Abstract
Background:
The role of lung epithelial cells in HIV-1-related lung comorbidities remains unclear, and the major hurdle in curing HIV is the persistence of latent HIV reservoirs in people living with HIV (PLWH). The advent of combined antiretroviral therapy has considerably increased the life span; however, the incidence of chronic lung diseases is significantly higher among PLWH. Lung epithelial cells orchestrate the respiratory immune responses and whether these cells are productively infected by HIV-1 is debatable.
Methods:
Normal human bronchial epithelial cells (NHBEs) grown on air–liquid interface were infected with X4-tropic HIV-1LAV and examined for latency using latency-reversing agents (LRAs). The role of CD4 and CXCR4 HIV coreceptors in NHBEs were tested, and DNA sequencing analysis was used to analyze the genomic integration of HIV proviral genes, Alu-HIVgag-pol, HIV-nef, and HIV-LTR. Lung epithelial sections from HIV-infected humans and SHIV-infected macaques were analyzed by FISH for HIV-gag-pol RNA and epithelial cell-specific immunostaining.
Results and Discussion:
NHBEs express CD4 and CXCR4 at higher levels than A549 cells. NHBEs are infected with HIV-1 basolaterally, but not apically, by X4-tropic HIV-1LAV in a CXCR4/CD4-dependent manner leading to HIV-p24 antigen production; however, NHBEs are induced to express CCR5 by IL-13 treatment. In the presence of cART, HIV-1 induces latency and integration of HIV provirus in the cellular DNA, which is rescued by the LRAs (endotoxin/vorinostat). Furthermore, lung epithelial cells from HIV-infected humans and SHIV-infected macaques contain HIV-specific RNA transcripts. Thus, lung epithelial cells are targeted by HIV-1 and could serve as potential HIV reservoirs that may contribute to the respiratory comorbidities in PLWH.
Introduction
In the era of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), the life span of PLWH has increased considerably; however, the incidence of obstructive lung diseases (OLDs) is significantly higher in PLWH (Maitre et al., 2018; Singhvi et al., 2019). A major hurdle in curing HIV is the persistence of latent HIV reservoirs in PLWH (Richman et al., 2009; Vanhamel et al., 2019). While CD4+ memory T cells are the recognized HIV reservoirs (Chun et al., 1997), recent evidence has demonstrated the presence of a minor macrophage subpopulation, which harbors HIV-1 in cART-treated HIV-infected subjects (Andrade et al., 2020). Lungs are established reservoirs of HIV-1 (Almodovar, 2014); however they may also be one of the preferred HIV sanctuaries in cART-treated subjects. Thus, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is enriched in memory T cells and BAL cells contain 13-fold higher HIV-DNA than peripheral blood mononuclear cells (Costiniuk et al., 2018). The role of epithelial cells as HIV-1 targets is ambiguous. For example, the foreskin epithelial cells are known to express HIV coreceptors (Liu et al., 2014), and upon coculturing, transfers the HIV to lymphocytes (Yasen et al., 2017). NHBEs express CXCR4 and respond to X4-tropic gp120 treatment (Gundavarapu et al., 2013), and herein, we show that they also express CCR5 after IL-13 treatment; however, whether these cells are productively infected by HIV-1 remains debatable (Brune et al., 2016; Chinnapaiyan et al., 2017). Previously, we reported that lung tissues of cynomolgus macaques (CMs) infected with simian-adapted HIV (SHIV) had significantly higher HIV-gp120-positive epithelial cells (Chand et al., 2018); however, the source of gp120 was not established. In this study, we demonstrate that HIV-infected NHBEs, grown on the air–liquid interphase (ALI) produce HIV-p24, and the surviving HIV-1-infected cells harbor the HIV-provirus integrated within the host cell genome, which is activated by latency-reversing agents (LRAs). Moreover, ex-vivo analysis of lung epithelial cells from HIV-infected human subjects and SHIV-infected macaque lungs harbor HIV-specific RNA, suggesting a productive infection of lung epithelial cells by HIV-1 in both in-vitro and in-vivo.
Materials and Methods
Normal Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells and ALI culture
Normal Human Bronchial Epithelial cells (NHBEs) were obtained from MatTek Incorp (EpiAirway™, Ashland, MA) and cultured as described previously (Hussain et al., 2018). The apical surface of the cells was exposed to air, and the cells were incubated in the media (provided by MatTek) for 48 h at 37°C before infection with HIV-1.
HIV-Infected Lung Tissue Sections
The archived lung tissue sections were kindly provided by the National NeuroAIDS Tissue Consortium (NNTC) and Lung Tissue Research Consortium (LTRC) of NIH. The formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded human patient samples were from HIV-1-negative (HIV−) donors and HIV-1-positive (HIV+) subjects, and from HIV+ subjects on HAART (HIV+HAART). The lung tissue sections from SHIV-infected (SHIV+) and cigarette smoke (CS)-exposed SHIV+ macaques (CS+SHIV) were obtained from the study reported previously (Chand et al., 2018).
