Porphyrin Photoabsorption and Fluorescence Variation with Adsorptive Loading on Gold Nanoparticles

Here, we report the photophysical structure–property relationship of porphyrins adsorbed on gold nanoparticles. The number of porphyrin–alkanethiolate adsorbates per particle was adjusted by a post-synthetic thiol/thiolate exchange reaction on 1-dodecanethiolate–protected gold nanoparticles. Even with a low loading level of adsorbates (<10% of all thiolate sites on gold nanoparticles), the shoulder absorption at the Soret band was intensified, indicating the formation of aggregates of porphyrin adsorbates on the nanoparticles. Steady-state fluorescence quantum yields could be adjusted by the bulkiness of substituents at the meso-positions of the porphyrin or the methylene linker chain length, regardless of the porphyrin loading level and the nanoparticle diameter.

1 Introduction

The design of dye molecules with specific photophysical properties is necessary for many applications including optoelectronics, photocatalysis, and bioimaging (Lu and Nakanishi, 2019; Watanabe et al., 2019; Sato, 2020; Han et al., 2021). Various approaches to customize the properties of such dyes have been explored, based on the thorough investigation of the photophysical structure–property relationship (Shin and Lee, 2002; Benniston et al., 2003; Kovaliov et al., 2014; Kulinich et al., 2016). Despite these efforts, fine-tuning the properties that are intrinsic to the electronic structure of dyes remains challenging because the molecular design approach enables only stepwise adjustments.

One of the alternative approaches to adjusting the photophysical properties is to conjugate dyes and metal nanoparticles (Dulkeith et al., 2002; Doering and Nie, 2003; Pan et al., 2006; Hasobe, 2021). Nanoparticles are usually defined as particles with a diameter between ∼1 and ∼100 nm (Kreibig and Vollmer, 1995). In this size range, the chemical, photophysical, and electrical properties differ dramatically in comparison with the bulk counterparts (Glotov et al., 2019). For practical applications, gold is one of the few appropriate candidates, due to its chemical inertness. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), often protected with alkanethiolate groups as developed by Brust et al.(Brust et al., 1994) in the past quarter of a century, are widely employed for this purpose because of their extraordinary redispersibility (Thomas and Kamat, 2003). The alkanethiolate adsorbates can readily be replaced with other thiolates by thiol/thiolate exchange reactions to obtain AuNPs modified by incoming adsorbates. Additional desired functional properties such as the solubility, charge, and affinity with other molecules can be added or amended by successive or coincident adsorbate exchange reactions to afford multifunctional nanoparticles (Ingram et al., 1997).

Porphyrins and their analogs have potential applications in many fields—sensing, catalysis, and photovoltaics, for example—so have attracted interest in their unique photophysics, including huge absorption coefficients of ∼5 × 10⁵ M⁻¹ cm⁻¹ (Kubo et al., 2003; Kinoshita et al., 2012; Barona–Castaño et al., 2016; Ghosh et al., 2019). Thorough investigations on the photophysics of porphyrin–AuNP conjugates have been conducted. For instance, Akiyama et al. reported photocurrent enhancement in porphyrin–AuNP conjugates by a localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR)–enhanced electromagnetic field (Akiyama et al., 2006). Imahori et al. reported the fluorescence lifetime of porphyrin adsorbates on AuNPs was significantly longer than those on a two-dimensional Au substrate (Imahori et al., 2001). The general strategy for the adjustment of photophysical properties of dye–AuNP conjugates involves altering the size and shape of the nanoparticles and the length of the linkers (Imahori et al., 1998; Dulkeith et al., 2005; Hong and Li, 2013; Do and Imae, 2021). However, less attention has been paid to the number of adsorbates loaded per particle, despite the strong influence on photophysical properties (Shinohara and Shinmori, 2016).

Here, we present the photophysical properties of porphyrin adsorbates on AuNPs having different loading levels, substituents on the meso-positions of porphyrin, lengths of alkanethiolate linkers, and nanoparticle diameters. Porphyrin–AuNP conjugates, with the adsorbate loading levels of up to 10% of all available thiolate sites, were obtained by post-synthetic thiol/thiolate exchange reactions employing 1-dodecanethiolate–protected AuNPs as the precursors. By characterizing conjugates with various loading levels, we have identified the factors that determine the photoabsorption and fluorescence properties of porphyrin adsorbates on the AuNPs.

2 Results and Discussion

2.1 Synthesis of Porphyrin–Gold Nanoparticle Conjugates

We employed three types of 1-dodecanethiolate–protected AuNPs A–C which have different diameters and distributions (A: 2.5 ± 0.5, B: 2.5 ± 0.9, and C: 5.6 ± 2.2 nm). The 2.5-nm species (A and B) showed weak LSPR around 510 nm (Figure 1), while the resonance was distinct for the 5.6-nm species C at 516 nm (Jin, 2010). Four porphyrin–alkanethiols, three with different methylene linker chain lengths (1a–c, n = 2, 5, and 10) and one with bulkier substituents at three meso-positions of porphyrin (2, n = 5) were chosen as adsorbates (Scheme 1). Compound 2 was synthesized using a route similar to those of 1a–c, as previously reported (Scheme 2) (Shinohara and Shinmori, 2016).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. UV-vis extinction spectra (in toluene) of (A) 1b@A and (B) 2@A prepared by post-synthetic modification of nanoparticle A with different initial concentrations of porphyrin–alkanethiols (c₀). Insets represent the normalized absorption spectra of porphyrin adsorbates.

SCHEME 1

SCHEME 1. (A) Chemical structure of porphyrin–alkanethiols 1a-c and 2; (B) post-synthetic loading of porphyrin–alkanethiols on 1-dodecanethiolate-protected AuNPs.

SCHEME 2

SCHEME 2. Synthetic route to porphyrin–alkanethiol 2 with bulky tert-butyl substituents.

