Streptococcus suis surface-antigen recognition by antibodies and bacterial elimination is influenced by capsular polysaccharide structure

Streptococcus suis is an encapsulated bacterium causing severe diseases in swine. Here, we compared the protective properties of the capsular polysaccharide (CPS) of different S. suis serotypes by using serotype-switched mutants in a mouse model of infection. CPS structure influenced bacterial survival in mice, antibody binding, and antibody-mediated bacterial killing. The CPS of serotypes 3, 4 and 14 allowed more antibody binding and bacterial elimination than the CPS of serotypes 2, 7 and 9. Results suggest that the different CPS structures of S. suis provide varying levels of protection by influencing antigen availability and elimination by the host immune system.

1 Introduction

Streptococcus suis is an important Gram-positive encapsulated bacterium that mainly causes disease in weaned piglets (Gottschalk and Segura, 2019) and is also capable of zoonotic infections (Gottschalk et al., 2010). Pig farms around the globe are considered positive for S. suis as it is a natural inhabitant of the upper respiratory tract of swine (Higgins et al., 2013). In the presence of virulent strains, S. suis infection in pigs can lead to serious life-altering conditions such as septicemia leading to sudden death, meningitis, arthritis and endocarditis (Gottschalk and Segura, 2019). Prompt recognition of early clinical signs related to S. suis infection followed by treatment with appropriate antibiotics maximizes the survival of affected pigs (Gottschalk, 2020). However, prudent usage of antimicrobials is recommended as multiple strains of S. suis presenting antimicrobial resistances have been detected worldwide (Varela et al., 2013; Hadjirin et al., 2021; Uruen et al., 2022) and such strains represent health risks as possible antibiotic resistance reservoirs able to spread resistance genes to other pathogenic streptococci (Palmieri et al., 2011; Uruen et al., 2022). In this light, vaccines have become highly desirable to prevent S. suis infections on the farm and reduce antimicrobial usage. Multiple efforts have been made to develop efficacious vaccines against S. suis, however, there is currently no effective universal vaccine commercially available (Segura, 2015).

An important issue encountered in the development of a universal vaccine is the high genotypic and phenotypic diversity of S. suis isolates. Indeed, there are 29 distinct serotypes of S. suis that are defined by the immunogenicity of the capsular polysaccharide (CPS) that surrounds the bacteria (Okura et al., 2016). Additionally, significant differences within strains of a same serotype of S. suis have been uncovered by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and finally, the distribution of serotypes and sequence types (ST) also highly differs between regions (Goyette-Desjardins et al., 2014) which makes the development of a universal cross-protective vaccine complicated. Most studies aimed to understand the immune response, protective antigens and vaccine development have focused on serotype 2 (Segura, 2015). Regarding the other serotypes of S. suis, studies remain scarce (Rieckmann et al., 2020). In the absence of efficacious commercial vaccines to prevent diseases caused by S. suis, the industry has resorted to the use of autogenous vaccines made by licensed laboratories. Autogenous vaccines are formulated with killed bacteria (bacterins) made from one or many S. suis strains isolated from the farm and are then only administered to the animals of that same farm with the objective to provide protection against the local circulating strains. The few controlled experimental studies on S. suis bacterins have shown contradictory results (Segura, 2015; Corsaut et al., 2020; Rieckmann et al., 2020), and there is no consistent evidence that bacterins providing protection against one serotype could provide protection against other strains and serotypes (Baums et al., 2009).

As there is still a lot of uncertainty regarding the efficacy of S. suis vaccines, more knowledge is needed to achieve better understanding of what influences cross-protection. One bacterial component that could influence such cross-protection would be the CPS that protects S. suis. Indeed, the CPS of S. suis serotype 2 is a known critical virulence factor implicated in many functions such as the impairment of phagocytosis and cytokine release by innate immune cells by masking bacterial surface components, such as proteins (Lecours et al., 2011). The biochemical structure of the CPS can highly differ between S. suis serotypes (Goyette-Desjardins et al., 2020) and differential exposure of cell wall components (mainly proteins) could influence host cell interactions and virulence (Okura et al., 2021). However, it remains unknown if these differences in the CPS between S. suis serotypes can influence the cross-protective potential of antibodies directed against sub-capsular antigens. In this study, serotype-switched mutants of S. suis were used to compare the effect of CPS structures of serotypes 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9 and 14 on antibody production, antibody binding and antibody-induced bacterial elimination. All the mutants possess the same sub-capsular antigens (those of the serotype 2 background) but express different CPS at their surfaces. By using this strategy, only the effect of the CPS on the antibody response against the same sub-capsular antigens was evaluated.

