Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 19 April 2023
Sec. Clinical Microbiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Design and development of new therapeutics against infectious diseases using computational and experimental approaches View all 13 articles

Emerging evidence on Monkeypox: resurgence, global burden, molecular insights, genomics and possible management

Ruchi SharmaRuchi Sharma1Kow-Tong Chen,*Kow-Tong Chen2,3*Rohit Sharma*&#x;Rohit Sharma1*†
  • 1Department of Rasa Shastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana, Faculty of Ayurveda, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • 2Department of Occupational Medicine, Tainan Municipal Hospital (managed by Show Chwan Medical Care Corporation), Tainan, Taiwan
  • 3Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

An outbreak of monkeypox (encoded enveloped double stranded DNA), resurgence and expansion has emerged in early 2022, posing a new threat to global health. Even though, many reports are available on monkeypox, still a comprehensive updated review is needed. Present updated review is focused to fill the research gaps pertaining to the monkeypox, and an extensive search was conducted in a number of databases, including Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct. Although the disease usually progresses self-limiting, some patients require admission for kidney injury, pharyngitis, myocarditis, and soft tissue super infections. There is no well-known treatment available yet; still there has been a push for the use of antiviral therapy and tecovirimat as a promising option when dealing with co-morbidities. In this study, we mapped and discussed the updates and scientific developments surrounding monkeypox, including its potential molecular mechanisms, genomics, transmission, risk factors, diagnosis, prevention, vaccines, treatment, possible plant-based treatment along with their proposed mechanisms. Each day, a growing number of monkeypox cases are reported, and more cases are expected in the near future. As of now, monkeypox does not have a well-established and proven treatment, and several investigations are underway to find the best possible treatment from natural or synthetic drug sources. Multiple molecular mechanisms on pathophysiological cascades of monkeypox virus infection are discussed here along with updates on genomics, and possible preventive and therapeutic strategies.

1 Introduction

An evolving zoonotic disease, monkeypox occurs due to a virus belonging to poxviridae family and orthopoxvirus genus (Lai et al., 2022). Along with cowpox virus, variola virus, and vaccinia virus, the monkeypox virus is one of four orthopox virus species that causes disease in humans (Shchelkunov et al., 2005). A monkeypox infection causes few symptoms identical to those of smallpox, but is less severe, and rarely causes death compared to that of smallpox (Petersen et al., 2019). Two outbreaks of a disease that appeared like pox, led to the discovery of monkeypox in 1958 which spread across colonies of monkeys (Mileto et al., 2022). Monkeypox may have been named so, due to its first-time appearance in monkeys and pox like symptoms, but its origin remains mysterious (Begum et al., 2023). The virus can, however, also be carried by African rodents and nonhuman primates (such as monkeys) and infect humans (Begum et al., 2023). Later an instance of monkeypox in a human was first reported in 1970 (Sejvar et al., 2004). By the time, number of countries in Central and Western Africa had already reported the monkeypox cases before the outbreak of 2022 (Simões and Bhagani, 2022). Prior to recently, nearly all monkeypox cases aside from Africa were associated with traveling overseas countries or importing animals that frequently suffer from the disease (Al-Tawfiq et al., 2022). It has been determined that the monkeypox outbreak has resulted in a public health emergency of International concern in multiple countries (Formenty et al., 2010).

Several mammalian species are known to be susceptible to monkeypox, however the native host of the disease is unidentified (Khodakevich et al., 1986). From times monkeypox virus isolates have known of two wild animal origins: a rope squirrel and a sooty mangabey from Ivory Coast and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) places respectively (Khodakevich et al., 1986; Jezek et al., 1988; Hutson et al., 2009; Radonić et al., 2014). Monkeypox has a similar clinical picture to smallpox, but the major difference is the swelling of lymph nodes that begins early, often during fever (Sklenovská and Van Ranst, 2018) and has a lower mortality rate (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2022). There can be a period of infection of up to four weeks before the lesion of monkeypox desquamates (Fenner et al., 1998). It is likely that patients will experience complications such as second level bacterial infections, bronchopneumonia, respiratory distress, dehydration, gastrointestinal complications, encephalitis, sepsis, and infection of cornea with blindness as a result (Elsevier – clinical overviews, 2022). At present, no specific treatment exists for monkeypox virus infections, instead patients being treated with symptomatic treatment and supportive care (Otu et al., 2022).

Even though many short studies are present, there is a need of study which covers the detailed explanation of the disease along with mechanism involved in it. So, this study was conducted in order to map and summarize upcoming scientific developments surrounding monkeypox, such as its potential molecular insights, genomic patterns, diagnosis, prevention, vaccines, treatment and possible plant-based leads of monkeypox. Presented below is a comprehensive updated review that illustrates a better understanding on monkeypox virus. Understanding the mechanisms involved in monkeypox infection will strengthen the disease preventive and therapeutic strategies along with the discovery of new drugs.

2 Methodology

We conducted a review based on scientific articles that addressed monkeypox and its diagnostic method or treatment, especially pharmacological properties (Figure 1). Science Direct, SciFinder, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus were the search engines used to search for published articles (till 24, November, 2022). For extracting information about the effects of monkeypox on global transmission and treatment, we used keywords such as “monkeypox”, “transmission”, “mode of spread”, “fatality”, “incidence rate”, “prevention”, “diagnosis”, “vaccine”, “genomics”, “molecular mechanism”, “treatment”, “clinical trial”, “case study”, “traditional medicine”, and “mechanism of action”, along with their corresponding MeSH terms and conjunctions OR/AND. To understand the severity of disease and possible treatment options, we searched the available reports for scientific claims. All searches were limited to English. We excluded conference proceedings, gray literature, unpublished data, newspaper articles, preliminary reports without substantial proof of the claim, abstracts and full texts that could not be retrieved, and studies not relevant to this review. The graphs were generated using the GraphPad software version 6 for analysis.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Flowchart showing screening methodology for the review.

3 Timeline recapped

A non-fatal pox outbreak was first reported in 1958 by Von Magnus in Copenhagen in Cynomolgus macaque (C. macaque). Prior to 1970, no human infection with monkeypox virus had been documented (Breman et al., 1980; Sejvar et al., 2004). The following cases of human monkeypox have been reported worldwide since 1970 (Figure 2, Table 1) (World Health Organization, 1996; Merouze and Lesoin, 1983; World Health Organization, 2022; McConnell et al., 1962; Ladnyj et al., 1972; Breman et al., 1980; Massung et al., 1994; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1997; Mukinda et al., 1997; Anderson et al., 2003; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2003a; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2003b; Huhn et al., 2005; Learned et al., 2005; Likos et al., 2005; Nalca et al., 2005; Reynolds et al., 2006; Hutson et al., 2007; Rimoin et al., 2010; Kantele et al., 2016; Kozlov, 2018; Beer and Bhargavi Rao, 2019; Bhattacharya et al., 2022; Luo and Han, 2022; Tomori and Ogoina, 2022). On June 23, 2022, the WHO declared monkeypox as an “evolving threat of moderate public health concern” (Reed et al., 2004). In a WHO report published on 23 July 2022, there were more than 16,000 cases with five deaths reported from 75 countries and territories (World Health Organisation, 2022). The outbreak of monkeypox in 2022 gained global attention when WHO declared it an “International Health Emergency” on July 27, 2022 (As monkeypox surges, WHO urges reducing number of sexual partners, 2022). Recently, in nearly 110 countries, 80,850 confirmed cases (79,877 in areas where monkeypox has not been reported historically and 973 in areas where monkeypox has been reported historically) and 55 deaths (42 in areas where monkeypox have not reported historically and 13 in areas where monkeypox have been reported historically) were reported till 24, November, 2022 (Monkeypox data explorer - our world in data, 2022).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Timeline of events in monkeypox’s global transmission.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 An overview of monkeypox outbreaks cases between August, 1970 and 24, November, 2022.

4 Monkeypox virus strains: Genomic perspective

Figure 3A shows structure of the double stranded DNA virus (monkeypox virus), which causes monkeypox to occur in humans and animals (Figure 3B). This virus belonged to the poxviridae family and referred to as orthopoxviruses. As with variola, cowpox, and vaccinia, monkeypox virus belongs to the orthopoxvirus genus. It is not related to, nor is it descended from, the variola virus, which is responsible for smallpox (von Magnus et al., 1959; Breman et al., 1980; Shchelkunov et al., 2002; Alkhalil et al., 2010).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Monkeypox virus; (A) Structure, (B) Global transmission, (C) Reported death cases of different geographical areas (till 24, November, 2022).