The post-synthetic modification of 1-dodecanethiolate–protected AuNPs, namely, thiol/thiolate exchange reaction, was performed by mixing with porphyrin–alkanethiols in toluene, followed by purification by gel permeation chromatography to remove unreacted porphyrin–alkanethiols. Hereafter, the porphyrin–AuNP conjugates are denoted as porphyrin–alkanethiolate@AuNPs. 1a–c@B and 1a–c@C that we previously prepared (Shinohara and Shinmori, 2016) were used for the photophysical characterization of the conjugates. The procedure of the thiol/thiolate exchange reaction was slightly modified for the synthesis of 1b@A and 2@A, where the initial concentrations of porphyrin–alkanethiols were adjusted (c₀ = 15–50 mM) under a constant concentration of the AuNPs, and the reaction time extended to obtain samples with different loading levels. The range of loaded porphyrin–alkanethiolate adsorbates per particle (N) were determined to be 1.2–3.1 (1b@A) and 1.5–5.5 (2@A) of 126 total thiolate sites (Terrill et al., 1995), respectively. Detailed procedures for the synthesis of A, 2, 1b@A, and 2@A and the determination of N are given in the Experimental Section.

2.2 UV-Vis Extinction Spectra

The UV-vis extinction spectra of 1b@A and 2@A (n = 5, 2.5 ± 0.5 nm) in toluene are shown in Figure 1. Both the conjugates exhibit the weak LSPR band of the AuNPs around 510 nm, B band (Soret band) around 420 nm, and four Q bands in the range of 500–700 nm. The spectra indicate the successful loading of porphyrin–alkanethiolates on the AuNPs. The five absorption maxima of porphyrin adsorbates were red-shifted up to 4 nm (Supplementary Tables S1, S2) compared with those of the corresponding porphyrin–alkanethiols (1b and 2, Supplementary Figure S1). A similar bathochromic effect is also observed in other dye–nanoparticle conjugates (Prasanna et al., 2014; Ashjari et al., 2015).

While the extinction spectra of porphyrin–alkanethiols for 1b and 2 are almost identical (Supplementary Figure S1), the absorption features of porphyrin adsorbates on the AuNP show different trends. It should be noted that shoulder growth on the shorter wavelength side of the Soret band around 405 nm was observed, which could be consistent with the blue-shifted absorption band arising from H-aggregate exciton formation (Eisfeld and Briggs, 2006). The vertical molecular orientation of the porphyrins on the AuNPs through Au–S covalent bonds allows face-to-face aggregations between neighboring porphyrin adsorbates. This is in contrast to the edge-to-edge J-aggregation of the porphyrin adsorbates on AuNPs using multivalent linking, where red-shifted shoulder growth is observed (Kanehara et al., 2008; Ohyama et al., 2009). No observable shoulder growth was found in the Q bands, as predicted by Kasha’s theory that chromophores with a higher molar absorption coefficient show stronger exciton couplings (Kasha, 1976).

We qualified the aggregation of porphyrin adsorbates on AuNPs by the ratio of the molar absorption coefficients of the shoulder (∼405 nm) to the Soret band (∼420 nm), ${\epsilon }_{\text{shoulder}}/{\epsilon }_{\text{Soret}}$ (Figure 2A, Supplementary Tables S3, S4). The shoulder growth of 1b@A with increasing N strongly indicates the formation of face-to-face H-aggregates (Figure 2B). A significantly slower shoulder growth rate of 2@A likely results from the steric effect of the bulky aryl groups at meso-positions. The aryl groups that substitute the meso-positions of the porphyrin have a large dihedral angle (60–90°) from the porphyrin π plane (Rayati et al., 2008). Therefore, the introduction of the bulky tert-butyl groups at the 3 and 5 positions of the aryl groups increase their face-to-face distances in the H-aggregates and therefore weaken the exciton coupling (Imahori et al., 2004a).

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. (A) Spectral deconvolution of the Soret band and shoulder into two Gaussian curves. (B) The relative shoulder intensity (${\epsilon }_{\text{shoulder}}/{\epsilon }_{\text{Soret}}$) of porphyrin adsorbates with different numbers of porphyrin–alkanethiolate adsorbates per particle (N).

In these conjugates, only a small fraction of the 1-dodecanethiolate sites were exchanged for porphyrin–alkanethiolate (see 2.1). It may seem strange that the porphyrin adsorbates form the aggregates on the AuNPs, despite their low loading level. It is known that the Au–S covalent adsorbates on the AuNPs dynamically migrate. This enables the self-assembly of adsorbates on the AuNPs when the formation of aggregates is thermodynamically favored (Werts et al., 2004; Tanaka et al., 2006). The aggregation tendency of porphyrins by π–π stacking may contribute to the self-assembly of porphyrins on the AuNPs. Also, the amide bond that links the porphyrin moiety is another functional group that can contribute to the aggregation via hydrogen bonds. Such an electrostatic interaction would provide a dominant cohesive force compared with π–π stacking in the nonpolar environment (i.e., in toluene) (Pérez–Rentero et al., 2014) and so help one porphyrin adsorbate access an adjacent porphyrin adsorbate followed by aggregation (Sanz et al., 2012).

The broadening of the Soret band (i.e., the increase in the full width at half maximum (FWHM)) was also remarkable in 1b@A but not in 2@A. Interestingly, unlike the shoulder growth, which depends on N, the FWHM only shows a slight expansion according to the increase in N (1b: 12.2 nm, 2: 11.3 nm, 1b@A: 17.0–18.5 nm, and 2@A: 14.2–15.1 nm, Supplementary Tables S3, S4). It has been shown, in other systems, that the broadening of the absorption band, which is also observed in chromophores adsorbed on two-dimensional Au substrates, arises from interactions between chromophores and other molecules (e.g., other adsorbates or solvent) and is independent of exciton coupling (Leontidis et al., 1995). The porphyrin adsorbates can interact with not only the AuNPs and other porphyrins but also the remaining 1-dodecanethiolate adsorbates. Although the formation of porphyrin aggregates seems to result in this broadening, in the case of 1b@A, the effect of loading level (i.e., the number of possible porphyrin–porphyrin interactions) is much smaller (18.5–17.0 = 1.5 nm) than other effects (17.0–12.2 = 4.8 nm) associated with the porphyrin loading onto the AuNPs. The smaller broadening for 2@A (15.1–14.2 = 0.9 nm of the effect of a loading level, and 14.2–11.3 = 2.9 nm of other effects) indicates that the bulky tert-butyl substituents inhibit not only porphyrin–porphyrin interactions but also interactions with other molecules (e.g., 1-dodecanethiolate adsorbates).