2 Methods

2.1 S. suis strains and growth conditions

The well characterized and highly virulent S. suis serotype 2 P1/7 strain (SS2), originally isolated from a pig with meningitis (Slater et al., 2003), was used along with previously described isogenic serotype-switched mutant strains SS2to3, SS2to4, SS2to7, SS2to8, SS2to9 and SS2to14 that respectively express the CPS of serotypes 3, 4, 7, 8, 9 and 14 (Okura et al., 2021). The serotype-switched mutants functionally possess and express the CPS of the donor serotype, as previously reported (Okura et al., 2021). In addition, a non-encapsulated isogenic mutant strain ΔcpsF was also included in the studies (Lecours et al., 2011). Bacterial culture and preparation were done as previously described (Auger et al., 2018).

2.2 Mouse experimental procedures

A well-standardized C57BL/7 mouse model of infection was used (Lecours et al., 2016). All mouse procedures, including euthanasia according to an established clinical endpoint grid to minimize the suffering of animals seriously affected by infections, were approved by the Animal Welfare Committee of the University of Montreal (Research protocols: Rech-1399 and Rech-1523). Four-week-old mice were acclimatized to laboratory conditions with free access to water and food pellets during a whole week before experiments were carried out. Mice were either injected with a sub-lethal dose of 1 x 10⁶ CFU of live SS2, or its isogenic serotype-switched mutants, by intraperitoneal injection on days 0 and day 14. For each experiment, negative-control mice injected with the matching vehicle solution were included. Mouse tail vein blood samples were taken 24 h post-infection, serially diluted in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.4 and plated on Todd Hewitt Broth (THB, Burlington, ON, Canada) agar plates to determine bacterial blood burden. Serum samples were collected from the submandibular vein on day 14 post-infection and total sera were collected following euthanasia on day 28 post-infection. Serum samples were kept at -80°C for further analysis. Hyperimmunized sera was collected from a separate group of mice that were infected a total of 5 times with SS2 with each infection performed 7 days after the previous one and total sera collected a week after the last infection.

2.3 Titration of S. suis specific antibodies

The titers of anti-S. suis antibodies in infected mouse sera were determined as previously described (Goyette-Desjardins et al., 2020), with Polysorp MicroWell plates (Nunc-Immuno; Canadawide Scientific, Toronto, ON, Canada) coated with a bacterial suspension of whole SS2. In selected experiments, the non-encapsulated isogenic mutant strain ΔcpsF was used as antigen for the coating. Sera collected from mice infected with either SS2 or serotype-switched mutants were serially diluted and added to the wells. Peroxidase-conjugated detection antibodies allowed the detection of IgM or IgG antibody classes. All antibodies and dilutions used are listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1

Table 1 Antibodies used.

2.4 Detection of antibody fixation on live bacteria using an hyperimmune serum against SS2

Detection of antibody fixation on live SS2 and its isogenic mutants SS2to3, SS2to4, SS2to7, SS2to8, SS2to9, SS2to14 and ΔcpsF was performed by flow cytometry. Bacterial suspensions containing 1x10⁶ CFU were distributed in microtubes and centrifuged. Bacterial pellets were resuspended in PBS supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Burlington, ON, Canada) along with 25 µl of SS2-hyperimmunized mouse sera and incubated at 4°C for 30 min. Following washing, pellets were resuspended in PBS-FBS containing anti-IgG-AF647 and incubated at 4°C for 30 min in the dark. Following staining, bacteria were washed, resuspended in PBS and immediately read on a BD LSRFortessa X-20 Cell Analyzer. Data collected was analyzed on FlowJo version 10. More information on the antibody and dilution used is listed in Table 1.

