Recent Advances in Supported Metal Catalysts and Oxide Catalysts for the Reverse Water-Gas Shift Reaction

Chen, Xiaodong; Chen, Ya; Song, Chunyu; Ji, Peiyi; Wang, Nannan; Wang, Wenlong; Cui, Lifeng

doi:10.3389/fchem.2020.00709

REVIEW article

Front. Chem., 31 August 2020

Sec. Catalysis and Photocatalysis

Volume 8 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00709

This article is part of the Research Topic Advanced Metal Oxide Nanomaterials for Energy Conversion View all 7 articles

Recent Advances in Supported Metal Catalysts and Oxide Catalysts for the Reverse Water-Gas Shift Reaction

$\nXiaodong Chen,,&#x;$ Xiaodong Chen^1,2,3^†

Ya Chen⁴^†

Chunyu Song^1,2^†

Peiyi Ji⁵

Nannan Wang¹^*

Wenlong Wang¹^*

Lifeng Cui¹^*

¹School of Materials Science and Engineering, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan, China
²Center for Clean Energy Technology, Faculty of Science, School of Mathematical and Physical Science, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
³Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Science, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
⁴School of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
⁵College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China

The reverse water-gas shift reaction (RWGSR), a crucial stage in the conversion of abundant CO₂ into chemicals or hydrocarbon fuels, has attracted extensive attention as a renewable system to synthesize fuels by non-traditional routes. There have been persistent efforts to synthesize catalysts for industrial applications, with attention given to the catalytic activity, CO selectivity, and thermal stability. In this review, we describe the thermodynamics, kinetics, and atomic-level mechanisms of the RWGSR in relation to efficient RWGSR catalysts consisting of supported catalysts and oxide catalysts. In addition, we rationally classify, summarize, and analyze the effects of physicochemical properties, such as the morphologies, compositions, promoting abilities, and presence of strong metal-support interactions (SMSI), on the catalytic performance and CO selectivity in the RWGSR over supported catalysts. Regarding oxide catalysts (i.e., pure oxides, spinel, solid solution, and perovskite-type oxides), we emphasize the relationships among their surface structure, oxygen storage capacity (OSC), and catalytic performance in the RWGSR. Furthermore, the abilities of perovskite-type oxides to enhance the RWGSR with chemical looping cycles (RWGSR-CL) are systematically illustrated. These systematic introductions shed light on development of catalysts with high performance in RWGSR.

Introduction

The increasing emissions of anthropogenic CO₂ into our atmosphere through the unrestricted use of fossil fuels to drive industrial processes and human activity, particularly over the past few decades, has resulted in damage to the “carbon neutral” status of the earth and thus caused serious harm to the ecological system and to sustainable human development (Aresta et al., 2014). Therefore, the extensive efforts are needed to develop CO₂ utilization technologies to address these issues (Mikkelsen et al., 2010). Benefiting from plentiful low-cost CO₂ raw materials as well as the increasingly advanced CO₂ capture and separation technologies, CO₂ utilization is promising for commercial-scale applications (Aresta et al., 2016; Klankermayer et al., 2016).

The reverse water-gas shift reaction (RWGSR) is an indispensable part of CO₂ utilization because it is a non-fossil route for providing feedstock for important chemical processes, such as methanol synthesis (Gao et al., 2016; Huš et al., 2017), Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (Riedel et al., 1999), and Monsanto/Cativa acetic acid synthesis (Maitlis et al., 1996; Jones, 2000). When it is used as an intermediate step in the direct thermochemical transformation of CO₂ to hydrocarbons, such as methane (Sahebdelfar and Takht Ravanchi, 2015; Avanesian et al., 2016), ethanol (Sahebdelfar and Takht Ravanchi, 2015), low-carbon olefin (Liu et al., 2008; Zheng et al., 2017), and dimethyl ether (Centi and Perathoner, 2009), the RWGSR renders the process more practical. An important workable application of the RWGSR is associated with scarce H₂ reutilization in the Mars Exploration Program, in which it could regenerate H₂O more easily for astronauts to utilize (Avanesian et al., 2016). In biomass-based solid oxide fuel cells, the ratio of CO₂/CO/H₂ in the biomass gas can be considerably dictated by the RWGSR to realize its maximum energy storage efficiency (Chen et al., 2017a). Additionally, the RWGSR can be used to couple CO₂ with alkylene oxide or low alkanes to generate valuable chemicals, including ethylene glycol (Arunajatesan et al., 2001), styrene (Burri et al., 2007; Batista et al., 2010), and light olefins (Mukherjee et al., 2016; Kang et al., 2017). In contrast to the direct thermal cracking process, these coupled reactions can effortlessly break the thermodynamic equilibrium constraints and effectively accelerate their utilization (Reddy et al., 2008; Rao et al., 2009).

The chemically inert CO₂, with its high C-O bond energy of 806 kJ mol⁻¹, enables the chemical transformation of CO₂ to CO via the RWGSR (Wang et al., 2011). According to activation theory, the adsorption of CO₂ on the oxygen vacancy sites of certain catalysts initiates the first step of the RWGSR when it involves the cleavage of its own C-O bond under thermal energy-driven conditions (Su et al., 2019). There are two idiographic activation mechanisms proposed for the production of CO from the RWGSR based on experimental observations and theoretical calculations (Goguet et al., 2016). The first pathway is CO₂ hydrogenation to CO via the RWGSR, which proceeds via more reactive carboxyl (COOH^*) or formate (HCOO^*) intermediates, and the other pathway is the decomposition of CO₂ to CO^* + O^*via the direct C-O bond cleavage pathway (Weatherbee and Bartholomew, 1984; Kattel et al., 2016a). Once activated, these adsorbed intermediates will be instantaneously dissociated or desorbed on the constructed active centers of these catalysts to form the CO product (Tang et al., 2009; Roiaz et al., 2016). Based on this objective analysis, it is imperative to develop effective catalysts for CO₂ activation in the RWGSR.

In this review, we concentrate on the catalytic performance of the RWGSR with two major categories of heterogeneous catalysts, including supported metal catalysts and oxide catalysts, which is a subject of increasing interest. Utilizing the thermodynamics and kinetics analyses and the atomic-level mechanisms, the principles of RWGSR catalyst design will be comprehensively described. In addition, the physicochemical properties of supported catalysts, such as the morphologies, compositions, promoting abilities, and presence of metal-support interactions, which affect the catalytic activity and CO selectivity of the RWGSR, will be systematically introduced to elucidate the structure-activity relationships. The relationships among the surface structure, oxygen storage capacity (OSC) and catalytic performance of oxide catalysts in the RWGSR are highlighted, especially for the application of perovskite-type oxides to enhance the RWGSR-CL. The present review provides general guidelines for the state-of-the-art architecture of heterogeneous catalysts for the RWGSR and a discussion of their challenges and further prospects.

Thermodynamic Analysis

Since CO is arguably the most important C1-builiding block, the synthetic route of “CO₂-to-CO” is considered an economical and valuable strategy (Barnard, 2008; Brennführer et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2011). Based on the thermodynamic standard enthalpy, the transformation of CO₂ to CO via the RWGSR is more thermodynamically favorable at elevated temperature because it is reversible and endothermic and because its chemical equilibrium is pressure independent, as shown in Equation (1). However, the RWGSR is always accompanied by undesired CO₂ methanation over the catalysts because of its excessive hydrogenation under ambient pressure (Kim et al., 2015; Ishito et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2017). In addition, methanation is exothermic, favored at lower temperature, and pressure dependent, as shown in Equation (2).

\begin{array}{l} C O_{2} + H_{2} \to CO + H_{2} O Δ_{r} H^{θ} (298.15 K) \\ = + 40.6 kJ mo l^{- 1} . & (1) \end{array}

\begin{array}{l} C O_{2} + 4 H_{2} \to C H_{4} + 2 H_{2} O Δ_{r} H^{θ} (298.15 K) \\ = - 165.0 kJ mo l^{- 1} . & (2) \end{array}

For both the parallel and the cascade reactions over the catalysts, the CO yield is seriously restricted to H₂ utilization in additional competitive methanations. From the thermodynamic standpoint, as shown in Figure 1, the equilibrium composition favors the production of CH₄ rather than that of CO in the RWGSR at lower temperatures. Therefore, it is challenging to construct heterogeneous catalysts to restrict the production of undesirable CH₄ as a lower value-added by-product for applications at lower temperatures.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Equilibrium composition of the RWGSR and CO₂ methanation (CO₂:H₂ = 1:1).