2.3 Steady-State Fluorescence Spectra and Fluorescence Quantum Yields

The steady-state fluorescence spectra of 1b@A and 2@A with various N are shown in Figure 3. Two characteristic emission bands were observed at 658 nm and 721–722 nm, respectively (Supplementary Tables S1, S2) (Akimoto et al., 1999). Emission maxima (λ_em) were slightly red-shifted on loading (λ_em: 1b: 654 and 720 nm and 2: 655 and 721 nm) but not affected by N, which is similar to the tendency of the absorption spectra. The fluorescence of the porphyrin adsorbates on the AuNPs is almost quenched (fluorescence quantum yields Φ_F = 0.07–0.14% (1b@A), 0.13–0.25% (2@A), Figure 4) compared to the absence of AuNPs (Φ_F = 11% (1b), 12% (2)). Such strong quenching of the fluorescence by the AuNPs is broadly found in various fluorophores such as pyrene, anthracene, and rhodamine 6G (Uznański et al., 2009; Kabb et al., 2015; Shaikh et al., 2015).

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. Steady-state fluorescence spectra of (A) 1b@A and (B) 2@A in toluene (saturated with air at pO₂ = ca. 0.21 atm, λ_ex = 515 nm). Insets show fluorescence intensity at 659 nm (I₆₅₉, Q_(0–0) band) versus N.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. Fluorescence quantum yields (Φ_F) of 1b@A and 2@A with different N.

It is known that most fluorophores are non-fluorescent in H-aggregates, in contrast to J-aggregates which exhibit fluorescence (Liu et al., 2015). In present conjugates, excited porphyrin adsorbates can be quenched not only by the AuNPs but also by the adjacent porphyrin adsorbates. However, Φ_F is nearly independent of N (Figure 4), unlike the singlet oxygen quantum yields (Φ_Δ), which decreases exponentially as N increases (Shinohara and Shinmori, 2016). This fact indicates that the porphyrin–porphyrin energy transfer is not the dominant pathway for the quenching of fluorescence in the conjugates. Statistical analysis showed Φ_F of 2@A (0.15 ± 0.02) is higher than that of 1b@A (0.10 ± 0.02%) upon removing the outlier at N = 2.6 that fell more than two standard deviations (SD) above the mean (Table 1; the results of statistical rejection and significance tests are shown in Supplementary Tables S5, S6). Another potential factor that influences quench efficiency is the spatial freedom of the adsorbates. In this regard, bulky substituents inhibit aggregation and increase the spatial degree of freedom of porphyrin fluorophore, resulting in reduced energy transfer efficiency from porphyrin adsorbates to AuNPs (Best et al., 2007).

TABLE 1

TABLE 1. Average fluorescence quantum yields (Φ_F) of porphyrin adsorbates on AuNPs with different diameters and size distributions.

2.4 Effects of Linker Chain Length and Nanoparticle Size on Fluorescence

The porphyrin–AuNP conjugates 1a–c@B and 1a–c@C were synthesized as described and determined to have N ranges 3–15 (126 total thiolate sites) and 9–43 (632 total thiolate sites), respectively (spectral and statistical data are shown in Supplementary Figures S3–S6 and Supplementary Tables S6–S19). The ε_shoulder/ε_Soret increases with N on both nanoparticles but shows a non-monotonic trend with the length of the side chain (1b > 1c > 1a, Supplementary Figure S4A,B). As mentioned before, the space around the porphyrin becomes larger with the lengthening of the linker and smaller with the tendency of the adsorbate to aggregate. Based on this idea, the aggregation should be the strongest for 1a (n = 2), but it was not in the results. Steric repulsion between the adsorbents is expected to be one of the factors that determine the aggregation formation in the successive adsorptive loading. One particular consideration in the adsorptive loading onto the nanoparticles to form three-dimensional monolayers is the curvature of the substrate surface. At the same curvature, the shorter linkers increase the porphyrin–porphyrin steric repulsion, which is thought to inhibit the formation of aggregates (Terrill et al., 1995) (Supplementary Figure S7A,B). The steric hindrance may also reduce the thiolate density on the gold surface, making such monolayers thermodynamically unfavorable (Ingram et al., 1997). The universal trend in the shoulder growth in adsorbates 1b (n = 5) and 1c (n = 10), which is independent of the particle size, was found (Supplementary Figure S4C). This fact supports our hypothesis: in the adsorptive loading, porphyrins are preferentially loaded next to the already introduced adsorbates and form aggregates. On the other hand, in 1a (n = 2), the universal trend was no longer held. This deviation suggests that the aggregation in 1a on the larger nanoparticles C, due to the π–π stacking and/or the hydrogen bonds between the amide groups, with a small curvature is thermodynamically unfavorable (Supplementary Figure S7C,D). Imahori et al.(Imahori et al., 2000) reported that for tetraarylporphyrin–amide–alkanethiolate (the same structure as the present system), the porphyrin plane is oriented perpendicular to the two-dimensional Au substrate surface when n is an odd number, which is preferable to form H-aggregates (Supplementary Figure S8A). When n is an even number, the porphyrin plane is tilted toward the substrate surface, resulting in weaker exciton coupling by H-aggregation (Supplementary Figure S8B). The competitive effects on the aggregation strength are considered to result in the non-monotonic tendency.

The average Φ_F of the conjugates is shown in Table 1. In both series of conjugates, Φ_F slightly increased with methylene linker chain length (n = 2, 5, and 10). Note that no significant difference was found between n = 2 and 5 (Supplementary Table S6), which is considered to be due to the large variance of n = 2 (SD = 0.03–0.04%). Strong aggregation at n = 5 (odd number) is likely to contribute to the reduction in the fluorescence quantum yield, however is not, as evidenced by the lack of dependence on N. This is consistent with previous reports of an increasing donor–acceptor distance reducing quenching efficiency (Rao and Mayor, 2005; Deng et al., 2019). In addition, similar to the effect of bulky substituents, lengthening of the linker chain increases the space around the end groups (i.e., porphyrin adsorbates) and may inhibit the quenching of fluorescence (Badia et al., 1996). There are numerous reports on LSPR-induced fluorescence enhancement, as well as the enhancement of photoabsorption, Raman scattering (Chung et al., 2011; Bauch et al., 2014; Zvyagina et al., 2018), and singlet oxygen generation (Shinohara and Shinmori, 2016); however, no statistically significant difference was found between the LSPR-silent (1a–c@B) and LSPR-active (1a–c@C) conjugates (Supplementary Table S6). This can be attributed to the fact that the quenching process, which depends on the porphyrin–nanoparticle distance, is dominant in the range of linker chain lengths (n = 2–10).

3 Experimental Section

3.1 General

All starting materials and reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. Spectroscopic-grade toluene was saturated with air (partial pressure of oxygen pO₂ = ca. 0.21 atm) before use.