2.5 Antibody-dependent in vitro opsonophagocytosis assay

Antibody bactericidal assays were performed as described previously (Goyette-Desjardins et al., 2015). Briefly, blood from naive mice was mixed with serum collected from either naive mice (used as negative control – no killing observed) or mice infected twice with S. suis SS2 P1/7 strain. Blood-serum preparations were then put in contact with bacterial preparations of S. suis serotype 2 P1/7 strain or the isogenic serotype-switched mutants 2to3, 2to9 and 2to14. Samples were collected after 2 h of incubation to evaluate bacterial killing percentages as described (Goyette-Desjardins et al., 2015). The opsonophagocytosis (OPA) assay using whole blood cells (leukocytes) is considered a better approach than the use of a single cell type to measure antibody-dependent opsonophagocytosis killing of S. suis. OPA assays performed with phagocytic cell lines or purified cell types, underestimate the complexity of blood bactericidal activity (Goyette-Desjardins et al., 2015).

2.6 Statistical analysis

To evaluate statistical differences between two paired groups, parametric data were analyzed using a paired t-test and non-parametric data were analyzed using a Signed rank test. For unpaired groups, parametric data were analyzed using unpaired t-test and non-parametric data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To evaluate statistical differences between three groups or more, parametric data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey Method. Non-parametric data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis One-Way ANOVA followed by Dunn’s Method. A p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Statistical analyses were done using SigmaPlot version 11.0.

3 Results

3.1 Host control of bacterial burden and production of antigen-specific antibodies is affected by the capsular polysaccharide structure of S. suis

Groups of mice were infected with live SS2 or its isogenic serotype-switched mutants (Figure 1A). Monitoring of the bacterial blood burden of mice following the primary and secondary infections indicated that S. suis serotype-switched strains did not share a similar response in vivo (Figure 1B). Following the primary infection, mutants SS2to3, SS2to4, SS2to7 and SS2to9 had significantly lower bacterial blood burden loads than the SS2 strain while mutants SS2to8 and SS2to14 behaved similarly to SS2 wild-type strain. After a secondary infection, only the mutants SS2to3, SS2to4 still presented a significantly lower bacterial blood burden than the parent SS2 strain. In contrast to a primary infection, mutant SS2to14 showed impaired survival in blood after a secondary infection when compared to the parent strain.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1 Bacterial control and antibody production is affected by the capsular polysaccharide structure of Streptococcus suis. Groups of C57BL/6 mice were infected with 1 x 10⁶ CFU doses of live wild-type S. suis serotype 2 strain P1/7 (SS2) or isogenic serotype-switched mutants expressing the capsular polysaccharide of serotypes 3 (SS2to3), 4 (SS2to4), 7 (SS2to7), 8 (SS2to8), 9 (SS2to9) or 14 (SS2to14). (A) Timeline of the experimental infections performed in the different groups of mice along with the bacteremia and sera collection post-infection (P.I.) sampling times. (B) Bacterial blood burden of mice 24 hours after the first (n; SS2 = 10, SS2to3 = 9, SS2to4 = 10, SS2to7 = 9, SS2to8 = 9, SS2to9 = 10 and SS2to14 = 10) and second (n; SS2 = 8, SS2to3 = 8, SS2to4 = 9, SS2to7 = 9, SS2to8 = 8, SS2to9 = 9 and SS2to14 = 9) S. suis infection. Data are represented as individual values with geometric means. (C) Anti-S. suis IgM and IgG titers of sera collected from mice on day 14 (n; Uninfected = 6, SS2 = 8, SS2to3 = 8, SS2to4 = 9, SS2to7 = 9, SS2to8 = 8, SS2to9 = 9 and SS2to14 = 9) and day 28 (n; Uninfected = 6, SS2 = 8, SS2to3 = 8, SS2to4 = 9, SS2to7 = 9, SS2to8 = 8, SS2to9 = 9 and SS2to14 = 9) measured by ELISA. Data are represented as individual values with mean ± SEM. ^#indicated data significantly different (p < 0.05) with the SS2 strain as evaluated by Student’s t-test.