Mechanism

The well-known catalytic mechanisms proposed for the RWGSR reaction can be classified into two categories: surface redox mechanisms and associative mechanisms (Su et al., 2017). The major difference between these mechanisms is whether the dissociated H₂ species is involved in the formation of the carbon-containing intermediates, namely, formats, and carboxyls (Lin et al., 2017).

Surface Redox Mechanism

The alternative oxido-reduction of active sites on the catalyst surface in the atmosphere of CO₂/H₂ feedstock is believed to be a prerequisite for the sustainability of the RWGSR. For Cu-based catalysts, e.g., the reaction mechanism can be described as follows (Chen et al., 2000; Xu and Ge, 2016):

\begin{array}{l} C O_{2} (g) + 2 C u^{0} (s) \to CO (g) + C u_{2} O (s) & (3) \end{array}

\begin{array}{l} H_{2} (g) + C u_{2} O (s) \to H_{2} O (s) + 2 C u^{0} (s) . & (4) \end{array}

In these reactions, Cu⁰, the active site in the RWGSR, is involved in the rate-controlling step, CO₂ reduction. The CO₂ oxidizes the Cu⁰ to generate Cu⁺ and CO, while the H₂ reduces the Cu⁺ to Cu⁰ to form H₂O; thus, the reaction conforms to a redox mechanism. When the whole catalytic process of the RWGSR is considered in detail, the mechanism of the surface redox reaction can be decomposed into the following basic steps (“^*” denotes the vacancy sites) (Gines et al., 1997; Fornero et al., 2017):

\begin{array}{l} C O_{2} (g) + 2^{*} \to C O^{*} + O^{*} & (5) \end{array}

\begin{array}{l} C O^{*} \to CO (g) +^{*} & (6) \end{array}

\begin{array}{l} H_{2} (g) + 2^{*} \to 2 H^{*} & (7) \end{array}

\begin{array}{l} 2 H^{*} + O^{*} \to H_{2} O^{*} + 2^{*} & (8) \end{array}

\begin{array}{l} H_{2} O^{*} \to H_{2} O (g) +^{*} . & (9) \end{array}

The study of kinetics is an important tool for establishing the redox mechanism of the RWGSR. Based on the Monte Carlo method to approximately simulate the RWGSR process over the Cu-based catalysts, CO₂ dissociates immediately to give CO and adsorbed oxygen species and is then reduced by H₂ with equivalent stoichiometric coefficients (Gines et al., 1997; Xu and Ge, 2016). In this process, the dissociative adsorption of CO₂ on the Cu particles is the rate-determining step, and the reduction of the adsorbed oxygen-containing species and surface hydroxyls follows (Fujita et al., 1992; Wang et al., 2013b). Real-time temporal analysis of the products confirms that a surface-reduced Au/CeO₂ catalyst can be reoxidized by exposure to CO₂ pulses and that the surface oxygen deposited in this way can be reactively removed again, which is a prerequisite for the redox mechanism in the RWGSR. Furthermore, neglecting the changes in the hydroxyls and H₂O on the surface imposed by the presence of H₂ in the feed, the activity for active oxygen deposition is sufficient to make the redox mechanism the dominant reaction pathway (Fornero et al., 2017). Realistically, the RWGSR proceeds though a redox mechanism over Au/TiO₂ catalysts in which the existing surface hydroxyls, surface Ti³⁺, and oxygen vacancies can jointly participate in the formation of a hydroxycarbonyl intermediate, which quickly decomposes to CO (Bobadilla et al., 2018). According to Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations, the RWGSR on Cu@Mo₂C (001) is preferentially selective for CO via a redox mechanism, and compared to the reaction via a COOH mechanism, the HCOO mechanism is kinetically less favorable due to its higher activation barrier in the rate-determining step, as shown in Figure 2. In the same way as the redox mechanism, the RWGSR occurs first by spontaneous dissociation of H₂ to form H^*, second by CO^* and O^* formation from the direct C-O bond cleavage of molecular CO₂, third by the reaction of H^* and O^* to produce OH^*, fourth by the reaction of two OH^* species to generate H₂O^*, and finally by the desorption of CO and H₂O gas on the Cu@Mo₂C (001) catalyst. Notably, the step for OH^* formation rather than CO^* formation in the redox mechanism, which has a higher activation barrier of 1.4 eV, is the rate-determining step (Jing et al., 2019).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Calculated potential energy profile of the most favorable redox (red line), HCOO (green line), and COOH (black line) mechanisms for the RWGSR on the Cu@Mo2C (001) surface. The numbers in the figure are the activation barriers of the elementary steps. The numbers in red, green, and black circles are the activation barriers of the rate-limiting steps in the redox, HCOO, and COOH pathways, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Jing et al. (2019). Copyright (2019) American Chemical Society.

Associative Mechanism

Formate Species

The RWGSR pathway involves a formate (HCOO^*) intermediate that is formed by the initial ${CO}_{2}^{*}$ hydrogenation step and subsequently undergoes an instantaneous dissociation reaction to produce CO (Arunajatesan et al., 2007; Cao et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2016; Wolf et al., 2016). The reaction is described by the following steps (“^*” denotes the vacancy sites) (Chen et al., 2017a,b):

\begin{array}{l} H_{2} (g) + 2^{*} \to H^{*} + H^{*} & (10) \end{array}

\begin{array}{l} C O_{2} (g) +^{*} \to {CO}_{2}^{*} & (11) \end{array}

\begin{array}{l} {CO}_{2}^{*} + H^{*} \to HCO O^{*} +^{*} & (12) \end{array}

\begin{array}{l} HCO O^{*} (COO H^{*}) +^{*} \to HC O^{*} (CO H^{*}) + O^{*} & (13) \end{array}

\begin{array}{l} HC O^{*} (CO H^{*}) +^{*} \to C O^{*} + H^{*} & (14) \end{array}