3.2 Apparatus

UV–vis spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrometer equipped with a Peltier temperature controller. Steady-state fluorescence spectra were recorded on a JASCO FP-5300 fluorospectrometer equipped with a temperature controller. Obtained spectra were corrected by referencing to a tungsten sub-reference lamp (JASCO). ¹H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE DPX400 spectrometer (9.4 T) at ambient temperature in deuterated chloroform containing ca. 0.03% (v/v) tetramethylsilane as an internal standard (δ = 0.00 ppm). TEM images were obtained using an FEI Tecnai Osiris field emission transmission electron microscope with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV.

3.3 Synthesis

3.3.1 Gold Nanoparticles A (2.5 ± 0.5 nm)

The title nanoparticles A were synthesized by one-phase method reported in the literature (Zheng et al., 2006). To a solution of chloro(triphenylphosphine)gold(I) (Braunstein et al., 2007) (250 mg, 0.505 mmol) and 1-dodecanethiol (250 mg, 1.24 mmol) in chloroform (12.5 ml), borane tert-butylamine complex (423 mg, 4.86 mmol) in chloroform/ethanol (12.5 ml/5 ml) was added. After 24 h of stirring at ambient temperature, the mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure, and ethanol (40 ml) was added. The precipitate was collected by centrifugation and repeatedly washed with ethanol under sonication to remove starting materials and other byproducts to obtain A as a black waxy solid (61 mg). The mean diameter and size distribution (a standard deviation) were determined to be 2.5 and 0.5 nm, respectively, by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Supplementary Figure S2).

3.3.2 5-(4-Nitrophenyl)-10,15,20-tris(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)porphyrin (3)

Pyrrole (2.19 ml, 30.0 mmol), 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (1.14 g, 7.5 mmol), and 3,5-di-tert-butylbenzaldehyde (Schuster et al., 2006) (4.92 g, 22.5 mmol) were dissolved in methylene chloride (3 L) and purged with nitrogen for 15 min. To the solution, trifluoroacetic acid (4.44 ml, 60.0 mmol) was added, and the mixture was stirred for 1 h in the dark before neutralization by the addition of triethylamine (14.4 ml, 22.8 mmol). To the mixture, p-chloranil (5.52 g, 22.8 mmol) was added, and the solution was stirred for 3 h at ambient temperature. After the removal of the solvent under reduced pressure, the residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, hexane:methylene chloride = 2:1), followed by recrystallization (methylene chloride/methanol) to obtain 3 as purple crystals (1.23 g, 16%). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃, SiMe₄, 294 K): δ/ppm −2.70 (2H, brs, inner NH), 1.51–1.55 (54H, m, CH₃), 7.80 (1H, t, J = 1.7 Hz, benzene), 7.81 (2H, t, J = 1.7 Hz, benzene), 8.08 (2H, d, J = 1.8 Hz, benzene), 8.08 (4H, d, J = 1.8 Hz, benzene), 8.43 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, benzene), 8.64 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, benzene), 8.74 (2H, d, J = 4.7 Hz, pyrrole), and 8.90–8.97 (6H, m, pyrrole).

3.3.3 5-(4-Aminophenyl)-10,15,20-tris(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)porphyrin (4)

To a dispersion of 3 (1.39 g, 1.40 mmol) in concentrated hydrochloric acid (50 ml), stannous chloride dihydrate (1.90 g, 8.40 mmol) was added, and the suspension was stirred for 12 h at 70°C. The mixture was neutralized by the addition of sodium carbonate and extracted with methylene chloride. The organic layer was washed with water and brine, dried over sodium sulfate, then concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel and dichloromethane) and then recrystallized from methylene chloride/methanol to obtain 4 as purple crystals (0.29 g, 21%). The majority of 3 was unreacted, apparently due to its low solubility. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃, SiMe₄, 296 K): δ/ppm −2.69, (2H, brs, inner NH), 1.50–1.55 (54H, m, CH₃), 4.02 (brs, 2H, NH₂), 7.06 (2H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, benzene), 7.78 (1H, t, J = 1.7 Hz, benzene), 7.79 (2H, t, J = 1.7 Hz, benzene), 8.01 (2H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, benzene), 8.07 (2H, d, J = 1.7 Hz, benzene) 8.09 (4H, d, J = 1.7 Hz, benzene), 8.82–8.92 (6H, m, pyrrole), and 8.94 (2H, d, J = 4.6 Hz, pyrrole).

3.3.4 6-Bromo-N-{4-[10,15,20-tris(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)porphyrin-5-yl]phenyl}hexanamide (5)

To a mixture of ε-bromocaproic acid (ca. 10 eq.) and N,N-dimethylformamide (1 drop) in toluene, excess thionyl chloride was added. After 1 h of stirring at ambient temperature, the mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was redissolved in toluene and concentrated again to obtain ε-bromocaproyl chloride as yellow oil, which was subjected to the following reaction without purification.

An ice-cold mixture of 4 (50.0 mg, 0.0517 mmol) and dry pyridine (0.1 ml) in dry methylene chloride (5 ml), ε-bromocaproyl chloride (ca. 10 eq.) in dry methylene chloride was added dropwise. After 1 h of stirring, the mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain crude 5 as purple solid. This material was subjected to the following reaction without further purification.

3.3.5 6-Acetylthio-N-{4-[10,15,20-tris(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)porphyrin-5-yl]phenyl}hexanamide (6)

Crude 5 was dissolved in bench N,N-dimethylformamide, and potassium thioacetate (50 mg, 0.44 mmol) was added at 0°C. After 1 h of stirring at ambient temperature, the mixture was diluted with methylene chloride (40 ml) and washed with water. The organic layer was dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel and methylene chloride) and subsequent reprecipitation from methylene chloride/methanol to obtain 6 as purple solid. 49 mg (83% from 4). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃, SiMe₄, 296 K): δ/ppm −2.71 (2H, brs, inner NH), 1.50–1.56 (54H, m, CH₃), 1.58 (2H, quint, J = 7.0 Hz, CH₂), 1.72 (2H, quint, J = 7.3 Hz, CH₂), 1.91 (2H, quint, J = 7.5 Hz, CH₂), 2.54 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, NHCOCH₂), 2.96 (2H, t, J = 7.3 Hz, AcSCH₂), 7.56 (1H, brs, NHCO), 7.78 (1H, t, J = 1.6 Hz, benzene), 7.79 (2H, t, J = 1.6 Hz, benzene), 7.91 (2H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, benzene), 8.07 (2H, d, J = 1.7 Hz, benzene), 8.08 (4H, d, J = 1.7 Hz, benzene), 8.19 (2H, d, J = 8.3 Hz, benzene), 8.86 (2H, d, J = 4.6 Hz, pyrrole), and 8.87–8.92 (6H, m, pyrrole).

