Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 03 March 2022
Sec. Bacteria and Host

Recruitment of LC3 by Campylobacter jejuni to Bacterial Invasion Site on Host Cells via the Rac1-Mediated Signaling Pathway

Shiho FukushimaShiho Fukushima1Takaaki Shimohata,*Takaaki Shimohata1,2*Yuri InoueYuri Inoue1Junko KidoJunko Kido1Takashi UebansoTakashi Uebanso1Kazuaki MawatariKazuaki Mawatari1Akira TakahashiAkira Takahashi1
  • 1Department of Preventive Environment and Nutrition Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
  • 2Faculty of Marine Biosciences, Fukui Prefectural University, Fukui, Japan

Campylobacter jejuni is a leading cause of food-borne disease worldwide. The pathogenicity of C. jejuni is closely associated with the internalization process in host epithelial cells, which is related to a host immune response. Autophagy indicates a key role in the innate immune system of the host to exclude invasive pathogens. Most bacteria are captured by autophagosomes and degraded by autophagosome-lysosome fusion in host cells. However, several pathogens, such as Salmonella and Shigella, avoid and/or escape autophagic degradation to establish infection. But autophagy involvement as a host immune response to C. jejuni infection has not been clarified. This study revealed autophagy association in C. jejuni infection. During infection, C. jejuni activated the Rho family small GTPase Rac1 signaling pathway, which modulates actin remodeling and promotes the internalization of this pathogen. In this study, we found the LC3 contribution to C. jejuni invasion signaling via the Rac1 signaling pathway. Interestingly, during C. jejuni invasion, LC3 was recruited to bacterial entry site depending on Rac1 GTPase activation just at the early step of the infection. C. jejuni infection induced LC3-II conversion, and autophagy induction facilitated C. jejuni internalization. Also, autophagy inhibition attenuated C. jejuni invasion step. Moreover, Rac1 recruited LC3 to the cellular membrane, activating the invasion of C. jejuni. Altogether, our findings provide insights into the new function of LC3 in bacterial invasion. We found the interaction between the Rho family small GTPase, Rac1, and autophagy-associated protein, LC3.

Introduction

Campylobacter jejuni is a Gram-negative spiral bacterium, which causes food-borne disease and induces gastroenteritis symptoms. Genomic study revealed that C. jejuni does not conserve any significant toxin or virulent genes, such as type III secretion system (T3SS), widely possessed by Gram-negative pathogens (Parkhill et al., 2000). Alternatively, several studies have revealed the association of various factors in the pathogenicity of C. jejuni, such as motility, chemotaxis, and invasion (Golden and Acheson, 2002; Hendrixson, 2006). Additionally, C. jejuni mutant strain infection, which invade host cells, attenuate the production of proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-8 (IL-8) from intestinal epithelial cells (Hickey et al., 2000). So that, adhesion and invasion steps were considered the key factor of virulence in C. jejuni infection.

During C. jejuni infection, actin filament rearrangement, microtubule dynamics, and endocytosis pathway, were involved in the C. jejuni invasion step (Wooldridge et al., 1996; Biswas et al., 2003; Krause-Gruszczynska et al., 2007; Kido et al., 2017). Alternatively, bacterial fibronectin-binding proteins, CadF and FlpA, are regarded as one of the main bacterial adherence factors that activate integrins and trigger host cytoskeletal rearrangement signaling pathway, and facilitate bacterial internalization (Konkel et al., 1997; Talukdar et al., 2020). Furthermore, integrins α5β1 promote focal adhesion kinase (FAK) phosphorylation, which induces the activation of Rac1 GTPase and actin filament remodeling (Boehm et al., 2011; Eucker and Konkel, 2012). In C. jejuni infection, Rac1 GTPase activation enhanced the invasion of this pathogen (Boehm et al., 2011), so that it is regarded a crucial role in C. jejuni entry step into host epithelial cells.

The bacterial invasion triggers the host immune defense machinery and eliminates intracellular pathogens (Baxt et al., 2013). Particularly, autophagy, especially xenophagy, is characterized as an antibacterial degradation process (Yang and Klionsky, 2009; Deretic, 2011). Autophagy is highly conserved in eukaryotic cells and leads to the lysosomal degradation pathway (Levine et al., 2011). In this pathway, invading pathogens are captured into autophagosomes and degraded by lysosomal fusion. Indeed, in Group A streptococcus (GAS) infection, invading pathogens are eliminated selectively by xenophagy, so that autophagy induction limits GAS infection (Nakagawa et al., 2004). Alternatively, several pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes and Shigella flexneri have escaped systems from xenophagy to infect host cells effectively (Ogawa et al., 2005; Yoshikawa et al., 2009; Dortet et al., 2011). Additionally, it is reported that Francisella tularensis and Brucella abortus rather utilize autophagy signaling for bacterial survival (Checroun et al., 2006; Starr et al., 2012). However, it is still not entirely understood how the C. jejuni interacts with the host autophagy during infection.

It was unclear whether autophagy, which was activated by C. jejuni infection, acts as a host immune system or contributes to the infection process of this pathogen. Therefore, we investigated whether C. jejuni was trapped by autophagy organelles for degradation, and this bacterium did not colocalize with autophagosomes and autolysosomes, unlike Salmonella Enteritidis. This study revealed the significance of C. jejuni-induced autophagy, which did not work as an intracellular clearance system against this pathogen. Moreover, C. jejuni-induced autophagy participated in the invasion of this bacterium, which facilitated the infection. Here, we estimated the contribution of autophagy-related protein, LC3, to the classic C. jejuni invasion pathway, Rac1 signaling. C. jejuni invasion was facilitated by Rac1 activation, and it was canceled by autophagy inhibitor treatment. Additionally, LC3 was recruited to C. jejuni entry site depending on the Rac1 GTP activity. The recruitment of LC3 around C. jejuni was suppressed in the CadF mutant strain. Fibronectin-binding partner of C. jejuni, CadF activate Rac1 via host integrins-FAK signaling pathway to trigger actin rearrangement (Boehm et al., 2011; Talukdar et al., 2020). Those results suggest that the intracellular localization of LC3 was regulated via the FAK-Rac1 signaling pathway in C. jejuni infection (Boehm et al., 2011; Eucker and Konkel, 2012). Additionally, we indicated the molecular interaction between Rac1 and LC3 by immunoprecipitation. Thus, these results lead to a new role of LC3 in bacterial invasion.