\begin{array}{l} H^{*} + O^{*} \to O H^{*} +^{*} & (15) \end{array}

\begin{array}{l} H^{*} + O H^{*} \to H_{2} O^{*} & (16) \end{array}

\begin{array}{l} H_{2} O^{*} \to H_{2} O (g) +^{*} & (17) \end{array}

\begin{array}{l} C O^{*} \to CO (g) +^{*} . & (18) \end{array}

As indicated by the temperature-programmed desorption spectra of H₂/CO₂ co-adsorbed on Cu/SiO₂ and Cu/K/SiO₂ catalysts, the H atoms either associate with CO₂-Cu to form formates or migrate to the surfaces of the interfacial sites, resulting in the formation of K₂O and CO by decomposition (Chen and Cheng, 2002; Chen et al., 2003). Regarding the chemical state of Cu in the RWGSR, the Cu⁰ and Cu⁺ atoms are proposed to coexist on the Cu-based catalyst surface, and their roles are possibly to dissociate H₂ and stabilize the formats, respectively (Chen et al., 2000). Based on transient diffused reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (DRIFTS), the appearance of interfacial sites may result from an electron transfer from the Pt to the neighboring O in the KO_x species over the Pt/K/mutille and Pt/K/L catalysts, which are responsible for the decomposition of the formates to produce CO (Liang et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017). The in-situ DRIFTS also shows that when strong basic sites, such as those of KOH, are introduced into Ni/Al₂O₃ catalysts, the formates instead of the carbonates are strongly absorbed on their surface, promoting the hydrogenation of CO₂ to CO via the RWGSR (Zhang et al., 2019a). For Cu/CeO₂-nanorode catalysts, in-situ DRIFTS points to bidentate formate as the active intermediates for the RWGSR because the preferential formation of a high bidentate formate coverage on their surface may have the surface geometry of a CeO₂ (110) termination in which the nearest surface oxygen distance is 2.71Å, which is a more suitable spacing for the formation of bidentate formates and could thus be the main reason for the excellent performance (Lin et al., 2018a,b). The results from in-situ DRIFTS indicate that the CO₂ must first react with the surface hydroxyls on Al₂O₃ to form bicarbonates, which subsequently react with the adsorbed H on Ru or Au to produce adsorbed formates, most likely at the metal/oxide interface, and then react rapidly with the adsorbed H to form CO (Wang et al., 2016a; Bobadilla et al., 2018). Based on a steady-state isotopic transient kinetic analysis, the disappearance trend of the infrared signatures of H¹²COO^* is consistent with the MS signals of ¹²CO products when the feed gas is switched from ¹²CO₂/H₂/Ar to ¹³CO₂/H₂/Ar over a Pd/Al₂O₃ catalyst, suggesting that H¹²COO^* is the reactive intermediate rather than a spectator, and the rate-determining step for the CO formation is related to HCOO^* (Wang et al., 2017). DFT calculations demonstrate that a formate mechanism is feasible for the RWGSR catalyzed by M₁/W₆S₈ (M = Fe, Ru, and Os). More concretely, HCOO^* formation starts with the most stable adsorption configuration of ${CO}_{2}^{*}$ , in which an H^* is placed on the S site, and H^* tends to attack the C atom of CO₂ to form a C-H bond. When HCOO^* is formed, it is hydrogenated to form a HCOOH^* intermediate with a relatively low activation energy barrier, and the conversion will proceed to form the final product, CO. In the overall process, the H₂ dissociation on M₁/W₆S₈ (M = Fe, Ru, and Os) is the rate-determining step (Zhang et al., 2018).

Carboxyl Species

The carbonyl species, the predominately active intermediate, is selectivity produced through activation of the C-O bond of the CO₂ molecule followed by H-assisted formation of COOH^* (Tibiletti et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2012a,b). This intermediate immediately decomposes into CO by two different pathways, as shown below (“^*” denotes the vacancy sites) (Chen et al., 2017a,b).

On the basis of in-situ Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analyses, a Pt/TiO₂ catalyst treated at a high temperature and possessing reducible TiO₂ sites but no Pt sites is exclusively active for CO product, and thus the carboxyl species formed on the reducible TiO₂ sites are the intermediates in the formation of CO in the RWGSR (Kim et al., 2013). H/D isotopic substitution and kinetics and the results of the in-situ DRIFTS experiments illustrate that the CO formation proceeds via a mechanism in which H assists the dissociation of the C-O bond and that a carboxyl is a more plausible intermediate than is a formate. In addition, the formates is still present on the Cu surface under the reaction conditions, but a fraction of them can be considered spectators of the reaction mechanism (Karelovic et al., 2019). The results from transient DRIFT-MS steady-state isotopic transient kinetic analysis analyses indicate that the characteristic exchange time (defined here as the time at which the DRIFTS signal of the intermediate decreases by 50% following the isotopic switch) of the carboxyl species agrees with that of the CO product (defined here as the time needed to achieve 50% exchange between the two isotopes, e.g., ¹²CO(g) and ¹³CO(g) of the main reaction product from MS measurements) when the feed gas is switched from ¹³CO₂/H₂ to ¹²CO₂/H₂ over the Pt/CeO₂ catalyst. These data quantitatively demonstrated that, for the present catalyst and conditions, the main reaction pathway is the formation of CO from the carboxyl species at the oxygen vacancies over the Pt-CeO_x interface (Goguet et al., 2004a). DFT calculations indicate that the formation of COOH^* over Mo₆S₈-TM (TM = Pd, Pt, Ag) nanoclusters by the binding of the H^* atom to the O atom of ${CO}_{2^{*}}$ followed by its decomposition to CO is very favorable. Note that the COOH^* dissociation over Mo₆S₈-Ag is the rate-determining step in the overall process, whereas the rate-determining step of Mo₆S₈-Pd and Mo₆S₈-Pt in the carboxyl pathway is the transition step of the H₂ dissociation (Zheng et al., 2017). Moreover, DFT calculations show that the RWGSR complies with a carboxyl mechanism over a Ni₅/YSZ (111) catalyst through the identification of the structures and calculation of the energies of the intermediate state and two transition states, as shown in Figure 3. It has been suggested that one of the H^* atoms migrates toward the nearest O atom of the ${CO}_{2}^{*}$ to form the COOH^* intermediate and subsequently involves its protonation, allowing the formation of H₂O^* adsorbed on the surface and the CO^* adsorbed on the Ni cluster. This calculation also shows that the second transition state for the dissociation of the COOH^* intermediate is the rate-determining step of the overall pathway and has an energy barrier of 1.51 eV (Cadi-Essadek et al., 2018).

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Energy profile showing the reactants, intermediates, transition states, and final products for the RWGSR on the Ni₅/YSZ(111) interface (Color key: O, Zr, Y, Ni, C, and H are represented by red, gray, cyan, blue, black, and white spheres, respectively. The yellow spheres represent the oxygen vacancies). Reprinted with permission from Cadi-Essadek et al. (2018). Copyright (2018) American Chemical Society.

Catalytic System

In recent decades, heterogeneous catalysts that promote the RWGSR have been extensively studied because of the gradual realization of their widespread application prospects for CO₂ utilization. At the early stage, much research has focused on the oxide catalysts due to their effluent oxygen vacancies sites, such as CeO₂, CuO, ZnO, Al₂O₃, Fe₂O₃, Cr₂O₃, In₂O₃, and MnO₂ (Saeidi et al., 2017; Su et al., 2017; He et al., 2019). Although the CO selectivities of these oxide catalysts are desirable in RWGSR, their disadvantages of lower CO₂ activation and feasible poisons and sintering are hindering their extended application. In order to address these issues, persistent studies have concentrated on the fabrication of composite oxides (i.e., CuO/ZnO/Al₂O₃, NiO/CeO₂, ZnO/Al₂O₃, ZnO/Cr₂O₃, CuOx/CeO₂, CuO–CeO₂/SBA-15, In₂O₃-CeO₂, FeO_x, etc.) (Liu et al., 2015; Dai et al., 2018; Ronda-Lloret et al., 2018; Panarities et al., 2020), spinel oxides (i.e., ZnAl₂O₄, ZnCr₂O₄, CuAl₂O₄, CoAl₂O₄, etc.) (Joo and Jung, 2003; Bahmanpour et al., 2019, 2020), solid solution oxides (i.e., Zn_xZr_1−xO_2−y, Ce_0.5Zr_0.5O₂, Ni_xCe_0.75Zr_0.25−xO₂, etc.) (Zonetti et al., 2014), and perovskite-type oxides (i.e., BaZr_0.8Y_0.16Zn_0.04O₃, La_0.75Sr_0.25CoO_3−δ, La_0.75Sr_0.25FeO₃, La_0.75Sr_0.25Fe_1−YCu_YO₃, LaNiO₃, La_0.9Sr_0.1NiO_3+δ, La_0.9Sr_0.1FeO_3−δ, La_0.9Sr_0.1Ni_0.5Fe_0.5O_3−δ, La_0.75Sr_0.25Cr_0.5Mn_0.5O_3−δ, SrCe_0.9Y_0.1O_3−δ, etc.) (Yamazoe et al., 1982; Ten Elshof et al., 1996; Klvana et al., 1999; Yang and Lin, 2006; Radovic et al., 2008; Zhuang et al., 2019; Bogolowski et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020), which have the approvable characteristics of both stable structure and reverse oxygen storage capacity to increase RWGSR performance.