3.3.6 6-Mercapto-N-{4-[10,15,20-tris(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)porphyrin-5-yl]phenyl}hexanamide (2)

The title compound 2 was synthesized according to the method reported in the literature (Imahori et al., 2004b). To a solution of 6 (34.0 mg, 0.0299 mmol) in degassed tetrahydrofuran (1 ml), potassium hydroxide (30 mg, 0.53 mmol) was added in degassed methanol (1 ml) and the mixture refluxed for 15 min under nitrogen. The mixture was neutralized by the addition of acetic acid (0.1 ml) and then concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel and methylene chloride) and subsequent reprecipitation from methylene chloride/methanol to obtain 2 as purple solid. 22 mg (66%). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃, SiMe₄, and 296 K): δ/ppm −2.70 (2H, brs, inner NH), 1.41 (1H, t, J = 7.8 Hz, SH), 1.51–1.55 (54H, m, CH₃), 1.60 (2H, quint, J = 7.1 Hz, CH₂), 1.75 (2H, quint, J = 7.3 Hz, CH₂), 1.88 (2H, quint, J = 7.5 Hz, CH₂), 2.52 (2H, t, J = 7.4 Hz, NHCOCH₂), 2.62 (2H, q, J = 7.2 Hz, HSCH₂), 7.43 (1H, brs, NHCO), 7.78 (1H, t, J = 1.8 Hz, benzene), 7.79 (2H, t, J = 1.8 Hz, benzene), 7.90 (2H, d, J = 8.3 Hz, benzene), 8.07 (2H, d, J = 1.8 Hz, benzene), 8.08 (4H, d, J = 1.9 Hz, benzene), 8.15–8.19 (2H, d, 8.4 Hz, benzene), 8.85 (2H, d, J = 4.7 Hz, pyrrole), and 8.87–8.93 (6H, m, pyrrole).

3.3.7 Porphyrin–AuNP conjugates (1a@A and 2@A)

The solution of A (1 mg/ml = 9.6 μM, assuming the chemical formula of Au₄₀₀(C₁₂H₂₅S)₁₂₆ = 1.04 × 10⁵ Da (Terrill et al., 1995)) and porphyrin–alkanethiol (i.e., 1b or 2, 15–50 mM) in toluene (1 ml), was allowed to equilibrate for 24 h at ambient temperature. The mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure at ambient temperature using a centrifugal evaporator (EYELA CVE-2000 equipped with a common oil rotary vacuum pump). The residue was purified twice by size exclusion chromatography (BioBeads S-X1, toluene) to remove unreacted porphyrin–alkanethiol.

3.4 UV-Vis Extinction Spectra

Purified porphyrin–AuNP conjugates were dissolved in toluene to achieve an absorbance at 515 nm of 0.20 ± 0.01 [−], and extinction spectra were recorded. The same solution was subjected to fluorescence measurement (vide infra).

The molar extinction coefficients (ε) of AuNPs are related to their size and surface dielectric constant (Huang and El-Sayed, 2010). In the thiol/thiolate exchange reaction, no significant size change occurs, or even if it does occur, its effect is negligible (Hostetler et al., 1999). The surface dielectric constant mainly reflects the structure of the adsorbates, but since both the original 1-dodecanethiolate and the porphyrin–alkanethiolate are similar, the surface dielectric constants are unlikely to change. Assuming that the porphyrin–alkanethiolate adsorbates are also not affected by the AuNPs, the extinction spectrum of the porphyrin–AuNP conjugates can be considered as the sum of the extinction spectra of the 1-dodecanethiolate–protected AuNPs and the porphyrin–alkanethiol.

Based on this assumption, the extinction spectra of porphyrin–AuNP conjugates were deconvoluted using the following equation (Shinohara and Shinmori, 2016; Shinohara et al., 2020):

$A\left(\lambda \right)=a\times {\epsilon }_{\text{Por}}\left(\lambda \right)+b\times {\epsilon }_{\text{AuNP}}\left(\lambda \right)+R\left(\lambda \right).(1)$

Here, A(λ) is the actual extinction spectrum of porphyrin–AuNP conjugates. ε_Por(λ) and ε_AuNP(λ) are the separately measured molar absorption coefficients of porphyrin–alkanethiol (1a–c or 2) and 1-dodecanethiolate-protected AuNPs (A–C), respectively. The proportional coefficients a and b were determined by the non-linear least-squares method (300 ≦ λ ≦ 800 nm), and the residue R(λ) was obtained. Finally, to obtain the number of porphyrin–alkanethiolate adsorbates per particle (N), as the quotient of the coefficients a and b, the following equation was used:

$N=a/b.(2)$

To qualify the aggregation of porphyrin adsorbates on AuNPs, ε_Por(λ) was further deconvoluted into two Gaussian functions, and the relative intensity of shoulder to the Soret band (${\epsilon }_{\text{shoulder}}/{\epsilon }_{\text{Soret}}$) was obtained (Supplementary Tables S3, S4, S13–S18).

3.5 Fluorescence Spectra

Five milliliters of the solution of porphyrin–AuNP conjugates, used for the extinction spectra measurement (absorbance at 515 nm–0.2), was volumetrically diluted by toluene to make 50 ml. The absorbance of the solution was reduced to below 0.02 (>95% transmittance) in the measurement range, to ensure the elimination of reabsorption of fluorescence by the sample itself. Φ_F was determined by the following equation (Zhang et al., 2014):

${\mathit{\Phi }}_{\text{F}}={\mathit{\Phi }}_{\text{F},\text{ref}}\times \frac{A_{\text{ref}}}{A}\times \frac{S}{S_{\text{ref}}},(3)$

where Φ_F,ref shows Φ_F of meso-tetraphenylporphyrin (10^–8 M, Φ_F,ref = 0.11 (Seybold and Gouterman, 1969)) as an external standard, and A and S show absorbance of porphyrin adsorbates at an excitation wavelength (515 nm) and the area of fluorescence spectra (600–800 nm), respectively.