Results

C. jejuni Induced Autophagy But Bacterial Cells Were Not Colocalized With Autophagy Organelles

We observed the localization of autophagy organelles and intracellular bacteria to estimate whether C. jejuni are targeted by xenophagy as with Salmonella and Shigella infection (Kageyama et al., 2011; Tattoli et al., 2012). In xenophagy, adapter proteins, such as p62/SQSTM1 and NDP52, crosslinks between autophagy cargo and LC3 via LIR (LC3-interacting region) motif to lysosomal degradation (Birgisdottir et al., 2013; Sudhakar et al., 2019). In this experiment, S. Enteritidis was applied as a positive control of the target in xenophagy. Immunofluorescence staining revealed that most S. Enteritidis was colocalized with LC3 (62.40 ± 4.16% of colocalization, n = 186; Figures 1A, B) and p62 (64.25 ± 2.50% of colocalization, n = 191; Figures 1C, D), and these data suggest that S. Enteritidis was engulfed in autophagosomes (Figures 1AD). Alternatively, C. jejuni were not colocalized with autophagosomal proteins, LC3 (15.93 ± 14.33%, n = 36; 1 h p.i., 7.88 ± 4.30%, n = 55; 6 h p.i., and 6.54 ± 2.38%, n = 94; 12 h p. i., n = 94) and p62 (3.03 ± 5.25%, n = 37; 1 h p.i., 7.35 ± 3.35%, n = 59; 6 h p.i., and 15.13 ± 5.05%; 12 h p. i., n = 117), respectively (Figures 1AD). Also, C. jejuni were not targeted by NDP52 (Figures S1A, B). Autophagosomes mature into autolysosomes by fusing with lysosomes in the late stage of autophagy flux to degrade contents of the vesicles. Thus, we checked the lysosomal localization in C. jejuni-infected cells. But, C. jejuni indicated lower colocalization with lysosomal membrane protein, LAMP2 (16.67 ± 16.67%, n = 35; 1 h p.i., 11.21 ± 10.22%, n = 55; 6 h p.i., 12.42 ± 2.14%, n = 96; 12 h p. i.) compared with S. Enteritidis (61.72 ± 6.99%, n = 115, Figures 1E, F). Similar results were obtained in another C. jejuni strain, 81−176, infected cells (Figures S1CH). Next, we checked autophagy induction in C. jejuni-infected cells by Western blotting. As shown in Figures 1G, H, LC3-II levels, the marker of autophagosome production, was increased during 6–12 h in C. jejuni (NCTC11168) infection in HeLa and Caco-2 cells. Still, autophagy adaptor proteins, p62 and NDP52, were unchanged. Many other autophagy-related (ATG) proteins were also detected, but their protein levels were unchanged, same as p62 and NDP52 during C. jejuni infection (Figures 1G, H and Figure S2A). Also, the other C. jejuni strains 81−176, and 81116 infected cells indicated similar results (Figures S2B, C). To confirm that LC3 increase was associated with autophagy induction, we monitored autophagy flux. Consequently, Bafilomycin A1 treatment increased LC3-II level with the increasing of LC3B mRNA expression in C. jejuni infection (Figures S2DF). Additionally, colocalization of LC3 and LAMP2 was increased (Figures S2G, H). These data indicated that autophagy flux was not inhibited in C. jejuni infection, and implied that C. jejuni upregulated autophagy induction. Altogether, these data revealed that C. jejuni infection triggers autophagy, but this pathogen was not targeted by autophagosomal or autolysosomal compartments.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 The indication of autophagy, and localization of autophagosomes/lysosomes and pathogens in C. jejuni infection. (A, C, E) Representative immunofluorescence images of HeLa cells infected with S. Enteritidis (SE) for 1 h or C. jejuni (Cj) for 6 h. S. Enteritidis and C. jejuni was stained with 10 ng/ml 5(6)-Carboxyfluorescein diacetate (CFDA) solution, and infected to HeLa cells. Cells were immunostained by anti-LC3 (A), p62 (C), and LAMP2 (E) antibody and DAPI, and observed by Keyence BZ-X700 fluorescence microscope. (B) Intracellular bacteria which co-localized with LC3 were quantified. Co-localization rate was determined at 1 h p. i. (Cj-1 h), 6 h p. i. (Cj-6 h), and 12 h p. i. (Cj-1 hr) in (C) jejuni infection, and 1 h p. i. (SE) in S. Enteritidis infection. Cj-1 h: 15.93 ± 14.33% of colocalization; n = 36, Cj-6 h: 7.88 ± 4.30% of colocalization; n = 55, Cj-12 h: 6.54 ± 2.38% of colocalization; n = 94, and SE: 62.40 ± 4.16% of colocalization; n = 186. Sample number indicated the sum of 3 independent experiments. (D) Intracellular bacteria which co-localized with p62 were quantified. Cj-1 h: 3.03 ± 5.25% of colocalization; n = 37, Cj-6 h: 7.35 ± 3.35% of colocalization; n = 59, Cj-12 h: 15.13 ± 5.05%; 12 h p. i. of colocalization; n = 117, and SE: 64.25 ± 2.50% of colocalization; n = 191. Sample number indicated the sum of 3 independent experiments. (F) Intracellular bacteria which co-localized with LAMP2 were quantified. Cj-1 h: 16.67 ± 16.67% of colocalization; n = 35, Cj-6 h: 11.21 ± 10.22% of colocalization; n = 55, Cj-12 h: 15.13 ± 5.05%; 12 h p. i. of colocalization; n = 96, and SE: (61.72 ± 6.99% of colocalization; n = 115. Sample number indicated the sum of 3 independent experiments. (G) HeLa cells were infected with C. jejuni NCTC 11168 up to 12 h and detected autophagy-related proteins, NDP52, p62/SQSTM, LC3 by Western blotting. (H). Caco-2 cells were infected with C. jejuni and detected autophagy-related protein levels.

Autophagy is Involved in C. jejuni Invasion

We explored the atypical role of autophagy induced by C. jejuni. As shown in Figure 1, autophagy was not associated with C. jejuni clearance in host cells. Next, we focused on bacterial invasion with earlier steps of infection. Intracellular bacteria were decreased in autophagy inhibitors, Bafilomycin A1 (Baf) and Chloroquine (CQ), treated cells (Figure 2A). Also, treatment of autophagy inducer, Torin 1 (Tor) and Rapamycin (Rapa), facilitated C. jejuni invasion in HeLa cells (Figure 2B). Similar results were observed in the intestinal epithelial cell line, Caco-2 cell (Figures S3A, B). Autophagy involvement in C. jejuni invasion step was confirmed using the overexpression of autophagosome component (Figure 2C) and knockdown of siRNA or shRNA-mediated autophagy genes (Figures 2D, E). The bacterial invasion was increased in exogenous LC3-II expressing cells (Figure 2C and Figure S4A). Additionally, knockdown of many components, which compose the autophagy pathway, reduced the entry of C. jejuni into host cells (Figures 2D, E). On the other hand, invasion step of S. Enteritidis was not changed in autophagy inducers or knockdown of siRNA-mediated autophagy genes (Figures S3D, E). Interference efficiency of siRNA and shRNA was confirmed by Western blotting (Figures S4BM). Interestingly, siRNA-mediated ULK1 knockdown, which participates in autophagosome nucleation, did not affect invasion (Figure 2D). ULK1 plays a central role in autophagy induction by forming a complex with ATG101, FIP200, and ATG13 (Mercer et al., 2009; Karanasios et al., 2016). Thus, we confirmed the participation of other factors of ULK1 complex, FIP200, and ATG13 in C. jejuni invasion with shRNA. Opposite to ULK1, FIP200 and ATG13 were involved in the bacterial invasion step (Figure 2E).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 The contribution of autophagy signaling in C. jejuni invasion step. (A) HeLa cells were treated with 200 nM Bafilomicin-A1 (Baf) or 50 μM Chloroquine (CQ) for 3 h. The number of intracellular C. jejuni was measured by gentamicin protection assay at 1 h p. i., and decided by counting of Colony Forming Unit (CFU). (B) The number of intracellular C. jejuni in HeLa cells, which treated by 1 μM Torin 1 (Torin) or 200 nM Rapamycin (Rapa) for 3 h, were measured by gentamicin protection assay at 1 h p. i. (C) HeLa cells which stably express pEGFP or pEGFP-LC3B vector were infected with C. jejuni for 1 h, and the number of invaded bacteria was estimated by gentamicin protection assay. (D) siRNA against autophagy-related genes were transfected to HeLa cells, and intracellular bacterial number at 1 h p. i. was measured by gentamicin protection assay. (E) The expression of ULK1 complex components, ULK1, FIP200, and ATG13, were attenuated by shRNA-mediated knockdown in HeLa cells, and the invaded bacterial number was measured by gentamicin protection assay at 1 h p. i. All data are expressed as means ± standard deviations from 3 independent experiments. Differences were evaluated with Two-tailed Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001.

Altogether, these data suggest that most autophagy components were associated with C. jejuni invasion, and autophagy could be used in the bacterial invasion during infection to host epithelial cells; new autophagy function.

Association Between Autophagy- and Rac1-Mediated C. jejuni Invasion Pathways

Next, we undertook to clarify the mechanism of how autophagy signaling promotes C. jejuni invasion. Since the association between autophagy and bacterial invasion signaling is not clearly understood. Recent studies characterized that C. jejuni invasion is associated with cytoskeletal dynamics, such as microtubules (Hu and Kopecko, 1999; Kido et al., 2017) or actin filaments (Biswas et al., 2003; Krause-Gruszczynska et al., 2007), and intracellular transportation pathway, endocytosis (Wooldridge et al., 1996). We focused on autophagy association in conventional invasion signaling in C. jejuni. To assess the effect of autophagy signaling to classical invasion signaling in C. jejuni invasion, the cells were treated with each signaling inhibitor: colchicine, cytochalasin D, or MβCD, in addition to with/without the autophagy inducer, Torin 1. Consequently, each inhibitor attenuated bacterial invasion, and Torin 1 treatment promoted the bacterial invasion even microtubule dynamics and endocytosis inhibitors-treated cells. Alternatively, Torin 1-mediated increase in C. jejuni invasion was abolished in obstruction of actin assembly by cytochalasin D treatment (Figures 3A, B). These data indicated that autophagy-mediated C. jejuni invasion was associated with actin assembly signaling. Since the actin assembly was modulated by several types of small GTPases, we next surveyed the contribution of small GTPases that drive actin dynamics. Here we applied constitutively active form or dominant-negative form of Flag-tagged RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 expressed in cells (Figure S5A). C. jejuni invasion was dramatically increased in active Rac1-expressed cells (Figures 3CE and Figure S5B: 81−176 strain). Also, C. jejuni infection increased endogenous Rac1 activity, the same as in previous reports (Krause-Gruszczynska et al., 2007; Eucker and Konkel, 2012). Additionally, the increase in C. jejuni invasion by Constitutive active (CA)-Rac1 was canceled by the autophagy inhibitor, Bafilomycin A1 treatment (Figure 3F). It was also confirmed by using LC3B knockdown by siRNA (Figure 3G). These results indicate that the actin polymerization factor, Rac1, was involved in the autophagy-mediated C. jejuni invasion step. Additionally, actin polymerization or Rac1 signaling was nonessential for C. jejuni adhesion step (Figure S5F). Alternatively, Rac1-associated uptake was not found in Salmonella (S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium) invasion and uptake of FITC-dextran (Figures S5C–(E). Therefore, of Rac1 contribution was specific to C. jejuni invasion.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Association between Autophagy- and Rac1-mediated C. jejuni invasion pathway. (A) HeLa cells were treated with 10 μM Cholchicine (CLC), 300 nM Cytochalasin D (CyD) with or without 1 μM Torin 1 for 3 h. The number of invaded C. jejuni was estimated by gentamicin protection assay at 1 h p. i. (B) HeLa cells were treated with 1 μM Torin 1 for 3 h, and 3 mM Methyl-beta-cyclodextrin (MβCD) was additionally treated for last 1 h. Intracellular bacterial number was measured by gentamicin protection assay at 1 h p. i. (C) Empty vector (EV) and, constitutive active form (CA) and dominant negative form (DN) of RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 were transfected in HeLa cells. The number of intracellular C. jejuni was estimated by gentamicin protection assay at 1 h p. i. (D) Intracellular active Rac1 level at 6 h p. i. was measured by Western blotting. (E) Band intensity of active Rac1 was quantified. (F) CA-Rac1 or DN-Rac1 expressed HeLa cells were treated with 200 nM Bafilomycin A1 (Baf) for 3 h. The number of intracellular C. jejuni was estimated by gentamicin protection assay at 1 h p. i. (G) HeLa cells were co-transfected EV, CA-Rac1, or DN-Rac1 and siNC or siLC3B. The number of intracellular C. jejuni was estimated by gentamicin protection assay at 1 h p. i. All data are expressed as means ± standard deviations from 3 independent experiments. Differences were evaluated with Two-tailed Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001.

Interaction Between Autophagy and Rac1 Signaling in C. jejuni Infection

We investigated the interaction between autophagy and Rac1 in C. jejuni infection to promote bacterial entry. First, the molecular interaction between autophagy-associated protein and Rac1 was confirmed, immune precipitation experiment revealed LC3 binding to Flag-Rac1 (Figures 4A, B). This interaction was clearly enhanced in CA-Rac1, and it is indicated that Rac1 regulates binding to LC3 depending on the GTPase activity. Additionally, LC3 was colocalized with CA-Rac1 and recruited this protein to the edge of the cell (Figures 4C, D; EV: 51.97 ± 2.33%, n = 48, CA-Rac1: 78.58 ± 7.38%, n = 73, DN-Rac1: 28.08 ± 9.52%, n = 59, CA-RhoA: 35.96 ± 10.12%, n = 65, CA-Cdc42: 30.20 ± 6.92%, n = 83, CA-Rac1 + Baf: 36.89 ± 6.28%, n = 55, CA-Rac1 + CyD: 31.17 ± 4.87%, n = 51). Moreover, C. jejuni was colocalized with LC3 at the bacterial entry site only in the early stage of infection, contrary to observations during its intracellular survival (Figures 1A, B and 4C). The percentage of C. jejuni colocalized with LC3 was increased in CA-Rac1 and decreased in DN-Rac1 expressed cells. Other small GTPases-expressed cells or autophagy and actin polymerization inhibitor-treated CA-Rac1 expressed cells decreased colocalization with LC3 (Figure 4D). This change in the recruitment of LC3 to C. jejuni invasion sites was consistent with promoted or attenuated bacterial invasion (Figures 3C and 4B, C). Unlike LC3, autophagy adaptor protein, p62, was not colocalized with bacteria. Those results showed the characteristic recruitment of LC3 in C. jejuni infection, and that mechanism was different from xenophagy (Figure S6A). Our results indicated that LC3 recruitment to the C. jejuni invasion site was driven by a direct interaction between LC3 and Rac1, and LC3 was used in C. jejuni invasion via Rac1 signaling pathway.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Interaction of autophagy signaling and Rac1 signaling in C. jejuni infection. (A) HeLa cells were transfected with EV, CA-Rac1, and DN-Rac1. Cells were lysed and subjected to immunoprecipitation with Sepharose beads, and analyzed by Western blotting by using anti-Flag antibody. (B) HeLa cells were transfected with vectors as shown, and subjected to immunoprecipitation. Cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting by using anti-LC3B antibody. (C) Representative immunofluorescence images of CA-Rac1 expressed HeLa cells infected with C. jejuni which stained with 10 ng/ml 5(6)-Carboxyfluorescein diacetate (CFDA) solution. Cells were immunostained by anti-LC3 antibody and DAPI, and observed by confocal microscope. (D) The rate of colocalization of C. jejuni and LC3 was quantified in EV, CA-Rac1, DN-Rac1, CA-RhoA, and CA-Cdc42 expressed HeLa cells. CA-Rac1 transfected cells were treated with 200 nM Bafilomycin A1 (Baf) for 3 h or 300 nM Cytochalasin D (CyD) for 1 h before infection. The differences of signnificance were tested in comparison with CA-Rac1. EV: n = 48, CA-Rac1: n = 73, DN-Rac1: n = 59, CA-RhoA: n = 65, CA-Cdc42: n = 83, CA-Rac1 + Baf: n = 55, CA-Rac1 + CyD: n = 51 of bacterial cells. The data of confocal microscope were pooled from 4 independent experiments. Differences were evaluated with Two-tailed Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001.

