Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 21 April 2023
Sec. Bacteria and Host
This article is part of the Research Topic Single Cell Analysis of Bacteria-Host Interaction View all 7 articles

Editorial: Single cell analysis of bacteria-host interaction

  • 1Laboratory of Infection Biology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czechia
  • 2Department of Infectious Diseases, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
  • 3Department of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

Multicellular organisms are very complex systems. This complexity is further increased by their interaction(s) with microbes. Recent technological advances have allowed us to study the interactions inside these complex systems at the single-cell level. This has revealed remarkable heterogeneity of both host and microbial cells, as well as heterogeneity in their interactions. The heterogeneity of interactions between host cells and isogenic bacteria has a large impact on the outcome of host-bacteria interactions.

Our Research Topic focused on the heterogeneity of bacteria-host interaction and consists of six published articles by 32 co-authors with an acceptance rate of approximately 50%.

The interaction between individual host cells and the local microbiome was studied by Li et al. who examined the influence of saliva on the composition of the oral microbiota. First, the authors compared the composition of oral microbiota in mice with excised submandibular or sublingual glands with control animals. The treatment led to a significant increase in Lactobacilli in the operated mice, with a stronger effect noticed following submandibular gland removal. The authors further examined the protein composition of individual glands and identified that submandibular glands produce more immune-related proteins than sublingual glands. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis of cells from individual glands identified specific cell types responsible for the production of proteins identified by the proteomic approach. This study shed some light on the influence of individual host cells on the composition of the oral microbiota.

Gu et al. focused on the influence of a bacterial toxin on individual host cells. The authors used flow cytometry and microscopy techniques to study the influence of Campylobacter jejuni Cytolethal Distending Toxin (CDT) on the induction of apoptosis in human colon cells. The authors showed high variability in host DNA damage between individual host cells exposed to CDT-containing bacterial lysate. After confirming the cytotoxicity of CDT in their experimental model, the authors identified the Caspase-9/caspase-3/gasdermin E as the executive axis in CDT-induced pyroptosis. Finally, the authors indicated the role of reactive oxygen species in the CDT mechanism of action.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has been used before to study bacteria in great detail. Schulte et al. used TEM in combination with other microscopy techniques to examine morphotypes of individual viable pathogenic bacteria Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Using sample post-contrasting with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, the authors described two morphotypes of bacteria differing in cytoplasmic protein density, which they argued was caused by oxidative stress. Both morphotypes of bacteria were also found inside host cells and showed marks of proliferation. Similarly, the same proportion of both morphotypes was found to be metabolically active. Eventually, a third morphotype was discovered with a dense layer surrounding loose materials in the center. The authors correlated the appearance of bacteria with this “halo-shaped” morphotype with critical environmental conditions in which “the DNA needs to be shielded and protected”. Thus, using single-cell approaches, Schulte et al. provide experimental evidence of a heterogeneous morphological response of individual bacteria to environmental conditions.

Luk et al. reviewed the differences and similarities of Salmonella intracellular lifestyles in epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and macrophages. The authors also concentrated on differences between particular cell lines used as models for each category of cells permissive for Salmonella intracellular survival. Special interest was given to the escape of Salmonella from Salmonella-containing vacuoles, the detection of escaped bacteria and their targeting for autophagy, and the hyper-replication of bacteria in the cytosol of epithelial cells. In contrast, cytosolic Salmonella does not hyper-proliferate in the cytosol of fibroblasts or immune cells. In addition, the authors described how the activation of caspase pathways by cytosolic Salmonella, which leads to host cell death, also differs between epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and immune cells. Another important topic discussed by the authors was the induction of persisters inside different types of host cells.

Persisters were reviewed in more detail by Personnic et al. who chose Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enterica, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Legionella pneumophila as model organisms to describe the mechanisms that induce the formation of persisters in the host. The authors further described how persisters modulate their metabolic and defensive processes to be able to survive prolonged host attacks and how the persisters fight back to inhibit host bactericidal activities. The illustration of different bacterial persister states and host cell functional states underscore the complexity of the covered topic.

Fernández-Fernández et al. reviewed the use of state-of-the-art cell sorting approaches to study Salmonella heterogeneity. The authors first introduced the concept of cell sorting and the different types of cell separation methods, including immunomagnetic cell sorting (MACS) and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Then, the authors described how these cell separation methods can be applied to investigate bacterial heterogeneity during different types of bacteria-host interactions. The authors also described how cell separation methods can be applied to study the exposure to biocides, the purification of bacterial cell envelopes, and the study of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics and gene expression. From this review article, it becomes clear that the use of cell sorting has lots of potential to explore key aspects of bacterial physiology that classic microbiology methods (that work at the whole population level) cannot address.

In summary, the articles on this Research Topic brought together interesting observations on interactions between individual host cells and individual bacteria and summarized current knowledge on current technological development as well as on the heterogeneity of bacterial lifestyles upon interaction with the host.

Author contributions

OC and DL-M conceived and wrote the editorial. CG reviewed and approved the final version.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to all reviewers who enabled the publication of the articles on this Research Topic.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: single cell analysis, bacteria-host interaction, cellular microbiology, pathogens, microbiota, flow cytometry, microscopy

Citation: Cerny O, Godlee C and Lobato-Márquez D (2023) Editorial: Single cell analysis of bacteria-host interaction. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 13:1196905. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1196905

Received: 30 March 2023; Accepted: 03 April 2023;
Published: 21 April 2023.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Thomas Rudel, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Germany

Copyright © 2023 Cerny, Godlee and Lobato-Márquez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ondrej Cerny, b25kcmVqLmNlcm55QGJpb21lZC5jYXMuY3o=

Present address: Damián Lobato-Márquez, Department of Microbial Biotechnology, National Center of Biotechnology, CSIC, Madrid, Spain

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.