Antibodies specific for S. suis SS2 (used as coating antigen) were evaluated 14 days following the primary and secondary infection (Figure 1C). Following the primary infection, IgM class production was similar between all groups of mice. Levels of anti-S. suis IgG were also similar amongst groups, except for mice infected with the mutant 2to3, which had significantly lower IgG antibody titers than the serotype 2 strain. Following the secondary infection, mice infected with mutants SS2to3, SS2to4, SS2to8 and SS2to14 had significantly lower IgM titers than the serotype 2 strain. For IgG class production, a similar profile was also observed: mutants SS2to3, SS2to4 and SS2to14, but not SS2to8, induced significantly lower levels of IgG than the serotype 2 strain. When the non-encapsulated mutant ΔcpsF was used as whole cell antigen in the ELISA, levels of IgG antibodies were similar than those obtained with wild-type SS2 strain as coating antigen, indicating that detected antibody titers are mostly against the sub-capsular antigens (Supplemental Figure S1).

3.2 The structure of S. suis capsular polysaccharide influences antibody binding and bacterial elimination

Flow cytometry was employed to visualize the levels of IgG class antibodies (from SS2-hyperimmunized mouse sera) able to bind to the cell wall components exposed at the bacterial surface (Figure 2A). As reported (Goyette-Desjardins et al., 2020), the hyperimmunized mouse sera contains mainly anti-proteins antibodies with negligible amounts of anti-CPS2 antibodies of the IgG class. Therefore, the assay detects IgG binding to the sub-capsular antigens of the different strains. Results showed that antibody binding was indeed influenced by the structure of the CPS. Mutants SS2to3, SS2to4, SS2to14 and the unencapsulated mutant ΔcpsF (used as control) bound significantly more IgGs than the SS2 strain. In contrast, mutants SS2to7 and SS2to9 showed significantly less bound IgGs. An OPA in vivo assay was used to evaluate antibody-mediated bacterial killing (Figure 2B). Results indicated that bacterial killing was affected by the structure of the CPS. As expected, sera of mice immunized twice with SS2 showed high killing percentages against a homologous challenge with the SS2 strain (used as control for the OPA test). Mutants SS2to14 (high IgG binding), SS2to3 (moderate IgG binding), and SS2to9 (low IgG binding) were selected for OPA analysis. Results showed that mutants SS2to3 and SS2to14 had equivalent killing percentages that were significantly higher than those of the SS2to9 mutant.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2 The structure of Streptococcus suis capsular polysaccharide influences antibody binding and bacterial elimination. The function of anti-S. suis antibodies in the sera of uninfected mice or mice hyperimmunized with S. suis were evaluated by flow cytometry and opsonophagocytosis killing assay (OPA). Binding of antibodies to S. suis serotype 2 strain P1/7 (SS2) or its isogenic mutants (SS2to3, SS2to4, SS2to7, SS2to8, SS2to9, SS2to14 and ΔcpsF) was evaluated by flow cytometry. (A) IgG Geo MFI (geometric mean fluorescence intensity) of different bacteria strains and mutants (n; SS2 = 6, SS2to3 = 6, SS2to4 = 6, SS2to7 = 6, SS2to8 = 6, SS2to9 = 6, SS2to14 = 6 and ΔcpsF = 6). Data are represented as individual geometric mean fluorescence intensity (Geo MFI) reads with mean. (B) Mouse serum-induced opsonophagocytosis killing of S. suis, evaluated by OPA for S. suis serotype 2 strain P1/7 (SS2) and isogenic serotype-switched mutants SS2to3, SS2to9 and SS2to14 (n; SS2 = 3, SS2to3 = 3, SS2to9 = 3 and SS2to14 = 3). Data are represented as individual values along with mean ± SEM. ^#Indicated data significantly different (p < 0.05) with the SS2 strain as evaluated by Student’s t-test.