4 Conclusion

In this work, a series of porphyrin–alkanethiols that have different linker chain lengths and substituents were loaded on the AuNPs by the post-synthetic thiol/thiolate exchange reaction. The conditions of the reaction were optimized to obtain low loading levels of total thiolate sites on the AuNPs. The conjugates retain the unique photoabsorption features of porphyrin (the Soret band and Q band) after loading. Slight red-shift, shoulder growth, and broadening were observed in the Soret band but not in the Q bands. Interestingly, porphyrin adsorbates form H-aggregates soon after the onset of the thiol/thiolate exchange reaction. Fluorescence in the adsorbates was determined to be strongly quenched, due to intraparticle energy transfer from the excited adsorbates to the AuNPs. Contrary to our hypothesis, the aggregation contributes little to the fluorescence quenching. Fluorescence quantum yields are affected by linker chain length but neither by the loading level nor nanoparticle diameter, unlike our previous report on the singlet oxygen quantum yields. Thus, this work has advanced our understanding of the photophysical properties of dye adsorbates on AuNPs.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author Contributions

AS conducted the majority of experiments. AS and GS analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. TN and HS are joint principal investigators; they conceived the work and designed the experiments. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Funding

We gratefully acknowledge the support of this study by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP21K04674 (HS).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Chihiro Mochizuki (UY) and Chiaya Yamamoto (UY) for their assistance with the transmission electron microscopy and Dr. Edward A. Neal (NIMS) for reading the manuscript and providing pedantic feedback. Funding was received for open access publication fees is from NIMS.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2021.777041/full#supplementary-material

References

Akimoto, S., Yamazaki, T., Yamazaki, I., and Osuka, A. (1999). Excitation Relaxation of Zinc and Free-Base Porphyrin Probed by Femtosecond Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 309, 177–182. doi:10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00688-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Akiyama, T., Nakada, M., Terasaki, N., and Yamada, S. (2006). Photocurrent Enhancement in a Porphyrin-Gold Nanoparticle Nanostructure Assisted by Localized Plasmon Excitation. Chem. Commun., 395–397. doi:10.1039/B511487J

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ashjari, M., Dehfuly, S., Fatehi, D., Shabani, R., and Koruji, M. (2015). Efficient Functionalization of Gold Nanoparticles Using Cysteine Conjugated Protoporphyrin IX for Singlet Oxygen Production In Vitro. RSC Adv. 5, 104621–104628. doi:10.1039/C5RA15862A

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Badia, A., Singh, S., Demers, L., Cuccia, L., Brown, G. R., and Lennox, R. B. (1996). Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold Nanoparticles. Chem. Eur. J. 2, 359–363. doi:10.1002/chem.19960020318

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barona-Castaño, J., Carmona-Vargas, C., Brocksom, T., and de Oliveira, K. (2016). Porphyrins as Catalysts in Scalable Organic Reactions. Molecules 21, 310. doi:10.3390/molecules21030310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bauch, M., Toma, K., Toma, M., Zhang, Q., and Dostalek, J. (2014). Plasmon-Enhanced Fluorescence Biosensors: a Review. Plasmonics 9, 781–799. doi:10.1007/s11468-013-9660-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Benniston, A. C., Davies, M., Harriman, A., and Sams, C. (2003). Photophysical Properties of a Supramolecular Interlocked Conjugate. J. Phys. Chem. A. 107, 4669–4675. doi:10.1021/jp034147z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Best, R. B., Merchant, K. A., Gopich, I. V., Schuler, B., Bax, A., and Eaton, W. A. (2007). Effect of Flexibility and Cis Residues in Single-Molecule FRET Studies of Polyproline. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 18964–18969. doi:10.1073/pnas.0709567104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Braunstein, P., Lehner, H., Matt, D., Burgess, K., and Ohlmeyer, M. J. (2007). A Platinum-Gold Cluster: Chloro-1κCl -Bis(Triethylphosphine-1κ P)Bis(Triphenyl- Phosphine)-2κ P, 3κP-Triangulo - Digold-Platinum(1 +) Trifluoromethanesulfonate. Inorg. Synth. 27, 218–221. doi:10.1002/9780470132586.ch42

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brust, M., Walker, M., Bethell, D., Schiffrin, D. J., and Whyman, R. (1994). Synthesis of Thiol-Derivatised Gold Nanoparticles in a Two-phase Liquid-Liquid System. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 801–802. doi:10.1039/C39940000801

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chung, T., Lee, S.-Y., Song, E. Y., Chun, H., and Lee, B. (2011). Plasmonic Nanostructures for Nano-Scale Bio-Sensing. Sensors 11, 10907–10929. doi:10.3390/s111110907

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deng, H., Ray, P. C., Ghann, W. E., Uddin, J., Samokhvalov, A., and Yu, H. (2019). Distance-dependent Fluorescence Quenching on a Silver Nanoparticle Surface. Chem. Lett. 48, 1504–1506. doi:10.1246/cl.190684

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Do, T. T. A., and Imae, T. (2021). Photodynamic and Photothermal Effects of Carbon Dot-Coated Magnetite- and Porphyrin-Conjugated Confeito-like Gold Nanoparticles. Bcsj 94, 2079–2088. doi:10.1246/bcsj.20210192

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Doering, W. E., and Nie, S. (2003). Spectroscopic Tags Using Dye-Embedded Nanoparticles and Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Anal. Chem. 75, 6171–6176. doi:10.1021/ac034672u

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dulkeith, E., Morteani, A. C., Niedereichholz, T., Klar, T. A., Feldmann, J., Levi, S. A., et al. (2002). Fluorescence Quenching of Dye Molecules Near Gold Nanoparticles: Radiative and Nonradiative Effects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 203002. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.203002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dulkeith, E., Ringler, M., Klar, T. A., Feldmann, J., Muñoz Javier, A., and Parak, W. J. (2005). Gold Nanoparticles Quench Fluorescence by Phase Induced Radiative Rate Suppression. Nano Lett. 5, 585–589. doi:10.1021/nl0480969

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eisfeld, A., and Briggs, J. S. (2006). The J- and H-Bands of Organic Dye Aggregates. Chem. Phys. 324, 376–384. doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2005.11.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ghosh, A., Yoshida, M., Suemori, K., Isago, H., Kobayashi, N., Mizutani, Y., et al. (2019). Soft Chromophore Featured Liquid Porphyrins and Their Utilization toward Liquid Electret Applications. Nat. Commun. 10, 4210. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12249-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glotov, A., Stavitskaya, A., Chudakov, Y., Ivanov, E., Huang, W., Vinokurov, V., et al. (2019). Mesoporous Metal Catalysts Templated on Clay Nanotubes. Bcsj 92, 61–69. doi:10.1246/bcsj.20180207

