. Microbiol. Spectr. 6, 6.1.04. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0005-2017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Zhao, J., Ji, F., Chang, H., Qin, J., Zhang, C., et al. (2021). Multiple-replicon resistance plasmids of Klebsiella mediate extensive dissemination of antimicrobial genes. Front. Microbiol. 12. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.754931

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Waters, V., Atenafu, E. G., Lu, A., Yau, Y., Tullis, E., Ratjen, F. (2013). Chronic Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection and mortality or lung transplantation in cystic fibrosis patients. J. Cyst Fibros 12, 482–486. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.12.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Waters, V., Yau, Y., Prasad, S., Lu, A., Atenafu, E., Crandall, I., et al. (2011). Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in cystic fibrosis: serologic response and effect on lung disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 183, 635–640. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201009-1392OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, J., Chen, Y., Cai, G., Cai, R., Hu, Z., Wang, H. (2023). Tree Visualization By One Table (tvBOT): a web application for visualizing, modifying and annotating phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, W587–W592. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad359

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zegadło, K., Gieroń, M., Żarnowiec, P., Durlik-Popińska, K., Kręcisz, B., Kaca, W., et al. (2023). Bacterial motility and its role in skin and wound infections. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 1707. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021707

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, J., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, D., Ni, W., Wang, R., et al. (2018). Frequency and genetic determinants of tigecycline resistance in clinically isolated Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Beijing, China. Front. Microbiol. 9. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00549

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex, evolution, global distribution, pathogenicity, swimming motility, biofilm

Citation: Li K, Yu K, Huang Z, Liu X, Mei L, Ren X, Bai X, Gao H, Sun Z, Liu X and Wang D (2024) Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex: insights into evolutionary relationships, global distribution and pathogenicity. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 13:1325379. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1325379

Received: 21 October 2023; Accepted: 21 December 2023;
Published: 10 January 2024.

Edited by:

Carlos Alberto Moreira-Filho, University of São Paulo, Brazil

Reviewed by:

Ariadnna Cruz-Córdova, Federico Gómez Children’s Hospital, Mexico
Victor Meza Carmen, Michoacana University of San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Mexico

Copyright © 2024 Li, Yu, Huang, Liu, Mei, Ren, Bai, Gao, Sun, Liu and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xiaoning Liu, liuxn@lzu.edu.cn; Duochun Wang, wangduochun@icdc.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.