Recently, considerable efforts have been devoted to the design of metal-based catalysts (i.e., Pt, Pd, Au, Rh, Ru, Cu, Ni, Re, Co, Fe, Mo, etc.) immobilized onto the metal oxide support material (i.e., CeO₂, TiO₂, Al₂O₃, ZnO, ZrO₂, SiO₂, etc.) (Goguet et al., 2004b; Wang et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2015; Álvarez Galván et al., 2016; Ro et al., 2016; Nielsen et al., 2018) because they have metal/oxide interfaces with high reducibility to facilitate CO₂ activation in RWGSR. However, the CH₄ may be easily produced on these catalysts in the case of excessive hydrogenation of the C-O bond of the CO₂ molecule, which can be detrimental to CO selectivity (Yeung et al., 2005; Sun et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2016b; Kattel et al., 2017). In reality, an effective supported metal catalyst must be capable of both the C-O bond scission of CO₂ and the appropriate hydrogenation. Thus, the supported metal catalysts must not only dissociate hydrogen relatively easily but also allow it to migrate onto the adjacent oxygen vacancies, where the adsorbed CO₂ is further hydrogenated (Chen and Cheng, 2002; Wang et al., 2017). Furthermore, the details of the activity and selectivity of some representative RWGSR catalysts under reaction conditions are presented in Table 1.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Summary of the reaction conditions with conversion to and selectivity for CO, when available, for selected RWGSR catalysts.

Supported Metal Catalysts

The supported catalysts that can be seriously considered in the RWGSR due to their bifunctional catalytic roles for CO₂ activation and appropriate hydrogenation (Porosoff et al., 2016). However, RWGSR is demonstrated to be structure sensitive reaction; thus, the CO selectivity of which can be dictated by tailoring the structure functionality of supported catalysts through the SMSI effect, metal size effect, shape and crystal face effect, bimetallic effect, and alkali promoter effect to boost their concentrated activity.

Strong Metal-Support Interaction (SMSI) Effect

The importance of support has been increasingly recognized in the decades following the discovery of SMSIs (Garin, 2001; Diebold, 2003; Neophytides et al., 2005; Fu and Wagner, 2007; Liu et al., 2013). In addition to dispersing metallic particles, the support also functions to influence the catalytic properties of the supported metal catalysts through geometric or electronic effects (Naito et al., 2006; Krstajić et al., 2008; Delgado et al., 2011; Li et al., 2015). In this section, the mechanisms by which SMSI effects provide catalytic characteristics of supported catalysts for the RWGSR are further elucidated.

The high electron donating property of metallic Pt in contact with a Ti³⁺ ion site is caused by the SMSI effect, which generates new Pt-O_v-Ti³⁺ sites for CO production over the Pt/TiO₂ catalyst (Kim et al., 2012a,b, 2013). Additionally, by replacing the ZrO₂ support by TiO₂, the SMSI effect selectively weakens the binding of the C-O bond and O-bond intermediates at the PtCo-oxide interface, thus leading to the high selectivity toward CO in the RWGSR (Kattel et al., 2016b). For TiO₂-supported Rh catalysts, an adsorbate-mediated SMSI (A-SMSI) encapsulation state can be formed as a result of its treatment in a 20CO₂:2H₂ environment at 250°C. The high coverage of the adsorbates (HCO_x) on the support induces oxygen vacancy formation, driving the migration of the HCO_x-functionalized support onto the metal. This A-SMSI encapsulation state is more stable against reoxidation by H₂O in the RWGSR process compared with the SMSI encapsulation state formed as a result of only H₂ treatment, which modifies the reactivity of all the remaining exposed Rh sites and appears to be comprehensive in covering the Rh but permeable to reactants, due to its amorphous properties. Consequently, formation of the A-SMSI state induces a selectivity switch in the CO₂-reduction reaction from the CH₄ production on the bare Rh particles to the CO product in the A-SMSI state, thus effectively rendering Rh less active for C-H bond formation (Matsubu et al., 2017). For Ir/CeO₂ catalysts, the SMSIs can enable more oxygen atoms to be incorporated into the metal surface, resulting in a weaker CO adsorption strength over the partially oxidized Ir nanoparticles and giving a near 100% selectivity toward CO compared with that over the corresponding metallic Ir. Therefore, modulation of the chemical state of the metal species by the SMSI is more important for the regulation of the observed CO selectivity in the RWGSR (Li et al., 2017). For the Cu/CeO₂ catalyst, the Ce³⁺-O_v-Cu⁰ and Cu⁰-CeO_2−δ interface structures can be generated by the electron transfer from Cu to Ce on its surface through SMSI effect, which can boost the adsorption and activation performance of reactant CO₂ and H₂ molecules for RWGSR (Zhou et al., 2020). In the simulation of catalytic CO₂ reduction by Pd-decorated silicon-hydride nanosheets (Pd@SiNS), the direct SMSI between the Pd nanoparticle and the Si nanosheet causes H transfer from the Pd to the oxidized SiNS surface, which may occur repeatedly by two mechanisms. First, an H atom adsorbed on the Pd nanoparticle interacts with a surface Si-O-Si and creates a Si-OH; second, another H from the Pd nanoparticle forms a bond with the Si-OH, which leads to desorption of the H₂O, creating a surface radical, thereby enabling a catalytic cycle. Furthermore, the strain induced in the SiNS by the Si-O-Si bonds enhances the reactivity of the oxidized SiNS surface toward the transformation of CO₂ to CO under mild conditions (Qian et al., 2019). In the context of Mo₂C-supported Co catalysts, the SMSI effect facilitates the formation of the amorphous CoMoC_yO_z phase formed during the CO₂ hydrogenation, in which the Co with a positive charge is identified as the critical active site that dissociates CH₄ to CO. Therefore, the addition of 7.5% Co to Mo₂C leads to an increase in conversion from 8.7 to 9.5%, while the CO:CH₄ ratio increases from 15 to 51 (Porosoff et al., 2014). When Cu is added to the β-Mo₂C support during the preparation process, the SMSI effect not only promotes the dispersion of supported copper and prevents the aggregation of Cu particles but also enables a portion of the electrons to transfer from Cu to Mo₂C so that the Cu⁺ and Cu⁰ species coexist in the Cu/β-Mo₂C catalyst. Its modulated electronic structure makes the highly dispersed Cu species more active in the CO₂ activation and accelerates the CO^* desorption in the following transformation reactions, which accounts for its excellent activity in the RWGSR, as depicted in Figure 4 (Zhang et al., 2016).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. RWGSR rate and SMSI effect of Cu/β-Mo₂C and reference catalysts. Reprinted with permission from Zhang et al. (2016). Copyright (2017) American Chemical Society.

Metal Size Effect

The RWGSR is considered structure sensitive for supported catalysts, of which the intermediate dissociation pathway associated with H assistance is substantially dependent on the size of the anchored metal active sties and thus exerts an influence on the CO selectivity of the RWGSR (Chen et al., 2017a).

