Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Chem., 01 February 2024
Sec. Electrochemistry
This article is part of the Research Topic Advanced Electrocatalytic Materials for Water Electrolysis and Fuel Cells View all 5 articles

Editorial: Advanced electrocatalytic materials for water electrolysis and fuel cells

  • 1Department of Materials Chemistry, National Institute of Chemistry, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • 2Department of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

Advancing clean, affordable, and renewable energy is one of the key challenges of the modern world. Hydrogen has been labeled as the next-generation energy carrier able to replace fossil fuels on a large scale (Bockris, 2013). Production and utilization of green hydrogen can be achieved in electrochemical devices, namely water electrolyzers and fuel cells. The cores of these devices are catalytic materials needed for the efficient running of the occurring electrochemical reactions. Therefore, tailoring more active, durable, and cost-effective electrocatalysts plays a crucial role in the pursuit of a sustainable energy cycle.

Water electrolysis is a carbon-neutral technology for hydrogen production and relies on two electrochemical reactions, namely hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Efficient electrocatalytic materials for both HER and OER are needed to make the overall energy demand for hydrogen generation as low as possible. Platinum group metals (PGMs), namely Pt and Ir, in the form of small-sized nanoparticles dispersed over high surface area supports, are state-of-the-art catalysts for HER and OER, respectively. Despite the superior performance, the usage of PGMs is hampered by their scarcity and high price; therefore, the design of catalysts based on more abundant materials is highly desirable. In this context, transition metal-based catalysts stand out due to their feasible activity combined with abundance and economic viability. Cobalt (Co) based materials are known for their ability to catalyze both water-splitting reactions. Ahmed et al. prepared a hydrated cobalt phosphate-based carbon-nanofiber-supported material (Co3(PO4)2.8H2O/CNFs) using a hydrothermal approach. The presence of water in the obtained material was confirmed using several characterization techniques. Co3(PO4)2 × 8H2O/CNFs catalyst revealed enhanced HER activity in acid media making a significant approach to the Pt/C benchmark (the Holy Grail of hydrogen electrocatalysis). In terms of stability, the Co3(PO4)2 × 8H2O/CNFs catalyst revealed 24 h of fully stable operation, as confirmed by both electrochemical investigations and structural characterization. This novel composite with a flower-like structure benefited from high electrochemical surface area, high conductivity, and high exposure of edge sites in phosphates due to the vertical growth of hydrated phosphates, which altogether was found to be crucial for designing active electrode material.

Photo-electrocatalysis utilizes light energy to drive electrochemical reactions onto the electrode surfaces. The synergy between light absorption and electrocatalysis holds promise for numerous applications, one of the most attractive being related to hydrogen production by solar-driven water electrolysis (Hota et al., 2023). Moreover, photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting offers a renewable and efficient way to store the excess of intermittent solar energy in the form of hydrogen. Consequently, the development of electrode materials for PEC water electrolysis is of particular importance. Aleksić et al. reported a composite material consisting of ZnO and RuO2 as a bifunctional PEC catalyst for water-splitting reactions operating in both alkaline and acid electrolytes. It was shown that the addition of a small amount of RuO2 to ZnO (1:10 M ratio) significantly increased the absorption properties of ZnO and improved its photoelectrocatalytic properties for HER and OER. This enhancement was ascribed to a combination of improved electron transfer due to the metallic conductivity of RuO2, reduced number of oxygen vacancies, and increased number of heterojunctions (i.e. increased number of active sites).

State-of-the-art electrocatalytic composites imply small-sized metallic nanoparticles dispersed over convenient support, which is expected to provide high specific surface area, conductivity, and durability. Smiljanić et al. provided a summary of the most recent advances in the development of support materials, labeling carbon and non-carbon-based supports as the two main directions in the field. Carbon materials are benchmark supports in electrocatalysis thanks to their high specific surface area and high conductivity. Compared to classical carbons, graphene and its derivatives offer higher surface area and conductivity, higher sp2 content, and fewer structural defects. Similar advantages are provided by carbon nanotubes and nanofibres, which benefit from their exceptional mechanical strength and tubular structure that facilitates mass transport. Andrić et al. reported a facile synthesis method to obtain CoPt alloy nanoparticles supported on different carbon-based materials, namely reduced graphene oxide, mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride, and Ketjen black. All three composites showed higher OER efficiency in alkaline media with respect to commercial CoPt/C catalysts, which was linked with enhanced charge transfer and effective utilization of the active sites during OER. CoPt/rGO composite exhibited the best catalytic OER activity with more than 10 times higher specific current densities compared to the CoPt/C analog. In terms of stability, CoPt nanoalloy supported on mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride showed superior properties, while (the most active) CoPt/rGO revealed quite unstable long-term operation. The observed durability issue needs to be addressed in future studies to make this material a suitable candidate for application as an OER catalyst, perhaps by doping with heteroatoms (such as B, N, P, and S) to improve the interaction between carbon supports and metallic nanoparticles. Furthermore, Smiljanić et al. labeled transition metal oxides (TMOs) as attractive alternatives for carbon in electrocatalysis due to excellent corrosion resistance and the possibility of inducing metal-support interaction (MSI). One of the most widely studied materials in this context is TiO2, which can be mixed with carbon to address its semiconducting nature. Alternatively, partial nitridation of TiO2 to form conductive TiON can be used to obtain advanced support for various electrocatalysts (Bele et al., 2019). Other TMOs with interesting properties include SnO2 and WO3; similarly, their semiconducting nature needs to be addressed for application in electrocatalysis. Transition metal nitrides and carbides, and 2D layered materials such as MXenes are also interesting as alternative supports in electrocatalysis.

Despite advancements made in the last couple of decades, there is still significant potential for breakthroughs in the field of electrocatalysis. For instance, the dependence of fuel cells and water electrolyzers on PGMs, particularly Pt and Ir, needs to be addressed to utilize these carbon-neutral technologies on a large scale. This can be achieved by optimizing PGM-based electrocatalysts (both active sites and integration of advanced supports) and developing methods for efficient recycling of these critical raw materials, or by tailoring non-PGM-based catalysts with comparable activity and durability.

Author contributions

MS: Conceptualization, Writing–original draft. BG: Conceptualization, Writing–original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. MS acknowledges the funding from the Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (program P2-0393). BG acknowledges the support from the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia (Contract No. 451-03-47/2023-01/200135).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Bele, M., Stojanovski, K., Jovanovič, P., Moriau, L., Koderman Podboršek, G., Moškon, J., et al. (2019). Towards stable and conductive titanium oxynitride high-surface-area support for iridium nanoparticles as oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalyst. ChemCatChem 11 (20), 5038–5044. doi:10.1002/cctc.201901487

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bockris, J. O. M. (2013). The hydrogen economy: its history. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 38 (6), 2579–2588. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hota, P., Das, A., and Maiti, D. K. (2023). A short review on generation of green fuel hydrogen through water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48 (2), 523–541. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.264

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: electrocatalysis, hydrogen energy, water electrolysis, fuel cells, advanced materials

Citation: Smiljanić M and Grgur B (2024) Editorial: Advanced electrocatalytic materials for water electrolysis and fuel cells. Front. Chem. 12:1373189. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2024.1373189

Received: 19 January 2024; Accepted: 26 January 2024;
Published: 01 February 2024.

Edited and reviewed by:

Nosang Vincent Myung, University of Notre Dame, United States

Copyright © 2024 Smiljanić and Grgur. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Milutin Smiljanić, milutin.smiljanic@ki.si; Branimir Grgur, bngrgur@tmf.bg.ac.rs

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.