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, H.-H., Tian, H., Zang, Y., Sedgwick, A. C., Li, J., Sessler, J. L., et al. (2021). Small-molecule Fluorescence-Based Probes for Interrogating Major Organ Diseases. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 9391–9429. doi:10.1039/D0CS01183E

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hasobe, T. (2021). Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Molecular Architectures Utilizing Self-Assembled Monolayers for Singlet Fission and Light Energy Conversion. Chem. Lett. 50, 615–622. doi:10.1246/cl.200858

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hong, S., and Li, X. (2013). Optimal Size of Gold Nanoparticles for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy under Different Conditions. J. Nanomater. 2013, 1–9. doi:10.1155/2013/790323

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hostetler, M. J., Templeton, A. C., and Murray, R. W. (1999). Dynamics of Place-Exchange Reactions on Monolayer-Protected Gold Cluster Molecules. Langmuir 15, 3782–3789. doi:10.1021/la981598f

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, X., and El-Sayed, M. A. (2010). Gold Nanoparticles: Optical Properties and Implementations in Cancer Diagnosis and Photothermal Therapy. J. Adv. Res. 1, 13–28. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2010.02.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Imahori, H., Arimura, M., Hanada, T., Nishimura, Y., Yamazaki, I., Sakata, Y., et al. (2001). Photoactive Three-Dimensional Monolayers: Porphyrin−Alkanethiolate-Stabilized Gold Clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 335–336. doi:10.1021/ja002838s

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Imahori, H., Hosomizu, K., Mori, Y., Sato, T., Ahn, T. K., Kim, S. K., et al. (2004a). Substituent Effects of Porphyrin Monolayers on the Structure and Photoelectrochemical Properties of Self-Assembled Monolayers of Porphyrin on Indium−Tin Oxide Electrode. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 5018–5025. doi:10.1021/jp037625e

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Imahori, H., Kashiwagi, Y., Endo, Y., Hanada, T., Nishimura, Y., Yamazaki, I., et al. (2004b). Structure and Photophysical Properties of Porphyrin-Modified Metal Nanoclusters with Different Chain Lengths. Langmuir 20, 73–81. doi:10.1021/la035435p

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Imahori, H., Norieda, H., Nishimura, Y., Yamazaki, I., Higuchi, K., Kato, N., et al. (2000). Chain Length Effect on the Structure and Photoelectrochemical Properties of Self-Assembled Monolayers of Porphyrins on Gold Electrodes. J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 1253–1260. doi:10.1021/jp992768f

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Imahori, H., Norieda, H., Ozawa, S., Ushida, K., Yamada, H., Azuma, T., et al. (1998). Chain Length Effect on Photocurrent from Polymethylene-Linked Porphyrins in Self-Assembled Monolayers. Langmuir 14, 5335–5338. doi:10.1021/la980351f

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ingram, R. S., Hostetler, M. J., and Murray, R. W. (1997). Poly-hetero-ω-functionalized Alkanethiolate-Stabilized Gold Cluster Compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 9175–9178. doi:10.1021/ja971734n

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, R. (2010). Quantum Sized, Thiolate-Protected Gold Nanoclusters. Nanoscale 2, 343–362. doi:10.1039/B9NR00160C

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kabb, C. P., Carmean, R. N., and Sumerlin, B. S. (2015). Probing the Surface-Localized Hyperthermia of Gold Nanoparticles in a Microwave Field Using Polymeric Thermometers. Chem. Sci. 6, 5662–5669. doi:10.1039/C5SC01535A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kanehara, M., Takahashi, H., and Teranishi, T. (2008). Gold(0) Porphyrins on Gold Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 307–310. doi:10.1002/anie.200703943

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kasha, M. (1976). “Molecular Excitons in Small Aggregates,” in Spectroscopy of the Excited State (Boston, MA: Springer US), 337–363. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2793-6_12

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kinoshita, T., Fujisawa, J.-i., Nakazaki, J., Uchida, S., Kubo, T., and Segawa, H. (2012). Visible to Near-Infrared Photoelectric Conversion in a Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Using Ru(II) Porphyrin with Azopyridine Axial Ligands. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 51, 10NE02. doi:10.1143/jjap.51.10ne02

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kovaliov, M., Wachtel, C., Yavin, E., and Fischer, B. (2014). Synthesis and Evaluation of a Photoresponsive Quencher for Fluorescent Hybridization Probes. Org. Biomol. Chem. 12, 7844–7858. doi:10.1039/C4OB01185F

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kreibig, U., and Vollmer, M. (1995). Optical Properties of Metal Clusters. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-09109-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kubo, Y., Yamamoto, M., Ikeda, M., Takeuchi, M., Shinkai, S., Yamaguchi, S., et al. (2003). A Colorimetric and Ratiometric Fluorescent Chemosensor with Three Emission Changes: Fluoride Ion Sensing by a Triarylborane- Porphyrin Conjugate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 2036–2040. doi:10.1002/anie.200250788

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kulinich, A. V., Mikitenko, E. K., and Ishchenko, A. A. (2016). Scope of Negative Solvatochromism and Solvatofluorochromism of Merocyanines. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 3444–3453. doi:10.1039/C5CP06653K

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Leontidis, E., Suter, U. W., Schuetz, M., Luethi, H.-P., Renn, A., and Wild, U. P. (1995). The Mechanism of Spectral Shift and Inhomogeneous Broadening of an Aromatic Chromophore in a Polymer Glass. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 7493–7507. doi:10.1021/ja00133a022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., Zhang, H., Dong, H., Meng, L., Jiang, L., Jiang, L., et al. (2015). High Mobility Emissive Organic Semiconductor. Nat. Commun. 6, 10032. doi:10.1038/ncomms10032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, F., and Nakanishi, T. (2019). Solvent‐Free Luminous Molecular Liquids. Adv. Opt. Mater. 7, 1900176. doi:10.1002/adom.201900176