Multiple studies have been conducted to study the size effect of metal sites relative to CO selectivity in supported noble metal catalysts. The metal active sites (i.e., Pt, Pd, Ru) dispersed at an atomic level contribute more to the CO product compared to metal clusters at a 3D level. This phenomenon is a consequence of the absence of larger metals clusters in which the initially formed CO_ad can be further activated during the continuous reaction (Kwak et al., 2013a,b; Wang et al., 2016a; Chen et al., 2017a). In addition, the Pd sites that slightly retain the CO surface species formed from the formates and other intermediates are more prevalent on the surface of the smaller Pd particles and thus exhibit a higher selectivity toward the CO product. In contrast, the larger Pd particles, due to a higher population of terrace sites in which it is easier to form multi-bound CO and dissociated H₂ bound in the vicinity of CO, reveal a stronger interaction with CO. These stable CO species are mainly in multi-bound forms and act as the direct intermediates to CH₄ (Wang et al., 2015, 2017). Matsubu et al. have utilized DRIFTS with known site-specific extinction coefficients to quantify the fraction of Rh sites residing as atomically dispersed isolated sites (Rh_iso), as well as Rh sites on the surface of Rh nanoparticles (Rh_NP) for a series of TiO₂ supported Rh catalysts. The reaction condition-induced disintegration of Rh_NP, which form the Rh_iso active sites, have been observed to control the CO selectivity of the RWGSR (Matsubu et al., 2015). Furthermore, we have determined that the difference between the desorption energy and dissociation barrier of metal carbonyls is a critical factor for determining the CO selectivity of the RWGSR by combining DFT calculations and experiments, as shown in Figure 5. Specifically, narrowing the size of the Ir active sites by decreasing the Ir loading over Ir/TiO₂ catalysts can hinder the carbonyl dissociation but improve the CO desorption, giving rise to CO selectivity (Chen et al., 2017a).

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Comparative CO and CH₄ selectivities of the Ir₁/TiO₂, Ir₅/TiO₂, Pt₅/TiO₂, and Au₅/TiO₂ catalysts. Reprinted with permission from Chen et al. (2017a). Copyright (2017) American Chemical Society.

For supported non-noble metal catalysts, significant efforts on Ni-based catalysts have also shown that smaller anchored Ni active sites are beneficial to produce CO in the RWGSR (Wang et al., 2013a,d; Lu and Kawamoto, 2014). The consecutive pathway is favored on small Ni particles, which is attributed to low H₂ coverage on the Ni surface, thus leading to the dissociation of the intermediates and high CO selectivity. Whereas the RWGSR on large Ni particles may be controlled by mixed consecutive and parallel pathways, it increases the likelihood that the intermediates will be competitively hydrogenated to CO or CH₄ as part of a parallel reaction pathway (Wu et al., 2015). Millet et al. reported on the activation of CO₂ on Ni single-atom catalysts that are synthesized using a solid solution approach by controlled substitution of 1–10 atom % of Mg²⁺ by Ni²⁺ inside the MgO structure. The Ni atoms are preferentially located on the surface of the MgO and, as predicted by hybrid-functional calculations, favor the low-coordinated sites, where they can reduce the strength of the CO₂ binding and promote H₂ dissociation. Thus, the Ni atoms are active for CO₂ conversion through the RWGSR but are unable to conduct its further hydrogenation to CH₄, for which Ni clusters are needed (Millet et al., 2019).

Shape and Crystal Face Effect

RWGSR activities are also significantly depending on the shape and exposed crystal face of catalysts because they can determine the virtual adsorption energy and desorption energy of intermediates in the reaction process (Liu et al., 2019).

Up to now, abundant efforts have been dedicated to study the effect of surface structure of Cu-based catalysts on RWGSR performance. Through the simulation of the adsorption of CO₂, H₂, H, O, OH, CO, and H₂O on the Cu(hkl) surfaces at low coverage, it has been demonstrated that the trend in the calculated activation barriers for the reaction is CO₂ dissociative adsorption (namely CO_{2, g} COs + Os) follows the order of Cu(110)<Cu(100)<Cu(111), suggesting that the most efficient crystal surface for catalyzing RWGSR by copper is Cu(110), and the more densely packed Cu(111) surface is the least active among the Cu(hkl) surfaces studied here (Nakamura et al., 1998; Wang et al., 2003; Wang and Nakamura, 2010). When the Cu particles are doped onto the CeO₂-Nanaorod and CeO₂-Nanosphere surfaces, respectively, which can be marked as Cu/CeO₂-NR(111) and Cu/CeO₂-NS(110), by comparation, the Cu/CeO₂-NR displays the higher RWGSR activity. This is mainly because that the CO₂ dissociative activation and the formation of active bidentate carbonate and formate intermediates over CeO₂(110) become more feasible (Kovacevic et al., 2016; Lin et al., 2018b). Furthermore, self-assembled CeO₂ with 3D hollow nanosphere, nanoparticle, and nanocube morphologies are used to support Cu particles, which can be denoted as Cu/CeO₂-hs(111), Cu/CeO₂-np(111), and Cu/CeO₂-nc(200), respectively. Thereinto, the Cu/CeO₂-hs(111) presents the best catalytic RWGSR performance among these as-prepared catalysts due to its high concentration of active oxygen vacancies sites (Zhang et al., 2020). For PtCo/TiO₂(110), ^*HCOO is formed as an intermediate, which may eventually produce CO, whereas for PtCo/CeO₂(110), the aside from the route that proceeds via ^*HCOO, a pathway via a ^*CH₃O intermediate is operating in parallel, which likely leads to the formation of CH₄. Moreover, DFT calculation demonstrates that the adsorption of CO₂ is stronger at the Ni_n/YSZ(111) (n = 4–7, 10, and 20) interface than on the clean YSZ(111) between the Ni clusters and the YSZ(111) surface, which facilitates the transformation of CO₂ to CO (Cadi-Essadek et al., 2018). For Cu@Mo₂C(001) and Cu₄@Mo₂C(001) surfaces, although the dissociative adsorption of H₂ on these two surface is barrier-free and highly exothermic, the activation barrier of carboxyl formation or C-O bond scission as a rate-limiting step on the Cu₄@Mo₂C(001) surfaces is smaller, and the desorption of CO at the Cu site needs less heat than Mo site, thereby accelerating CO₂ conversion in RWGSR (Chen and Cheng, 2002).

Bimetallic Effect

The behavior of a catalyst is modulated by its interaction with other catalyst components, such as a second metal, which influences it through electronic interactions, generates interfacial active sites, or is directly involved in the reaction by bonding to reactants or intermediates (Liu and Liu, 1999; Liu et al., 2015). Therefore, supported bimetallic catalysts have been extensively used for the RWGSR due to their tuning catalytic activity that may be achieved by two metals working synergistically.

