Skip to main content

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Chem., 25 November 2022
Sec. Chemical Biology
This article is part of the Research Topic Fluorescent Probe Technologies for Imaging Biospecies View all 4 articles

Advances in small molecule two-photon fluorescent trackers for lipid droplets in live sample imaging

Dong Joon Lee&#x;Dong Joon Lee1Eun Seo Kim&#x;Eun Seo Kim1Hyo Won Lee,
Hyo Won Lee2,3*Hwan Myung Kim,
Hwan Myung Kim1,3*
  • 1Department of Energy Systems Research, Ajou University, Suwon, South Korea
  • 2Research Institute of Basic Sciences, Suwon, South Korea
  • 3Department of Chemistry, Ajou University, Suwon, South Korea

Two-photon fluorescent trackers for monitoring of lipid droplets (LDs) would be highly effective for illustrating the critical roles of LDs in live cells or tissues. Although a number of one-photon fluorescent trackers for labeling LDs have been developed, their usability remains constrained in live sample imaging due to photo damage, shallow imaging depth, and auto-fluorescence. Recently, some two-photon fluorescent trackers for LDs have been developed to overcome these limitations. In this mini-review article, the advances in two-photon fluorescent trackers for monitoring of LDs are summarized. We summarize the chemical structures, two-photon properties, live sample imaging, and biomedical applications of the most recent representative two-photon fluorescent trackers for LDs. Additionally, the current challenges and future research trends for the two-photon fluorescent trackers of LDs are discussed.

Introduction

Lipid droplets (LDs) are the key organelles in live cells that mainly serve as the lipid repository containing neutral lipids, including triacylglycerol (TAG) and cholesterol ester (CE) (Murphy et al., 1999; Tauchi-Sato et al., 2002; Martin and Parton, 2005; Welte and Gould, 2017). LDs are related to many aspects of cellular biology processes, such as lipid transport, energy storage, signal transduction, and cellular homeostasis (Martin and Parton, 2005; Farese and Walther, 2009; Zehmer et al., 2009; Blom et al., 2011; Greenberg et al., 2011; Olzmann et al., 2013). In recent years, LDs have been prominently regarded as biomarkers of a variety of diseases, including fatty liver, immune dysfunction, obesity, and other diseases related to lipid regulation (Bozza and Viola, 2010; Herker et al., 2010; Krahmer et al., 2013; Abramczyk et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2017; Olzmann and Carvalho, 2019). Furthermore, LDs interact dynamically with other cellular organelles, such as endoplasmic reticulum (ER), plasma membrane, lysosomes, and mitochondria, mainly for LD formation, lipid homeostasis, autophagy, and lipolysis, respectively (Fujimoto and Parton, 2011; Olzmann and Carvalho, 2019; Dejgaard and Presley, 2021; Wang et al., 2021). Therefore, it is highly desirable to establish an imaging method to specifically label the LDs in live samples.

Several approaches have been performed to study the dynamics of LDs using imaging methods, including Raman scattering microscopy, electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy (Fujimoto et al., 2013; Shoham et al., 2014; Zhang and Boppart, 2020; Chen et al., 2022). In particular, the fluorescence microscopy imaging method using LDs-specific fluorescent trackers is advantageous because of its convenience, non-invasiveness, and high sensitivity (Suzuki et al., 2014; Kim and Cho, 2015). To date, a number of LDs-selective fluorescent trackers have been developed (Wang et al., 2016; Collot et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2020; Fan et al., 2021). These trackers have been utilized to label LDs in cells and tissues. However, the most commonly used commercial trackers for LDs are BODIPY 493/503 and Nile Red, which have low LD specificity (Zhao et al., 2022). Moreover, the one-photon (OP) excited fluorescence (OPEF) trackers, which are only applicable to the conventional one-photon microscopy (OPM) are restricted in live sample imaging due to the light scattering, autofluorescence, photodamage, and shallow imaging depth (Kim and Cho, 2009; Lee et al., 2014; Juvekar et al., 2022).

