- 1School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- 3Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical Center Hospital of Qionglai City, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- 4College of Medical Technology, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
Objective: To analyze the mortality rate of patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia (KPB) and the impact of extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing or carbapenem-resistance (CR) KP on the mortality rate among patients with bacteremia.
Methods: EMbase, Web of Science, PubMed, and The Cochrane Library were searched up to September 18th, 2022. Two reviewers independently extracted data and evaluated risk of bias of included studies by ROBINS-I tool. A meta-regression analysis was conducted using a mixed-effects model to explore possible sources of heterogeneity. A random-effects model was used for pooled analysis in case of significant heterogeneity (I2>50%). Otherwise, the fixed-effects model was performed.
Results: A total of 157 studies (37,915 enrolled patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled death proportions of KPB were 17% (95% CI=0.14-0.20) at 7-day, 24% (95% CI=0.21-0.28) at 14-day, 29% (95% CI=0.26-0.31) at 30-day, 34% (95% CI=0.26-0.42) at 90-day, and 29% (95% CI=0.26-0.33) in hospital, respectively. Heterogeneity was found from the intensive care unit (ICU), hospital-acquired (HA), CRKP, and ESBL-KP in the meta-regression analysis. More than 50% of ICU, HA, CRKP, and ESBL-KP were associated with a significant higher 30-day mortality rates. The pooled mortality odds ratios (ORs) of CRKP vs. non-CRKP were 3.22 (95% CI 1.18-8.76) at 7-day, 5.66 (95% CI 4.31-7.42) at 14-day, 3.87 (95% CI 3.01-3.49) at 28- or 30-day, and 4.05 (95% CI 3.38-4.85) in hospital, respectively.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicated that patients with KPB in ICU, HA-KPB, CRKP, and ESBL-KP bacteremia were associated with a higher mortality rate. The high mortality rate caused by CRKP bacteremia has increased over time, challenging the public health.
Introduction
Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) is well known as an opportunistic pathogen which can cause invasive human infections such as bacteremia. Also, KP is the second most common cause of gram-negative bacteremia, following Escherichia coli (E. coli) (Cubero et al., 2018; Hyun et al., 2018). The estimated incidence rate of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia (KPB) was increased from 10.2 to 18.7 per 100 000 inhabitants in a region of Canada (Pépin et al., 2010), and the reported mortality rate of KPB varied widely from 11% to 81% in most studies (Chang et al., 2015; Imai et al., 2019; Reid et al., 2019; Falcone et al., 2020; Balkan et al., 2021; Meng et al., 2022). It is important to accurately estimate the mortality rate of KPB to best define the infectious disease, and it can accurately convey prognosis and improve the guidance to control this disease.
Antibiotic resistance has become a major challenge for public health globally, which is associated with nearly 5 million deaths and killed at least 1.27 million people worldwide in 2019 alone (CDC, 2022). In addition, the cost to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens is high, making a big healthcare burden to society (Zhen et al., 2021). ESBL-producing germs cost the highest for community-onset and hospital-onset infections, with an estimated more than $1.2 billion (Nelson et al., 2021). Antibiotic resistance can develop in KP isolates, especially producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) and carbapenemases. Although many studies (including guidelines) were adopted to maintain the progress in combating antimicrobial resistance, the prevalence of ESBL- and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) has increased dramatically (Gao et al., 2020). According to the 20 Years of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (Castanheira et al., 2019), a significant increase in CRKP strains was noted over time. Most studies reported patients with ESBL-producing or CRKP bacteremia were associated with higher mortality rate when compared with those who had non-ESBL or non-CRKP bacteremia (Lee et al., 2012; Li et al., 2014; Li and Huang, 2017; Xiao et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2019; Shen et al., 2020; Meng et al., 2022). However, some other researchers reported contrary or similar mortality rates (Lee et al., 2011; Pau et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2021). Therefore, conducting accurate estimation of the mortality gap between CRKP and non-CRKP bloodstream infections is needed.
Although many individual studies reported the incidence rates of KPB, there is a lack of precise estimations due to limitations, such as biased data collection from single medical center, relatively small sample size, and the different endpoints of the disease. Besides, the impact of ESBL-KP or CRKP on mortality rates among patients with bacteremia should also be studied since 2018 (Ramos-Castaneda et al., 2018). Thus, a systematic review was performed to analyze the mortality rate in KPB as well as the impact of ESBL-KP or CRKP on the mortality rate of patients with bacteremia.
Methods
Reporting guideline
The study was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (Page et al., 2021). The PRISMA 2020 checklist is presented in Supplementary Materials 1 Table S1.
Database search
Two reviewers independently searched EMbase, Web of Science, PubMed, and The Cochrane Library, up to September 18th, 2022. The search was performed using both Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and keywords: “Klebsiella pneumoniae”, “bacteremia or bloodstream infection”, and “mortality or death or survival or outcome” with no date or language restrictions. The search strategy is shown in Supplementary Material 1 Text S1. In addition, manual search was performed to find relevant studies from the references of the found studies.
Study criteria and definitions
Inclusion criteria were as follows: i) Observational studies; ii) Studies reported with more than fifty patients with bacteremia caused by KP; iii) Eligible studies were included with no language restrictions. Exclusion criteria were as follows: i) In vitro studies, case reports or case series (n < 50), reviews, conference abstracts, study protocols, trial registrations, and duplicate publications; ii) Studies that included KPB patients as a sub-group or included only a sub-population of KPB patients based on infectious foci or patient characteristics, for the reason that these studies in most cases cannot derive the number of patients who died from KPB or provide sufficient information to evaluate the risk of bias.
The definitions were based on articles included in the study. KPB was defined as the isolation of KP in a blood culture specimen. CRKP was defined as resistant to at least one carbapenem or produced a carbapenemase. Hospital-acquired (HA) bacteremia was defined as a positive blood culture from a patient 48 hours after admission and no signs of infection had been noted at admission. Appropriate antibiotic therapy was defined as treatment regimen included at least one antimicrobial agent active in vitro against KP.
Data extraction
Two authors independently extracted and then cross-checked the studies. The following data of the studies was extracted: the first author’s name, published year, study year(s), location, study design, patient characteristics (i.e., age, sex, and number of patients), and outcomes (7-day,14-day, 28- or 30-day, 90-day, and in hospital mortality rates if reported).
Risk of bias assessment
The Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool (Sterne JAC and Elbers, 2016) was used to evaluate the risk of bias of the included studies. This tool covers seven domains and refer to a hypothetical randomized trial as a “target” randomized trial. The seven domains were as follows: bias due to confounding, bias in selection of participants, bias in classification of interventions, bias due to deviations from intended interventions, bias due to missing data, bias in measurement of outcomes, and bias in selection of the reported result. Two investigators independently answered the signaling questions to judge for each bias domain. The overall risk of bias is categorized as ‘Low’, ‘Moderate’, ‘Serious’ or ‘Critical’. Any disagreement was resolved by a third researcher.
Statistical analysis
The primary outcome was the 30-day mortality rate of single proportion after diagnosis of KPB; besides, the 7-, 14-, 90-day, and in hospital mortality rates were also analyzed. If two studies have same data while the endpoints were different, both studies would be included. Statistical heterogeneity among studies was determined by I2 statistics (degree of heterogeneity) and the Cochran Q test (p<0.05 indicated significant heterogeneity among studies). A random-effects model was used for pooled analysis in case of significant heterogeneity (I2>50%). Otherwise, the fixed-effects model was performed. Sensitivity analyses was performed by excluding one study in each turn to evaluate the influence of the individual trial on the overall pooled effects. The publication bias was assessed by visual inspection of the funnel plot and Peter’s test (Bai et al., 2022). If publication bias exsists, trim and filled model will be used to adjust for the funnel plot asymmetry.
In order to explore possible sources of heterogeneity (single proportion of 30-day mortality), a meta-regression analyse was conducted using a mixed-effects model. The variables were as follows: proportion of male, study design (classified into prospective or retrospective, cohort or case control or cross sectional), country (Asia, Europe, North America), study period (2006–2010, 2011–2015, 2016–2020, 2021–2022), mean or median age, proportion of ICU patients, proportion of patients used appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy, proportion of patients with CRKP bacteremia, proportion of patients with ESBL-KP bacteremia, and proportion of patients with hospital-acquired (HA) KPB. Subgroup analyses would be prespecified if significant factors were found in the meraregression model. Besides, pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI were further performed to compare mortality rates in patients with ESBL-KP or CRKP with those in patients with non-ESBL-KP or non-CRKP bacteremia.
The meta-analysis was conducted by R (version 4.0.3) package meta (Schwarzer, 2022).
Results
Study characteristics
Of the 7,040 retrieved studies, 157 papers (37,915 enrolled patients) were included in the review (Figure 1). The references and studies with excluding reasons are listed in Supplementary Materials 1 Text S2 and Table S2, respectively. The characteristics of the included 157 articles are described in Supplementary Materials 1 Table S3, consisting of 18 prospective and 139 retrospective observational studies. Out of the 157 studies, 130 studies reported data from single centers and 27 studies reported data from multiple centers. These studies were published between 2001 and 2022, and the sample size varied from 50 to 5,712. The top five countries where studies were performed were China (65 studies), Italy (14 studies), South Korea (12 studies), Greece (10 studies), and Turkey (7 studies).
Risk of bias assessment
The Robvis tool (McGuinness and Higgins, 2021) was used to assess publication quality by the risk of bias. The results for each study and each domain are presented in Supplementary Materials 2 Figure S1. Since ROBINS-I tool emulates a hypothetical randomized trial to evaluate risk of bias in each domain, it is rare that an observational study would be judged as at low risk of bias in confounding domain. Therefore, most studies were judged as at least moderate overall risk of bias. In addition, for the reason that the primary study object was mortality rate, which was an objective measure, it was unlikely to be manipulated, almost all of studies included (except two studies) in the meta-analysis were judged as low risk of bias in measurement of outcomes domain. 149 (94.9%) studies were judged as serious or critical overall risk of bias, and the left 8 (5.1%) studies were at moderate overall risk of bias.
Estimates of single proportion mortality rates in KPB
A total of 101 studies reported 30-day mortality with a total of 25,800 patients, yielding a proportion of 29% (95% CI=0.26-0.31) (Figure 2). In addition, the pooled 7-, 14-, 90-day, and in hospital mortality rates for KPB are listed in Supplementary Materials 2 Figures S2-S5, and the corresponding pooled death proportions were 17% (95% CI=0.14-0.20), 24% (95% CI=0.21-0.28), 34% (95% CI=0.26-0.42), and 29% (95% CI=0.26-0.33), respectively. Heterogeneities were observed high among all endpoints.
Comparison of ESBL-KP and non-ESBL-KP bacteremia
The pooled mortality rates at different time points (14-, 28- or 30-day, and in hospital) with ESBL-KP vs. non-ESBL-KP are presented in Supplementary Materials 2 Figures S6-S8. Overall, ESBL-KP bacteremia was associated with a higher mortality than non-ESBL-KP bacteremia. The pooled ORs at various time points (14-, 28- or 30-day, and in hospital) were 1.82 (95% CI 1.16-2.86), 1.57 (95% CI 1.07-2.32), and 1.57 (95% CI 1.23-2.02), respectively, with significant differences.
Comparison of CRKP and non-CRKP bacteremia
A total of 26 studies assessed 30-day mortality for CRKP vs. non-CRKP bacteremia producing an OR of 3.87 (95% CI 3.01-3.49) (Figure 3). Overall, CRKP bacteremia was associated with a significant higher mortality than non-CRKP bacteremia. The forest plots of different endpoints (7-, 14-day, and in hospital) can be found in Supplementary Materials 2 Figures S9-S11, and the corresponding pooled ORs at various endpoints (7-, 14-, in hospital) were 3.22 (95% CI 1.18-8.76), 5.66 (95% CI 4.31-7.42), and 4.05 (95% CI 3.38-4.85), respectively.
Sensitivity analysis and publication bias
Sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of an individual trial on the overall pooled effects. The Forest plots of sensitivity test for all KPB are presented in Supplementary Materials 2 Figures S12-S23. In brief, almost all sensitivity analyses showed that exclusion of any individual study did not affect the overall pooled effects of mortality. In terms of publication bias, no significant asymmetry was observed in single proportion 7-day mortality, mortality (14-, 30-day and in-hospital) for ESBL vs. non-ESBL KPB, and mortality (7-, 14-, 30-day and in-hospital) for CRKP vs. non-CRKP KPB. A significant asymmetry was found in funnel plots for single proportion 14-, 30-day, and in-hospital mortality. The funnel plots and Peter’s tests are presented in Supplementary Materials 2 Figures S24-S35. Trim and filled model was further used to adjust the funnel plot asymmetry in single proportion 14-, 30-day and in-hospital mortality. The adjusted funnel plots are presented in Supplementary Materials 2 Figures S36-S38.
Meta-regression and subgroup analysis of single proportion of 30-day mortality for KPB
Meta-regression showed that the potential sources of heterogeneity include the proportion of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, the proportion of HA patients, the proportion of patients with CRKP bacteremia, and the proportion of patients with ESBL-KP bacteremia (Table 1). Heterogeneity was not seen for factors including age, study period, study design, location, and the proportion of male, and appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (Table 1). Subgroup analyses were further conducted to analyze the impact of the proportion of ICU, HA, CRKP, ESBL-KP on the 30-day mortality for KPB (Table 2). More than 50% of ICU, HA, CRKP, ESBL-KP were associated with a significantly higher 30-day mortality rates in patients with KPB. Partial heterogeneity was explained by these four factors
Discussion
In the systematic review of 157 studies on KPB, the pooled overall mortality rates were 17% at 7-day, 24% at 14-day, 29% at 30-day, 34% at 90-day, and 29% in hospital. It showed that more than 50% of ICU, HA, CRKP, ESBL-KP increased the 30-day mortality rates in patients with KPB.
KP belongs to Enterobacteriaceae, is one of the most life-threatening pathogens which can cause invasive infections (Zhang et al., 2022). Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) has been listed as “urgent threats” by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (Chen et al., 2022). CRKP is one of the CRE species which the public most frequently encounter, accounting for 64-87.7% (Grundmann et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2017; Li et al., 2021). However, with antimicrobial resistance increased annually causing a great health threat to the public, the accurate estimates of mortality rates for KPB have been insufficient. To our knowledge, this study provided the most up-to-date and comprehensive evidence of accurate estimation of KPB mortality rates. During the last decade, only one systematic review and meta-analysis (Kohler et al., 2017) evaluated the mortality rate of KPB including only 15 studies comparing CRKP vs. carbapenem-sensitive Klebsiella pneumoniae (CSKP). In the current study, the estimates of mortality rates for KPB were 17% at 7-day, 24% at 14-day, and 29% at 30-day, which were significantly higher than E. coli bacteremia (12.4%) reported by the systematic review (Bonten et al., 2021). The reasons for this scenario are not well-understood. However, there are several critical factors which might contribute to this disparity, for example patients with KPB are more likely to have a HA bacteremia, cardiovascular, or renal disease, and more likely to be in the ICU at the time of bacteremia diagnosis (Scheuerman et al., 2018). Additionally, to explore potential sources of heterogeneity, a meta-regression analyse was performed. Heterogeneity factors were found in the proportions of ICU patients, HA patients, and patients with CRKP or ESBL-KP bacteremia. However, when subgroup analyses were performed, few heterogeneities would be explained. It suggests that some other factors exist among these studies, such as the severity of illness, or the source of bacteremia. Due to the lack of data and different reporting scheme across studies, our analysis did not include these modulators. In addition, the results found a significantly higher 30-day mortality in patients with HA bacteremia. The same scenario happened for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia reported in a systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Bai and his colleagles (Bai et al., 2022). Previous studies (Tsay et al., 2002; Kang et al., 2006; Juan et al., 2019) revealed that nosocomial KPB was usually associated with a significantly higher mortality rate than community- acquired KPB. The current study re-emphasized the severity of nosocomial KPB.
In the present study, a significantly higher mortality rate in patients with CRKP bacteremia compared to those with non-CRKP bacteremia was found (Figure 3). The OR in each endpoint calculated by this study was higher than the previous study published in 2017 (Kohler et al., 2017). Alarmingly, although countermeasures have been taken to suppress these pathogens, the mortality rate of CRKP bacteremia in patients was obviously raised with the increased of CRKP. Most recently, clinicians have faced an even greater challenge that CRKP coexists with high virulence. The scenario has led lethal outbreaks in several hospitals (Gu et al., 2018; Mohammad Ali Tabrizi et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2019). It is concerning that these pathogens would spread rapidly if effective measurements were not applied.
The study has several limitations. First, all the included studies were observational studies, and most were retrospective. The confounding domains (age, male, severity of disease, healthcare use and so on) did not overcome or not fully overcome in most studies, therefore, most included studies were judged as serious or critical risk of bias in confounding domains producing serious or critical overall risk of bias. Second, the heterogeneities were high at most endpoints. Although a meta-regression model was used to analyze the potential sources of heterogeneity factors, due to the lack of data and different reporting scheme across studies, the study did not include some significant modulators. Third, the definitions of CRKP are somewhat variable and the microbiological breakpoints changed over time. Additionally, the definitions of HA and appropriate antibiotic therapy are somewhat different as well.
In summary, the study provides the most up-to-date and comprehensive evidence of accurate estimation if KPB mortality rate. In addition, the proportion of ICU, HA, CRKP, ESBL-KP more than 50% increased the 30-day mortality rates in patients with KPB. It is concerning that the mortality rates of patients with CRKP bacteremia may raise with the increase of CRKP. Effective countermeasures should be taken to curb this scenario.
Author contributions
JZ designed and supervised the study. DL and XH wrote the manuscript and revised the project. YL and HY performed the literature search. HR and SL checked the data. All authors approved the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81702064), Sichuan Science and Technology Program(2022NSFSC1565), Sichuan Science and Technology Program(2023JDRC0101), Health Commission of Sichuan Province Program (Sichuan-cadres-research 2017-19).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1157010/full#supplementary-material
Abbreviations
CRKP, carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae; CRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; CSKP, carbapenem-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae; E. coli, Escherichia coli; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-Lactamase-positive; HA, hospital-acquired; ICU, intensive care unit; KP, Klebsiella pneumoniae; KPB, Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia; KPC, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase; ORs, odds ratios; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses; ROBINS-I, Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool.
References
Bai, A. D., Lo, C. K., Komorowski, A. S., Suresh, M., Guo, K., Garg, A., et al. (2022). Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 28 (8), 1076–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.03.015
Balkan, I. I., Alkan, M., Aygun, G., Kuskucu, M., Ankarali, H., Karagoz, A., et al. (2021). Colistin resistance increases 28-day mortality in bloodstream infections due to carbapenem-resistant klebsiella pneumoniae. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 40 (10), 2161–2170. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04124-y
Bonten, M., Johnson, J. R., van den Biggelaar, A. H. J., Georgalis, L., Geurtsen, J., de Palacios, P. I., et al. (2021). Epidemiology of escherichia coli bacteremia: a systematic literature review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 72 (7), 1211–1219. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa210
Castanheira, M., Deshpande, L. M., Mendes, R. E., Canton, R., Sader, H. S., Jones, R. N. (2019). Variations in the occurrence of resistance phenotypes and carbapenemase genes among isolates in 20 years of the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6 (Suppl 1), S23–S33. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy347
CDC (2022). Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/national-estimates.html.
Chang, E. K., Kao, K. L., Tsai, M. S., Yang, C. J., Huang, Y. T., Liu, C. Y., et al. (2015). Occult klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia at emergency department: a single center experience. J. microbiol. immunol. infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi 48 (6), 684–691. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.010
Chen, Y., Huang, H.-B., Peng, J.-M., Weng, L., Du, B. (2022). Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales bloodstream infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microbiol. Spectr. 10 (2), e0260321. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02603-21
Cubero, M., Grau, I., Tubau, F., Pallarés, R., Domínguez, M., Liñares, J., et al. (2018). Molecular epidemiology of klebsiella pneumoniae strains causing bloodstream infections in adults. Microb. Drug Resist. 24 (7), 949–957. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2017.0107
Falcone, M., Bassetti, M., Tiseo, G., Giordano, C., Nencini, E., Russo, A., et al. (2020). Time to appropriate antibiotic therapy is a predictor of outcome in patients with bloodstream infection caused by KPC-producing klebsiella pneumoniae. Crit. Care (London England) 24 (1), 29. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2742-9
Gao, L., Lv, Y., Li, Y. (2020). Analysis of the drug resistance of carbapenem-resistant klebsiella pneumoniae in the China antimicrobial resistance surveillance trial program, 2007-2018. Microb. Drug Resist. 26 (8), 944–950. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2019.0299
Grundmann, H., Glasner, C., Albiger, B., Aanensen, D. M., Tomlinson, C. T., Andrasević, A. T., et al. (2017). Occurrence of carbapenemase-producing klebsiella pneumoniae and escherichia coli in the European survey of carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE): a prospective, multinational study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 17 (2), 153–163. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30257-2
Gu, D., Dong, N., Zheng, Z., Lin, D., Huang, M., Wang, L., et al. (2018). A fatal outbreak of ST11 carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent klebsiella pneumoniae in a Chinese hospital: a molecular epidemiological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 18 (1), 37–46. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30489-9
Hyun, M., Noh, C. I., Ryu, S. Y., Kim, H. A. (2018). Changing trends in clinical characteristics and antibiotic susceptibility of klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia. Korean J. Internal Med. 33 (3), 595–603. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2015.257
Imai, K., Ishibashi, N., Kodana, M., Tarumoto, N., Sakai, J., Kawamura, T., et al. (2019). Clinical characteristics in blood stream infections caused by klebsiella pneumoniae, klebsiella variicola, and klebsiella quasipneumoniae: a comparative study, Japan, 2014-2017. BMC Infect. Dis. 19 (1), 946. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4498-x
Juan, C. H., Chuang, C., Chen, C. H., Li, L., Lin, Y. T. (2019). Clinical characteristics, antimicrobial resistance and capsular types of community-acquired, healthcare-associated, and nosocomial klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 8, 1. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0426-x
Kang, C. I., Kim, S. H., Bang, J. W., Kim, H. B., Kim, N. J., Kim, E. C., et al. (2006). Community-acquired versus nosocomial klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: clinical features, treatment outcomes, and clinical implication of antimicrobial resistance. J. Korean Med. Sci. 21 (5), 816–822. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2006.21.5.816
Kim, D., Park, B. Y., Choi, M. H., Yoon, E. J., Lee, H., Lee, K. J., et al. (2019). Antimicrobial resistance and virulence factors of klebsiella pneumoniae affecting 30 day mortality in patients with bloodstream infection. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 74 (1), 190–199. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky397
Kohler, P. P., Volling, C., Green, K., Uleryk, E. M., Shah, P. S., McGeer, A. (2017). Carbapenem resistance, initial antibiotic therapy, and mortality in klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection control Hosp. Epidemiol. 38 (11), 1319–1328. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.197
Lee, J. S., Choi, J. Y., Chung, E. S., Peck, K. R., Ko, K. S. (2019). Variation in the formation of persister cells against meropenem in klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia and analysis of its clinical features. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 95 (3), 114853. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.06.005
Lee, J. A., Kang, C. I., Joo, E. J., Ha, Y. E., Kang, S. J., Park, S. Y., et al. (2011). Epidemiology and clinical features of community-onset bacteremia caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing klebsiella pneumoniae. Microb. Drug Resist. 17 (2), 267–273. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2010.0134
Lee, N. Y., Lo, C. L., Chen, P. L., Syue, L. S., Li, C. W., Li, M. C., et al. (2021). Clinical impact of cefepime breakpoint in patients with carbapenem-resistant klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 57 (2), 106250. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106250
Lee, N. Y., Wu, J. J., Lin, S. H., Ko, W. C., Tsai, L. H., Yan, J. (2012). Characterization of carbapenem-nonsusceptible klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream isolates at a Taiwanese hospital: clinical impacts of lowered breakpoints for carbapenems. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 31 (8), 1941–1950. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1525-2
Li, D., Chen, Y., Zhang, W., Zheng, S., Zhang, Q., Bai, C., et al. (2014). Risk factors for hospital-acquired bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase klebsiella pneumoniae among cancer patients. Irish J. Med. Sci. 183 (3), 463–469. doi: 10.1007/s11845-013-1043-6
Li, L., Huang, H. (2017). Risk factors of mortality in bloodstream infections caused by klebsiella pneumonia. A single-center retrospective study in China. Medicine (Baltimore). 96 (35):e7924. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007924
Li, J., Huang, Z., Tang, M., Min, C., Xia, F., Hu, Y., et al. (2021). Clonal dissemination of multiple carbapenemase genes in carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales mediated by multiple plasmids in China. Infection Drug resistance 14, 3287–3295. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S327273
McGuinness, L. A., Higgins, J. P. T. (2021). Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res. Synthesis Methods. 12 (1):55–61. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1411
Meng, H., Han, L., Niu, M., Xu, L., Xu, M., An, Q., et al. (2022). Risk factors for mortality and outcomes in hematological malignancy patients with carbapenem-resistant klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections. Drug Resistance 15, 4241–4251. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S374904
Mohammad Ali Tabrizi, A., Badmasti, F., Shahcheraghi, F., Azizi, O. (2018). Outbreak of hypervirulent klebsiella pneumoniae harbouring bla(VIM-2) among mechanically-ventilated drug-poisoning patients with high mortality rate in Iran. J. Glob Antimicrob. Resist. 15, 93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.06.020
Nelson, R. E., Hatfield, K. M., Wolford, H., Samore, M. H., Scott, R. D., Reddy, S. C., et al. (2021). National estimates of healthcare costs associated with multidrug-resistant bacterial infections among hospitalized patients in the united states. Clin. Infect. Dis. 72 (Suppl 1), S17–S26. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1581
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372, n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
Pau, C. K., Ma, F. F., Ip, M., You, J. H. (2015). Characteristics and outcomes of klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia in Hong Kong. Infect. Dis. (Lond) 47 (5), 283–288. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2014.985710
Pépin, J., Yared, N., Alarie, I., Lanthier, L., Vanasse, A., Tessier, P., et al. (2010). Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia in a region of Canada. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 16 (2), 141–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02912.x
Ramos-Castaneda, J. A., Ruano-Ravina, A., Barbosa-Lorenzo, R., Paillier-Gonzalez, J. E., Saldana-Campos, J. C., Salinas, D. F., et al. (2018). Mortality due to KPC carbapenemase-producing klebsiella pneumoniae infections: systematic review and meta-analysis mortality due to KPC klebsiella pneumoniae infections. J. Infection 76 (5), 438–448. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.02.007
Reid, C. B., Steele, L., Pasquill, K., Parfitt, E. C., Laupland, K. B. (2019). Occurrence and determinants of klebsiella species bloodstream infection in the western interior of British Columbia, Canada. BMC Infect. Dis. 19 (1), 1070. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4706-8
Scheuerman, O., Schechner, V., Carmeli, Y., Gutierrez-Gutierrez, B., Calbo, E., Almirante, B., et al. (2018). Comparison of predictors and mortality between bloodstream infections caused by ESBL-producing escherichia coli and ESBL-producing klebsiella pneumoniae. Infection control Hosp. Epidemiol. 39 (6), 660–667. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.63
Schwarzer, G. (2022) General package for meta-analysis. Available at: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-21416-0.
Shen, Y. F., Chen, L. Y., He, F. (2020). A study on clinical outcomes and death risk factors in adult patients with klebsiella pneumoniae septicemia. Acta Med. Mediterr. 36 (5), 3167–3171. doi: 10.19193/0393-6384_2020_5_489
Sterne JAC, H. J., Elbers, R. G. (2016) Reeves BC and the development group for ROBINS-I, risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-i): detailed guidance, updated 12 October 2016. Available at: http://www.riskofbias.info.
Tsay, R. W., Siu, L. K., Fung, C. P., Chang, F. Y. (2002). Characteristics of bacteremia between community-acquired and nosocomial klebsiella pneumoniae infection: risk factor for mortality and the impact of capsular serotypes as a herald for community-acquired infection. Arch. Intern. Med. 162 (9), 1021–1027. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.9.1021
Xiao, T., Yu, W., Niu, T., Huang, C., Xiao, Y. (2018). A retrospective, comparative analysis of risk factors and outcomes in carbapenem-susceptible and carbapenem-nonsusceptible klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: tigecycline significantly increases the mortality. Infection Drug resistance 11, 595–606. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S153246
Zhang, R., Chan, E. W.-C., Zhou, H., Chen, S. (2017). Prevalence and genetic characteristics of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae strains in China. Lancet Infect. Dis. 17 (3), 256–257. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30072-5
Zhang, J., Li, D., Huang, X., Long, S., Yu, H. (2022). The distribution of in different specimen sources and its antibiotic resistance trends in sichuan, China from 2017 to 2020. Front. In Med. 9, 759214. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.759214
Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., Torres, V. V. L., Liu, H., Rocker, A., Zhang, Y., et al. (2019). An outbreak of carbapenem-resistant and hypervirulent klebsiella pneumoniae in an intensive care unit of a major teaching hospital in wenzhou, China. Front. Public Health 7, 229. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00229
Keywords: Klebsiella pneumoniae, bacteremia, mortality, meta-analysis, carbapenem-resistant
Citation: Li D, Huang X, Rao H, Yu H, Long S, Li Y and Zhang J (2023) Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 13:1157010. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1157010
Received: 02 February 2023; Accepted: 11 April 2023;
Published: 20 April 2023.
Edited by:
Xinhua Qu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, ChinaReviewed by:
Nubwa Medugu, Nile University of Nigeria, NigeriaGokcen Dinc, Erciyes University, Türkiye
Copyright © 2023 Li, Huang, Rao, Yu, Long, Li and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jie Zhang, emhhbmdqaWVzcHBoQDE2My5jb20=