The existence of Mo in the structure of the Fe-Mo/Al₂O₃ catalyst enhances its catalytic performance for the RWGSR due to the electronic effect, which transfers electrons from Fe to Mo and leads to an electron-deficient state of the Fe species, in which it is not helpful for CO adsorption and hence inhibits the continuous hydrogenation of the intermediates (Kharaji et al., 2013; Panaritis et al., 2018). It is reasonable for the Ni species with the electron deficient state to possess high catalytic performance for RWGSR when Ni is added as a second metal component to the Mo/Al₂O₃ catalyst (Kharaji et al., 2014). As for RuNi/CeZr catalyst, the addition of Ru enhances the Ni reducibility and leads to greater Ni dispersion on the catalyst surface, thus promoting overall activity and CO selectivity for the RWGSR (Sache et al., 2020). Typically, MOF-74 plays a role in helping adsorb and deliver electrons, whereas the low amount of Au@Pd NPs in Au@Pd@MOF-74 results in the poor photon adsorption strength of the Au@Pd active sites. Based on this feature, the core-shell Au@Pd@MOF-74 nanostructure is more propitious to generate CO than MOF-74 in the RWGSR because CO generation is a two-electron reaction, while CH₄ generation requires eight electrons; thus, it is more difficult to produce CH₄ (Han et al., 2019). Because of the functional characteristics of Au@Pd nanoparticles, the Pt/Au@Pd@UIO-66 catalyst is synthesized to improve its catalytic activity in the RWGSR, as shown in Figure 6. In this system, the core-shell monodispersed Au@Pd nanosphere is encapsulated in the UIO-66 to control its morphology and impart nanoparticle functionality. Additionally, the microporous nature of the UIO-66 assists the adsorption of the Pt nanoparticles, which enhances the interaction between them, favoring the formation of isolated and well-dispersed Pt nanoparticle active sites. This advanced architecture results in excellent catalytic activity and CO selectivity for the RWGSR, and the concept of inserting nanoparticles into microporous MOFs will revolutionize future industrial applications (Zheng et al., 2018). DFT calculations indicate that the catalytic behavior of a Cu₁₂TM (TM = Co, Rh, Ir, Ni, Pd, Ag, Au) bimetallic nanocluster in the RWGSR is dependent on the position of the d-band center. In general, the closer the d-band center is to the Fermi level of these catalysts, the greater is the CO₂ adsorption energy, and the smaller is the C-O bond dissociation barrier. Therefore, Cu₁₂Co delivers better catalytic activity for the RWGSR, with a TOF value of 8.96^*10⁻¹³ s⁻¹, than do the Cu₁₃ and Cu₁₂TM bimetallic systems, due to its d-center value of −0.547 eV, which is higher than that of the other two systems (Zhang and Guo, 2018). Furthermore, for γ-Al₂O₃- and CeO₂-supported Co catalysts, with the addition of Pt as the second component, the values of the d-band center move from the Fermi level toward more negative values, which prevents the excessive hydrogenation of the C-O bond of the CO₂ molecule and thereby increases the CO selectivity of the RWGSR (Porosoff and Chen, 2013). In addition, the deposition of Mo onto Au/SiO₂ catalyst generates new Au/MoO_x interfacial sites since it preferentially occurs on undercoordinated Au sites. The heat of CO adsorption (ΔH_ads) for the Au/MoO_x sites is 33 kJ mol⁻¹, considerably lower than that of the Au⁰ sites, indicating that these interfacial sites are more selective than the Au⁰ sites for the RWGSR (Carrasquillo-Flores et al., 2015). Similarly, the Cu/Fe interfacial active sites are generated after introduction of additional Fe into the Cu/SiO₂ catalyst, on which the formation of the Fe-Cu bond also prevents Cu from being sintered and oxidized during the RWGSR (Chen et al., 2004). Moreover, the addition of Cu to the Mo/FAU catalyst results in an improvement in the reducibility of MoO₃. Therefore, the Mo(0.8)Cu(0.2)/FAU catalyst, which contains co-supported Mo-Cu at an atomic ratio of 4:1, exhibits the higher CO yield of 18.5% and selectivity of 99% compared with the supported Mo catalyst for the RWGSR with the feed gas (H₂:CO₂ = 1:1) at atmosphere pressure and 773K (Okemoto et al., 2020). The bulk Pt₃Ni intermetallic parent compound is formed selectively over the Pt-Ni bimetallic catalysts supported on mesoporous silica, which is related to the thermodynamics of the phase equilibria with a metal silicate that precludes the formation of more Ni-rich intermetallics during the operando conditions of the RWGSR, as shown in Figure 7. This proposed intermetallic structure for these ~1 nm supported clusters, shows a surface/interfacial speciation of the Ni in which only heterometallic Pt-Ni interactions are present in an atomic arrangement within the catalytically active bimetallic sites, which afford exceptionally high activity and CO selectivity in the RWGSR (Liu et al., 2018).

FIGURE 6

Figure 6. Synthetic route for the production of Au@Pd NPs and other nanocomposites. Reprinted with permission from Zheng et al. (2018). Copyright (2017) Wiley-VCH.

FIGURE 7

Figure 7. Schematic model of the PtNi/SBA-15 catalyst. Reprinted with permission from Liu et al. (2018). Copyright (2018) American Chemical Society.

Alkali Promoter Effect

For supported heterogeneous catalysts, alkali metal components are typically introduced as promoters to increase the amount of adsorption sites and mediate the adsorption strength of the reactants and intermediates on the “inert support” (Li et al., 1998; Gálvez et al., 2013; Obalová et al., 2013; Connor and Holland, 2017; Pacultová et al., 2017). For instance, the addition of alkali metal promoters is crucial for industrial catalysts substantially applied in the Fisher-Tropsch synthesis (Mirzaei et al., 2006; Okabe et al., 2007; Feyzi et al., 2011; Cosultchi et al., 2012) and ammonia synthesis (Shimoda et al., 2017; Lin et al., 2018a; Jafari et al., 2019; Rogowski, 2019; Zhou et al., 2019). In the field of RWGSRs, abundant studies have shown that K and other promoter additives are essential for some supported catalysts to acquire the expected CO product (Arunajatesan et al., 2007).

The highly K-promoted Fe/Al₂O₃ and Cu/SiO₂ catalysts give much higher CO formation rates than do their counterparts in the RWGSR mainly because the addition of K introduces abundant weak, medium, and strong basic sites, which helps to adsorb/activate CO₂ and further converts the CO₂ to CO through reaction (Choi et al., 1996; Chen et al., 2003). For the Ni/Al₂O₃ catalyst, carbonates are the main intermediates, decomposition of which to CO is relatively difficult. However, via modification of this catalyst with a strong base such KOH, the formates rather than the carbonate forms as the main intermediate, which strongly absorbs on the surface of the Ni-KOH/Al₂O₃ catalyst, contributes to CO formation and hinders further hydrogenation of the CO to CH₄ through C-O bond scission (Zhang et al., 2019a). Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the introduction of alkali promoter (K, Mg) by co-impregnation technique enhance the dispersity of Ni active species on the Al₂O₃, thus increasing the RWGSR performance (Ranjabar et al., 2019). The addition of K promoter leads to an electron transfer from Pt to O in KO_x species, resulting in the generation of interfacial active sites over the Pt/mutille catalyst, which is proposed to be more responsible for the production of CO (Liang et al., 2017). Similarly, the K promoter acts as a reducing agent relative to the Fe metal, and the observed increase in the ratio of the Fe²⁺/Fe³⁺ ions over the BaFe-hexaaluminates after the K addition reflects the increasing concentration of reduced Fe²⁺ ions in the hexaaluminate lattice, which is accompanied by the appearance of oxygen vacancies due to the cleavage of one of the neighboring Fe-O-M (M = Al, Ba) bonds in the first coordination sphere of Fe ions. These vacancies play a role in the sites for CO₂ adsorption forming monodentate surface carbonates followed by redox transformation evolving CO and leaving the second oxygen bonded to the Fe³⁺ ion (Wang et al., 2013b,c; Utsis et al., 2018). The results of DFT calculations demonstrate that the K adatom greatly stabilizes the adsorption of all oxygenate intermediates through direct K-O bonding formation on K-modified Cu(111) and Cu(110) surfaces, thus promoting CO₂ dissociation in the RWGSR. In general, the different promoting effects of alkali metals on CO₂ dissociation are due to their electronegativities, which induce different work function changes and surface dipole moments. Correspondingly, the promoting effects on CO₂ dissociation induced by alkali metals increase in the order of Na < K < Rb < Cs, while the electronegativity of various alkali metals decreases in the order of Na > K > Rb > Cs (Wang and Wang, 2019). In accordance with the above effects, the electronegative character facilitates the electronic transfer from Cs to Mo and Fe and leads to an electronically rich surface, which favors the selectivity toward CO over the corresponding catalysts (Pastor-Pérez et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2019b). For the WC/γ-Al₂O₃ catalyst, the addition of the K promoter not only has a structural effect to promote the dispersion of the WC species across the high surface area support but also can serve as electronic promotion to strengthen CO and CO₂ adsorption while weakening H₂ adsorption, which is therefore hypothesized to result in a lower H₂/Co_x on the catalyst surface, thus inhibiting hydrogenation activity for CH₄ and accelerating the generation of CO via the RWGSR (Morse et al., 2020). Specifically, our studies have systematically investigated the effect of K promoter on the activities and selectivities of zeolite L-supported Pt catalysts for the RWGSR, as shown in Figure 8. This study concluded that an additive K promoter not only alters the work function of Pt through their interaction but also forms Pt-O(OH)-K interfacial sites. In addition, the electronic properties of Pt-O(OH)-K sites, with a charge transfer from the Pt surface to the adjacent O in KO_x, facilitate the formation of formate intermediates and desorption of the CO. However, with excessive addition of K, the access of the reactants to the Pt surface and interface is tightly blocked. Thus, the activity of the RWGSR is significantly promoted by the controlled addition of K promoter (Yang et al., 2017).