Activation Pathway of Rac1 Signaling That Recruits LC3 to C. jejuni Entry Site

Finally, we explored what signaling pathway activates Rac1 and recruits LC3 to internalize bacteria. A previous study revealed that C. jejuni fibronectin-binding partner, CadF, activated Rac1 via host integrins-FAK signaling to trigger actin rearrangement (Boehm et al., 2011; Talukdar et al., 2020). We investigated the correlation between the Rac1 signaling pathway above, and the other is the Rac1 activation pathway to alter the intracellular localization of LC3 and classical C. jejuni invasion-related Rac1 signaling. Two invasion deficient strains, CadF::cmr and CapA::cmr were applied in this study (Figure 5A). Although, the reduction of intracellular entry, LC3-II level was increased in each C. jejuni strain (Figure 5B). Additionally, bacterial removed supernatant, including bacterial secretion, indicated the autophagy induction ability (Figure 5C). These data suggest that autophagy was induced by C. jejuni secretion, independently of invasion. Unlike intracellular LC3-II level, only CadF mutant did not activate host Rac1 signaling (Figure 5D). Interestingly, recruitment of LC3 to bacterial entry site was decreased in CadF mutant, and it was implied that C. jejuni recruit LC3 to bacterial invasion site by binding host fibronectin to activate classical C. jejuni invasion signaling, the Rac1 signaling pathway (Figure 5E). Additionally, supernatant induced autophagy but it did not activate Rac1 (Figure 5F). Our data suggest that the Rac1 signaling pathway was triggered by CadF-mediated integrin-FAK signaling, and it regulates the localization of LC3 to the bacterial entry site (Figure 5G).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 Contribution of virulence factor in LC3-mediated C. jejuni invasion. (A) HeLa cells were infected with C. jejuni of WT, capA::cmr, and cadF::cmr. The number of intracellular C. jejuni was estimated by gentamicin protection assay at 1 h p. i. Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations (n = 4). (B) HeLa cells were infected with C. jejuni for 6 h, and detected autophagy-related proteins, p62/SQSTM and LC3 by Western blotting. (C) C. jejuni strains of WT, capA::cmr, and cadF::cmr or heat-killed bacteria were incubated in High glucose supplemented DMEM [DMEM(+)] for 24 h, and then bacterial cells were removed and the supernatant was collected. HeLa cells were cultured in bacterial removed supernatant for 6 h, and detected p62/SQSTM and LC3 by Western blotting. (D) Intracellular active Rac1 level at 6 h p. i. was measured by Western blotting. (E) Localization of LC3 and C. jejuni was observed by confocal microscope at 20 min p.i., and the rate of LC3-positive bacteria was quantified in C. jejuni of WT, capA::cmr, and cadF::cmr infected cells. WT: n = 64, capA::cmr: n = 83, cadFcmr: n = 84 of bacterial cells which pooled from 3 independent experiments. (F) C. jejuni and heat-killed bacteria was incubated in DMEM(+) for 24 h, and the supernatant was collected. HeLa cells were cultured in aforementioned supernatant for 6 h, and intracellular active Rac1 level was measured by Western blotting. (G) Proposed model in this study for C. jejuni infection signaling which mediated by Rac1 activated by CadF, and invasion route via LC3. All data are expressed as means ± standard deviations from 3 independent experiments. Differences were evaluated with Two-tailed Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05.

Discussion

In this study, we clarified the new function of autophagy in Campylobacter jejuni infection. In bacterial infection, autophagy is characterized as an intracellular catabolic system to maintain homeostasis, and it degrades invading pathogens as the host immune defense system. However, C. jejuni is not colocalized with LC3, p62, and NDP52 (Figures 1AH), which means that C. jejuni was not targeted by the xenophagy within the cell. Alternatively, autophagosome protein, LC3-II, significantly increased in infected cells. The accumulation of autophagy protein comes from the upregulation of the pathway or inhibition of autophagy flux (Mizushima and Yoshimori, 2007). In this study, the LC3-II level was more increased by autophagy inhibitor treatment, Bafilomycin A1, in C. jejuni infection (Figures 1L, M). Additionally, mRNA expression of LC3B was upregulated by C. jejuni infection (Figure 1N). These results suggest that C. jejuni activated autophagy signaling rather than inhibiting it. Additionally, autophagy inhibition did not recover the survival ratio of intracellular C. jejuni (Data not shown). These results indicate that autophagy induced by C. jejuni infection does not work to eliminate this pathogen.

As another function of autophagy that does not remove intracellular pathogens, autophagy utilization in the invasion step of C. jejuni was newly discovered in this study. Recently, it has been reported that autophagy proteins are involved in the cellular uptake pathway via an atypical autophagy signaling pathway. LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP) is one of the noncanonical autophagy pathways in which LC3 is recruited to mature phagosomes and enhances the immune response (Martinez et al., 2011). Furthermore, LC3-associated with endocytosis (LANDO) is involved in the uptake and degradation of amyloid β in nerve cells (Heckmann et al., 2020). Those pathways newly revealed intracellular uptake pathway via noncanonical autophagic vesicle, which recruits LC3. However, autophagy-mediated C. jejuni invasion pathway was considered as different in the following points: (i) Differences in participation of autophagic components involved in the signaling pathway; Rubicon is a negative regulator of canonical autophagy whereas involved in noncanonical autophagy (Martinez et al., 2015). However, RNAi of Rubicon did not attenuate C. jejuni internalization; rather it increased (Figure S2A). Furthermore, the components of the ULK1 complex, ATG13 and FIP200, were involved in C. jejuni invasion, different from LAP and LANDO (Figure 2E). Briefly, autophagy signaling-mediated C. jejuni invasion differs from reported noncanonical autophagy in terms of Rubicon and ULK1 complex involvement. (ii) Difference in the time point of LC3 recruitment to vesicles; LC3 was localized to the maturated vesicles after the internalization of pathogens in the noncanonical autophagy pathway (Martinez et al., 2011; Heckmann et al., 2020), but in C. jejuni infection, LC3 was recruited to the bacterial invasion site, which is the initial stage of Campylobacter-containing vacuole (CCV) formation (Figures 4C, D). Afterward, the maturated CCV in the cytoplasm was changed to LC3 negative (Figures 1AF), LC3 contributed to bacterial invasion, but was unrelated to CCV maturation. Namely, in C. jejuni infection, LC3 did not participate in CCV maturation, unlike other noncanonical autophagy. (iii) Association of Rac1 with noncanonical autophagy signaling pathway; no study indicated the contribution of Rac1 signaling for LC3 recruitment in noncanonical autophagy. Our data indicated that Rac1 was involved in the recruitment of LC3 to internalizing pathway of C. jejuni. Our observations indicated that autophagy signaling activated in C. jejuni infection deviated away from canonical autophagy. It is also different from known atypical autophagy pathway, such as LAP and LANDO. Thus, we provide new insights that autophagy induced by C. jejuni is involved in pathogen infection.

To identify the mechanism of autophagy-associated C. jejuni invasion, we used several types of inhibitors or small GTPase mutants. In this study, we identified Rac1, a small GTPase involved in actin polymerization, as a contributing factor for the invasion of C. jejuni via autophagy signaling (Figure 3). Additionally, we found that the interaction between LC3 and Rac1 enhanced its interaction by Rac1 activation. Furthermore, LC3 recruitment to the cell surface was controlled by Rac1 activation, which positively regulated C. jejuni invasion.

To clarify the bacterial factors, which regulate autophagy-mediated invasion, we used CapA and CadF mutant strains. CapA, an auto transporter protein of C. jejuni, is one of the factors that contribute to internalization in host cells (Ashgar et al., 2007). Alternatively, the outer membrane fibronectin-binding protein, CadF, mediates adhesion to cell-associated fibronectin and activates Rac1, which is mediated by Paxillin phosphorylation (Eucker and Konkel, 2012). This signaling pathway contributes to C. jejuni internalization by acactivating actin polymerization. Consistent with the role of CapA and CadF in the infection, mutant strains of these genes attenuated bacterial invasion. Additionally, the CadF mutant strain reduced Rac1 activation and colocalization with LC3 and decreased intracellular bacteria. In contrast, CapA::cmr reduced invasion, but Rac1 activity and LC3 colocalization were the same as WT (Figures 5A, D, E). Those results indicate that C. jejuni internalization pathway mediated by Rac1-LC3 signaling axis was activated by C. jejuni outer membrane protein, CadF. Interestingly, Rac1 activation level was different between wildtype and these two mutants, but LC3 protein level was the same in each strain-infected cell (Figure 5B). This result indicated that the activation of autophagy signaling was upregulated by C. jejuni infection independent of CadF-Rac1 signaling. It suggested that C. jejuni facilitated invasion via the dual pathway of autophagy induction and LC3 localization. The addition of bacterial-cultured supernatants, which removed bacterial cells, also increased LC3 and the infection of living C. jejuni, this data suggested that this pathogen-induced autophagy occurs in the earliest step of the infection before Rac1 signaling activation (Figure 5C). In other words, C. jejuni enhanced the LC3-II protein level from outside the cell, and could change the host condition to be specialized for establishing the infection. Then, adhered pathogen recruited increased LC3 to bacterial entry site by activating Rac1, and efficiently invaded the host cells. These led to the conclusion that an autophagy-mediated invasion is one of the infection pathways for C. jejuni. Additionally, we also found the new function of Rac1 in the noncanonical autophagy pathway that concerns relocalization of LC3 distribution in C. jejuni infection.

In this study, it is insufficiently understood how Rac1 interacts with the autophagy signaling pathway. Autophagy has roles in starvation adaptation, intracellular protein clearance, and cell death via the mTORC1 signaling pathway (Mizushima, 2007). Autophagy induction is closely associated with mTORC1 signaling, and under autophagy induced conditions, downstream factors of mTORC1 are dephosphorylated (Jung et al., 2010). Previously, some researchers have found mTORC1 regulation and autophagy signaling by Rac1, but there are inconsistent insights into how Rac1 positively and negatively controls autophagy (Xie et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2020). These different results could be due to the role of Rac1 in intracellular processes, and autophagy regulation is changed depending on various cellular conditions and neoplasticity. In our results, CA and DN overexpression in several types of small GTPase, including Rac1, modulated p70S6K to be phosphorylated, which inhibits autophagy induction. However, in C. jejuni-infected cells, small GTPase-expressed cells decreased phosphorylated p70S6K and increased LC3-II production in C. jejuni infection (Figure S6E). It was suggested that the control of autophagy signaling by C. jejuni infection is more influential than that by Rac1 signaling. Here, we inadequately revealed the interaction between mTORC1-mediated autophagy induction and CadF-Rac1 mediated recruitment of LC3 to bacterial entry site. To clarify the interaction between the two signaling pathway, further examinations are required in the next study.

Usually, autophagy eliminates intracellular bacteria, but several pathogens use it to maintain bacterial survival in intracellular niches. Previously, several studies have revealed that intracellular pathogens, F. tularensis and B. abortus, partially recruit autophagy-related proteins to intracellular bacteria-containing vesicles (BCV) (Checroun et al., 2006; Starr et al., 2012; Steele et al., 2013). The maturation of BCV via a noncanonical autophagy signaling pathway contributes to bacterial intracellular survival. Additionally, it was suggested that the degradation of cellular contents by autophagy supply the nutrients required for intracellular survival of F. tularensis (Steele et al., 2013). Those studies indicated insights that lead to the control of pathogen infection by elucidating noncanonical autophagy signaling pathway in bacterial infection. Similarly, here we indicated new insights of noncanonical autophagy-mediated C. jejuni invasion pathway. Altogether, it is suggested that autophagy may have a potential for preventing and inhibiting major foodborne-causing pathogens, C. jejuni infection. To clarify the therapeutic potential, a detailed pathway of intracellular invasion mediated by LC3 is necessary for future studies.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

C. jejuni strains NCTC11168 (ATCC 700819), 81-176 (ATCC BAA2151), and 81116 (NCTC11828) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The bacteria were grown in Muller–Hinton (MH) broth (Difco, #225250) at 37°C under micro aerobic conditions (5% O2, 10% CO2, 85% N2) for 48 h. It was concentrated by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 3 min, and bacterial pellet was diluted into fresh MH broth and was re-cultured under micro aerobic condition for 36 h. Then, bacterial cells were collected by centrifuging the medium at 3,000 rpm for 15 min, the supernatant was removed, and the pellet was washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 137-mM NaCl, 8.1-mM anhydrous Na2HPO4, 2.68-mM KCl, 1.47-mM KH2PO4). Then, suspension was centrifuged again, and the pellet was resuspended in PBS to be adjusted to an optical density of 600 nm (OD600) of 1.0 for the infection experiment.

S. enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) 171 strain (Nakano et al., 2012) was cultured in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium at 37°C with shaking. For the experiment, bacterial cells were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 3 min, pellet were washed with PBS, centrifuged again, and resuspended in PBS to adjust to OD600 of 1.0.

Cell Culture

HeLa cell (RCB #0007) was provided by the RIKEN BRC through the National BioResource Project of the MEXT/AMED, Japan, and cultured for three days in Dulbecco’s-modified Eagle’s medium, high glucose (DMEM; Sigma-Aldrich, #D6429) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Ausgene) and 50-µg/ml gentamicin (Wako, #078-06061) [DMEM (+)] at 37°C in 5% CO2. Additionally, the human intestinal epithelial cell line, Caco-2 cells, was cultured in DMEM (+) for four days.

For the infection experiments, the medium was changed to DMEM without FBS and gentamicin [DMEM (−)]. The cells were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 100−200:1 in C. jejuni infection or 10−20:1 in S. Enteritidis infection, and infected cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2.

Western Blotting

Cell lysates were prepared with Radio-Immunoprecipitation Assay buffer (RIPA buffer; pH 7.4, 50-mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1-mM EDTA, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100) mixed with 1-mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) as a protease inhibitor. The cell lysates were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was collected in new tubes. Protein concentration was assayed using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Wako, #297-73101). The protein was separated by 8–14% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred onto PVDF (Immunobilon-P; Millipore), and the membranes were blocked with 3% skim milk in TBS-T [pH 7.6, 20-mM Tris, 150-mM NaCl, 0.02% polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate] for 1 h at room temperature. After incubation, the membrane was treated with primary antibodies for LC3 (MBL, #PM036), p62 (MBL, #M162-3), NDP52 (GeneTex, #GTX115378), and ß-actin (SantaCruz, #sc-47778) at 1:1,000 dilution, and incubated at 4°C overnight. Afterward, the membrane was washed with TBST and treated with mouse monoclonal (MBL, #330) or rabbit polyclonal (MBL, #458) secondary antibodies (1:2,000) at room temperature for 90 min. The membranes were washed with TBS-T for 30 min and detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL; Cytiva, #RPN2209) using medical X-ray film or a luminescent image analyzer (Fujifilm, LAS-2000).

Immunofluorescence Staining

Before infection, the bacterial cells were incubated with 20-µM CFDA SE cell trace kit reagent (CFDA; Invitrogen, #V12883) dissolved in PBS for 1 h. Then, the bacterial suspension was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 15 min. Afterward; the pellets were washed with PBS, centrifuged again, and resolved in PBS to the infection experiment. HeLa cells were seeded on glass coverslips and infected with bacteria previously stained by CFDA.

The cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde-PBS for 10 min at room temperature, permeabilized by 0.1% Triton X-100 solved in PBS for 7 min, and washed thrice with PBS. Next, samples were blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 1 h, washed with PBS, and incubated with primary antibodies for LC3, p62, and LAMP2 (Abcam, #ab25631) at 1:500 dilution at 4°C overnight. Next, the samples were washed thrice with PBS and treated with secondary antibodies [Alexa Fluor® 568-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen, #A11004) or Alexa Fluor® 568-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen, #A11011), 1:1,000] at 4°C for 1 h. Then, the samples were washed, and the cell nucleus was stained by 4’,6-Diamidino-2-Phenylindole, Dihydrochloride (DAPI; 500 nM, Invitrogen, #D1306) at 4°C for 5 min. Images were captured using a Keyence BZ-X700 microscope and Nikon A1R confocal laser scanning microscope.

Plasmid

CA forms or dominant-negative (DN) forms of RhoA, Rac1, Cdc42 were subcloned into pME18sf-Pyori in a previous study (Akeda et al., 2002). All CA forms (RhoAV14, Rac1V12, and Cdc42V12) and DN forms (RhoAN19, Rac1N17, and Cdc42N17) contain N-terminal Flag tag.

LC3B overexpression plasmid (pEGFP-LC3B) was constructed from pEGFFP-C1, and the insert was created using the following primers; 5’-GAATTCGCCGTCGGAGAAGACCTTCAAGCAG-3’ for forward and 5’-GGATCCTTACACTGACAATTTCAATCCCGAACGTC-3’ for reverse.

Extraction of C. jejuni Secretion Into the Culture Medium

C. jejuni were incubated in DMEM (−) overnight and the bacterial cells were removed using a syringe filter (Corning, #431215). After that, the flow through was ultra filtered using an Amicon Ultra 3K device (Merck Millipore, #UFC800324) at 3,000×g for 60 min. The culture medium on HeLa cells were replaced with the ultrafiltered flow through and evaluated autophagy induction.

Invasion Assay

To conduct invasion assay, HeLa cells were seeded at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well in 24-well plates and incubated at 37°C for three days.

In C. jejuni invasion assay, cells were treated with autophagy inhibitors, 200 nM Bafilomicin A1 or 50 µM Chloroquine, for 1 h before infection. The culture medium was replaced with flesh DMEM(−), and the cells were infected with C. jejuni for 1 h. Autophagy inducers, 1 μM Torin 1 or 200 nM Rapamycin, were incubated with cells for 1 h and the cells were infected with C. jejuni for 1 h. After infection, extracellular bacteria were removed and replaced the culture medium to 100 µg/ml gentamicin containing DMEM for 2 h. Then, the cells were washed with PBS and lysed with 1% Toriton-X in PBS for 5 min at 37°C. The diluted cell lysates were plated on MH agar plates and incubated for 48 h under micro aerobic conditions. Intracellular bacterial cell numbers were determined by counting colony-forming units (CFU), and the bacterial number was normalized with the protein concentration of the individual samples. Protein concentration was measured using BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher).

Transfection With siRNA and shRNA

HeLa cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 105 cells/well in 24-well plates and incubated for 24 h in DMEM(+). After that, the cell culture medium was removed and replaced with Opti-MEM (Thermo Fisher, #31985070). For siRNA-mediated knockdown, HeLa cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher, # 11668019) and predesigned siRNA for ULK1 (Thermo Fisher, #110808), BECN1 (Thermo Fisher, #137198), UVRAG (Thermo Fisher, #13012), ATG16L1 (Thermo Fisher, 133572), ATG4B (Thermo Fisher, #121660), ATG5 (Thermo Fisher, #6528), ATG7 (Thermo Fisher, #17725), LC3B (Thermo Fisher, #130442) or negative control siRNA (Thermo Fisher, #AM4611) for 3 h. DMEM, high glucose with 20% FBS and 50-µg/ml gentamicin, was added and incubated overnight. The supernatants were replaced with DMEM(+), and the cells were incubated for 48 h. Transfected cells were used for the experiments. RNAi by shRNA was conducted in the same procedure as above. To express shRNA for use in RNAi analysis, targeting oligo for shRNA-mediated knockdown was ligated into pENTR/U6 (Invitrogen, # K494500). The sequences of the oligonucleotides were as follows: ULK1 (Top: 5’-caccgccgcatggacttcgatgagttcgaaaactcatcgaagtccatgcgg-3’, Bottom: 5’-aaaaccgcatggacttcgatgagttttcgaactcatcgaagtccatgcggc-3’, NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_003565.2), FIP200 (Top: 5’-caccgatgcctagaacaactaacgaacgaattcgttagttgttctaggcat-3’, Bottom: 5’-aaaaatgcctagaacaactaacgaattcgttcgttagttgttctaggcatc-3’, NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_001083617.1), and ATG13 (Top: 5’-caccgttggttcaacttagcaatcaacgaattgattgctaagttgaaccaa-3’, Bottom: 5’-aaaattggttcaacttagcaatcaattcgttgattgctaagttgaaccaac-3’, NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_001142673.2).

Rac1 Activity Assay

The GTPase activity of Rac1 was detected using the Active Rac1 Detection Kit (CST, #8815). Briefly, cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and lysed with 1× lysis/binding/wash buffer that was freshly added with 1-mM PMSF. After centrifugation at 16,000×g at 4°C for 15 min, the protein concentration was assayed using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Wako). Then GST-PAK1-PBD fusion resin beads were added to the supernatant and incubated at 4°C for 1 h. Finally, the resin-bound active Rac1 was eluted with 2× SDS sample buffer containing 200-mM dithiothreitol for Western blotting using Rac1 mAb (CST, #8631, 1:1,000).

Immunoprecipitation

Cell pellets were washed with Wash buffer [100-mM NaCl, 10-mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4), 1-mM DTT] and prepared with lysis buffer [100-mM NaCl, 100-mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4), 0.02% NP-40, 1-mM PMSF]. The lysate was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm at 4°C for 10 min, and the protein concentration of the supernatant was adjusted to 1.0 mg/ml using BCA Protein Assay Kit (Wako). The samples were incubated with antibodies of LC3B (CST, #83506S), Flag (Sigma, #F3165), or normal mouse IgG (SantaCruz, #sc-2025) at 4°C overnight. Then, protein A-Sepharose beads (Cytiva, #17078001) were added and incubated for 90 min at 4°C. The beads were washed with wash buffer, and bound protein were eluted by boiling in SDS sample buffer [100-mM Tris–HCl (pH 6.8), 4% SDS, 10% ß-mercaptmomethanol, 20% glycerol]. After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected and taken out for Western blotting.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis of all data was conducted using Student’s t-test for paired data. Data from 3 independent experiments were evaluated. All tests were one-tailed.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

TS, AT, and SF contributed to conception and design of the study. SF, TS, YI, and JK conducted the experiments. SF and TS wrote the first draft of the manuscript. AT, TU, and KM contributed materials and helped to analyze the data. All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Numbers JP20H01616, JP15K00819, and JP20K11647).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Support Center for Advanced Medical Sciences, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School. We wish to express our thanks to Yukihiro Akeda (Osaka University) for the kind gifts of pME18sf-Pyori plasmids, and Toshifumi Tomoyasu (Tokushima University) for kindly providing Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) χ3306 strain.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2022.829682/full#supplementary-material

References

Akeda, Y., Kodamat, K., Kashimoto, T., Cantarelli, V., Horiguchi, Y., Nagayama, K., et al. (2002). Dominant-Negative Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 Facilitate the Invasion Process of Vibrio Parahaemolyticus Into Caco-2 Cells. Infect. Immun. 70 (2), 970–973. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.2.970-973.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ashgar, S. S., Oldfield, N. J., Wooldridge, K. G., Jones, M. A., Irving, G. J., Turner, D. P., et al. (2007). CapA, an Autotransporter Protein of Campylobacter Jejuni, Mediates Association With Human Epithelial Cells and Colonization of the Chicken Gut. J. Bacteriol. 189 (5), 1856–1865. doi: 10.1128/JB.01427-06

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baxt, L. A., Garza-Mayers, A. C., Goldberg, M. B. (2013). Bacterial Subversion of Host Innate Immune Pathways. Science 340 (6133), 697–701. doi: 10.1126/science.1235771

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Birgisdottir, Å., Lamark, T., Johansen, T. (2013). The LIR Motif - Crucial for Selective Autophagy. J. Cell Sci. 126 (Pt 15), 3237–3247. doi: 10.1242/jcs.126128

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Biswas, D., Itoh, K., Sasakawa, C. (2003). Role of Microfilaments and Microtubules in the Invasion of INT-407 Cells by Campylobacter Jejuni. Microbiol. Immunol. 47 (6), 469–473. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2003.tb03372.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boehm, M., Krause-Gruszczynska, M., Rohde, M., Tegtmeyer, N., Takahashi, S., Oyarzabal, O. A., et al. (2011). Major Host Factors Involved in Epithelial Cell Invasion of Campylobacter Jejuni: Role of Fibronectin, Integrin Beta1, FAK, Tiam-1, and DOCK180 in Activating Rho Gtpase Rac1. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 1, 17. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2011.00017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Checroun, C., Wehrly, T. D., Fischer, E. R., Hayes, S. F., Celli, J. (2006). Autophagy-Mediated Reentry of Francisella Tularensis Into the Endocytic Compartment After Cytoplasmic Replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 (39), 14578–14583. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601838103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deretic, V. (2011). Autophagy in Immunity and Cell-Autonomous Defense Against Intracellular Microbes. Immunol. Rev. 240 (1), 92–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00995.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dortet, L., Mostowy, S., Samba-Louaka, A., Louaka, A. S., Gouin, E., Nahori, M. A., et al. (2011). Recruitment of the Major Vault Protein by Inlk: A Listeria Monocytogenes Strategy to Avoid Autophagy. PloS Pathog. 7 (8), e1002168. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002168

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eucker, T. P., Konkel, M. E. (2012). The Cooperative Action of Bacterial Fibronectin-Binding Proteins and Secreted Proteins Promote Maximal Campylobacter Jejuni Invasion of Host Cells by Stimulating Membrane Ruffling. Cell Microbiol. 14 (2), 226–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01714.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Golden, N. J., Acheson, D. W. (2002). Identification of Motility and Autoagglutination Campylobacter Jejuni Mutants by Random Transposon Mutagenesis. Infect. Immun. 70 (4), 1761–1771. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.4.1761-1771.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heckmann, B. L., Teubner, B. J. W., Tummers, B., Boada-Romero, E., Harris, L., Yang, M., et al. (2020). LC3-Associated Endocytosis Facilitates β-Amyloid Clearance and Mitigates Neurodegeneration in Murine Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell 183 (6), 1733–1734. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hendrixson, D. R. (2006). A Phase-Variable Mechanism Controlling the Campylobacter Jejuni Flgr Response Regulator Influences Commensalism. Mol. Microbiol. 61 (6), 1646–1659. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05336.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hickey, T. E., McVeigh, A. L., Scott, D. A., Michielutti, R. E., Bixby, A., Carroll, S. A., et al. (2000). Campylobacter Jejuni Cytolethal Distending Toxin Mediates Release of Interleukin-8 From Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Infect. Immun. 68 (12), 6535–6541. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.12.6535-6541.2000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, L., Kopecko, D. J. (1999). Campylobacter Jejuni 81-176 Associates With Microtubules and Dynein During Invasion of Human Intestinal Cells. Infect. Immun. 67 (8), 4171–4182. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.8.4171-4182.1999

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jung, C. H., Ro, S. H., Cao, J., Otto, N. M., Kim, D. H. (2010). Mtor Regulation of Autophagy. FEBS Lett. 584 (7), 1287–1295. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.01.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kageyama, S., Omori, H., Saitoh, T., Sone, T., Guan, J. L., Akira, S., et al. (2011). The LC3 Recruitment Mechanism Is Separate From Atg9L1-Dependent Membrane Formation in the Autophagic Response Against Salmonella. Mol. Biol. Cell 22 (13), 2290–2300. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e10-11-0893

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karanasios, E., Walker, S. A., Okkenhaug, H., Manifava, M., Hummel, E., Zimmermann, H., et al. (2016). Autophagy Initiation by ULK Complex Assembly on ER Tubulovesicular Regions Marked by ATG9 Vesicles. Nat. Commun. 7, 12420. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12420

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kido, J., Shimohatat, Amano, S., Hatayama, S., Nguyen, A. Q., Sato, Y., et al. (2017). Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Reduces Microtubule-Dependent Campylobacter Jejuni Invasion. Infect. Immun. 85 (10), e00311–17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00311-17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Konkel, M. E., Garvis, S. G., Tipton, S. L., Anderson, D. E., Cieplak, W. (1997). Identification and Molecular Cloning of a Gene Encoding a Fibronectin-Binding Protein (Cadf) From Campylobacter Jejuni. Mol. Microbiol. 24 (5), 953–963. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4031771.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Krause-Gruszczynska, M., Rohde, M., Hartig, R., Genth, H., Schmidt, G., Keo, T., et al. (2007). Role of the Small Rho Gtpases Rac1 and Cdc42 in Host Cell Invasion of Campylobacter Jejuni. Cell Microbiol. 9 (10), 2431–2444. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00971.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Levine, B., Mizushima, N., Virgin, H. W. (2011). Autophagy in Immunity and Inflammation. Nature 469 (7330), 323–335. doi: 10.1038/nature09782

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, L., Ma, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, Q., Liu, X. (2019). The Signaling Axis of Rac1-TFEB Regulates Autophagy and Tumorigenesis. Anticancer Drugs 30 (10), 1031–1037. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000816

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martinez, J., Almendinger, J., Oberst, A., Ness, R., Dillon, C. P., Fitzgerald, P., et al. (2011). Microtubule-Associated Protein 1 Light Chain 3 Alpha (LC3)-Associated Phagocytosis is Required for the Efficient Clearance of Dead Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108 (42), 17396–17401. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113421108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martinez, J., Malireddi, R. K., Lu, Q., Cunha, L. D., Pelletier, S., Gingras, S., et al. (2015). Molecular Characterization of LC3-Associated Phagocytosis Reveals Distinct Roles for Rubicon, NOX2 and Autophagy Proteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 17 (7), 893–906. doi: 10.1038/ncb3192

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mercer, C. A., Kaliappan, A., Dennis, P. B. (2009). A Novel, Human Atg13 Binding Protein, Atg101, Interacts With ULK1 and is Essential for Macroautophagy. Autophagy 5 (5), 649–662. doi: 10.4161/auto.5.5.8249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mizushima, N. (2007). Autophagy: Process and Function. Genes Dev. 21 (22), 2861–2873. doi: 10.1101/gad.1599207

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mizushima, N., Yoshimori, T. (2007). How to Interpret LC3 Immunoblotting. Autophagy 3 (6), 542–545. doi: 10.4161/auto.4600

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakagawa, I., Amano, A., Mizushima, N., Yamamoto, A., Yamaguchi, H., Kamimoto, T., et al. (2004). Autophagy Defends Cells Against Invading Group a Streptococcus. Science 306 (5698), 1037–1040. doi: 10.1126/science.1103966

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakano, M., Yamasaki, E., Ichinose, A., Shimohatat, Takahashi, A., Akada, J. K., et al. (2012). Salmonella Enterotoxin (Stn) Regulates Membrane Composition and Integrity. Dis. Model Mech. 5 (4), 515–521. doi: 10.1242/dmm.009324

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ogawa, M., Yoshimori, T., Suzuki, T., Sagara, H., Mizushima, N., Sasakawa, C. (2005). Escape of Intracellular Shigella From Autophagy. Science 307 (5710), 727–731. doi: 10.1126/science.1106036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parkhill, J., Wren, B. W., Mungall, K., Ketley, J. M., Churcher, C., Basham, D., et al. (2000). The Genome Sequence of the Food-Borne Pathogen Campylobacter Jejuni Reveals Hypervariable Sequences. Nature 403 (6770), 665–668. doi: 10.1038/35001088

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Starr, T., Child, R., Wehrly, T. D., Hansen, B., Hwang, S., López-Otin, C., et al. (2012). Selective Subversion of Autophagy Complexes Facilitates Completion of the Brucella Intracellular Cycle. Cell Host Microbe 11 (1), 33–45. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.12.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Steele, S., Brunton, J., Ziehr, B., Taft-Benz, S., Moorman, N., Kawulat, T. (2013). Francisella Tularensis Harvests Nutrients Derived via ATG5-Independent Autophagy to Support Intracellular Growth. PloS Pathog. 9 (8), e1003562. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003562

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sudhakar, P., Jacomin, A. C., Hautefort, I., Samavedam, S., Fatemian, K., Ari, E., et al. (2019). Targeted Interplay Between Bacterial Pathogens and Host Autophagy. Autophagy 15 (9), 1620–1633. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1590519

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Talukdar, P. K., Negrettin, M., Turner, K. L., Konkel, M. E. (2020). Molecular Dissection of the Campylobacter Jejuni Cadf and Flpa Virulence Proteins in Binding to Host Cell Fibronectin. Microorganisms 8 (3). doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8030389

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tattoli, I., Sorbara, M. T., Vuckovic, D., Ling, A., Soares, F., Carneiro, L. A., et al. (2012). Amino Acid Starvation Induced by Invasive Bacterial Pathogens Triggers an Innate Host Defense Program. Cell Host Microbe 11 (6), 563–575. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.04.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wooldridge, K. G., Williams, P. H., Ketley, J. M. (1996). Host Signal Transduction and Endocytosis of Campylobacter Jejuni. Microb. Pathog. 21 (4), 299–305. doi: 10.1006/mpat.1996.0063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, W., Zhang, W., Sun, M., Lu, C., Shen, Y., et al. (2018). Deacetylmycoepoxydiene is an Agonist of Rac1, and Simultaneously Induces Autophagy and Apoptosis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 102 (14), 5965–5975. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9058-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Z., Klionsky, D. J. (2009). An Overview of the Molecular Mechanism of Autophagy. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 335, 1–32. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-00302-8_1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoshikawa, Y., Ogawa, M., Hain, T., Yoshida, M., Fukumatsu, M., Kim, M., et al. (2009). Listeria Monocytogenes Acta-Mediated Escape From Autophagic Recognition. Nat. Cell Biol. 11 (10), 1233–1240. doi: 10.1038/ncb1967

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, M. L., Zhao, G. L., Hou, Y., Zhong, S. M., Xu, L. J., Li, F., et al. (2020). Rac1 Conditional Deletion Attenuates Retinal Ganglion Cell Apoptosis by Accelerating Autophagic Flux in a Mouse Model of Chronic Ocular Hypertension. Cell Death Dis. 11 (9), 734. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-02951-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: campylobacter jejuni, autophagy, LC3, Rac1, invasion

Citation: Fukushima S, Shimohata T, Inoue Y, Kido J, Uebanso T, Mawatari K and Takahashi A (2022) Recruitment of LC3 by Campylobacter jejuni to Bacterial Invasion Site on Host Cells via the Rac1-Mediated Signaling Pathway. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 12:829682. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.829682

Received: 06 December 2021; Accepted: 02 February 2022;
Published: 03 March 2022.

Edited by:

Cedric Nicolas Berger, Cardiff University, United Kingdom

Reviewed by:

Gang Pei, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Germany
Roberto Rosales-Reyes, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico

Copyright © 2022 Fukushima, Shimohata, Inoue, Kido, Uebanso, Mawatari and Takahashi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Takaaki Shimohata, shimohata@tokushima-u.ac.jp; takshimo@fpu.ac.jp

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.