Two-photon (TP) microscopy (TPM), which utilizes two near-infrared (NIR) photons as the excitation source, has emerged as an advanced imaging tool for biomedical research, can afford outstanding features such as low self-absorption and background noise, high resolution, and photostability (Kim and Cho, 2015). TPM can also provide long-term, in-depth real-time imaging of live samples (Kobat et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2020b; Lozano-Torres et al., 2021). Moreover, LD dynamics are sensitive and might be perturbed by the exogenous fluorescent trackers to label them in live samples. It is reported that small molecular size, high target specificity, and low concentration of the fluorescent trackers could minimize such perturbation (Kowada et al., 2015; Werther et al., 2021; Li et al., 2022). However, the lack of small molecule LDs-trackers that are applicable for TPM limits the progress in the study of the dynamics of LDs. In this regard, the development of small molecule and high LDs-specific TP trackers optimized in the micromolar range and with a short incubation time is critical. Most recently, some small molecule TP trackers for LDs have been reported, and their excellent imaging capabilities to monitor the dynamics of LDs in live samples have been evaluated.

This mini-review briefly provides characteristics of the recent small molecule TP fluorescent trackers for LDs (Table 1). The chemical structures of the representative TP trackers are shown in Figure 1. Most of these trackers exhibit excellent two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) properties with LDs-specific labeling capabilities in live samples. The most impressive TP imaging experiments are shown in Figure 2.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Photophysical data of the representative small-molecule TP LDs trackers.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. (A) Illustration for monitoring the dynamics of LDs in live sample by TPM imaging using TP fluorescent tracker. (B) Chemical structures of the representative small molecule TP trackers for LDs. (C) Schematic plot for the emission maxima and TPA values of 110.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. (A) Co-localization experiments of 5 (Green, LDs), Hoechst 33,342 (Blue, nucleus), and Mito Tracker Deep Red (Red, mitochondria). Reproduced with permission from Guo et al., 2018. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (B) Ex vivo two-photon images of live mice liver tissue incubated with or without 6, and the reconstructed 3D image. Reproduced with permission from Niu et al., 2018. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (C) Representative images of hepatic LDs using 8 in the liver of anesthetized mice after normal feeding or fasting. Reproduced with permission from Moon and Kim, 2021. Copyright 2021 The Korean Society of Lipid and Atherosclerosis. (D) Reconstructed 3D TPM images of normal mouse liver tissue and fatty liver disease mouse tissue stained with 9. Reproduced with permission from Han et al., 2022. Copyright 2022 Royal Society of Chemistry. (E) Merged images of dual-color TPM experiments of LDs (Red, 10) and lysosomes (Green, BLT) in the liver of normal mice and MCD diets mice for various time periods. Reproduced with permission from Lee et al., 2022. Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.

Characteristics and TP imaging applications of the representative TP LDs trackers

Most of the fluorescent trackers for LDs are characterized by small size, high lipophilicity, low amphiphilicity, and low conjugated bond number (Thiele and Spandl, 2008; Stockert et al., 2010). The fluorescence quantum yield (Φ) of the LDs trackers should be higher in non-polar solvents (especially in lipid-like environments) than in polar solvents. These can increase the specific labeling ability of the trackers to LDs. Nowadays, researchers have designed TP LDs trackers considering these properties, including strong electron push−pull dipole molecules that have efficient intramolecular charge transfer (ICT). Typically, these small dipole trackers consist of highly lipophilic moieties, strong electron donating groups combined with strong electron withdrawing groups. These features would offer enhanced two-photon absorption cross-section (TPA, δ) values, particularly in non-polar solvents, increasing the specific properties for LDs (Zhao et al., 2022). With the high LDs specificity and with considerable TPA values, we can monitor the dynamics of LDs in live samples via TPM imaging using the innovative TP LDs trackers (Figure 1A).

In 2017, Tang et al. introduced a Zn-Salen ligand complex TP LDs tracker (1, LD-TPZn, Figure 1B) and demonstrated its live cell imaging ability to specifically label LDs (Tang et al., 2017). 1 showed absorption maxima at 599 nm and emission maxima at 630 nm, with a fluorescence quantum yield of 0.44. Additionally, it exhibited a TPA of 110 GM in the 790–880 nm emission window. It showed high cell viability and photostability, compared with the commercial LDs trackers. The cellular uptake via clathrin-mediated endocytosis might contribute to the high LD specificity of 1. Owing to the low light scattering, high resolution, and deep penetration features of the TPM, they successfully visualized the biogenesis of LDs in adipocytes and the 3D distribution of LDs in rat adipose tissues. Furthermore, 1 can be utilized as a TP LDs tracker to apply in adipose tissue, one of the difficult samples for conventional OPM imaging due to the severe light scattering.