FIGURE 8

Figure 8. RWGSR over Pt/L catalysts with different K contents. Reprinted with permission from Yang et al. (2017). Copyright (2017) Elsevier.

Oxide Catalysts

Reducible transition oxides are intensively employed in RWGSR catalysts due to their relative abundance and their OSC, which is the ability to reversibly store and release oxygen while formally switching the valence state of the metal ion in its own structure under a CO₂/H₂ atmosphere (Reddy et al., 2010; Dong et al., 2012; Yao et al., 2013). The O atom can be deprived of H₂ in the oxide lattice to generate surface oxygen vacancies, which are much more favorable to the generation of CO rather than CH₄, because the oxygen from the C-O bond cleavage of the CO₂ molecule can be accommodated, but this leads to unsatisfactory catalytic activity and thermal stability (Katta et al., 2010; Ahn et al., 2012; Graciani et al., 2014). Normally, the additional introduction of heteroatoms into the oxides leads to the formation of spinel, solid solution, and perovskite-type oxides, and their ultra-stable structure is conductive to reversible oxygen donor-acceptor over oxygen vacancies sites, which thus effectively overcome the disadvantages of pure oxides as RWGSR catalysts (Ringuedẽ and Fouletier, 2001; Royer et al., 2005).

ZnO-based oxides are preferentially utilized to catalyze the RWGSR during the CAMARE process due to its ease of formation of metal composite oxides with high stability and specific activity (Li et al., 2002; Schmale et al., 2013). Nonetheless, ZnO-based oxide catalysts are vulnerable to the reduction of ZnO to Zn metal and therefore the loss of ZnO active components when exposed to high thermal reaction conditions, which contributes to their catalytic deactivation (Park et al., 2001). The formation of the spinel structure of the ZnAl₂O₄ phase by addition of Al₂O₃ to the ZnO catalyst can cause resistance to its catalytic deactivation in the RWGSR (Joo and Jung, 2003). Similarly, when Fe₂O₃ is substituted by ZnO over the Fe₂O₃/Cr₂O₃ catalyst, the corresponding ZnCr₂O₄ phase is formed and thus becomes stable (Park et al., 2000). In the synthetic process of the ZnZrO_x mixed oxide, the substitution of the Zr in the first layers of the m-ZrO₂ lattice with Zn causes the formation of a surface solution (Zn_xZr_1−xO_2−y), which generates oxygen vacancies and improves its stability, reducibility, and oxygen mobility, thus increasing the CO₂ conversion in the RWGSR (Silva-Calpa et al., 2016).

The widespread application of CeO₂-based oxide in RWGSR catalysts is mainly due to its high OSC, which is inextricably correlated with the catalytic activity (Masui et al., 1997; Wang and Liu, 2018). Both the manipulation of the CeO₂ shape with emphasis on tuning its fraction of reactive crystal planes and the doping CeO₂ with heterocations to alter its structure and chemical properties are effective strategies to obtain a superior OSC (Sun et al., 2012; Zhou and Li, 2012). Considering their distinct morphologies (particles, rods, and cubes), the higher activity of CeO₂ cubes in the RWGSR is due to the superior inherent reactivity of the CeO₂ (100) crystal planes enclosing the cubes, contrary to the less inherently reactive CeO₂ (111) facets enclosing the rods and particles in the RWGSR (Kovacevic et al., 2016). The CeO₂ lattice distortion caused by the incorporation of heterocations such as Zn increases the oxygen vacancy defects and thus accelerates the mobility of the oxygen ions, leading to a higher OSC, thus markedly enhancing its catalytic activity in the RWGSR (Lin et al., 2015; Wenzel et al., 2017). In addition, either Ce_0.75Zr_0.25O₂ or Ce_0.75Zr_0.5O₂ solid solution can be formed by the addition of Zr to the CeO₂ lattice, increasing its ability to generate oxygen vacancies and, more importantly, promoting its thermal stability, which is a very promising aspect of catalytic systems employed in reactions in which the RWGSR is one of the steps in the processes that generate hydrocarbons from CO₂ (Zonetti et al., 2014; Wenzel et al., 2018).

The adsorption of CO₂ on In₂O₃ has an adsorption energy of −1.25 eV, which is sufficiently exothermic and thus favorable, so the O-C-O angle of the CO₂ on adsorbed on the In₂O₃ is significantly distorted relative to the gas phase structure, significantly increasing the activity of the CO₂ in the RWGSR (Ye et al., 2012; Sun et al., 2014). The oxygen vacancies are increasingly created and stabilized on In₂O₃ with the presence of CeO₂ in the In₂O₃-CeO₂ catalyst, on which the dissociated H₂ adsorption is enhanced and the amount of bicarbonate species resulting from activated CO₂ is increased, which thus exhibits enhanced catalytic activity for the RWGSR (Wang et al., 2016c). Cubic In₂O₃[denoted as c-In₂O₃(110)] exhibits a higher RWGSR rate than the hexagonal In₂O₃[denoted as h-In₂O₃(110)] at temperature below 350°C due to its enhanced dissociative adsorption of H₂, facile formation of the oxygen vacancies, and enhanced ability to adsorb and activate CO₂ on the oxygen vacancies (Wang et al., 2020). DFT calculations indicate that the oxygen vacancies sites on the In₂O₃ (110) surface assist CO₂ activation and hydrogenation and stabilize the key intermediates involved in CO formation (Ye et al., 2013). Furthermore, an In₂O_3−x(OH)_y surface containing both Lewis base hydroxide groups and Lewis acid In sites together with oxygen vacancies can heterolytically dissociate H₂ to form a hydride bonded to In metal and a proton bonded to a lattice O. This hydrogenated In₂O_3−x(OH)_y surface facilitates CO₂ reduction by mediating the charge transfer between the In₂O_3−x(OH)_y surface and adsorbed reactants CO₂ and H₂ to form CO and H₂O (Ghuman et al., 2015). Well-tempered MetaD-biased AIMD simulations have been performed, taking the temperature into account, to probe the mechanism for the RGWS reaction over the In₂O_3−x(OH)_y surface at temperatures of 20 and 180°C, as shown in Figure 9, and the results show that the reduction of gaseous CO₂ is the rate-limiting step, with no significant change resulting from increased temperature. However, the energy barrier corresponding to the adsorption of CO₂ is slightly reduced at 180°C compared to the that at 20°C, suggesting that the thermal effects may only be relevant to the reaction step characterized by an adsorptive mechanisms and that the increased thermal conditions may enhance the reactivity by enabling the surface frustrated Lewis pairs to become further spatially separated (Ghoussoub et al., 2016).

FIGURE 9

Figure 9. Overall proposed mechanism for the RWGSR on In₂O_3−x(OH)_y at 20°C (pink line) and 180°C (blue line). Reprinted with permission from Ghoussoub et al. (2016). Copyright (2016) American Chemical Society.

The perovskite-type oxides are represented by an ABO₃ formula, where the A-site is typically occupied by lanthanides or alkaline earth metals, and the B-site is usually filled with transition metals (Yamazoe et al., 1981; Peña and Fierro, 2001; de Lima et al., 2009). With multiple cation combinations possible on each site, perovskite-type oxides can be easily customized to achieve desirable properties, such as high oxygen mobility and tunability, together with thermal stability at high temperatures without aggregation (Royer et al., 2005; Kae et al., 2014). Therefore, these materials are attractive for application to the RWGSR with chemical looping cycles (RWGSR-CL) that can convert CO₂ and H₂ to separate streams of CO and H₂O, as depicted in Figure 10 (Ringuedẽ and Fouletier, 2001). The combination of La and Sr in the A-site and metal in the B-site enhances the formation of oxygen vacancies due to the generation of a charge imbalance in the ABO₃ structure caused by the difference in their oxidation states (Daza et al., 2014). Regarding Co-based perovskite type oxides (La_0.75Sr_0.25CoO_3−δ), under H₂ flow conditions, their phases can change to metallic cobalt and base oxides (Co/SrCO₃/La₂O₃), which are then reoxidized to a layered perovskite (CoO/LaSrCoO_4−δ) with a K₂NiF₄-type structure when exposed to CO₂, thus producing CO during this cycle. Additionally, the optimal isothermal reduction and conversion temperatures for maximizing the CO product rates of 113.9 μmole CO/g/min are 500°C (of 400, 500, and 600°C) and 850°C (of 650, 750, and 850°C), presumably due to the formation of mixed oxides and metallic cobalt crystalline phases (observed via X-ray diffraction) in close contact under these conditions (Royer et al., 2005). Fe-based perovskite type oxides [La_0.75Sr_0.25FeO₃ (LSF)] have shown the greatest promise in the RWGSR-CL process due to the low energy barrier for oxidation-state transitions (Fe³⁺-Fe²⁺) during the redox cycles (Peña and Fierro, 2001). Enhanced oxygen self-diffusion, material recyclability, and therefore the viability of LSF have been demonstrated for chemical looping when supported by redox materials with more abundant alternatives, such as CeO₂, ZrO₂, Al₂O₃, SiO₂, and TiO₂ (Li et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2014). In comparison, supports such as TiO₂ and Al₂O₃ demonstrate SMSIs, which often result in some degree of LSF particle encapsulation, even at low temperatures, thus hindering the CO₂ adsorption on the surface oxygen vacancies, whereas SiO₂ demonstrates more moderate interactions that are strong enough and suitable for particle segregation yet weak enough to avoid deactivation (Min et al., 2003; Hare et al., 2019). These behaviors occur because the utilization of SiO₂ as a support significantly reduces the average LSF crystallite size and the extent of oxygen self-diffusion retardation, and the CO generation yields of LSF/SiO₂ surpass those of LSF alone by ~200%, producing 2.6 mmol of ${CO}_{gLSF}^{- 1}$ at a peak rate of 0.8 mmol ${CO}_{gLSF}^{- 1}$ min⁻¹ (Hare et al., 2018). In addition, further modification of Fe-based perovskite type oxides with transition metals helps to increase the strength of the interaction of the active species and support and thus stabilizes the unusual cationic oxidation state in the RWGSR process (Nitarori et al., 1988). The incorporation of Cu in La_0.75Sr_0.25Fe_1−YCu_YO₃ perovskites [Cu100^*Y (with Y = 0, 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1)] facilitates the formation of oxygen vacancies at lower temperatures. CO production is promoted in the Cu10 sample vs. Cu0 and Cu25, likely due to a combined effect of better CO₂ dissociative chemisorption energies on metallic Cu and decreased thermodynamic stability of the oxygen-deficient perovskites (Daza et al., 2016). The enhanced crystalline structure stability is aroused by the incorporation of Co in the La_0.75Sr_0.25Co_(1−Y) Fe_YO₃ perovskite. Additionally, a computational investigation using DFT calculations correlates CO₂ adsorption strength, generally a strong barrier in CO₂ conversion, on the (100) crystal facets on La_0.75Sr_0.25FeO_(3−δ) to increasing the surface oxygen vacancies (δ). Therefore, δ in the perovskite is the driving force to break the CO-O bond and reoxidize the La_0.75Sr_0.25FeO_3−δ (Daza et al., 2015; Maiti et al., 2016).

FIGURE 10

Figure 10. Reverse water gas shift–chemical looping process. Reprinted with permission from Ringuedẽ and Fouletier (2001). Copyright (2018) American Chemical Society.

Conclusion and Outlook

The large-scale conversion of CO₂ to CO via the RWGSR is a promising route with great potential for use in the near future, provided a mature technology for commercial production of renewable H₂ is also available. The RWGSR also achieves higher CO₂ conversion than other relevant technologies that meet the global CO₂ emissions standards. Because it is a slightly endothermic and pressure-independent reaction, the current challenge for RWGSR employed in fuel synthesis is the design of thermally stable materials that can achieve high CO selectivity and high production rates. Preferential strategies have recently been enacted to address the existing problems either by modulating the SMSI, size of the active metal, second metal composition, and addition of alkali promoter for supported catalysts or by dipping with additional heteroatoms or tuning their crystal planes for oxide catalysts. Furthermore, the perovskite-type oxides can act as the oxygen donor-acceptor for the RWGSR-CL to not only circumvent thermodynamic and kinetic limitations but also eliminate the possibility of methanation as a side reaction because there is no direct interaction between two feed gases and between two product streams.

From this systematic introduction, the relationships between the nature of the active sites and the main intermediates of RWGSR catalysts are understood through the insights gained from the molecular dynamic simulations and mechanistic work under the operando reaction conditions, which is beneficial to the development of state-of-the-art architecture of RWGSR catalysts. However, even though several materials have been studied, improvements are still possible, especially for commercial development of RWGSR catalysts for laboratory and market applications. If the RWGSR plays a major role in the reduction of the atmospheric CO₂ concentration, then designing catalysts with earth-abundant materials will be necessary and desirable. To develop supported metals, both Fe oxides and Ni oxides are chosen to be investigated as representative substitutes for the most commonly used reducible supports, such as CeO₂, ZnO, and In₂O₃, largely due to their oxygen vacancies with high oxygen mobility and stability, which can activate CO₂ more easily by accommodating oxygen due to the C-O bond cleavage in the RWGSR. Additionally, transition metal carbides are attractive and convenient alternatives for industrial use in the RWGSR because of their properties, which are similar to those of precious metals, as well as their dual functionality for H₂ dissociation and C-O bond scission and their potential to behave similarly to reducible oxides.

Author Contributions

XC, CS, and YC drafted the manuscript, conceived the concept of the review, conducted literature survey, and arranged the figures. NW provided the suggestions. WW and LC revised the manuscript and provided comments. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This project is financially supported by the Startup Research Fund of Dongguan University of Technology (KCYKYQD2017015), the Postdoctoral Startup Research Fund of Dongguan University of Technology (No.196100040019), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2019M653608).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Ahn, K. Y., Yoo, D. S., Prasad, D. H., Lee, H. W., Chung, Y. C., and Lee, J. H. (2012). Role of multivalent Pr in the formation and migration of oxygen vacancy in Pr-Doped ceria: experimental and first-principles investigations. Chem. Mater. 24, 4261–4267. doi: 10.1021/cm3022424