Two genetic clades have been identified in monkeypox virus, namely Central African clade (recently renamed as Clade I) and West African clade (recently renamed as Clade II). Furthermore, Clade II has two subclades: IIa and IIb, referring to the set of mutations that are circulating in the 2022 worldwide pandemic. There is a geographic separation between these two clades, as well as a distinction between their epidemiological and clinical characteristics. It has never been documented that West African clade transmits from case to case, and there is a case fatality rate (CFR) of 1%. As a contrast, the Congo Basin clade (aka Central African clade) exhibits a CFR of 11%, and transmission has been documented up to six times sequentially. It is believed that isolates from West African clade came from Nigeria, Ivory Coast, Liberia, USA, and Sierra Leone (imported from Ghana). On the other hand, isolates from Central African clade come from Congo, Gabon, Central African Republic, Cameroon, Sudan, and DRC. Non-vaccinated individuals of Central African encountered a 10% death rate in the 1980s, while cases occurring in West African strains were not fatal. It has been confirmed that the 2022 monkeypox virus is of West African origin based on preliminary genetic data. Various studies were conducted to compare genomes and was found that nucleotide sequences of the Central African strain (ZAI-96) differ by 0.55-0.56% from those of 3 West African strains (SL-V70, WRAIR-61 and COP-58). Central and West African strains have 173 and 171 unique functional genes, respectively. In terms of protein sequence, they have about 99.4% identity and share 170 orthologs. Transcription regulatory sequences between the two genomes did not differ significantly. In order to determine which virulence genes are present in both strains, researchers studied 56 virulence genes to determine which are present in both strains, 53 of which were found common to both. 276 substitutions have been found in these 53 genes, accounting for 93 non-conservative changes, 61 conservative changes, and 121 silent changes in amino acid. In total, 16 proteins have extended their N- and C-termini, altering their predicted size. A study reported that BR-203, COP-C3L, and BR-209 orthologs accounted for significant virulence differences between the two strains, which is supported by another study reporting similar gene candidates (Jezek and Fenner, 1988; von Magnus et al., 1959; Ladnyj et al., 1972; Ježek et al., 1987; Chen et al., 2005; Likos et al., 2005; Osorio and Yuill, 2008; Weaver and Isaacs, 2008; Monkeypox: experts give virus variants new names, 2022; Comparative pathology of north American and central African strains of monkeypox virus in a ground squirrel model of the disease, 2022; Multi-country monkeypox outbreak: situation update, 2022).

Monkeypox virus encoded of all the orthopoxvirus genes known so far, but have only small subsets of the genes related to host range and immunomodulation (Shchelkunov et al., 2002). Monkeypox may adapt further to become a more effective human pathogen by a series of extended person-to-person transmissions. Moreover, as the human population changes, ecological disturbances occurs and new infections emerges such as the HIV and COVID-19, which can be a possible cause of decreased immunity and further contributing towards more spreading of monkeypox virus (Chen et al., 2005; Likos et al., 2005; Weaver and Isaacs, 2008).

Also, an analysis of publicly available genomes from the current human monkeypox virus outbreak of 2022 was conducted to determine the phylogenetic diversity. As compared to previous monkeypox virus outbreaks, this outbreak reveals a distinct monophyletic lineage. Virus outbreaks in Europe may have started as early as March 2022, according to studies. As compared to its related viral predecessors from 2018 and 2019, monkeypox virus 2022 exhibits a marked divergence. In contrast to what is normally observed in orthopoxviruses, the heightened mutational signature this time indicates an accelerated evolutionary path. There has been an increase in cases reported across multiple regions, suggesting that some of these changes in genomics have led to more efficient transmission and dispersal mechanisms, which are compatible with sexual transmission, but research is needed to confirm this assertion. In addition, host-specific mechanisms, like APOBEC enzymatic editing, may be driving this rapid evolution of virus in favor of emergence of a host-specific clade that has enhanced human-to-human transmission capabilities. In light of its continuous spread across different countries and the increasing number of cases reported globally, genomic variability is likely to increase continuously its transmission efficiency (Kraemer et al., 2022; Luna et al., 2022).

In another study on monkeypox virus genome comparisons, indicate that COP-C3L ortholog, a gene that codes for a complement control protein associated to innate immune response, may play a role in determining the degree of virulence among those strains. One SCR domain is truncated in the Central African ortholog of COP-C3L, which is likely to affect its function, particularly its decay-accelerating ability. The monkeypox strain of Central Africa also contains truncated COP-E3L and COP-K3L, which is similar to the proteins in variola and vaccinia and allows the organism to resist interferons (IFN). Unlike COP-E3L and COP-K3L, monkeypox virus has a full-length ortholog of BR-203 (protein that prevents lymphocytes apoptosis), but variola virus lacks it and vaccinia virus has fragments. The differences between these three orthopoxviruses in terms of virulence may be explained by their proteins differences which affect the host immune system. Research is needed to determine whether genes encoding of proteins fragments with known functions influence its virulence. It may be possible to develop safer vaccines and better therapeutics with such knowledge (Carter et al., 2005; Reynolds et al., 2017).

5 Molecular perspective

As molecular biology has advanced, we have gained a deeper understanding of how viruses replicate and infect cells. The genome of this organism is relatively larger containing approximately 1,96,858 number of base pairs, which encodes for 190 open reading frames (Shchelkunov et al., 2002). These open reading frames of virus make up most of the replication material in the infected cell. Viral entry into cells depends on the cell type and viral strain and is initiated once the virus attaches to the cell surface through the interaction between multiple viral ligands and cell receptors (Carter et al., 2005).

An apoptosis is a natural mechanism that occurs when a variety of stimuli trigger the death of cells for maintaining homeostasis in tissue and removal of abnormal or infected cells (Hengartner, 2000). Due to the importance of apoptosis in the immune response, poxviruses developed several anti-apoptotic strategies to disrupt it (Everett and McFadden, 2002). In order to survive, viruses contain many proteins that interfere with apoptosis at various points (Elmore, 2007). Previous study data however indicate that NOXA and caspase-3 were upregulated, while Bcl-2, PUMA, and PAK2 were downregulated in monkeypox virus, which is consistent with apoptosis induction (Alkhalil et al., 2010). Apoptosis-specific genes are underregulated in cells infected with monkeypox virus, whereas anti-apoptotic outcomes are observed in other poxvirus infected cells, suggesting that monkeypox virus infects cells in a way that is anti-apoptotic via a mechanism downstream from apoptosis initiation (Nichols et al., 2017). Although monkeypox virus genes involved in blocking apoptosis are unknown, still data suggest that an orthologs of the vaccinia virus (F1L) gene functions in the same manner as Bcl-2 by directly targeting mitochondria (Alkhalil et al., 2010).

Also, studies suggest that expression of histone, modification in histone posttranslational, and chromatin dynamic exchanges play an important role in host-poxvirus interactions (Alkhalil et al., 2010; Nichols et al., 2017). Moreover, studies introduced signaling components that regulate actin cytoskeletal dynamics as infection-regulated genes which further helps in regulating microtubule signaling. A membrane-associated protein encoded by the intersection 1 gene (SH3 domain protein) is said to be closely related to actin assembly machinery that controls endocytic membrane traffic. Morphological differentiation and cell motility are also affected by Rho-effector ROCK1, which is also closely related to cytoskeletal dynamics. As well as RAS p21 protein activator, homolog of oncogene from v-Ki-rat sarcoma virus and SOS2 are found essential in polymerizing actin filaments and reorganizing the cytoskeleton (McGlade et al., 1993; Giancotti and Ruoslahti, 1999; Pawlak and Helfman, 2002; Scaife et al., 2003; Alkhalil et al., 2010).

Studies also suggest that genes related to ion channels were impacted by monkeypox virus infection in an intriguing and novel manner. A total of ten genes that encode nine ion channels and a transporter were suppressed as infection progressed. A large number of these channels are located on the membrane of the cell in order to maintain its osmolarity homeostasis and cell membrane potential. Modulation mechanisms of transport, such as indirect consequences of Ras, Rho, and Rab GTPases, have been described, but their impact on viral infections and global cell biology continues to be unclear. However, there has been a report found describing how myxoma poxvirus protein M11L hinders apoptosis by interacting with mitochondrial permeability transition pores (Everett et al., 2002; Pochynyuk et al., 2007).

6 Monkeypox: A serious global health threat?

The monkeypox virus, is a public health concern since it can be transmitted from infected individuals, animals and contaminated substances. A number of countries that are non-endemic were reported to have monkeypox in May 2022 (Bunge et al., 2022). According to our discussion above, monkeypox lethality varies across Africa, suggesting its growing threat. Also, the current outbreak of monkeypox virus infection in humans suggests that biological aspects of virus, human behavior or both, have changed (Quarleri et al., 2022). A number of factors may have contributed to these changes, including the decline in smallpox immunity, the relaxed prevention measures for COVID -19, the resumption of international travel, the change in sexual interaction, and the presence of large gatherings in large numbers (Vaughan et al., 2018; Monkeypox update from AR Dept. of health - Arkansas medical society, 2022; Sharma V. et al., 2022; Thornhill et al., 2022). In the course of time, all viruses change and evolve despite this, monkeypox viruses mutate more slowly than COVID-19 virus (León-Figueroa et al., 2022). Currently, many studies are being conducted to understand the epidemiology, sources, and patterns of infection (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022; Ligon, 2004; Erez et al., 2019; Yong et al., 2020). Out of which study conducted in African countries by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control estimates that immunocompromised people, children, and young adults are at higher risk of death (Dhawan et al., 2022). This outbreak reported total of 55 deaths until know among various geographical areas (Figure 3C).