HIV Infection and p24 Analysis
The X4-tropic viral strain HIV-1LAV was employed in these studies. NHBEs grown in air–liquid-interface (ALI) in transwells were infected either basolaterally (BL) or apically (AP) with X4-tropic HIV-1LAV (5 ng/ml p24 equivalent). Control cultures received only the medium. Control and infected transwells were incubated for 2 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. At 2 h post-infection, BL-infected cells were washed 4× with 2 ml PBS and the apically AP-infected cells with 0.5 ml PBS. The fourth wash from all cultures was analyzed for HIV-1-p24 level to ensure removal of the residual virus; this time point was designated as 0-time. Fresh medium was added to the cultures, and the plates were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2; the cultures were harvested at the indicated times.
The p24 concentration in the transwell culture media was measured using a p24 capture ELISA kit as per manufacturer’s instructions (ZeptoMetrix Corp. Cat # 0801200 or Advance Bioscience Laboratories, Rockville, MD, USA). To promote latently in HIV-infected AECs, following infection of NHBEs with HIV-1, where indicated, the cells were transferred to the medium containing cART (a cocktail of ritonavir, tenofovir, and emtricitabine) for 6 days. The cells were washed, transferred to the culture medium without cART and, where indicated, treated with the latency-reversing agents (LRAs) vorinostat and LPS, as described before (Archin et al., 2012; Alvarez-Carbonell et al., 2017). At 24 h after the transfer, culture media were harvested and assayed for p24 levels.
Immunostaining and Fluorescent Imaging Analysis
For immunohistochemical staining, deparaffinized and hydrated lung tissue sections were washed with PBS containing 0.05% Brij-35 (pH 7.4) and immunostained for antigen expression as described previously (Chand et al., 2018). Briefly, the antigens were unmasked by steaming the sections in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) followed by incubation in a blocking solution containing 3% BSA, 1% Gelatin, and 1% normal donkey serum with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.1% Saponin; the sections were stained with antibodies to CD4 (Abcam, #ab133616), CXCR4 (Abcam, #ab181020), HIV-Tat (Abcam, #ab63957) and pan-CK (#4545, Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA). Similarly, to stain NHBEs, the cells were grown on coated coverslips or the coated Labtek-II slides (Thermo Fisher Inc.) and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. The slides were washed with PBS containing 0.05% Brij-35 (pH 7.4) and immunostained as described previously (Chand et al., 2017). Briefly, non-specific binding sites on the cells were blocked by a solution containing 3% BSA, 1% Gelatin, and 1% normal donkey serum with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.1% Saponin. The cells were then treated with antibodies to CD4, CXCR4, and pan-CK, as described above. The labeled cells/tissue sections were stained with appropriate second antibodies conjugated with fluorescent dyes (Jackson ImmunoResearch Lab Inc., West Grove, PA). The slides were treated with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) containing Fluormount-GTM (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL) to visualize cell nuclei. Immunofluorescent images were captured using BZX700 Microscopy system (Keyence Corp., Japan) and analyzed using NIH Image J software.
DNA Isolation
To isolate DNA from the transwell-grown NHBEs, cells were dislodged from the filters and digested in 2.0 ml Eppendorf tubes containing 1.5 ml of digestion buffer (pH 8.0) comprising SDS, EDTA, and proteinase K as per manufacturer’s instructions (MatTek Corp, MA, USA). Total DNA from the control and HIV-1 treated NHBEs was isolated using Qiagen DNA extraction kit (Germantown, MD, USA) and quantified using Nanodrop (Applied Biosystems, ThermoFisher).
HIV-1 Gag DNA Quantification
The HIV-1 infected NHBEs were collected from the transwells at different time points (0, 2, 4, 24, 48, and 96 h) after infection. DNA was isolated from the cells using Qiagen DNA extraction kit per manufacturer’s instructions (QIAGEN Germantown, MD, USA), and cell associated HIV-1 gag DNA was quantified as described by Pasternak et al. (2008). using Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 3 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA), and the data was used to calculate HIV-1 gag copies/ng of DNA.
Alu-Gag PCR and Nucleotide Sequencing
We utilized the methods as described previously (Liszewski et al., 2009) in which a two-step Alu-gag PCR assay was used to determine the presence of integrated HIV-1 proviral DNA. This method utilizes a nested PCR approach. Briefly, during the 1st round PCR, the region between HIV-1 gag gene and nearest Alu repeat element of host genome was amplified. The primer sequences used in the 1st step PCR were: Alu Forward: 5′-GCCTCCCAAAGTGCTGGGATTACAG-3′ and HIV gag reverse: 5′-GTTCCTGCTATGTCACTTCC-3′ which corresponds to nucleotide (nt) 1,505–1,486 of HIV-1 HXB2 genome. The reactions were carried out in 50 µl and contained 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs mix, 100 nM Alu Forward primer, 600 nM HIV gag reverse primer and 5 U of Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Life Technologies; USA). In the 2nd round PCR, the 5′ LTR region of HIV-1 was amplified using 1 µl of the 1st round PCR amplicon as the template. The primers for the second round were: 5′ LTR Forward: 5′-TTAAGCCTCAATAAAGCTTGCC-3′ and 5′ LTR Reverse: 5′-GTTCCTGCTATGTCACTTCC-3′. The PCR amplification was carried out in Applied Biosystem 9700 thermal cycler under the following conditions, 1st round of PCR: 95°C for 2 m, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s, 50°C (Tm) for 15 s, and 72°C for 3.5 min; 2nd round of PCR: 95°C for 2 m, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s, 60°C (Tm) for 15 s and 72°C for 30 s. PCR amplicons were resolved on a 2% agarose gel (Promega Corporation, Madison, USA) pre-stained with Ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/ml). The gel images were documented using a Bio Rad gel documentation system (BIORAD, USA).