4 Discussion

The biochemical composition of the CPS that surrounds S. suis is known to be widely different between serotypes (Goyette-Desjardins et al., 2020). Our leading hypothesis was that these different CPS structures could differently influence the establishment and role of the antibody response against sub-capsular antigens (cell wall components). Strains expressing the CPS of serotypes 3 and 4 had markedly impaired survival in murine and porcine whole blood (Okura et al., 2021) and showed increased susceptibility to host defenses as they were more significantly eliminated than the parent SS2 strain during primary and secondary infections in mice. Albeit less pronounced, reduced blood bacterial burdens were also observed after primary infection with strains SS2to7 and SS2to9 in our mouse infection model (sub-lethal infection dose). However, the difference in bacteremia levels between these mutants and the parent SS2 strain was lost after a secondary infection and not noticeable in a high-dose mouse infection model (Okura et al., 2021). Altogether, these observations suggest that CPS structures of serotype 7 and 9 provides a similar protection against host defenses than that of CPS serotype 2. Interestingly, mutant SS2to14 behaves similarly than the parent strain SS2 after primary infection, as also reported in the high-dose mouse infection model (Okura et al., 2021). However, the capacity of this mutant to multiply in blood after a secondary infection was significantly impaired. This prompted us to evaluate the adaptive humoral response generated during infection, which has been known to be of importance for S. suis elimination (Holt et al., 1989; Blouin et al., 1994). Production of antibodies following a primary infection with S. suis was not affected by CPS structure, except for IgG production in mice infected with the CPS 3 mutant. We hypothesized that the quick elimination of the SS2to3 mutant in vivo (compared to SS2 and other serotype-switched mutants) might have reduced the quantity of bacterial antigens available to activate B cells and drive optimal IgG production. However, no clear correlation was found between IgG titers and bacterial blood burden (data not shown), although it is possible that the relatively low number of subjects used (n = 8-9) limited this analysis. Antibody production profiles were slightly different after the secondary infection where mice infected with CPS 3, 4 and 14 mutants had a significant reduction in anti-SS2 IgM and IgG production compared to the SS2 strain, which could again be attributed to less antigens available.

Protection from antibodies might be influenced by CPS structure as the CPS 14 mutant was significantly more eliminated in the presence of antibodies than the parent SS2 strain during a secondary infection. This observation came off as a surprise since mice infected with CPS 14 shared the same levels of antibodies against the bacteria than other strains after a primary infection (day 14). Enhanced elimination could be due to anti-CPS antibodies; however, anti-CPS titers are practically absent in animals infected with serotype 14 strains (Calzas et al., 2017). This observation led to the hypothesis that the different CPS structures might influence the ability of antibodies to bind to cell wall components exposed at the bacterial surface, which could then enable elimination by immune cells.

Flow cytometry experiments revealed that CPS 3, 4 and 14 mutants bound more IgG antibodies than the SS2 strain. This finding goes in hand with previous evidence that CPS 3, 4 and 14 mutants were more eliminated in vivo and would suggest that these CPS structures, and notably that of serotype 14, are more permeable to antibodies. On the other hand, CPS 7 and 9 conferred more protection against IgG binding than the parental CPS 2, which might explain the capacity of these strains to reach bacteremia levels similar to SS2 after the secondary infection. Taken together, these observations suggest that the different CPS structures of S. suis have different antigen masking properties, which could affect survival against the humoral response.

A controlled in vitro OPA using sera from mice infected with parent SS2 strain confirmed that the CPS structure could influence protection against antibodies directed against sub-capsular antigens. Since the serum used in the OPA was generated against SS2, any reaction with the serotype-switched mutants (expressing a different CPS) would be mainly directed against proteins. CPS mutants 3 and 14 were susceptible to antibody-mediated killing while the CPS 9 mutant showed resistance, indicating that CPS structures influence antigen availability and antibody detection which in turn influences bacterial elimination. It is worth mentioning that SS2 strain was significantly more eliminated than any of the tested strains in our OPA assay. This is because the sera used for all OPA trials was collected from a group of mice infected twice with the homologous SS2 strain and was positive for anti-CPS2 IgMs which are potent antibodies known to be able to induce high levels of opsonophagocytosis killing (Goyette-Desjardins et al., 2019). However, in the absence of specific anti-CPS IgMs, antibody-dependent phagocytosis (directed against sub-capsular antigens) of the mutant strains is affected by the CPS expressed at the bacterial surface.

The evidence gathered in this study indicates that the structural differences of S. suis CPS does influence the development and the role of the antibody response. Of the tested serotypes, the CPS of serotypes 2, 7, 8 and 9 provided better protection while the CPS of serotypes 3, 4 and 14 provided the weakest defense. It could be hypothesized that a more efficacious CPS structure would permit strains to persist in the host and cause disease more easily. This could help explain the overwhelming presence of serotype 2 strains in both pig and human cases world-wide (Goyette-Desjardins et al., 2014), and the rising incidence of serotype 9 strains, which are particularly virulent in European farms (Segura et al., 2020). However, serotype 3 strains are highly prevalent in the USA (Goyette-Desjardins et al., 2014) despite being equipped with a CPS that does not offer optimal protection and is also considered ‘‘highly’’ immunogenic (Goyette-Desjardins et al., 2020). Taking this into account, the ability of the CPS structure to influence antibody development and role is thus not solely responsible for virulence. Indeed, strain dependent differences can be observed within a same serotype (Auger et al., 2018) suggesting that other bacterial components might also play an important role in virulence.

There are currently over 60 published studies on S. suis vaccine candidates catalogued by PubMed, with some studies reporting efficacy against specific strains of S. suis. However, multiple serotypes of S. suis are present in herds (Reams et al., 1996) and mixed infections caused by different serotypes have been reported (Johannson, 2006). In this light, it would be ideal to develop a ‘‘universal’’ cell-surface protein vaccine that offers cross-protection against multiple strains and serotypes of S. suis. However, the results obtained in this study suggest that obtaining cross-protection might be more difficult than originally thought. Indeed, an “universal’’ vaccine made with highly conserved antigens shared between most serotypes and strains of S. suis could elicit strong antibody responses against said antigens but still fail to provide protection (Dumesnil et al., 2019; Weisse et al., 2021), probably due to the fact that CPS structures provide different levels of antigen masking and protection. As an indicator, autovaccines for S. suis serotype 9 have been found to be less efficacious than ones developed against the serotype 2 (Segura et al., 2020), which could be due to the higher level of bacterial protection conferred by the serotype 9 CPS. This study is the first experimental report that directly compares the influence of the CPS structure from multiple serotypes of S. suis on antibody production, antibody binding and antibody-induced bacterial killing. The results obtained indicate that CPS structure plays an important role in antigen availability and bacterial elimination, a finding of importance for vaccine development. Indeed, when anti-CPS specific antibodies are absent, the IgG anti-protein response would have a variable role depending on the capsular serotype of the strain. This study identifies the CPS of serotypes 2, 7, 8 and 9 as a potential high-risk since those CPS confer higher levels of protection against antibodies. Overall, this study highlights the need to closely monitor cross-protection when designing S. suis vaccines.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by Animal Welfare Committee of the University of Montreal.

Author contributions

DD and MS conceived the study. DD and ML performed all animal infections and sampling. DD analyzed the animal data. DD performed the ELISA and OPA experiments. ML performed the FACS experiments and DD analyzed the FACS data. DD performed statistical analyses. DD prepared tables and figures. DD and MS interpreted the data. DD and MS wrote the paper. MO and DT provided the mutants. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was mainly supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through grants to MS (no. 342150) and to MG (no. 04435). DD is the recipient of a Fonds de Recherche du Québec–Nature et Technologies (FRQ-NT) Doctoral Research Scholarship (#268339) and the recipient of a Swine and Poultry Infectious Disease Research Center (CRIPA) scholarship supported by the FRQNT (#RS-170946). MS is a holder of a Canada Research Chair – Tier 1.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Marie-Christine Giroux for technical assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1228496/full#supplementary-material

References

Auger, J. P., Dolbec, D., Roy, D., Segura, M., Gottschalk, M. (2018). Role of the Streptococcus suis serotype 2 capsular polysaccharide in the interactions with dendritic cells is strain-dependent but remains critical for virulence. PloS One 13, e0200453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200453

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baums, C. G., Kock, C., Beineke, A., Bennecke, K., Goethe, R., Schroder, C., et al. (2009). Streptococcus suis bacterin and subunit vaccine immunogenicities and protective efficacies against serotypes 2 and 9. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 16, 200–208. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00371-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blouin, C., Higgins, R., Gottschalk, M., Simard, J. (1994). Evaluation of the antibody response in pigs vaccinated against Streptococcus suis capsular type 2 using a double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Can. J. Vet. Res. 58, 49–54.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Calzas, C., Taillardet, M., Fourati, I. S., Roy, D., Gottschalk, M., Soudeyns, H., et al. (2017). Evaluation of the immunomodulatory properties of Streptococcus suis and group B Streptococcus capsular polysaccharides on the humoral response. Pathogens 6. doi: 10.3390/pathogens6020016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Corsaut, L., Misener, M., Canning, P., Beauchamp, G., Gottschalk, M., Segura, M. (2020). Field study on the immunological response and protective effect of a licensed autogenous vaccine to control Streptococcus suis infections in post-weaned piglets. Vaccines (Basel) 8. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8030384

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dumesnil, A., Martelet, L., Grenier, D., Auger, J. P., Harel, J., Nadeau, E., et al. (2019). Enolase and dipeptidyl peptidase IV protein sub-unit vaccines are not protective against a lethal Streptococcus suis serotype 2 challenge in a mouse model of infection. BMC Vet. Res. 15, 448. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2196-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gottschalk, M. (2020). Streptococcus suis Infection in Pigs. Available at: https://www.merckvetmanual.com/generalized-conditions/streptococcal-infections-in-pigs/streptococcus-suis-infection-in-pigs (Accessed 29 Nov 2022).

Google Scholar

Gottschalk, M., Segura, M. (2019). “Streptococcosis,” in Diseases of swine (USA: Wiley Blackwell).

Google Scholar

Gottschalk, M., Xu, J., Calzas, C., Segura, M. (2010). Streptococcus suis: a new emerging or an old neglected zoonotic pathogen? Future Microbiol. 5, 371–391. doi: 10.2217/fmb.10.2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goyette-Desjardins, G., Auger, J. P., Dolbec, D., Vinogradov, E., Okura, M., Takamatsu, D., et al. (2020). Comparative study of immunogenic properties of purified capsular polysaccharides from Streptococcus suis serotypes 3, 7, 8, and 9: the serotype 3 polysaccharide induces an opsonizing IgG response. Infect. Immun. 88. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00377-20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goyette-Desjardins, G., Auger, J. P., Xu, J., Segura, M., Gottschalk, M. (2014). Streptococcus suis, an important pig pathogen and emerging zoonotic agent-an update on the worldwide distribution based on serotyping and sequence typing. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 3, e45. doi: 10.1038/emi.2014.45

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goyette-Desjardins, G., Lacouture, S., Auger, J. P., Roy, R., Gottschalk, M., Segura, M. (2019). Characterization and Protective Activity of Monoclonal Antibodies Directed against Streptococcus suis Serotype 2 Capsular Polysaccharide Obtained Using a Glycoconjugate. Pathogens 8. doi: 10.3390/pathogens8030139

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goyette-Desjardins, G., Roy, R., Segura, M. (2015). “Murine whole-blood opsonophagocytosis assay to evaluate protection by antibodies raised against encapsulated extracellular bacteria,” in Carbohydrate-Based Vaccines: Methods and Protocols. Ed. Lepenies, B. (New York, NY: Springer New York).

Google Scholar

Hadjirin, N. F., Miller, E. L., Murray, G. G. R., Yen, P. L. K., Phuc, H. D., Wileman, T. M., et al. (2021). Large-scale genomic analysis of antimicrobial resistance in the zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis. BMC Biol. 19, 191. doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01094-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Higgins, R., Gottschalk, M., Straw, B. E., Zimmerman, J. J., D'allaire, S., Taylor, D. J. (2013). “Streptococcal diseases,” in Diseases of swine (USA: John Wiley & Sons).