Jiang and co-workers reported an aggregation-induced emission (AIE) based TP LDs tracker (2, TPA-BI, Figure 1B) and applied it to mouse liver tissue slices to target LDs (Jiang et al., 2017). This tracker is composed of a triphenylamine electron donor and a benzylidene imidazolone electron acceptor. AIE based trackers for LDs have many advantages of larger Stokes shift, higher brightness, and better photostability than commercial trackers. 2 displayed both twisted intramolecular charge transfer (TICT) and AIE characteristics with a considerable TPA of 213 GM. In live HeLa, HepG-2, and A549 cell lines, 2 showed bright OPEF and TPEF specifically in LDs, and was also applicable to LDs analysis by flow cytometry. Compared with the commercial LDs trackers, 2 was more appropriate for TPM imaging of LDs’ deeper penetration in tissues and it can be further applied to monitor the localized polarity of complex samples under TP excitation. Owing to the synthetic convenience, further modifications of this tracker for labeling of other organelles are feasible for various biomedical research and clinical diagnosis.

In the same year, Tang group synthesized 2-(4-(diphenylamino)benzylidene)-1H-indene-1,3(2H)-dione (3, IND-TPA, Figure 1B) as an AIE fluorescent tracker for LDs imaging (Gao et al., 2017). This tracker has both AIE and TICT properties; 478–502 nm absorption maxima; 594–612 nm emission maxima; and a fluorescence quantum yield of 0.07–0.10, dependent on the polarity. In live HCC827 and A549 cell lines, 3 exhibited high overlap with the commercial LDs tracker, fast cell loading ability, low cytotoxicity, and excellent TPA of 119 GM at 920 nm TP excitation. This easily accessible AIE tracker for specific imaging of LDs in live cells can be utilized to detect the dynamic change of LDs with high photostability and spatiotemporal resolution in the aggregate state. It is expected that 3 can serve as an efficient and accessible imaging tool for the study of biological functions of LDs in real-time.

In 2018, Zheng et al. reported NIR AIE based TP trackers (4-1 and 4-2, DCMa and DCPy, Figure 1B) and demonstrated their application to photodynamic therapy (PDT) of cancer cells (Zheng et al., 2018). They have synthesized four compounds containing a triphenylamine donor with twisted molecular conformations exhibiting AIE characteristics. Among these, 4-1 and 4-2 include malononitrile and methylpyridinium salt, respectively, as an electron withdrawing group, and exhibited a high TPA of about 390 GM at 900–940 nm TP excitation. Though the conjugation length of 4-1 is similar to that of 2, 4-1 showed 45 nm bathochromic emission shift and about 2-fold TPA increase compared to 2. These might be due to the planar configuration of the carbazole linker of 4-2 instead of the rotatable diphenyl linker of 2. With a very low imaging concentration of 1.0 μM, 4-1 can efficiently track LDs in live samples with a tissue penetration depth of 150 μm. On the other hand, 4-2 specifically stained mitochondria, probably due to its cationic character. Importantly, 4-2 efficiently generated singlet oxygen under white-light irradiation, allowing its useful application in the PDT of cancer cells. 4-2 has great potential as the OP and TP imaging agent for organelle-specific and image-guided PDT of cancer. Overall, 4-1 and 4-2 not only serve as NIR emission, efficient TPA properties, and organelle-specific labeling ability, but also may facilitate the development of TP imaging agents for organelle-specific therapy.

Yu group utilized an amphiphilic TP LDs tracker (5, N-Cy, Figure 1B) by introducing a 2,3,3-trimethyl-indoleninium group into a nitrobenzoxadiazole fluorophore (Guo et al., 2018). Most of LDs trackers utilized LDs’ hydrophobic neutral lipid cores, and cannot differentiate neutral lipid cores of LDs from intracellular other lipophilic compartments. They considered the exceptional interfacial architecture of LDs, and proposed a novel interface-targeting strategy for the first time. Through the lipophilic and electrostatic interaction, this amphiphilic tracker predominantly stained LDs by interface-targeting property in live HeLa cells. The co-localization experiments with the commercial LDs, nucleus, and mitochondria trackers demonstrated the high LD specificity of 5. The OPEF signals of blue color are from Hoechst 33342 for the nucleus, green from 5 for LDs, and red from Mito Tracker Deep Red (MTDR) for mitochondria, respectively (Figure 2A). Through TPM imaging, it can be used to visualize the changes of LDs as well as their malfunctions in live hepatic tissues. This study can serve as an effective standard to monitor the changes in LDs and the interface-targeting strategy for designing organelle trackers with ultrahigh specificity.

Niu et al. developed a novel AIE based LDs tracker (6, NAP-CF3, Figure 1B) and described the specific visualization of LDs in live cells and tissues (Niu et al., 2018). They have synthesized AIE luminogens (AIEgens) that consist of a naphthalene core and four different electron-accepting groups. All these novel AIEgens showed good solid-state fluorescence quantum yield, large Stokes shift, and high TPA from 45 to 100 GM with 860 nm TP excitation. The use of an ultralow concentration of the fluorescent trackers could reduce the disruption of LD dynamics (Neef and Schultz, 2009; Kowada et al., 2015). Stained with an ultralow concentration (50–100 nM) in live HeLa cells, these AIEgens exhibited outstanding LD labeling ability with low background noise. Using 6 as the representative example, TP imaging analysis of LDs in live HeLa cells and liver tissues of mice at a depth of 70 μm (Figure 2B). 6 also showed remarkable photostability and biocompatibility. This research offers a useful method to ideally design and develop new AIEgens that are specific to LDs in live samples.

In 2020, Kim group reported six candidate compounds that are compatible with both OPM and TPM for monitoring of LDs in live hepatic cells and tissues (Cho et al., 2020). Among these compounds, 7 (Probe 3, Figure 1B) selectively stain LDs with a considerable TPA value (166 GM), probably due to the efficient ICT by the dimethylamino benzofuran donor and isophthalonitrile acceptor. It displayed the absorption and emission maxima at 444 nm and 513 nm, respectively, and a quantum yield of 0.98 in toluene. TPM imaging analysis using 7 revealed that the increase of LDs in response to ER stress or oleic acid in live cells and in mouse hepatic tissues. Importantly, 7 showed narrow absorption and emission spectra, so it is suitable for multicolor imaging. Therefore, this tracker is useful for monitoring of the interaction between LDs and other organelles as well as LDs-related cellular signaling in live samples. By co-staining with the commercial OP lysosomal tracker (Lyso Tracker Red), 7 allowed the reliable evaluation of steatosis and phospholipidosis in live hepatic cells after drug treatments. It might be a useful imaging tool for tracking the progress of LDs-related liver diseases as well as screening drugs for hepatotoxicity.

Later, Moon and Kim established an intravital TP imaging method using a small LDs tracker (8, SF-44, Figure 1B) and demonstrated the dynamic alteration of hepatic LDs (Moon and Kim, 2021). 8, a TP tracker for LD imaging (Kim et al., 2015), was used to specifically stain LDs in vivo by intravenous injection. Within 10 min, labeled LDs in hepatocytes and the stained small molecular trackers were entirely cleared out of the cytoplasm after 4 h, which allowed repetitive intravital TPM imaging. Especially, they successfully visualized continuous accumulation of hepatic LDs after fasting for 48 h, probably due to the unnecessary influx of fatty acids distributed from adipocytes (Figure 2C). In addition, they found that the increases in the number of LDs with an average diameter of below 2 μm resulted in a markedly enlarged volume of hepatic LDs after fasting. The increased hepatic LDs after fasting were significantly diminished and the occupation of the hepatic LDs was restored to normal with refeeding for 24 h. This intravital TPM imaging method established in this study might be a highly advantageous imaging technique for future research into novel cellular mechanisms involved in the physiological and pathological dynamics of LDs.

In 2022, Han and co-workers synthesized a 5-(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)thiophene-2-carbaldehyde as the TP LDs tracker (9, DTPC, Figure 1B), and applied it to monitor hepatic LDs in steatosis model (Han et al., 2022). They described the commercially viable LDs-specific TP tracker that possesses helpful characteristics, including a sharp absorption/emission band, a significant Stokes shift, and high brightness. 9 showed high polarity-dependency in various solvents, and obvious bathochromic shifts were observed as the polarity of the solvents increased. This revealed that the excited state of 9 has a larger dipole moment than the ground state. In various cell lines, including HeLa, A549, and L929, 9 exhibited bright fluorescent dots in all types of the cell lines, showing their universality in live cells. Moreover, the live hepatic tissues at a depth of 10 μm in steatosis model mice were successfully visualized in real-time with 9 (Figure 2D). In the near future, this polarity-sensitive, commercially feasible TP LDs tracker might be further extended to monitor the detailed origins and dynamics of LDs in live samples.

Most recently, Lee et al. developed a red-emissive TP tracker for LDs (10, LD1, Figure 1B), and visualized the dynamics of LDs in real-time live sample imaging (Lee et al., 2022). Although the conjugation length of 10 is shorter than that of 4-1, 10 exhibited significant TPA values (150–610 GM) with the emission maxima at 520–640 nm. This might be attributed to the stronger electron donating efficiency of the cyclized diamine fused benzofuran moiety. When applied to TPM experiments in human hepatocyte cells and in vivo mouse hepatic tissues, 10 showed bright fluorescence specifically in LDs to assess the level of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (Figure 2E). They did not only find that the hepatic sinusoids became narrower with the enlarged size of LDs but also monitored the moment of the fusion of LDs in hepatic diseased models. Most importantly, through the dual-color in vivo TPM imaging with a TP lysosome tracker, 10 might provide a promising drug screening method in pharmaceutical fields to evaluate the drug-induced liver injury inducing chemicals in advance. Later, intravital monitoring of the dynamic degradation of LDs in MS-275-treated mice was successfully accomplished by using 10 through TPM analysis (Lee et al., 2022). The multi-color imaging technique described in this research can serve as a powerful guideline to develop and apply novel fluorescent trackers for various organelles.

Conclusion and outlook

Intensive studies have been conducted to monitor LDs in recent years to understand their complicated dynamics in cells. The fluorescence imaging technique is the most reliable method. However, the specific aspects of the biological functions and the related metabolisms of LDs in live samples remain challenging. Therefore, novel fluorescent trackers that have low self-absorption and background noise, high resolution, and photostability could be a powerful tool for studying the dynamics of LDs. Most recently, as described above, some of the TP fluorescent trackers for LDs have been developed with superior advantages to the OP trackers for LDs. Using TPM, these TP LDs trackers could provide high quality, real-time, deep tissue imaging in live cells and tissues. Furthermore, multi-color imaging with these TP LDs trackers and other organelle trackers might be useful for monitoring the organelle interactions in a certain physiological and pathological status. In bio-medical applications, these may serve as a diagnosis, prognosis, drug screening, or therapy agent of LDs-related diseases.

More consideration should be given to TP LDs trackers and their bio-medical applications in the future for the progressive advances in this important research topic. It is very important that LDs interact dynamically with other cellular organelles, especially in LD generation, cellular homeostasis, lipid and membrane synthesis, autophagy, and other processes. For example, Huang et al. (2022) visualized the LDs and lysosomes under lipophagy process, and Wang et al. (2020a) monitored the dynamic changes of LDs and mitochondria during oxidative stress. To get the fully reliable information about the complicated interactions of LDs with other organelles in various diseases, it is crucial to develop novel TP LDs trackers that cover the emission wavelengths from blue to deep red region in the future. The full-color TP LD trackers could be a valuable method to understand LDs-related phenomena in live samples.

Author contributions

DL and EK wrote the original draft. DL and EK contributed equally to this work. HL proposed this project and revised the draft. HK designed and supervised the project and mainly wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the final manuscript to be submitted.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Leading Research Lab Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (NRF-2022R1A2B5B03001607), Center for Convergence Research of Neurological Disorders (NRF-2019R1A5A2026045), Basic Science Research Program (NRF-2021R1A6A1A10044950), and the Ajou University Research Fund.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Abramczyk, H., Surmacki, J., Kopec, M., Olejnik, A. K., Lubecka-Pietruszewska, K., and Fabianowska-Majewska, K. (2015). The role of lipid droplets and adipocytes in cancer. Raman imaging of cell cultures: MCF10A, MCF7, and MDA-MB-231 compared to adipocytes in cancerous human breast tissue. Analyst 140 (7), 2224–2235. doi:10.1039/c4an01875c

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blom, T., Somerharju, P., and Ikonen, E. (2011). Synthesis and biosynthetic trafficking of membrane lipids. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3 (8), a004713. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a004713

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bozza, P. T., and Viola, J. P. (2010). Lipid droplets in inflammation and cancer. Prostagl. Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 82 (4–6), 243–250. doi:10.1016/j.plefa.2010.02.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, T., Yavuz, A., and Wang, M. C. (2022). Dissecting lipid droplet biology with coherent Raman scattering microscopy. J. Cell Sci. 135 (5), jcs252353. doi:10.1242/jcs.252353

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cho, M. K., Seo, M. J., Juvekar, V., Jo, J. H., Kim, W., Choi, K. S., et al. (2020). Screening of drug-induced steatosis and phospholipidosis using lipid droplet-selective two-photon probes. Anal. Chem. 92 (16), 11223–11231. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01728

