Carlos J. P. Monteiro1*
Leandro M. O. Lourenço1*
Heidi Abrahamse2
Juan L. Vivero-Escoto3
M. Amparo F. Faustino1*- 1LAQV-Requimte and Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
- 2Laser Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
- 3Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, United States
Editorial on the Research Topic
Next generation nanomaterials for photodynamic therapy
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a clinically approved treatment for oncologic and non-oncologic diseases and has several advantages over conventional oncological treatments, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery (Dolmans et al., 2003; Correia et al., 2021). The cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by the interaction of non-toxic photoactivable molecules (photosensitizers) with dioxygen leads to cancer cell death with a good cosmetic outcome (Pham et al., 2021). Despite the good progress made with photosensitizer (PS)-mediated PDT, this treatment modality has some limitations, such as PS aggregation, low solubility in physiological media, and tissue/cell specificity (Gunaydin et al., 2021).
Recently, several studies based on hybrid nanoparticles were conducted to improve the selectivity and PDT outcome of PSs (Babu et al., 2022). These hybrid materials can circumvent the limitations of conventional PS drugs, increasing their solubility in biological media and improving PS uptake in targets (Lim et al., 2013). Thus, there is significant room for improvement in new generations of nanomaterials and PS agents that can bring about a novel generation of PSs.
The Research Topic ‘Next generation nanomaterials for photodynamic therapy’ comprises five reviews covering recent developments in the fields of nanomaterials for PDT, mechanistic studies, and improving the targeting of nanoplatforms.
Uprety et al. explored the potential of quantum dots (QDs) as PSs for PDT. The versatility of QDs was highlighted, particularly their optical properties, which can be fine-tuned by varying their size. It is worth mentioning that the main advantage of QDs over conventional PSs is the modulation of emission properties within the near IR, consequently allowing deep-light penetration in cancer tissues. Heavy metal QD toxicity was also addressed as a possible drawback for the biological application of QDs; however, solutions for circumventing this issue were disclosed. Reports on the imaging and PDT of cancer using carbon (graphene) and metallic (Cd)-based QDs were also critically reviewed.
George et al. summarized the development, fundamentals, and applications of plasmonic metallic nanoparticles (NPs) for the improvement of PDT approaches. The properties of plasmonic metallic NPs were discussed and the advantages of this treatment modality over conventional PSs was highlighted. The authors paid particular attention to the mechanistic pathways of plasmonic metallic NPs to support enhancement strategies for 1O2 generation.
State of the art developments in biocompatible nanocarriers and their targeting efficiency in PDT were summarized by Kumar et al. The authors focused particular attention on three types of biocompatible nanoparticles: polymeric nanoparticles, liposomes, and dendrimers. Excellent opportunities in targeted PDT for various types of cancers provided by nanoengineering were reported and corroborated by the obtained results from in vitro and in vivo studies. Additionally, passive and active targeting mechanisms were discussed and considered when using biocompatible nanocarriers to deliver therapeutic drugs/photosensitizers.
An updated summary of the literature concerning the use of nanoscale metal-organic frameworks (NMOFs) as PSs and nanocarriers for PDT was presented by Matlou et al. in their review paper. The authors presented an introduction to the chemistry/preparation of NMOFs and optimization for their application as PSs in PDT. The NMOFs’ morphology, size, and selectivity for cancer cells over healthy cells were also addressed, taking into consideration the correlation with the outcome efficacy of PDT treatment. Current in vitro and in vivo studies were also explored and the targeting strategies that improve overall PDT efficacy were pointed out, i.e., subcellular internalization and stimulus-activated release.
Finally, Rezende et al. reviewed the application of rare earths (RE) as upconversion nanomaterials in PDT and bioimaging. They reported the great advantages of using RE elements for PDT applications of nanomaterials due to their optical properties: UV to NIR excitation wavelengths; photoluminescence emissions; long luminescence decay lifetimes (µs to ms); and high sensitivity. Additionally, the authors highlighted the main advantages of REs for diagnostic imaging: the green and NIR emissions can be used to obtain images in diagnostics; moreover, the red emission can contribute to the therapeutic modality. Furthermore, absorption of NIR light is very valuable because it allows greater penetration depth, thus activating the biophotoluminescent material within the cell.
The Editors hope that the contributions collected in this Research Topic will make an impact on the field, bringing new insights into the research, development, and knowledge on the application of nanoparticles in photodynamic therapy.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Funding
All research by the Laser Research Centre was supported by the South African Department of Science and Innovation and the National Research Foundation Chairs Initiative (DSI/NRF-SARChI, 98337). This work received support from PT national funds (FCT/MCTES, Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior) through projects UIDB/50006/2020 and UIDP/50006/2020 (LAQV-REQUIMTE).
Acknowledgments
All lasers used by the Laser Research Centre were supplied by the National Laser Centre (CSIR). CJPM, LMOF, and MAFF thank the University of Aveiro and FCT/MCT for the financial support provided to LAQV-REQUIMTE (UIDB/50006/2020 and UIDP/50006/2020), through national funds (OE), and where applicable, co-financed by the FEDER-Operational Thematic Program for Competitiveness and Internationalization-COMPETE 2020, within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Babu, N., Rahaman, S. A., John, A. M., and Balakrishnan, S. P. (2022). Photosensitizer anchored nanoparticles: A potential material for photodynamic therapy. ChemistrySelect 7 (17). doi:10.1002/slct.202200850
Correia, J. H., Rodrigues, J. A., Pimenta, S., Dong, T., and Yang, Z. C. (2021). Photodynamic therapy review: Principles, photosensitizers, applications, and future directions. Pharmaceutics 13 (9), 1332. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13091332
Dolmans, D., Fukumura, D., and Jain, R. K. (2003). Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 3 (5), 380–387. doi:10.1038/nrc1071
Gunaydin, G., Gedik, M. E., and Ayan, S. (2021). Photodynamic therapy-current limitations and novel approaches. Front. Chem. 9, 691697. doi:10.3389/fchem.2021.691697
Lim, C. K., Heo, J., Shin, S., Jeong, K., Seo, Y. H., Jang, W. D., et al. (2013). Nanophotosensitizers toward advanced photodynamic therapy of Cancer. Cancer Lett. 334 (2), 176–187. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2012.09.012
Keywords: nanomaterials, nanocarriers, photodynamic therapy, photosensitizers, reactive oxygen species, singlet oxygen
Citation: Monteiro CJP, Lourenço LMO, Abrahamse H, Vivero-Escoto JL and Faustino MAF (2022) Editorial: Next generation nanomaterials for photodynamic therapy. Front. Chem. 10:1123216. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.1123216
Received: 13 December 2022; Accepted: 15 December 2022;
Published: 21 December 2022.
Edited and reviewed by:
Wansong Chen, Central South University, ChinaCopyright © 2022 Monteiro, Lourenço, Abrahamse, Vivero-Escoto and Faustino. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Carlos J. P. Monteiro, Y21vbnRlaXJvQHVhLnB0; Leandro M. O. Lourenço, bGVhbmRyb2xvdXJlbmNvQHVhLnB0; M. Amparo F. Faustino, ZmF1c3Rpbm9AdWEucHQ=