The PCR amplicons were purified using QIAGEN PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Germany) as per the manufacturer’s instructions and subjected to Sanger sequencing using BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, California; USA). Automated capillary electrophoresis was performed on an ABI PRISM® 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, California; USA) using data collection software v.3.1 at the University of Nebraska Medical Center DNA Sequencing Core facility. The raw sequence data were manually edited, spliced, and assembled by Sequencher v4.9 to generate the final contig. Multiple sequence alignment of edited sequence was performed with HIV-1LAV reference sequence of HIV-1 using Clustal W (Aiyar, 2000).
HIV-1 Gag DNA Amplification and Sequencing
HIV-1 gag DNA from infected NHBEs was amplified essentially using the primers, probes, and PCR protocol described previously (Khoja et al., 2008). Briefly, primers used in first round of PCR on cellular DNA were forward primer (5′-CTCTCGACGCAGGACTCGGCTTGC-3′, nt 683–706, HXB2) and reverse primer (5′-CCAATTCCCCCTATCATTTTTGG-3′, nt 2,382–2,404) with a Tm of 58°C. For the second round of amplification, forward primer (5′-GAGGCTAGAAGGAGAGAGATGGG-3′, nt 772–794, HXB2) and GIPR (5′-TTATTGTGACGAGGGGTCGTTGCC-3′, nt 2,269–2,292) with a Tm of 60°C were used. The amplicon (1,520 bp) was analyzed on 1.2% agarose gels following ethidium bromide staining. For sequencing, the amplified DNA product was extracted from the agarose gel, and purified, using QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Cat#28704, Qiagen Inc.) based on the manufacturer’s instructions. The product was sent for sequencing to Sequetech Corp (Mountain View, CA).
HIV-1 Nef DNA Amplification and Sequencing
Nef DNA was also amplified by a two-step nested PCR strategy as described previously (Shugars et al., 1993). Briefly, the two sets of amplification primers were designed to anneal to highly conserved segments flanking the HIV-1 nef gene. The primers used for the first round of amplification were, forward primer (5′-AATAGAGTTAGGCAGGGATA-3′, nt 8,338-8,358, HXB2) and reverse primer (5′-CTGGTCTAACCAGAGAGACCCAGTAC-3′, nt 9,533-9,558) with a Tm of 55°C. For the second round of amplification, forward primer (5′-CTCGCAGTCTAGAAGAATAAGACAGGGCTTGGAAAGG-3′, nt 8,754-8,782, HXB2) and reverse primer (5′-CGTCCAGAATTCGGAAAGTCCCCAGCGGAAAGTC-3′, nt 9,436–9,457) were used that included the restriction sites for XbaI and EcoR1, respectively and amplified at the Tm of 55°C. The PCR product from the first round of amplification (1,200 bp) was diluted 1:100 for the second round of amplification using 30 PCR cycles. The PCR product (703 bp) was visualized by ethidium bromide staining and agarose gel electrophoresis. The amplified Nef DNA was extracted from the agarose gel, purified using QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit, and sent for sequencing to Sequetech Corp (Mountain View, CA).
Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from the experimental cells using RNAeasy kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) as per manufacturer’s instruction. RNA concentration was determined using the Synergy HTX Multi-Mode reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT), and cDNA was synthesized using iScript advanced cDNA kit (BioRad, Hercules, CA). The primer/probe sets for CD4, HIV-LTR RNA, and MUC5AC were obtained from Applied Biosystems (Thermo Fisher Inc.). The amplified cDNA was quantified by qPCR using the TaqMan Gene expression kit (Thermo Fisher Inc.) in the Stratagene Mx3000P Real-Time PCR System (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Relative quantities were calculated by normalizing the averaged CT values to CDKN1B or GAPDH to obtain ΔCT, and the fold-change (ΔΔCT) over the controls was determined as described previously (Chand et al., 2017).
Lactate Dehydrogenase Release Assay
The loss of plasma membrane integrity is considered as a maker of cell death and is measured as the release of cytosolic LDH in culture media after the rupture of plasma membrane. The concentration of LDH in the culture supernatants collected from HIV-1 infected NHBE transwells was measured by using CytoTox96 assay (Promega, Madison, WI) as per manufacturer’s instructions.
