- 1State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- 2State Key Laboratory of Structural Chemistry, Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- 3Xiamen Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Photoelectric Functional Materials, Xiamen Institute of Rare Earth Materials, Haixi institutes, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, Fujian, China
- 4College of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- 5Changsha Ecological Environmental Monitoring Centre of Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan, China
Due to its exceptionally high theoretical energy density, fluorinated carbon has been recognized as a strong contender for the cathode material in lithium primary batteries particularly valued in aerospace and related industries. However, CFx cathode with high F/C ratio, which enables higher energy density, often suffer from inadequate rate capability and are unable to satisfy escalating demand. Furthermore, their intrinsic low discharge voltage imposes constraints on their applicability. In this study, a novel and high F/C ratio fluorinated carbon nanomaterials (FNC) enriched with semi-ionic C–F bonds is synthesized at a lower fluorination temperature, using aggregated nanocarbon as the precursor. The increased presence semi-ionic C–F bonds of the FNC enhances conductivity, thereby ameliorating ohmic polarization effects during initial discharge. In addition, the spherical shape and aggregated configuration of FNC facilitate the diffusion of Li+ to abundant active sites through continuous paths. Consequently, the FNC exhibits high discharge voltage of 3.15 V at 0.01C and superior rate capability in lithium primary batteries. At a high rate of 20C, power density of 33,694 W kg–1 and energy density of 1,250 Wh kg–1 are achieved. Moreover, FNC also demonstrates notable electrochemical performance in sodium/potassium-CFx primary batteries. This new-type alkali-metal/CFx primary batteries exhibit outstanding rate capability, rendering them with vast potential in high-power applications.
1 Introduction
The demand for primary batteries, in terms of power density and energy storage, has steadily increased in recent years owing to scientific and technological advancements, particularly in fields such as aerospace and deep-sea exploration (Zhu C. et al., 2022; Lu et al., 2023). The chemical composition of current and next-generation rechargeable batteries based on transition metal oxides, such as NiCO2O4-NiO(Ramachandran et al., 2023) and CoMn2O4 (Ramachandran et al., 2022), may not meet the specific energy requirements of fields such as aerospace. The fluorinated carbon (CFx) materials possess ultrahigh theoretical energy density, a broad range of operating temperature, and a stable operating voltage plateau, rendering them a potentially useful cathode material for lithium primary batteries with excellent performance (Jones et al., 2022; Guérin et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2024). Current researchers often improve the F/C ratio of CFx materials through carbon source design and improved fluorination process to obtain higher energy density (Zhang et al., 2009a; Jayasinghe et al., 2014). However, the high F/C ratio of CFx exhibits strong C–F binding and limited electric conductivity introduce several disadvantages, such as low operating voltage plateau, poor rate capability, and low power density (Jiang et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2009a). The development of CFx materials possessing high energy density and exceptional rate discharge performance is crucial (Zou et al., 2024).
To achieve this goal, numerous novel CFx materials have been synthesized in the past decade using various carbon precursors (Zhang et al., 2010). For instance, high electrical conductivity partly fluorinated graphite sheets were proposed by Yazami et al., the CF0.78 achieved a power density of 8,057 W kg–1 at 6C. To achieve a breakthrough in this performance, a further increase in the F/C ratio is required (Yazami et al., 2007), as revealed by 13C NMR studies. Neeraj Sharma et al. developed fluorinated nanocarbons, investigating the fluorination process of these materials and the connection between electrochemical performance and the type of C–F bond. The electrochemical lithiation process of fluorinated carbon CFx (x ≥ 0.5) was clarified through the use of in situ high-resolution 19F NMR, 7Li NMR, and TEM investigations. During the discharge process, LiF, CFL (L ≤ 0.06), and carbon were formed (Sharma et al., 2021). It has been found that the semi-ionic C–F bond in CFx plays a key role in its electrochemical properties CFx materials with semi-ionic C–F bonds and a fraction of sp2-hybridised C atoms exhibit high electronic conductivity (Zhong et al., 2018; Sato et al., 2004; Zhu D. et al., 2022).
Over the past few decades, nanocarbon has emerged in diverse dimensions ranging from 0D to 3D, eliciting consistent attention and interest from researchers. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene, both possess honeycomb lattices, are representative sp2 nanocarbons (Jiang et al., 2017). Due to their peculiar atomic networks and exhibit novel properties, they have been widely studied in terms of structure, properties, synthesis, and applications. Fluorinated nanocarbon materials with reducing particle size and shortening ion diffusion pathways, is expected to enhance the electrochemical performance (Ahmad et al., 2015). Reddy et al. found that ball-milled fluorinated graphite exhibited significantly improved discharge plateau, power density, and energy density, attributing it to the reduction of particle size during milling, which facilitates Li+ diffusion. By controlling the fluorination process, fluorinated carbon nanotubes were prepared from multi-walled carbon nanotubes, where the inner non-fluorinated graphite layer maintains electron conductivity while the outer fluorinated layer preserves electroactivity during discharge, thus meeting the requirements for higher energy and higher power electrode materials simultaneously (Li et al., 2019). Fluorinated graphite nanosheets with remarkable electrochemical characteristics were precisely synthesized by Yang et al. (2021) using a novel technique that more semi-ionic C–F bonds are introduced at the edge of the graphite nanosheet, thereby enhancing their rate performance. Hence, nanocarbon materials represent a fine choice as a carbon source due to their splendid electrical conductivity and thermodynamic stability.
In recent years, beyond its application in Li/CFx primary batteries as the cathode material, various research groups have explored the utilization of CFx in other alkali-metal/CFx primary batteries, expanding the research scope of CFx. Among these, the electrochemical properties of CFx in sodium primary batteries (SPBs) and potassium primary batteries (PPBs) are anticipated to be comparable to that of Li/CFx primary batteries (LPBs), rendering them promising candidates for high-energy battery applications. Zhong et al. employed a fluorinated nanocarbon material as the cathode in K/CFx primary batteries, which exhibit stability in charge-discharge cycles but subpar electrochemical performance (Yue et al., 2021). On the other hand, Li et al. synthesized fluorocarbon nanotubes as the cathode in SPBs, demonstrating comparable capacity to Li/CFx primary batteries. However, owing to the low sodium potential of the standard electrode (Na+/Na, −2.71V vs. SHE) and significant ohmic polarization during the initial phase, SPBs were unable to discharge normally at high rates.
Synthesis of CFx materials with higher F/C ratios generally require higher fluorination temperatures, facilitating the formation of CF2/CF3 groups under these conditions. However, the CF2/CF3 groups show electrochemical inertness in the context of the Li/Li+ reaction within the voltage range of 1–3.3 V, leading in extremely low electrical conductivity, which limits their use in ultra-high power density equipment (Leifer et al., 2009). Here, a fluorinated carbon nanomaterial (referred to as FNC) has been developed using aggregated nanocarbon (ANC) as the carbon source and using an improved low temperature fluorination process (≤400°C). By adjusting the fluorination process to control the degree of fluorination, FNC with high F/C ratios ranging from 0.8 ≤ x ≤ 1.05 have been prepared (FNC-x). The high F/C ratio in FNC also contains abundant semi-ionic C–F bonds, which was demonstrated to advance electric conductivity and reducing ohmic polarization during initial discharge, and the discharge voltage is further increased. The advantage of high discharge voltage can improve the stacking process of FNC in practical applications and is suitable for more scenarios. FNC-1.0 exhibits maximum energy density of 2,144 Wh kg–1, and it keeps up an energy density of 1,250 Wh kg–1 at 20C (1C = 860 mA g−1). In addition, FNC also shows excellent electrochemical performance when employed as cathode for Na and K alkali-metals batteries.
2 Experimental
2.1 Material synthesis
Nanocarbon was acquired straight from shanghai naiou nano technology Co., Ltd. This kind of nanocarbon is characterized by high compact density, suitable surface area, and readily bonds with F atoms. The following is the synthetic procedure of FNC: a suitable volume of nanocarbon powder was added to a Ni reactor, and fluorination was performed using a NF3 gas at a specific pressure and temperature range, divided into four temperature (300, 330, 360°C and 400°C) and pressure (0.15, 0.20, 0.25,0.30 MPa) intervals for the fluorination reaction. The reaction time was at least 3 h to ensure complete reaction. The F/C ratio of the fluorination product increased as the temperature and pressure during fluorination increased, resulting in FNC-0.80, FNC-0.90, FNC-1.00, and FNC-1.05. Using the weighted method, the F/C ratio was computed using the following Equation 1. In the equation, Wc denotes the mass of the carbon source utilized in the experimental setup, ΔW represents the differential variation in the mass of the carbon source, specifically measured before and subsequent to the process of fluoridation.
2.2 Materials characterization
Field Emission Transmission Electron Microscopy (FETEM, JEOL JEM-F200) and Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM, Apreo S LoVac, Thermo Corporation) were used to investigate the morphology and microstructure of materials. An X-ray diffractometer (Miniflex 600, Rigaku) equipped with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å, 15 mA, and 40 kV) was used to analyze the crystal structure of the FNC. Chemical bonding investigations were conducted via Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (Nicolet iS 50, Thermo Corporation), a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha analyzer with a monochromated Al Kα source was used for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) study, while a LabRAM HR Evolution (Horiba) with laser wavelengths of 325 and 532 nm, and a wavenumber range of 200–3,000 cm–1, was used for Raman spectroscopy. Before using an Autosorb-iQ2-MP gas adsorption equipment to record N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms, the FNC underwent degassing at a temperature of 150°C, with the process continuing until a pressure of 2 mmHg (267 Pa) was attained. To quantify its specific surface area, the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) methodology was employed.
2.3 Electrochemical test
The electrochemical testing was performed through a constant current discharge process. For the cathode electrode fabrication, a slurry mixture consisting of FNC (80 wt.%), carboxymethyl cellulose sodium (10 wt.%), and acetylene black (10 wt.%) was prepared, utilizing deionized water as the solvent. After that, this slurry was spread over aluminum foil. Subsequently, the electrode was dried in a vacuum oven at 90°C for a duration of 12 h in order to remove residual solvents, followed by cutting into 14 mm disks, achieving an active material loading of 1.25 mg cm–2.
An evaluation of the electrochemical performance was conducted by assembling a coin cell. Lithium metal was used to create coin cells (CR2016) as the anode material, and 1.0 M LiFSI in propylene dimethoxyethane (DME) and propylene carbonate (PC) (1:1 vol) acting as the electrolyte, alongside Celgard 2500 as the separator. Coin cells (CR2025) were fabricated utilizing sodium and potassium metal as the anode material, with 1.0 M NaPF6 in PC and ethylene carbonate (EC) (1:1 vol), and 1.0 M KPF6 in ethylene EC and diethyl carbonate (DEC) (1:1 vol), functioning as the electrolyte. Glass microfiber filters were employed as the separator. Assembly occurred within an argon-filled glovebox (H2O < 0.01 ppm, O2 < 0.01 ppm). Discharge tests were conducted at 25°C utilizing the MIHW-200-160CH (Shenzhen Neware Electronics Co., China) battery testing system, with a cutoff voltage set at 1.5 V.
The cell was discharged at a rate of 1C for 1 min using the galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT), and then it was allowed to relax for 120 min. In the sections that follow, the parameters pertaining to the CFx electrode’s Li+ diffusion coefficient are presented.
EIS measurements were conducted utilizing a CHI760E electrochemical workstation (Chenhua Instrument Co., China), with a frequency span from 1 MHz to 0.01 Hz, with an amplitude set at 5 mV.
3 Results and discussions
3.1 Morphological and structural characterization
Figure 1 depicts the process for preparing FNC, commencing with the introduction of ANC into the reactor, followed by the infusion of NF3 for thorough reaction., and the synthesis of FNC with varying F/C ratios was achieved by adjusting the temperature and pressure conditions.
As depicted in Figures 2A, B, numerous spherical nano-carbon particles aggregate to form ANC with sizes ranging from 2 to 5 μm. The aggregate nanocarbon particles exhibit a honeycomb-like structure characterized by a considerable amount of loosely packed voids, which offers unique advantages in terms of physical and chemical properties. Primary ANC particles have a particle size of around 30 nm, according to the TEM picture (Figure 2C), with high disorder observed in the high-resolution view (Figure 2D). Similarly, FNC preserves the original morphology, particle sized and crystalline structure of ANC (Figures 2E–H). The preservation of the inherent structural integrity is crucial, as it facilitates the efficient transport of Li+ through the inner of material. Furthermore, the maintenance of the crystalline structure ensures optimal interfacial contact between the F-Li, thereby enhancing the electrochemical performance through improved charge transfer kinetics and effective utilization of active sites. Furthermore, the homogeneous distribution of fluorine and carbon is plainly visible on the FNC-1.0’s high-angle annular dark-field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM) (Figure 2I). According to the aforementioned findings, the original morphology of ANC was not damaged during fluorination process.
Figure 2. Morphology of ANC and FNC-1.0. SEM images of (A, B) ANC, (E, F) FNC-1.0. TEM images of (C, D) ANC, (G, H) FNC-1.0. (I) HAADF-STEM image and elemental mapping images of FNC-1.0, elemental distribution of C and F.
Figure 3A portrays the XRD patterns of raw ANC and FNC materials. The interlayer (002) and (100) reflections cause the ANC material to show notable broad diffraction peaks at 24° and 44°, indicating of a disordered carbon structure. The reflection line in FNC around 13° is the (001) reflection of a high-level fluorinated graphene system, but the markedly reduced intensity and the dramatically broadened width indicate the loss of interlayer correlations between fluorinated carbon sheets (Peng et al., 2019). During fluorination, the peaks associated with the (001) crystal plane exhibit a shift towards a lower angle. This peak shift serves as an indicator of the progressive fluorination depth, manifesting in a gradual enlargement of the interplanar spacing. Concurrently, a reduction in the peak half-width is observed, suggesting a weakening of the interlayer interactions between the FNC layers (Sun et al., 2014). Utilizing the Bragg equation, the calculated interlayer spacings for FNC-0.80, FNC-0.90, FNC-1.00, and FNC-1.05 were determined to be 0.693, 0.703, 0.714, and 0.736 nm, respectively.
Figure 3. (A) XRD patterns of ANC and FNC. (B) The Raman spectra of ANC and FNC. (C) FTIR spectra of ANC and FNC. (D–G) Comparative XPS C 1s spectra of FNC-0.80, FNC-0.90, FNC-1.00, FNC-1.05.
The Raman spectrum of ANC (Figure 3B) exhibits two characteristic bands: a defect-induced D band centered at 1,319 cm–1 and a crystalline graphite G band centered at 1,603 cm–1, indicating the presence of an amorphous structure in ANC (Xu and Buehler, 2009; Rajagopal et al., 2017). The fluorinated FNC possesses pronounced fluorescence capabilities, while the Raman spectrum reveals an absence of distinct Raman bands (Yue et al., 2021). Under the influence of fluorescence, Figure 3B reveals two relatively weak characteristic peaks. Firstly, the peak at 1,323 cm–1 corresponds to the D band of carbon materials, the peak at 1,591 cm–1 corresponds to the G band, with its shift attributed to the shortened C–C bond lengths.
The chemical composition of ANC and FNC was analyzed using FTIR spectroscopy, as depicted in Figure 3C, to elucidate their respective characteristics. The FTIR spectrum of ANC indicates a lack of active functional groups, with the spectrum showing minimal distinctive features. The utilization of FTIR characterization techniques enabled the investigation of the chemical bonds present in FNC. FTIR characterization was utilized to investigate the chemical bonds of FNC. The detection peaks at 1,341 and 1,222 cm–1 signifies the stretching vibration of–CF2/CF3 groups and covalent C–F bonds, respectively. Furthermore, FNC-0.80, FNC-0.90, and FNC-1.00 consistently exhibit a characteristic peak at 1,160 cm–1, which corresponds to the stretching vibration of the semi-ionic C–F bond. This observation provides substantial evidence for the notable concentration of C–F semi-ionic bonds within these materials (Sun et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2003; Guérin et al., 2004).
For the purpose of evaluating the pore structure and quantifying the specific surface area (SSA) of the samples, nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms were analyzed at a temperature of 77 K. The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm analysis of ANC and FNC, as depicted in Supplementary Figure S1A, reveals a type II profile without a discernible hysteresis loop throughout the curve, suggesting a non-microporous nature of the materials. The micropore volume of ANC and FNC is very small (Supplementary Table S1), drawing from density functional theory (DFT) calculations, the cumulative pore volumes of micropores for FNC-0.80, FNC-0.90, FNC-1.0, and FNC-1.05 are 0.042, 0.044, 0.035, and 0.032 m3 g–1, respectively. This further confirms that FNC are non-microporous nanoscale carbon. With the continuous increase in fluorination temperature, the SSA of the corresponding synthesized FNC gradually decreases, which is attributed to the destruction of the FNC structure during the fluorination process. Furthermore, the pore size distribution graph (Supplementary Figure S1B) of ANC and FNC reveals the absence of pores, affirming the non-porous nature of the material.
Additionally, the surface composition of FNC was ascertained by assessing the cumulative intensity of characteristic lines within the XPS spectrum (Supplementary Figure S2). The high-intensity F signal confirmed the successful fluorination of ANC. In alignment with the FTIR analysis findings, the high-resolution C 1s spectra of FNC (Figures 3D–G) validated the existence of carbon-based components with varying compositions and configurations. The deconvoluting of the high-resolution C 1s spectra for the four samples disclosed distinct peaks, with assignments at 284.78, 287.12, 289.11, 290.4, 291.74, and 292.7 eV corresponding to sp2 C=C, sp3 C–C, semi-ionic C–F bonds, covalent C–F bonds, –CF2, and–CF3 bonds, respectively (Sun et al., 2014; Robinson et al., 2010; Nair et al., 2010). Upon a comparative analysis of the data, it becomes evident that a substantial fraction of carbon atoms is covalently bonded to fluorine atoms through sp3 hybridization. The comprehensive results pertaining to each carbon component are tabulated in Supplementary Table S2. Moreover, quantitative analysis of the high-resolution spectra of F 1s for FNC was performed, and the results are presented in Supplementary Figures S3A–D. Correspondingly, the fittings at 687.35 eV, 688.70 eV, and 690.03 eV correspond to the covalent bonding of fluorine atoms with sp2-hybridized carbon atoms, sp3-hybridized carbon atoms, and perfluorinated functional groups formed with carbon, respectively. The detailed content and results of various fluorine compositions are provided in Supplementary Table S3. Additionally, the atomic ratio of F/C obtained through XPS analysis was found to be close to the F/C ratio obtained through gravimetric analysis. It is observed that with increasing F/C ratio, the presence of conjugated components in the FNC diminishes, the relative abundance of perfluorinated functional groups steadily increases.
3.2 Electrochemical performance
FNC was assembled as the cathode of a lithium metal primary battery in the form of a coin cell to test and characterize its electrochemical performance. The galvanostatic discharge profiles of FNC at 0.01C are shown in Figure 4A. The specific capacities of FNC-0.80, FNC-0.90, FNC-1.00, and FNC-1.05 are 722, 731, 765, and 798 mA h g–1, respectively. Based on the aforementioned data that nearly all C–F bonds participate actively in the discharge process. The corresponding Ragone plot and different rate energy density graph of the prepared FNC cathodes (Figures 4B, C) both demonstrate that FNC has excellent rate capability. Distinct from other nano scaled CFx materials, the FNC cathode exhibits superior rate capability and supports high-power output, which is attributed to its aggregated spherical structure, wherein loosely packed and dense voids provide more continuous diffusion pathways for Li+ transportation. At 20C, the FNC-1.00 exhibits a power density of 33,694 W kg–1 and an energy density of 1,250 Wh kg–1. The specific capacity is 578 mA h g–1 at 20C, corresponding to a 75.6% retention of the specific capacity at 0.01C.
Figure 4. (A) Galvanostatic discharge curves at 0.01C rate of FNC. (B) Ragone plot of prepared FNC cathodes. (C) Diagram of electrochemical performances of prepared FNC cathodes at different discharge rates. (D) Comparison of E1/2 of FNC with previously reported nano CFx cathodes. Note: Multiple batteries were simultaneously tested, and all results showed good repeatability.
The F/C ratio exhibited a negative correlation with the discharge voltage but a positive correlation with the specific capacity. Given the higher bond energies of–CF2 and–CF3 groups, which manifest their inert nature during the discharge process, perfluorinated groups do not contribute to the enhancement of the material’s capacity, but rather decrease the activity of FNC. An increase in the content of perfluorinated groups can exacerbate ohmic polarization and reduce the discharge platform. In addition, high F/C ratio diminishes electrical conductivity, heightens ohmic polarization and lowers discharge voltage (Zhang et al., 2010; Dubois et al., 2012). Consequently, all reported CFx products demonstrate distinct voltage delays following discharge. It is observed that the ohmic polarization effect of FNC is relatively weak in the initial discharge stage, and there is no significant voltage delays, contrasting with other CFx materials (Supplementary Figure S4) (Watanabe, 1980). In the case of FNC-1.05 with a higher F/C ratio, there is almost no voltage delay phenomenon observed at low discharge rates (<0.5C). As the discharge rate increases (>1C), minor voltage delays emerge in FNC with varying F/C ratios. Even the discharge rate is escalated to 20C, FNC does not exhibit a more severe voltage delay. In addition, the high F/C ratio of FNC presents a higher discharge plateau. The median voltage of the FNC was compared against the discharge median voltages (E1/2) for all reported nanoscale CFx materials (Figure 4D, and detailed information presented in Supplementary Table S4), where in FNC demonstrates a higher discharge voltage (Jiang et al., 2021; Ahmad et al., 2015; Li et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2023; Li et al., 2021; Peng et al., 2023; Ahmad et al., 2017; Hou et al., 2022). The E1/2 of FNC are at 3.20, 3.21, 3.13, and 2.88 V (vs Li+/Li) at 0.01C, which are significantly higher than that of commercial FG (2.71 V vs Li+/Li) (Chen N. G et al., 2023). FNC-1.0, characterized by a high F/C ratio, and demonstrates a high E1/2 of 3.13 V. This phenomenon is attributed to the higher content of semi-ionic C–F bonds in FNC, thereby enhancing the electrochemical activity and conductivity of the material.
To further validate the rate capability of FNC, the diffusion efficiency of Li+ was analyzed using GITT, and the Li+ diffusion coefficient (DLi+) was utilized as an assessment metric (Figure 5A). If the applied current is extremely low and the relaxation time is exceedingly brief, the following equation can be used to calculate the DLi+(Deiss, 2005):
Figure 5. (A) Galvanostatic intermittent titration curves of FNC (GITT), (B) Li+ diffusion coefficient estimated by GITT. (C) Rb variations of FNC under different DOD. (D) Rct variations of FNC under different DOD. (E–H) Impedance intensity map based on DRT under different DOD.
The chemical diffusion coefficient of the mobile species, denoted as DLi+ (cm2 s–1), is determined by considering multiple parameters. These include the applied current I0(A), the molar volume Vm (cm3 mol–1), and the thickness L (cm) of the electrode material. Additionally, the Faraday constant F, the total contact area S (cm2) between the electrolyte and electrode, and the number of charge transfer Zi in the discharge reaction of FNC are also taken into account for the precise calculation of DLi+. Utilizing the Equation 2, the DLi+ was calculated, and Figure 5B demonstrates the gradual variation of DLi+ values during the discharge process. In the initial stage of discharge, the DLi+ value gradually increases due to the generation of carbon from the discharge of CFx. As the voltage ranges from 3.0 V to 1.5 V, the particle surface progressively becomes saturated with LiF, impeding ion transport, as reflected in the gentle increase trend of DLi+ values. Overall, compared to traditional CFx materials, FNC possesses a plethora of highly active semi-ionic C–F bonds, which demonstrate higher DLi+ throughout the entire discharge process, effectively mitigating the voltage delay caused by ohmic polarization. This characteristic contributes to its excellent rate capability. It is noteworthy that the DLi+ value of FNC-1.00 in the 2.5 V–1.5 V range is higher than that of FNC-1.05. These results demonstrate that the average DLi+ value of FNC-1.00 at 1C is higher than that of FNC-1.05, confirms its superior power performance.
The underline mechanism of the excellent electrochemical performance of FNC materials was further analyzed and discussed. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was recorded for FNC electrode (Supplementary Figure S5A–D) at different depths of discharge (DOD) at 0.1C (cut-off 1.5 V). The Nyquist plot of the FNC cathode exhibits an approximate semicircular feature in the high-frequency region and a slanted line feature in the low-frequency region. This semicircle represents the charge transfer process, and as the discharge depth increases, the decrease in the radius of the semicircle indicates a reduction in the charge transfer resistance (Zhang et al., 2009b; Jiang et al., 2017). Based on the analysis of the equivalent circuit model depicted in the inset of Figure 5C, Rb signifies the ohmic resistance, while Rct denotes the charge transfer resistance, Zw represents the Warburg impedance, and CPE stands for the double-layer capacitance (Zhang et al., 2009a; Qian et al., 2022). The Rb and Rct significantly impact the discharge performance of the battery. For materials with a high F/C ratio, the high content of–CF2/–CF3 groups within the material, which are considered inert fluorine-containing groups, significantly impedes charge transfer (Zhong et al., 2018). These groups, due to their nonconductive nature, impede the transfer of electrons, thereby manifesting a greater charge transfer resistance. Consequently, CFx materials with a high F/C ratio exhibit a higher interfacial transfer impedance. With the increase in discharge depth, the resistance Rb of FNC gradually decreases after fitting (Figure 5C), attributed to the enhanced conductivity resulting from carbon formation during the reaction. As the discharge progresses, the Rct of FNC remains relatively stable with minimal variation (Figure 5D). However, compared to the initial stage of discharge, the Rct decreases as the reaction proceeds. This trend aligns with previous studies on CFx material (Chen P. et al., 2023). At 100% DOD, Rct does not rise sharply, which also confirms that CFx material can continue to react at 1.5 V.
To further validate the aforementioned analysis of the discharge mechanism of FNC, the distribution of relaxation time (DRT) was employed to analyze the EIS impedance across various DOD and timescales (Figures 5E–H, Initiating the DRT diagnosis process involves the utilization of EIS measurement across a wide frequency spectrum) (Rashid and Gupta, 2015). Initially, it is observed that the relaxation time constant τ exhibits minimal impedance response within the interval of (−5 ≤ Logτ ≤ −1), suggesting the absence of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation throughout the discharge process of FNC, thereby excluding consideration of Rsei. The relaxation time constant τ falls within the interval of (0 ≤ Logτ ≤2), indicating the charge transfer process. It manifests a pronounced impedance signal during the initial discharge stage, gradually diminishing as the discharge deepens, aligning with the aforementioned analysis findings. Overall, owing to the ultra-low conductivity of CFx material, the charge transfer impedance is predominantly influenced by conductivity.
Subsequently, we fabricated new SPBs employing the FNC as cathode material. Equation 3, proposed by Liu et al., represents the discharge mechanism of SPBs, which is similar to that of Li/CFx primary batteries (Liu et al., 2014):
Notably, the discharge voltage of FNC exhibits a notable reduction of approximately 250 mV in SPBs compared to LPBs. This discrepancy is attributed to the difference in the standard electrode potentials between lithium (Li+/Li, −3.02 V vs. SHE) and sodium (Na+/Na, −2.71 V vs. SHE). Moreover, compared to LPBs, SPBs exhibit less prominent rate capability, which is likely attributed to the larger ionic radius of Na+ (1.02 Å) compared to Li+ (0.76 Å), which results in more difficult transport of Na+(Li et al., 2019). Although limited by the characteristics of SPBs, FNC retains a high discharge voltage and exhibits excellent electrochemical performance, as illustrated in Figures 6A, C. Equation 4, proposed by Zhong et al., represents the discharge mechanism of PPBs, which is similar to that of the LPBs and SPBs batteries (Yue et al., 2021):
Figure 6. (A, B) Galvanostatic discharge curves of various FNC at 0.01C rate in SPBs and PPBs. (C, D) Diagram of energy density of the prepared FNC cathodes at different discharge rates in SPBs and PPBs. Note: Multiple batteries were simultaneously tested, and all results showed good repeatability.
As a cathode material, FNC exhibits excellent electrochemical properties in PPBs (relevant data are shown in Figures 6B, D; Supplementary Table S4). This performance can be attributed to the high standard electrode potential of potassium (K+/K, −2.93 V vs. SHE). In PPBs, FNC demonstrates high discharge voltage and excellent rate capability, with maximum capacity and energy density levels approaching those of LPBs. At a rate of 20C, it maintains sufficient stability for discharge, achieving energy density and power density of 738 Wh kg–1 and 22,363 W kg–1, respectively. The phenomenon indicates that FNC in various alkali-metal/CFx primary batteries does not exhibit a significant voltage lag phenomenon during the initial discharge. When the discharge rate is increased to 10C or higher, stable discharge is achieved with a discharge voltage exceeding 1.5 V. This can be attributed to the favorable conductivity of FNC, which mitigates the influence of ohmic polarization. Overall, the high discharge voltage and small ohmic polarization associated with FNC enable an outstanding cathode material for alkali-metal/CFx primary batteries. In comparison with other reported fluorinated nanocarbon materials, FNC represents the first instance of utilization in distinct alkali-metal primary batteries, demonstrating stable discharge even at high discharge rates.
The evolution of the electrode’s structural characteristics is likewise crucial. A comparative analysis of SEM imagery prior to and post discharge of the FNC-1.0 cathode before and after discharge at 0.01C in LPBs (Supplementary Figures S6A, B) reveals a large number of small particles uniformly covering the converted FNC surface. In the previously conducted studies, similar morphological characteristics were observed on the CFx cathode after the discharge was completed, which is attributed to the contribution of small LiF crystals (Peng et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2023). In SPBs and PPBs, dense NaF and KF are also considered to generate in the FNC surface after discharge, and the morphology of the electrodes did not change much before and after discharge. Overall, the morphology of FNC is well maintained during discharge, in alignment with previous report (Cai et al., 2023).
4 Conclusion
In summary, we have proposed a chemical pathway for synthesizing FNC that possesses exceptional electrochemical properties, using high surface area aggerated nanocarbon materials as precursor. The FNC synthesized via fluoridation maintains the original morphology of ANC with large surface area and short Li+ pathway and exhibits high electric conductivity, effectively mitigating the voltage lag caused by ohmic polarization during the initial stage. With a substantial content of semi-ionic C–F bonds, FNC demonstrates exceptional rate capability. As a result, FNC-1.0 with a high F/C ratio (x = 1) maintains a high discharge voltage of 3.13 V, rendering it application in various scenarios. Moreover, the FNC-1.0 exhibits a specific capacity of 578 mA h g–1 and a capacity retention rate of 75.6% at a magnification of 20C. Furthermore, it boasts an energy density of 1,250 Wh kg–1 and a power density of 33,694 W kg–1. The FNC could also be extended to SPBs and PPBs, further demonstrating its suitability for alkali-metal primary batteries. The unique designed FNC exhibiting high discharge voltage and outstanding rate capability, possesses significant potential for supplanting commercial fluorinated graphite in the prospective CFx market.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
HC: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Writing–original draft, Resources. KY: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Validation, Writing–review and editing. YZ: Software, Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing–review and editing. QX: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Writing–review and editing. XK: Investigation, Writing–review and editing, Formal Analysis. HY: Funding acquisition, Conceptualization, Writing–review and editing. DC: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing–review and editing, Conceptualization, Resources.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was financially supported by Fujian Science and Technology Planning Projects of China (Nos. 2023H0045 and 2022T3067), the Self-deployment Project Research Programs of Haixi Institutes, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. CXZX-2022-JQ12), XIREM autonomously deployment project (No. 2023GG02).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2024.1484668/full#supplementary-material
References
Ahmad, Y., Dubois, M., Guerin, K., Hamwi, A., and Flahaut, E. (2017). High energy density of primary lithium batteries working with sub-fluorinated few walled carbon nanotubes cathode. J. Alloys Compd. 726, 852–859. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.001
Ahmad, Y., Dubois, M., Guérin, K., Hamwi, A., and Zhang, W. (2015). Pushing the theoretical limit of Li–CFx batteries using fluorinated nanostructured carbon nanodiscs. Carbon 94, 1061–1070. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.073
Cai, S., Meng, W., Tian, H., Luo, T., Wang, L., Li, M., et al. (2023). Artificial porous heterogeneous interface for all-solid-state sodium ion battery. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 632, 179–185. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2022.11.037
Chen, N. G., Zhang, G. J., Chen, H. X., and Yue, H. J. (2023). Conductive carbon-wrapped fluorinated hard carbon composite as high-performance cathode for primary lithium batteries. Coatings 13, 812. doi:10.3390/coatings13050812
Chen, P., Liu, W., Wang, H., Jiang, Y., Niu, X., and Wang, L. (2023). Semi-Ionic C-F bond enabling fluorinated carbons rechargeable as Li-ion batteries cathodes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 649, 255–263. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2023.06.108
Deiss, E. (2005). Spurious chemical diffusion coefficients of Li+ in electrode materials evaluated with GITT. Electrochimica Acta 50, 2927–2932. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2004.11.042
Dubois, M., Guérin, K., Zhang, W., Ahmad, Y., Hamwi, A., Fawal, Z., et al. (2012). Tuning the discharge potential of fluorinated carbon used as electrode in primary lithium battery. Electrochimica Acta 59, 485–491. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2011.11.015
Guérin, K., Dubois, M., Houdayer, A., and Hamwi, A. (2012). Applicative performances of fluorinated carbons through fluorination routes: a review. J. Fluor. Chem. 134, 11–17. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2011.06.013
Guérin, K., Pinheiro, J., Dubois, M., Fawal, Z., Masin, F., Yazami, R., et al. (2004). Synthesis and characterization of highly fluorinated graphite containing sp2 and sp3 carbon. Chem. Mater. 16, 1786–1792. doi:10.1021/cm034974c
Hou, J., Yang, X., Fu, X., Zou, D., Ma, J., Peng, Y., et al. (2022). Highly oriented fluorinated carbon nanotube arrays for high specific capacity lithium primary battery. J. Alloys Compd. 923, 166452. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166452
Hu, Y. H., Kong, L. C., Li, W. Y., Sun, L. D., Peng, C., Qin, M., et al. (2023). Fluorinated microporous carbon spheres for Li/CFx batteries with high volumetric energy density. Compos. Commun. 40, 101607. doi:10.1016/j.coco.2023.101607
Jayasinghe, R., Thapa, A. K., Dharmasena, R. R., Nguyen, T. Q., Pradhan, B. K., Paudel, H. S., et al. (2014). Optimization of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube based CF electrodes for improved primary and secondary battery performances. J. Power Sources 253, 404–411. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.076
Jiang, H. R., Shyy, W., Wu, M. C., Wei, L., and Zhao, T. S. (2017). Highly active, bi-functional and metal-free B 4 C-nanoparticle-modified graphite felt electrodes for vanadium redox flow batteries. J. Power Sources 365, 34–42. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.075
Jiang, S. B., Huang, P., Lu, J. C., and Liu, Z. C. (2021). The electrochemical performance of fluorinated ketjenblack as a cathode for lithium/fluorinated carbon batteries. RSC Adv. 11, 25461–25470. doi:10.1039/d1ra03873g
Jones, J. P., Smart, M. C., Krause, F. C., West, W. C., and Brandon, E. J. (2022). Batteries for robotic spacecraft. Joule 6, 923–928. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.04.004
Lee, Y. S., Cho, T. H., Lee, B. K., Rho, J. S., An, K. H., and Lee, Y. H. (2003). Surface properties of fluorinated single-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Fluor. Chem. 120, 99–104. doi:10.1016/s0022-1139(02)00316-0
Leifer, N., Johnson, V., Ben-Ari, R., Gan, H., Lehnes, J., Guo, R., et al. (2009). Solid-state NMR studies of chemically lithiated CFx. J. Electrochem. Soc. 157, A148. doi:10.1149/1.3267042
Li, X., Zhang, H., Liu, C., Qiao, J., and Zhou, X. (2021). A MOF-derived multifunctional nano-porous fluorinated carbon for high performance lithium/fluorinated carbon primary batteries. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 310, 110650. doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110650
Li, Y., Wu, X., Liu, C., Wang, S., Zhou, P., Zhou, T., et al. (2019). Fluorinated multi-walled carbon nanotubes as cathode materials of lithium and sodium primary batteries: effect of graphitization of carbon nanotubes. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 7128–7137. doi:10.1039/c8ta12074a
Liu, W., Li, H., Xie, J.-Y., and Fu, Z.-W. (2014). Rechargeable room-temperature CFx-sodium battery. ACS Appl. Mater. and Interfaces 6, 2209–2212. doi:10.1021/am4051348
Liu, Y., Zhang, H., Wu, B., Ma, J., Zhou, G., Mahmood, N., et al. (2023). Pushing capacities and energy densities beyond theoretical limits of lithium primary batteries using active CFx nanocapsules with x > 1. Inorg. Chem. Front. 10, 127–136. doi:10.1039/d2qi02027k
Lu, Y., Ru, S., Li, H., Wang, G., and Xu, S. (2023). Laser-structured microarray electrodes for durable stretchable lithium-ion battery. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 631, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2022.11.024
Nair, R. R., Ren, W., Jalil, R., Riaz, I., Kravets, V. G., Britnell, L., et al. (2010). Fluorographene: a two-dimensional counterpart of teflon. Small 6, 2877–2884. doi:10.1002/smll.201001555
Peng, C., Li, Y., Yao, F., Fu, H., Zhou, R., Feng, Y., et al. (2019). Ultrahigh-energy-density fluorinated calcinated macadamia nut shell cathodes for lithium/fluorinated carbon batteries. Carbon 153, 783–791. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2019.07.065
Peng, C., Zhang, S., Kong, L., Xu, H., Li, Y., and Feng, W. (2023). Fluorinated carbon nanohorns as cathode materials for ultra-high power Li/CFx batteries. Small Methods 8, 2301090. doi:10.1002/smtd.202301090
Qian, M., Tang, Y., Liu, L., Gao, Y., and Li, X. (2022). Well-dispersed Li2CoTi3O8 nanoparticles as a multifunctional material for lithium-ion batteries and lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 896, 162926. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162926
Rajagopal, R. R., Rajarao, R., and Sahajwalla, V. (2017). Synthesis of glass fiber-nano silicon carbide composite by using waste printed circuit boards and compact discs as resources. Compos. Commun. 5, 19–22. doi:10.1016/j.coco.2017.05.002
Ramachandran, T., Hamed, F., Raji, R. K., Majhi, S. M., Barik, D., Kumar, Y. A., et al. (2023). Enhancing asymmetric supercapacitor performance with NiCo2O4–NiO hybrid electrode fabrication. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 180, 111467. doi:10.1016/j.jpcs.2023.111467
Ramachandran, T., Mourad, A. H. I., Raji, R. K., Krishnapriya, R., Cherupurakal, N., Subhan, A., et al. (2022). KOH mediated hydrothermally synthesized hexagonal-CoMn2O4 for energy storage supercapacitor applications. Int. J. Energy Res. 46, 16823–16838. doi:10.1002/er.8350
Rashid, M., and Gupta, A. (2015). Effect of relaxation periods over cycling performance of a Li-ion battery. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A3145–A3153. doi:10.1149/2.0201502jes
Robinson, J. T., Burgess, J. S., Junkermeier, C. E., Badescu, S. C., Reinecke, T. L., Perkins, F. K., et al. (2010). Properties of fluorinated graphene films. Nano Lett. 10, 3001–3005. doi:10.1021/nl101437p
Sato, Y., Itoh, K., Hagiwara, R., Fukunaga, T., and Ito, Y. (2004). On the so-called “semi-ionic” C–F bond character in fluorine–GIC. Carbon 42, 3243–3249. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2004.08.012
Sharma, N., Dubois, M., Guérin, K., Pischedda, V., and Radescu, S. (2021). Fluorinated (Nano)Carbons: CFx electrodes and CFx-based batteries. Energy Technol. 9, 2000605. doi:10.1002/ente.202000605
Sun, C. B., Feng, Y. Y., Li, Y., Qin, C. Q., Zhang, Q. Q., and Feng, W. (2014). Solvothermally exfoliated fluorographene for high-performance lithium primary batteries. Nanoscale 6, 2634–2641. doi:10.1039/c3nr04609e
Wang, D., Jia, X., Tian, R., Yang, J., Su, Y., and Song, H. (2024). Tuning fluorine content of fluorinated graphene by an ionothermal synthesis method for achieving excellent tribological behaviors. Carbon 218, 118649. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2023.118649
Watanabe, N. (1980). Two types of graphite fluorides, (CF)n and (C2F)n, and discharge characteristics and mechanisms of electrodes of (CF)n and (C2F)n in lithium batteries. Solid State Ionics 1, 87–110. doi:10.1016/0167-2738(80)90025-9
Xu, Z., and Buehler, M. J. (2009). Strain controlled thermomutability of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology 20, 185701. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/20/18/185701
Yang, X. X., Zhang, G. J., Bai, B. S., Li, Y., Li, Y. X., Yang, Y., et al. (2021). Fluorinated graphite nanosheets for ultrahigh-capacity lithium primary batteries. Rare Met. 40, 1708–1718. doi:10.1007/s12598-020-01692-y
Yazami, R., Hamwi, A., Guérin, K., Ozawa, Y., Dubois, M., Giraudet, J., et al. (2007). Fluorinated carbon nanofibres for high energy and high power densities primary lithium batteries. Electrochem. Commun. 9, 1850–1855. doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2007.04.013
Yue, H., Chen, H., Zhao, C., Zheng, Z., Zhou, K., Zhang, Q., et al. (2021). Reversible potassium storage in ultrafine CF: a superior cathode material for potassium batteries and its mechanism. J. Energy Chem. 53, 347–353. doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2020.05.024
Zhang, Q., D’Astorg, S., Xiao, P., Zhang, X., and Lu, L. (2010). Carbon-coated fluorinated graphite for high energy and high power densities primary lithium batteries. J. Power Sources 195, 2914–2917. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.096
Zhang, S. S., Foster, D., and Read, J. (2009a). Carbothermal treatment for the improved discharge performance of primary Li/CFx battery. J. Power Sources 191, 648–652. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.02.007
Zhang, S. S., Foster, D., Wolfenstine, J., and Read, J. (2009b). Electrochemical characteristic and discharge mechanism of a primary Li/CFx cell. J. Power Sources 187, 233–237. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.10.076
Zhong, G., Chen, H., Huang, X., Yue, H., and Lu, C. (2018). High-power-density, high-energy-density fluorinated graphene for primary lithium batteries. Front. Chem. 6, 50. doi:10.3389/fchem.2018.00050
Zhu, C., Shen, X., Gao, Z., Li, Y., Wu, X., Zhao, J., et al. (2022). Enhancing electrochemical performance of fluorinated graphite by polydopamine−derived nitrogen−doped carbon coating. Electrochimica Acta 425, 140718. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2022.140718
Zhu, D., Yuan, J., Wang, T., Dai, Y., Peng, Y., Li, W., et al. (2022). A novel one-step method to prepare N, S Co-doped sub-fluorinated carbon electrode materials for ultrahigh-rate lithium-fluorinated carbon battery. J. Power Sources 551, 232188. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232188
Keywords: alkali-metal/CFx primary batteries, aggregated nanocarbon, semi-ionic C-F bonds, high discharge voltage, rate performance
Citation: Chen H, Yan K, Zou Y, Xia Q, Kang X, Yue H and Chen D (2024) Fluorinated aggregated nanocarbon with high discharge voltage as cathode materials for alkali-metal primary batteries. Front. Chem. 12:1484668. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2024.1484668
Received: 22 August 2024; Accepted: 20 September 2024;
Published: 02 October 2024.
Edited by:
Xiang Han, Nanjing Forestry University, ChinaReviewed by:
Ke Zhou, University of California, San Diego, United StatesTholkappiyan Ramachandran, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates
Yun Li, Microsoft, United States
Copyright © 2024 Chen, Yan, Zou, Xia, Kang, Yue and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hongjun Yue, hjyue@fjirsm.ac.cn; Ding Chen, chending@hnu.edu.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work