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohyama, J., Hitomi, Y., Higuchi, Y., and Tanaka, T. (2009). Size Controlled Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles by Porphyrin with Four Sulfur Atoms. Top. Catal. 52, 852–859. doi:10.1007/s11244-009-9229-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pan, S., Wang, Z., and Rothberg, L. J. (2006). Enhancement of Adsorbed Dye Monolayer Fluorescence by a Silver Nanoparticle Overlayer. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 17383–17387. doi:10.1021/jp063191m

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pérez-Rentero, S., Grijalvo, S., Peñuelas, G., Fàbrega, C., and Eritja, R. (2014). Thioctic Acid Derivatives as Building Blocks to Incorporate DNA Oligonucleotides onto Gold Nanoparticles. Molecules 19, 10495–10523. doi:10.3390/molecules190710495

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prasanna, S. W., Poorani, G., Kumar, M. S., Aruna, P., and Ganesan, S. (2014). Photodynamic Efficacy of Rosebengal-Gold Nanoparticle Complex on Vero and HeLa Cell Lines. mat express 4, 359–366. doi:10.1166/mex.2014.1173

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rao, M., and Mayor, S. (2005). Use of Forster's Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy to Study Lipid Rafts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (Bba) - Mol. Cel Res. 1746, 221–233. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.08.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rayati, S., Zakavi, S., Motlagh, S. H., Noroozi, V., Razmjoo, M., Wojtczak, A., et al. (2008). β-Tetra-brominated Meso-Tetraphenylporphyrin: A Conformational Study and Application to the Mn-Porphyrin Catalyzed Epoxidation of Olefins with Tetrabutylammonium Oxone. Polyhedron 27, 2285–2290. doi:10.1016/j.poly.2008.04.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanz, V., Conde, J., Hernández, Y., Baptista, P. V., Ibarra, M. R., and de la Fuente, J. M. (2012). Effect of PEG Biofunctional Spacers and TAT Peptide on dsRNA Loading on Gold Nanoparticles. J. Nanopart Res. 14, 917. doi:10.1007/s11051-012-0917-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sato, Y. (2020). Design of Fluorescent Peptide Nucleic Acid Probes Carrying Cyanine Dyes for Targeting Double-Stranded RNAs for Analytical Applications. Bcsj 93, 406–413. doi:10.1246/bcsj.20190361

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schuster, D. I., MacMahon, S., Guldi, D. M., Echegoyen, L., and Braslavsky, S. E. (2006). Synthesis and Photophysics of Porphyrin-Fullerene Donor-Acceptor Dyads with Conformationally Flexible Linkers. Tetrahedron 62, 1928–1936. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2005.07.127

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seybold, P. G., and Gouterman, M. (1969). Porphyrins. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 31, 1–13. doi:10.1016/0022-2852(69)90335-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shaikh, A. J., Rabbani, F., Sherazi, T. A., Iqbal, Z., Mir, S., and Shahzad, S. A. (2015). Binding Strength of Porphyrin−Gold Nanoparticle Hybrids Based on Number and Type of Linker Moieties and a Simple Method to Calculate Inner Filter Effects of Gold Nanoparticles Using Fluorescence Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. A. 119, 1108–1116. doi:10.1021/jp510924n

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shin, E.-J., and Lee, S.-H. (2002). Substituent Effect on Fluorescence and Photoisomerization of 1-(9-Anthryl)-2-(4-Pyridyl)ethenes. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 23, 1309–1338. doi:10.5012/bkcs.2002.23.9.1309

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shinohara, A., Pan, C., Wang, L., and Shinmori, H. (2020). Acid-base Controllable Singlet Oxygen Generation in Supramolecular Porphyrin-Gold Nanoparticle Composites Tethered by Rotaxane Linkers. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 24, 171–180. doi:10.1142/S108842461950086X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shinohara, A., and Shinmori, H. (2016). Controlled Generation of Singlet Oxygen by Porphyrin-Appended Gold Nanoparticles. Bcsj 89, 1341–1343. doi:10.1246/bcsj.20160254

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tanaka, S., Suzuki, H., Kamikado, T., Okuno, Y., and Mashiko, S. (2006). Conformation Control and High-Resolution Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy Study of Porphyrin Derivatives on the Substrates. J. Surf. Sci. Soc. Jpn. 27, 72–78. doi:10.1380/jsssj.27.72

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Terrill, R. H., Postlethwaite, T. A., Chen, C.-h., Poon, C.-D., Terzis, A., Chen, A., et al. (1995). Monolayers in Three Dimensions: NMR, SAXS, Thermal, and Electron Hopping Studies of Alkanethiol Stabilized Gold Clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 12537–12548. doi:10.1021/ja00155a017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thomas, K. G., and Kamat, P. V. (2003). Chromophore-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles. Acc. Chem. Res. 36, 888–898. doi:10.1021/ar030030h

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Uznański, P., Kurjata, J., and Bryszewska, E. (2009). Modification of Gold Nanoparticle Surfaces with Pyrenedisulfide in Ligand-Protected Exchange Reactions. Mater. Sci. 27, 695–670.

Google Scholar

Watanabe, Y., Sasabe, H., and Kido, J. (2019). Review of Molecular Engineering for Horizontal Molecular Orientation in Organic Light-Emitting Devices. Bcsj 92, 716–728. doi:10.1246/bcsj.20180336

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Werts, M. H. V., Zaim, H., and Blanchard-Desce, M. (2004). Excimer Probe of the Binding of Alkyl Disulfides to Gold Nanoparticles and Subsequent Monolayer dynamicsElectronic Supplementary Information (ESI) Available: Absorption Spectra of Nanoparticle Solutions in Toluene. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 3, 29–32. See http://www.rsc.Org/suppdata/pp/b3/b310952f/. doi:10.1039/b310952f

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X.-F., Zhang, J., and Liu, L. (2014). Fluorescence Properties of Twenty Fluorescein Derivatives: Lifetime, Quantum Yield, Absorption and Emission Spectra. J. Fluoresc. 24, 819–826. doi:10.1007/s10895-014-1356-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, N., Fan, J., and Stucky, G. D. (2006). One-Step One-phase Synthesis of Monodisperse Noble-Metallic Nanoparticles and Their Colloidal Crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 6550–6551. doi:10.1021/ja0604717

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zvyagina, A. I., Ezhov, A. A., Meshkov, I. N., Ivanov, V. K., Birin, K. P., König, B., et al. (2018). Plasmon-enhanced Light Absorption at Organic-Coated Interfaces: Collectivity Matters. J. Mater. Chem. C 6, 1413–1420. doi:10.1039/C7TC04905F

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar