- 1Laboratory of Bacteriology, Butantan Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
- 2Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- 3Chula Vaccine Research Center (Chula VRC), Center of Excellence in Vaccine Research and Development, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- 4Department of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Editorial on the Research Topic
Leptospirosis: pathogenesis, clinical and epidemiological aspects
Leptospirosis is an infectious disease of worldwide distribution caused by pathogenic species of the genus Leptospira. The disease affects domestic and wild animals as well as humans, and each year approximately one million new cases of leptospirosis are notified globally, among which 5-10% progress to death (Costa et al., 2015). Developing a deeper understanding of the general mechanisms of Leptospira pathogenesis will certainly lead to advances on new diagnostic tools, prevention and treatment of this infectious disease.
This compilation of research and review articles provides updates on bacterial pathogenesis and immune responses, and approaches aspects related to vaccine development against leptospirosis, including new candidates and adjuvant formulations. Those studies may shed light on Leptospira pathogenesis at the molecular and physiological level, and impact on the treatment of this neglected infectious disease.
A short-term murine model that allows hematogenous dissemination of both pathogenic and non-pathogenic Leptospira was developed by Surdel et al. C3H/HeJ mice were inoculated intravenously, and tissues were harvested 24 hours post-infection. Interestingly, non-pathogenic L. biflexa serovar Patoc were isolated from multiple organs by qPCR, but showed lower burdens compared to the pathogenic L. interrogans serovar Manilae strain. Furthermore, non-pathogenic leptospires were detected for at least six hours post infection in the blood. This model can be useful to uncover novel virulence determinants involved in host colonization and immune evasion, having the benefit of allowing the use of both loss- and gain-of-function bacterial strains.
Taking advantage of this infection model, Surdel et al. assessed the in vivo role of the candidate adhesins LIC11574 and LIC13411, previously shown to bind to VE-cadherin in vitro (Evangelista et al., 2014a; Evangelista et al., 2014b). Heterologous production of LIC13411 in non-pathogenic L. biflexa increased binding of this saprophytic strain to human endothelial cells and specifically to VE-cadherin. In the short-term murine model of infection this gain-of-function strain showed increased burdens in multiple organs. Thus, tharapies targeting Leptospira adhesins may be an efficient way to prevent or limit infection by this spirochete.
The importance for searching new vaccine candidates against leptospirosis and the limits of using hamsters as an experimental model were highlighted in the study by Maia et al. The authors used 22 vaccine candidates selected by reverse vaccinology and immunized a relatively large number of hamsters before challenge with pathogenic L. interrogans Fiocruz L1-130. In two large experiments, the immunization with the recombinant proteins LIC11570, LIC13229, LIC13417 and LIC20214 conferred 100% protection, sterilizing immunity, and significant specific IgG production. However, these promising results were not reproduced in the third experiment. The authors suggest that future studies employ C3H/HeJ mice, since these animals are quite susceptible to leptospirosis: they are Toll-like receptor-4 deficient and therefore would not respond to the possible presence of E. coli LPS in the recombinant protein preparations. In addition, there is a larger repertoire of commercial reagents that can be used to characterize the mouse immune response against Leptospira during vaccination.
Novel, promising vaccine candidates against leptospirosis were reported by Chaurasia et al.: the PF07598 Gene Family-Encoded Virulence Modifying Proteins (VM proteins). Those secreted toxins were previously shown to promote cytotoxicity in vitro (Chaurasia et al., 2022). C3H/HeJ mice immunized with recombinant VM proteins and challenged with L.interrogans serovar Canicola were protected and had a significant reduction in bacterial load in the liver and kidney. These data pave the way for the development of a pan-leptospirosis subunit vaccine.
Adjuvants are being studied to enhance the efficacy of subunit vaccines to provide complete protection against leptospirosis. The LMQ (neutral liposomes containing monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) and Quillaja saponaria derived QS21 saponin) adjuvant has previously been shown to be an effective adjuvant for the C-terminal region (domain 7-13) of leptospiral immunoglobulin-like protein A (LigAc) (Techawiwattanaboon et al., 2020), one of the most promising vaccine candidates. The study by Techawiwattanaboon et al. evaluated the effectiveness of three alternative adjuvants (LQ, LQuil, and SQuil) in promoting immunogenicity and protective efficacy. Results indicate that these adjuvants confer substantial antibody responses and protective efficacy comparable to the LMQ adjuvant, indicating their potential for improving human and animal leptospirosis vaccines.
The role of secreted proteins in the pathogenesis of Leptospira is still an unexplored area. Courrol et al. characterized L. interrogans leptolysin, a secreted metalloprotease that targets proteinaceous substrates such as proteoglycans and plasma fibronectin. Leptolysin is highly conserved among Leptospira species belonging to the subclade P1. Its broad-spectrum proteolytic activity substantiates future in vivo studies that may provide further evidence of the involvement of this protease in the pathogenesis of leptospirosis through inactivation of host proteins.
Leptospires, known as extracellular bacteria, have been a subject of controversy regarding their ability to replicate within macrophages. Santecchia et al. demonstrated that murine macrophages can internalize pathogenic leptospires in vivo. Human (PMA-differentiated) THP1 and mouse RAW264.7 macrophage cell lines were actively infected by three different serotypes of pathogenic L. interrogans and the saprophytic L. biflexa. However, the observed reduction in the intracellular load was not attributed to classical macrophage microbicidal mechanisms, but rather to an active exit of the bacteria. These findings indicate that leptospires do not exhibit an intracellular lifestyle in macrophages.
The mechanisms underlying mammalian susceptibility to leptospirosis remain poorly understood. Bonhomme et al. review recent research that suggests leptospires can avoid recognition by certain Toll-like and NOD-like receptors, including TLR4, TLR5, and NOD1, in various hosts, while TLR2 and NLRP3 responses are consistently observed across hosts. It is proposed that the innate immune mechanisms, particularly TLR4, could potentially determine susceptibility to leptospirosis in various hosts.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Chaurasia, R., Marroquin, A., Vinetz, J., Matthias, M. (2022). Pathogenic Leptospira evolved a unique gene family comprised of ricin b-like lectin domain-containing cytotoxins. Front. Microbiol. 13. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.859680
Costa, F., Hagan, J. E., Calcagno, J., Kane, M., Torgerson, P., Martinez-Silveira, M. S., et al. (2015). Global morbidity and mortality of leptospirosis: a systematic review. PloS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9, e0003898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003898
Evangelista, K., Franco, R., Schwab, A., Coburn, J. (2014a). Leptospira interrogans binds to cadherins. PloS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8 (1), e2672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002672
Evangelista, K. V., Hahn, B., Wunder, E. A., Jr., Ko, A. I., Haake, D. A., Coburn, J. (2014b). Identification of cell-binding adhesins of Leptospira interrogans. PloS negl. Trop. Dis. 8 (10), e3215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003215
Techawiwattanaboon, T., Barnier-Quer, C., Palaga, T., Jacquet, A., Collin, N., Sangjun, N., et al. (2020). A comparison of intramuscular and subcutaneous administration of LigA subunit vaccine adjuvanted with neutral liposomal formulation containing monophosphoryl lipid a and QS21. Vaccines 3), 494. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8030494
Keywords: leptospirosis, Leptospira, pathogenesis, immune response, vaccines
Citation: Barbosa AS, Patarakul K and Isaac L (2023) Editorial: Leptospirosis: pathogenesis, clinical and epidemiological aspects. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 13:1210178. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1210178
Received: 21 April 2023; Accepted: 02 May 2023;
Published: 09 May 2023.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Alain Filloux, Imperial College London, United KingdomCopyright © 2023 Barbosa, Patarakul and Isaac. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Angela S. Barbosa, angela.barbosa@butantan.gov.br; Kanitha Patarakul, kanitha.pa@chula.ac.th; Lourdes Isaac, louisaac@icb.usp.br