Policy makers and government officials also need to understand public opinion regarding the health crisis in order to develop health policies for monitoring and controlling it. So, in order to determine public attitudes towards the monkeypox virus, an analysis was conducted on 27, June, 2022 using techniques of advanced machine learning, particularly technique of Natural Language Processing (NLP). Intriguingly, the analysis results indicate that more people are posting positively about the monkeypox virus on social media (28.82%) than posting negatively about it (23.11%). When examining the tweets more closely, most positive tweets about monkeypox was that this virus is not severe and there is a low death rate caused by the disease. There are only few tweets about monkeypox that have negative sentiments suggesting that public hasn’t panicked that much about the virus, and that too negative comments are of people discussing death caused by monkeypox, virus severity, infections caused due to it, whether it can be transmitted, vaccines available, whether it will be the next pandemic after COVID-19, if it is safe to travel, if it will affect the schools functioning, and whether it will affect the people lives. In light of the early stages of this epidemic, researchers and policymakers can use this study to better understand public concerns about monkeypox and develop effective awareness programs and control the outbreak so that general public concerns can be addressed. In order to raise awareness about the ongoing outbreak, it is imperative to teach the general public what the disease symptoms are and when to seek medical attention (Farahat et al., 2022; Sv and Ittamalla, 2022).

7 Transmission

Over the past several years, numerous outbreaks of emerging infectious viral diseases originating from zoonotic animals including MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, H7N9 (avian influenza), chikungunya virus, ebola virus, dengue virus, and Japanese encephalitis virus, which all are highly pathogenic have been reported. From time to time, international travelers reported to spread these viruses. SARS-CoV-2 was spread across countries largely due to international travel. In some non-African countries, monkeypox outbreaks have been reported recently. As of now, there are no links between monkeypox endemic areas and travel found in the current scenario. It is imperative to investigate the root cause of the current outbreaks as soon as possible. Furthermore, the focus must be placed on determining the zoonotic reservoir, zoonosis, spill overs from the host, etc., of this virus. Despite a lack of association between monkeypox outbreaks and air travel, it might be more likely that the disease will spread as a result of air travel as it is a contagious disease (Morens and Fauci, 2020; Wells et al., 2020; Bhattacharya et al., 2022; Bryer et al., 2022; Sharma R. et al., 2022; Begum et al., 2023; Varghese et al., 2023a).

A person who suffers from monkeypox can transmit it to others from the time period of beginning of symptoms until the complete healing of rash and formation of fresh skin layer (Farahat et al., 2022; Soriano and Corral, 2022; Vivancos et al., 2022; Zambrano et al., 2022). The possible causes for anyone to contract monkeypox up to its clinical manifestation are described in Figure 4. In addition to it, placental transmission can also spread the virus to a fetus while a mother is pregnant. Current spread has disproportionately affected gay, men who have sexual relations with men and bisexual men by developing a vesicular pustular rash or lesions on genital, suggesting that sexual networks are amplifying transmission and close contact is believed to constitute a reason of disease transmission (Farahat et al., 2022). This rash typically occurs on the perennial area and genitals, suggesting that it was transmitted sexually, but it can be mistaken for molluscum contagiosum, chancre, herpes simplex infection or granuloma inguinal (Farahat et al., 2022; Soriano and Corral, 2022; Vivancos et al., 2022; Zambrano et al., 2022).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Transmission, pathophysiology and symptoms of monkeypox.

Moreover, infected human fecal sample can also contain monkeypox virus DNA, according to a recent small study, which may provide yet another potential route for viral transmission. Since some animals (such as rodents) might be infected with the virus as they consume human waste that is laden with the virus, thus causing new infected wild animal populations to establish themselves in traditionally non-endemic areas (Murphy and Ly, 2022; Peiro-Mestres et al., 2022).

Researchers are investigating whether monkeypox can be spread when a person does not have symptoms, or if people with monkeypox symptoms are more likely to spread the virus, and also to determine if the virus is spread more easily through feces, semen, vaginal fluid, or urine of symptomatic patient. To date, the disease seems to be having difficulties spreading effectively, however, the possibility that it can be transmitted through intimate or sexual contact ought to alarm infectious disease specialists in conducting further research to determine how the disease spreads so it can be prevented from spreading worldwide (Zambrano et al., 2022).

8 Clinical manifestation

Most monkeypox cases are self-limiting, with clinical manifestation as detailed in Figure 4. In children, complications are more likely to occur if they have been exposed to a high level of virus exposure, they have a poor health status, and they have complications of a severe nature. There is a possibility that underlying immune deficiencies will result in worse outcomes. In spite of vaccination against smallpox being protective in the past, now that campaigns of smallpox vaccination have stopped since the disease was eradicated globally, young people may be more susceptible to monkeypox. In monkeypox, lymphadenopathy distinguishes it from other similar diseases (chickenpox, measles, smallpox) and the skin eruption usually appears within 1-3 days of the fever onset. The rash can manifest as a pimple or blister and may be itchy or painful. Some patients may experience all symptoms at once, whereas others may experience only a few. Also, it affects the mucous membranes of the oral cavity, the genitalia and the conjunctiva. The disease begins with macules (flat lesions) then progresses to papules (slightly raised firm lesions), pustules (fluid filled yellow lesions), vesicles (fluid-filled clear lesions) and crusts that fall off over time. In some cases, there can be few to several thousand lesions. Severe cases can result in large areas of skin sloughing off caused by the coalescence of lesions (MacNeil et al., 2009; Adler et al., 2022; European Medicines Agency, 2022; Gilbourne et al., 2022; Monkeypox: What to know, 2022).

Asymptomatic infection may occur in some cases, but it is not known to what extent. In the general population, monkeypox has historically had a case fatality rate between 0 and 11%, with a higher rate among younger children. Recent years have seen a 3–6% case fatality rate (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, 2020).

As a result of monkeypox associated encephalitis, patients often experience pharyngitis, fever, anorexia, headache, weakness, adenopathy, and a vesiculo-papular rash. A very slow electroencephalogram and diffuse oedema found on cortical magnetic resonance imaging were associated with amplification of meninges in the thalamus and partial cortex as well as signal abnormalities. However, within 5-6 days polymorphonuclear pleocytosis in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may decrease and primarily consist of lymphocytes (Shafaati and Zandi, 2022).

9 Differential diagnosis

When considering the differential diagnosis, other rash illnesses should also be considered, such as measles, chickenpox, scabies, bacterial infections, and medications associated allergies. When monkeypox is in its prodromal stage, lymphadenopathy distinguishes it from chickenpox or smallpox (World Health Organization, 2022).

A monkeypox sample must be collected by health workers and transported safely to a laboratory that has the necessary capabilities if monkeypox is suspected. A laboratory test and the type of specimen determine whether monkeypox is confirmed or not. It is therefore imperative that specimens are packaged and shipped must comply with international and national regulations. In terms of accuracy and sensitivity, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the preferred laboratory test. Ideally, monkeypox diagnostic samples should come from skin lesions such as vesicles, pustules, and crusts. Biopsies can be performed where feasible. Keeping lesions cold and storing them in dry and sterile tubes (no viral transport media) is essential. But, due to the short duration of viremia, blood tests for PCR are usually inconclusive and should not be routinely conducted in patients of monkeypox after symptoms begin (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, 2020).

Also, serological cross-reactivity between orthopoxviruses makes antibody and antigen detection method ineffective from providing monkeypox specific confirmation. Hence it is not recommended to use serology or antigen detection methods for case investigation where resources are limited. Furthermore, a false positive result may also result from recent vaccination with an orthopoxvirus vaccine (e.g. those vaccinated before smallpox eradication or more recently due to a higher risk). So, for interpretation of test results, patient symptoms information must be included with specimens (Reed et al., 2004; Reynolds et al., 2006; Dubois and Slifka, 2008). It may be helpful to detect orthopoxvirus induced encephalitis. A CSF IgM reaction against orthopoxvirus may help detect encephalitis caused by orthopoxvirus (Sejvar et al., 2004).

10 Prevention strategies

Educating people about risk factors and ways to reduce exposure is the primary strategy for preventing monkeypox (Figure 5). Research is currently being conducted to determine whether vaccination is an appropriate and feasible preventative or control measure against monkeypox. To protect the public’s health, it is important to investigate all possible modes of transmission since the source of this outbreak is still being investigated. Many countries have or developing policies that offer vaccines to health workers, laboratory personnel, and rapid response teams who may be at risk (Health ministry issues guidelines for monkeypox management - the statesman, 2022).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 Representing prevention and treatment of monkeypox.

Also to reduce the risk of transmission between humans, surveillance and rapid detection of new cases are crucial for outbreak containment. Standard infection control precautions should be followed by health workers caring for patients or handling specimens from those patients with monkeypox virus infection. The patient should be cared for by persons previously vaccinated against smallpox if possible. Make sure you are using appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when caring for those with symptoms, including gloves, a mask, and a gown. Personnel who are trained and equipped with the proper equipment should handle samples suspected of being infected with monkeypox virus. According to WHO guidelines for transporting infectious substances, patient specimens must be packaged triple to ensure their safety (Health ministry issues guidelines for monkeypox management - the statesman, 2022). Keep your sexual partner/s informed about any recent illness, including sores or rashes, and avoid close contact with anyone who has symptoms such as sores or rashes. To reduce the risk of a resurgence of infection, a 21-day self-isolation period and other preventive measures have been implemented UK Health Security Agency, 2022.