Google Scholar

Holt, M. E., Enright, M. R., Alexander, T. J. (1989). Studies of the protective effect of different fractions of sera from pigs immune to Streptococcus suis type 2 infection. J. Comp. Pathol. 100, 435–442. doi: 10.1016/0021-9975(89)90009-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johannson, L. M. (2006). Meningitis and Septicemia in a 7-week-old piglet caused by dual streptococcal infection. Can. Vet. J. 47, 796–798.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Lecours, M. P., Gottschalk, M., Houde, M., Lemire, P., Fittipaldi, N., Segura, M. (2011). Critical role for Streptococcus suis cell wall modifications and suilysin in resistance to complement-dependent killing by dendritic cells. J. Infect. Dis. 204, 919–929. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir415

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lecours, M.-P., Letendre, C., Clarke, D., Lemire, P., Galbas, T., Benoit-Biancamano, M.-O., et al. (2016). Immune-responsiveness of CD4+ T cells during Streptococcus suis serotype 2 infection. Sci. Rep. 6, 38061. doi: 10.1038/srep38061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Okura, M., Auger, J. P., Shibahara, T., Goyette-Desjardins, G., Van Calsteren, M. R., Maruyama, F., et al. (2021). Capsular polysaccharide switching in Streptococcus suis modulates host cell interactions and virulence. Sci. Rep. 11, 6513. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85882-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Okura, M., Osaki, M., Nomoto, R., Arai, S., Osawa, R., Sekizaki, T., et al. (2016). Current taxonomical situation of Streptococcus suis. Pathogens 5. doi: 10.3390/pathogens5030045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palmieri, C., Varaldo, P. E., Facinelli, B. (2011). Streptococcus suis, an emerging drug-resistant animal and human pathogen. Front. Microbiol. 2, 235. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00235

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reams, R. Y., Harrington, D. D., Glickman, L. T., Thacker, H. L., Bowersock, T. L. (1996). Multiple serotypes and strains of Streptococcus suis in naturally infected swine herds. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 8, 119–121. doi: 10.1177/104063879600800121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rieckmann, K., Pendzialek, S. M., Vahlenkamp, T., Baums, C. G. (2020). A critical review speculating on the protective efficacies of autogenous Streptococcus suis bacterins as used in Europe. Porcine Health Manag. 6, 12. doi: 10.1186/s40813-020-00150-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Segura, M. (2015). Streptococcus suis vaccines: candidate antigens and progress. Expert Rev. Vaccines 14, 1587–1608. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2015.1101349

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Segura, M., Aragon, V., Brockmeier, S. L., Gebhart, C., Greeff, A., Kerdsin, A., et al. (2020). Update on Streptococcus suis research and prevention in the era of antimicrobial restriction: 4th international workshop on S. suis. Pathogens 9. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9050374

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Slater, J. D., Allen, A. G., May, J. P., Bolitho, S., Lindsay, H., Maskell, D. J. (2003). Mutagenesis of Streptococcus equi and Streptococcus suis by transposon Tn917. Vet. Microbiol. 93, 197–206. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(03)00030-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Uruen, C., Garcia, C., Fraile, L., Tommassen, J., Arenas, J. (2022). How Streptococcus suis escapes antibiotic treatments. Vet. Res. 53, 91. doi: 10.1186/s13567-022-01111-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Varela, N. P., Gadbois, P., Thibault, C., Gottschalk, M., Dick, P., Wilson, J. (2013). Antimicrobial resistance and prudent drug use for Streptococcus suis. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 14, 68–77. doi: 10.1017/S1466252313000029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weisse, C., Dittmar, D., Jakobczak, B., Florian, V., Schutze, N., Alber, G., et al. (2021). Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a Streptococcus suis vaccine composed of six conserved immunogens. Vet. Res. 52, 112. doi: 10.1186/s13567-021-00981-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar