Xiang Li
Cristina Giordano- Department of Chemistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
Electrochemical water splitting is one of the most promising and clean ways to produce hydrogen as a fuel. Herein, we present a facile and versatile strategy for synthesizing non-precious transition binary and ternary metal-based catalysts encapsulated in a graphitic carbon shell. NiMoC@C and NiFeMo2C@C were prepared via a simple sol-gel based method for application in the Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER). The conductive carbon layer surrounding the metals was introduced to improve electron transport throughout the catalyst structure. This multifunctional structure showed synergistic effects, possess a larger number of active sites and enhanced electrochemical durability. Structural analysis indicated that the metallic phases were encapsulated in the graphitic shell. Experimental results demonstrated that the optimal core-shell material NiFeMo2C@C exhibited the best catalytic performance for the OER in 0.5 M KOH, reaching a current density of 10 mA cm-2 at low overpotential of 292 mV for the OER, superior to the benchmark IrO2 nanoparticles. The good performances and stability of these OER electrocatalysts, alongside an easily scalable procedure makes these systems ideal for industrial purposes.
1 Introduction
The electrolysis of water, also known as “water splitting” (Scheme 1) is one of the most promising ways to generate clean and sustainable hydrogen-based energy and great efforts have been made to optimize H2 production by the corresponding Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (HER) half-reaction. However, one of the main problems restricting the overall process is the high energy barrier of the other half-reaction, namely, the Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER).
SCHEME 1. The two semi-reactions in the electrolysis of water.
To ensure an efficient water conversion, the overall process requires the use of suitable electrocatalysts (Pt for HER, and IrOx or RuOx for the OER are current benchmarks, due to their fast reaction kinetics and stability). Yet, the high cost and scarcity of the existing electrocatalysts cannot make their use a long lasting solution. In this respect, multiple classes of materials have been explored, including metal alloys (Jeong et al., 2019; An et al., 2022), oxides (Chen et al., 2022; Eum et al., 2022), hydroxides (Ni et al., 2017; Indra et al., 2022), phosphide (Lin et al., 2019), sulfide (Yan et al., 2021; Shaikh et al., 2022), selenide (Shaikh et al., 2022; Singh et al., 2022), nitrides (Defilippi et al., 2019) and carbides (Niether et al., 2018; Qin et al., 2018; Li et al., 2021) based on non-noble transition metals, i.e., Ni, Mo, Co, Fe and Mn (Kar et al., 2022).
Among these metals, Ni is considered an ideal choice thanks to its abundance, lower price, good conductivity and expected good activity towards the OER. Pure Ni, however, has a high overpotential, and can be (partially) oxidized during the electrochemical cycling, gradually losing its electrocatalytic activity and conductivity.
To improve its stability during electrocatalysis, the introduction of a second metal into the Ni structure has been considered. Beside stabilizing the final structure, the incorporation of a second metal can also enhance conductivity and, thanks to synergistic effects, improve activity. Binary nickel compounds including NiMo, NiFe, NiCu and NiCo (Jeong et al., 2019; Ahsan et al., 2020; Han et al., 2021; Li et al., 2022) have been tested for the OER. NiMo compounds show a promising activity, with a low overpotential of 190 mV at 10 mA cm-2 for the OER in alkaline media (Zu et al., 2019), making it one of the best performing catalysts that have been reported so far. In addition to an improved catalytic activity, the corrosion resistance of NiFeMo2C@C during the OER process was also enhanced. Nonetheless, despite the promising OER performance of bimetallic NiMo, currently no transition metal based catalysts can fully satisfy the requirements for large-scale commercial water splitting. The challenge to design electrocatalysts with high OER activity as well as long-term stability based on sustainable materials for industrial still remains.
To overcome the challenge, ternary catalysts were recently explored by introducing a third transition metal into the NiMo-based structure. According to theoretical studies, the synergistic effect resulting from the combination of the transition metals in the ternary catalysts should be able to modulate the electronic structures (Luo and Koper, 2022). By incorporating metal elements, the fnal electromic structure and catalytic performance can be turned (Medford et al., 2015; Zhang B and Voznyy, 2016; Ahsan et al., 2020). Therefore, ternary metal catalysts normally show superior electrocatalytic activity and stability compared to bimetallic materials. However, despite the enhanced performance, the synthesis of most ternary catalysts needs to go through a relatively complex synthetic routes, e.g., phosphorylation (Baek et al., 2019) and electrodeposition (Badrnezhad et al., 2021; Zhang P. et al., 2021), which would inevitably limit their use for large-scale applications. Thus, exploring simpler and safer, as well as more efficient ways to modify NiMo-based ternary catalysts remains a challenge.
In general, one of the challenges for the application of transition metal based nanoparticles in the OER process is the lack of long-term stability, mainly due to the agglomeration and corrosion of electrocatalysts during the OER process. A promising approach to overcome these issues is to armour the active core with a functional shell. Thus, core-shell structure of transition metals encapsulated within graphitic carbon shell could guarantee a high efficiency and a long-time operation (Tu et al., 2018). Graphitic carbon shell can improve activity, considering that the majority of the electroactive sites are located on the shells interface (Khani et al., 2019), and can also act as proton transport mediator, while the inner core metal acts as a conductive electron pathway (Baek et al., 2019), which overall enhances the conductivity of the whole system in the OER process. Controlling the composition of transition metal core can also alter the electronic properties of the carbon shells thanks to the core metals induced electronic effects, which enable to turn the binding energies of the OER intermediates and enhance the catalytic activities (Chen et al., 2015; Cui et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2017; Tu et al., 2018). The interactions between the metals in the core can also induce interatomic electron transfer, providing additional active catalytic sites (Sanad et al., 2021). The beneficial effect lead by the presence of the carbon phase was also nicely showed by Ahsan (Ahsan et al., 2020), who observed an improved oxidation resistance and a reduced agglomeration of the nanoparticles, alongside a better conductivity. However, few studies have been focusing on the structure of graphitic shell with ternary transition metals as a core.