Furthermore to prevent monkeypox, some countries have enacted regulations restricting rodent and non-human primate importation. Monkeypox infected captive animals or that might have come into contact with them should be quarantined immediately, handle with standard precautions, and observed for 30 days to monitor monkeypox symptoms (Health ministry issues guidelines for monkeypox management - the statesman, 2022).

11 Therapeutics

A specific treatment does not exist for monkeypox viral infections. Monkeypox and smallpox viruses have genetic similarities, so smallpox related antiviral drugs and vaccines may be effective against monkeypox. It is essential that patients receive fluids and food in order to maintain a healthy nutritional status and infections caused by secondary bacteria should be treated accordingly (Health ministry issues guidelines for monkeypox management - the statesman, 2022).

Tecovirimat, an antiviral agent previously approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for smallpox, has been now approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for treatment of monkeypox after animal and human studies. Tecovirimat (previously ST-246), a small molecule that inhibits viral egress, has been demonstrated to be effective against vaccinia, cowpox, camelpox, ectromelia (mousepox), and variola viruses (Yang et al., 2005). Through screening of more than 350,000 compounds, tecovirimat was discovered to target a gene that produces p37, an envelope protein essential for extracellular virus production (Bolken and Hruby, 2010). In mice, tecovirimat was proven to be effective and safe when administered orally twice daily at 50 mg/kg of body weight for 14 days before or shortly after infection. When used at a concentration (EC50) of ≤0.07 μM, it suppresses viral multiplication by 50% in in vitro (Quenelle et al., 2007). In a ground squirrel model of disease, tecovirimat was effective in saving all animals that were given the drug on days 0, 1, 2, and 3; in contrast, all animals in the placebo group died (Nalca et al., 2008). It was clear from these findings that further human studies were necessary. In patients with weakened immune systems, antivirals such as tecovirimat may be helpful in preventing severe illness. If tecovirimat will be used for patient care, WHO recommends monitoring it in a clinical research setting and have prospective data collection (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022; World Health Organization, 2022). Recently, Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials involving an oral formulation of it was funded by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID and Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), part of the USA Department of Health and Human Services (NIH: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 2022).

Monkeypox can be prevented through vaccination if administered before or soon after exposure. There are currently two monkeypox vaccines available in the USA through the Strategic National Stockpile: JYNNEOS and ACAM2000. For adults 18 years and older, JYNNEOS is licensed. At least four weeks apart, two doses have to be administered in the upper arm. Itching, redness and swelling are the most common reactions people have at the injection site after receiving the JYNNEOS vaccine. Public health has prioritized the JYNNEOS vaccine for the following groups: known close contacts of monkeypox cases identified by case investigations, tracing of contact, and assessments of risk exposure, and for individuals who attended an event where monkeypox was present. Advisory committee on immunization practices(ACIP) also recommends monkeypox vaccinations for laboratory and clinical workers who conduct monkeypox testing and collect monkeypox specimens (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022). Moreover, European Union (EU) has also approved Imvanex as a vaccine against monkeypox disease as of 22 July 2022. Later, Imvanex has been authorized for the treatment of smallpox and vaccinia virus in the EU (European Medicines Agency, 2022).

Furthermore, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends administration of vaccinia immune globulin intravenous(VIGIV), cidofovir and Bricidofovir to treat monkeypox. Earlier, VIGIV was used for treating complications caused by vaccinating against vaccinia, such as generalized vaccinia severe, eczema vaccinatum, vaccinia infections among skin diseases, progressive vaccinia and aberrant infections caused by vaccinia virus (except in isolated cases of keratitis). And as an antiviral, FDA has approved cidofovir to treat cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis among AIDS patients and Bricidofovir for treating smallpox in adults and children, including neonates since June, 4, 2021. There is a possibility that Bricidofovir has a better safety profile than cidofovir. There have been no serious renal toxic effects or other adverse reactions associated with Bricidofovir treatment for cytomegalovirus infection (Figure 5). Dose and possible mechanism of these vaccines are represented in Figure 6 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6 Representing mechanism and dose of various monkeypox treatments.

Despite their effectiveness in animal studies against orthopoxviruses, no data indicate that they are effective in humans infected with monkeypox virus. Patients with severe T-cell deficiencies and who are contraindicated from smallpox vaccination after monkeypox exposure should take VIGIV. Cidofovir or brincidofovir should be given to treat monkeypox outbreaks in patients who have severe immunodeficiency (Kugelman et al., 2014; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022). All these vaccines suggested to be used in monkeypox should be further clinically proved.

12 In silico findings: Possible drug targets

In silico studies have shown that the genome of monkeypox are identical to the central regions that encode essential enzymes and proteins to the genome of smallpox. Despite the fact that monkeypox genome nomenclature resembles universal nomenclature, certain regions differ encoding for virulence. There is a great deal of research being done on the vaccinia virus, as it is used in vaccinations against other types of poxviruses and has lower risk than smallpox. Each of the three agents of monkeypox, smallpox, and vaccinia has nearly 197, 186, and 190kb of genome size respectively. The genomes of all poxviruses are linear and have double-stranded DNAs. Since other poxvirus homologues have similar characteristics and naming problems, the authors of that study refer to their targets by the universal nomenclature gene name based on the vaccinia nomenclature. A50R, A48R, D13L protein trimer complex, F13L, and E are five poxvirus targets examined in that study. A number of studies and reviews have proposed that I7L be used as a useful target for intervention. Based on these targets, an in silico study was conducted on the active residues of monkeypox and eight potential repurposable drugs were identified. In this list of eight drugs, they find nilotinib for A50R, rutaecarpine and NMCT for A48R, naldemedine and hypericin for F13L, simeprevir for D13L, and lixivaptan and fosdagrocorat for I7L. As the drugs show promise in an in silico model, they should also be tested in clinical trials to see if they can combat disease effectively (Prazsák et al., 2018; Senkevich et al., 2021; Akash et al., 2023; Varghese et al., 2023b).

13 Case studies and therapeutic intervention

Few case studies cases pertaining to this outbreak of monkeypox available online are discussed below in Table 2 to understand the presentation and treatment provided. It is crucial for health authorities and clinicians to take into account the diagnosis of monkeypox in all patients, as cases in which patients have other sexually transmitted infections make it difficult to diagnose. For this reason, clinicians should always test suspected cases for monkeypox as part of their differential diagnosis. Further, it was noticed that antibiotics, antivirals and analgesics are given to these patients and recovery is shown. Although, this data is insufficient to propose any valid treatment, but these leads can be taken in consideration and validate in more number of patients. Also there are 8 studies yet found to be registered at clinicaltrial.gov that are related to monkeypox. The studies are compiled in Table 3. Among them are three interventional studies (IMVAMUNE®, ST-246, MVA vaccine (IMVANEX® and JYNNEOS®)), four observational studies, and one study to expand access to tecovirimat. Recruitment of patients are still ongoing for the studies (Search of: Monkeypox - list results - ClinicalTrials.gov, 2022). In future, the findings of these studies will hopefully provide some scientific results.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Overview of the clinical course and outcome of cases from recent outbreak of monkeypox.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 Representing data of case studies on monkeypox registered with clinicaltrial.gov.

14 Possible plant-based strategies and probable mechanism involved to manage upcoming monkeypox cases

Besides providing scaffolding for cells and facilitating cellular long-distance traffic, microtubules serve as important components of multiple biological processes. It is astounding that viruses are often able to move actively into cells by using the cytoskeleton transportation machinery. As part of their replication cycle, viruses often interact with the cytoskeleton and require an intact microtubule network. Microtubule-dependent motors are involved in transporting intact virions and capsids to replication sites and exiting replication sites to the plasma membrane for some viruses. Upon maturation of the endosomes, some viruses move along microtubules with a characteristic vesicular motion that targets either kinesins or dyneins. Pharmacological modulation of microtubules has been hypothesized to interfere with virus replication and spread, demonstrating their potential as broad-spectrum antivirals. In contrast, an pharmacological interventions against viral infections must be tightly controlled in order to prevent the compromise of physiological functions of cells. Therefore, we suggest microtubule targeting agents to inhibit viral replication in monkeypox (Figure 7) (Vale, 1987; Gundersen and Cook, 1999; Ridley et al., 2003; Khodjakov and Rieder, 2009; Mogilner and Keren, 2009; van der Vaart et al., 2009; Stehbens and Wittmann, 2012; Zulkipli et al., 2015).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7 Representing possible leads constituents to mitigate monkeypox by microtubule inhibiting candidate.

Compounds targeted at microtubules from natural sources and synthetic compounds such as Colchicine, Nocodazole, Vinblastine, Paclitaxel, Vincristine, Podophyllotoxin, Combretastatins, Noscapine, Vindesine, Vinorelbine, Vinflunine, Docetaxel, Cabazitaxel, Larotaxel, Tesetaxel, Ombrabulin, Fosbretabulin, Crolibulin and Verubulin are potent antiviral leads that can also be an effective treatment for monkeypox (Kaul et al., 2019).

