Wei Ma
Mario A. Alpuche-Aviles
Qianjin Chen
Caleb M. Hill- 1Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Joint International Research Laboratory of Precision Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Feringa Nobel Prize Scientist Joint Research Center, Frontiers Science Center for Materiobiology and Dynamic Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
- 2Department of Chemistry, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States
- 3State Key Laboratory for Modification of Chemical Fibers and Polymer Materials, College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Donghua University, Shanghai, China
- 4Department of Chemistry, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, United States
Editorial on the Research Topic
Single-Entity Electrochemistry
Single-entity analysis is a holy grail in the analytical chemistry field. When the measurement scale is down to the single entity level, individuals usually exhibit different physical or chemical performance from the ensemble or bulk state. However, traditional measurements all focus on the bulk responses, which neglect the structure heterogeneities and obscure the intrinsic performance of individual entities (Baker, 2018). Recently, single-entity electrochemistry provides a powerful method in high-throughput detecting and characterizing individual entities, that is, nanoparticle, virus, nanobubble, even molecule and atom. Due to low cost, little sample consumption, and rapid and sensitive measurement, the fundamental research and practical application of single-entity electrochemistry has rapidly developed in recent decades (Crooks, 2016). Considering the transient nature and the ultralow amplitude of individual entities, a critical barrier of single-entity electrochemical measurement is obtaining the weak signals among the noise (Ma, et al., 2017). On the one hand, reducing the electrode size into a micro- or nanoscale is an effective way to lower the background noise and match the single analytes. On the other hand, the rapid development of low-noise electrochemical instruments allows accurately measuring the electrochemical signal of an individual with high temporal and current resolution.
As an emerging and convenient electrochemical method, stochastic collision electrochemistry has been used to investigate the intrinsic properties of individual entities, including size, shape, concentration, aggregation degree, and catalytic performance, during their stochastic collision at an ultramicroelectrode (Sun, et al., 2019). Thanks to the large data volume, the unavoidable background noise, and the filtering effect in single-entity electrochemical experiments, the accurate analysis of the current signal based on big data analysis is of great significance to efficiently access accurate information of individual events. In this research topic, Zhao et al. proposed a spike detection algorithm for automatically processing the data from the direct oxidation of silver nanoparticles in single-nanoparticle collision experiments, including baseline extraction, spike identification, and spike area integration.
The development of nanoelectrode offers an important advantage in spatial resolution for scanning electrochemical microscopy, scanning electrochemical cell microscopy, scanning ion conductance microscopy, etc (Kai, et al., 2018; Wahab, et al., 2020). The nanoscale imaging ability due to the high spatial resolution enables single-entity analysis to be more useful. Moreover, the state and expansion of the electrode, such as nanopore, nanopipette, nanoelectrode, microphase-separated block copolymer thin film, and others, have attracted considerable attention. Nanopore sensing is a powerful tool in single-entity electrochemical measurement due to the high sensitivity and versatility of this technique. It has been widely applied in detecting metal ions, small molecules, nucleotides and proteins in the past several decades, especially in DNA sequencing (Deamer, et al., 2016). In this Research Topic, the mini-review by Yang et al. focuses on the recent progress in the modification and characterization of TEM-fabricated nanopores. Moreover, some key applications of these nanopores are highlighted in nucleic acids, protein, and nanoparticle detection. Additionally, they discuss the future of computer simulations in DNA and protein sequencing strategies based on nanopore detection technology.
Interest in single-entity photoelectrochemical experiments arises from the need to understand the implications of materials under illumination at the nanometer scale. These photoelectrochemical processes are more challenging than the electrocatalytic reactions that operate in the absence of light. Furthermore, in the presence of light, materials’ behavior depends on several additional experimental features, for example, illumination power. Because of these different practical issues, progress on single-entity photoelectrochemistry has been slower than in other electrochemical areas. This topic includes two contributions that address the single-entity photoelectrochemistry. Mathuri et al. review the current literature of single-entity studies of semiconducting materials in the broader context of single-entity electrochemistry. Subedi et al. demonstrate the detection of colloidal CdSe and CdSe/ZnS QDs. The authors have observed the stepwise photocurrent vs. time response, which people in the field now take as the “signature” of the adsorption/desorption of single entities. Therefore, the materials CdSe and CdSe/ZnS irreversibly adsorb to the Pt ultramicroelectrode. However, the observed photocurrent is relatively large, > 1 pA, which indicates that the entities adsorbing to the UME are aggregates in this work. These results were consistent with lower collision frequencies than the diffusion-limited value expected for single QDs/UME interactions. Also, dynamic light scattering and scanning electron microscopy studies are consistent with the detection of agglomerates.
Nowadays, single-entity electrochemical measurement coupled with complementary techniques such as optical microscopy, plasmonic and Raman scattering techniques makes it possible to identify the full picture of single-NP electrochemical behaviors with sufficient information (Wang, et al., 2016). Two of the original research articles included here focus on the electrochemical behaviors at the individual nanoparticle level by combining other imaging techniques. Garcia et al. report on using a plasmonic electrochemical microscope to study the electrocatalytic reduction of Prussian blue nanoparticles for hydrogen peroxide at the individual nanoparticle level. On the other hand, Cashen et al. explore an optically detected electrochemical approach that uses a conventional bright-field optical microscope to acquire single-particle electrochemical data and ex situ TEM characterization of single nanoparticles in a one-to-one fashion. The results are significant for correlated electrochemical/TEM imaging studies that aim to reveal structure–property relationships using single particle–level imaging and ensemble-level electrochemistry.
Looking at current developments, we may foresee that single-entity electrochemistry is not only a commercial success in analytical applications but also a diverse tool to answer fundamental questions in chemistry, biology, and physics. The articles on this research topic show how the single-entity electrochemical application expands by combining electrochemical measurement with in situ and in operando imaging techniques. These measurements will be helpful to further understand the intrinsic properties of individual entities to critical electron transfer processes occurring at the micro-/nano-interface.
Author Contributions
WM composed and wrote the editorial, and MA co-wrote the Editorial, while QC and CH reviewed it. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the authors and reviewers for their valuable input to this research topic and editorial office of the journal for giving us the opportunity to guest edit this collection and for their professional assistance. Finally, we hope readers will enjoy this article collection as much as we have.
References
Baker, L. A. (2018). Perspective and Prospectus on Single-Entity Electrochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 15549–15559. doi:10.1021/jacs.8b09747
Crooks, R. M. (2016). Concluding Remarks: Single Entity Electrochemistry One Step at a Time. Faraday Discuss. 193, 533–547. doi:10.1039/C6FD00203J
Deamer, D., Akeson, M., and Branton, D. (2016). Three Decades of Nanopore Sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 518–524. doi:10.1038/nbt.3423
Kai, T., Zoski, C. G., and Bard, A. J. (2018). Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy at the Nanometer Level. Chem. Commun. 54, 1934–1947. doi:10.1039/C7CC09777H
Ma, W., Ma, H., Chen, J.-F., Peng, Y.-Y., Yang, Z.-Y., Wang, H.-F., et al. (2017). Tracking Motion Trajectories of Individual Nanoparticles Using Time-Resolved Current Traces. Chem. Sci. 8, 1854–1861. doi:10.1039/C6SC04582K
Sun, Z., Hafez, M. E., Ma, W., and Long, Y.-T. (2019). Recent Advances in Nanocollision Electrochemistry. Sci. China Chem. 62, 1588–1600. doi:10.1007/s11426-019-9529-x
Wahab, O. J., Kang, M., and Unwin, P. R. (2020). Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy: A Natural Technique for Single Entity Electrochemistry. Curr. Opin. Electrochemistry. 22, 120–128. doi:10.1016/j.coelec.2020.04.018
Keywords: single entity, nanoelectrochemistry, single nanoparticle photoelectrochemistry, nanopore sensing, big data analysis
Citation: Ma W, Alpuche-Aviles MA, Chen Q and Hill CM (2021) Editorial: Single-Entity Electrochemistry. Front. Chem. 9:812273. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.812273
Received: 10 November 2021; Accepted: 10 November 2021;
Published: 09 December 2021.
Edited and reviewed by:
Nosang Vincent Myung, University of Notre Dame, United StatesCopyright © 2021 Ma, Alpuche-Aviles, Chen and Hill. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Wei Ma, d2VpbWFAZWN1c3QuZWR1LmNu