In this paper, we presented a versatile and straightforward way to incorporate metals into Ni catalyst to prepare binary and ternary metal-based core-shell nanoparticles. Binary NiMoC@C and ternary NiFeMo2C@C core-shell nanoparticles were explored and optimised from both morphological and electronic structure point of view, to increase the density of active sites and optimizing the electron structure. For a better understanding of the mechanism, and the role of the metal centers, also the monometallic systems were tested for the OER, showing a much higher overpotential in alkaline media. The graphitic shell provided them with improved catalytic activity and stability comparing to the monometallic systems. Trimetallic NiFeMo2C@C showed an even lower overpotential (292 mV at 10 mA cm-2) in alkaline media due to synergistic effect, the formation of defects and extra active sites exposed in the graphitic shell.
2 Experimental procedure
2.1 Synthesis of nanomaterials
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and kept in a glove box filled with N2. The synthesis procedure employed is called urea-glass-route (Giordano et al., 2008; Giordano et al., 2009). A schematic representation of the nanoparticles’ synthesis is reported in Figure 1. A suitable amount of Ni and Mo metal salts were dissolved in ethanol (99%) to form a 1 M solution respectively, then a suitable amount of urea (98%) was added into the mixed metal solution to form a gel-like precursor (MU). In order to incorporate Fe, Fe solution mixed with urea was added in to NiMo precursor. Finally, a certain amount (5 wt.%) of Black Pearls 2000® (BP) was added as additional carbon source into the metal precursor. The precursor mixture was then transferred into a crucible and heat treated in a furnace up to 800°C under a N2 flow (99.9%). After cooling down, a dark powder was obtained, identified as NiMoC@C or NiFeMo2C@C nanoparticles. Experimental details are shown in Supplementary Table S1.
FIGURE 1. Schematic representation of the urea-glass route.
2.2 Physical and chemical characterization
XRD data was collected on a PANalytical CubiX3 X-ray powder diffractometer. The theta-2theta scan measurements were carried out in standard reflection mode, using Cu K alpha radiation, with samples holders spinning on the stage during the scan. Match software was used to analyse the crystallographic phases, and ICDD standard database used as reference. XPS measurements were performed on ThermoFisher Scientific Nexsa XPS. It has a monochromated, micro-focused, low-power Al K-Alpha X-ray source. Raman spectroscopy was performed using a Renishaw in Via instrument, equipped with a 660 nm laser. The spectra were obtained by performing 4 acquisitions with 30 s of exposure. The parameters of high-resolution spectrum for C 1s, Ni 2p, Mo3d, Fe 2p: 50 eV pass energy, 30 scans, 50 s dwell time. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed on a FEI inspect F instrument. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were taken using a Jeol’s JEM-F200 cold-FEG S/TEM with an operation voltage 200 kV.
2.3 Electrochemical test
The catalyst ink was prepared by grinding 2.5 mg of the powder catalyst and then adding 700 μl DIW, 280 ul ethanol (5 wt.% in lower aliphatic alcohols and 15%–20% water, Sigma Aldrich), 20 μl of Nafion® solution. The ink was ultrasonicated for 1 h and then drop-cast 5 μl on glassy carbon (3 mm diameter) electrode and allowed to dry at room temperature for 30 min in ambient air. OER measurements were conducted using a three-electrode cell set-up. The Autolab potentiostat was employed with an Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) as a reference electrode and platinum sheet as counter electrode. All the measurements were performed in O2-saturated 0.5 M KOH electrolyte at room temperature. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were performed in the range of −0.2–0.8 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) with a scan rate of 5 mV/s. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) were performed in the range of 0–1 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) with a scan rate of 5 mV/s. The polarization curves were iR corrected manually. Impedance measurements were performed in the frequency range from 100K Hz to 0.1 Hz. Stability measurement was conducted by chronopotentiometry at an applied current density of 10 mA/cm2. The potentials were converted to reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) scale by using the following formula: ERHE = E0Ag/AgCl + EAg/AgCl + (0.059 × pH). The loading of catalysts was 0.177 mg/cm2 without adding any extra conductive reagent in the ink.
3 Results and discussion
The as-prepared NiMoC@C and NiFeMo2C@C samples were characterised by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) to give information on crystallinity and phase composition. Figures 2A,B report the XRD patterns of the binary and ternary systems. The reference patterns (from the ICDD database) are also reported for comparison (full vertical lines).
FIGURE 2. XRD patterns of as-prepared NiMo- (A) and NiFeMo- (B) based samples. (C) Raman spectra of the NiMoC@C and NiFeMo2C@C. The reference patterns of MoC (ICDD: 04–013–9931), NiFe (ICDD: 04–008–8265), Mo2C (ICDD: 04–003–6378), Ni (ICDD: 04–001–0091) are reported as vertical full lines, for comparison. The peak marked with * and • are attributed to carbon (ICDD: 04-15-2407), and MoC, respectively.
From the pattern of the NiMo-based sample (Figure 2A), it can be observed that the bimetallic system is made of two phases, which were indexed as MoC (peaks at 31.7o, 35.9o and 48.6o, ICDD: 04–013–9931) and Ni° (peaks at 43.9o and 51.2o, ICDD: 04–001–0091). In both phases, the observed peaks are slightly shifted (to a lower angle), compared to those expected from the database, which indicated: 1) lattice expansion, in both cases, and 2) indirectly, an interaction between the two systems. The average crystallite sizes of Ni and MoC, estimated by the Scherrer equation, were approximately 64 nm and 28 nm, respectively. Surprisingly, no carbon phase is observed, although its presence was confirmed by HRTEM and Raman analysis (vide infra).
Interestingly, the incorporation of Fe, to form the ternary systems seems to have a drastic effect on the final composition. As shown in Figure 2B, the MoC phase is now hardly observed (see • marked peaks) for it is replaced by the corresponding semi-carbide (Mo2C, peaks at 34.5o, 38.1o, 39.5o, 52.3o, ICDD: 04–003–6378). In addition, the peak of graphitic carbon is observed (26°, ICDD 04-015-2407), possibly due to the catalytic effect of iron on the graphitisation of carbon (Chen C and Wang, 2018; Destyorini et al., 2021). For comparison, the XRD patterns of the monometallic and bimetallic systems are reported in Supplementary Figure S1. The XRD patterns of the pure Ni-, the pure Mo-and the pure Fe-based samples show the formation of pure Ni° (Supplementary Figure S1A), Mo2C (Supplementary Figure S1B) and Fe3C (Supplementary Figure S1C) phases, respectively, as expected when the urea-glass-route was used (Giordano et al., 2008; Giordano et al., 2010; Clavel et al., 2014). The pattern of NiFe-sample (Supplementary Figure S1D) shows the formation of a NiFe alloy (peaks at 43.9° and 51.1°, ICDD 04–008–8265). Although the pattern of pure Ni and NiFe alloy are very similar, we can reasonably attribute the pattern to NiFe (rather than Ni°), as no other peaks attributable to a Fe phase are observed (iron must be then in combination with nickel).
As expected, a carbon phase (peak at ∼26°) is only observed alongside the pure Ni- and Fe3C phases. Interestingly, the pure Mo-based sample is always leading to a pure Mo2C phase (peaks at 43.8° and 50.9°), and the formation of pure MoC was never observed in absence of Ni, indirectly confirming the interaction between the two metals in the bimetallic system. Raman spectroscopy was employed to investigate the graphitization degree (G-band) and structural defects (D-band) of catalysts (Figure 2C), as discussed later on.
The morphological properties of NiMoC@C and NiFeMo2C@C systems were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Figure 3 reports the EM images of NiMoC@C (Figures 3A–H) and NiFeMo2C@C (Figures 3I–P) samples. SEM images give a general overview of the systems’ homogeneity, while TEM images allow a closer look, showing diverse particles (darker contrast) loaded onto a “lighter” matrix (reasonably made of amorphous carbon). The darker spots, expected to be the metallic phases (as confirmed by the elemental mapping analysis, vide infra) are relatively homogenous in shape (spheroidal). The lattice fringes can nicely be observed on HR-TEM images. The d-spacing (from the observed lattice fringes) of the NiMoC@C sample confirm the XRD outcomes, showing the presence of Ni and MoC planes, (111) and (200) for Ni (0.204 and 0.176 nm) and (101) and (100) (0.52 and 0.251 nm) for MoC phase. It is worth noting that the interface between Ni and MoC could not be unambiguously identified, possibly due to an overlapping of the two phase lattices. Interestingly, while the carbon around the metallic particles is visibly crystalline (Figures 3H,P) and identified as graphite (lattice plane distance of 0.34 nm, very close to the expected value for pure graphite (0.335 nm), the rest of the carbon is clearly amorphous (no lattice fringes observed).
FIGURE 3. EM images of NiMoC@C (A–H) and NiFeMo2C@C (I–P) samples. (A, I) SEM images (B, J) low resolution TEM images. (C–H) HRTEM images of core-shell NiMoC@C samples. (F–G) HRTEM images of selected area in Figure 3D. (F) from area highlighted in green in Figure 3D. (G) from area highlighted in blue in Figure 3D. (H) HRTEM image of highlighted area (in orange) from Figure 3E. (K–P) HRTEM images of core-shell NiFeMo2C@C. (M) HRTEM image of selected area in Figure 3L, from area highlighted in red. (O) HRTEM image of selected area in Figure 3N: from area highlighted in pink. (P) HRTEM image of selected area in Figure 3N: from area highlighted in orange.
TEM images of the ternary system (Figure 3J) show a less homogeneous system, both in size and shape, compared to the bimetallic one. This could be explained considering a disruptive effect of the incorporation of Fe into the NiMoC structure. Yet, also in this case, core-shell structure can be observed (Figures 3K,L,N). The d-spacing for the NiFeMo-based system (Figures 3M,O,P) confirmed the presence of the NiFe phase (0.207 nm) corresponding to the (101) facets of NiFe (Figure 3M), and the lattice distance of 0.260 nm and 0.282 nm corresponding to the (002) and (001) facets of Mo2C and MoC, respectively (Figure 3O).
To gain a further inside into the composition of the systems, elemental mapping images were recorded during TEM analysis (reported in Figure 4), for both NiMoC@C and NiFeMo2C@C. This study confirms the metallic nature of the core and the graphitic carbon shell. For both bi- and tri-metallic systems, the core is composed of Ni and Mo, or Ni, Fe and Mo elements, uniformly distributed and in close contact within the core, with the carbide phase being at the interface with the shell (Figure 4N shows a broader distribution of Mo, partially reaching the outer shell). It has been confirmed that the exposed metallic active sites in the shell can directly interact with the graphitic carbon shell (Ni et al., 2017), which could enhance the OER activity.
FIGURE 4. HRTEM image/bright field TEM images and the corresponding elemental mapping of C, Ni, Mo and O for NiMoC@C (A–G) and C, Ni, Fe, Mo and O for NiFeMo2C@C (H–O).
To have a better insight of the carbon phases, Raman was performed (Figure 2C). Information on graphitization degree and structural defects can be achieved via the so-called G-band and D-band (at ∼1,330 cm-1 and ∼1,590 cm-1, respectively), and by the ratio of their integrated area (ID/IG). From Figure 2C, it can be observed that the Raman carbon bands in the NiFeMo2C@C are more defined and sharper than in the NiMoC@C. Furthermore, the calculated ID/IG is larger for the ternary system, than the bimetallic one (0.96 vs. 0.92, respectively). These findings indicate that in the ternary system the carbon phase is more defined than in the bimetallic one (which explains why no carbon peak was observed in the XRD pattern of NiMoC@C), but possibly turbostratic, i.e., less crystalline than pure graphite.
The modulation of the electronic structures of the NiMoC@C and NiFeMo2C@C nanoparticles were determined by XPS analysis. In Figure 5A, the peaks are shown at around 284.8, 285.58, and 289.2 eV in NiMoC@C, 284.8, 285.8 and 289.2 eV in NiFeMo2C@C. The peak located at 284.8 eV is assigned to the sp2 C=C band of graphitized carbon, while the peaks at around 285.58, 285.8, and 289.2 eV are attributed to the C-C high (C–C sp3 bonds in the amorphous phase), C-O and COO bands, respectively (Smith et al., 2016; Destyorini et al., 2021). High-resolution Ni 2p spectra shows peaks of Ni2p3/2 at 852.66, 856.2 eV and shakeup satellites at 861.5 eV in NiMoC@C, while peaks of Ni2p3/2 at 852.97, 856.54 eV and shakeup satellites at 861.86 eV in NiFeMo2C@C (Figure 5B), which indicates that the chemical states of Ni is Ni0 (Biesinger et al., 2011; Geng et al., 2021) and Ni2+ of Ni(OH)2 (Bancroft, 2000) in both NiMoC@C and NiFeMo2C@C. High-resolution Mo3d spectra can be deconvoluted into five peaks in NiMoC@C, locating at 228.5 and 229.4 ev for Mo3d5/2, 231.86, 233.14 and 235.67 eV for Mo3d3/2, respectively (Figure 5C), which are assigned to Mo0, Mo4+ (MoO2), Mo0, Mo4+ (MoO2), Mo6+ (MoO3) (Pu et al., 2020; Zhang L. et al., 2021). The existence of Mo0 demonstrating the presence of Mo-Mo and Mo-C states of γ-MoC in NiMoC@C (Liu et al., 2023), in this case, the existence of a dominant Mo0 peak along with peaks of oxidation states of Mo (MoOx) can be explained that part of Mo on the surface were oxidized due to exposed to the air (Wan et al., 2014). Three peaks are shown at 228.6 eV (Mo3+), 231.91 eV (Mo3+), ascribing to β-Mo2C and 234.05 eV (Mo4+, MoO2) in NiFeMo2C@C (Wan et al., 2014; Li et al., 2022). This oxidation is inevitable for nanoscale materials because of the surface oxidation of MoC and Mo2C during operations. Furthermore, the shift of Ni2p and Mo3d peaks in NiFeMo2C@C is observed after Fe incorporation, spectrum of Ni in NiFeMo2C@C displays a visible positive shift of nearly 0.3 eV and 0.1 eV compared to the NiMoC@C, indicating the existence of strong electronic interactions between Ni and Fe species while slightly weak interactions exist between Mo and Fe, suggesting electrons transfer from Fe nanoparticles to Ni-Mo in NiFeMo2C@C, and the electron structure can be optimized by the incorporation of Fe. As expected and showed in Figure 5D, no Fe2p signal is observed in the NiMoC@C, while Fe 2p is observed in NiFeMo2C@C. The peaks at 706.85 and 710.98 eV in the Fe region belong to Fe0 and Fe3+ of Fe2O3 (Biesinger et al., 2011). The existence of Fe signal confirms the incorporation of Fe in NiFeMo2C@C. In addition, characteristic peaks of Ni0 and Fe0 were attributed to the presence of NiFe alloy in the catalyst structure. The element contents (wt.%) of different samples are shown in Supplementary Table S2. More amorphous carbon (sp3 C-C bond) was transformed into ordered graphitic carbon in NiFeMo2C@C (63.54 wt.%) than in NiMoC@C (53.33 wt.%), which leads to more amorphous carbon phase remains in NiMoC@C structure (42.11 wt.%) than in NiFeMo2C@C (32.33 wt.%), which is consistent with Raman results.
FIGURE 5. (A) High-resolution XPS spectra of C in NiMoC@C and NiFeMo2C@C, (B) Ni2p in NiMoC@C and NiFeMo2C@C, (C)High-resolution XPS spectra of Mo3d, (D) High-resolution XPS spectra of Fe2p.
The OER performances of NiMoC@C and NiFeMo2C@C were investigated in a typical three-electrode system in O2-saturated 0.5 M KOH. Commercial IrO2 nanoparticles were also tested for comparison. The OER performance of monometallic Ni, Mo2C and Fe3C, and bimetallic NiFe are reported in Supplementary Figure S3 for comparison. The Cyclic Voltammograms (CV) corresponding to the 10th and 1000th cycles are shown in Figure 6A. The absence of significant differences between 10th cycle and 1000th cycles indicated a good durability.
FIGURE 6. Electrochemical performance of as-prepared NiMoC@C, NiFeMo2C@C catalysts and commercial IrO2 NPs toward the OER in 0.5 M KOH solution. (A) CV curves of 10th and 1000th cycles of NiMoC@C, NiFeMo2C@C at a scan rate of 5 mV/s. (B) iR-compensated LSV curves of NiMoC@C, NiFeMo2C@C catalysts and commercial IrO2 NPs at a scan rate of 5 mV/s. (C) Summary of overpotential at j = 10 mA cm-2 and 20 mA cm-2. (D) Tafel plots determined from the LSV curves. (E) EIS measurements at a constant potential of 1.544 V and 1.522 V vs. RHE for NiMoC@C, NiFeMo2C@C respectively.
Figure 6B shows the set of iR-corrected LSV curves recorded for various electrocatalysts at a scan rate of 5 mV S−1. NiFeMo2C@C catalysts require the lowest onset potential (1.522 V) to drive the forward or reverse reaction among them, which suggests a superior OER activity. NiMoC@C bimetallic nanoparticles have a higher requirement of onset potential (1.544 V). Overpotential and Tafel slope were calculated based on the iR-corrected LSV. From Figure 6C, NiFeMo2C@C delivers the lowest overpotential of 292 mV while the overpotential of NiMoC@C exhibits 314 mV at 10 mA cm-2. At current density of 20 mA cm-2, both catalysts present a relatively high overpotential. Both NiMoC@C and NiFeMo2C@C show a much better OER activity than commercial IrO2 nanoparticles, demonstrating their potential to replace the noble metal-based electrocatalysts. The NiFeMo2C@C affords a lower Tafel slope of 65.3 mV dec−1 compare to NiMoC@C (86.0 mV dec−1) in Figure 6D. The OER performance of monometallic Ni, Mo2C and Fe3C, and bimetallic NiFe alloy are reported in Supplementary Figure S3. The bimetallic NiFe catalysts shown the best performance (overpotential 355 mV@10 mA cm-2) towards the OER, and Ni shows a 385 mV of overpotential at 10 mA cm-2, while Mo and Fe carbides are not very active for the OER. The Tafel slope of NiFe (105.6 mV dec−1) is lower than Ni (122.0 mV dec−1) and the monometallic systems, which proves again the OER activity can be optimized with the incorporation of Fe. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was performed to investigate the OER kinetics, shown in Figure 6E. The charge-transfer resistances (Rct) of NiFeMo2C@C reaches the small value of 32.6 Ω at an overpotential of 292 mV vs. RHE. Both small Tafel slope and Rct value indicating that NiFeMo2C@C has fast reaction kinetics, which supports enhanced OER activity.
The NiFeMo2C@C catalyst shown a better OER activity, which can be attributed to Fe incorporation. When Fe is incorporated into the NiMoC lattice, the electronic structure is optimised, electrons can be transfered from Fe nanoparticles to Ni-Mo in NiFeMo2C@C that improves the intrinsic OER activity (Trotochaud et al., 2014; Corrigan, 2019). The Ni or Mo in NiFeMo2C@C appear to have stronger oxidizing power than that in NiMoC@C, resulting in faster OER kinetics and better OER activity (Trotochaud et al., 2014). Additionally, NiFe catalyst has been proven theoretically to be optimal for the OER (Diaz-Morales et al., 2015; Gorlin et al., 2016). Supplementary Table S3 shows a comparison of NiMo-based catalysts tested in alkaline electrolyte toward the OER reported in the literature and compared to the present study.
The long-term stability of the NiMoC@C and NiFeMo2C@C in 0.5 M KOH electrolyte was tested via chronopotentiometry (Figure 7A). The potential of 1.522 V and 1.544 V were given to reach a current density at 10 mA cm-2 respectively. The potential shows no significant changes after working for at least 24 h, which proves the catalytic durability of the samples. TEM images of NiFeMo2C@C taken after 24 h of the OER process are shown in Figures 7B,C. These images show that the core-shell structure is preserved and nanoparticles do not aggregate, possibly due to the presence of the shell, Nanoscaled catalytic materials in fact tend to undergo aggregation during durability tests, which leads to the reduction of their electrocatalytic performance (Ouyang et al., 2018).
FIGURE 7. The chronopotentiometry tests at 10 mA cm-2 in 0.5 M KOH for 24 h (A). TEM images of NiFeMo2C@C after OER process (B, C).
4 Conclusion
In this work, a facile pathway to prepare multi-metallic based systems as OER catalysts has been presented. The systems are found to have comparable properties to noble-metal catalysts and exhibit excellent stability. In particular, the prepared ternary transition metal electrocatalysts with core-shell structure are reported for the first time for the OER process. Both systems, NiMoC@C and NiFeMo2C@C, possess an unique core-shell structure. The obtained NiFeMo2C@C was shown to be stable and active for the OER under alkaline conditions, while the incorporation of Fe showed a positive effect in terms of activity, resulting in an improved OER activity that delivers an overpotential of 292 mV with a Tafel slope of 65.3 mV dec−1 at a current density of 10 mA cm-2 in 0.5 M KOH electrolyte. The improved OER performance of NiFeMo2C@C was attributed to the synergistic effect between NiFe and Mo carbide. In addition, the graphitic shell provides additional mechanical strength and chemical stability under alkaline OER conditions, at the same time, the rich defects structure of ternary alloy can effectively promote the charge transfer and mass transfer from NiFeMo2C@C. Concurrently, the NiMoC@C and NiFeMo2C@C remains stable during OER process in alkaline electrolyte for at least 24 h, making them promising candidates as electrocatalysts for OER process. This study helps to expand the application of the polymetallic alloy and core-shell structure nanomaterials in energy conversion, and it also provides an effective way for the electronic structures design of non-noble metals encapsulated in graphene layers. This work also suggests that, in the future, by optimizing the encapsulated ternary metal proportion and composition, more interface in the bi/ternary core and more electroactive sites in the shell may be achieved.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
XL Investigation, Validation, Writing-Original draft preparation; CG: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, ALL Data curation Writing- Reviewing and Editing.
Acknowledgments
Authors acknowledge SPCS and CSC-QMUL for financial support. Authors are grateful to Dr Isaac Abrahams for his support and advice with the experimental set-up. XRD and XPS measurements were performed thanks to the Material Research Institute of QMUL. SEM and TEM experimental data were acquired at the Nanovision facility at QMUL.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The handling editor [DR] declared a past co-authorship with the authors [CG].
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2023.1162675/full#supplementary-material
References
Ahsan, M. A., Puente Santiago, A. R., Hong, Y., Zhang, N., Cano, M., Rodriguez-Castellon, E., et al. (2020). Tuning of trifunctional NiCu bimetallic nanoparticles confined in a porous carbon Network with surface composition and local structural distortions for the electrocatalytic oxygen reduction, oxygen and hydrogen evolution reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (34), 14688–14701. doi:10.1021/jacs.0c06960
An, L., Yang, F., Fu, C., Cai, X., Shen, S., Xia, G., et al. (2022). A functionally stable RuMn electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction in acid. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 (27), 2200131. doi:10.1002/adfm.202200131
Badrnezhad, R., Nasri, F., Pourfarzad, H., and Jafari, S. K. (2021). Effect of iron on Ni–Mo–Fe composite as a low-cost bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 46 (5), 3821–3832. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.174
Baek, M., Kim, G. W., Park, T., and Yong, K. (2019). NiMoFe and NiMoFeP as complementary electrocatalysts for efficient overall water splitting and their application in PV-electrolysis with STH 12.3%. Small 15 (49), 1905501. doi:10.1002/smll.201905501
Bancroft, H. W. N. Á. D. L. Á. G. M., Legrand, D., and Bancroft, G. M. (2000). Interpretation of Ni2p XPS spectra of Ni conductors and Ni insulators. Phys. Chem. Miner. 27, 357–366. doi:10.1007/s002690050265
Biesinger, M. C., Payne, B. P., Grosvenor, A. P., Lau, L. W. M., Gerson, A. R., and Smart, R. S. C. (2011). Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257 (7), 2717–2730. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051
Chen C, S. K., Wang, A., and Jiang, J. (2018). Catalytic graphitization of cellulose using nickel as catalyst. BioResources 13 (2), 3165–3176. doi:10.15376/biores.13.2.3165-3176
Chen, S., Wang, C., Gao, F.-Y., Yang, Y., Huang, M., Tong, H., et al. (2022). An indium-induced-synthesis In0.17Ru0.83O2 nanoribbon as highly active electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution in acidic media at high current densities above 400 mA cm−2. J. Mater. Chem. A 10 (7), 3722–3731. doi:10.1039/d1ta10022j
Chen, X., Xiao, J., Wang, J., Deng, D., Hu, Y., Zhou, J., et al. (2015). Visualizing electronic interactions between iron and carbon by X-ray chemical imaging and spectroscopy. Chem. Sci. 6 (5), 3262–3267. doi:10.1039/c5sc00353a
Clavel, G., Molinari, V., Kraupner, A., and Giordano, C. (2014). Easy access to Ni3N- and Ni-carbon nanocomposite catalysts. Chemistry 20 (29), 9018–9023. doi:10.1002/chem.201400398
Corrigan, D. A. (2019). The catalysis of the oxygen evolution reaction by iron impurities in thin film nickel oxide electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 134 (2), 377–384. doi:10.1149/1.2100463
Cui, X., Ren, P., Deng, D., Deng, J., and Bao, X. (2016). Single layer graphene encapsulating non-precious metals as high-performance electrocatalysts for water oxidation. Energy & Environ. Sci. 9 (1), 123–129. doi:10.1039/c5ee03316k
Defilippi, C., Shinde, D. V., Dang, Z., Manna, L., Hardacre, C., Greer, A. J., et al. (2019). HfN nanoparticles: An unexplored catalyst for the electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (43), 15610–15616. doi:10.1002/ange.201908758
Destyorini, F., Irmawati, Y., Hardiansyah, A., Widodo, H., Yahya, I. N. D., Indayaningsih, N., et al. (2021). Formation of nanostructured graphitic carbon from coconut waste via low-temperature catalytic graphitisation. Eng. Sci. Technol. 24 (2), 514–523. doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2020.06.011
Diaz-Morales, O., Ledezma-Yanez, I., Koper, M. T. M., and Calle-Vallejo, F. (2015). Guidelines for the rational design of Ni-based double hydroxide electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Catal. 5 (9), 5380–5387. doi:10.1021/acscatal.5b01638
Eum, D., Kim, B., Song, J. H., Park, H., Jang, H. Y., Kim, S. J., et al. (2022). Coupling structural evolution and oxygen-redox electrochemistry in layered transition metal oxides. Nat. Mater 21 (6), 664–672. doi:10.1038/s41563-022-01209-1
Geng, B., Yan, F., Liu, L., Zhu, C., Li, B., and Chen, Y. (2021). Ni/MoC heteronanoparticles encapsulated within nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube arrays as highly efficient self-supported electrodes for overall water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 406, 126815. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126815
Giordano, C., Erpen, C., Yao, W., and Antonietti, M. (2008). Synthesis of Mo and W carbide and nitride nanoparticles via a simple “urea glass” route. Nano Lett. 8 (12), 4659–4663. doi:10.1021/nl8018593
Giordano, C., Erpen, C., Yao, W., Milke, B., and Antonietti, M. (2009). Metal nitride and metal carbide nanoparticles by a soft urea pathway. Chem. Mater. 21 (21), 5136–5144. doi:10.1021/cm9018953
Giordano, C., Kraupner, A., Wimbush, S. C., and Antonietti, M. (2010). Iron carbide: An ancient advanced material. Small 6 (17), 1859–1862. doi:10.1002/smll.201000437
Gorlin, M., Chernev, P., Ferreira de Araujo, J., Reier, T., Dresp, S., Paul, B., et al. (2016). Oxygen evolution reaction dynamics, faradaic charge efficiency, and the active metal redox states of Ni-Fe oxide water splitting electrocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (17), 5603–5614. doi:10.1021/jacs.6b00332
Han, M. H., Pin, M.-w., Koh, J. H., Park, J. H., Kim, J., Min, B. K., et al. (2021). Improving the oxygen evolution reaction using electronic structure modulation of sulfur-retaining nickel-based electrocatalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 9 (47), 27034–27040. doi:10.1039/d1ta07591h
Indra, A., Singh, B., and Yadav, A. (2022). Realizing electrochemical transformation of a metal–organic framework precatalyst into a metal hydroxide–oxy(hydroxide) active catalyst during alkaline water oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A 10 (8), 3843–3868. doi:10.1039/d1ta09424f
Jeong, S., Hu, K., Ohto, T., Nagata, Y., Masuda, H., Fujita, J.-i., et al. (2019). Effect of graphene encapsulation of NiMo alloys on oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Catal. 10 (1), 792–799. doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b04134
Kar, A., Sharma, L., Kumar, A., Halder, A., and Pradeep, C. P. (2022). A facile synthetic strategy for decavanadate and transition metal based all-inorganic coordination polymers and insights into their electrocatalytic OER activity. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022 (9), e202101031. doi:10.1002/ejic.202101031
Khani, H., Grundish, N. S., Wipf, D. O., and Goodenough, J. B. (2019). Graphitic-shell encapsulation of metal electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution, oxygen reduction, and hydrogen evolution in alkaline solution. Adv. Energy Mater. 10 (1), 1903215. doi:10.1002/aenm.201903215
Li, H., Cai, C., Wang, Q., Chen, S., Fu, J., Liu, B., et al. (2022). High-performance alkaline water splitting by Ni nanoparticle-decorated Mo-Ni microrods: Enhanced ion adsorption by the local electric field. Chem. Eng. J. 435, 134860. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2022.134860
Li, S., Chen, B., Wang, Y., Ye, M. Y., van Aken, P. A., Cheng, C., et al. (2021). Oxygen-evolving catalytic atoms on metal carbides. Nat. Mater 20 (9), 1240–1247. doi:10.1038/s41563-021-01006-2
Lin, Y., Pan, Y., Liu, S., Sun, K., Cheng, Y., Liu, M., et al. (2019). Construction of multi-dimensional core/shell Ni/NiCoP nano-heterojunction for efficient electrocatalytic water splitting. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 259, 118039. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118039
Liu, J., Zhang, J., Zhou, H., Liu, B., Dong, H., Lin, X., et al. (2023). Lignin-derived carbon-supported MoC-FeNi heterostructure as efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 629, 822–831. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2022.08.141
Luo, M., and Koper, M. T. M. (2022). A kinetic descriptor for the electrolyte effect on the oxygen reduction kinetics on Pt(111). Nat. Catal. 5 (7), 615–623. doi:10.1038/s41929-022-00810-6
Medford, A. J., Vojvodic, A., Hummelshøj, J. S., Voss, J., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., et al. (2015). From the Sabatier principle to a predictive theory of transition-metal heterogeneous catalysis. J. Catal. 328, 36–42. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2014.12.033
Ni, Y., Yao, L., Wang, Y., Liu, B., Cao, M., and Hu, C. (2017). Construction of hierarchically porous graphitized carbon-supported NiFe layered double hydroxides with a core-shell structure as an enhanced electrocatalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction. Nanoscale 9 (32), 11596–11604. doi:10.1039/c7nr03661b
Niether, C., Faure, S., Bordet, A., Deseure, J., Chatenet, M., Carrey, J., et al. (2018). Improved water electrolysis using magnetic heating of FeC–Ni core–shell nanoparticles. Nat. Energy 3 (6), 476–483. doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0132-1
Ouyang, T., Chen, A. N., He, Z. Z., Liu, Z. Q., and Tong, Y. (2018). Rational design of atomically dispersed nickel active sites in beta-Mo(2)C for the hydrogen evolution reaction at all pH values. Chem. Commun. (Camb) 54 (71), 9901–9904. doi:10.1039/c8cc03975e
Pu, J., Cao, J., Ma, L., Zhou, K., Yu, Z., Yin, D., et al. (2020). Novel three-dimensional Mo2C/carbon nanotubes composites for hydrogen evolution reaction. Mater. Lett. 277, 128386. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128386
Qin, Q., Hao, J., and Zheng, W. (2018). Ni/Ni(3)C core/shell hierarchical nanospheres with enhanced electrocatalytic activity for water oxidation. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces 10 (21), 17827–17834. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b00716
Sanad, M. F., Puente Santiago, A. R., Tolba, S. A., Ahsan, M. A., Fernandez-Delgado, O., Shawky Adly, M., et al. (2021). Co-Cu bimetallic metal organic framework catalyst outperforms the Pt/C benchmark for oxygen reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (10), 4064–4073. doi:10.1021/jacs.1c01096
Shaikh, N., Mukhopadhyay, I., and Ray, A. (2022). Heterointerfaces of nickel sulphides and selenides on Ni-foam as efficient bifunctional electrocatalysts in acidic environments. J. Mater. Chem. A 10 (20), 12733–12746. doi:10.1039/d2ta01630c
Singh, H., Marley-Hines, M., Chakravarty, S., and Nath, M. (2022). Multi-walled carbon nanotube supported manganese selenide as a highly active bifunctional OER and ORR electrocatalyst. J. Mater. Chem. A 10 (12), 6772–6784. doi:10.1039/d1ta09864k
Smith, M., Scudiero, L., Espinal, J., McEwen, J.-S., and Garcia-Perez, M. (2016). Improving the deconvolution and interpretation of XPS spectra from chars by ab initio calculations. Carbon 110, 155–171. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.09.012
Trotochaud, L., Young, S. L., Ranney, J. K., and Boettcher, S. W. (2014). Nickel-iron oxyhydroxide oxygen-evolution electrocatalysts: The role of intentional and incidental iron incorporation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (18), 6744–6753. doi:10.1021/ja502379c
Tu, Y., Ren, P., Deng, D., and Bao, X. (2018). Structural and electronic optimization of graphene encapsulating binary metal for highly efficient water oxidation. Nano Energy 52, 494–500. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.062
Wan, C., Regmi, Y. N., and Leonard, B. M. (2014). Multiple phases of molybdenum carbide as electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 126 (25), 6407–6410. doi:10.1002/anie.201402998
Yan, M., Zhao, Z., Cui, P., Mao, K., Chen, C., Wang, X., et al. (2021). Construction of hierarchical FeNi3@(Fe,Ni)S2 core-shell heterojunctions for advanced oxygen evolution. Nano Res. 14 (11), 4220–4226. doi:10.1007/s12274-021-3531-8
Yang, Y., Lin, Z., Gao, S., Su, J., Lun, Z., Xia, G., et al. (2016). Tuning electronic structures of nonprecious ternary alloys encapsulated in graphene layers for optimizing overall water splitting activity. ACS Catal. 7 (1), 469–479. doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b02573
Zhang B, Z. X., Voznyy, O., Comin, R., Bajdich, M., Garcia-Melchor, M., et al. (2016). Homogeneously dispersed multimetal oxygen-evolving catalysts. Science 352, 333–337. doi:10.1126/science.aaf1525
Zhang, L., Xiao, J., Wang, H., and Shao, M. (2017). Carbon-based electrocatalysts for hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions. ACS Catal. 7 (11), 7855–7865. doi:10.1021/acscatal.7b02718
Zhang, L., Zhu, Y., Nie, Z., Li, Z., Ye, Y., Li, L., et al. (2021a). Co/MoC nanoparticles embedded in carbon nanoboxes as robust trifunctional electrocatalysts for a Zn-air battery and water electrocatalysis. ACS Nano 15 (8), 13399–13414. doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c03766
Zhang, P., Tan, W., He, H., and Fu, Z. (2021b). Binder-free quaternary Ni–Fe–W–Mo alloy as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction. J. Alloys Compd. 853, 157265. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157265
Keywords: OER, ternary transition metal, nanoparticles, core-shell structure, graphitic carbon, binary transition metal, metal-metal carbide hybrid, urea glass route
Citation: Li X and Giordano C (2023) Designed NiMoC@C and NiFeMo2C@C core-shell nanoparticles for oxygen evolution in alkaline media. Front. Chem. 11:1162675. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2023.1162675
Received: 09 February 2023; Accepted: 28 March 2023;
Published: 26 April 2023.
Edited by:
Daily Rodriguez-Padron, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, ItalyReviewed by:
Alain Rafael Puente Santiago, The University of Texas at Austin, United StatesYurong Guo, Tianjin University, China
Copyright © 2023 Li and Giordano. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Cristina Giordano, Yy5naW9yZGFub0BxbXVsLmFjLnVr