Also, the traditional use of several plant species and their extracts investigated for their antiviral properties has been documented. An array of plant extracts including Pterocaulon sphacelatum, Dianella longifolia var. grandis, Euphorbia australis, Scaevola spinescens, Pittosporum phylliraeoides var. Microcarpa, Azadirachta indica, Eremophila latrobei subsp. Glabra, Opuntia streptacantha, Nerium indicum, Bergenia ligulata and Holoptelia integrifolia exhibited antiviral effects towards a variety of DNA viruses in experimental models. The fact that monkeypox is a DNA virus makes it a viable candidate for inhibiting actions of these herbs (Semple et al., 1998; Abubakar et al., 2022). Furthermore, a study suggests that Acacia nilotica (L.) Delile, Adansonia digitata L., Aframomum melegueta K. Schum., Allium sativum L., Alstonia boonei De Wild, Anogeissus leiocarpus (DC.) Guill. & Perr., Azadirachta indica A. Juss., Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) Delile, Calotropis procera (Aiton) Dryand, Carica papaya, Cissus populnea Guill. & Perr., Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai, Combretum micranthum G. Don., Detarium senegalense J.F. Gmel., Diospyros mespiliformis Hochst. ex A.DC., Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn., Euphorbia hirta L, Ficus platyphylla Delile, Ficus polita Vahl, Guiera senegalensis J.F. Gmel., Lagenaria breviflora (Benth.) Roberty, Lawsonia inermis L, Mangifera indica, Maytenus senegalensis (Lam.) Exell, Momordica charantia L., Moringa oleifera Lam., Nigella sativa L., Olea europea L, Parinari macrophylla Sabine, Piper guineense Schumach. & Thonn., Sterculia setigera Delile, Tamarindus indica, Terminalia avicenoides Guill. & Perr., Vernonia amygdalina, Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn, Viscum album L. and Ziziphus mauritiana Lam. were among the most commonly used plants for treating monkey pox in different country regions. As of now, monkeypox does not have a well-established and proven treatment. It is therefore essential to evaluate the molecular mechanism underlying these plant-based treatments and to verify their pharmacological claims in different experimental models as to their ability to mitigate monkeypox virus (Jassim and Naji, 2003).

15 Conclusion and future perspectives

Each day, a growing number of monkeypox cases are reported, and more cases are expected in the near future. Most cases have been found among men, of whom several are gay or bisexual. A rash was the most common symptom that drove patients to seek medical attention. For the first time, a chain of transmission has been reported in Europe without any epidemiological connection to West or Central Africa. As compared to the Central African strain (ZAI-96), the nucleotide sequences of the three West African strains (SL-V70, COP-58, and WRAIR-61) differ by only 0.55-0.56%. BR-203, BR-209, and COP-C3L orthologs may play a role in the virulence differences between the strains. Multiple molecular mechanisms are stated in this study which explain how monkeypox viruses produce symptoms such as apoptosis by NOXA and caspase-3 upregulation, Bcl-2, PUMA, and PAK2 downregulation, targeting mitochondria, expression of histone, modification of histone posttranslational, dynamic exchanges of chromatin, packaging of DNA, ROCK1 and actin components regulating cytoskeletal dynamics. In order to reduce the risk of future outbreaks, it is imperative to act quickly and stop community transmission. Several key features need to be acknowledged and addressed if we hope to prevent monkeypox and minimize unintentional harms. Additionally, it is likely that an early cluster is responsible for the most cases among men who have sexual relationship with men in the current outbreak It is important to identify monkeypox cases early so that officials of public health can identify potential contacts, their vulnerability, isolate them appropriately, keep track of symptoms, and possibly administer vaccinations. Whenever dermatologists are able to evaluate a patient with papulo-vesiculo-pustular or vesiculo-pustular lesions, should be evaluated for presence of monkeypox. If a diagnosis is suspected or confirmed, public health systems should be contacted quickly. Public health authorities should therefore support those exposed to monkeypox or quarantined monkeypox patients, especially because the pathogen has a prolonged incubation period and is infectious for a long period of time. Studies have revealed the possible plants-based leads to mitigate the monkeypox. These leads should attract the attention and more studies to validate these treatments to help mitigating monkeypox pandemic.

Author contributions

RuS, writing – original draft and formal analysis. K-TC, editing. RoS, conceptualization, editing and supervision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant (no. RA112001) from the Tainan Municipal Hospital (managed by Show Chwan Medical Care Corporation), Tainan, Taiwan.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Banaras Hindu University for their kind support and facilities provided.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Abubakar, I. B., Kankara, S. S., Malami, I., Danjuma, J. B., Muhammad, Y. Z., Yahaya, H., et al. (2022). Traditional medicinal plants used for treating emerging and re-emerging viral diseases in northern Nigeria. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 49, 102094. doi: 10.1016/J.EUJIM.2021.102094

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Adler, H., Gould, S., Hine, P., Snell, L. B., Wong, W., Houlihan, C. F., et al. (2022). Clinical features and management of human monkeypox: a retrospective observational study in the UK. Lancet Infect. Dis. 22(8), 1153–1162 doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00228-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Akash, S., Islam, M. R., Rahman, M. M., Hossain, M. S., Azad, M. A. K., Sharma, R. (2023). Investigation of the new inhibitors by modified derivatives of pinocembrin for the treatment of monkeypox and marburg virus with different computational approaches. Biointerface. Res. Appl. Chem. 13(6), 534. doi: 10.33263/BRIAC136.534

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alkhalil, A., Hammamieh, R., Hardick, J., Ichou, M. A., Jett, M., Ibrahim, S. (2010). “Gene expression profiling of monkeypox virus-infected cells reveals novel interfaces for host-virus interactions,”. Virol. J. 7, 173. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-7-173

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Al-Tawfiq, J. A., Barry, M., Memish, Z. A. (2022). International outbreaks of monkeypox virus infection with no established travel: A public health concern with significant knowledge gap. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 49, 102364. doi: 10.1016/J.TMAID.2022.102364

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anderson, M. G., Frenkel, L. D., Homann, S., Guffey, J. (2003). A case of severe monkeypox virus disease in an American child: emerging infections and changing professional values. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 22 (12), 1093–1096. doi: 10.1097/01.INF.0000101821.61387.A5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

As monkeypox surges, WHO urges reducing number of sexual partners. (2022). Health news | Al Jazeera. Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/7/27/as-monkeypox-surges-who-urges-reducing-number-of-sexual-partners (Accessed Aug. 13, 2022).

Google Scholar

Search of: Monkeypox - list results - ClinicalTrials.gov. (2022). Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=Monkeypox&term=&cntry=&state=&city=&dist (Accessed Aug. 12, 2022).

Google Scholar

Beer, E. M., Bhargavi Rao, V. (2019). A systematic review of the epidemiology of human monkeypox outbreaks and implications for outbreak strategy. PloS Negl. Trop. Dis. 13 (10), e0007791. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0007791

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Begum, J. P. S., Ngangom, L., Semwal, P., Painuli, S., Sharma, R., Gupta, A. (2023). Emergence of monkeypox: a worldwide public health crisis. Hum. Cell. 7, 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s13577-023-00870-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, M., Dhama, K., Chakraborty, C. (2022). Recently spreading human monkeypox virus infection and its transmission during COVID-19 pandemic period: A travelers’ prospective. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 49, 102398. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102398

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bížová, B., Veselý, D., Trojánek, M. (2022). And f. rob, “Coinfection of syphilis and monkeypox in HIV positive man in Prague, Czech republic,”. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 49, 102368. doi: 10.1016/J.TMAID.2022.102368

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bolken, T. C., Hruby, D. E. (2010). Tecovirimat for smallpox infections,”. Drugs Today (Barc). 46 (2), 109–117. doi: 10.1358/DOT.2010.46.2.1437244

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Breman, J. G., Kalisa-Ruti, Steniowski, M. V., Zanotto, E., Gromyko, A. I., Arita, I. (1980). Human monkeypox, 1970-79. Bull. World Health Organ 58 (2), 165.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Bryer, J. S., Freeman, E. E., Rosenbach, M. (2022). Monkeypox emerges on a global scale: A historical review and dermatologic primer. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 87(5), 1069–1074. doi: 10.1016/J.JAAD.2022.07.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bunge, E. M., Hoet, B., Chen, L., Lienert, F., Weidenthaler, H., Baer, L. R., et al. (2022). The changing epidemiology of human monkeypox–a potential threat? a systematic review. PloS Negl. Trop. Dis. 16 (2), e0010141. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0010141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carter, G. C., Law, M., Hollinshead, M., Smith, G. L. (2005). Entry of the vaccinia virus intracellular mature virion and its interactions with glycosaminoglycans. J. Gen. Virol. 86 (5), 1279–1290. doi: 10.1099/VIR.0.80831-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (1997). Human monkeypox – Kasai oriental, democratic republic of Congo, February 1996-October 1997. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 46 (49), 1168–1171.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2003a). Multistate outbreak of monkeypox-Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 52 (23), 537–40.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2003b) Update: Multistate outbreak of monkeypox — Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 52 (27), 642–646.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2022). Clinical recognition. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/clinicians/clinical-recognition.html (Accessed Aug. 13, 2022).

Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). U.S. monkeypox outbreak. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/response/2022/index.html (Accessed Aug. 12, 2022).

Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Patient’s Guide to Mpox Treatment with Tecovirimat. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/treatment.html (Accessed Aug. 14, 2022).

Google Scholar

Chen, N., Li, G., Liszewski, M. K., Atkinson, J. P., Jahrling, P. B., Feng, Z., et al. (2005). Virulence differences between monkeypox virus isolates from West Africa and the Congo basin. Virology 340 (1), 46–63. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.05.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Comparative pathology of north American and central African strains of monkeypox virus in a ground squirrel model of the disease. (2022). PubMed. (Accessed Aug. 13, 2022).

