Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Chem., 04 January 2023
Sec. Organic Chemistry

Efficient antibacterial AIEgens induced ROS for selective photodynamic treatment of bacterial keratitis

Wenting Cai&#x;Wenting Cai1Tianyi Shen&#x;Tianyi Shen1Dong WangDong Wang2Tingting LiTingting Li1Jing YuJing Yu1Chen Peng,
Chen Peng1,3*Ben Zhong Tang,
Ben Zhong Tang2,4*
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
  • 2College of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
  • 3Department of Radiology, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • 4Shenzhen Institute of Molecular Aggregate Science and Engineering, School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Hong Kong SAR, China

Bacterial keratitis (BK) is an acute infection of the cornea, accompanied by uneven epithelium boundaries with stromal ulceration, potentially resulting in vision loss. Topical antibiotic is the regular treatment for BK. However, the incidence rate of multidrug-resistant bacteria limits the application of traditional antibiotics. Therefore, a cationic aggregation-induced emission luminogens (AIEgens) named TTVP is utilized for the treatment of BK. TTVP showed no obvious cytotoxicity in maintaining the normal cell morphology and viability under a limited concentration, and revealed the ability to selectively combine with bacteria in normal ocular environment. After light irradiation, TTVP produced reactive oxygen species (ROS), thus exerting efficient antibacterial ability in vitro. What’s more, in rat models of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) infection, the therapeutic intervention of TTVP lessens the degree of corneal opacity and inflammatory infiltration, limiting the spread of inflammation. Besides, TTVP manifested superior antibacterial efficacy than levofloxacin in acute BK, endowing its better vision salvage ability than conventional method. This research demonstrates the efficacy and advantages of TTVP as a photodynamic drug in the treatment of BK and represents its promise in clinical application of ocular infections.

1 Introduction

Bacterial keratitis (BK) is the sixth leading cause of global vision loss, accounting for 3.2% of the 36 × 106 cases in both developing and developed countries, which may be associated with trauma, contact lens wear, ocular surgery, or deficiency of corneal sensation (Davis et al., 2020; Khan et al., 2020; Blindness, 2021). BK is characterized by epithelial defect with corneal stromal inflammation and ulceration. As the progression of BK or without timely and appropriate treatment, corneal abscess, stromal lysis and corneal perforation may lead to severe visual loss ultimately (Han et al., 2020; Tuft et al., 2022). Among bacterial pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus (S.aureus) is the predominant pathogen inducing keratitis since it is a common inhabitant on ocular surface (Silva et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019). The cornea of rats infected by S. aureus was therefore widely utilized to perform the experimental keratitis research (Zhang et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022b). At present, BK is commonly administrated with topical eye drops of broad-spectrum antibiotics such as levofloxacin (LVFX), ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin (Li et al., 2020a). The overuse and misuse of antibiotics are the most important determinant for the occurrence of antibiotics resistance, even with super bacteria occurred (Zhou et al., 2020). In BK, the prognosis of the disease is severely affected by an increasing resistant trend towards widely used empirical antibiotics, such as combinations of cephalosporin or glycopeptide and aminoglycoside (Ung et al., 2019). Besides, norfloxacin was reported to mediate apoptosis by injuring mitochondrial transmembrane and activating death proteins, and eventually leading to necroptosis through RIPK1-RIPK3-MLKL pathway (Yang et al., 2020). In this regard, there is still an urgent need to explore new targets with low incidence of drug-resistance. Therefore, the development of alternative effective antibacterial strategy is urgently needed, which favors the reduction of emergency of the resistance of bacteria.

In response to such a severe situation of drug resistance, sterilization material based on light-to-heat conversion, photocatalysis, chemocatalysis and biological extraction were performed (Huo et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022). Among them, photodynamic therapy (PDT) utilized reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation from photosensitizers (PSs) activated with light irradiation, which has been regarded as a vital strategy to deal with drug-resistant bacterial infections under the background of post-antibiotic era (Chen et al., 2019; Qi et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2021). The generation of abundant ROS could destroy bacterial cell membrane, inducing necrosis and apoptosis of bacteria (Idris et al., 2012; Han et al., 2016). Several studies have reported that PDT performed excellent anti-bacterial ability in the treatment of periodontitis (Li et al., 2021b), diabetic wound healing (Huang et al., 2021), malignant tumor (Cheng et al., 2020), immunomodulatory effects (Ayaz et al., 2020), rheumatoid arthritis (Lu et al., 2018) and bacterial ocular infection (Peng et al., 2021; Li et al., 2022). Encouragingly, PDT has advantage of excellent light transmission property, which is appropriate in the application of ocular infectious therapy (Fan et al., 2021). Thus, PDT with good antibacterial ability and biocompatibility showed a promising potential in the treatment of ocular infectious diseases. However, traditional PSs suffer from fluorescence quenching under irradiation, and generate low ROS due to π-π stacking in the aggregate state, which severely hindered their development of practical application (Liu et al., 2013; Jiang et al., 2018).

Recently, luminogens with aggregation-induced emission (AIEgens) features showed broad application prospects for theranostic applications as PSs (Hu et al., 2018; Kang et al., 2019; Dai et al., 2020; Abrahamse et al., 2022). A delightful phenomenon could be observed that AIEgens exhibited excellent fluorescence and effective ROS creation during aggregation state while showing poor emission in the monomer state, which was resulting from the restriction of intramolecular motions (RIMs) (Mei et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2018a). AIEgens performed promising characteristics of high-efficiency of ROS production, low-toxicity and high-specificity targets (Li et al., 2020b). In addition, AIEgens have been broadly applied in fluorescent bioimaging due to splendid emission efficiency and large stokes shift (Yu et al., 2017). AIEgens have been reported to possess excellent biological applications, including granulomas tracking and targeted theranostics for tuberculosis (Liao et al., 2020), specific bacterial clearance and tumor elimination (Li et al., 2020b), and accelerated reduction of refractory internalized bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (Ni et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021a). Also, Hu et al. reported that M1-DPAN showed specific AIE ability, along with outstanding photostability and biosecurity, which take advantage of visualizing the occurrence of bacterial infection. Besides, it has been reported that AIEgens could selectively identify and aim at bacteria because of cationic charge and appropriate hydrophobicity, and exhibited vision defense via activating early intraocular immune response for bacterial endophthalmitis (Li et al., 2022). Such selective discrimination was attributed to the differences in membrane potential between bacteria and mammals (Yuan et al., 2014). Inspired by the previous studies, the design of cationic AIEgens, which performed selectively elimination of bacteria over normal cells is feasible.

In this study, we designed and synthesized a cationic AIEgens named TTVP, possessing the ability of identification and photodynamic antibacterial of Gram-positive bacteria (Lee et al., 2020), for the therapeutic schedule of bacterial keratitis. For the predominant position of S. aureus in pathogen of keratitis, we work on S. aureus to evaluate the killing efficiency of TTVP both in vitro and in vivo (Scheme 1). First of all, TTVP exhibited no obvious cytotoxicity in maintaining the normal cell morphology and viability under a limited concentration, and selectively combined with bacteria rather than normal ocular cells, which confirmed its biosafety in our following research. Under white light irradiation, TTVP generated abundant ROS production, leading to the death of S. aureus. The excellent killing efficiency of TTVP to S. aureus was further assessed via in vitro antibacterial activity studies. Furthermore, TTVP was applied to treat S. aureus-induced keratitis on a rat model, and excitingly, the infection recovery treated with TTVP was faster than that with LVFX in vivo. Attracted by these results, the outstanding treatment efficiency and good biosafety make TTVP promising for the clinical treatment of bacterial keratitis.

SCHEME 1
www.frontiersin.org

SCHEME 1. Schematic illustration of AIEgen TTVP for efficient photodynamic antibacterial therapy of BK.

2 Experimental section

2.1 Materials and reagents

TTVP was synthesized in compling with the literature mentioned (Wang et al., 2018b). Other chemicals and reagents were bought from J&K Scientific and Sigma-Aldrich. DMEM/F12 cell medium, penicillin, streptomycin and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were obtained from HyClone (United States). Yeasen (Shanghai, China) provided cell counting kit (CCK)-8. S. aureus was acquired from China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center. SD rats were purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).

2.2 Characterization

Mother solution (5 mM) of TTVP was obtained through dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) initially, and then mixed with PBS to certain concentration. The aqueous dispersibility of TTVP in water, PBS and DMEM at the concentration of 5 μM was displayed excellently (Supplementary Figure S1). Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) absorption and fluorescence (FL) spectra were measured by the Perkin Elmer Lambda 25 spectrophotometer and fluorescence spectrometry (Agilent Cary Eclipse), respectively.

2.3 Preparation of bacterial solution

A single S. aureus colony on solid agar plate was added to 10 ml liquid Luria broth (LB) culture medium. After incubation at 37°C overnight at 220 rpm, the bacteria were gathered by centrifugation (9,000 rpm, 3 min) and washed twice. After being resuspended with sterile normal saline, the concentrations were measured at 600 nm (1.0 OD = 108 CFU ml−1). Finally, the S. aureus suspensions were diluted with PBS for further use.

2.4 In vitro antibacterial analysis

A standard plate counting method was carried out to evaluate sterilization effect of TTVP in vitro at concentrations of 0, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 μM. The mixture was exposed to white light lamp for certain min (5, 10, 15 and 30 min), while the control group was exposed in dark. The treated bacterial suspension was diluted (1:5000) and incubated on the agar plate at 37°C for 24 h, followed by quantification and photo taking.

2.5 Assay for reactive oxygen species

ROS accumulation of TTVP was assessed According to a given standard protocol. The mixture of TTVP (0.1 μM) and DCFH-DA was incubated under a white light lamp (20 mW/cm2 power) for 15 min. The fluorescence intensity was recorded via a microplate reader before irradiation and every 1 min interval for 16 times (λex = 480 nm, λem = 525 nm). Meanwhile, OD values of DCFH-DA solution and PBS were recorded as control.

2.6 Zeta potential measurement

S. aureus was collected and resuspended with PBS, followed by incubating with different concentrations of TTVP (0, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 μM) for 15 min. Then Zeta potential was measured via a Malvern Zetasizer.

2.7 Co-culture of bacteria and cells

S. aureus was co-cultured with human corneal epithelial cells (HCECs) to test the selective affinity of TTVP against bacteria. S. aureus suspension was added to pre-cultured adherent HCECs, along with different concentrations (0, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1 μM) of TTVP for 15 min. The slides were sealed and photographed using a fluorescence microscope.

2.8 In vitro cytotoxicity

The possible cytotoxicity of TTVP is a crucial issue to be examined before application. In general, cell viability, cell morphology and live/dead staining were performed to evaluate the biosafety of TTVP in vitro. In order to explore the biosafety of TTVP in keratopathy, research based on normal cells of ocular surface was necessary. Hence, HCECs were selected to evaluate the toxicity of TTVP.

Adherent HCECs were cultured in 96-well plates, being divided into irradiation group (20 mW/cm2, group a) and dark group (group b). After co-cultured with TTVP (0–1.0 μM) for 15 min, HCECs were placed in light or dark environment during the following 15 min. HCECs were continued culturing in the incubator for 24 h after removal of TTVP. Also, the cells were incubated for 24 h at the same concentration of TTVP in dark (group c) to detect the intrinsic cytotoxicity. Afterward, CCK-8 reagent was incubated for 2 h to obtain the fluorescence intensity at 450 nm. In addition, the cellular morphology of HCECs after incubation for 24 h was also recorded via optical microscopy.

For the live/dead staining analysis, HCECs were intervened with TTVP (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 μM) for 24 h. Live and dead cells were labeled with calcein AM and PI, which excited green and red fluorescence under microscope, respectively.

2.9 Hemolysis assay

The hemocompatibility of TTVP was detected through hemolysis assay. Saline was added to the whole blood to wash several times until the supernatant was colorless. After diluting with saline to 2% red cell suspension, different TTVP concentrations (0, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 μM) were added to the above red cell suspension, and heated at 37°C for 1 h. After centrifugation (3,000 rpm, 5 min), the images were captured and the ratio of hemolysis was calculated by the absorbance of supernatants at 540 nm recorded by a microplate reader. The erythrocytes treated with distilled water were regarded as positive control.

2.10 Animal experiments of antibacterial test

2.10.1 In vivo antibacterial test on infected keratitis

The animal procedures involved were in accordance with the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Statement of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital. Six weeks of SD male rats were used to simulate the occurrence of BK as previously described with minor adjustments (Josyula et al., 2021). After general anesthetization by chloraldurate, 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution was performed for local anesthesia. Prior to any operation, the images of rat corneas were captured. The operative eye was then scratched using a blade, and then S. aureus suspension (50 μl, 1 × 108 CFU/ml) was placed over the ocular surface.

After being inoculated for 24 h, the rats were classified into four groups: 1) S. aureus-infected eyes treated by PBS, 2) S. aureus-infected eyes treated by TTVP under dark condition, 3) S. aureus-infected eyes treated by TTVP with light irradiation (20 mW/cm2 power, 15 min), and 4) S. aureus-infected eyes treated by LVFX. Photographs of the ocular surface were captured before treatment, as well as 1, 3 and 7 days after intervention to observe the infection and inflammation. The clinical inflammatory scores were calculated to qualify the severity. Seven days after treatment, eyeballs were fixed for H&E staining, Masson staining and immunohistochemistry staining analysis, or homogenized for spread plate assay.

2.10.2 Clinical inflammatory scores

Clinical inflammatory scores of anterior segments, including size of corneal opacity area (grades 1–4, less than 25% to more than 75%), opacity density of cornea (grades 1–4, slightly misty to dense opacity) and hypopyon (grades 1 and 2, paracentral cornea involved or not) were performed to evaluate the severity of BK as previously reported (Zhang et al., 2019). Thus, the score of normal cornea was 0, while that of different groups was between 0 and 10.

2.10.3 Spread plate test

The isolated corneas were homogenized in 0.5 ml of sterile PBS, diluted and cultured on agar plates for 24 h, followed by quantification and photo taking.

2.10.4 HE, Masson and immunohistochemistry staining analysis

Eyeballs were fixed 7 days after infection for H&E and Masson staining to describe the bacterial histopathological reaction. Meanwhile, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) is the common primary inflammatory protein. Immunohistochemical staining of TNF-α was performed to display the inflammation at the site of the infected corneal lesions at 7 d follow-up. All photos were collected under the optical microscope.

2.11 In vivo biosafety

2.11.1 Organ structure

At the end time points, the rats were sacrificed to harvest the heart, spleen, kidney, liver and lung for histopathology in vivo. After being fixed overnight, the tissues were embedded, sectioned, and stained with H&E, following standardized protocol. Neutral gum was applied to immobilize the sections, then the slides were imaged under an optical microscope.

2.11.2 Serological assay

Whole blood of rats was reversed and centrifuged to obtain serum. Functions were measured according to the instructions. Liver and kidney functions including alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and creatinine (CRE) were measured. Total cholesterol (T-CHO) and triglyceride (TG) reflected blood lipids, while potassium (K+), calcium (Ca2+), and chlorine (Cl-) represented electrolytic levels.

2.12 Statistical analysis

SPSS 23.0 software and GraphPad Prism 5 were utilized for statistical analyses. ImageJ version 1.48 was used for quantification of bacterial colonies. One-way ANOVA was carried out between multiple groups. p < 0.05 were identified as statistically significant.

3 Results and discussions

3.1 Optical property

The synthesis and purification of TTVP were under the guidance to the previous study (Wang et al., 2018b). As represented in Figure 1, UV—Vis and FL spectra were performed to verifythe optical characteristics of TTVP. After incubating TTVP in S. aureus for 15 min, red fluorescence was obviously visible under 365 nm UV irradiation, indicating that TTVP had a remarkable bioimaging effect on S. aureus (Figure 1A). Afterward, as shown in Figure 1B, TTVP solutions alone photoexcited by 489 nm showed no obvious difference in FL intensity under different concentrations. After a mixture with S. aureus at room temperature for 15 min, FL intensity showed the emission maximum wavelength at around 620 nm under concentration-dependent manner. The phenomenon might be due to the change of TTVP aggregation states of TTVP in response to S. aureus. TTVP has a strong affinity for S. aureus and may become a valuable visualization reagent for bacterial research.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. (A) The picture of S. aureus incubated with TTVP at different concentrations for 15 min under 365 nm UV light. (B) FL spectra of TTVP with or without incubation with S. aureus for 15 min (Excitation wavelength = 489 nm). The insert was the photograph of TTVP solution (5 mM) dissolved in DMSO.

3.2 In vitro antibacterial test

The antibacterial property in vitro was tested through traditional spread plate method, and the bacteriostasis was evaluated intuitively by comparing the number of viable bacteria (Zhang et al., 2022a). The bacterial growth in the plate was recorded and the antimicrobial rate of TTVP was calculated. First of all, as shown in Figure 2A, TTVP exerted negligible toxicity without light irradiation process after various concentrations of TTVP intervened. Next, the S. aureus incubated with TTVP was irradiated in an intensity of 40 mW/cm2 for 15 min, showing good bactericidal ability at the concentration of 0.02 μM. In order to optimize the illuminance, we halved the light intensity of 20 mW/cm2 and performed at different durations including 5, 10, 15 and 30 min. As shown in Figure 2A, the antibacterial effect of TTVP exhibited a dose-dependency feature, and enhanced gradually along with the increased concentrations ranging from 0 to 0.2 μM. Amazingly, S. aureus was killed effectively with irradiation (20 mW/cm2) for 15 min, along with 0.1 μM TTVP co-cultured (Figure 2B). In order to better bactericidal effect, this intervention method was applied for further experiments.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. (A) Representative photographs of S. aureus treated by TTVP at different concentrations and irradiation conditions. (B) The surviving colony count of S. aureus treated by TTVP in light condition (20 mW/cm2) for 15 min. (C,D) Cell viability and Live/dead staining images of HCECs treated with TTVP, (a) with light after incubation with TTVP for 15 min and (b) without light after incubation with TTVP for 15 min (c) treated by TTVP for 24 h without light (scale bar: 100 μm). *for comparison among different concentrations of TTVP (0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5 and 1 μM) versus TTVP (0 μM) in light and dark conditions. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001.

3.3 Antibacterial mechanisms of TTVP

Under light irradiation (20 mW/cm2), we further explored the mechanisms of TTVP killing S. aureus by measuring the ROS generation ability within 15 min. As shown in Figure 3, Supplementary Figure S2, abundant ROS was generated by TTVP at the concentration of 0.1 μM under white light irradiation, which demonstrated that AIEgens could generate efficient ROS in an aggregation state. The possible mechanism was the block of energy consumption by the way of non-radiative channels and aggregation-induced intersystem crossing (AI-ISC), inducing the transfer of facilitated energy state between singlet (S1) and triplet (T1) (Xu et al., 2015b; Yang et al., 2016). What’s more, our previous research has shown a terrific generation of singlet oxygen in the aggregation state, inducing the antibacterial ability of TTVP (Lee et al., 2020). Thus, TTVP was expected to be a meaningful photosensitizer for PDT evolvement.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. ROS generation of TTVP at 0.1 μM under light irradiation (20 mW/cm2) for 15 min.

3.4 Imaging of HCECs cells and S. aureus mixure

The zeta potential value of pure S. aureus was −25.31 ± 0.54 mV, while the values were increased to −21.76 ± 1.04, −21.06 ± 1.13, −20.71 ± 0.90 mV, and −18.99 ± 1.50 mV after incubated with TTVP (0.02, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 μM), which verified the affinity of TTVP to S. aureus (Supplementary Figure S3). The co-culture method of HCECs and S. aureus was further employed to verify the selective killing ability of TTVP. As shown in Supplementary Figure S4, in a co-culture system of HCECs and S. aureus, red fluorescence was observed in S. aureus (area circled) and extremely weak in HCECs. TTVP could bind S. aureus specifically under certain concentrations for the surface charge discrepancy. Such a high selectivity reduced the damage on the normal corneal cells, thus implying promising application in BK treatment.

3.5 Biocompatibility evaluation

The biocompatibility of AIEgens should be taken into serious consideration prior to biological application. Since TTVP was administrated on the cornea, HCECs were performed to evaluate the biosafety. In Figure 2C, no significant difference was observed in cell viability of HCECs incubated with TTVP at concentrations under 0.1 μM in dark and light condition. Meanwhile, the cellular morphology and density were observed visually by optical microscope. In Supplementary Figure S5, no obvious cell morphology change and density decrease were observed after TTVP incubation. What’s more, live/dead staining of HCECs was performed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of TTVP. As shown in Figure 2D, the results showed no meaningful differences between live and dead fluorescence after being treated with TTVP (0–0.2 μM) under dark or light condition (20 mW/cm2, 15 min), indicating low cytotoxicity of TTVP. In general, a hemolysis ratio no more than 10% was considered safe and acceptable for biological application (Xu et al., 2015a). It was found that the hemolysis rates were less than 1% after TTVP was added to blood, and calculated to be 0.27% ± 0.001% at the concentration of 0.2 μM (Supplementary Figure S6). Therefore, TTVP in our study was expected to be a promising option in vitro for further application.

3.6 In vivo treatment of BK

3.6.1 Clinical observation

Encouraged by the high antibacterial activity, we employed TTVP to treat severe BK, which is prone to relapse and often leads to refractory ocular damage and blindness. Based on the promising antibacterial efficacy and reliable security of TTVP, we established an experimental keratitis rat model to investigate whether TTVP could be applied for bacterial keratitis treatment. As shown in Figure 4A, after inoculation for 24 h, all rats appeared conjunctival congestion, corneal opacity and decreased corneal transparency to the same extent. Then, after different treatments, obvious differences in ocular manifestation were observed in these groups. In the PBS and TTVP under dark condition groups, the infection worsened severely over time. Three days after infection, the rat cornea exhibited prominent clinical manifestations of edema and muddiness at the damaged lesions. On the contrary, in TTVP with light group (20 mW/cm2 power, 15 min) and LVFX group, the severity of infection was well-controlled, while the TTVP under light condition exhibited better antibacterial efficacy. At day 7, the groups treated with PBS and TTVP without light irradiation showed severe bacterial infection, displaying a more pyknotic corneal opacity. Amazingly, the eye symptoms were alleviated and the transparency of the ocular surface was enhanced in the TTVP with light irradiation group, which was superior to the LVFX groups.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. (A) Representative photographs of rat eyes before and at 1, 3 and 7 days after treatment. (B) The bacterial cultures on agar plates from the corresponding cornea. (C) Clinical score of rat eyes after different treatments; (D) the number of surviving S. aureus in corneas after different treatments at 7 days. # for group PBS versus group Normal, *for group TTVP + Dark, TTVP + Light, LVFX versus group PBS, *p or #p < 0.05, **p or ##p < 0.01, ***p or ###p < 0.001, ****p or ####p < 0.0001, and NS for not significant.

In Figure 4C, the groups treated by TTVP with light irradiation showed significantly lower clinical scores than dark or PBS groups. This demonstrates that light activation of TTVP could effectively reduce the degree of infection, which was consistent with the photographs of rats’ corneas. The strengthened antibacterial ability may be attributed to the ROS potency after light irradiation.

In addition, the corneal tissues were isolated from each group, and then homogenized and distributed on the spread plate to quantitatively evaluate the surviving bacterial colonies. The plates displayed nearly no colony formation in TTVP with light irradiation group, which showed better therapeutic effects than LVFX, further indicating the remarkable therapeutic efficacy of TTVP against BK (Figures 4B, D). Due to the incidence of bacteria resistance after antibiotics application, the sterilization process of TTVP under light condition showed great potential for the treatment of S. aureus-infected keratitis.

3.6.2 Histopathological analysis

Figure 5 displayed photomicrographs of corneal tissue sections stained with H&E, Masson and immunohistochemistry staining of different groups. The normal cornea is composed of five layers, with continuous corneal epithelium and endothelial layer, as well as stromal connective tissue layer with no inflammatory-cell infiltration (Bharti and Kesavan, 2017). Masson staining is used to display the fibers in the tissue and visualize the structure of collagen in the stromal tissue (Meng et al., 2019). However, in PBS and TTVP without light irradiation groups, the epithelial layer was dense and stratified, the stromal layer was apparent edema and massive inflammatory infiltration, and the endothelial layer was focally dense. In comparison with these two groups, TTVP under light irradiation group revealed less severity of corneal edema and reduced inflammatory cell infiltration, which could be attributed to rapid sterilization via ROS generation to alleviate inflammatory response. And the groups treated with LVFX showed less antibacterial ability than TTVP with light irradiation. Next, immunohistochemistry staining of TNF-α was performed to assess the therapeutic efficacy, which was a vital index to evaluate the Inflammation levels. The results showed that the cornea treated with TTVP under light condition exhibited a significant reduction in inflammation levels. All the histopathological results were consistent with the ocular manifestations.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 5. (A) H&E staining (scale bar: 100 μm), (B) Masson staining (scale bar: 25 μm), and (C) Immunohistochemistry staining of TNF-α (scale bar: 100 μm) of cornea in different groups.

3.7 In vivo biosafety

In order to assess the biosafety of TTVP in vivo, H&E staining was conducted on heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney to detect the structural damage, while several biochemical indexes were applied to test the major functions of organs. H&E staining and biochemical indexes are extensively used to visually appraise the structural and functional change respectively (Abdelhalim et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018; Nguyen et al., 2019). As shown in Figure 6, no histomorphological changes were revealed in main organs in vivo, which proved the safety of TTVP in organ structure. Meanwhile, no obvious discrepancy was shown in the content of AST, ALT, TG, T-CHO, CRE, K+, Ca2+ and Cl among all groups, which indicated excellent liver and renal functions, lipid levels, and electrolyte stabilization in this study (Figure 7). TTVP was thus expected to be a promising option in vivo for BK application.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 6. H&E staining of main visceral organs at 7 days post treatment (heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney, scale bar: 100 μm).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 7. Blood biochemistry examination analysis of rats after different treatments. (A) AST (B) ALT (C) TG (D) T-CHO (E) CRE (F) K+ (G) Ca2+ (H) Cl. Group Normal (1), Group PBS (2), Group TTVP + Dark (3), Group TTVP + Light (4) and Group LVFX (5) (NS, not significant).

4 Conclusion

To sum up, a TTVP-mediated and ROS-induced PDT therapy was estimable in bactericidal research of BK. TTVP displayed low toxicity and excellent biocompatibility, ensuring further biological applications. TTVP could selectively combine with S. aureus over corneal cells. TTVP possessed excellent ROS release capacity, and showed specific antibacterial function without apparent cytotoxicity. TTVP exhibited vital status of photodynamic antibacterial therapy over BK injury. Our findings demonstrated that TTVP showed promising possibility as antimicrobials, which may take advantage of clinical application of BK treatment. This work will stimulate extensive application of TTVP as a novel therapy against BK infection.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital Animal Ethics Committee.

Author contributions

CP and DW designed the project and experiments. WC, TS, and TL have carried out the experiments. JY and BT participated in the discussion and revision of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research was supported by Shenzhen Key laboratory of Functional Aggregate Materials (ZDSYS20211021111400001), Shenzhen Peacock Team Project (KQTD20210811090142053), and the Youth Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82101130).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The handling editor declared a past co-authorship with the author BT.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2022.1088935/full#supplementary-material

References

Abdelhalim, M. A. K., Qaid, H. A., Al-Mohy, Y., and Al-Ayed, M. S. (2018). Effects of quercetin and arginine on the nephrotoxicity and lipid peroxidation induced by gold nanoparticles in vivo. Int. J. Nanomedicine 13, 7765–7770. doi:10.2147/IJN.S183281

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Abrahamse, H., Hamblin, M. R., and George, S. (2022). Structure and functions of Aggregation-Induced Emission-Photosensitizers in anticancer and antimicrobial theranostics. Front. Chem. 10, 984268. doi:10.3389/fchem.2022.984268

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ayaz, F., Demirbag, B., and Ocakoglu, K. (2020). Immunoactive photosensitizers had photodynamic immunostimulatory and immunomodulatory effects on mammalian macrophages. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 32, 102034. doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bharti, S. K., and Kesavan, K. (2017). Phase-transition W/O microemulsions for ocular delivery: Evaluation of antibacterial activity in the treatment of bacterial keratitis. Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 25 (4), 463–474. doi:10.3109/09273948.2016.1139136

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blindness, G. B. D., Steinmetz, J. D., Flaxman, S., Briant, P. S., Taylor, H. R., Resnikoff, S., et al. (2021). Vision impairment, C., and vision loss expert group of the global burden of disease, STrends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment over 30 years: An analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet Glob. Health 9 (2), e130–e143. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30425-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, H., Yang, J., Sun, L., Zhang, H., Guo, Y., Qu, J., et al. (2019). Synergistic chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy of endophthalmitis mediated by zeolitic imidazolate framework-based drug delivery systems. Small 15 (47), e1903880. doi:10.1002/smll.201903880

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, J., Wang, W., Xu, X., Lin, Z., Xie, C., Zhang, Y., et al. (2020). AgBiS2 nanoparticles with synergistic photodynamic and bioimaging properties for enhanced malignant tumor phototherapy. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 107, 110324. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.110324

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dai, J., Wu, X., Ding, S., Lou, X., Xia, F., Wang, S., et al. (2020). Aggregation-induced emission photosensitizers: From molecular design to photodynamic therapy. J. Med. Chem. 63 (5), 1996–2012. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b02014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Davis, S. A., Bovelle, R., Han, G., and Kwagyan, J. (2020). Corneal collagen cross-linking for bacterial infectious keratitis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 6, CD013001. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013001.pub2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fan, W., Han, H., Chen, Y., Zhang, X., Gao, Y., Li, S., et al. (2021). Antimicrobial nanomedicine for ocular bacterial and fungal infection. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 11 (4), 1352–1375. doi:10.1007/s13346-021-00966-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, H., Gao, Y., Chai, M., Zhang, X., Liu, S., Huang, Y., et al. (2020). Biofilm microenvironment activated supramolecular nanoparticles for enhanced photodynamic therapy of bacterial keratitis. J. Control. Release 327, 676–687. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.09.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, H., Jin, Q., Wang, H., Teng, W., Wu, J., Tong, H., et al. (2016). Intracellular dual fluorescent lightup bioprobes for image-guided photodynamic cancer therapy. Small 12 (28), 3870–3878. doi:10.1002/smll.201600950

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, F., Xu, S., and Liu, B. (2018). Photosensitizers with aggregation-induced emission: Materials and biomedical applications. Adv. Mat. 30 (45), e1801350. doi:10.1002/adma.201801350

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, J., Wu, S., Wu, M., Zeng, Q., Wang, X., and Wang, H. (2021). Efficacy of the therapy of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy combined with human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-infected wound in a diabetic mouse model. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 36, 102480. doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102480

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huo, J., Jia, Q., Huang, H., Zhang, J., Li, P., Dong, X., et al. (2021). Emerging photothermal-derived multimodal synergistic therapy in combating bacterial infections. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50 (15), 8762–8789. doi:10.1039/d1cs00074h

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Idris, N. M., Gnanasammandhan, M. K., Zhang, J., Ho, P. C., Mahendran, R., and Zhang, Y. (2012). In vivo photodynamic therapy using upconversion nanoparticles as remote-controlled nanotransducers. Nat. Med. 18 (10), 1580–1585. doi:10.1038/nm.2933

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, M., Kwok, R. T. K., Li, X., Gui, C., Lam, J. W. Y., Qu, J., et al. (2018). A simple mitochondrial targeting AIEgen for image-guided two-photon excited photodynamic therapy. J. Mat. Chem. B 6 (17), 2557–2565. doi:10.1039/c7tb02609a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Josyula, A., Omiadze, R., Parikh, K., Kanvinde, P., Appell, M. B., Patel, P., et al. (2021). An ion-paired moxifloxacin nanosuspension eye drop provides improved prevention and treatment of ocular infection. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 6 (3), e10238. doi:10.1002/btm2.10238

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kang, M., Zhou, C., Wu, S., Yu, B., Zhang, Z., Song, N., et al. (2019). Evaluation of structure-function relationships of aggregation-induced emission luminogens for simultaneous dual applications of specific discrimination and efficient photodynamic killing of gram-positive bacteria. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (42), 16781–16789. doi:10.1021/jacs.9b07162

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khan, M., Stapleton, F., and Willcox, M. D. P. (2020). Susceptibility of contact lens-related Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis isolates to multipurpose disinfecting solutions, disinfectants, and antibiotics. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 9 (5), 2. doi:10.1167/tvst.9.5.2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, M. M. S., Xu, W., Zheng, L., Yu, B., Leung, A. C. S., Kwok, R. T. K., et al. (2020). Ultrafast discrimination of Gram-positive bacteria and highly efficient photodynamic antibacterial therapy using near-infrared photosensitizer with aggregation-induced emission characteristics. Biomaterials 230, 119582. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119582

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, G., Xu, L., Jiang, M., and Wu, X. (2020a). Eye drops and eye gels of levofloxacin: Comparison of ocular absorption characterizations and therapeutic effects in the treatment of bacterial keratitis in rabbits. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 46 (4), 673–681. doi:10.1080/03639045.2020.1750626

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Q., Li, Y., Min, T., Gong, J., Du, L., Phillips, D. L., et al. (2020b). Time-dependent photodynamic therapy for multiple targets: A highly efficient AIE-active photosensitizer for selective bacterial elimination and cancer cell ablation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (24), 9470–9477. doi:10.1002/anie.201909706

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, T., Wu, Y., Cai, W., Wang, D., Ren, C., Shen, T., et al. (2022). Vision defense: Efficient antibacterial AIEgens induced early immune response for bacterial endophthalmitis. Adv. Sci. (Weinh). 9 (25), e2202485. doi:10.1002/advs.202202485

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Liu, F., Zhang, J., Liu, X., Xiao, P., Bai, H., et al. (2021a). Efficient killing of multidrug-resistant internalized bacteria by AIEgens in vivo. Adv. Sci. (Weinh). 8 (9), 2001750. doi:10.1002/advs.202001750

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z., Pan, W., Shi, E., Bai, L., Liu, H., Li, C., et al. (2021b). A multifunctional nanosystem based on bacterial cell-penetrating photosensitizer for fighting periodontitis via combining photodynamic and antibiotic therapies. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 7 (2), 772–786. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01638

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, Y., Li, B., Zhao, Z., Fu, Y., Tan, Q., Li, X., et al. (2020). Targeted theranostics for tuberculosis: A rifampicin-loaded aggregation-induced emission carrier for granulomas tracking and anti-infection. ACS Nano 14 (7), 8046–8058. doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c00586

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, K., Liu, Y., Yao, Y., Yuan, H., Wang, S., Wang, Z., et al. (2013). Supramolecular photosensitizers with enhanced antibacterial efficiency. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52 (32), 8285–8289. doi:10.1002/anie.201303387

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y. S., Wei, X., Zhao, X., Chen, L. J., and Yan, X. P. (2021). Near-Infrared photothermal/photodynamic-in-one agents integrated with a guanidinium-based covalent organic framework for intelligent targeted imaging-guided precision chemo/PTT/PDT sterilization. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 13 (24), 27895–27903. doi:10.1021/acsami.1c05705

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, Y., Li, L., Lin, Z., Wang, L., Lin, L., Li, M., et al. (2018). A new treatment modality for rheumatoid arthritis: Combined photothermal and photodynamic therapy using Cu7.2 S4 nanoparticles. Adv. Healthc. Mat. 7 (14), e1800013. doi:10.1002/adhm.201800013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mei, J., Leung, N. L., Kwok, R. T., Lam, J. W., and Tang, B. Z. (2015). Aggregation-induced emission: Together we shine, united we soar. Chem. Rev. 115 (21), 11718–11940. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00263

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meng, E., Chen, C. L., Liu, C. C., Liu, C. C., Chang, S. J., Cherng, J. H., et al. (2019). Bioapplications of bacterial cellulose polymers conjugated with resveratrol for epithelial defect regeneration. Polym. (Basel) 11 (6), 1048. doi:10.3390/polym11061048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nguyen, V. P., Li, Y., Qian, W., Liu, B., Tian, C., Zhang, W., et al. (2019). Contrast agent enhanced multimodal photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography for imaging of rabbit choroidal and retinal vessels in vivo. Sci. Rep. 9 (1), 5945. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42324-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ni, J. S., Min, T., Li, Y., Zha, M., Zhang, P., Ho, C. L., et al. (2020). Planar AIEgens with enhanced solid-state luminescence and ROS generation for multidrug-resistant bacteria treatment. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (25), 10179–10185. doi:10.1002/anie.202001103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peng, C., Sun, W., Zhou, C., Qiang, S., Jiang, M., Lam, J. W. Y., et al. (2021). Vision redemption: Self-reporting AIEgens for combined treatment of bacterial keratitis. Biomaterials 279, 121227. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121227

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qi, M., Chi, M., Sun, X., Xie, X., Weir, M. D., Oates, T. W., et al. (2019). Novel nanomaterial-based antibacterial photodynamic therapies to combat oral bacterial biofilms and infectious diseases. Int. J. Nanomedicine 14, 6937–6956. doi:10.2147/IJN.S212807

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva, C. N. D., Silva, F. R. D., Dourado, L. F. N., Reis, P., Silva, R. O., Costa, B. L. D., et al. (2019). A new topical eye drop containing LyeTxI-b, A synthetic peptide designed from A Lycosa erithrognata venom toxin, was effective to treat resistant bacterial keratitis. Toxins (Basel) 11 (4), 203. doi:10.3390/toxins11040203

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tuft, S., Somerville, T. F., Li, J. O., Neal, T., De, S., Horsburgh, M. J., et al. (2022). Bacterial keratitis: Identifying the areas of clinical uncertainty. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 89, 101031. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.101031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ung, L., Bispo, P. J. M., Shanbhag, S. S., Gilmore, M. S., and Chodosh, J. (2019). The persistent dilemma of microbial keratitis: Global burden, diagnosis, and antimicrobial resistance. Surv. Ophthalmol. 64 (3), 255–271. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2018.12.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, B., Zhou, L., Guo, Y., Guo, H., Zhong, Y., Huang, X., et al. (2022). Cyanobacteria-based self-oxygenated photodynamic therapy for anaerobic infection treatment and tissue repair. Bioact. Mat. 12, 314–326. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, D., Lee, M. M. S., Xu, W., Kwok, R. T. K., Lam, J. W. Y., and Tang, B. Z. (2018a). Theranostics based on AIEgens. Theranostics 8 (18), 4925–4956. doi:10.7150/thno.27787

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, D., Su, H., Kwok, R. T. K., Hu, X., Zou, H., Luo, Q., et al. (2018b). Rational design of a water-soluble NIR AIEgen, and its application in ultrafast wash-free cellular imaging and photodynamic cancer cell ablation. Chem. Sci. 9 (15), 3685–3693. doi:10.1039/c7sc04963c

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, H., Yang, D., Cai, C., Gou, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., et al. (2015a). Dual-responsive mPEG-PLGA-PGlu hybrid-core nanoparticles with a high drug loading to reverse the multidrug resistance of breast cancer: An in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Acta Biomater. 16, 156–168. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.01.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, S., Yuan, Y., Cai, X., Zhang, C. J., Hu, F., Liang, J., et al. (2015b). Tuning the singlet-triplet energy gap: A unique approach to efficient photosensitizers with aggregation-induced emission (AIE) characteristics. Chem. Sci. 6 (10), 5824–5830. doi:10.1039/c5sc01733e

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, L., Wang, X., Zhang, G., Chen, X., Zhang, G., and Jiang, J. (2016). Aggregation-induced intersystem crossing: A novel strategy for efficient molecular phosphorescence. Nanoscale 8 (40), 17422–17426. doi:10.1039/c6nr03656b

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, T., Fan, T. J., and Xu, B. (2020). Norfloxacin induces apoptosis and necroptosis in human corneal epithelial cells. Toxicol. Vitro 66, 104868. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104868

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, C. Y., Xu, H., Ji, S., Kwok, R. T., Lam, J. W., Li, X., et al. (2017). Mitochondrion-anchoring photosensitizer with aggregation-induced emission characteristics synergistically boosts the radiosensitivity of cancer cells to ionizing radiation. Adv. Mat. 29 (15), 1606167. doi:10.1002/adma.201606167

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, H., Liu, Z., Liu, L., Lv, F., Wang, Y., and Wang, S. (2014). Cationic conjugated polymers for discrimination of microbial pathogens. Adv. Mat. 26 (25), 4333–4338. doi:10.1002/adma.201400636

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Jiang, W., Peng, Y., Yang, J., Chu, X., Long, Z., et al. (2022a). Killing three birds with one stone: Near-infrared light triggered nitric oxide release for enhanced photodynamic and anti-inflammatory therapy in refractory keratitis. Biomaterials 286, 121577. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121577

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Liu, S., Yue, J., Sun, S., Lv, Q., Jian, S., et al. (2019). In vitro antimicrobial activity of diacerein on 76 isolates of gram-positive cocci from bacterial keratitis patients and in vivo study of diacerein eye drops on Staphylococcus aureus keratitis in mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63 (4), 018744-18. doi:10.1128/AAC.01874-18

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Chang, J., Zhao, Y., Xu, H., Wang, T., Li, Q., et al. (2018). Fabrication of a triptolide-loaded and poly-&gamma;-glutamic acid-based amphiphilic nanoparticle for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Int. J. Nanomedicine 13, 2051–2064. doi:10.2147/IJN.S151233

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Li, G., Zhang, X., and Lin, L. (2022b). ROS-scavenging glyco-nanoplatform for synergistic antibacterial and wound-healing therapy of bacterial keratitis. J. Mat. Chem. B 10 (24), 4575–4587. doi:10.1039/d2tb00667g

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Yu, Y., Li, G., Zhang, X., Wu, Z., and Lin, L. (2021). Epithelium-penetrable nanoplatform with enhanced antibiotic internalization for management of bacterial keratitis. Biomacromolecules 22 (5), 2020–2032. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00139

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, T., Hu, R., Wang, L., Qiu, Y., Zhang, G., Deng, Q., et al. (2020). An AIE-active conjugated polymer with high ROS-generation ability and biocompatibility for efficient photodynamic therapy of bacterial infections. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (25), 9952–9956. doi:10.1002/anie.201916704

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, Y., Deng, W., Mo, M., Luo, D., Liu, H., Jiang, Y., et al. (2021). Stimuli-Responsive nanoplatform-assisted photodynamic therapy against bacterial infections. Front. Med. 8, 729300. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.729300

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: aggregation-induced emission (AIE), bacterial keratitis, Staphylococcus aureus, antimicrobial materials, photodynamic therapy

Citation: Cai W, Shen T, Wang D, Li T, Yu J, Peng C and Tang BZ (2023) Efficient antibacterial AIEgens induced ROS for selective photodynamic treatment of bacterial keratitis. Front. Chem. 10:1088935. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.1088935

Received: 03 November 2022; Accepted: 28 November 2022;
Published: 04 January 2023.

Edited by:

Jingjing Guo, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Reviewed by:

Fang Hu, Southern Medical University, China
Yu Cai, Hangzhou Medical College, China
Guorui Jin, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China
Meng Gao, South China University of Technology, China

Copyright © 2023 Cai, Shen, Wang, Li, Yu, Peng and Tang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Chen Peng, cpengrr@tongji.edu.cn; Ben Zhong Tang, tangbenz@cuhk.edu.cn

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.