RNA Fluorescent In-Situ Hybridization
RNA FISH was essentially performed using the RNAscope® Fluorescent Multiplexed reagent kit (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Newark, CA) as per the manufacturer’s protocol and as reported recently (Devadoss et al., 2020). Briefly, the probe set for HIVgag-pol consisted of 20 dual probes targeting different segments within the whole transcript (Advanced Cell Diagnostics). Deparaffinized and permeabilized lung sections were hybridized with probes for 2 h at 40°C using a HyBEZ® oven (Advanced Cell Diagnostics), and the signal was amplified by serial incubation in amplification buffers and HRP-tagged probe (Thermo Fisher Inc), at 40°C using a HyBEZ® oven. Probes were detected using Tyramide signal amplification (TSA) reaction using an Alexa-flour-labeled TSA kit (PerkinElmer Bioscience) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The sections were processed for immunostaining of panCK as described above, followed by mounting with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) containing Fluormount-G (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL) to visualize the nuclei. Immunofluorescence images were captured with BZX700 Microscopy system (Keyence Corp, Japan) and analyzed by NIH ImageJ software. RNA FISH expression was quantified by the analysis and as reported recently (Devadoss et al., 2020). Briefly, signals (dots/cell) for each transcript probe were counted and allocated to separate bins with Bin 0 (0 Dots/Cell); Bin 1 (1–3 Dots/Cell); Bin 2 (4–9 Dots/Cell); Bin 3 (10–15 Dots/Cell); Bin 4 (>15 Dots/Cell). The histology score (H-Score) was calculated as Sum of each (bin number × percentage of cells per bin) that ranged from 0 to 400 based on the transcript’s expression.
Western Blot Analysis
Cell extracts were prepared using RIPA buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 137 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.25% Deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM EDTA and 1% protease inhibitor). Protein concentration was determined by BCA kit (Pierce; Rockford, IL), and 50 µg of protein was analyzed by western blotting as described previously (Hussain et al., 2018). Proteins were detected by ECL and visualized by chemiluminescence (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) using the BioRad Chemidoc Imaging system (Hercules, CA).
Statistical Analysis
Grouped results were expressed as means ± SEM. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism Software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). Grouped results were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance. When the effects were significant (p ≤ 0.05), the Fisher’s least significant difference test was used to determine differences between groups.
Results and Discussion
Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells Intrinsically Express CD4 and CXCR4, and Express CCR5 Upon IL-13 Treatment
CD4, CXCR4, and CCR5 are HIV-1 receptors/coreceptors (Brelot and Chakrabarti, 2018). NHBEs express CXCR4 (Eddleston et al., 2002; Gundavarapu et al., 2013), and it is X4- but not the R5-tropic HIV-gp120 that induces airway inflammatory mucus in these cells (Gundavarapu et al., 2013). Based on the qPCR and immunoblot analysis, compared to A549 (a human alveolar epithelial cell line), NHBEs showed >50-fold higher expression of CD4 mRNA (Figure 1A) and >5-fold higher CD4 protein levels (Figures 1B, C). Immunocytometry staining indicated that, in addition to CXCR4 (Figure 1D), NHBEs exhibited high levels of CD4 expression (Figure 1E), and the CD4 levels were approximately 3.5-fold higher than CXCR4 (Figure 1F). Thus, NHBEs express HIV-1 receptor CD4 and coreceptor CXCR4, rendering them as potential HIV-1 targets.
Figure 1
The expression CCR5 on NHBEs is not unequivocal (Brune et al., 2016; Chinnapaiyan et al., 2017). During carcinogenesis, epithelial cells have been shown to express CCR5 that enhances their resistance to cytotoxicity (Jiao et al., 2019). Th2 responses in the lung are common and are induced by infections and exposure to allergens (Hansbro et al., 2014). IL-13 is a key Th2 cytokine, which is strongly upregulated in the lungs of SHIV-infected macaques (Chand et al., 2018). Moreover, CCR5 plays a critical role in the IL-13-induced lung pathogenesis (Ma et al., 2006). Therefore, we determined whether IL-13 affects the expression of CCR5 on NHBE cells. As shown in Figure 1G, IL-13 (1 ng/ml) treatment induced the significant levels of CCR5 in NHBEs. Therefore, it is likely that in-vivo lung epithelial cells are primed to express CCR5.
X4-Tropic HIV-1LAV Infects NHBEs
Among the HIV-1 patients, the R5 (CCR5-tropic) HIV-1 variants predominate over the course of infection, and the X4 (CXCR4-tropic) variants arise later (Poon et al., 2012); however, nearly 22% of patients on cART principally harbor the X4 variants (Ferrer et al., 2014). Moreover, a recent study indicated that X4 variants are mainly associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension—a lung condition quite prevalent among PLWH (Almodovar et al., 2020). Most importantly, NHBEs explicitly express CXCR4 (Eddleston et al., 2002; Gundavarapu et al., 2013), and the X4- but not the R5-tropic HIV-gp120 induces inflammatory mucus response in NHBEs (Gundavarapu et al., 2013). Therefore, to ascertain whether NHBEs are productively infected by HIV-1, ALI-differentiated NHBEs were infected with X4-tropic HIV-1LAV. Cellular DNA was isolated and assayed for HIV-gag by qPCR at denoted time points (Figure 2A), and the culture supernatants were analyzed for HIV-p24 levels (Figure 2B). Both HIV-1 titer (HIV-1 cell-associated DNA) and p24 levels reached maximum at 24 h and declined thereafter to very low levels at 96 h post-infection. HIV-1 infection induces cell death (Cooper et al., 2013), and HIV-1 infection of NHBEs showed increased levels of the cell-death marker lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (Figure S1).
Figure 2
Transmission of HIV-1 via oral or oropharyngeal route is highly unlikely (CDC Report August 6, 2019: www.cdc.gov/hiv/basics), and the saliva may inactivate HIV-1 (Baron et al., 1999). We analyzed the susceptibility of NHBEs to HIV-1 infection via basolateral (BL) versus AP apical (AP) side. NHBEs grown on ALI were infected with HIV-1 from either AP or BL surfaces, and p24 levels were measured at 24 h. LDH levels assessed at 2 and 24 h post-infection indicated that NHBEs are mainly sensitive to HIV-1 from BL side and relatively resistant to HIV infection from AP side (Figure 2C); and BL infection with HIV-1 showed increased LDH release (Figure 2D). Thus, the apical side of differentiated lung epithelial cells is essentially refractory to HIV-1 infection.
Next, to verify that basolateral HIV-1 infection is mediated via HIV receptors/coreceptors, NHBEs were pre-incubated with anti-CXCR4 and/or anti-CD4 antibodies. The HIV-LTR RNA levels were potently inhibited in cells pre-incubated with antibodies to CD4 and/or CXCR4 compared to control HIV-1 infected cells (Figure 2E). Similarly, HIV-1-induced MUC5AC mucin expression was significantly reduced in cells pretreated with CD4- and/or CXCR4-antibodies (Figure 2F). These data suggest that HIV-1 infection of bronchial epithelial cells is dependent on classical HIV-1 receptors/coreceptors.
HIV-1 Establishes Latency With Proviral DNA Integration Into NHBE Genome
Although HIV-1-induced cell death is associated with genomic integration of HIV-1 DNA (Cooper et al., 2013); the proviral integration in BECs remains uncertain. Treatment with antiretroviral drugs suppresses HIV-1 below detection limits but also promotes infected-cell survival and establishes HIV-1 latency (Dahabieh et al., 2015). The latent cells harbor replication-competent integrated HIV-1 provirus; however, the cells remain transcriptionally silent establishing them as viral reservoirs (Margolis and Archin, 2017; Sengupta and Siliciano, 2018). LRAs activate latent HIV-1 proviruses, leading to the production of the virus (Takahama and Yamamoto, 2020). We observed that the treatment of NHBEs with cART (a cocktail of ritonavir, tenofovir, and emtricitabine) at 0-time (i.e., 2h after HIV-1 infection), inhibited but failed to eliminate p24 expression at 8 h post-infection (Figure S1B).
To demonstrate that HIV-1 infects and establishes latency, NHBEs were infected with HIV-1LAV at 24 h after HIV-1 infection and the culture media were replaced with cART-containing media. Infected NHBEs were culture d for 6 more days, washed, and replenished with the culture media without cART and treated with the LRAs comprised of LPS, a gram-negative bacterial wall component and Vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) (Archin et al., 2012), After 24 h, the culture supernatants were harvested and assayed for p24 levels. As shown in Figure 3A, before the removal of cART, cells had very low levels of p24 (day 6 with cART); however, at 24 h after cART removal, there is a small but significant increase in p24 levels (7 day media control). Media harvested from cells treated with LRAs (7 day-HDACi/LPS) had significantly higher p24 levels suggesting that, in the presence of cART, NHBEs are latently infected by HIV-1, and the latency is reversed by LPS and vorinostat. Together, these results suggest that in the presence of cART, HIV-1 infection of NHBEs yields latently infected cells and the latent HIV-1 provirus is activated by LRAs, leading to the reemergence of proviral factors.
Figure 3
For productive infection and proviral latency, HIV-1 DNA needs to be integrated into the host genome (Craigie and Bushman, 2012). To demonstrate that HIV-1 DNA is integrated into NHBEs, we analyzed genes in 5′- and 3′-LTR of HIV (i.e. gag and Nef genes, respectively). DNA isolated from control and HIV-infected NHBEs was used to amplify HIV-gag in a nested PCR, and there was a single 1.52 kb amplicon present in the infected cells (Figure S2A). The amplicon was isolated and sequenced (Figure S2B); the sequence alignment confirmed >99% identity to the HIV-1 gag sequence. Similarly, Nef gene was amplified using the nested-PCR approach that yielded a single amplicon of 703 bp (Figure S3A). The sequencing analysis confirmed >99% identity to HIV-1 Nef sequence (Figure S3B). In the second approach, a two-step Alu-gag PCR assay was employed (Figure 3B). The two rounds of PCRs resulted in a 130 bp amplicon of 5′-LTR of HIV-1 genome (Figure 3C), and the amplicon was sequenced (Figure 3D). The sequence alignment of the raw sequencing data exactly matched with the reference sequence of LTR-gag region of HIV-1 strain used for the infection (Figure 3E), confirming the chromosomal integration of HIV provirus in NHBEs. Taken together, these data support the presence of several HIV-1 genes in the cellular DNA from HIV-infected NHBE cells and the association of Alu sequences with the LTR DNA. Alu sequences are present only in primate DNA (Quentin and Fichant, 1994) and represent at least 20% of human genome (Schmid, 1996). Thus, the association of Alu sequences with HIV-specific LTR DNA clearly indicates that HIV is integrated within the NHBE cellular DNA.
HIV RNA Present in Lung Epithelial Cells From SHIV-Infected Macaques and HIV-Infected Human Subjects
To ascertain whether HIV replicates in-vivo in airway epithelial cells, we evaluated lung sections for HIV-specific RNA by FISH using RNAScope® and HIV-gag-pol probes (ACD Biotechne Inc.). HIV-specific gag-pol RNA showed 20-fold higher expression in SHIV-infected pan-cytokeratin (pCK)-positive BECs than uninfected control lungs (Figures 4A, B). Moreover, SHIV infection of cigarette smoke (CS)-exposed macaques (CS+SHIV) showed about three-fold higher levels of HIV-specific RNA than HIV-infected controls, thus, supporting the evidence that combined exposure of CMs to CS and SHIV is more injurious to the lung than independent exposures to either SHIV or CS (Chand et al., 2018). Similarly, the lung sections from HIV-infected subjects showed >25-fold higher levels of HIV-specific RNA in pCK-positive epithelial cells, and the high levels of the RNAs persisted (14-fold higher than controls) in HIV subjects undergoing HAART (HIV+HAART) compared to uninfected human airway control sections (Figures 4C, D). These results underscore the inference that both in humans and in macaques, the lung epithelial cells are targets of HIV-1 infection and might be responsible for the higher respiratory comorbidities among PLWH.
Figure 4
Lung is an important reservoir for HIV-1 (Almodovar, 2014; Costiniuk et al., 2018), and herein, we demonstrate that the airway epithelial cells are targets of HIV-1 infection in both in-vitro and in-vivo settings and that in the presence of cART the cells harbor latent HIV-1 provirus. Lung bronchial epithelial cells are crucial innate immune cells and the first line of defense against airborne pathogens (Wu et al., 2011). In the respiratory tract, airway epithelial cells are constantly exposed to airborne pathogens, including LPS-containing gram-negative bacteria (Hayes et al., 2013), and we have shown that LPS, a signature molecule in gram-negative bacteria, in conjunction with Vorinostat, can activate the latent HIV-provirus in HIV-infected airway epithelial cells. Given that airway epithelial cells are very long-lived (Rawlins and Hogan, 2008), in the presence of cART, these cells are likely to make good targets for latent HIV infections and may significantly contribute to the HIV-1-reservoir function of the lung.
Funding
The authors acknowledge the funding support by NIH R01HL125000 (to MS), R01DA047089 (to SR), and R21AI144374, R21AI152937, R21AI117560, R01HL147715, and the FIU Start-Up Funds (to HSC). S.A.B. is supported in part by NIH P30CA11800 grant to C. Willman.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
All experimental protocols carried out on cynomologus macaques were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM in accordance with the Guidelines from the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation for Laboratory Animal Care International as reported recently (Chand et al., 2018).
Author contributions
DD and SS performed the sample analysis, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. AA, KD, PP, MM, NM, and CT performed the sample analysis and analyzed the data. SR, SAB, SNB, and SB analyzed the data. HSC and MS designed the studies, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the help from the Inhalation and Necropsy Cores of Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute and thank Gilead Sciences, Inc. CA for the gift of antiretroviral drugs Tenofovir and emtricitabine. We also appreciate the technical support provided by Ruben Castro.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2020.612360/full#supplementary-material
Abbreviations
ALI, Air-liquid interface; AP, Apical side; BECs, Bronchial epithelial cells; BL, Basolateral side; cART, Combined antiretroviral therapy; CD4, Cluster of differentiation 4; CMs, Cynomolgus macaques; COPD, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CS, Cigarette smoke; CXCR4, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4; FISH, Fluorescent In-Situ Hybridization; Gag, Group specific antigen; HAART, Highly active antiretroviral therapy; HDACi, Histone deacetylase inhibitor; HIV-1, Human immunodeficiency virus type-1; LDH, Lactate dehydrogenase; LPS, Lipopolysaccharide; LRAs, Latency-reversing agents; LTRs, Long-terminal repeats; Nef, Negative regulatory factor; NHBEs, Normal human bronchial epithelial cells; OLD, Obstructive lung diseases; pCK, Pan cytokeratin; PLWH, People living with HIV; SHIV, Simian-adapted HIV.
References
1
AiyarA. (2000). The use of CLUSTAL W and CLUSTAL X for multiple sequence alignment. Methods Mol. Biol.132, 221–241. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-192-2:221
2
AlmodovarS.WadeB. E.PorterK. M.SmithJ. M.Lopez-AstacioR. A.BijliK.et al. (2020). HIV X4 Variants Increase Arachidonate 5-Lipoxygenase in the Pulmonary Microenvironment and are associated with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Sci. Rep.10, 11696. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68060-9
3
AlmodovarS. (2014). The complexity of HIV persistence and pathogenesis in the lung under antiretroviral therapy: challenges beyond AIDS. Viral Immunol.27, 186–199. doi: 10.1089/vim.2013.0130
4
Alvarez-CarbonellD.Garcia-MesaY.MilneS.DasB.DobrowolskiC.KarnJ. (2017). Toll-like receptor 3 activation selectively reverses HIV latency in microglial cells. Retrovirology14, 9. doi: 10.1186/s12977-017-0335-8
5
AndradeV. M.MavianC.BabicD.CordeiroT.SharkeyM.BarriosL.et al. (2020). A minor population of macrophage-tropic HIV-1 variants is identified in recrudescing viremia following analytic treatment interruption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.117, 9981–9990. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917034117
6
ArchinN. M.LibertyA. L.KashubaA. D.ChoudharyS. K.KurucJ. D.CrooksA. M.et al. (2012). Administration of vorinostat disrupts HIV-1 latency in patients on antiretroviral therapy. Nature487, 482–485. doi: 10.1038/nature11286
7
BaronS.PoastJ.CloydM. W. (1999). Why is HIV rarely transmitted by oral secretions? Saliva can disrupt orally shed, infected leukocytes. Arch. Intern. Med.159, 303–310. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.3.303
8
BrelotA.ChakrabartiL. A. (2018). CCR5 Revisited: How Mechanisms of HIV Entry Govern AIDS Pathogenesis. J. Mol. Biol.430, 2557–2589. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.06.027
9
BruneK. A.FerreiraF.MandkeP.ChauE.AggarwalN. R.D’AlessioF. R.et al. (2016). HIV Impairs Lung Epithelial Integrity and Enters the Epithelium to Promote Chronic Lung Inflammation. PloS One11, e0149679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149679
10
ChandH. S.MebratuY. A.KuehlP. J.TesfaigziY. (2017). Blocking Bcl-2 resolves IL-13-mediated mucous cell hyperplasia in a Bik-dependent manner. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 140, 1456–1459.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.05.038
11
ChandH. S.Vazquez-GuillametR.RoyerC.RudolphK.MishraN.SinghS. P.et al. (2018). Cigarette smoke and HIV synergistically affect lung pathology in cynomolgus macaques. J. Clin. Invest.128, 5428–5433. doi: 10.1172/JCI121935
12
ChinnapaiyanS.PariraT.DuttaR.AgudeloM.MorrisA.NairM.et al. (2017). HIV Infects Bronchial Epithelium and Suppresses Components of the Mucociliary Clearance Apparatus. PloS One12, e0169161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169161
13
ChunT. W.CarruthL.FinziD.ShenX.DiGiuseppeJ. A.TaylorH.et al. (1997). Quantification of latent tissue reservoirs and total body viral load in HIV-1 infection. Nature387, 183–188. doi: 10.1038/387183a0
14
CooperA.GarciaM.PetrovasC.YamamotoT.KoupR. A.NabelG. J. (2013). HIV-1 causes CD4 cell death through DNA-dependent protein kinase during viral integration. Nature498, 376–379. doi: 10.1038/nature12274
15
CostiniukC. T.SalahuddinS.FarnosO.OlivensteinR.PagliuzzaA.OrlovaM.et al. (2018). HIV persistence in mucosal CD4+ T cells within the lungs of adults receiving long-term suppressive antiretroviral therapy. AIDS32, 2279–2289. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001962
16
CraigieR.BushmanF. D. (2012). HIV DNA integration. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med.2, a006890. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a006890
17
DahabiehM. S.BattivelliE.VerdinE. (2015). Understanding HIV latency: the road to an HIV cure. Annu. Rev. Med.66, 407–421. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-092112-152941
18
DevadossD.DalyG.ManevskiM.HouserovaD.HussainS. S.BaumlinN.et al. (2020). A long noncoding RNA antisense to ICAM-1 is involved in allergic asthma associated hyperreactive response of airway epithelial cells. Mucosal Immunol. doi: 10.1038/s41385-020-00352-9
19
EddlestonJ.ChristiansenS. C.ZurawB. L. (2002). Functional expression of the C-X-C chemokine receptor CXCR4 by human bronchial epithelial cells: regulation by proinflammatory mediators. J. Immunol.169, 6445–6451. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.11.6445
20
FerrerP.TelloM.MontecinosL.TordecillaR.RodriguezC.BeltranC.et al. (2014). Prevalence of R5 and X4 HIV variants in antiretroviral treatment experienced patients with virologic failure. J. Clin. Virol.60, 290–294. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.04.004
21
GundavarapuS.MishraN. C.SinghS. P.LangleyR. J.SaeedA. I.Feghali-BostwickC. A.et al. (2013). HIV gp120 induces mucus formation in human bronchial epithelial cells through CXCR4/alpha7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. PloS One8, e77160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077160
22
HansbroP. M.StarkeyM. R.MattesJ.HorvatJ. C. (2014). Pulmonary immunity during respiratory infections in early life and the development of severe asthma. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc.11 Suppl 5, S297–S302. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201402-086AW
23
HayesD.Jr.WeilandA.KirkbyS.GalantowiczM.McConnellP. I.TobiasJ. D. (2013). Gram-negative infection and bronchiectasis in lung transplant recipients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.61, 240–245. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1322619
24
HussainS. S.GeorgeS.SinghS.JayantR.HuC. A.SoporiM.et al. (2018). A Small Molecule BH3-mimetic Suppresses Cigarette Smoke-Induced Mucous Expression in Airway Epithelial Cells. Sci. Rep.8, 13796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32114-w
25
JiaoX.NawabO.PatelT.KossenkovA. V.HalamaN.JaegerD.et al. (2019). Recent Advances Targeting CCR5 for Cancer and Its Role in Immuno-Oncology. Cancer Res.79, 4801–4807. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-1167
26
KhojaS.OjwangP.KhanS.OkindaN.HaraniaR.AliS. (2008). Genetic analysis of HIV-1 subtypes in Nairobi, Kenya. PloS One3, e3191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003191
27
LiszewskiM. K.YuJ. J.O’DohertyU. (2009). Detecting HIV-1 integration by repetitive-sampling Alu-gag PCR. Methods (San Diego Calif.)47, 254–260. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.01.002
28
LiuA.YangY.LiuL.MengZ.LiL.QiuC.et al. (2014). Differential compartmentalization of HIV-targeting immune cells in inner and outer foreskin tissue. PloS One9, e85176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085176
29
MaB.LiuW.HomerR. J.LeeP. J.CoyleA. J.LoraJ. M.et al. (2006). Role of CCR5 in the pathogenesis of IL-13-induced inflammation and remodeling. J. Immunol.176, 4968–4978. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.8.4968
30
MaitreT.CottenetJ.BeltramoG.GeorgesM.BlotM.PirothL.et al. (2018). Increasing burden of noninfectious lung disease in persons living with HIV: a 7-year study using the French nationwide hospital administrative database. Eur. Respir. J.52, 1800359. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00359-2018
31
MargolisD. M.ArchinN. M. (2017). Proviral Latency, Persistent Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection, and the Development of Latency Reversing Agents. J. Infect. Dis.215, S111–S118. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw618
32
PasternakA. O.AdemaK. W.BakkerM.JurriaansS.BerkhoutB.CornelissenM.et al. (2008). Highly sensitive methods based on seminested real-time reverse transcription-PCR for quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 unspliced and multiply spliced RNA and proviral DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol.46, 2206–2211. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00055-08
33
PoonA. F.SwensonL. C.BunnikE. M.Edo-MatasD.SchuitemakerH.van ‘t WoutA. B.et al. (2012). Reconstructing the dynamics of HIV evolution within hosts from serial deep sequence data. PloS Comput. Biol.8, e1002753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002753
34
QuentinY.FichantG. A. (1994). Fast identification of repetitive elements in biological sequences. J. Theor. Biol.166, 51–61. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1994.1004
35
RawlinsE. L.HoganB. L. (2008). Ciliated epithelial cell lifespan in the mouse trachea and lung. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.295, L231–L234. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.90209.2008
36
RichmanD. D.MargolisD. M.DelaneyM.GreeneW. C.HazudaD.PomerantzR. J. (2009). The challenge of finding a cure for HIV infection. Science323, 1304–1307. doi: 10.1126/science.1165706
37
SchmidC. W. (1996). Alu: structure, origin, evolution, significance and function of one-tenth of human DNA. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol.53, 283–319. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6603(08)60148-8
38
SenguptaS.SilicianoR. F. (2018). Targeting the Latent Reservoir for HIV-1. Immunity48, 872–895. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.030
39
ShugarsD. C.SmithM. S.GlueckD. H.NantermetP. V.Seillier-MoiseiwitschF.SwanstromR. (1993). Analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nef gene sequences present in vivo. J. Virol.67, 4639–4650. doi: 10.1128/JVI.67.8.4639-4650.1993
40
SinghviD.BonJ.MorrisA. (2019). Obstructive Lung Disease in HIV-Phenotypes and Pathogenesis. Curr. HIV/AIDS Rep.16, 359–369. doi: 10.1007/s11904-019-00456-3
41
TakahamaS.YamamotoT. (2020). Pattern Recognition Receptor Ligands as an Emerging Therapeutic Agent for Latent HIV-1 Infection. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol.10, 216. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00216
42
VanhamelJ.BruggemansA.DebyserZ. (2019). Establishment of latent HIV-1 reservoirs: what do we really know? J. Virus Erad.5, 3–9. doi: 10.1016/S2055-6640(20)30275-2
43
WuQ.JiangD.MinorM. N.MartinR. J.ChuH. W. (2011). In vivo function of airway epithelial TLR2 in host defense against bacterial infection. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.300, L579–L586. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00336.2010
44
YasenA.HerreraR.RosbeK.LienK.TugizovS. M. (2017). Release of HIV-1 sequestered in the vesicles of oral and genital mucosal epithelial cells by epithelial-lymphocyte interaction. PloS Pathog.13, e1006247. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006247
Summary
Keywords
lung epithelial cells, HIV receptors, genomic integration, HIV gag-pol, Nested-PCR, Fluorescent in-situ hybridization
Citation
Devadoss D, Singh SP, Acharya A, Do KC, Periyasamy P, Manevski M, Mishra N, Tellez CS, Ramakrishnan S, Belinsky SA, Byrareddy SN, Buch S, Chand HS and Sopori M (2021) HIV-1 Productively Infects and Integrates in Bronchial Epithelial Cells. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10:612360. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.612360
Received
30 September 2020
Accepted
24 December 2020
Published
04 February 2021
Volume
10 - 2020
Edited by
Jianfeng Dai, Soochow University, China
Reviewed by
Jean-Pierre Routy, McGill University, Canada; Celina Monteiro Abreu, Johns Hopkins Medicine, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Devadoss, Singh, Acharya, Do, Periyasamy, Manevski, Mishra, Tellez, Ramakrishnan, Belinsky, Byrareddy, Buch, Chand and Sopori.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mohan Sopori, msopori@lrri.org; Hitendra S. Chand, hchand@fiu.edu
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Virus and Host, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.