Google Scholar

Dhawan, M., Priyanka, Choudhary, O. P. (2022). Emergence of monkeypox: Risk assessment and containment measures. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 49, 102392. doi: 10.1016/J.TMAID.2022.102392

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dubois, M. E., Slifka, M. K. (2008). Retrospective analysis of monkeypox infection. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 14 (4), 592. doi: 10.3201/EID1404.071044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Elmore, S. (2007). Apoptosis: A review of programmed cell death. Toxicol. Pathol. 35 (4), 495. doi: 10.1080/01926230701320337

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Elsevier – clinical overviews. (2022). Monkeypox. Available at: https://elsevier.health/en-US/preview/monkeypox-co (Accessed Aug. 13, 2022).

Google Scholar

Erez, N., Achdout, H., Milrot, E., Schwartz, Y., Wiener-Well, Y., Paran, N., et al. (2019). Diagnosis of imported monkeypox, Israel, 2018. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 25 (5), 980–983. doi: 10.3201/EID2505.190076

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

European Medicines Agency. (2022). Monkeypox | European Medicines Agency. Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/overview/public-health-threats/monkeypox#availability-of-critical-medicines-(new)-section (Accessed Aug. 12, 2022).

Google Scholar

Everett, H., Barry, M., Sun, X., Lee, S. F., Frantz, C., Berthiaume, L. G., et al. (2002). The myxoma poxvirus protein, M11L, prevents apoptosis by direct interaction with the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. J. Exp. Med. 196 (9), 1127–1139. doi: 10.1084/JEM.20011247

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Everett, H., McFadden, G. (2002). Poxviruses and apoptosis: a time to die. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 5 (4), 395–402. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00340-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farahat, R. A., Ali, I., Al-Ahdal, T., Benmelouka, A. Y., Albakri, K., El-Sakka, A. A., et al. (2022). Monkeypox and human transmission: Are we on the verge of another pandemic? Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 49, 102387. doi: 10.1016/J.TMAID.2022.102387

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farahat, R. A., Sah, R., El-Sakka, A. A., Benmelouka, A. Y., Kundu, M., Labieb, F., et al. (2022). Human monkeypox disease (MPX). Infez Med. 30 (3), 372–391. doi: 10.53854/liim-3003-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fenner, F., Henderson, D. A., Arita, I., Jezek, Z., Ladnyi, I. D. (1988)‎. Smallpox and its eradication‎. World Health Organization. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/39485 (Accessed Aug. 12, 2022).

Google Scholar

Formenty, P., Muntasir, M. O., Damon, I., Chowdhary, V., Opoka, M. L., Monimart, C., et al. (2010). Human monkeypox outbreak caused by novel virus belonging to Congo basin clade, Sudan, 2005. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 16 (10), 1539–1545. doi: 10.3201/eid1610.100713

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Giancotti, F. G., Ruoslahti, E. (1999). Integrin signaling. Sci. (80-.). 285 (5430), 1028–1032. doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.285.5430.1028

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gilbourne, M., Coulson, I., Mitchell, G. (2022) Monkeypox: Symptoms, treatment, and outcome — DermNet. Available at: https://dermnetnz.org/topics/monkeypox (Accessed Aug. 12, 2022). dermnetnz.org.

Google Scholar

Gundersen, G. G., Cook, T. A. (1999). Microtubules and signal transduction,”. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11 (1), 81–94. doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(99)80010-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Health ministry issues guidelines for monkeypox management - the statesman. (2022). Available at: https://www.thestatesman.com/india/health-ministry-issues-guidelines-monkeypox-management-1503090385.html (Accessed Aug. 13, 2022).

Google Scholar

Hengartner, M. O. (2000). The biochemistry of apoptosis. Nat 407 (6805), 770–776. doi: 10.1038/35037710

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huhn, G. D., Bauer, A. M., Yorita, K., Graham, M. B., Sejvar, J., Likos, A., et al. (2005). Clinical characteristics of human monkeypox, and risk factors for severe disease. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41 (12), 1742–1751. doi: 10.1086/498115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hutson, C. L., Lee, K. N., Abel, J., Carroll, D. S., Montgomery, J. M., Olson, V. A., et al. (2007). Monkeypox zoonotic associations: insights from laboratory evaluation of animals associated with the multi-state US outbreak. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 76 (4), 757–68.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Hutson, C. L., Olson, V. A., Carroll, D. S., Abel, J. A., Hughes, C. M., Braden, Z. H., et al. (2009). A prairie dog animal model of systemic orthopoxvirus disease using West African and Congo basin strains of monkeypox virus. J. Gen. Virol. 90 (Pt 2), 323–333. doi: 10.1099/VIR.0.005108-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jassim, S. A. A., Naji, M. A. (2003). Novel antiviral agents: a medicinal plant perspective. J. Appl. Microbiol. 95 (3), 412–427. doi: 10.1046/J.1365-2672.2003.02026.X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jezek, Z., Fenner, F. (1988). Human monkeypox, monographs in virology. Monographs Virol. 17, 127–134.

Google Scholar

Jezek, Z., Grab, B., Szczeniowski, M. V., Paluku, K. M., Mutombo, M. (1988). Human monkeypox: secondary attack rates. Bull. World Health Organ. 66 (4), 465.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Ježek, Z., Szczeniowski, M., Paluku, K. M., Mutombo, M. (1987). Human monkeypox: clinical features of 282 patients. J. Infect. Dis. 156 (2), 293–298. doi: 10.1093/INFDIS/156.2.293

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kantele, A., Chickering, K., Vapalahti, O., Rimoin, A. W. (2016). Emerging diseases–the monkeypox epidemic in the democratic republic of the Congo. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 22 (8), 658–659. doi: 10.1016/J.CMI.2016.07.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaul, R., Risinger, A. L., Mooberry, S. L. (2019). Microtubule-targeting drugs: More than antimitotics,”. J. Nat. Prod. 82 (3), 680–685. doi: 10.1021/ACS.JNATPROD.9B00105/ASSET/IMAGES/MEDIUM/NP-2019-00105P_0002.GIF

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khodakevich, L., Jezek, Z., Kinzanzka, K. (1986). ISOLATION OF MONKEYPOX VIRUS FROM WILD SQUIRREL INFECTED IN NATURE. Lancet 327 (8472), 98–99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90748-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khodjakov, A., Rieder, C. L. L. (2009). Mitosis: too much of a good thing (can be bad). Curr. Biol. 19 (22), R1032–R1034. doi: 10.1016/J.CUB.2009.10.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kozlov, M. (2018). 1053131562.

Google Scholar

Kraemer, M. U.G., Tegally, H., Pigott, D. M., Dasgupta, A., Sheldon, J., Wilkinson, E., et al. (2022). Tracking the 2022 monkeypox outbreak with epidemiological data in real-time. Lancet Infect. Dis. 22 (7), 941–942. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00359-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kugelman, J. R., Johnston, S. C., Mulembakani, P. M., Kisalu, N., Lee, M. S., Koroleva, G., et al. (2014). Genomic variability of monkeypox virus among humans, democratic republic of the Congo - volume 20, number 2–February 2014 - emerging infectious diseases journal - CDC. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20 (2), 232–239. doi: 10.3201/EID2002.130118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ladnyj, I. D., Ziegler, P., Kima, E. (1972). A human infection caused by monkeypox virus in basankusu territory, democratic republic of the Congo. Bull. World Health Organ. 46 (5), 593.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Lai, C.-C., Hsu, C.-K., Yen, M.-Y., Lee, P.-I., Ko, W.-C., Hsueh, P.-R. (2022). Monkeypox: An emerging global threat during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 5(5), 787–794. doi: 10.1016/J.JMII.2022.07.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Learned, L. A., Reynolds, M. G., Wassa, D. W., Li, Y., Olson, V. A., Karem, K., et al. (2005). Extended interhuman transmission of monkeypox in a hospital community in the republic of the congo, 2003. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 73 (2), 428–434. doi: 10.4269/AJTMH.2005.73.428

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

León-Figueroa, D. A., Bonilla-Aldana, D. K., Pachar, M., Romaní, L., Saldaña-Cumpa, H. M., Anchay-Zuloeta, C., et al. (2022). The never-ending global emergence of viral zoonoses after COVID-19? the rising concern of monkeypox in Europe, north America and beyond. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 49, 102362. doi: 10.1016/J.TMAID.2022.102362

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ligon, B. L. (2004). Monkeypox: A review of the history and emergence in the Western hemisphere. Semin. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 15 (4), 280. doi: 10.1053/J.SPID.2004.09.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Likos, A. M., Sammons, S. A., Olson, V. A., Frace, A. M., Li, Y., Olsen-Rasmussen, M., et al. (2005). A tale of two clades: monkeypox viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 86 (Pt 10), 2661–2672. doi: 10.1099/VIR.0.81215-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luna, N., Ramírez, A. L., Muñoz, M., Ballesteros, N., Patiño, L. H., Castañeda, S. A., et al. (2022). Phylogenomic analysis of the monkeypox virus (MPXV) 2022 outbreak: Emergence of a novel viral lineage? Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 49, 102402. doi: 10.1016/J.TMAID.2022.102402

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luo, Q., Han, J. (2022). Preparedness for a monkeypox outbreak. Infect. Med. 1(2), 124–134. doi: 10.1016/J.IMJ.2022.07.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

MacNeil, A., Reynolds, M. G., Damon, I. K. (2009). Risks associated with vaccinia virus in the laboratory. Virology 385 (1), 1–4. doi: 10.1016/J.VIROL.2008.11.045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Massung, R. F., Liu, L. I., Qi, J., Knight, , et al. (1994). Analysis of the complete genome of smallpox variola major virus strain Bangladesh-1975. Virology 201 (2), 215–240. doi: 10.1006/VIRO.1994.1288

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McConnell, S. J., Herman, Y. F., Mattson, D. E., Erickson, L. (1962). Monkey pox disease in irradiated cynomologous monkeys. Nat 195 (4846), 1128–1129. doi: 10.1038/1951128a0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McGlade, J., Brunkhorst, B., Anderson, D., Mbamalu, G., Settleman, J., Dedhar, S., et al. (1993). The n-terminal region of GAP regulates cytoskeletal structure and cell adhesion. EMBO J. 12 (8), 3073–3081. doi: 10.1002/J.1460-2075.1993.TB05976.X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Merouze, F., Lesoin, J. J. (1983). [Monkeypox: second human case observed in Ivory Coast (rural health sector of Daloa]. Medecine tropicale : Revue du Corps de sante colonial 43 (2), 145–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Mileto, D., Riva, A., Cutrera, M., Moschese, D., Mancon, A., Meroni, L., et al. (2022). New challenges in human monkeypox outside Africa: A review and case report from Italy. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 49, 102386. doi: 10.1016/J.TMAID.2022.102386

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. (2020). Guidelines for management of monkeypox disease. Available at: Guidelines for Management of Monkeypox Disease.pdf (https://mohfw.gov.in).

Google Scholar

Mogilner, A., Keren, K. (2009). The shape of motile cells. Curr. Biol. 19 (17), PR762–R771. doi: 10.1016/J.CUB.2009.06.053

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Monkeypox: experts give virus variants new names. (2022). Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/12-08-2022-monkeypox–experts-give-virus-variants-new-names (Accessed Oct. 31, 2022).

Google Scholar

Multi-country monkeypox outbreak: situation update. (2022). Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2022-DON396 (Accessed Aug. 12, 2022).

Google Scholar

Monkeypox update from AR Dept. of health - Arkansas medical society. (2022). Available at: https://www.arkmed.org/news/2022/08/monkeypox-update-from-ar-dept-of-health/ (Accessed Aug. 13, 2022).

Google Scholar

Monkeypox: What to know. (2022). Available at: https://www.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/monkeypox-what-know (Accessed Aug. 12, 2022).

Google Scholar

Morens, D. M., Fauci, A. S. (2020). Emerging pandemic diseases: How we got to COVID-19. Cell 182 (5), 1077–1092. doi: 10.1016/J.CELL.2020.08.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moschese, D., Giacomelli, A., Beltrami, M., Pozza, G., Mileto, D., Reato, S., et al. (2022). Hospitalisation for monkeypox in Milan, Italy. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 49, 102417. doi: 10.1016/J.TMAID.2022.102417

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mukinda, V., Mwema, G., Kilundu, M., Heymann, D., Khan, A. S., Esposito, J. J., et al. (1997). Re-emergence of human monkeypox in Zaire in 1996. Lancet 349 (9063), 1449–1450. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)63725-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Murphy, H., Ly, H. (2022). The potential risks posed by inter- and intraspecies transmissions of monkeypox virus. Virulence 13 (1), 1681–1683. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2022.2127199

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nalca, A., et al. (2008). Evaluation of orally delivered ST-246 as postexposure prophylactic and antiviral therapeutic in an aerosolized rabbitpox rabbit model. Antiviral Res. 79 (2), 121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2008.03.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nalca, A., Rimoin, A. W., Bavari, S., Whitehouse, C. A. (2005). Reemergence of monkeypox: prevalence, diagnostics, and countermeasures. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41 (12), 1765–1771. doi: 10.1086/498155

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nichols, D. B., De Martini, W., Cottrell, J. (2017). Poxviruses utilize multiple strategies to inhibit apoptosis. Viruses 9 (8), 215. doi: 10.3390/V9080215

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

NIH: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. (2022). Mpox (Formerly Monkeypox) Treatment. Available at: https://www.niaid.nih.gov/diseases-conditions/monkeypox-treatment (Accessed Oct. 31, 2022).

Google Scholar

Oprea, C., Ianache, I., Piscu, S., Tardei, G., Nica, M., Ceausu, E., et al. (2022). First report of monkeypox in a patient living with HIV from Romania. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 49, 102395. doi: 10.1016/J.TMAID.2022.102395

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Osorio, J. E., Yuill, T. M. (2008). Zoonoses In: Mahy, B., van Regenmortel, M., editors. Encyclopedia of Virology 3rd ed. Elsevier Academic Press 485–495.

Google Scholar

Otu, A., Ebenso, B., Walley, J., Barceló, J. M., Ochu, C. L. (2022). Global human monkeypox outbreak: atypical presentation demanding urgent public health action. Lancet Microbe. 3(8), e554–e555. doi: 10.1016/s2666-5247(22)00153-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pawlak, G., Helfman, D. M. (2002). Post-transcriptional down-regulation of ROCKI/Rho-kinase through an MEK-dependent pathway leads to cytoskeleton disruption in ras-transformed fibroblasts. Mol. Biol. Cell 13 (1), 336–347. doi: 10.1091/MBC.01-06-0302

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peiró-Mestres, A., Fuertes, I., Camprubí-Ferrer, D., Marcos, M. Á., Vilella, A., Navarro, M., et al. (2022). Frequent detection of monkeypox virus DNA in saliva, semen, and other clinical samples from 12 patients, Barcelona, Spain, may to June 2022. Euro. Surveill. 27 (28), 2200503. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.28.2200503

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Petersen, E., Kantele, A., Koopmans, M., Asogun, D., Yinka-Ogunleye, A., Ihekweazu, C., et al. (2019). Human monkeypox: Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and prevention. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 33 (4), 1027–1043. doi: 10.1016/J.IDC.2019.03.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pochynyuk, O., Stockand, J. D., Staruschenko, A. (2007). Ion channel regulation by ras, rho, and rab small GTPases. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood). 232 (10), 1258–1265. doi: 10.3181/0703-MR-76

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prazsák, I., Tombácz, D., Szucs, A., Dénes, B., Snyder, M., Boldogkoi, Z. (2018). Full genome sequence of the Western reserve strain of vaccinia virus determined by third-generation sequencing. Genome Announc. 6 (11), e01570-17. doi: 10.1128/GENOMEA.01570-17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Quarleri, J., Victoria Delpino, M., Galvan, V. (2022). Monkeypox: considerations for the understanding and containment of the current outbreak in non-endemic countries. GeroScience 2022, 1–9. doi: 10.1007/S11357-022-00611-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Quenelle, D. C., Buller, R. M., Parker, S., Keith, K. A., Hruby, D. E., Jordan, R., et al. (2007). Efficacy of delayed treatment with ST-246 given orally against systemic orthopoxvirus infections in mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51 (2), 689–695. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00879-06

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Radonić, A., Metzger, S., Dabrowski, P. W., Couacy-Hymann, E., Schuenadel, L., Kurth, A., et al. (2014). “Fatal monkeypox in wild-living sooty mangabey, côte d’Ivoire, 2012,”. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20 (6), 1009–1011. doi: 10.3201/EID2006.131329

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reed, K. D., Melski, J. W., Graham, M. B., Regnery, R. L., Sotir, M. J., Wegner, M. V., et al. (2004). The detection of monkeypox in humans in the Western hemisphere. N. Engl. J. Med. 350 (4), 342–350. doi: 10.1056/NEJMOA032299

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reynolds, M. G., Yorita, K. L., Kuehnert, M. J., Davidson, W. B., Huhn, G. D., Holman, R. C., et al. (2006). Clinical manifestations of human monkeypox influenced by route of infection. J. Infect. Dis. 194 (6), 773–780. doi: 10.1086/505880

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reynolds, M. G., McCollum, A. M., Nguete, B., Lushima, R. S., Petersen, B. W. (2017). Improving the care and treatment of monkeypox patients in low-resource settings: Applying evidence from contemporary biomedical and smallpox biodefense research. Viruses 9 (12), 380. doi: 10.3390/V9120380

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ridley, A. J., Schwartz, M. A., Burridge, K., Firtel, R. A., Ginsberg, M. H., Borisy, G., et al. (2003). Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science 302 (5651), 1704–1709. doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.1092053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rimoin, A. W., Mulembakani, P. M., Johnston, S. C., Lloyd Smith, J. O., Kisalu, N. K., Kinkela, T. L., et al. (2010). Major increase in human monkeypox incidence 30 years after smallpox vaccination campaigns cease in the democratic republic of congo,”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107 (37), 16262–16267. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.1005769107/-/DCSUPPLEMENTAL

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scaife, R. M., Job, D., Langdon, W. Y. (2003). Rapid microtubule-dependent induction of neurite-like extensions in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts by inhibition of ROCK and cbl. Mol. Biol. Cell 14 (11), 4605. doi: 10.1091/MBC.E02-11-0739

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sejvar, J. J., Chowdary, Y., Schomogyi, M., Stevens, J., Patel, J., Karem, K., et al. (2004). Human monkeypox infection: a family cluster in the midwestern united states. J. Infect. Dis. 190 (10), 1833–1840. doi: 10.1086/425039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Semple, S. J., Reynolds, G. D., O’Leary, M. C., Flower, R. L. P. (1998). Screening of Australian medicinal plants for antiviral activity. J. Ethnopharmacol. 60 (2), 163–172. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(97)00152-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Senkevich, T. G., Yutin, N., Wolf, Y. I., Koonin, E. V., Moss, B. (2021). Ancient gene capture and recent gene loss shape the evolution of orthopoxvirus-host interaction genes. MBio 12 (4), e0149521. doi: 10.1128/MBIO.01495-21

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shafaati, M., Zandi, M. (2022). Monkeypox virus neurological manifestations in comparison to other orthopoxviruses. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 49, 102414. doi: 10.1016/J.TMAID.2022.102414

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharma, R., Kumar, P., Rauf, A., Chaudhary, A., Prajapati, P. K., Emran, T. B., et al. (2022). Mucormycosis in the COVID-19 environment: a multifaceted complication. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 964. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.937481

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharma, V., Rai, H., Gautam, D. N. S., Prajapati, P. K., Sharma, R. (2022). “Emerging evidence on omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant,”. J. Med. Virol. 94 (5), 1876–1885. doi: 10.1002/JMV.27626

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shchelkunov, S. N., Totmenin, A. V., Safronov, P. F., Mikheev, M. V., Gutorov, V. V., Ryazankina, O. I. (2002). Analysis of the monkeypox virus genome. Virology 297 (2), 172–194. doi: 10.1006/VIRO.2002.1446

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shchelkunov, S. N., Marennikova, S. S., Moyer, R. W. (2005). Orthopoxviruses pathogenic for humans. Orthopoxviruses. Pathog. Humans., 1–425. doi: 10.1007/B107126/COVER

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Simões, P., Bhagani, S. (2022). A viewpoint: The 2022 monkeypox outbreak. J. Virus Erad. 8 (2), 100078. doi: 10.1016/J.JVE.2022.100078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sklenovská, N., Van Ranst, M. (2018). Emergence of monkeypox as the most important orthopoxvirus infection in humans. Front. Public Heal. 6. doi: 10.3389/FPUBH.2018.00241/PDF

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Soriano, V., Corral, O. (2022). International outbreak of monkeypox in men having sex with men. AIDS Rev. 24 (2), 101–103. doi: 10.24875/AIDSREV.M22000051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stehbens, S., Wittmann, T. (2012). Targeting and transport: how microtubules control focal adhesion dynamics. J. Cell Biol. 198 (4), 481–489. doi: 10.1083/JCB.201206050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sv, P., Ittamalla, R. (2022). What concerns the general public the most about monkeypox virus? - a text analytics study based on natural language processing (NLP). Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 49, 102404. doi: 10.1016/J.TMAID.2022.102404

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thornhill, J. P., Barkati, S., Walmsley, S., Rockstroh, J., Antinori, A., Harrison, L. B., et al. (2022). Monkeypox virus infection in humans across 16 countries - April-June 2022. N. Engl. J. Med. 387(8), 679–691. doi: 10.1056/NEJMOA2207323

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tomori, O., Ogoina, D. (2022). Monkeypox: The consequences of neglecting a disease, anywhere. Science 377 (6612), 1261–1263. doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.ADD3668

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vale, R. D. (1987). Intracellular transport using microtubule-based motors. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 3, 347–378. doi: 10.1146/ANNUREV.CB.03.110187.002023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

UK Health Security Agency. (2022). Recommendations for the use of pre and post exposure vaccination during a monkeypox incident. Available at: https://www.in.gr/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Recommendations-for-use-of-pre-and-post-exposure-vaccination-during-a-monkeypox-incident.pdf.

Google Scholar

Vallée, A., Farfour, E., Zucman, D. (2022). Monkeypox virus: A novel sexually transmitted disease? a case report from France. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 49, 102394. doi: 10.1016/J.TMAID.2022.102394

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van der Vaart, B., Akhmanova, A., Straube, A. (2009). Regulation of microtubule dynamic instability. Biochem. Soc Trans. 37 (Pt 5), 1007–1013. doi: 10.1042/BST0371007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Varghese, R., Patel, P., Kumar, D., Sharma, R. (2023a). Climate change and glacier melting: risks for unusual outbreaks? J. Travel. Med. 31, taad015. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taad015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Varghese, R., Patel, P., Kumar, D., Sharma, R. (2023b). Monkeypox and drug repurposing: Seven potential antivirals to combat the viral disease. Rev. Environ. Health. 30(2), 1–3. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2023-0001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vaughan, A., Aarons, E., Astbury, J., Balasegaram, S., Beadsworth, M., Beck, C. R., et al. (2018). Two cases of monkeypox imported to the united kingdom, September 2018. Euro. Surveill. 23 (38), 2018. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.38.1800509

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vivancos, R., Anderson, C., Blomquist, P., Balasegaram, S., Bell, A., Bishop, L., et al. (2022). Community transmission of monkeypox in the united kingdom, April to may 2022. Euro. Surveill. 27 (22), 2200422. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.22.2200422

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

von Magnus, P., Andersen, E. K., Petersen, K. B., Birch-Andersen, A. (1959). A POX-LIKE DISEASE IN CYNOMOLGUS MONKEYS. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. 46 (2), 156–176. doi: 10.1111/J.1699-0463.1959.TB00328.X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weaver, J. R., Isaacs, S. N. (2008). Monkeypox virus and insights into its immunomodulatory proteins. Immunol. Rev. 225 (1), 96–113. doi: 10.1111/J.1600-065X.2008.00691.X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wells, C. R., Sah, P., Moghadas, S. M., Pandey, A., Shoukat, A., Wang, Y., et al. (2020). Impact of international travel and border control measures on the global spread of the novel 2019 coronavirus outbreak. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117 (13), 7504–7509. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.2002616117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

World Health Organization. (2022). Disease Outbreak News; Multi-country monkeypox outbreak in non-endemic countries. Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2022-DON385 (Accessed Aug. 12, 2022).

Google Scholar

World Health Organisation. (2022). WHO director-general’s statement at the press conference following IHR emergency committee regarding the multi-country outbreak of monkeypox - 23 July 2022. Available at: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-statement-on-the-press-conference-following-IHR-emergency-committee-regarding-the-multi–country-outbreak-of-monkeypox–23-july-2022 (Accessed Aug. 12, 2022).

Google Scholar

World Health Organization. (1996). Weekly epidemiological record. 71 (23)‎, 180–173. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/229796 (Accessed Aug. 12, 2022).

Google Scholar

World Health Organization. (2022). Monkeypox. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/monkeypox (Accessed Aug. 14, 2022).

Google Scholar

Yang, G., Pevear, D. C., Davies, M. H., Collett, M. S., Bailey, T., Rippen, S., et al. (2005). An orally bioavailable antipoxvirus compound (ST-246) inhibits extracellular virus formation and protects mice from lethal orthopoxvirus challenge. J. Virol. 79 (20), 13139–13149. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.20.13139-13149.2005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Z. S., Lin, C. Y., Urbina, A. N., Wang, W. H., Assavalapsakul, W., Tseng, S. P., et al. (2022). The first case of monkeypox virus infection detected in Taiwan: awareness and preparation. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 122, 991–995. doi: 10.1016/J.IJID.2022.07.051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yong, S. E.F., Ng, O. T., Ho, Z. J.M., Mak, T. M., Marimuthu, K., Vasoo, S., et al. (2020). Imported monkeypox, Singapore. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 26 (8), 1826–1830. doi: 10.3201/EID2608.191387

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zambrano, P. G., Acosta-España, J. D., Mosquera Moyano, F., Altamirano Jara, J. B. (2022). Sexually or intimately transmitted infections: A look at the current outbreak of monkeypox in 2022. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 49, 102383. doi: 10.1016/J.TMAID.2022.102383

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zulkipli, I. N., David, S. R., Rajabalaya, R., Idris, A. (2015). Medicinal plants: A potential source of compounds for targeting cell division. Drug Target. Insights 9, 9. doi: 10.4137/DTI.S24946

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: monkeypox, infection, genomics, molecular insights, vaccines, herbs, treatment

Citation: Sharma R, Chen K-T and Sharma R (2023) Emerging evidence on Monkeypox: resurgence, global burden, molecular insights, genomics and possible management. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 13:1134712. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1134712

Received: 30 December 2022; Accepted: 20 February 2023;
Published: 19 April 2023.

Edited by:

Parth Sarthi Sen Gupta, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Berhampur (IISER), India

Reviewed by:

Huahao Fan, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, China
Sohan Sengupta, Patanjali Research Foundation, India

Copyright © 2023 Sharma, Chen and Sharma. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Rohit Sharma, rohitsharma@bhu.ac.in; Kow-Tong Chen, ktchen@mail.ncku.edu.tw

ORCID: Rohit Sharma, orcid.org/0000-0002-3682-3573

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.