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Collot, M., Fam, T. K., Ashokkumar, P., Faklaris, O., Galli, T., Danglot, L., et al. (2018). Ultrabright and fluorogenic probes for multicolor imaging and tracking of lipid droplets in cells and tissues. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (16), 5401–5411. doi:10.1021/jacs.7b12817

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dejgaard, S. Y., and Presley, J. F. (2021). Interactions of lipid droplets with the intracellular transport machinery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (5), 2776. doi:10.3390/ijms22052776

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fan, L., Wang, X., Zan, Q., Fan, L., Li, F., Yang, Y., et al. (2021). Lipid droplet-specific fluorescent probe for in vivo visualization of polarity in fatty liver, inflammation, and cancer models. Anal. Chem. 93 (22), 8019–8026. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farese, R. V., and Walther, T. C. (2009). Lipid droplets finally get a little RESPECT. Cell 139 (5), 855–860. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fujimoto, T., Ohsaki, Y., Suzuki, M., and Cheng, J. (2013). Imaging lipid droplets by electron microscopy. Methods Cell Biol. 116, 227–251. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-408051-5.00012-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fujimoto, T., and Parton, R. G. (2011). Not just fat: The structure and function of the lipid droplet. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3 (3), a004838. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a004838

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, M., Su, H., Li, S., Lin, Y., Ling, X., Qin, A., et al. (2017). An easily accessible aggregation-induced emission probe for lipid droplet-specific imaging and movement tracking. Chem. Commun. 53 (5), 921–924. doi:10.1039/c6cc09471f

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Greenberg, A. S., Coleman, R. A., Kraemer, F. B., McManaman, J. L., Obin, M. S., Puri, V., et al. (2011). The role of lipid droplets in metabolic disease in rodents and humans. J. Clin. Investig. 121 (6), 2102–2110. doi:10.1172/JCI46069

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, L., Tian, M., Feng, R., Zhang, G., Zhang, R., Li, X., et al. (2018). Interface-targeting strategy enables two-photon fluorescent lipid droplet probes for high-fidelity imaging of turbid tissues and detecting fatty liver. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 10 (13), 10706–10717. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b00278

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, J., Lee, H. W., Chen, Y., Li, H., Kim, H. M., and Yoon, J. (2022). Observing hepatic steatosis with a commercially viable two-photon fluorogenic probe. Mat. Chem. Front. 6 (5), 553–560. doi:10.1039/D1QM01665B

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Herker, E., Harris, C., Hernandez, C., Carpentier, A., Kaehlcke, K., Rosenberg, A. R., et al. (2010). Efficient hepatitis C virus particle formation requires diacylglycerol acyltransferase-1. Nat. Med. 16 (11), 1295–1298. doi:10.1038/nm.2238

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, H., Bu, Y., Yu, Z. P., Rong, M., Li, R., Wang, Z., et al. (2022). Solvatochromic Two-Photon Fluorescent Probe Enables In Situ Lipid Droplet Multidynamics Tracking for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver and Inflammation Diagnoses. Anal. Chem. 94 (39), 13396–13403. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.2c01960

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, M., Gu, X., Lam, J. W. Y., Zhang, Y., Kwok, R. T. K., Wong, K. S., et al. (2017). Two-photon AIE bio-probe with large Stokes shift for specific imaging of lipid droplets. Chem. Sci. 8 (8), 5440–5446. doi:10.1039/c7sc01400g

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Juvekar, V., Lee, H. W., Lee, D. J., and Kim, H. M. (2022). Two-photon fluorescent probes for quantitative bio-imaging analysis in live tissues. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 157, 116787. doi:10.1016/j.trac.2022.116787

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, E., Lee, Y., Lee, S., and Park, S. B. (2015). Discovery, understanding, and bioapplication of organic fluorophore: A case study with an indolizine-based novel fluorophore, seoul-fluor. Acc. Chem. Res. 48 (3), 538–547. doi:10.1021/ar500370v

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, H. M., and Cho, B. R. (2015). Small-molecule two-photon probes for bioimaging applications. Chem. Rev. 115 (11), 5014–5055. doi:10.1021/cr5004425

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, H. M., and Cho, B. R. (2009). Two-photon probes for intracellular free metal ions, acidic vesicles, and lipid rafts in live tissues. Acc. Chem. Res. 42 (7), 863–872. doi:10.1021/ar800185u

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kobat, D., Horton, N. G., and Xu, C. (2011). In vivo two-photon microscopy to 1.6-mm depth in mouse cortex. J. Biomed. Opt. 16 (10), 1. doi:10.1117/1.3646209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kowada, T., Maeda, H., and Kikuchi, K. (2015). BODIPY-based probes for the fluorescence imaging of biomolecules in living cells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (14), 4953–4972. doi:10.1039/c5cs00030k

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, C. G., Lee, S. J., Park, S., Choi, S. E., Song, M. W., Lee, H. W., et al. (2022). In vivo two-photon imaging analysis of dynamic degradation of hepatic lipid droplets in MS-275-treated mouse liver. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 (17), 9978. doi:10.3390/ijms23179978

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, H. W., Heo, C. H., Sen, D., Byun, H. O., Kwak, I. H., Yoon, G., et al. (2014). Ratiometric two-photon fluorescent probe for quantitative detection of beta-galactosidase activity in senescent cells. Anal. Chem. 86 (20), 10001–10005. doi:10.1021/ac5031013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, H. W., Lee, I. J., Lee, S. J., Kim, Y. R., and Kim, H. M. (2022). Highly sensitive two-photon lipid droplet tracker for in vivo screening of drug induced liver injury. ACS Sens. 7 (4), 1027–1035. doi:10.1021/acssensors.1c02679

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y. X., Xie, D. T., Yang, Y. X., Chen, Z., Guo, W. Y., and Yang, W. C. (2022). Development of small-molecule fluorescent probes targeting enzymes. Molecules 27 (14), 4501. doi:10.3390/molecules27144501

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Q., Luo, Q., Halim, A., and Song, G. (2017). Targeting lipid metabolism of cancer cells: A promising therapeutic strategy for cancer. Cancer Lett. 401, 39–45. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2017.05.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lozano-Torres, B., Blandez, J. F., Galiana, I., Lopez-Dominguez, J. A., Rovira, M., Paez-Ribes, M., et al. (2021). A two-photon probe based on naphthalimide-styrene fluorophore for the in vivo tracking of cellular senescence. Anal. Chem. 93 (5), 3052–3060. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.0c05447

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martin, S., and Parton, R. G. (2005). Caveolin, cholesterol, and lipid bodies. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 16 (2), 163–174. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2005.01.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moon, J., and Kim, P. (2021). Intravital two-photon imaging of dynamic alteration of hepatic lipid droplets in fasted and refed state. J. Lipid Atheroscler. 10 (3), 313–321. doi:10.12997/jla.2021.10.3.313

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Murphy, D. J., and Vance, J. (1999). Mechanisms of lipid-body formation. Trends biochem. Sci. 24 (3), 109–115. doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01349-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Neef, A. B., and Schultz, C. (2009). Selective fluorescence labeling of lipids in living cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 (8), 1498–1500. doi:10.1002/anie.200805507

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Niu, G., Zhang, R., Kwong, J. P. C., Lam, J. W. Y., Chen, C., Wang, J., et al. (2018). Specific two-photon imaging of live cellular and deep-tissue lipid droplets by lipophilic AIEgens at ultralow concentration. Chem. Mat. 30 (14), 4778–4787. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01943

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Olzmann, J. A., and Carvalho, P. (2019). Dynamics and functions of lipid droplets. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20 (3), 137–155. doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0085-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Olzmann, J. A., Richter, C. M., and Kopito, R. R. (2013). Spatial regulation of UBXD8 and p97/VCP controls ATGL-mediated lipid droplet turnover. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110 (4), 1345–1350. doi:10.1073/pnas.1213738110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shoham, N., Girshovitz, P., Katzengold, R., Shaked, N. T., Benayahu, D., and Gefen, A. (2014). Adipocyte stiffness increases with accumulation of lipid droplets. Biophys. J. 106 (6), 1421–1431. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2014.01.045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stockert, J. C., Abasolo, M. I., Blazquez-Castro, A., Horobin, R. W., Revilla, M., and Lombardo, D. M. (2010). Selective labeling of lipid droplets in aldehyde fixed cell monolayers by lipophilic fluorochromes. Biotech. Histochem. 85 (5), 277–283. doi:10.3109/10520290903196183

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suzuki, N., Fukazawa, A., Nagura, K., Saito, S., Kitoh-Nishioka, H., Yokogawa, D., et al. (2014). A strap strategy for construction of an excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) system with dual fluorescence. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 (31), 8231–8235. doi:10.1002/anie.201404867

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tang, J., Zhang, Y., Yin, H. Y., Xu, G., and Zhang, J. L. (2017). Precise labeling and tracking of lipid droplets in adipocytes using a luminescent ZnSalen complex. Chem. Asian J. 12 (19), 2533–2538. doi:10.1002/asia.201701010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tauchi-Sato, K., Ozeki, S., Houjou, T., Taguchi, R., and Fujimoto, T. (2002). The surface of lipid droplets is a phospholipid monolayer with a unique Fatty Acid composition. J. Biol. Chem. 277 (46), 44507–44512. doi:10.1074/jbc.M207712200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thiele, C., and Spandl, J. (2008). Cell biology of lipid droplets. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 20 (4), 378–385. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2008.05.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, K., Ma, S., Ma, Y., Zhao, Y., Xing, M., Zhou, L., et al. (2020a). Aurone derivative revealing the metabolism of lipid droplets and monitoring oxidative stress in living cells. Anal. Chem. 92 (9), 6631–6636. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00456

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, K., Ma, W., Xu, Y., Liu, X., Chen, G., Yu, M., et al. (2020b). Design of a novel mitochondria targetable turn-on fluorescence probe for hydrogen peroxide and its two-photon bioimaging applications. Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (12), 3149–3152. doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2020.08.039

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Liu, J., Miao, Z., Pan, Q., and Cao, W. (2021). Lipid droplets and their interactions with other organelles in liver diseases. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 133, 105937. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2021.105937

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Gui, C., Zhao, E., Wang, J., Li, X., Qin, A., et al. (2016). Specific fluorescence probes for lipid droplets based on simple AIEgens. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 8 (16), 10193–10200. doi:10.1021/acsami.6b01282

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Welte, M. A., and Gould, A. P. (2017). Lipid droplet functions beyond energy storage. Biochimica Biophysica Acta - Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1862 (10), 1260–1272. doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.07.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Werther, P., Yserentant, K., Braun, F., Grussmayer, K., Navikas, V., Yu, M., et al. (2021). Bio-orthogonal red and far-red fluorogenic probes for wash-free live-cell and super-resolution microscopy. ACS Cent. Sci. 7 (9), 1561–1571. doi:10.1021/acscentsci.1c00703

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zehmer, J. K., Huang, Y., Peng, G., Pu, J., Anderson, R. G., and Liu, P. (2009). A role for lipid droplets in inter-membrane lipid traffic. Proteomics 9 (4), 914–921. doi:10.1002/pmic.200800584

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, C., and Boppart, S. A. (2020). Dynamic signatures of lipid droplets as new markers to quantify cellular metabolic changes. Anal. Chem. 92 (24), 15943–15952. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03366

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Yuan, L., Jiang, J., Hu, J., du Rietz, A., Cao, H., et al. (2020). Light-up lipid droplets dynamic behaviors using a red-emitting fluorogenic probe. Anal. Chem. 92 (5), 3613–3619. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04410

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, Y., Shi, W., Li, X., and Ma, H. (2022). Recent advances in fluorescent probes for lipid droplets. Chem. Commun. 58 (10), 1495–1509. doi:10.1039/d1cc05717k

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, Z., Zhang, T., Liu, H., Chen, Y., Kwok, R. T. K., Ma, C., et al. (2018). Bright near-infrared aggregation-induced emission luminogens with strong two-photon absorption, excellent organelle specificity, and efficient photodynamic therapy potential. ACS Nano 12 (8), 8145–8159. doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b03138

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: lipid droplet, lipid metabolism, organelle tracker, two-photon microscopy, live sample imaging

Citation: Lee DJ, Kim ES, Lee HW and Kim HM (2022) Advances in small molecule two-photon fluorescent trackers for lipid droplets in live sample imaging. Front. Chem. 10:1072143. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.1072143

Received: 17 October 2022; Accepted: 07 November 2022;
Published: 25 November 2022.

Edited by:

Lei Feng, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, China

Reviewed by:

Kang-Nan Wang, Shandong University, China
Lin Yuan, Hunan University, China
Pilhan Kim, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), South Korea

Copyright © 2022 Lee, Kim, Lee and Kim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hyo Won Lee, ZGFya2NoZW1pc3RAYWpvdS5hYy5rcg==; Hwan Myung Kim, a2ltaG1AYWpvdS5hYy5rcg==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.